Targeted pharmacological treatment of autism spectrum disorders: fragile X and Rett syndromes

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) are genetically and clinically heterogeneous and lack effective medications to treat their core symptoms. Studies of syndromic ASDs caused by single gene mutations have provided insights into the pathophysiology of autism. Fragile X and Rett syndromes belong to the syndromic ASDs in which preclinical studies have identified rational targets for drug therapies focused on correcting underlying neural dysfunction. These preclinical discoveries are increasingly translating into exciting human clinical trials. Since there are significant molecular and neurobiological overlaps among ASDs, targeted treatments developed for fragile X and Rett syndromes may be helpful for autism of different etiologies. Here, we review the targeted pharmacological treatment of fragile X and Rett syndromes and discuss related issues in both preclinical studies and clinical trials of potential therapies for the diseases.

Introduction

Autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) encompass a group of neurodevelopmental disorders which are of different etiologies and characterized by impairments in socialization and communication, abnormalities in language development, restricted interests, and repetitive and stereotyped behaviors (Mefford et al., 2012; Zoghbi and Bear, 2012; Murdoch and State, 2013; Anagnostou et al., 2014b; Lai et al., 2014). These disorders are estimated to affect approximately 1% of the population. The genetic causes of ASDs show a high degree of heterogeneity, with hundreds of ASD-associated genes now identified (Mefford et al., 2012; Huguet et al., 2013; Murdoch and State, 2013; Lai et al., 2014; Ronemus et al., 2014). However, recent studies suggest that these ASD genes may functionally converge into a relatively smaller subset of cellular and biochemical pathways affecting distinct neuronal functions (Auerbach et al., 2011; Zoghbi and Bear, 2012; Ebert and Greenberg, 2013; Doll and Broadie, 2014; Krumm et al., 2014). In a subset of ASDs, such as the syndromic ASD fragile X syndrome, Rett syndrome (RTT) and tuberous sclerosis, mutations of genes have been found to be related to synaptic function, suggesting that abnormal neuronal homeostasis is a risk factor for ASD (Auerbach et al., 2011; Santoro et al., 2012; Zoghbi and Bear, 2012; Ebert and Greenberg, 2013; Banerjee et al., 2014). This subset of ASDs belong to a larger group of neurological conditions called “synaptopathies”, which refer to disorders with altered synaptic function and/or morphology as primary neuropathology (Auerbach et al., 2011; Zoghbi and Bear, 2012; Krumm et al., 2014). The functional convergence on particular signaling pathways and the shared synaptopathology of ASDs have raised the hope that similar therapeutic strategies may be effective for different forms of ASDs which are related, but genetically distinct (Zoghbi and Bear, 2012; Delorme et al., 2013; Wang and Doering, 2013).

Fragile X and Rett syndromes are two of the most widely and intensively studied monogenetic ASDs (Santoro et al., 2012; Zoghbi and Bear, 2012; Castro et al., 2013; Chapleau et al., 2013a; Banerjee et al., 2014). Numerous studies have investigated the possibility of treating fragile X and Rett syndromes in their relative animal models. Strategies to alleviate abnormal phenotypes include genetic manipulation, cellular therapy, pharmacological intervention and environmental stimulation (Wang and Doering, 2012; Zoghbi and Bear, 2012; Castro et al., 2013; Chapleau et al., 2013a; Delorme et al., 2013; Ebert and Greenberg, 2013). Most encouraging, some of these fundamental studies have led to the development of drugs that are in clinical trials.

In this review, we summarize the potential therapeutic targets and relative pharmacological interventions in fragile X and Rett syndromes. The challenges in preclinical studies and clinical trials, and the implications of these targeted pharmacological treatments for other ASDs and related neurodevelopmental disorders are also discussed.

Targeted pharmacotherapy for fragile X syndrome

Fragile X syndrome is one of the most common genetic causes of intellectual disability and autism. It is mostly caused by the mutation of the trinucleotide CGG expansion in the 5′-untranslated region of the fragile X mental retardation (FMR1) gene, which eventually leads to the absence of its protein product, fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) (Garber et al., 2008; Bhakar et al., 2012; Santoro et al., 2012; Hagerman et al., 2014). FMRP is ubiquitous with the most abundance in the central nervous system (Santoro et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2012a; Sidorov et al., 2013) and exists in both neurons and glial cells (Wang et al., 2004; Pacey and Doering, 2007).

FMRP, a RNA binding protein, binds its mRNA targets and regulates the transport and translation of those mRNAs (Bear et al., 2004; Penagarikano et al., 2007; Bhakar et al., 2012; Santoro et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2012a; Sidorov et al., 2013; Abekhoukh and Bardoni, 2014). The mRNA targets of FMRP encode pre- and post-synaptic proteins and some of these proteins are implicated in other ASDs, suggesting a molecular overlap between fragile X syndrome and other neurodevelopmental disorders (Bhakar et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2012a; Sidorov et al., 2013). FMRP normally acts as a translational repressor, especially at synapses. Its absence has profound consequences on neural development and synaptic plasticity. Alterations in synaptic structure and function are believed to underlie the fragile X symptoms. Dysregulated protein synthesis is central to fragile X synaptopathy (Bear et al., 2004; Penagarikano et al., 2007; Bassell and Warren, 2008; Wang et al., 2010a; Bhakar et al., 2012; Santoro et al., 2012; Sidorov et al., 2013).

Over the past two decades, efforts have been made to elucidate the molecular and cellular events that give rise to synaptic dysfunction in fragile X syndrome. Studies in animal models have revealed defects in multiple neurotransmitter systems and relative signaling pathways/molecules that are responsible for fragile X synaptopathy (Wang et al., 2010b; Bhakar et al., 2012; Gross et al., 2012; Santoro et al., 2012; Zoghbi and Bear, 2012; Delorme et al., 2013; Ebert and Greenberg, 2013). Advances in neurobiology of fragile X syndrome have led to the development of therapeutic agents that target the underlying mechanisms of the disease (Summarized in Figure 1; Tables 1, 2).

Figure 1

Targeting neurotransmitter/neuromodulator systems

Metabotropic glutamate receptors

Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) play important roles in synaptic plasticity, learning and memory (Bortolotto et al., 1999; Bear et al., 2004; Wang et al., 2008a; Wang and Zhuo, 2012; Mukherjee and Manahan-Vaughan, 2013). Activation of group 1 mGluRs (mGluR1s and mGluR5s) leads to local translation of pre-existing mRNAs and triggers long-term depression (LTD) (Weiler and Greenough, 1993; Bortolotto et al., 1999; Raymond et al., 2000; Penagarikano et al., 2007; Ronesi and Huber, 2008a; Upreti et al., 2013). FMRP is one of these newly synthesized proteins and serves as a repressor of the translation of other synaptic mRNAs that encode LTD proteins such as activity-regulated cytoskeleton-associated protein (Arc), microtubule associated protein (MAP) 1B and Striatal-enriched protein tyrosine phosphatase (STEP), which mediate a-amino-3-hydroxyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid receptor (AMPAR) internalization and LTD stabilization (Bhakar et al., 2012; Santoro et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2012a; Darnell and Klann, 2013; Sidorov et al., 2013). In fragile X conditions, protein synthesis is elevated and mGluR-LTD in the hippocampus is exaggerated in the absence of FMRP; the enhanced mGluR-LTD is no longer protein synthesis dependent as a result of increased basal protein synthesis. The mGluR theory of fragile X syndrome thus postulates that the core symptoms of the disease result from exaggerated group 1 mGluR mediated signaling including mGluR-LTD (Bear et al., 2004; Garber et al., 2008; Bhakar et al., 2012; Santoro et al., 2012; Sidorov et al., 2013).

The mGluR theory and its therapeutic significance have been validated in both genetic and pharmacological rescue studies (Dölen and Bear, 2008; Hays et al., 2011; Thomas et al., 2011; Gandhi et al., 2014; Michalon et al., 2014; Pop et al., 2014). In Fmr1 knockout mice, the mGluR5 antagonist 2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)-pyridine (MPEP) stabilized hippocampal protein synthesis, increased the density or rescued the morphology of hippocampal dendritic spines, corrected altered brain network function, reduced audiogenic seizures and repetitive and/or perseverative behaviors (marble burying), rescued the deficits in prepulse inhibition of startle response, and improved the maze and motor learning (Yan et al., 2005; de Vrij et al., 2008; Hays et al., 2011; Thomas et al., 2012; Gandhi et al., 2014). Other mGluR5 antagonists tested in fragile X animal models include CTEC, fenobam and AFQ056. Acute treatment with CTEC corrected the elevated hippocampal LTD, protein synthesis, and audiogenic seizures; chronic treatment rescued cognitive deficits, auditory hypersensitivity, aberrant dendritic spine density, overactive extracellular signal regulated kinase (ERK) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling, and partially corrected macroorchidism in adult fragile X mice (Michalon et al., 2012). Chronic CTEP treatment also corrected learning deficit in the inhibitory avoidance and extinction test, and partially normalized altered local brain activity in these animals (Michalon et al., 2014). Fenobam reversed some synaptic alterations in the cortex (Wang et al., 2014) and corrected deficits in associative motor learning and avoidance behaviors in fragile X mice (Vinueza Veloz et al., 2012). AFQ056 was found to be able to correct aberrant hippocampal dendritic spine morphology (Levenga et al., 2011; Pop et al., 2014), and rescue deficits in prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle response and abnormal social behaviors (Levenga et al., 2011; Gantois et al., 2013) in Fmr1 knockout mice. Treatment with mGluR1 antagonists (JNJ16259685 or LY367385) decreased repetitive and/or perseverative behaviors (Thomas et al., 2012), and rescued dysregulated synaptic protein synthesis in fragile X mice (Gross et al., 2010; Guo et al., 2012). These preclinical studies have been paving the way for treatments with mGluR antagonists in humans.

Fenobam, the first mGluR antagonist used in patients, showed beneficial effects, such as reduced anxiety and hyperarousal, improved prepulse inhibition of startle, and better accuracy on a continuous performance task, in adults with fragile X syndrome (Berry-Kravis et al., 2009). The pharmacokinetics and side effects of fenobam are currently tested in adult healthy volunteers.¹ AFQ056 also showed improvements in inappropriate speech, stereotypic behavior, and hyperactivity and efficacy in adult patients with fully methylated FMR1 (Jacquemont et al., 2011). However, the mGluR5 negative allosteric modulator RG7090 (RO4917523) in fragile X was recently discontinued by Roche due to negative phase II clinical study results from fragile X patients.² More drugs targeting mGluRs with higher efficacy and better safety need to be developed in the future (Berry-Kravis, 2014; Hagerman et al., 2014).

GABAergic receptors

The γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is the main inhibitory neurotransmitter in brain and signals through GABA_A and GABA_B receptors (Ben-Ari et al., 2012; Gassmann and Bettler, 2012; Sigel and Steinmann, 2012). The deficiencies in GABA receptor expression and GABA receptor-mediated inhibition have been demonstrated in fragile X animal models, linking GABA receptors to fragile X phenotypes and leading to the hypothesis that fragile X syndrome may result from an imbalance between excitation and inhibition, and increasing inhibition may ameliorate some fragile X pathophysiologies, including dysregulated protein synthesis (D’Hulst et al., 2006, 2009; Chang et al., 2008; Pacey et al., 2009; Olmos-Serrano et al., 2010; Paluszkiewicz et al., 2011; He et al., 2014). The potential of GABA receptors as a therapeutic target for fragile X syndrome has been validated in animal models. Treatment with a selective GABA_A receptor agonist THIP (gaboxadol) corrected neuronal hyperexcitability in the amygdala (Olmos-Serrano et al., 2010), and attenuated hyperactivity and deficits in prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response of fragile X mice (Olmos-Serrano et al., 2011). Treatment with ganaxolone, a positive allosteric modulator of GABA_A receptors, could prevent audiogenic seizures in Fmr1 knockout mice (Heulens et al., 2012). The GABA_B receptor agonist baclofen reduced locomotor activity and hyperactivity (Zupan and Toth, 2008), and ameliorated audiogenic seizure susceptibility of Fmr1 knockout mice (Pacey et al., 2009, 2011). Notably, arbaclofen (STX209), the R-isomer of baclofen, was also able to attenuate audiogenic seizures in fragile X mice (Henderson et al., 2012). In addition, arbaclofen corrected dysregulated protein synthesis in the hippocampus, restored the elevated AMPA receptor internalization and the increased spine density, and thus corrected synaptic abnormalities which are central to fragile X pathophysiologies, suggesting that arbaclofen could be potentially used to treat the core symptoms of fragile X patients (Henderson et al., 2012).

A large clinical trial with ganaxolone is currently ongoing in children and adolescents with fragile X syndrome between 6 to 17 years of age (Wijetunge et al., 2013; Berry-Kravis, 2014; Hagerman et al., 2014).³ A controlled trial of arbaclofen in 63 fragile X patients between 6 to 40 years of age has revealed significant beneficial treatment effects, such as improvements in socialization and social avoidance scores, particularly in those with more severe social impairments, suggesting that GABA_B receptor agonists have potential to improve social function and behaviors in fragile X patients (Berry-Kravis et al., 2012). However, this clinical trial for arbaclofen failed to fulfill its initial endpoints and had to be terminated by Seaside Therapeutics due to resource limitations.⁴ Acamprosate, with agonist properties on both GABA_A and GABA_B receptors, was well tolerated and was found to significantly improve social behavior and reduce inattention/hyperactivity in 12 fragile X children aged 6–17 years in a prospective open-label 10-week trial. Additionally, an increase in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in blood was observed with treatment and might become a useful biomarker for future clinical studies (Erickson et al., 2010, 2013). A double-blind, placebo-controlled study will be needed to further assess the effect of acamprosate. As a whole, it is hopeful that some of the GABA receptor agonists may eventually become clinically applicable.

Serotonin receptors/transporters

The serotonin (5-Hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) system is involved in various brain functions, including synaptic plasticity, learning and memory (Matthys et al., 2011; Lesch and Waider, 2012; Gellynck et al., 2013). It has been shown that 5-HT7 receptor (agonist 8-OH-DPAT) activation could reverse mGluR-induced AMPA receptor internalization and correct excessive mGluR-LTD in hippocampal neurons of Fmr1 knockout mice, suggesting that 5-HT receptors may represent a novel therapeutic target for fragile X syndrome (Costa et al., 2012). Interestingly, a recent study has demonstrated that compounds activating 5-HT2B receptors or inhibiting 5-HT2A receptors could enhance phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling transduction and AMPA GluR1 dependent synaptic plasticity, and restore learning in Fmr1 knockout mice, further linking 5-HT receptors to fragile X syndrome (Lim et al., 2014).

The alteration of 5-HT and its transporters have been known to associate with autism (Chugani, 2002; Devlin et al., 2005; Prasad et al., 2009; Veenstra-VanderWeele et al., 2012; Harrington et al., 2013). 5-HT transporters are the main target for widely used antidepressant agents including fluoxetine (Wong et al., 2005). Fluoxetine binds to 5-HT transporters and blocks 5-HT uptake from the synaptic cleft into presynaptic vesicles in the central nervous system (Wong et al., 2005; Tavoulari et al., 2009). Studies have suggested that fluoxetine may be beneficial to individuals with autism (Hollander et al., 2005, 2012; Kolevzon et al., 2006). Treatment with fluoxetine has shown some effect in fragile X mice and patients (Hagerman et al., 1999; Uutela et al., 2014). However, fluoxetine has some possible side effects in clinic, such as mood changes, agitation, restlessness, and aggression, and may not be suitable to all individuals with fragile X syndrome and other ASDs (Wernicke, 2004; Kolevzon et al., 2006; Uutela et al., 2014).

Dopamine receptors

Dopamine plays critical roles in synaptic plasticity, cognitive functioning and neuropsychiatic pathologies (Jay, 2003; Seamans and Yang, 2004; Surmeier et al., 2009; Cerovic et al., 2013). Deficits in the dopamine system have been demonstrated in both fragile X animal models and patients (Roberts et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2008b; Weinshenker and Warren, 2008; Fulks et al., 2010; Paul et al., 2013; Rogers et al., 2013). Electrophysiological studies have found that dopaminergic modulation of synaptic transmission and potentiation are impaired in fragile X mice (Wang et al., 2008b; Paul et al., 2013). Biochemical studies have further revealed that dopamine D1 receptor mediated synapse-associated protein synthesis, AMPA GluR1 receptor surface expression and subsequent internalization are defective in these mice (Wang et al., 2008b, 2010a). Application of the D1 receptor agonist and/or D2 receptor antagonist could promote PI3K signaling and AMPA GluR1 receptor delivery, and improve learning behaviors in Fmr1 knockout mice (Lim et al., 2014). The dopamine D1 receptor agonist also partially rescued the hyperactivity and enhanced motor function of fragile X mice (Wang et al., 2008b). These findings suggest that dopamine receptors could be a potential target for effectively treating cognitive impairment associated with fragile X syndrome.

Cannabinoid receptors

The endocannabinoids N-arachidonoyl ethanolamine and 2- arachidonoyl glycerol (2-AG) activate cannabinoid receptors (CB1R and CB2R), and modulate synaptic plasticity and cognitive function (Chevaleyre et al., 2006; Heifets and Castillo, 2009; Oudin et al., 2011). Alterations in endocannabinoid signaling contribute to cognitive dysfunction associated with fragile X syndrome. Various abnormalities in endocannabinoid signaling, such as CB1R-driven long-term regulation of synaptic strength due to mGluR5 activation, have been observed in several brain areas of Fmr1 knockout mice (Maccarrone et al., 2010; Zhang and Alger, 2010; Busquets-Garcia et al., 2013). FMRP exerts a regulatory control over the endocannabinoid system at central synapses (Maccarrone et al., 2010). Loss of FMRP affects endocannabinoid signaling, possibly through local 2-AG production (Straiker et al., 2013). In fragile X mice, the linkage between mGluR5 and the 2-AG producing enzyme, diacylglycerol lipase-α (DGL-α), is disrupted and mGluR5-dependent 2-AG formation is compromised, leading to impairment of endocannabinoid-mediated LTD in the ventral striatum and prefrontal cortex (Jung et al., 2012).

Pharmacological enhancement of 2-AG signaling by inhibiting 2-AG-deactivating enzyme monoacylglycerol lipase (MGL) with JZL184, normalized this synaptic defect and corrected behavioral abnormalities (hyperactivity and abnormal anxiety) in fragile X mice (Jung et al., 2012). Interestingly, dampening of endocannabinoid signaling through pharmacological or genetic approaches also benefit these mice. CB1R blockade with rimonabant or genetic reduction of CB1R, normalized cognitive impairment, nociceptive desensitization, susceptibility to audiogenic seizures, overactivated mTOR signaling and altered spine morphology in the male Fmr1 knockout (Fmr1(-/y)) mice, whereas CB2R antagonism with AM630 normalized anxiolytic-like behaviors in those mice (Busquets-Garcia et al., 2013). These studies thus demonstrate that targeting endocannabinoid signaling might provide a new therapeutic strategy for fragile X syndrome. Further investigation is needed to clarify the therapeutic value of this potential target.

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors

The G-protein coupled muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs, subtypes M1–M5) are widely expressed in the central nervous system and mediate the metabotropic actions of acetylcholine (Volpicelli and Levey, 2004; Picciotto et al., 2012). M1 mAChR activation facilitates synaptic plasticity, learning and memory. Activation of M1 mAChRs stimulates synthesis of synaptic proteins including FMRP, and induces protein synthesis dependent LTD similar to group 1 mGluR-LTD (McCoy and McMahon, 2007; Volk et al., 2007). In the absence of FMRP, hippocampal M1 mAChR-dependent LTD is enhanced, indicating overactive mAChR signaling in Fmr1 knockout mice (Volk et al., 2007). Genetic reduction of M4 mAChRs corrected the analgesic response and partly rescued the acoustic startle response in Fmr1 knockout mice (Veeraragavan et al., 2012). These studies suggest new therapeutic strategies for using mAChR antagonists in fragile X syndrome.

The subtype selective mAChR modulators, including the M1 receptor antagonist dicyclomine and M4 receptor antagonist tropicamide, have been tested in the fragile X mouse model. The M1 receptor antagonist dicyclomine decreased repetitive and/or perseverative behavior (marble burying) and reduced susceptibility to audiogenic seizures in Fmr1 knockout mice (Veeraragavan et al., 2011b). Similarly, the M4 receptor antagonist tropicamide also attenuated audiogenic seizure susceptibility in Fmr1 knockout mice (Veeraragavan et al., 2011a). Noteworthy, treatment with tropicamide reduced repetitive and/or perseverative behaviors, improved performance in the passive avoidance task in both wild-type and fragile X mice, and reduced audiogenic seizures in fragile X mice (Veeraragavan et al., 2011a). These studies indicate that pharmacological inhibition of mAChRs modulates specific behavioral responses and further support these receptors as therapeutic targets for fragile X syndrome.

Oxytocin receptors

Oxytocin acts as a neuromodulator through its receptors in various brain areas and regulates social cognition and behaviors (Neumann, 2008; Meyer-Lindenberg et al., 2011; Neumann and Landgraf, 2012; Knobloch and Grinevich, 2014). It is emerging as a target for treatment of anxiety and depression-related diseases or social dysfunction including autism (Neumann, 2008; Meyer-Lindenberg et al., 2011; Neumann and Landgraf, 2012; Anagnostou et al., 2014a; Preti et al., 2014). The perinatal excitatory-to-inhibitory shift of GABA is mediated by oxytocin receptors. Oxytocin-mediated GABA inhibition during delivery could attenuate autism pathogenesis in rodent offsprings. Application of the oxytocin receptor antagonist SSR126768A in naïve mothers could produce offspring which have the electrophysiological and behavioral autistic-like features (Tyzio et al., 2014). In fragile X mice, oxytocin is reduced in some brain regions and the oxytocin-mediated neuroprotective GABA excitatory-inhibitory shift during delivery is absent (Tyzio et al., 2014). This study thus indicates the importance of the oxytocin system in the pathogenesis of autism and fragile X sydrome.

The clinical actions of oxytocin have been validated in ASD patients, providing preliminary evidence that oxytocin is able to enhance brain function and improve social behaviors in autistic patients (Andari et al., 2010; Domes et al., 2013; Gordon et al., 2013; Anagnostou et al., 2014a; Preti et al., 2014; Scheele et al., 2014; Watanabe et al., 2014). Intranasal administration of oxytocin could ameliorate symptoms of social anxiety in children with fragile X syndrome (Hall et al., 2012). The double-blind placebo-controlled studies of oxytocin will be needed for further validation of its effect on fragile X patients.

AMPA receptors

The surface expression and synaptic delivery of AMPA receptors (GluR1) is impaired in Fmr1 knockout mice, altering signal transmission and synaptic plasticity (Nakamoto et al., 2007; Hu et al., 2008; Suvrathan et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2010a). AMPA receptor modulators have been tested in fragile X patients. CX516 is a positive allosteric modulator that potentiates glutamate activation with the final outcome of strengthening synapses (O’Neill et al., 2004; O’Neill and Witkin, 2007). In a double-blind placebo-controlled trial in adult patients with fragile X syndrome, 4-week treatment with CX516 produced no significant improvement in cognitive or behavioral measures (Berry-Kravis et al., 2006). The failure could be due to the potency of CX516 or its dosage which may be inadequate for a therapeutic effect. It is thus unclear whether modulation of AMPA receptors is a feasible therapeutic strategy for treatment of fragile X syndrome.

NMDA receptors

The defects in NMDA receptors observed in the hippocampus, prefrontal cortex and other brain areas of fragile X mice are believed to contribute to fragile X phenotypes (Pilpel et al., 2009; Suvrathan et al., 2010; Krueger et al., 2011; Yun and Trommer, 2011; Eadie et al., 2012; Gocel and Larson, 2012). Memantine is an uncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist and has been shown to improve language function and social behavior in autistic patients (Erickson and Chambers, 2006; Chez et al., 2007; Niederhofer, 2007). A study in cultured cerebellar granule cells from Fmr1 knockout mice suggested that memantine may exert therapeutic capacity for fragile X syndrome through a stimulatory effect on dendritic spine maturation and excitatory synapse formation (Wei et al., 2012). Although a pilot study showed that memantine was modestly effective in several patients with fragile X syndrome, a systematic clinical study is needed to further evaluate its effectiveness (Erickson et al., 2009).

Targeting signaling pathways downstream of neurotransmitter receptors

Studies in fragile X animal models have revealed defects in intracellular signaling pathways [Mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), PI3K, mTOR and glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK3)] which could be downstream of neurotransmitter receptors such as glutamate, GABA, endocannabinoid, 5-HT, dopamine or mACh receptors. These signaling pathways may serve as therapeutic targets for fragile X syndrome (Figure 1; Tables 1, 2).

Mitogen-activated protein kinases

MAPKs are a family of serine/threonine protein kinases, including ERKs, p38 MAPKs, and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK; Wang and Zhuo, 2012). The ERK1/2 pathway, which is activated by the Ras-mitogen-activated protein kinase/ERK kinase (MEK) and eventually leads to gene transcription or mRNA translation, plays critical roles in synaptic plasticity (Kelleher et al., 2004; Thomas and Huganir, 2004; Wiegert and Bading, 2011; Wang and Zhuo, 2012). A number of studies have investigated ERK signaling under basal conditions or upon mGluR-induction using brain tissues from fragile X animal models or patients (Kim et al., 2008; Weng et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2012b; Curia et al., 2013). Although these studies sometimes have presented conflicting results, most of them have shown that the ERK1/2 pathway is altered in fragile X conditions, suggesting that the ERK pathway is likely to have translational implications for fragile X syndrome (Weng et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2012b; Curia et al., 2013). Indeed, treatment with MEK1/2 inhibitor SL327 could prevent audiogenic seizures in Fmr1 knockout mice (Wang et al., 2012b). Inhibition of ERK1/2 with the MEK1/2-ERK1/2 inhibitor U0126 also reduced elevated protein synthesis in hippocampus of fragile X mice (Osterweil et al., 2010). These findings further support that ERK1/2 pathway and the neurotransmitter systems that stimulate ERK1/2 may represent additional therapeutic targets for fragile X syndrome. Interestingly, statins, drug widely prescribed to treat hypercholesterolemia, have shown potentials for treating fragile X syndrome. Lovastatin corrected the excess protein synthesis and the exaggerated mGluR-LTD in the hippocampal slices of Fmr1 knockout mice, attenuated hyperexcitability in visual cortex, and reduced audiogenic seizures in those mice (Osterweil et al., 2013). In a recent Phase I clinical trial, lovastatin was found to improve aberrant behaviors (social avoidance/unresponsiveness, stereotypy, hyperactivity and irritability) in majority (12/15) of fragile X patients after 12-weeks of treatment; the effect was significant after 4-week treatment at the lower dose, with further improvement during the 4–12 week treatment (Çaku et al., 2014). Although it was suggested that statins may alter membrane cholesterol and lipid rafts, thus modulating group I mGluRs or/and other neurotransmitter systems to correct fragile X phenotypes, the drugs might also exert the effects through direct inhibition of Ras–ERK activity (Kumari et al., 2013; Osterweil et al., 2013; Wang, 2014).

The JNK pathway is known to regulate mGluR-dependent gene transcription (Wang and Zhuo, 2012). A recent study has shown that JNK is essential for mGluR-dependent expression of FMRP target proteins. In addition, JNK activity is upregulated in synapses of Fmr1 knockout mice, and inhibition of JNK with SP600125 decreased elevated postsynaptic protein synthesis in these mice, suggesting that JNK could be a key signaling downstream of mGluR in regulating FMRP-dependent protein synthesis and may provide a strategy to restore the deficits in fragile X syndrome (Schmit et al., 2013).

Phosphoinositide 3-kinase

PI3K transduces signals from cell surface receptors to the Akt/mTOR pathway and is essential for dendritic spine development and synaptic plasticity underlying learning and memory (Horwood et al., 2006; Hu et al., 2008; Cuesto et al., 2011). The PI3K catalytic subunit p110beta can be regulated by FMRP. Both p110beta level and PI3K activity are elevated and insensitive to mGluR stimulation in Fmr1 knockout neurons, suggesting that dysregulated PI3K signaling may underlie synaptic deficits in fragile X syndrome (Gross et al., 2010; Gross and Bassell, 2014). PI3K inhibitor LY294002 corrected dysregulated synaptic protein synthesis, excess AMPA receptor internalization and the increased spine density in Fmr1 knockout neurons, supporting PI3K as a potential therapeutic target for fragile X syndrome (Gross et al., 2010). Development of specific inhibitors for PI3K subunits may help to translate this strategy to patients since selective inhibition of the p110b-subunit with TGX-221 has been found to rescue excess protein synthesis in synaptoneurosomes from fragile X mice and in patient cells (Gross et al., 2010; Gross and Bassell, 2012, 2014). Conversely, one recent study showed that promoting PI3K signaling by dipotassium bisperoxo (5-hydroxypyridine-2-carboxyl)oxovanadate (BpV), a phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) inhibitor, reversed deficits in both basal turnover and activity-mediated spine stabilization in hippocampal slices, restored defective long-term potentiation (LTP) mechanisms in slices and improved reversal learning in Fmr1 knockout mice (Boda et al., 2014). Thus, the specific role of PI3K signaling in fragile X syndrome needs to be further investigated due to the complexity of its upstream cell surface receptors and interactions with other signaling pathways.

Mammalian target of rapamycin

The mTOR signaling cascade controls initiation of cap-dependent translation (Hay and Sonenberg, 2004; Narayanan et al., 2008; Hoeffer and Klann, 2010). Its downstream effector ribosomal protein S6 kinase (S6K1) is a regulator of translation initiation and elongation in cap-dependent protein synthesis (Narayanan et al., 2008; Hoeffer and Klann, 2010). S6K1 is a major kinase which phosphorylates and regulates FMRP following group 1 mGluR or dopamine D1 receptor activation (Narayanan et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2010a). The basal levels of mTOR phosphorylation and activity were found to be elevated in the hippocampus of Fmr1 knockout mice (Sharma et al., 2010). In addition, group 1 mGluR activation of mTOR is absent is those mice (Ronesi and Huber, 2008b). The misregulation of mTOR signaling was also observed in fragile X patients (Hoeffer et al., 2012), suggesting that mTOR could be a target or biomarker for treatment of fragile X syndrome.

Treatment of Fmr1 knockout mice with temsirolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, prevented object recognition memory deficits and reduced audiogenic seizure susceptibility in those mice (Busquets-Garcia et al., 2013). Elevated phosphorylation of translational control molecules and exaggerated protein synthesis in fragile X mice were corrected through the targeting of S6K1. Genetic deletion of S6K1 also prevented a broad range of fragile X phenotypes, including exaggerated translation, enhanced mGluR-LTD, abnormal dendritic spine morphology, several behavioral characteristics and peripheral features (weight gain and macroorchidism) (Bhattacharya et al., 2012). Notably, administration of the mTORC1 (mTOR complex 1) inhibitor rapamycin improved sociability in the BTBR mouse model of ASDs (Burket et al., 2014); targeting downstream mTOR signaling such as eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) also reversed autism (Gkogkas et al., 2013; Wang and Doering, 2013). These studies thus support that mTOR signaling represents a potential therapeutic target for fragile X syndrome and other ASDs.

Glycogen synthase kinase-3

GSK3 is a serine/threonine kinase that exists in two isoforms (GSK3α and GSK3β) and regulates many cellular processes through phosphorylation of their substrates. The activity of GSK3 itself is controlled by inhibitory serine phosphorylation induced by various intracellular pathways including PI3K/Akt and MEK/ERK that converge on GSK3 (Cohen and Goedert, 2004; Jope and Roh, 2006; Sugden et al., 2008). In Fmr1 knockout mice, GSK3 phosphorylation was reduced in several brain regions resulting in elevated GSK3 signaling (Min et al., 2009; Mines et al., 2010; Yuskaitis et al., 2010). Lithium, a classical drug for psychiatric disorders, is a GSK3 inhibitor that both increases the inhibitory serine-phosphorylation of GSK3 and directly inhibits GSK3 activity (Chiu and Chuang, 2010; Mines and Jope, 2011). Since lithium has many other off-target effects including inhibition of inositol monophosphatase, more selective GSK3 inhibitors have been developed (Chiu and Chuang, 2010; Mines and Jope, 2011). Lithium, as well as the selective GSK3β inhibitor SB216763, was found to be able to correct mutant phenotypes (audiogenic seizure susceptibility and hyperactivity) of Fmr1 knockout mice. Particularly, lithium remained effective with chronic administration (Min et al., 2009). Acute or chronic lithium treatment could increase inhibitory serine phosphorylation of GSK3 in mouse brain; chronic treatment ameliorated alterations in open-field activity, elevated plus-maze and passive avoidance and impaired cognition in fragile X mice (Yuskaitis et al., 2010; King and Jope, 2013). Chronic treatment with SB216763 corrected hippocampus-dependent learning deficits as well as defects in adult neurogenesis in the hippocampus of fragile x mice (Guo et al., 2012). The specific GSK3 inhibitors TDZD-8 and VP0.7 corrected impairments in hippocampus-related cognitive tasks. Furthermore, the improvements in behaviors correlated to the rescue of deficits in NMDA receptor dependent LTP in the hippocampus of Fmr1 knockout mice as a result of GSK3 inhibition (Franklin et al., 2014). These studies thus support that targeting GSK3 may provide therapeutic benefits for fragile X syndrome.

In an open-label trial in 15 patients, the two month treatment with lithium was well-tolerated and had positive effects on behavior and adaptive skills in fragile X syndrome (Berry-Kravis et al., 2008). The placebo-controlled trials of lithium or other GSK3 inhibitors in fragile X syndrome will be warranted.

Targeting proteins regulated by FMRP

Matrix metalloproteinase 9

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are a family of extracellular proteases that are involved in synaptogenesis, neurotransmission and synaptic plasticity (Ethell and Ethell, 2007; Wright and Harding, 2009; Huntley, 2012). MPP9 mRNA is among the putative mRNA targets of FMRP with increased translation in the absence of FMRP (Janusz et al., 2013). MMP9 is necessary for the development of fragile X phenotypes. Genetic deletion of MMP9 rescued key features of fragile X syndrome, including dendritic spine abnormalities, exaggerated mGluR-LTD, aberrant cognitive and social behaviors as well as macroorchidism in the mouse model (Sidhu et al., 2014). Minocycline, a tetracycline analogue with anti-inflammatory and antiapoptotic activity, has been used to inhibit MMP9 (Bilousova et al., 2009; Siller and Broadie, 2012). Treatment of young mice with minocycline increased phosphorylation and subsequent membrane insertion of AMPA GluR1 receptors (Imbesi et al., 2008). Minocycline rescued maturation of dendritic spines in the hippocampus thereby correcting the spine phenotype in Fmr1 knockout mice (Bilousova et al., 2009). In addition, chronic minocycline reduced anxiety-related behavior, improved cognitive function in young Fmr1 knockout mice (Bilousova et al., 2009), and reversed impaired social communication during mating among fragile X mice (Rotschafer et al., 2012). In comparison of the effect of minocycline on young and adult fragile X mice, it was found that minocycline could reduce locomotor activity in both young and adult mice, some behavioral improvements could be long-lasting in young mice, but not in adults. In addition, minocycline reduced audiogenic seizure susceptibility in young mice (Dansie et al., 2013). This study provides further evidence that minocycline can produce long-lasting benefits in the fragile X animal model.

Clinical trials have been conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of minocycline. An open-label add-on pilot trial demonstrated that minocycline is well tolerated and can provide significant functional benefits to fragile X patients (Paribello et al., 2010). In a controlled clinical trial, minocycline treatment was observed to lower the elevated plasma activity of MMP9 in individuals with fragile X syndrome. In some cases, changes in MMP9 activity were found to be positively associated with improvement in clinical measures (Dziembowska et al., 2013). In another randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled and crossover trial, minocycline treatment administered for 3 months was found to be safe and produce greater global improvement than a placebo in children with fragile X syndrome (Leigh et al., 2013). However, longer trials are warranted to further assess the benefits and side effects related to minocycline.

p21-activated kinase

The small GTPase Rac1 and its effector p-21 activated kinase (PAK) are critical for regulation of actin polymerization, dendritic spine morphogenesis and synaptic plasticity (Hayashi et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2005; Kreis and Barnier, 2009; Murata and Constantine-Paton, 2013). In hippocampal synapses of Fmr1 knockout mice, physiological activation of the Rac-PAK signaling pathway is impaired (Chen et al., 2010). FMRP directly interacts with PAK1. Inhibition of PAK activity by expression of the dominant negative PAK (dnPAK) transgene results in a dendritic spine phenotype opposite to that of fragile X syndrome (Hayashi et al., 2007). A genetic expression of dnPAK in Fmr1 knockout mice at least partially corrected abnormalities in spine length and density in the cortex, and fully restored deficits in cortical LTP. Additionally, several behavioral abnormalities including hyperactivity, stereotypy, anxiety, and deficits in trace fear memory were ameliorated (Hayashi et al., 2007). This genetic rescue of fragile X phenotypes in the mouse model suggests that the PAK signaling pathway could be a novel intervention site for fragile X syndrome and autism. Pharmacological treatment with the PAK inhibitor FRAX486 reversed dendritic spine phenotypes, and rescued seizures and behavioral abnormalities such as hyperactivity and repetitive movements in Fmr1 knockout mice, further supporting PAK as a therapeutic target. Importantly, these effects could be achieved in adult Fmr1 knockout mice with a single administration of FRAX486, demonstrating the potential for therapy in adults with fragile X syndrome (Dolan et al., 2013).

Amyloid precursor protein

Amyloid precursor protein (APP) is a transmembrane protein that plays roles in synaptogenesis and synaptic plasticity (Gralle and Ferreira, 2007; Randall et al., 2010; Nalivaeva and Turner, 2013). APP is translated upon mGluR5 activation. FMRP binds to APP mRNA and controls its translation (Westmark and Malter, 2007). Absence of FMRP leads to APP overexpression and diminished mGluR-induced synthesis (Westmark and Malter, 2007). Cleavage of APP can produce β-amyloid (Aβ), which is overexpressed in the brain of Fmr1 knockout mice, suggesting a pathogenic role in fragile X syndrome (Westmark et al., 2010). Genetic reduction of APP/Aβ could partially or completely correct characteristic fragile X phenotypes, including audiogenic seizures, anxiety, dendritic spine morphology and exaggerated mGluR-LTD (Westmark et al., 2011), suggesting drugs directed at reducing Aβ in Alzheimer disease such as the secretase inhibitors or β-site APP cleaving enzyme (BACE-1) inhibitors may be applicable to fragile X syndrome (Malter et al., 2010; Westmark, 2013; Westmark et al., 2013).

Striatal-enriched protein tyrosine phosphatase

STEP, a brain-specific protein tyrosine phosphatase, dephosphorylates key signaling proteins including ERK1/2, p38 MAPK, the tyrosine kinase Fyn, and surface AMPA and NMDA receptors, thereby inactivating the kinases or promoting endocytosis of the receptors and opposing development of synaptic strengthening (Braithwaite et al., 2006; Goebel-Goody et al., 2012b). STEP is translated upon mGluR5 activation and mediates AMPA receptor internalization during mGluR-LTD (Zhang et al., 2008; Goebel-Goody and Lombroso, 2012). FMRP interacts with the transcript encoding STEP. The basal level of STEP is elevated and mGluR-dependent STEP synthesis is absent in Fmr1 knockout mice (Goebel-Goody et al., 2012a). It is possible that the synaptic deficits and behavioral abnormalities in fragile X syndrome may be linked to the dysregulation of STEP (Goebel-Goody and Lombroso, 2012). Genetic reduction of STEP could attenuate audiogenic seizures, improve characteristic social abnormalities, and reverse anxiety-related behaviors in Fmr1 knockout mice, suggesting that STEP might be a therapeutic target for treating fragile X patients (Goebel-Goody et al., 2012a).

Potassium channels

Potassium channels control the resting membrane potential and modulate the action potential waveform, mediating homeostasis of neuronal excitability (Misonou, 2010; Lee and Jan, 2012; Kim and Kaczmarek, 2014). In fragile X animal models, defects have been found in several types of potassium channels, such as the sodium-activated potassium Slack (Brown et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2012), voltage-gated potassium channels Kv3.1b (Strumbos et al., 2010) and Kv4.2 (Gross et al., 2011; Lee et al., 2011), and large-conductance calcium-activated potassium (BK) channels (Deng et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2014b).

FMRP interacts directly with Slack channels to enhance the channel activity, raising the possibility that Slack-FMRP interaction may link patterns of neuronal firing with changes in protein translation (Brown et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2012). Disturbance of this link when FMRP is absent may underlie altered neuronal networks in fragile X syndrome. FMRP binds the mRNAs encoding Kv3.1b and is required for rapid experience-dependent regulation of Kv3.1b (Strumbos et al., 2010). FMRP also regulates mRNA translation and protein expression of Kv4.2; absence of FMRP-mediated control of Kv4.2 might contribute to excess neuronal excitability in Fmr1 KO mice (Gross et al., 2011). Recovery of Kv4.2 after NMDA receptor-mediated degradation also requires FMRP, probably due to NMDA receptor activation-induced FMRP dephosphorylation, which turns off FMRP suppression of Kv4.2 (Lee et al., 2011). Significantly, treating hippocampal slices of fmr1 KO mice with Kv4 channel blocker HpTx2 restored LTP induced by moderate stimuli, suggesting that potassium channels as an FMRP target could be of potential relevance to fragile X therapy (Lee et al., 2011). FMRP modulates action potential duration via its interaction with beta4 subunits of BK channels, thus regulating neurotransmitter release and synaptic transmission. Loss of these FMRP functions might be responsible for dysregulation of synaptic transmission in fragile X syndrome (Deng et al., 2013). Interestingly, a recent study showed that a selective BK channel opener (BMS-204352) could rescue multiple behavioral impairments (social, emotional and cognitive) in fragile X mice (Hebert et al., 2014), further demonstrating that potassium channels may open up new opportunities for treating fragile X syndrome.

In summary, multiple targeted pharmacological treatments have been found to rescue the phenotypes of fragile X animal models, but few have been beneficial to patients. Acamprosate, lovastatin, lithium and minocycline are the drugs that can be currently prescribed and have shown benefits to patients with fragile X syndrome. However, each single drug may not be effective for all patients. The combination of different drug therapies, together with behavioral interventions, will be necessary for better efficacy in treating fragile X syndrome (Braat and Kooy, 2014; Hagerman et al., 2014; Hagerman and Polussa, 2015).

Targeted pharmacotherapy for Rett syndrome

RTT is a postnatal neurodevelopmental disorder that occurs mainly in females and is the leading cause of intellectual disability in this gender (Hagberg et al., 1983; Laurvick et al., 2006; Neul et al., 2010). Clinical presentation occurs in stages with an initial developmental stagnation that is followed by a rapid regression during which RTT individuals have autistic features, stereotypic hand movements, loss of language, and develop aggressive behaviors (Chahrour and Zoghbi, 2007; Percy et al., 2010). RTT girls also have seizures during childhood, daytime breathing arrythmias, dysautonomia, and develop scoliosis at later stages, which also include Parkinsonian features and loss of mobility (Glaze et al., 2010; Neul et al., 2014).

Loss-of-function mutations in the X-linked gene MECP2 (methyl-CpG-binding protein-2) are responsible for RTT (Amir et al., 1999). In 95% of classic RTT cases, MECP2 mutations occur de novo in germ cells and are usually on the paternal side (Girard et al., 2001; Trappe et al., 2001; Bienvenu and Chelly, 2006). There is a spectrum of mutations ranging from missense, nonsense, and frameshift mutations (Moretti and Zoghbi, 2006). RTT individuals appear to have a typical development until 6–18 months of age, when they start missing developmental milestones. The MECP2 gene encodes a predominantly nuclear protein that is expressed ubiquitously but with predominance in the brain (Klose and Bird, 2006). The expression of MECP2 follows a temporal pattern: it peaks in the early postnatal period when maturation of neurons and activity dependent refinement of synapses occurs (LaSalle et al., 2001; Shahbazian et al., 2002; Cohen et al., 2011). Its expression remains elevated during adulthood, when it is involved in the maintenance of existing neurons and synapses. MeCP2 was initially identified as a transcriptional repressor through its binding to methylated CpG sites in gene promoters (Nan et al., 1998; Jung et al., 2003), although it regulates gene expression through multiple mechanisms (Guy et al., 2011).

From multiple studies using different knockout mouse models, converging data indicates that the pathological deficit in RTT is at the microcircuit level involving the structure and function of synapses that are critical for synaptic transmission and plasticity (Chen et al., 2001; Guy et al., 2001, 2007; Figure 2). Therefore, most therapeutic treatments revolve around the restoration of synaptic function and maturation (Gadalla et al., 2011). Current preclinical research on therapeutic strategies and human clinical trials can be divided into drugs that target the primary cause, i.e., loss-of-function mutations in MECP2, and drugs that target downstream consequences, including neurotransmitter receptor systems, neurotrophins, and their intracellular signaling pathways (Tables 3, 4). Since this review is focused on pharmacological treatments, genetic manipulations will not be discussed here and readers are directed to recent reviews on this topic (Cobb et al., 2010; Gadalla et al., 2011; Guy et al., 2011). Treatment paradigms that have targeted pathways downstream of the Mecp2 gene in mice, and the current human clinical trials are discussed in detail below.

Figure 2

Growth and neurotrophic factors

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor

Bdnf, the gene encoding the BDNF protein, is one of the first recognized direct targets of MeCP2 transcriptional regulation (Chen et al., 2003; Martinowich et al., 2003). BDNF binds to the high affinity receptor tropomyosin-related kinase B (TrkB), which activates intracellular signaling cascades critical for neuronal development, synaptic maturation, and learning and memory, like PLCγ-IP3R, PI3K-Akt, and MAPK-CREB (Segal and Greenberg, 1996). Bdnf expression is controlled by MeCP2 through complex interactions (Chen et al., 2003; Chang et al., 2006; Li and Pozzo-Miller, 2014), and reduced levels of BDNF mRNA and protein are considered to contribute to the pathophysiological mechanisms of RTT disease progression (Katz, 2014). Over-expression of BDNF in excitatory forebrain neurons of Mecp2 deficient mice improved their RTT-like neurological phenotypes (Chang et al., 2006). Over-expression of BDNF rescued dendritic atrophy caused by shRNA-mediated Mecp2 knockdown in cultured hippocampal neurons (Chapleau et al., 2009). The main limitation of recombinant BDNF is its low blood-brain barrier permeability, which prompted the search for BDNF “boosters” or mimetics with sufficient bioavailability in brain.

Currently, there are two clinical trials in RTT individuals testing compounds that boost BDNF levels: a Phase-1 open label trial of Fingolimod, and a Phase-2 open label trial of glatiramer acetate (Copaxone), both FDA-aproved drugs for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Fingolimod is a modulator of the sphingosine-1 phosphate receptor, which leads to an increase in BDNF expression and activation of TrkB downstream signaling pathways (Deogracias et al., 2012). Glatiramer acetate is an immunomodulatory agent based on the amino acid structure of myelin basic protein (MBP) that is currently used for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. One of the proposed mechanisms of action of Copaxone is the increased expression and release of BDNF by autoreactive T-cells (Ziemssen et al., 2002).

Additonal potential leads with preclinical evidence include ampakines, which are known to increase BDNF expression by their action on AMPA-type glutamate receptors (Lauterborn et al., 2003). Peripheral treatment with ampakines significantly improved respiratory dysfunction in male Mecp2 knockout mice (Ogier et al., 2007) that model the recurrent apneas suffered by RTT girls. Cysteamine and its dimer cystamine increase BDNF levels (Borrell-Pagès et al., 2006), which supports the Phase-2/3 clinical trial of RP103 for Huntington’s disease. More recently, a small molecule BDNF loop mimetic (LM22A-4) designed in silico to interact with the BDNF binding pocket in the TrkB receptor (Massa et al., 2010), restored respiratory regularity in female Mecp2 heterozygous mice (Schmid et al., 2012; Kron et al., 2014).

Insulin Growth factor-1

Insulin Growth factor-1 (IGF-1) is a growth factor that, by binding to the IGF-1 receptor, activates similar intracellular signaling cascades to those triggered by BDNF activation of TrkB receptors. Indeed, IGF-1 modulates synaptic plasticity and neuronal maturation through a tyrosine kinase signaling pathway that includes PI3K-Akt and MAPK (Zheng and Quirion, 2004). Unlike BDNF, IGF-1 permeability through the blood brain barrier makes it an attractive compound for therapy. Intraperitoneal injection of the active IGF-1 tripeptide (also known as [1–3]IGF-1, or Glypromate) in male Mecp2 knockout mice improved survival, locomotor activity, as well as social and anxiety behaviors (Tropea et al., 2009). Full-length IGF-1 (Mecasermin) is already approved by the FDA for the treatment of growth failure in children, and it was shown to have similar effects in male Mecp2 knockout mice, as well as in female Mecp2 heterozygous mice (Castro et al., 2014); a cautionary note is that full-length IGF-1 can worsen the metabolic syndrome of Mecp2 deficient mice (Pitcher et al., 2013). The effects of full-length IGF-1 are due to the direct activation of IGF-1 receptors and its downstream signaling cascades, while the effects of the [1–3]IGF-1 tripeptide may reflect increased expression of IGF-1 (Corvin et al., 2012), although its molecular mechanism-of-action is currently unknown. Based on these promising leads, a Phase-2 double-blinded placebo-controlled clinical trail is underway to treat 3–10 years old RTT patients with full-length IGF-1 (Khwaja et al., 2014). More recently, a Phase-2 double-blinded placebo-controlled clinical trail in 16–45 years old RTT individuals has been initiated to test the efficacy of NNZ-2566, a protease-resistant analogue of the [1–3]IGF-1 tripeptide.

Neurotransmitter systems

Monoamines

Multiple studies have documented low levels of monoamine markers (dopamine, 5-HT, noradrenaline) in autopsy RTT brains and in Mecp2 deficient mice (Brücke et al., 1987; Lekman et al., 1989; Roux et al., 2008). Desipramine is an antidepressant that blocks the uptake of noradrenaline, and has been shown to reverse the depletion of tyrosine hydroxylase in the brainstem, helping with the regulation of breathing and extending the life-span of male Mecp2 knockout mice (Roux et al., 2007; Zanella et al., 2008). Desipramine is currently in a Phase-2 double blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial for RTT. The atypical tricyclic antidepressant tianeptine (REV-003) also improved respiratory activity in Mecp2 deficient mice, although this effect may reflect modulation of monoamine levels, glutamate receptor function, or BDNF levels (McEwen et al., 2010). Recently, preclinical studies in Mecp2 deficient mice have demonstrated that the 5-HT1a agonist Sarizotan inhibited expiratory neuron activity, which significantly improved breathing patterns and reduced the frequency of apneas (Abdala et al., 2014).

Glutamate

The NMDA-type of glutamate receptors is altered in Mecp2 knockout mice (Blue et al., 1999, 2011; Maliszewska-Cyna et al., 2010). Dextromethorphan is a NMDA receptor antagonist that has been tried in an open label clinical trial without any significant benefit. The FDA-approved NMDA receptor antagonist ketamine has been useful in Mecp2 knockout mice to improve RTT-like phenotypes (Kron et al., 2012); based on these encouraging results, a clinical trial of low dose ketamine is currently planned. A delay in the developmental switch in the expression of GluN2 subunits of the NMDA receptor in the visual cortex contributes to visual acuity deficits in Mecp2 deficient mice, which were improved by genetic deletion of the GluN2A subunit (Durand et al., 2012); a negative allosteric modulator selective for GluN2A-containing NMDA receptors is currently in preclinical trials in Mecp2 deficient mice.

GABA

Several studies have shown that GABAergic signaling is impaired in Mecp2 deficient mice, which alters the excitatory/inhibitory balance. Impaired GABAergic inhibition was described in the brainstem (Medrihan et al., 2008), thalamus (Zhang et al., 2010) and hippocampus (Calfa et al., 2015), and involved impaired evoked and spontaneous inhibitory synaptic transmission and numbers of GABAergic synapses on principal neurons. Furthermore, selective deletion of Mecp2 in GABAergic neurons led to impaired GABAergic transmission, cortical hyperexcitability and several neurological features of RTT and ASDs (Chao et al., 2010). Also, deletion of Mecp2 specifically in excitatory neurons caused impaired GABAergic transmission on cortical pyramidal neurons, which led to seizures and cortical hyperexcitation (Zhang et al., 2014a). A preclinical study in female Mecp2 heterozygous mice demonstrated that increasing ambient GABA levels by inhibiting the GABA reuptake transporter improved respiratory patterns (Abdala et al., 2010). Vigabatrin is an antiepileptic drug that irreversibly inhibits GABA transaminase, inhibits GABA catabolism and thereby increases GABA levels (Connelly, 1993). The drug is already FDA approved for use in epilepsy syndromes. Planning for a clinical trial for RTT is underway. However, retinal toxicity may limit the chronic use of this medication.

Mitochondrial function

RTT is associated with high levels of systemic oxidative stress and alteration in mitochondrial morphology, while plasma levels of oxidative stress biomarkers correlate with disease severity and progression (De Felice et al., 2012). Based on these observations, the small molecule EPI-743 was tested in a phase-2 placebo controlled trial of RTT individuals. Results from this exploratory trial revealed improvement in head growth but not in other core features of RTT. The structure of EPI-743 is based on vitamin E and its proposed mechanisms-of-action includes augmenting glutathione synthesis and acting at the mitochondrial level to regulate electron transport.

“Read-through” compounds to increase MECP2 expression

In approximately one-third of RTT individuals, a nonsense mutation in MECP2 (e.g., R168X, R255X) leads to the premature termination of transcripton due to a premature STOP codon (Schanen et al., 2004; Percy et al., 2007). Clinically, these RTT individuals have a more severe presentation than RTT individuals with missense MECP2 mutations that result in single amino acid substitutions. Aminoglycoside antibiotics like gentamycin are so-called “read-through” compounds because they allow ribosomal read-through of the premature STOP codon during translation, yielding a full-length functional protein. Aminoglycoside and non-aminoglycoside “read-through” compounds have been tested for therapeutic efficacy in Duchenne muscular dystrophy and cystic fibrosis (Zingman et al., 2007). Preclinical studies relevant to RTT have demonstrated that either gentamycin or geneticin were effective in translating a full-length functional MeCP2 protein in a lymphocyte cell line derived from an individual with a R255X nonsense mutation (Popescu et al., 2010), and in transgenic mice expressing a R168X nonsense mutation (Brendel et al., 2011). Furthermore, gentamycin increased dendritic spine density in neurons derived from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) that were obtained from a RTT individual with a Q244X nonsense mutation (Marchetto et al., 2010). However, the renal and auditory toxicity of gentamycin has limited its progress toward human clinical trials and prompted the development of new “read-through” compounds with better safety profiles.

Open questions and challenges

Design and quality of preclinical studies

Although many targeted treatments have shown efficacy across multiple aspects in ASD animal models, none has thus far demonstrated the same effectiveness in patients (Katz et al., 2012; Hagerman et al., 2014). Hurdles to translational success may include lack of rigorous standards in assessing the effect of treatment, lack of transparency in reporting preclinical data, as well as publication bias caused by disregarding negative results in preclinical studies (Katz et al., 2012). The translational success stories in fragile X and Rett syndromes indicates that the effectiveness of targeted treatments in animal models can turn into clinical efficacy in humans, provided that studies are well designed, the models are reliable and robust, and that preclinical outcome measures are relevant to patients (Anagnostou, 2012; Lipton and Sahin, 2013; Castro et al., 2014; Khwaja et al., 2014). To achieve more translational success in ASDs, efforts are needed to improve the quality of preclinical studies in the future. Strict standards must be implemented for preclinical study designs and result reporting to ensure that clinical trials are grounded on reliable preclinical data (Katz et al., 2012; Landis et al., 2012).

One of the key issues in preclinical studies is that almost every study has applied its own animal behavioral experiment battery to evaluate the effects of genetic or pharmacological manipulations, making comparison of efficacy among different treatments a challenge. This situation will be greatly improved if animal behavioral test batteries for identifying potential therapy could be standardized. Despite the discrepancies in test batteries from different laboratories, many of the targeted treatments achieve predicted effect and rescue at least part of phenotypic features of the disorders in animal models (Braat and Kooy, 2014; Hagerman et al., 2014).

Challenges in clinical trials

Despite progress made in clinical trials, one of the major concerns for these studies is the lack of appropriate outcome measures for an objective assessment of patients’ daily performance (Berry-Kravis et al., 2011; Wijetunge et al., 2013; Berry-Kravis, 2014; Braat and Kooy, 2014; Jacquemont et al., 2014). As a result, some improvements following therapeutic intervention might not be observed without the right measurements. It is helpful that researchers have been trying to formulate suitable outcome measures, which could be adjusted accordingly for patients (Berry-Kravis et al., 2013), such as quantitative event related potential and expressive language outcome measure which have been developed for fragile X patients (Hessl et al., 2009). It is anticipated that these measures will better demonstrate improvements in language and cognition in individual patients. In addition, molecular markers, such as ERK, BDNF and MMP9, can be measured to provide a direct biochemical evidence of improvement with targeted treatments (Hagerman et al., 2014).

Differential responses to one specific treatment have been observed in individuals with ASDs. Some subgroups within the patient cohorts respond to the therapy where others do not, as evident from clinical trials in fragile X syndrome (Jacquemont et al., 2011; Berry-Kravis et al., 2012). It is therefore important and helpful to develop biomarkers for selection of patients that will benefit from a specific therapy depending on their genotypes and/or neurobiological phenotypes. For example, if follow-up studies would confirm that AFQ056 treatment significantly improves behavior in fully methylated patients, detecting the methylation status of Fmr1 promoter might help identify a subgroup of fragile X patients that will respond well to this treatment (Jacquemont et al., 2011; Braat and Kooy, 2014).

Interference with the molecular pathways disturbed in ASDs has led to the initiation of clinical trials. The fragile X and Rett syndromes are the prototypes of neurodevelopmental disorders for which targeted treatments are becoming realities (Samaco and Neul, 2011; Chapleau et al., 2013a,b; Braat and Kooy, 2014). However, it is unlikely that a single compound will be effective in all individuals with ASDs. Thus, it will be necessary to test combinations of multiple drugs that each rescue part of clinical presentations to find a combination of drugs that works more efficiently than each on its own. Importantly, pharmaceutical interventions need to be paired with appropriate behavioral and cognitive training to maximize the efficacy. This represents a significant step towards more personalized approaches to treating fragile X, RTT and other ASDs in future, with a better chance of success (Castro et al., 2013; Wijetunge et al., 2013; Braat and Kooy, 2014; Hagerman et al., 2014).

The timing of treatment initiation

It is generally believed that earlier interventions in developmental disorders will have better outcomes. Abnormalities occurring during early development have usually been considered irreversible in adulthood. However, studies in mouse models of neurodevelopmental disorders, including fragile X and Rett syndromes, suggest that many pathophysiological aspects associated with the disorders can be reversed by genetic or pharmacological manipulations performed during adulthood (Castrén et al., 2012). Improvements have also been observed in adult patients with fragile X syndrome treated with arbaclofen and AFQ056 (Jacquemont et al., 2011; Henderson et al., 2012). These findings suggest that the pathophysiology associated with the loss of FMRP or MeCP2 may not arise from irreversible developmental brain abnormalities, but result from functional disturbances of neural circuits that could be corrected in adulthood, providing a potential rational basis for treatment of neurodevelopmental disorders in adulthood (Castrén et al., 2012; Wijetunge et al., 2013; Hagerman et al., 2014). Despite these exciting advances, translation from animal experimentation to clinical practice and finding out the right initiation timing for treating individual patients will be challenging issues in future investigation (Castrén et al., 2012; Wijetunge et al., 2013).

Conclusions

The increasing need for effective treatments of fragile X and Rett syndromes, coupled with the availability of animal models and iPSC-derived neurons from human individuals with these disorders (Marchetto et al., 2010; Wang and Doering, 2012), has promoted translational studies towards identifying potential therapeutics. New opportunities are now emerging that might lead to development of novel pharmacotherapies for patients with fragile X and Rett syndromes. The development of mechanism-based targeted treatments will require more extensive multidisciplinary researches (Chapleau et al., 2013a; Berry-Kravis, 2014; Braat and Kooy, 2014; Hagerman et al., 2014). It is the responsibility of the research community to rigorously validate disease models, outcome measures and study designs that will produce robust and reproducible preclinical findings with clear relevance to human diseases (Katz et al., 2012; Landis et al., 2012).

The rational therapeutics for ASDs requires the knowledge of an entire spectrum of symptoms that relate to each specific disorder. The complicated pathophysiology of fragile X and Rett syndromes should be taken fully into account in designing preclinical and clinical studies. It should be recognized that loss of FMRP or MeCP2 will affect a number of downstream targets which exist not only on neurons, but on glial cells and other tissues (McCauley et al., 2011; Cheng et al., 2012; Derecki et al., 2013; Ausió et al., 2014); that the loss can have direct, as well as indirect and cumulative effects on development and function of the central nervous system or other organs, leading to distinct phenotypic consequences that possibly require different treatment strategies. Understanding these complexities will be essential for selecting relative therapeutics for patients (Chapleau et al., 2013a,b; Delorme et al., 2013; Berry-Kravis, 2014; Hagerman et al., 2014). It is inspiring to see that fragile X and Rett syndromes are becoming role models for how research in animal models could be translated into patients and how management of symptoms of the diseases could extend and improve the quality of life, providing further insights into understanding and treating ASDs and other neurodevelopmental diseases.

References

• 1

  AbdalaA. P.DutschmannM.BissonnetteJ. M.PatonJ. F. (2010). Correction of respiratory disorders in a mouse model of Rett syndrome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A107, 18208–18213. 10.1073/pnas.1012104107

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2

  AbdalaA. P.LioyD. T.GargS. K.KnoppS. J.PatonJ. F.BissonnetteJ. M. (2014). Effect of Sarizotan, a 5-HT1a and D2-like receptor agonist, on respiration in three mouse models of Rett syndrome. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.50, 1031–1039. 10.1165/rcmb.2013-0372OC

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3

  AbekhoukhS.BardoniB. (2014). CYFIP family proteins between autism and intellectual disability: links with Fragile X syndrome. Front. Cell. Neurosci.8:81. 10.3389/fncel.2014.00081

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4

  AmirR. E.Van den VeyverI. B.WanM.TranC. Q.FranckeU.ZoghbiH. Y. (1999). Rett syndrome is caused by mutations in X-linked MECP2, encoding methyl-CpG-binding protein 2. Nat. Genet.23, 185–188. 10.1038/13810

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5

  AnagnostouE. (2012). Translational medicine: mice and men show the way. Nature491, 196–197. 10.1038/491196a

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6

  AnagnostouE.SooryaL.BrianJ.DupuisA.MankadD.SmileS.et al. (2014a). Intranasal oxytocin in the treatment of autism spectrum disorders: a review of literature and early safety and efficacy data in youth. Brain Res.1580, 188–198. 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.01.049

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7

  AnagnostouE.ZwaigenbaumL.SzatmariP.FombonneE.FernandezB. A.Woodbury-SmithM.et al. (2014b). Autism spectrum disorder: advances in evidence-based practice. CMAJ186, 509–519. 10.1503/cmaj.121756

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8

  AndariE.DuhamelJ. R.ZallaT.HerbrechtE.LeboyerM.SiriguA. (2010). Promoting social behavior with oxytocin in high-functioning autism spectrum disorders. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A107, 4389–4394. 10.1073/pnas.0910249107

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9

  AuerbachB. D.OsterweilE. K.BearM. F. (2011). Mutations causing syndromic autism define an axis of synaptic pathophysiology. Nature480, 63–68. 10.1038/nature10658

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10

  AusióJ.de PazA. M.EstellerM. (2014). MeCP2: the long trip from a chromatin protein to neurological disorders. Trends Mol. Med.20, 487–498. 10.1016/j.molmed.2014.03.004

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11

  BanerjeeS.RiordanM.BhatM. A. (2014). Genetic aspects of autism spectrum disorders: insights from animal models. Front. Cell. Neurosci.8:58. 10.3389/fncel.2014.00058

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12

  BassellG. J.WarrenS. T. (2008). Fragile X syndrome: loss of local mRNA regulation alters synaptic development and function. Neuron60, 201–214. 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.10.004

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13

  BearM. F.HuberK. M.WarrenS. T. (2004). The mGluR theory of fragile X mental retardation. Trends Neurosci.27, 370–377. 10.1016/j.tins.2004.04.009

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14

  Ben-AriY.KhalilovI.KahleK. T.CherubiniE. (2012). The GABA excitatory/inhibitory shift in brain maturation and neurological disorders. Neuroscientist18, 467–486. 10.1177/1073858412438697

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15

  Berry-KravisE. (2014). Mechanism-based treatments in neurodevelopmental disorders: fragile X syndrome. Pediatr. Neurol.50, 297–302. 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2013.12.001

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16

  Berry-KravisE.HesslD.AbbedutoL.ReissA. L.Beckel-MitchenerA.UrvT. K. (2013). Outcome measures for clinical trials in fragile X syndrome. J. Dev. Behav. Pediatr.34, 508–522. 10.1097/DBP.0b013e31829d1f20

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 17

  Berry-KravisE.HesslD.CoffeyS.HerveyC.SchneiderA.YuhasJ.et al. (2009). A pilot open label, single dose trial of fenobam in adults with fragile X syndrome. J. Med. Genet.46, 266–271. 10.1136/jmg.2008.063701

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18

  Berry-KravisE. M.HesslD.RathmellB.ZarevicsP.CherubiniM.Walton-BowenK.et al. (2012). Effects of STX209 (arbaclofen) on neurobehavioral function in children and adults with fragile X syndrome: a randomized, controlled, phase 2 trial. Sci. Transl. Med.4:152ra127. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3004214

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19

  Berry-KravisE.KnoxA.HerveyC. (2011). Targeted treatments for fragile X syndrome. J. Neurodev. Disord.3, 193–210. 10.1007/s11689-011-9074-7

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20

  Berry-KravisE.KrauseS. E.BlockS. S.GuterS.WuuJ.LeurgansS.et al. (2006). Effect of CX516, an AMPA-modulating compound, on cognition and behavior in fragile X syndrome: a controlled trial. J. Child Adolesc. Psychopharmacol.16, 525–540. 10.1089/cap.2006.16.525

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21

  Berry-KravisE.SumisA.HerveyC.NelsonM.PorgesS. W.WengN.et al. (2008). Open-label treatment trial of lithium to target the underlying defect in fragile X syndrome. J. Dev. Behav. Pediatr.29, 293–302. 10.1097/DBP.0b013e31817dc447

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 22

  BhakarA. L.DolenG.BearM. F. (2012). The pathophysiology of fragile, X (and what it teaches us about synapses). Annu. Rev. Neurosci.35, 417–443. 10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-153138

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23

  BhattacharyaA.KaphzanH.Alvarez-DieppaA. C.MurphyJ. P.PierreP.KlannE. (2012). Genetic removal of p70 S6 kinase 1 corrects molecular, synaptic and behavioral phenotypes in fragile X syndrome mice. Neuron76, 325–337. 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.07.022

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24

  BienvenuT.ChellyJ. (2006). Molecular genetics of Rett syndrome: when DNA methylation goes unrecognized. Nat. Rev. Genet.7, 415–426. 10.1038/nrg1878

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25

  BilousovaT. V.DansieL.NgoM.AyeJ.CharlesJ. R.EthellD. W.et al. (2009). Minocycline promotes dendritic spine maturation and improves behavioural performance in the fragile X mouse model. J. Med. Genet.46, 94–102. 10.1136/jmg.2008.061796

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 26

  BlueM. E.KaufmannW. E.BresslerJ.EyringC.O’driscollC.NaiduS.et al. (2011). Temporal and regional alterations in NMDA receptor expression in Mecp2-null mice. Anat. Rec. (Hoboken)294, 1624–1634. 10.1002/ar.21380

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27

  BlueM. E.NaiduS.JohnstonM. V. (1999). Development of amino acid receptors in frontal cortex from girls with Rett syndrome. Ann. Neurol.45, 541–545. 10.1002/1531-8249(199904)45:4<541::aid-ana21>3.0.co;2-2

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 28

  BodaB.MendezP.Boury-JamotB.MagaraF.MullerD. (2014). Reversal of activity-mediated spine dynamics and learning impairment in a mouse model of Fragile X syndrome. Eur. J. Neurosci.39, 1130–1137. 10.1111/ejn.12488

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29

  Borrell-PagèsM.CanalsJ. M.CordelièresF. P.ParkerJ. A.PinedaJ. R.GrangeG.et al. (2006). Cystamine and cysteamine increase brain levels of BDNF in Huntington disease via HSJ1b and transglutaminase. J. Clin. Invest.116, 1410–1424. 10.1172/jci27607

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30

  BortolottoZ. A.FitzjohnS. M.CollingridgeG. L. (1999). Roles of metabotropic glutamate receptors in LTP and LTD in the hippocampus. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.9, 299–304. 10.1016/s0959-4388(99)80044-0

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31

  BraatS.KooyR. F. (2014). Fragile X syndrome neurobiology translates into rational therapy. Drug Discov. Today19, 510–519. 10.1016/j.drudis.2014.01.013

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32

  BraithwaiteS. P.PaulS.NairnA. C.LombrosoP. J. (2006). Synaptic plasticity: one STEP at a time. Trends Neurosci.29, 452–458. 10.1016/j.tins.2006.06.007

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 33

  BrendelC.BelakhovV.WernerH.WegenerE.GärtnerJ.NudelmanI.et al. (2011). Readthrough of nonsense mutations in Rett syndrome: evaluation of novel aminoglycosides and generation of a new mouse model. J. Mol. Med. (Berl.)89, 389–398. 10.1007/s00109-010-0704-4

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34

  BrownM. R.KronengoldJ.GazulaV. R.ChenY.StrumbosJ. G.SigworthF. J.et al. (2010). Fragile X mental retardation protein controls gating of the sodium-activated potassium channel slack. Nat. Neurosci.13, 819–821. 10.1038/nn.2563

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35

  BrückeT.SoficE.KillianW.RettA.RiedererP. (1987). Reduced concentrations and increased metabolism of biogenic amines in a single case of Rett-syndrome: a postmortem brain study. J. Neural Transm.68, 315–324. 10.1007/bf02098506

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 36

  BurketJ. A.BensonA. D.TangA. H.DeutschS. I. (2014). Rapamycin improves sociability in the BTBR T(+)Itpr3(tf)/J mouse model of autism spectrum disorders. Brain Res. Bull.100, 70–75. 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2013.11.005

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37

  Busquets-GarciaA.Gomis-GonzálezM.GueganT.Agustín-PavónC.PastorA.MatoS.et al. (2013). Targeting the endocannabinoid system in the treatment of fragile X syndrome. Nat. Med.19, 603–607. 10.1038/nm.3127

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 38

  ÇakuA.PellerinD.BouvierP.RiouE.CorbinF. (2014). Effect of lovastatin on behavior in children and adults with fragile X syndrome: an open-label study. Am. J. Med. Genet. A164A, 2834–2842. 10.1002/ajmg.a.36750

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 39

  CalfaG.LiW.RutherfordJ. M.Pozzo-MillerL. (2015). Excitation/inhibition imbalance and impaired synaptic inhibition in hippocampal area CA3 of Mecp2 knockout mice. Hippocampus25, 159–168. 10.1002/hipo.22360

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 40

  CastrénE.ElgersmaY.MaffeiL.HagermanR. (2012). Treatment of neurodevelopmental disorders in adulthood. J. Neurosci.32, 14074–14079. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3287-12.2012

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 41

  CastroJ.GarciaR. I.KwokS.BanerjeeA.PetraviczJ.WoodsonJ.et al. (2014). Functional recovery with recombinant human IGF1 treatment in a mouse model of Rett syndrome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A111, 9941–9946. 10.1073/pnas.1311685111

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 42

  CastroJ.MelliosN.SurM. (2013). Mechanisms and therapeutic challenges in autism spectrum disorders: insights from Rett syndrome. Curr. Opin. Neurol.26, 154–159. 10.1097/WCO.0b013e32835f19a7

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 43

  CerovicM.d’IsaR.ToniniR.BrambillaR. (2013). Molecular and cellular mechanisms of dopamine-mediated behavioral plasticity in the striatum. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem.105, 63–80. 10.1016/j.nlm.2013.06.013

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 44

  ChahrourM.ZoghbiH. Y. (2007). The story of Rett syndrome: from clinic to neurobiology. Neuron56, 422–437. 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.001

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 45

  ChangS.BrayS. M.LiZ.ZarnescuD. C.HeC.JinP.et al. (2008). Identification of small molecules rescuing fragile X syndrome phenotypes in Drosophila. Nat. Chem. Biol.4, 256–263. 10.1038/nchembio.78

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 46

  ChangQ.KhareG.DaniV.NelsonS.JaenischR. (2006). The disease progression of Mecp2 mutant mice is affected by the level of BDNF expression. Neuron49, 341–348. 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.12.027

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 47

  ChaoH. T.ChenH.SamacoR. C.XueM.ChahrourM.YooJ.et al. (2010). Dysfunction in GABA signalling mediates autism-like stereotypies and Rett syndrome phenotypes. Nature468, 263–269. 10.1038/nature09582

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 48

  ChapleauC. A.LaneJ.LarimoreJ.LiW.Pozzo-MillerL.PercyA. K. (2013b). Recent progress in Rett syndrome and MeCP2 Dysfunction: assessment of potential treatment options. Future Neurol.8, 21–28. 10.2217/fnl.12.79

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 49

  ChapleauC. A.LaneJ.Pozzo-MillerL.PercyA. K. (2013a). Evaluation of current pharmacological treatment options in the management of Rett syndrome: from the present to future therapeutic alternatives. Curr. Clin. Pharmacol.8, 358–369. 10.2174/15748847113086660069

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 50

  ChapleauC. A.LarimoreJ. L.TheibertA.Pozzo-MillerL. (2009). Modulation of dendritic spine development and plasticity by BDNF and vesicular trafficking: fundamental roles in neurodevelopmental disorders associated with mental retardation and autism. J. Neurodev. Disord.1, 185–196. 10.1007/s11689-009-9027-6

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 51

  ChenR. Z.AkbarianS.TudorM.JaenischR. (2001). Deficiency of methyl-CpG binding protein-2 in CNS neurons results in a Rett-like phenotype in mice. Nat. Genet.27, 327–331. 10.1038/85906

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 52

  ChenW. G.ChangQ.LinY.MeissnerA.WestA. E.GriffithE. C.et al. (2003). Derepression of BDNF transcription involves calcium-dependent phosphorylation of MeCP2. Science302, 885–889. 10.1126/science.1086446

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 53

  ChenL. Y.RexC. S.BabayanA. H.KramárE. A.LynchG.GallC. M.et al. (2010). Physiological activation of synaptic Rac>PAK (p-21 activated kinase) signaling is defective in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome. J. Neurosci.30, 10977–10984. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1077-10.2010

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 54

  ChengC.SourialM.DoeringL. C. (2012). Astrocytes and developmental plasticity in fragile X. Neural Plast.2012:197491. 10.1155/2012/197491

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 55

  ChevaleyreV.TakahashiK. A.CastilloP. E. (2006). Endocannabinoid-mediated synaptic plasticity in the CNS. Annu. Rev. Neurosci.29, 37–76. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112834

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 56

  ChezM. G.BurtonQ.DowlingT.ChangM.KhannaP.KramerC. (2007). Memantine as adjunctive therapy in children diagnosed with autistic spectrum disorders: an observation of initial clinical response and maintenance tolerability. J. Child Neurol.22, 574–579. 10.1177/0883073807302611

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 57

  ChiuC. T.ChuangD. M. (2010). Molecular actions and therapeutic potential of lithium in preclinical and clinical studies of CNS disorders. Pharmacol. Ther.128, 281–304. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2010.07.006

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 58

  ChuganiD. C. (2002). Role of altered brain serotonin mechanisms in autism. Mol. Psychiatry7(Suppl. 2), S16–S17. 10.1038/sj.mp.4001167

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 59

  CobbS.GuyJ.BirdA. (2010). Reversibility of functional deficits in experimental models of Rett syndrome. Biochem. Soc. Trans.38, 498–506. 10.1042/BST0380498

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 60

  CohenS.GabelH. W.HembergM.HutchinsonA. N.SadaccaL. A.EbertD. H.et al. (2011). Genome-wide activity-dependent MeCP2 phosphorylation regulates nervous system development and function. Neuron72, 72–85. 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.08.022

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 61

  CohenP.GoedertM. (2004). GSK3 inhibitors: development and therapeutic potential. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.3, 479–487. 10.1038/nrd1415

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 62

  ConnellyJ. F. (1993). Vigabatrin. Ann. Pharmacother.27, 197–204.

  • Google Scholar

• 63

  CorvinA. P.MolinosI.LittleG.DonohoeG.GillM.MorrisD. W.et al. (2012). Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) and its active peptide (1–3)IGF1 enhance the expression of synaptic markers in neuronal circuits through different cellular mechanisms. Neurosci. Lett.520, 51–56. 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.05.029

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 64

  CostaL.SpatuzzaM.D’AntoniS.BonaccorsoC. M.TrovatoC.MusumeciS. A.et al. (2012). Activation of 5-HT7 serotonin receptors reverses metabotropic glutamate receptor-mediated synaptic plasticity in wild-type and Fmr1 knockout mice, a model of Fragile X syndrome. Biol. Psychiatry72, 924–933. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.06.008

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 65

  CuestoG.Enriquez-BarretoL.CaramésC.CantareroM.GasullX.SandiC.et al. (2011). Phosphoinositide-3-kinase activation controls synaptogenesis and spinogenesis in hippocampal neurons. J. Neurosci.31, 2721–2733. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4477-10.2011

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 66

  CuriaG.GualtieriF.BartolomeoR.VezzaliR.BiaginiG. (2013). Resilience to audiogenic seizures is associated with p-ERK1/2 dephosphorylation in the subiculum of Fmr1 knockout mice. Front. Cell. Neurosci.7:46. 10.3389/fncel.2013.00046

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 67

  DansieL. E.PhommahaxayK.OkusanyaA. G.UwadiaJ.HuangM.RotschaferS. E.et al. (2013). Long-lasting effects of minocycline on behavior in young but not adult Fragile X mice. Neuroscience246, 186–198. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.04.058

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 68

  DarnellJ. C.KlannE. (2013). The translation of translational control by FMRP: therapeutic targets for FXS. Nat. Neurosci.16, 1530–1536. 10.1038/nn.3379

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 69

  De FeliceC.SignoriniC.LeonciniS.PecorelliA.DurandT.ValacchiG.et al. (2012). The role of oxidative stress in Rett syndrome: an overview. Ann. N Y Acad. Sci.1259, 121–135. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06611.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 70

  DelormeR.EyE.ToroR.LeboyerM.GillbergC.BourgeronT. (2013). Progress toward treatments for synaptic defects in autism. Nat. Med.19, 685–694. 10.1038/nm.3193

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 71

  DengP. Y.RotmanZ.BlundonJ. A.ChoY.CuiJ.CavalliV.et al. (2013). FMRP regulates neurotransmitter release and synaptic information transmission by modulating action potential duration via BK channels. Neuron77, 696–711. 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.12.018

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 72

  DeograciasR.YazdaniM.DekkersM. P.GuyJ.IonescuM. C.VogtK. E.et al. (2012). Fingolimod, a sphingosine-1 phosphate receptor modulator, increases BDNF levels and improves symptoms of a mouse model of Rett syndrome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A109, 14230–14235. 10.1073/pnas.1206093109

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 73

  DereckiN. C.CronkJ. C.KipnisJ. (2013). The role of microglia in brain maintenance: implications for Rett syndrome. Trends Immunol.34, 144–150. 10.1016/j.it.2012.10.002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 74

  DevlinB.CookE. H.Jr.CoonH.DawsonG.GrigorenkoE. L.McMahonW.et al. (2005). Autism and the serotonin transporter: the long and short of it. Mol. Psychiatry10, 1110–1116. 10.1038/sj.mp.4001724

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 75

  de VrijF. M.LevengaJ.van der LindeH. C.KoekkoekS. K.De ZeeuwC. I.NelsonD. L.et al. (2008). Rescue of behavioral phenotype and neuronal protrusion morphology in Fmr1 KO mice. Neurobiol. Dis.31, 127–132. 10.1016/j.nbd.2008.04.002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 76

  D’HulstC.De GeestN.ReeveS. P.Van DamD.De DeynP. P.HassanB. A.et al. (2006). Decreased expression of the GABAA receptor in fragile X syndrome. Brain Res.1121, 238–245. 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.08.115

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 77

  D’HulstC.HeulensI.BrouwerJ. R.WillemsenR.De GeestN.ReeveS. P.et al. (2009). Expression of the GABAergic system in animal models for fragile X syndrome and fragile X associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS). Brain Res.1253, 176–183. 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.11.075

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 78

  DolanB. M.DuronS. G.CampbellD. A.VollrathB.Shankaranarayana RaoB. S.KoH. Y.et al. (2013). Rescue of fragile X syndrome phenotypes in Fmr1 KO mice by the small-molecule PAK inhibitor FRAX486. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A110, 5671–5676. 10.1073/pnas.1219383110

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 79

  DölenG.BearM. F. (2008). Role for metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) in the pathogenesis of fragile X syndrome. J. Physiol.586, 1503–1508. 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.150722

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 80

  DollC. A.BroadieK. (2014). Impaired activity-dependent neural circuit assembly and refinement in autism spectrum disorder genetic models. Front. Cell. Neurosci.8:30. 10.3389/fncel.2014.00030

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 81

  DomesG.HeinrichsM.KumbierE.GrossmannA.HauensteinK.HerpertzS. C. (2013). Effects of intranasal oxytocin on the neural basis of face processing in autism spectrum disorder. Biol. Psychiatry74, 164–171. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.02.007

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 82

  DurandS.PatriziA.QuastK. B.HachigianL.PavlyukR.SaxenaA.et al. (2012). NMDA receptor regulation prevents regression of visual cortical function in the absence of Mecp2. Neuron76, 1078–1090. 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.12.004

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 83

  DziembowskaM.PrettoD. I.JanuszA.KaczmarekL.LeighM. J.GabrielN.et al. (2013). High MMP-9 activity levels in fragile X syndrome are lowered by minocycline. Am. J. Med. Genet. A161A, 1897–1903. 10.1002/ajmg.a.36023

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 84

  EadieB. D.CushmanJ.KannangaraT. S.FanselowM. S.ChristieB. R. (2012). NMDA receptor hypofunction in the dentate gyrus and impaired context discrimination in adult Fmr1 knockout mice. Hippocampus22, 241–254. 10.1002/hipo.20890

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 85

  EbertD. H.GreenbergM. E. (2013). Activity-dependent neuronal signalling and autism spectrum disorder. Nature493, 327–337. 10.1038/nature11860

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 86

  EricksonC. A.ChambersJ. E. (2006). Memantine for disruptive behavior in autistic disorder. J. Clin. Psychiatry67:1000. 10.4088/jcp.v67n0619h

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 87

  EricksonC. A.MullettJ. E.McDougleC. J. (2009). Open-label memantine in fragile X syndrome. J. Autism Dev. Disord.39, 1629–1635. 10.1007/s10803-009-0807-3

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 88

  EricksonC. A.MullettJ. E.McDougleC. J. (2010). Brief report: acamprosate in fragile X syndrome. J. Autism Dev. Disord.40, 1412–1416. 10.1007/s10803-010-0988-9

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 89

  EricksonC. A.WinkL. K.RayB.EarlyM. C.StiegelmeyerE.Mathieu-FrasierL.et al. (2013). Impact of acamprosate on behavior and brain-derived neurotrophic factor: an open-label study in youth with fragile X syndrome. Psychopharmacology (Berl)228, 75–84. 10.1007/s00213-013-3022-z

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 90

  EthellI. M.EthellD. W. (2007). Matrix metalloproteinases in brain development and remodeling: synaptic functions and targets. J. Neurosci. Res.85, 2813–2823. 10.1002/jnr.21273

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 91

  FranklinA. V.KingM. K.PalomoV.MartinezA.McMahonL. L.JopeR. S. (2014). Glycogen synthase kinase-3 inhibitors reverse deficits in long-term potentiation and cognition in fragile X mice. Biol. Psychiatry75, 198–206. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.08.003

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 92

  FulksJ. L.O’BryhimB. E.WenzelS. K.FowlerS. C.VorontsovaE.PinkstonJ. W.et al. (2010). Dopamine release and uptake impairments and behavioral alterations observed in mice that model fragile X mental retardation syndrome. ACS Chem. Neurosci.1, 679–690. 10.1021/cn100032f

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 93

  GadallaK. K.BaileyM. E.CobbS. R. (2011). MeCP2 and Rett syndrome: reversibility and potential avenues for therapy. Biochem. J.439, 1–14. 10.1042/bj20110648

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 94

  GandhiR. M.KoganC. S.MessierC. (2014). 2-Methyl-6-(phenylethynyl) pyridine (MPEP) reverses maze learning and PSD-95 deficits in Fmr1 knock-out mice. Front. Cell. Neurosci.8:70. 10.3389/fncel.2014.00070

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 95

  GantoisI.PopA. S.de EschC. E.BuijsenR. A.PootersT.Gomez-MancillaB.et al. (2013). Chronic administration of AFQ056/Mavoglurant restores social behaviour in Fmr1 knockout mice. Behav. Brain Res.239, 72–79. 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.10.059

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 96

  GarberK. B.VisootsakJ.WarrenS. T. (2008). Fragile X syndrome. Eur. J. Hum. Genet.16, 666–672. 10.1038/ejhg.2008.61

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 97

  GassmannM.BettlerB. (2012). Regulation of neuronal GABA(B) receptor functions by subunit composition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci.13, 380–394. 10.1038/nrn3249

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 98

  GellynckE.HeyninckK.AndressenK. W.HaegemanG.LevyF. O.VanhoenackerP.et al. (2013). The serotonin 5-HT7 receptors: two decades of research. Exp. Brain Res.230, 555–568. 10.1007/s00221-013-3694-y

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 99

  GirardM.CouvertP.CarriéA.TardieuM.ChellyJ.BeldjordC.et al. (2001). Parental origin of de novo MECP2 mutations in Rett syndrome. Eur. J. Hum. Genet.9, 231–236. 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200618

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 100

  GkogkasC. G.KhoutorskyA.RanI.RampakakisE.NevarkoT.WeatherillD. B.et al. (2013). Autism-related deficits via dysregulated eIF4E-dependent translational control. Nature493, 371–377. 10.1038/nature11628

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 101

  GlazeD. G.PercyA. K.SkinnerS.MotilK. J.NeulJ. L.BarrishJ. O.et al. (2010). Epilepsy and the natural history of Rett syndrome. Neurology74, 909–912. 10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181d6b852

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 102

  GocelJ.LarsonJ. (2012). Synaptic NMDA receptor-mediated currents in anterior piriform cortex are reduced in the adult fragile X mouse. Neuroscience221, 170–181. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.06.052

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 103

  Goebel-GoodyS. M.BaumM.PaspalasC. D.FernandezS. M.CartyN. C.KurupP.et al. (2012b). Therapeutic implications for striatal-enriched protein tyrosine phosphatase (STEP) in neuropsychiatric disorders. Pharmacol. Rev.64, 65–87. 10.1124/pr.110.003053

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 104

  Goebel-GoodyS. M.LombrosoP. J. (2012). Taking STEPs forward to understand fragile X syndrome. Results Probl. Cell Differ.54, 223–241. 10.1007/978-3-642-21649-7_12

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 105

  Goebel-GoodyS. M.Wilson-WallisE. D.RoystonS.TagliatelaS. M.NaegeleJ. R.LombrosoP. J. (2012a). Genetic manipulation of STEP reverses behavioral abnormalities in a fragile X syndrome mouse model. Genes Brain Behav.11, 586–600. 10.1111/j.1601-183x.2012.00781.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 106

  GordonI.Vander WykB. C.BennettR. H.CordeauxC.LucasM. V.EilbottJ. A.et al. (2013). Oxytocin enhances brain function in children with autism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A110, 20953–20958. 10.1073/pnas.1312857110

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 107

  GralleM.FerreiraS. T. (2007). Structure and functions of the human amyloid precursor protein: the whole is more than the sum of its parts. Prog. Neurobiol.82, 11–32. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2007.02.001

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 108

  GrossC.BassellG. J. (2012). Excess protein synthesis in FXS patient lymphoblastoid cells can be rescued with a p110beta-selective inhibitor. Mol. Med.18, 336–345. 10.2119/molmed.2011.00363

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 109

  GrossC.BassellG. J. (2014). Neuron-specific regulation of class I PI3K catalytic subunits and their dysfunction in brain disorders. Front. Mol. Neurosci.7:12. 10.3389/fnmol.2014.00012

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 110

  GrossC.Berry-KravisE. M.BassellG. J. (2012). Therapeutic strategies in fragile X syndrome: dysregulated mGluR signaling and beyond. Neuropsychopharmacology37, 178–195. 10.1038/npp.2011.137

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 111

  GrossC.NakamotoM.YaoX.ChanC. B.YimS. Y.YeK.et al. (2010). Excess phosphoinositide 3-kinase subunit synthesis and activity as a novel therapeutic target in fragile X syndrome. J. Neurosci.30, 10624–10638. 10.1523/jneurosci.0402-10.2010

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 112

  GrossC.YaoX.PongD. L.JerominA.BassellG. J. (2011). Fragile X mental retardation protein regulates protein expression and mRNA translation of the potassium channel Kv4.2. J. Neurosci.31, 5693–5698. 10.1523/jneurosci.6661-10.2011

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 113

  GuoW.MurthyA. C.ZhangL.JohnsonE. B.SchallerE. G.AllanA. M.et al. (2012). Inhibition of GSK3beta improves hippocampus-dependent learning and rescues neurogenesis in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome. Hum. Mol. Genet.21, 681–691. 10.1093/hmg/ddr501

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 114

  GuyJ.ChevalH.SelfridgeJ.BirdA. (2011). The role of MeCP2 in the brain. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.27, 631–652. 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154121

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 115

  GuyJ.GanJ.SelfridgeJ.CobbS.BirdA. (2007). Reversal of neurological defects in a mouse model of Rett syndrome. Science315, 1143–1147. 10.1126/science.1138389

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 116

  GuyJ.HendrichB.HolmesM.MartinJ. E.BirdA. (2001). A mouse Mecp2-null mutation causes neurological symptoms that mimic Rett syndrome. Nat. Genet.27, 322–326. 10.1038/85899

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 117

  HagbergB.AicardiJ.DiasK.RamosO. (1983). A progressive syndrome of autism, dementia, ataxia and loss of purposeful hand use in girls: Rett’s syndrome: report of 35 cases. Ann. Neurol.14, 471–479. 10.1002/ana.410140412

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 118

  HagermanR. J.Des-PortesV.GaspariniF.JacquemontS.Gomez-MancillaB. (2014). Translating molecular advances in fragile X syndrome into therapy: a review. J. Clin. Psychiatry75, e294–e307. 10.4088/jcp.13r08714

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 119

  HagermanR. J.HillsJ.ScharfenakerS.LewisH. (1999). Fragile X syndrome and selective mutism. Am. J. Med. Genet.83, 313–317. 10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19990402)83:4<313::aid-ajmg15>3.0.co;2-f

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 120

  HagermanR. J.PolussaJ. (2015). Treatment of the psychiatric problems associated with fragile X syndrome. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry28, 107–112. 10.1097/yco.0000000000000131

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 121

  HallS. S.LightbodyA. A.McCarthyB. E.ParkerK. J.ReissA. L. (2012). Effects of intranasal oxytocin on social anxiety in males with fragile X syndrome. Psychoneuroendocrinology37, 509–518. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.07.020

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 122

  HarringtonR. A.LeeL. C.CrumR. M.ZimmermanA. W.Hertz-PicciottoI. (2013). Serotonin hypothesis of autism: implications for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor use during pregnancy. Autism Res.6, 149–168. 10.1002/aur.1288

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 123

  HayN.SonenbergN. (2004). Upstream and downstream of mTOR. Genes Dev.18, 1926–1945. 10.1101/gad.1212704

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 124

  HayashiM. L.ChoiS. Y.RaoB. S.JungH. Y.LeeH. K.ZhangD.et al. (2004). Altered cortical synaptic morphology and impaired memory consolidation in forebrain-specific dominant-negative PAK transgenic mice. Neuron42, 773–787. 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.05.003

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 125

  HayashiM. L.RaoB. S.SeoJ. S.ChoiH. S.DolanB. M.ChoiS. Y.et al. (2007). Inhibition of p21-activated kinase rescues symptoms of fragile X syndrome in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A104, 11489–11494. 10.1073/pnas.0705003104

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 126

  HaysS. A.HuberK. M.GibsonJ. R. (2011). Altered neocortical rhythmic activity states in Fmr1 KO mice are due to enhanced mGluR5 signaling and involve changes in excitatory circuitry. J. Neurosci.31, 14223–14234. 10.1523/jneurosci.3157-11.2011

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 127

  HeQ.NomuraT.XuJ.ContractorA. (2014). The developmental switch in GABA polarity is delayed in fragile X mice. J. Neurosci.34, 446–450. 10.1523/jneurosci.4447-13.2014

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 128

  HebertB.PietropaoloS.MemeS.LaudierB.LaugerayA.DoisneN.et al. (2014). Rescue of fragile X syndrome phenotypes in Fmr1 KO mice by a BKCa channel opener molecule. Orphanet J. Rare Dis.9:124. 10.1186/s13023-014-0124-6

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 129

  HeifetsB. D.CastilloP. E. (2009). Endocannabinoid signaling and long-term synaptic plasticity. Annu. Rev. Physiol.71, 283–306. 10.1146/annurev.physiol.010908.163149

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 130

  HendersonC.WijetungeL.KinoshitaM. N.ShumwayM.HammondR. S.PostmaF. R.et al. (2012). Reversal of disease-related pathologies in the fragile X mouse model by selective activation of GABAB receptors with arbaclofen. Sci. Transl. Med.4:152ra128. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3004218

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 131

  HesslD.NguyenD. V.GreenC.ChavezA.TassoneF.HagermanR. J.et al. (2009). A solution to limitations of cognitive testing in children with intellectual disabilities: the case of fragile X syndrome. J. Neurodev. Disord.1, 33–45. 10.1007/s11689-008-9001-8

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 132

  HeulensI.D’HulstC.Van DamD.De DeynP. P.KooyR. F. (2012). Pharmacological treatment of fragile X syndrome with GABAergic drugs in a knockout mouse model. Behav. Brain Res.229, 244–249. 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.01.031

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 133

  HoefferC. A.KlannE. (2010). mTOR signaling: at the crossroads of plasticity, memory and disease. Trends Neurosci.33, 67–75. 10.1016/j.tins.2009.11.003

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 134

  HoefferC. A.SanchezE.HagermanR. J.MuY.NguyenD. V.WongH.et al. (2012). Altered mTOR signaling and enhanced CYFIP2 expression levels in subjects with fragile X syndrome. Genes Brain Behav.11, 332–341. 10.1111/j.1601-183x.2012.00768.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 135

  HollanderE.PhillipsA.ChaplinW.ZagurskyK.NovotnyS.WassermanS.et al. (2005). A placebo controlled crossover trial of liquid fluoxetine on repetitive behaviors in childhood and adolescent autism. Neuropsychopharmacology30, 582–589. 10.1038/sj.npp.1300627

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 136

  HollanderE.SooryaL.ChaplinW.AnagnostouE.TaylorB. P.FerrettiC. J.et al. (2012). A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of fluoxetine for repetitive behaviors and global severity in adult autism spectrum disorders. Am. J. Psychiatry169, 292–299. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.10050764

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 137

  HorwoodJ. M.DufourF.LarocheS.DavisS. (2006). Signalling mechanisms mediated by the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt cascade in synaptic plasticity and memory in the rat. Eur. J. Neurosci.23, 3375–3384. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04859.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 138

  HuH.QinY.BochorishviliG.ZhuY.van AelstL.ZhuJ. J. (2008). Ras signaling mechanisms underlying impaired GluR1-dependent plasticity associated with fragile X syndrome. J. Neurosci.28, 7847–7862. 10.1523/jneurosci.1496-08.2008

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 139

  HuguetG.EyE.BourgeronT. (2013). The genetic landscapes of autism spectrum disorders. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet.14, 191–213. 10.1146/annurev-genom-091212-153431

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 140

  HuntleyG. W. (2012). Synaptic circuit remodelling by matrix metalloproteinases in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Neurosci.13, 743–757. 10.1038/nrn3320

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 141

  ImbesiM.UzT.ManevR.SharmaR. P.ManevH. (2008). Minocycline increases phosphorylation and membrane insertion of neuronal GluR1 receptors. Neurosci. Lett.447, 134–137. 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.10.006

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 142

  JacquemontS.Berry-KravisE.HagermanR.von RaisonF.GaspariniF.ApostolG.et al. (2014). The challenges of clinical trials in fragile X syndrome. Psychopharmacology (Berl)231, 1237–1250. 10.1007/s00213-013-3289-0

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 143

  JacquemontS.CurieA.des PortesV.TorrioliM. G.Berry-KravisE.HagermanR. J.et al. (2011). Epigenetic modification of the FMR1 gene in fragile X syndrome is associated with differential response to the mGluR5 antagonist AFQ056. Sci. Transl. Med.3:64ra61. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001708

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 144

  JanuszA.MilekJ.PeryczM.PaciniL.BagniC.KaczmarekL.et al. (2013). The fragile X mental retardation protein regulates matrix metalloproteinase 9 mRNA at synapses. J. Neurosci.33, 18234–18241. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2207-13.2013

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 145

  JayT. M. (2003). Dopamine: a potential substrate for synaptic plasticity and memory mechanisms. Prog. Neurobiol.69, 375–390. 10.1016/s0301-0082(03)00085-6

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 146

  JopeR. S.RohM. S. (2006). Glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK3) in psychiatric diseases and therapeutic interventions. Curr. Drug Targets7, 1421–1434. 10.2174/1389450110607011421

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 147

  JungB. P.JugloffD. G.ZhangG.LoganR.BrownS.EubanksJ. H. (2003). The expression of methyl CpG binding factor MeCP2 correlates with cellular differentiation in the developing rat brain and in cultured cells. J. Neurobiol.55, 86–96. 10.1002/neu.10201

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 148

  JungK. M.SepersM.HenstridgeC. M.LassalleO.NeuhoferD.MartinH.et al. (2012). Uncoupling of the endocannabinoid signalling complex in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome. Nat. Commun.3:1080. 10.1038/ncomms2045

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 149

  KatzD. M. (2014). Brain-derived neurotrophic factor and Rett syndrome. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol.220, 481–495. 10.1007/978-3-642-45106-5_18

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 150

  KatzD. M.Berger-SweeneyJ. E.EubanksJ. H.JusticeM. J.NeulJ. L.Pozzo-MillerL.et al. (2012). Preclinical research in Rett syndrome: setting the foundation for translational success. Dis. Model. Mech.5, 733–745. 10.1242/dmm.011007

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 151

  KelleherR. J.3rdGovindarajanA.JungH. Y.KangH.TonegawaS. (2004). Translational control by MAPK signaling in long-term synaptic plasticity and memory. Cell116, 467–479. 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00115-1

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 152

  KhwajaO. S.HoE.BarnesK. V.O’LearyH. M.PereiraL. M.FinkelsteinY.et al. (2014). Safety, pharmacokinetics and preliminary assessment of efficacy of mecasermin (recombinant human IGF-1) for the treatment of Rett syndrome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A111, 4596–4601. 10.1073/pnas.1311141111

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 153

  KimG. E.KaczmarekL. K. (2014). Emerging role of the KCNT1 Slack channel in intellectual disability. Front. Cell. Neurosci.8:209. 10.3389/fncel.2014.00209

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 154

  KimS. H.MarkhamJ. A.WeilerI. J.GreenoughW. T. (2008). Aberrant early-phase ERK inactivation impedes neuronal function in fragile X syndrome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A105, 4429–4434. 10.1073/pnas.0800257105

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 155

  KingM. K.JopeR. S. (2013). Lithium treatment alleviates impaired cognition in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome. Genes Brain Behav.12, 723–731. 10.1111/gbb.12071

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 156

  KloseR. J.BirdA. P. (2006). Genomic DNA methylation: the mark and its mediators. Trends Biochem. Sci.31, 89–97. 10.1016/j.tibs.2005.12.008

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 157

  KnoblochH. S.GrinevichV. (2014). Evolution of oxytocin pathways in the brain of vertebrates. Front. Behav. Neurosci.8:31. 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00031

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 158

  KolevzonA.MathewsonK. A.HollanderE. (2006). Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in autism: a review of efficacy and tolerability. J. Clin. Psychiatry67, 407–414. 10.4088/jcp.v67n0311

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 159

  KreisP.BarnierJ. V. (2009). PAK signalling in neuronal physiology. Cell. Signal.21, 384–393. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2008.11.001

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 160

  KronM.HowellC. J.AdamsI. T.RansbottomM.ChristianD.OgierM.et al. (2012). Brain activity mapping in Mecp2 mutant mice reveals functional deficits in forebrain circuits, including key nodes in the default mode network, that are reversed with ketamine treatment. J. Neurosci.32, 13860–13872. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2159-12.2012

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 161

  KronM.LangM.AdamsI. T.SceniakM.LongoF.KatzD. M. (2014). A BDNF loop-domain mimetic acutely reverses spontaneous apneas and respiratory abnormalities during behavioral arousal in a mouse model of Rett syndrome. Dis. Model. Mech.7, 1047–1055. 10.1242/dmm.016030

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 162

  KruegerD. D.OsterweilE. K.ChenS. P.TyeL. D.BearM. F. (2011). Cognitive dysfunction and prefrontal synaptic abnormalities in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A108, 2587–2592. 10.1073/pnas.1013855108

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 163

  KrummN.O’RoakB. J.ShendureJ.EichlerE. E. (2014). A de novo convergence of autism genetics and molecular neuroscience. Trends Neurosci.37, 95–105. 10.1016/j.tins.2013.11.005

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 164

  KumariR.CastilloC.FrancesconiA. (2013). Agonist-dependent signaling by group I metabotropic glutamate receptors is regulated by association with lipid domains. J. Biol. Chem.288, 32004–32019. 10.1074/jbc.M113.475863

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 165

  LaiM. C.LombardoM. V.Baron-CohenS. (2014). Autism. Lancet383, 896–910. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61539-1

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 166

  LandisS. C.AmaraS. G.AsadullahK.AustinC. P.BlumensteinR.BradleyE. W.et al. (2012). A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research. Nature490, 187–191. 10.1038/nature11556

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 167

  LaSalleJ. M.GoldstineJ.BalmerD.GrecoC. M. (2001). Quantitative localization of heterogeneous methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MeCP2) expression phenotypes in normal and Rett syndrome brain by laser scanning cytometry. Hum. Mol. Genet.10, 1729–1740. 10.1093/hmg/10.17.1729

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 168

  LaurvickC. L.de KlerkN.BowerC.ChristodoulouJ.RavineD.EllawayC.et al. (2006). Rett syndrome in Australia: a review of the epidemiology. J. Pediatr.148, 347–352. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.10.037

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 169

  LauterbornJ. C.TruongG. S.BaudryM.BiX.LynchG.GallC. M. (2003). Chronic elevation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor by ampakines. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.307, 297–305. 10.1124/jpet.103.053694

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 170

  LeeH. Y.GeW. P.HuangW.HeY.WangG. X.Rowson-BaldwinA.et al. (2011). Bidirectional regulation of dendritic voltage-gated potassium channels by the fragile X mental retardation protein. Neuron72, 630–642. 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.033

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 171

  LeeH. Y.JanL. Y. (2012). Fragile X syndrome: mechanistic insights and therapeutic avenues regarding the role of potassium channels. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.22, 887–894. 10.1016/j.conb.2012.03.010

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 172

  LeighM. J.NguyenD. V.MuY.WinarniT. I.SchneiderA.ChechiT.et al. (2013). A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of minocycline in children and adolescents with fragile x syndrome. J. Dev. Behav. Pediatr.34, 147–155. 10.1097/DBP.0b013e318287cd17

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 173

  LekmanA.Witt-EngerstromI.GottfriesJ.HagbergB. A.PercyA. K.SvennerholmL. (1989). Rett syndrome: biogenic amines and metabolites in postmortem brain. Pediatr. Neurol.5, 357–362. 10.1016/0887-8994(89)90049-0

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 174

  LeschK. P.WaiderJ. (2012). Serotonin in the modulation of neural plasticity and networks: implications for neurodevelopmental disorders. Neuron76, 175–191. 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.09.013

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 175

  LevengaJ.HayashiS.de VrijF. M.KoekkoekS. K.van der LindeH. C.NieuwenhuizenI.et al. (2011). AFQ056, a new mGluR5 antagonist for treatment of fragile X syndrome. Neurobiol. Dis.42, 311–317. 10.1016/j.nbd.2011.01.022

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 176

  LiW.Pozzo-MillerL. (2014). BDNF deregulation in Rett syndrome. Neuropharmacology76(Pt. C), 737–746. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.03.024

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 177

  LimC. S.HoangE. T.ViarK. E.StornettaR. L.ScottM. M.ZhuJ. J. (2014). Pharmacological rescue of Ras signaling, GluA1-dependent synaptic plasticity and learning deficits in a fragile X model. Genes Dev.28, 273–289. 10.1101/gad.232470.113

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 178

  LiptonJ.SahinM. (2013). Fragile X syndrome therapeutics: translation, meet translational medicine. Neuron77, 212–213. 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.01.009

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 179

  MaccarroneM.RossiS.BariM.De ChiaraV.RapinoC.MusellaA.et al. (2010). Abnormal mGlu 5 receptor/endocannabinoid coupling in mice lacking FMRP and BC1 RNA. Neuropsychopharmacology35, 1500–1509. 10.1038/npp.2010.19

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 180

  Maliszewska-CynaE.BawaD.EubanksJ. H. (2010). Diminished prevalence but preserved synaptic distribution of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunits in the methyl CpG binding protein 2(MeCP2)-null mouse brain. Neuroscience168, 624–632. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.03.065

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 181

  MalterJ. S.RayB. C.WestmarkP. R.WestmarkC. J. (2010). Fragile X syndrome and Alzheimer’s disease: another story about APP and beta-amyloid. Curr. Alzheimer Res.7, 200–206. 10.2174/156720510791050957

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 182

  MarchettoM. C.CarromeuC.AcabA.YuD.YeoG. W.MuY.et al. (2010). A model for neural development and treatment of Rett syndrome using human induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell143, 527–539. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.10.016

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 183

  MartinowichK.HattoriD.WuH.FouseS.HeF.HuY.et al. (2003). DNA methylation-related chromatin remodeling in activity-dependent BDNF gene regulation. Science302, 890–893. 10.1126/science.1090842

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 184

  MassaS. M.YangT.XieY.ShiJ.BilgenM.JoyceJ. N.et al. (2010). Small molecule BDNF mimetics activate TrkB signaling and prevent neuronal degeneration in rodents. J. Clin. Invest.120, 1774–1785. 10.1172/JCI41356

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 185

  MatthysA.HaegemanG.Van CraenenbroeckK.VanhoenackerP. (2011). Role of the 5-HT7 receptor in the central nervous system: from current status to future perspectives. Mol. Neurobiol.43, 228–253. 10.1007/s12035-011-8175-3

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 186

  McCauleyM. D.WangT.MikeE.HerreraJ.BeaversD. L.HuangT. W.et al. (2011). Pathogenesis of lethal cardiac arrhythmias in Mecp2 mutant mice: implication for therapy in Rett syndrome. Sci. Transl. Med.3:113ra125. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002982

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 187

  McCoyP. A.McMahonL. L. (2007). Muscarinic receptor dependent long-term depression in rat visual cortex is PKC independent but requires ERK1/2 activation and protein synthesis. J. Neurophysiol.98, 1862–1870. 10.1152/jn.00510.2007

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 188

  McEwenB. S.ChattarjiS.DiamondD. M.JayT. M.ReaganL. P.SvenningssonP.et al. (2010). The neurobiological properties of tianeptine (Stablon): from monoamine hypothesis to glutamatergic modulation. Mol. Psychiatry15, 237–249. 10.1038/mp.2009.80

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 189

  MedrihanL.TantalakiE.AramuniG.SargsyanV.DudanovaI.MisslerM.et al. (2008). Early defects of GABAergic synapses in the brain stem of a MeCP2 mouse model of Rett syndrome. J. Neurophysiol.99, 112–121. 10.1152/jn.00826.2007

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 190

  MeffordH. C.BatshawM. L.HoffmanE. P. (2012). Genomics, intellectual disability and autism. N. Engl. J. Med.366, 733–743. 10.1056/NEJMra1114194

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 191

  Meyer-LindenbergA.DomesG.KirschP.HeinrichsM. (2011). Oxytocin and vasopressin in the human brain: social neuropeptides for translational medicine. Nat. Rev. Neurosci.12, 524–538. 10.1038/nrn3044

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 192

  MichalonA.BrunsA.RisterucciC.HonerM.BallardT. M.OzmenL.et al. (2014). Chronic metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 inhibition corrects local alterations of brain activity and improves cognitive performance in fragile X mice. Biol. Psychiatry75, 189–197. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.05.038

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 193

  MichalonA.SidorovM.BallardT. M.OzmenL.SpoorenW.WettsteinJ. G.et al. (2012). Chronic pharmacological mGlu5 inhibition corrects fragile X in adult mice. Neuron74, 49–56. 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.009

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 194

  MinW. W.YuskaitisC. J.YanQ.SikorskiC.ChenS.JopeR. S.et al. (2009). Elevated glycogen synthase kinase-3 activity in fragile X mice: key metabolic regulator with evidence for treatment potential. Neuropharmacology56, 463–472. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.09.017

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 195

  MinesM. A.JopeR. S. (2011). Glycogen synthase kinase-3: a promising therapeutic target for fragile x syndrome. Front. Mol. Neurosci.4:35. 10.3389/fnmol.2011.00035

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 196

  MinesM. A.YuskaitisC. J.KingM. K.BeurelE.JopeR. S. (2010). GSK3 influences social preference and anxiety-related behaviors during social interaction in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome and autism. PLoS One5:e9706. 10.1371/journal.pone.0009706

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 197

  MisonouH. (2010). Homeostatic regulation of neuronal excitability by K(+) channels in normal and diseased brains. Neuroscientist16, 51–64. 10.1177/1073858409341085

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 198

  MorettiP.ZoghbiH. Y. (2006). MeCP2 dysfunction in Rett syndrome and related disorders. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.16, 276–281. 10.1016/j.gde.2006.04.009

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 199

  MukherjeeS.Manahan-VaughanD. (2013). Role of metabotropic glutamate receptors in persistent forms of hippocampal plasticity and learning. Neuropharmacology66, 65–81. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.06.005

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 200

  MurataY.Constantine-PatonM. (2013). Postsynaptic density scaffold SAP102 regulates cortical synapse development through EphB and PAK signaling pathway. J. Neurosci.33, 5040–5052. 10.1523/jneurosci.2896-12.2013

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 201

  MurdochJ. D.StateM. W. (2013). Recent developments in the genetics of autism spectrum disorders. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.23, 310–315. 10.1016/j.gde.2013.02.003

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 202

  NakamotoM.NalavadiV.EpsteinM. P.NarayananU.BassellG. J.WarrenS. T. (2007). Fragile X mental retardation protein deficiency leads to excessive mGluR5-dependent internalization of AMPA receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A104, 15537–15542. 10.1073/pnas.0707484104

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 203

  NalivaevaN. N.TurnerA. J. (2013). The amyloid precursor protein: a biochemical enigma in brain development, function and disease. FEBS Lett.587, 2046–2054. 10.1016/j.febslet.2013.05.010

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 204

  NanX.NgH. H.JohnsonC. A.LahertyC. D.TurnerB. M.EisenmanR. N.et al. (1998). Transcriptional repression by the methyl-CpG-binding protein MeCP2 involves a histone deacetylase complex. Nature393, 386–389. 10.3410/f.718020287.793478774

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 205

  NarayananU.NalavadiV.NakamotoM.ThomasG.CemanS.BassellG. J.et al. (2008). S6K1 phosphorylates and regulates fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) with the neuronal protein synthesis-dependent mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling cascade. J. Biol. Chem.283, 18478–18482. 10.1074/jbc.c800055200

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 206

  NeulJ. L.KaufmannW. E.GlazeD. G.ChristodoulouJ.ClarkeA. J.Bahi-BuissonN.et al. (2010). Rett syndrome: revised diagnostic criteria and nomenclature. Ann. Neurol.68, 944–950. 10.1002/ana.22124

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 207

  NeulJ. L.LaneJ. B.LeeH. S.GeertsS.BarrishJ. O.AnneseF.et al. (2014). Developmental delay in Rett syndrome: data from the natural history study. J. Neurodev. Disord.6:20. 10.1186/1866-1955-6-20

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 208

  NeumannI. D. (2008). Brain oxytocin: a key regulator of emotional and social behaviours in both females and males. J. Neuroendocrinol.20, 858–865. 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2008.01726.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 209

  NeumannI. D.LandgrafR. (2012). Balance of brain oxytocin and vasopressin: implications for anxiety, depression and social behaviors. Trends Neurosci.35, 649–659. 10.1016/j.tins.2012.08.004

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 210

  NiederhoferH. (2007). Glutamate antagonists seem to be slightly effective in psychopharmacologic treatment of autism. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol.27, 317–318. 10.1097/01.jcp.0000270082.30500.69

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 211

  OgierM.WangH.HongE.WangQ.GreenbergM. E.KatzD. M. (2007). Brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression and respiratory function improve after ampakine treatment in a mouse model of Rett syndrome. J. Neurosci.27, 10912–10917. 10.1523/jneurosci.1869-07.2007

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 212

  Olmos-SerranoJ. L.CorbinJ. G.BurnsM. P. (2011). The GABA(A) receptor agonist THIP ameliorates specific behavioral deficits in the mouse model of fragile X syndrome. Dev. Neurosci.33, 395–403. 10.1159/000332884

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 213

  Olmos-SerranoJ. L.PaluszkiewiczS. M.MartinB. S.KaufmannW. E.CorbinJ. G.HuntsmanM. M. (2010). Defective GABAergic neurotransmission and pharmacological rescue of neuronal hyperexcitability in the amygdala in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome. J. Neurosci.30, 9929–9938. 10.1523/jneurosci.1714-10.2010

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 214

  O’NeillM. J.BleakmanD.ZimmermanD. M.NisenbaumE. S. (2004). AMPA receptor potentiators for the treatment of CNS disorders. Curr. Drug Targets CNS Neurol. Disord.3, 181–194. 10.2174/1568007043337508

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 215

  O’NeillM. J.WitkinJ. M. (2007). AMPA receptor potentiators: application for depression and Parkinson’s disease. Curr. Drug Targets8, 603–620. 10.2174/138945007780618517

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 216

  OsterweilE. K.ChuangS. C.ChubykinA. A.SidorovM.BianchiR.WongR. K.et al. (2013). Lovastatin corrects excess protein synthesis and prevents epileptogenesis in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome. Neuron77, 243–250. 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.01.034

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 217

  OsterweilE. K.KruegerD. D.ReinholdK.BearM. F. (2010). Hypersensitivity to mGluR5 and ERK1/2 leads to excessive protein synthesis in the hippocampus of a mouse model of fragile X syndrome. J. Neurosci.30, 15616–15627. 10.1523/jneurosci.3888-10.2010

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 218

  OudinM. J.HobbsC.DohertyP. (2011). DAGL-dependent endocannabinoid signalling: roles in axonal pathfinding, synaptic plasticity and adult neurogenesis. Eur. J. Neurosci.34, 1634–1646. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07831.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 219

  PaceyL. K.DoeringL. C. (2007). Developmental expression of FMRP in the astrocyte lineage: implications for fragile X syndrome. Glia55, 1601–1609. 10.1002/glia.20573

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 220

  PaceyL. K.HeximerS. P.HampsonD. R. (2009). Increased GABA(B) receptor-mediated signaling reduces the susceptibility of fragile X knockout mice to audiogenic seizures. Mol. Pharmacol.76, 18–24. 10.1124/mol.109.056127

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 221

  PaceyL. K.TharmalingamS.HampsonD. R. (2011). Subchronic administration and combination metabotropic glutamate and GABAB receptor drug therapy in fragile X syndrome. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.338, 897–905. 10.1124/jpet.111.183327

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 222

  PaluszkiewiczS. M.MartinB. S.HuntsmanM. M. (2011). Fragile X syndrome: the GABAergic system and circuit dysfunction. Dev. Neurosci.33, 349–364. 10.1159/000329420

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 223

  ParibelloC.TaoL.FolinoA.Berry-KravisE.TranfagliaM.EthellI. M.et al. (2010). Open-label add-on treatment trial of minocycline in fragile X syndrome. BMC Neurol.10:91. 10.1186/1471-2377-10-91

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 224

  PaulK.VenkitaramaniD. V.CoxC. L. (2013). Dampened dopamine-mediated neuromodulation in prefrontal cortex of fragile X mice. J. Physiol.591, 1133–1143. 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.241067

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 225

  PenagarikanoO.MulleJ. G.WarrenS. T. (2007). The pathophysiology of fragile x syndrome. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet.8, 109–129. 10.1146/annurev.genom.8.080706.092249

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 226

  PercyA. K.LaneJ. B.ChildersJ.SkinnerS.AnneseF.BarrishJ.et al. (2007). Rett syndrome: North American database. J. Child Neurol.22, 1338–1341. 10.1177/0883073807308715

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 227

  PercyA. K.NeulJ. L.GlazeD. G.MotilK. J.SkinnerS. A.KhwajaO.et al. (2010). Rett syndrome diagnostic criteria: lessons from the natural history study. Ann. Neurol.68, 951–955. 10.1002/ana.22154

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 228

  PicciottoM. R.HigleyM. J.MineurY. S. (2012). Acetylcholine as a neuromodulator: cholinergic signaling shapes nervous system function and behavior. Neuron76, 116–129. 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.036

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 229

  PilpelY.KollekerA.BerberichS.GingerM.FrickA.MientjesE.et al. (2009). Synaptic ionotropic glutamate receptors and plasticity are developmentally altered in the CA1 field of Fmr1 knockout mice. J. Physiol.587, 787–804. 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.160929

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 230

  PitcherM. R.WardC. S.ArvideE. M.ChapleauC. A.Pozzo-MillerL.HoeflichA.et al. (2013). Insulinotropic treatments exacerbate metabolic syndrome in mice lacking MeCP2 function. Hum. Mol. Genet.22, 2626–2633. 10.1093/hmg/ddt111

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 231

  PopA. S.LevengaJ.de EschC. E.BuijsenR. A.NieuwenhuizenI. M.LiT.et al. (2014). Rescue of dendritic spine phenotype in Fmr1 KO mice with the mGluR5 antagonist AFQ056/Mavoglurant. Psychopharmacology (Berl)231, 1227–1235. 10.1007/s00213-012-2947-y

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 232

  PopescuA. C.SidorovaE.ZhangG.EubanksJ. H. (2010). Aminoglycoside-mediated partial suppression of MECP2 nonsense mutations responsible for Rett syndrome in vitro. J. Neurosci. Res.88, 2316–2324. 10.1002/jnr.22409

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 233

  PrasadH. C.SteinerJ. A.SutcliffeJ. S.BlakelyR. D. (2009). Enhanced activity of human serotonin transporter variants associated with autism. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.364, 163–173. 10.1098/rstb.2008.0143

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 234

  PretiA.MelisM.SiddiS.VellanteM.DonedduG.FaddaR. (2014). Oxytocin and autism: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J. Child Adolesc. Psychopharmacol.24, 54–68. 10.1089/cap.2013.0040

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 235

  RandallA. D.WittonJ.BoothC.Hynes-AllenA.BrownJ. T. (2010). The functional neurophysiology of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) processing pathway. Neuropharmacology59, 243–267. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2010.02.011

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 236

  RaymondC. R.ThompsonV. L.TateW. P.AbrahamW. C. (2000). Metabotropic glutamate receptors trigger homosynaptic protein synthesis to prolong long-term potentiation. J. Neurosci.20, 969–976.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 237

  RobertsJ. E.SymonsF. J.JohnsonA. M.HattonD. D.BocciaM. L. (2005). Blink rate in boys with fragile X syndrome: preliminary evidence for altered dopamine function. J. Intellect. Disabil. Res.49, 647–656. 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00713.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 238

  RogersT. D.DicksonP. E.McKimmE.HeckD. H.GoldowitzD.BlahaC. D.et al. (2013). Reorganization of circuits underlying cerebellar modulation of prefrontal cortical dopamine in mouse models of autism spectrum disorder. Cerebellum12, 547–556. 10.1007/s12311-013-0462-2

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 239

  RonemusM.IossifovI.LevyD.WiglerM. (2014). The role of de novo mutations in the genetics of autism spectrum disorders. Nat. Rev. Genet.15, 133–141. 10.1038/nrg3585

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 240

  RonesiJ. A.HuberK. M. (2008a). Metabotropic glutamate receptors and fragile x mental retardation protein: partners in translational regulation at the synapse. Sci. Signal.1:pe6. 10.1126/stke.15pe6

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 241

  RonesiJ. A.HuberK. M. (2008b). Homer interactions are necessary for metabotropic glutamate receptor-induced long-term depression and translational activation. J. Neurosci.28, 543–547. 10.1523/jneurosci.5019-07.2008

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 242

  RotschaferS. E.TrujilloM. S.DansieL. E.EthellI. M.RazakK. A. (2012). Minocycline treatment reverses ultrasonic vocalization production deficit in a mouse model of Fragile X syndrome. Brain Res.1439, 7–14. 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.12.041

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 243

  RouxJ. C.DuraE.MonclaA.ManciniJ.VillardL. (2007). Treatment with desipramine improves breathing and survival in a mouse model for Rett syndrome. Eur. J. Neurosci.25, 1915–1922. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05466.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 244

  RouxJ. C.DuraE.VillardL. (2008). Tyrosine hydroxylase deficit in the chemoafferent and the sympathoadrenergic pathways of the Mecp2 deficient mouse. Neurosci. Lett.447, 82–86. 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.09.045

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 245

  SamacoR. C.NeulJ. L. (2011). Complexities of Rett syndrome and MeCP2. J. Neurosci.31, 7951–7959. 10.1523/jneurosci.0169-11.2011

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 246

  SantoroM. R.BrayS. M.WarrenS. T. (2012). Molecular mechanisms of fragile X syndrome: a twenty-year perspective. Annu. Rev. Pathol.7, 219–245. 10.1146/annurev-pathol-011811-132457

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 247

  SchanenC.HouwinkE. J.DorraniN.LaneJ.EverettR.FengA.et al. (2004). Phenotypic manifestations of MECP2 mutations in classical and atypical Rett syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet. A126A, 129–140. 10.1002/ajmg.a.20571

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 248

  ScheeleD.KendrickK. M.KhouriC.KretzerE.SchläpferT. E.Stoffel-WagnerB.et al. (2014). An oxytocin-induced facilitation of neural and emotional responses to social touch correlates inversely with autism traits. Neuropsychopharmacology39, 2078–2085. 10.1038/npp.2014.78

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 249

  SchmidD. A.YangT.OgierM.AdamsI.MirakhurY.WangQ.et al. (2012). A TrkB small molecule partial agonist rescues TrkB phosphorylation deficits and improves respiratory function in a mouse model of Rett syndrome. J. Neurosci.32, 1803–1810. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0865-11.2012

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 250

  SchmitT. L.DowellJ. A.MaesM. E.WilhelmM. (2013). c-Jun N-terminal kinase regulates mGluR-dependent expression of post-synaptic FMRP target proteins. J. Neurochem.127, 772–781. 10.1111/jnc.12453

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 251

  SeamansJ. K.YangC. R. (2004). The principal features and mechanisms of dopamine modulation in the prefrontal cortex. Prog. Neurobiol.74, 1–58. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2004.05.006

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 252

  SegalR. A.GreenbergM. E. (1996). Intracellular signaling pathways activated by neurotrophic factors. Annu. Rev. Neurosci.19, 463–489. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.19.1.463

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 253

  ShahbazianM. D.AntalffyB.ArmstrongD. L.ZoghbiH. Y. (2002). Insight into Rett syndrome: MeCP2 levels display tissue- and cell-specific differences and correlate with neuronal maturation. Hum. Mol. Genet.11, 115–124. 10.1093/hmg/11.2.115

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 254

  SharmaA.HoefferC. A.TakayasuY.MiyawakiT.McBrideS. M.KlannE.et al. (2010). Dysregulation of mTOR signaling in fragile X syndrome. J. Neurosci.30, 694–702. 10.1523/jneurosci.3696-09.2010

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 255

  SidhuH.DansieL. E.HickmottP. W.EthellD. W.EthellI. M. (2014). Genetic removal of matrix metalloproteinase 9 rescues the symptoms of fragile x syndrome in a mouse model. J. Neurosci.34, 9867–9879. 10.1523/jneurosci.1162-14.2014

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 256

  SidorovM. S.AuerbachB. D.BearM. F. (2013). Fragile X mental retardation protein and synaptic plasticity. Mol. Brain6:15. 10.1186/1756-6606-6-15

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 257

  SigelE.SteinmannM. E. (2012). Structure, function and modulation of GABA(A) receptors. J. Biol. Chem.287, 40224–40231. 10.1074/jbc.R112.386664

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 258

  SillerS. S.BroadieK. (2012). Matrix metalloproteinases and minocycline: therapeutic avenues for fragile X syndrome. Neural Plast.2012:124548. 10.1155/2012/124548

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 259

  StraikerA.MinK. T.MackieK. (2013). Fmr1 deletion enhances and ultimately desensitizes CB(1) signaling in autaptic hippocampal neurons. Neurobiol. Dis.56, 1–5. 10.1016/j.nbd.2013.04.002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 260

  StrumbosJ. G.BrownM. R.KronengoldJ.PolleyD. B.KaczmarekL. K. (2010). Fragile X mental retardation protein is required for rapid experience-dependent regulation of the potassium channel Kv3.1b. J. Neurosci.30, 10263–10271. 10.1523/jneurosci.1125-10.2010

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 261

  SugdenP. H.FullerS. J.WeissS. C.ClerkA. (2008). Glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) in the heart: a point of integration in hypertrophic signalling and a therapeutic target? A critical analysis. Br. J. Pharmacol.153(Suppl 1), S137–S153. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707659

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 262

  SurmeierD. J.PlotkinJ.ShenW. (2009). Dopamine and synaptic plasticity in dorsal striatal circuits controlling action selection. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.19, 621–628. 10.1016/j.conb.2009.10.003

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 263

  SuvrathanA.HoefferC. A.WongH.KlannE.ChattarjiS. (2010). Characterization and reversal of synaptic defects in the amygdala in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A107, 11591–11596. 10.1073/pnas.1002262107

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 264

  TavoulariS.ForrestL. R.RudnickG. (2009). Fluoxetine (Prozac) binding to serotonin transporter is modulated by chloride and conformational changes. J. Neurosci.29, 9635–9643. 10.1523/jneurosci.0440-09.2009

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 265

  ThomasA. M.BuiN.GrahamD.PerkinsJ. R.Yuva-PaylorL. A.PaylorR. (2011). Genetic reduction of group 1 metabotropic glutamate receptors alters select behaviors in a mouse model for fragile X syndrome. Behav. Brain Res.223, 310–321. 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.04.049

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 266

  ThomasA. M.BuiN.PerkinsJ. R.Yuva-PaylorL. A.PaylorR. (2012). Group I metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonists alter select behaviors in a mouse model for fragile X syndrome. Psychopharmacology (Berl)219, 47–58. 10.1007/s00213-011-2375-4

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 267

  ThomasG. M.HuganirR. L. (2004). MAPK cascade signalling and synaptic plasticity. Nat. Rev. Neurosci.5, 173–183. 10.1038/nrn1346

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 268

  TrappeR.LacconeF.CobilanschiJ.MeinsM.HuppkeP.HanefeldF.et al. (2001). MECP2 mutations in sporadic cases of Rett syndrome are almost exclusively of paternal origin. Am. J. Hum. Genet.68, 1093–1101. 10.1086/320109

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 269

  TropeaD.GiacomettiE.WilsonN. R.BeardC.McCurryC.FuD. D.et al. (2009). Partial reversal of Rett syndrome-like symptoms in MeCP2 mutant mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A106, 2029–2034. 10.1073/pnas.0812394106

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 270

  TyzioR.NardouR.FerrariD. C.TsintsadzeT.ShahrokhiA.EftekhariS.et al. (2014). Oxytocin-mediated GABA inhibition during delivery attenuates autism pathogenesis in rodent offspring. Science343, 675–679. 10.1126/science.1247190

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 271

  UpretiC.ZhangX. L.AlfordS.StantonP. K. (2013). Role of presynaptic metabotropic glutamate receptors in the induction of long-term synaptic plasticity of vesicular release. Neuropharmacology66, 31–39. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.05.004

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 272

  UutelaM.LindholmJ.RantamäkiT.UmemoriJ.HunterK.VõikarV.et al. (2014). Distinctive behavioral and cellular responses to fluoxetine in the mouse model for fragile X syndrome. Front. Cell. Neurosci.8:150. 10.3389/fncel.2014.00150

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 273

  Veenstra-VanderWeeleJ.MullerC. L.IwamotoH.SauerJ. E.OwensW. A.ShahC. R.et al. (2012). Autism gene variant causes hyperserotonemia, serotonin receptor hypersensitivity, social impairment and repetitive behavior. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A109, 5469–5474. 10.1073/pnas.1112345109

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 274

  VeeraragavanS.BuiN.PerkinsJ. R.Yuva-PaylorL. A.CarpenterR. L.PaylorR. (2011b). Modulation of behavioral phenotypes by a muscarinic M1 antagonist in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome. Psychopharmacology (Berl)217, 143–151. 10.1007/s00213-011-2276-6

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 275

  VeeraragavanS.BuiN.PerkinsJ. R.Yuva-PaylorL. A.PaylorR. (2011a). The modulation of fragile X behaviors by the muscarinic M4 antagonist, tropicamide. Behav. Neurosci.125, 783–790. 10.1037/a0025202

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 276

  VeeraragavanS.GrahamD.BuiN.Yuva-PaylorL. A.WessJ.PaylorR. (2012). Genetic reduction of muscarinic M4 receptor modulates analgesic response and acoustic startle response in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome (FXS). Behav. Brain Res.228, 1–8. 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.11.018

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 277

  Vinueza VelozM. F.BuijsenR. A.WillemsenR.CupidoA.BosmanL. W.KoekkoekS. K.et al. (2012). The effect of an mGluR5 inhibitor on procedural memory and avoidance discrimination impairments in Fmr1 KO mice. Genes Brain Behav.11, 325–331. 10.1111/j.1601-183x.2011.00763.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 278

  VolkL. J.PfeifferB. E.GibsonJ. R.HuberK. M. (2007). Multiple Gq-coupled receptors converge on a common protein synthesis-dependent long-term depression that is affected in fragile X syndrome mental retardation. J. Neurosci.27, 11624–11634. 10.1523/jneurosci.2266-07.2007

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 279

  VolpicelliL. A.LeveyA. I. (2004). Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes in cerebral cortex and hippocampus. Prog. Brain Res.145, 59–66. 10.1016/s0079-6123(03)45003-6

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 280

  WangH. (2014). Lipid rafts: a signaling platform linking cholesterol metabolism to synaptic deficits in autism spectrum disorders. Front. Behav. Neurosci.8:104. 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00104

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 281

  WangL. W.Berry-KravisE.HagermanR. J. (2010b). Fragile X: leading the way for targeted treatments in autism. Neurotherapeutics7, 264–274. 10.1016/j.nurt.2010.05.005

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 282

  WangT.BrayS. M.WarrenS. T. (2012a). New perspectives on the biology of fragile X syndrome. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.22, 256–263. 10.1016/j.gde.2012.02.002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 283

  WangH.DoeringL. C. (2012). Induced pluripotent stem cells to model and treat neurogenetic disorders. Neural Plast.2012:346053. 10.1155/2012/346053

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 284

  WangH.DoeringL. C. (2013). Reversing autism by targeting downstream mTOR signaling. Front. Cell. Neurosci.7:28. 10.3389/fncel.2013.00028

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 285

  WangH.KimS. S.ZhuoM. (2010a). Roles of fragile X mental retardation protein in dopaminergic stimulation-induced synapse-associated protein synthesis and subsequent alpha-amino-3-hydroxyl-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-4-propionate (AMPA) receptor internalization. J. Biol. Chem.285, 21888–21901. 10.1074/jbc.M110.116293

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 286

  WangH.KuL.OsterhoutD. J.LiW.AhmadianA.LiangZ.et al. (2004). Developmentally-programmed FMRP expression in oligodendrocytes: a potential role of FMRP in regulating translation in oligodendroglia progenitors. Hum. Mol. Genet.13, 79–89. 10.1093/hmg/ddh009

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 287

  WangG. X.SmithS. J.MourrainP. (2014). Fmr1 KO and fenobam treatment differentially impact distinct synapse populations of mouse neocortex. Neuron84, 1273–1286. 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.11.016

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 288

  WangX.SnapeM.KlannE.StoneJ. G.SinghA.PetersenR. B.et al. (2012b). Activation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway contributes to the behavioral deficit of fragile x-syndrome. J. Neurochem.121, 672–679. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2012.07722.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 289

  WangH.WuL. J.KimS. S.LeeF. J.GongB.ToyodaH.et al. (2008b). FMRP acts as a key messenger for dopamine modulation in the forebrain. Neuron59, 634–647. 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.06.027

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 290

  WangH.WuL. J.ZhangF.ZhuoM. (2008a). Roles of calcium-stimulated adenylyl cyclase and calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IV in the regulation of FMRP by group I metabotropic glutamate receptors. J. Neurosci.28, 4385–4397. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0646-08.2008

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 291

  WangH.ZhuoM. (2012). Group I metabotropic glutamate receptor-mediated gene transcription and implications for synaptic plasticity and diseases. Front. Pharmacol.3:189. 10.3389/fphar.2012.00189

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 292

  WatanabeT.AbeO.KuwabaraH.YahataN.TakanoY.IwashiroN.et al. (2014). Mitigation of sociocommunicational deficits of autism through oxytocin-induced recovery of medial prefrontal activity: a randomized trial. JAMA Psychiatry71, 166–175. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.3181

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 293

  WeiH.DobkinC.SheikhA. M.MalikM.BrownW. T.LiX. (2012). The therapeutic effect of memantine through the stimulation of synapse formation and dendritic spine maturation in autism and fragile X syndrome. PLoS One7:e36981. 10.1371/journal.pone.0036981

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 294

  WeilerI. J.GreenoughW. T. (1993). Metabotropic glutamate receptors trigger postsynaptic protein synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A90, 7168–7171. 10.1073/pnas.90.15.7168

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 295

  WeinshenkerD.WarrenS. T. (2008). Neuroscience: fragile dopamine. Nature455, 607–608. 10.1038/455607a

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 296

  WengN.WeilerI. J.SumisA.Berry-KravisE.GreenoughW. T. (2008). Early-phase ERK activation as a biomarker for metabolic status in fragile X syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet.147B, 1253–1257. 10.1002/ajmg.b.30765

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 297

  WernickeJ. F. (2004). Safety and side effect profile of fluoxetine. Expert Opin. Drug Saf.3, 495–504. 10.1517/14740338.3.5.495

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 298

  WestmarkC. J. (2013). What’s hAPPening at synapses? The role of amyloid beta-protein precursor and β-amyloid in neurological disorders. Mol. Psychiatry18, 425–434. 10.1038/mp.2012.122

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 299

  WestmarkC. J.Berry-KravisE. M.IkonomidouC.YinJ. C.PuglielliL. (2013). Developing BACE-1 inhibitors for FXS. Front. Cell. Neurosci.7:77. 10.3389/fncel.2013.00077

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 300

  WestmarkC. J.MalterJ. S. (2007). FMRP mediates mGluR5-dependent translation of amyloid precursor protein. PLoS Biol.5:e52. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050052

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 301

  WestmarkC. J.WestmarkP. R.MalterJ. S. (2010). MPEP reduces seizure severity in Fmr-1 KO mice over expressing human Abeta. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol.3, 56–68.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 302

  WestmarkC. J.WestmarkP. R.O’RiordanK. J.RayB. C.HerveyC. M.SalamatM. S.et al. (2011). Reversal of fragile X phenotypes by manipulation of AβPP/Aβ levels in Fmr1KO mice. PLoS One6:e26549. 10.1371/journal.pone.0026549

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 303

  WiegertJ. S.BadingH. (2011). Activity-dependent calcium signaling and ERK-MAP kinases in neurons: a link to structural plasticity of the nucleus and gene transcription regulation. Cell Calcium49, 296–305. 10.1016/j.ceca.2010.11.009

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 304

  WijetungeL. S.ChattarjiS.WyllieD. J.KindP. C. (2013). Fragile X syndrome: from targets to treatments. Neuropharmacology68, 83–96. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.11.028

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 305

  WongD. T.PerryK. W.BymasterF. P. (2005). Case history: the discovery of fluoxetine hydrochloride (Prozac). Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.4, 764–774. 10.1038/nrd1821

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 306

  WrightJ. W.HardingJ. W. (2009). Contributions of matrix metalloproteinases to neural plasticity, habituation, associative learning and drug addiction. Neural Plast.2009:579382. 10.1155/2009/579382

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 307

  YanQ. J.RammalM.TranfagliaM.BauchwitzR. P. (2005). Suppression of two major fragile X syndrome mouse model phenotypes by the mGluR5 antagonist MPEP. Neuropharmacology49, 1053–1066. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2005.06.004

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 308

  YunS. H.TrommerB. L. (2011). Fragile X mice: reduced long-term potentiation and N-Methyl-D-Aspartate receptor-mediated neurotransmission in dentate gyrus. J. Neurosci. Res.89, 176–182. 10.1002/jnr.22546

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 309

  YuskaitisC. J.MinesM. A.KingM. K.SweattJ. D.MillerC. A.JopeR. S. (2010). Lithium ameliorates altered glycogen synthase kinase-3 and behavior in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome. Biochem. Pharmacol.79, 632–646. 10.1016/j.bcp.2009.09.023

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 310

  ZanellaS.MebarekS.LajardA. M.PicardN.DutschmannM.HilaireG. (2008). Oral treatment with desipramine improves breathing and life span in Rett syndrome mouse model. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol.160, 116–121. 10.1016/j.resp.2007.08.009

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 311

  ZhangL.AlgerB. E. (2010). Enhanced endocannabinoid signaling elevates neuronal excitability in fragile X syndrome. J. Neurosci.30, 5724–5729. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0795-10.2010

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 312

  ZhangY.BonnanA.BonyG.FerezouI.PietropaoloS.GingerM.et al. (2014b). Dendritic channelopathies contribute to neocortical and sensory hyperexcitability in Fmr1(-/y) mice. Nat. Neurosci.17, 1701–1709. 10.1038/nn.3864

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 313

  ZhangY.BrownM. R.HylandC.ChenY.KronengoldJ.FlemingM. R.et al. (2012). Regulation of neuronal excitability by interaction of fragile X mental retardation protein with slack potassium channels. J. Neurosci.32, 15318–15327. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2162-12.2012

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 314

  ZhangW.PetersonM.BeyerB.FrankelW. N.ZhangZ. W. (2014a). Loss of MeCP2 from forebrain excitatory neurons leads to cortical hyperexcitation and seizures. J. Neurosci.34, 2754–2763. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4900-12.2014

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 315

  ZhangY.VenkitaramaniD. V.GladdingC. M.KurupP.MolnarE.CollingridgeG. L.et al. (2008). The tyrosine phosphatase STEP mediates AMPA receptor endocytosis after metabotropic glutamate receptor stimulation. J. Neurosci.28, 10561–10566. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2666-08.2008

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 316

  ZhangH.WebbD. J.AsmussenH.NiuS.HorwitzA. F. (2005). A GIT1/PIX/Rac/PAK signaling module regulates spine morphogenesis and synapse formation through MLC. J. Neurosci.25, 3379–3388. 10.1523/jneurosci.3553-04.2005

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 317

  ZhangZ. W.ZakJ. D.LiuH. (2010). MeCP2 is required for normal development of GABAergic circuits in the thalamus. J. Neurophysiol.103, 2470–2481. 10.1152/jn.00601.2009

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 318

  ZhengW. H.QuirionR. (2004). Comparative signaling pathways of insulin-like growth factor-1 and brain-derived neurotrophic factor in hippocampal neurons and the role of the PI3 kinase pathway in cell survival. J. Neurochem.89, 844–852. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02350.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 319

  ZiemssenT.KümpfelT.KlinkertW. E.NeuhausO.HohlfeldR. (2002). Glatiramer acetate-specific T-helper 1- and 2-type cell lines produce BDNF: implications for multiple sclerosis therapy. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Brain125, 2381–2391. 10.1093/brain/awf252

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 320

  ZingmanL. V.ParkS.OlsonT. M.AlekseevA. E.TerzicA. (2007). Aminoglycoside-induced translational read-through in disease: overcoming nonsense mutations by pharmacogenetic therapy. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther.81, 99–103. 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100012

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 321

  ZoghbiH. Y.BearM. F. (2012). Synaptic dysfunction in neurodevelopmental disorders associated with autism and intellectual disabilities. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.4, pii:a009886. 10.1101/cshperspect.a009886

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 322

  ZupanB.TothM. (2008). Inactivation of the maternal fragile X gene results in sensitization of GABAB receptor function in the offspring. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.327, 820–826. 10.1124/jpet.108.143990

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar