Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol.
Sec. Food Microbiology
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1399907
This article is part of the Research Topic Fermented Foods: Characterization of the Autochthonous Microbiota View all 4 articles

Formic Acid Enhances Whole-Plant Mulberry Silage Fermentation by Boosting Lactic Acid Production and Inhibiting Harmful Bacteria

Provisionally accepted
Lihong Hao Lihong Hao *Fugui Jiang Fugui Jiang Yanping Wang Yanping Wang *Huaizhong Wang Huaizhong Wang *Hongmei Hu Hongmei Hu *Wei You Wei You *Xin Hu Xin Hu *Haijian Cheng Haijian Cheng *Cheng Wang Cheng Wang *Enliang Song Enliang Song *
  • Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, Shandong Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    This study was developed to investigate the impact of four additives and combinations thereof on fermentation quality and bacterial communities associated with whole-plant mulberry silage. Control fresh material (FM) was left untreated, while other groups were treated with glucose (G, 20 g/kg FM), a mixture of Lactobacillus plantarum and L. buchneri (L, 106 CFU/g FM), formic acid (A, 5 mL/kg FM), salts including sodium benzoate and potassium sorbate (S, 1.5 g/kg FM), a combination of G and L (GL), a combination of G and A (GA), or a combination of G and S (GS), followed by ensiling for 90 days. Dry matter content in the A, S, GA, and GS groups was elevated relative to the other groups (P < 0.01). Relative to the C group, all additives and combinations thereof were associated with reductions in pH and NH3-N content (P < 0.01). The highest levels of lactic acid were observed in the A and GA groups (P < 0.01), followed by the L, GL, and GS groups, with all of these values being higher than those for the C group. Lactobacillus were the predominant bacteria associated with each of these samples, but the overall composition of the bacterial community was significantly impacted by different additives. For example, Lactobacillus levels were higher in the G, A, and GA groups, while those of Weissella levels were raised in the L, GL, and GS groups, Pediococcus levels were higher in the A and GA groups, Enterococcus levels were higher in the G and S groups, and Lactococcus levels were raised in the S group. Relative to the C group, a reduction in the levels of undesirable Enterobacter was evident in all groups treated with additives, with the greatest reductions being evident in the A, S, GA, and GS groups. The additives utilized in this study can thus improve the quality of whole-plant mulberry silage to varying extents through the modification of the associated bacterial community, with A and GA addition achieving the most efficient reductions in pH together with increases in lactic acid content and the suppression of undesirable bacterial growth.

    Keywords: mulberry, Silage, Glucose, Formic acid, Lactic acid bacteria, Salts, bacterial community

    Received: 12 Mar 2024; Accepted: 21 May 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Hao, Jiang, Wang, Wang, Hu, You, Hu, Cheng, Wang and Song. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Lihong Hao, Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, Shandong Province, China
    Yanping Wang, Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, Shandong Province, China
    Huaizhong Wang, Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, Shandong Province, China
    Hongmei Hu, Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, Shandong Province, China
    Wei You, Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, Shandong Province, China
    Xin Hu, Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, Shandong Province, China
    Haijian Cheng, Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, Shandong Province, China
    Cheng Wang, Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, Shandong Province, China
    Enliang Song, Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, Shandong Province, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.