ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Diverse Intrinsic Properties Shape Functional Phenotype of Low-Frequency Neurons in the Auditory Brainstem
- 1Roxelyn and Richard Pepper Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United States
- 2Department of Biomedical Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States
- 3Program in Neuroscience Florida State University College of Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States
- 4Department of Neurobiology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United States
- 5The Hugh Knowles Hearing Research Center, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United States
In the auditory system, tonotopy is the spatial arrangement of where sounds of different frequencies are processed. Defined by the organization of neurons and their inputs, tonotopy emphasizes distinctions in neuronal structure and function across topographic gradients and is a common feature shared among vertebrates. In this study we characterized action potential firing patterns and ion channel properties from neurons located in the extremely low-frequency region of the chicken nucleus magnocellularis (NM), an auditory brainstem structure. We found that NM neurons responsible for encoding the lowest sound frequencies (termed NMc neurons) have enhanced excitability and fired bursts of action potentials to sinusoidal inputs ≤10 Hz; a distinct firing pattern compared to higher-frequency neurons. This response property was due to lower amounts of voltage dependent potassium (KV) conductances, unique combination of KV subunits and specialized sodium (NaV) channel properties. Particularly, NMc neurons had significantly lower KV1 and KV3 currents, but higher KV2 current. NMc neurons also showed larger and faster transient NaV current (INaT) with different voltage dependence of inactivation from higher-frequency neurons. In contrast, significantly smaller resurgent sodium current (INaR) was present in NMc with kinetics and voltage dependence that differed from higher-frequency neurons. Immunohistochemistry showed expression of NaV1.6 channel subtypes across the tonotopic axis. However, various immunoreactive patterns were observed between regions, likely underlying some tonotopic differences in INaT and INaR. Finally, using pharmacology and computational modeling, we concluded that KV3, KV2 channels and INaR work synergistically to regulate burst firing in NMc.
Topography in the vertebrate brain represents an orderly organization of neuronal architecture responsible for encoding sensory information. Topography in the auditory system is defined by tonotopy – the spatial arrangement of structures that subserve the processing of different sound frequencies. Tonotopy originates along the peripheral sensory epithelium and is preserved throughout the auditory system. Tonotopy in the central pathway is arranged not only by specific location of neurons and their inputs, but by differences in their structural and functional properties along the tonotopic axis (Koppl, 1994; Koppl and Carr, 1997; Brew and Forsythe, 2005; Wang et al., 2017). An example is the tonotopic arrangement of the avian nucleus magnocellularis (NM); the analog of the mammalian anteroventral cochlear nucleus. NM neurons are distributed from caudolateral to rostromedial, with neurons encoding the lowest sound frequencies for chickens located at the extreme caudolateral pole, referred here as NMc neurons (Rubel and Parks, 1975; Wang et al., 2017). Although the hearing range and sensitivity of many species of birds have been known for decades (Sachs et al., 1978), the majority of studies have focused on mid- to high-frequency regions. Few exceptions are the homing pigeon and the domesticated chicken, which can hear sounds as low as 2 Hz (i.e., infrasound) and as high as 9 kHz (Kreithen and Quine, 1979; Hill et al., 2014). However, as both studies noted, the birds’ perception of infrasound was unique compared to higher-frequency sounds, suggesting alternative mechanisms for encoding extremely low frequencies < 20 Hz (Schermuly and Klinke, 1990).
Indeed, we previously reported that low-frequency NMc neurons differ notably from higher-frequency NM neurons in several ways (Wang et al., 2017). First, NMc neurons have elaborate dendritic processes and form bouton synapses with auditory nerve inputs. Based on their heterogeneous dendritic structures, NMc neurons are further divided into two subtypes, denoted as NMc1 and NMc2. In contrast, mid- to high-frequency NM neurons located more rostrally are relatively homogenous, adendritic and receive input from a few auditory nerve fibers through large endbulb of Held synapses (Jhaveri and Morest, 1982a,b). Second, NMc neurons show enhanced neuronal excitability and distinct action potential (AP) firing patterns compared to their higher-frequency counterparts. NMc neurons are spontaneously active in vitro and able to fire repetitive APs in response to small amount of sustained current injections (i.e., low threshold current, Figures 1A,C) (Wang et al., 2017). Mid- to high-frequency NM neurons do not fire spontaneously in vitro, require higher threshold current and only generate a single onset AP in response to sustained current injections (Figures 1B,C) (Hong et al., 2016). NMc neurons also show significantly longer time constant and larger input resistance. Based on these aforementioned discrepancies across tonotopic regions, we hypothesized that NMc neurons have distinct voltage dependent potassium (KV) and sodium (NaV) channel properties, which play an important role in shaping specific physiological phenotype of NMc neurons.
FIGURE 1. Voltage dependent potassium (KV) current properties of NMc neurons. (A) Representative membrane response recorded from an NMc neuron to current injection of 200 pA for 100 ms. (B) Representative membrane response recorded from a mid- to high-frequency (M-HF) NM neuron to current injection of 500 pA for 100 ms. (C) Average population data showing differences in the number of APs as a function of current injection for NMc and mid- to high-frequency (M-HF) NM neurons. Data in (C) were modified from our previous study (see Wang et al., 2017; Figure 10D). (D) Representative KV current traces (IK) recorded from an NMc neuron, in response to membrane voltages clamped from –100 to +20 mV (Δ step = 5 mV, duration = 100 ms). The holding voltage is –70 mV. Steady-state (SS) KV currents were measured at the end of current traces (filled circle). (E) Population data showing the relationship of steady-state (SS) KV currents to membrane voltages (VMEMBRANE). Note that data point at –100 mV is not shown for simplicity. (F) Population data showing the KV current density (ρK) and conductance (GK) at the membrane voltage (VMEMBRANE) of +20 mV. Numbers in bars represent sample size. (G) Representative KV current traces (IK) in control and during drug application. Flx, fluoxetine (100 μM). DTx, dendrotoxin (0.1 μM). Symbols (circle, square, and diamond) at the end of current traces represent time window of measured steady-state (SS) KV currents. (H) Population data showing the relationship of steady-state (SS) KV currents to membrane voltages (VMEMBRANE) in control and during drug application. (I,J) Population data showing the percent reduction in steady-state (SS) KV currents due to the application of Flx (I) or DTx (J), at membrane voltages (VMEMBRANE) of +20, –10 and –45 mV. Error bar = standard error.
This hypothesis is partially supported by lower levels of KV channel immunoreactivity in the low-frequency, caudolateral region of NM (Parameshwaran et al., 2001; Fukui and Ohmori, 2004). Kuba and Ohmori (2009) also showed larger NaV current amplitude and higher NaV channel density, as indicated by stronger immunoreactivity, toward lower-frequency NM. Furthermore, we showed that NaV1.6-channel subtype is expressed in mid- to high-frequency NM and carry robust resurgent NaV current (INaR) (Hong et al., 2017). INaR is a prevalent property conserved in auditory structures of both avians and mammals and plays an important role in high-frequency AP firing of peripheral and brainstem neurons (Leao K.E. et al., 2006; Kim et al., 2010; Browne et al., 2017; Hong et al., 2017). It remains to be determined if NMc neurons have different NaV channel properties compared to mid- to high-frequency neurons and to what extent – if any – INaR present with tonotopic heterogeneity that contributes to the distinct AP firing pattern of NMc neurons.
The current study addresses these issues by characterizing the underlying KV and NaV channel properties that contribute to the functional phenotype of NMc neurons and is a follow-up to our first report regarding these neurons (Wang et al., 2017). To ensure fair comparisons across tonotopic regions of NM, we applied similar methods of electrophysiology, immunocytochemistry and computational modeling we previously reported (Hong et al., 2016, 2017). We found that NMc neurons burst fired at relatively fast rates to low-frequency sinusoidal current injections that was partially attributed to reduced KV1 and KV3 currents but higher KV2 currents – properties that differ from higher-frequency neurons (Hong et al., 2016). NMc neurons also presented with specialized NaV channel properties, including INaR. The presence of INaR increased availability of NaV channels and facilitated their recovery shortly after depolarization. Removal of INaR in our model NMc neuron reduced its capability to burst fire. Immunocytochemistry confirmed the expression of KV3.1, KV2.2, and NaV1.6 in NMc and demonstrated their distinct distribution patterns. The synergy of KV3-, KV2-containing channels and INaR help shape the functional phenotype of NMc neurons and highlights the significant biological variation of the auditory brainstem in processing sound information of varying frequencies.
Materials and Methods
All animal procedures were approved by the Northwestern University and Florida State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees and conducted in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. For electrophysiological experiments, acute brainstem slices were prepared from White Leghorn chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) embryos of either sex as previously described (Sanchez et al., 2011; Hong et al., 2016). Briefly, embryos were rapidly decapitated and the brain was dissected from the skull to isolate the brainstem region of interest. This procedure is consistent with the recommendation from the Panel on Euthanasia of the American Veterinary Medical Association and is appropriate for the species, stages of development and size of the embryos. Eggs were obtained from Sunnyside Farms, Inc. (Beaver Dam, WI, United States) and incubated in the central auditory physiology laboratory at Northwestern University. For immunohistochemical experiments, chicken hatchlings of either sex were used. Eggs were obtained from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA, United States) and incubated in a Florida State University vivarium.
Brainstem Slice Preparation
Ages for electrophysiological study were embryonic days (E) 19–21, when near-mature hearing ability of chickens is established. Briefly, the brainstem was dissected and isolated in oxygenated low-Ca2+ high-Mg2+ modified artificial cerebral spinal fluid (ACSF) containing the following (in mM): 130 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 26 NaHCO3, 3 MgCl2, 1 CaCl2, and 10 glucose. ACSF was continuously bubbled with a mixture of 95% O2/5% CO2 (pH 7.4, osmolarity 295-310 mOsm/l). The brainstem was blocked coronally, affixed to the stage of a vibratome slicing chamber (Ted Pella, Inc., Redding, CA, United States) and submerged in ACSF. Bilaterally symmetrical coronal slices were made (200 μm thick) and approximately seven slices containing NM were taken from caudal to rostral, roughly representing the low-to-high frequency regions, respectively. The caudal-most two to three slices were used in the current study (Wang et al., 2017).
Slices were collected in a custom holding chamber and allowed to equilibrate for 1 h at ∼22°C in aforementioned ACSF, but with 1 MgCl2 and 3 CaCl2 instead. Normal ACSF was continuously bubbled with a mixture of 95% O2/5% CO2 (pH 7.4, osmolarity 295–310 mOsm/l). Slices were transferred to a recording chamber mounted on an Olympus BX51W1 (Center Valley, PA, United States) microscope. The microscope was equipped with a CCD camera, 60× water-immersion objective and infrared differential interference contrast optics. The recording chamber was superfused continuously (Welco, Tokyo, Japan) at room temperatures (monitored continuously at ∼22°C, Warner Instruments, Hamden, CT, United States) in oxygenated normal ACSF at a rate of 1.5–2 ml/min. In a subset of experiments, recording temperature was increased to 35°C (see Figure 5).
In Vitro Whole Cell Electrophysiology
Voltage- and current-clamp experiments were performed using an Axon Multiclamp 700B amplifier (Molecular Devices, Silicon Valley, CA, United States). Patch pipettes were pulled to a tip diameter of 1–2 μm using a P-97 flaming/brown micropipette puller (Sutter Instrument, Novato, CA, United States) and had resistances ranging from 3 to 6 MΩ. For voltage-clamp experiments of isolated KV currents, the internal solution contained the following (in mM): 105 K-gluconate, 35 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 10 HEPES-K+, 5 EGTA, 4 4-Mg2ATP, 0.3 4-Tris2GTP, pH adjusted to 7.3–7.4 with KOH. The junction potential was ∼-10 mV and data were corrected accordingly. For voltage-clamp experiments of isolated NaV currents, the internal solution was cesium-based and contained the following (in mM): 150 CsCl, 10 NaCl, 0.2 EGTA, 10 HEPES, pH adjusted to 7.3–7.4 with CsOH. The junction potential was ∼-3 mV and data were not corrected. The Cs-based internal solution was used to block KV currents and reduce space-clamp issues. Series resistance was compensated for by ∼80% in all voltage-clamp recordings. For current-clamp experiments, the internal solution was the same as used for recording KV currents. The junction potential (∼-10 mV) was not corrected for in our current-clamp experiments.
Pipettes were visually guided to the caudolateral region of NM, termed NMc, where neurons were identified and distinguished from surrounding tissue based on cell morphology, known structure, and location of the nucleus within the slice, as described in our recent study (Wang et al., 2017). After a GΩ seal was attained, membrane patches were ruptured and neurons were first held in the voltage-clamp mode of whole-cell configuration. A small hyperpolarizing (-1 mV, 30 ms) voltage command was presented at the beginning of each recorded trace to document and monitor whole-cell parameters (cell membrane capacitance, series resistance and input resistance). Neurons were included in the data analysis only if they had series resistances < 15 MΩ. For recording NaV current, raw data was low-pass filtered at 5 kHz and digitized at 50 kHz using a Digidata 1440A (Molecular Devices). For recording KV current and current-clamp experiments, raw data was low-pass filtered at 2 or 5 kHz and digitized at 20 or 50 kHz.
All experiments were conducted in the presence of picrotoxin (PTX, 100 μM, a GABAA receptor antagonist), DL-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (DL-APV, 100 μM, an NMDA receptor antagonist) and 6-Cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2, 3-dione (CNQX, 20 μM, an AMPA receptor antagonist). Isolated KV currents were recorded in the presence of the NaV channel blocker tetrodotoxin (TTx, 1 μM) and isolated NaV currents were recorded with bath application of KV channel blockers tetraethylammonium (TEA, 3 mM) and 4-AP (30 μM), along with CdCl2 (0.2 mM) to block calcium channels. Fluoxetine (Flx, 100 μM), a highly potent blocker of KV3.1-containing channels (Sung et al., 2008), was bath applied to estimate the ratio of KV3 mediated currents to the total KV current. In a subset of experiments, TEA (1 mM) was substituted for Flx. Percent reduction of KV current during application of Flx (n = 10) or TEA (n = 8) was compared at membrane voltages of -45, -10, and +20 mV. Since no difference was observed (p = 0.556, 0.449, and 0.593, respectively), data were pooled. Dendrotoxin (DTx, 0.1 μM), a potent blocker of KV1.1, KV1.2-containing channels, was bath applied to estimate the ratio of KV1 mediated currents. Guangxitoxin (GxTx, 100 nM), a highly specific blocker of KV2.1, KV2.2-containing channels (Liu and Bean, 2014), was used to estimate the ratio of KV2 mediated currents. Potassium leak currents were measured offline using the averaged responses to hyperpolarizing voltage commands from -80 to -90 mV as a baseline and were subtracted from the raw data.
Total KV conductances (GK) and NaV conductances (GNa) were obtained by the equation IK/Na = GK/Na (VMEMBRANE – EK/Na). IK and INa represent the potassium and sodium current measured in response to membrane voltage (VMEMBRANE), respectively. Based on our external and internal recording solutions, the reversal potential for KV channels (EK) was -84 mV. The reversal potential for NaV channels (ENa) was estimated by linear extrapolation from the current-voltage relationship of each individual neuron. In addition, current density (ρK/Na) was calculated by normalizing isolated currents to the individual membrane capacitance. The voltage dependence curves of NaV channel inactivation (hNa) were fitted using a Boltzmann function where hNa = 1/[1+e(VMEMBRANE - V1/2)/k], in order to calculate half inactivation voltage (V1/2) and slope factor (k).
NaV current data were obtained from the second and third most caudal slices, representing the majority of NMc1 neurons (Wang et al., 2017). Transient NaV current (INaT) obtained by step depolarization to -30 mV (holding voltage = -60 mV) was used for characterizing two NaV current properties for individual NMc neurons: kinetics and reliability. NaV current kinetics contains three variables: rise and fall rates, and half width. Rise and fall rates were defined as the maximal rate of rise and decay of INaT, respectively. Half width was calculated as INaT duration measured at half of the maximum amplitude. In order to quantify INaT reliability, we applied the same voltage step over 30 repetitive trials (interpulse stimulus intervals = 2 s). Reliability was defined as the range of peak occurrences of 30 INaT evoked (Hong et al., 2016) and is a measure of peak latency jitter (i.e., larger jitter results in less reliable generation of NaV current). The INaT kinetics were also obtained and averaged over these 30 trials.
To isolate and characterize the resurgent and persistent NaV currents (INaR and INaP, respectively) for NMc neurons regarding their relatively small amplitude, we ran the voltage-clamp protocols (see section “Results” for details) repetitively before and during application of TTx (1 μM). The currents shown in Figure 7 were obtained by subtracting the TTx-insensitive current traces from the control traces. Capacitive currents generated during voltage-clamp recordings were blanked or reduced offline.
Under current-clamp mode, NMc neurons were held in whole-cell configuration at I = 0 for recording AP properties. APs were evoked by injecting a sustained current command of 200 pA (duration = 100 ms), and two variables regarding AP kinetics were measured before and during application of specific blockers (TEA or GxTx): AP half width and fall rate. Half width was quantified as AP duration measured at half of the maximum amplitude relative to the resting membrane potential. Fall rate was calculated as the maximal rate of decay in the AP repolarizing phase. Both AP properties were measured and averaged over 30 repetitive trials. In addition, we injected suprathreshold sinusoidal currents with the amplitude of 200 or 300 pA to characterize the frequency-firing responses of NMc neurons (Hong et al., 2016). The frequencies of sinusoidal currents were 5, 10, 40, 50, 75, 100, 150, and 200 Hz. Evoked APs per sinusoidal cycle (for simplicity, “APs per cycle”) were calculated as the number of APs divided by the total number of sinusoidal cycles and plotted as a function of stimulus frequency. Inter-spike interval (ISI) for responses at each frequency was calculated and plotted as histograms. We observed burst firing of NMc neurons to sinusoidal inputs of 5 and 10 Hz (i.e., generation of multiple APs per cycle, see Figure 5). Therefore, ISI was calculated for APs evoked within each sinusoidal cycle, while intervals between two consecutive cycles (mostly > 40 ms) were dismissed. By doing this, the histogram of ISI reflected the burst firing rate per cycle in response to sinusoidal stimulation of 5 and 10 Hz. In contrast, NMc neurons fired only one AP per sinusoidal cycle to input frequency > 40 Hz. The calculation of ISI was based on a previous study (Pilati et al., 2012), and thus ISI was defined as the interval between two consecutive APs.
Recording protocols were written and run using Clampex acquisition and Clampfit analysis software (version 10.3; Molecular Devices, Silicon Valley, CA, United States). Statistical analyses and graphing protocols were performed using Prism (GraphPad versions 7.0b, La Jolla, CA, United States) and MATLAB (version R2014b; The MathWorks, Natick, MA, United States) software. Student t-tests or analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post hoc Bonferroni adjusted t-tests were used to determine significance, unless otherwise mentioned. The standard for significant differences was defined as p < 0.05. Numeric values in the texts and Table 1 are reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Error bars in Figures 1–8 represent standard error of the mean (SEM).
FIGURE 2. KV2 mediated current in NMc neurons. (A) Representative activation phase of KV current traces (activation IK) with normalization (norm) in control and during drug application. Flx, fluoxetine (100 μM). DTx, dendrotoxin (0.1 μM). (B) Population data showing the time constant (tau) of KV current activation phase. (C) Representative KV current traces (IK) in control and during drug application. GxTx, Guangxitoxin (100 nM). Symbols (circle and hexagon) at the end of current traces represent time window of measured steady-state (SS) KV currents. (D) Population data showing the relationship of steady-state (SS) KV currents to membrane voltages (VMEMBRANE) in control and during drug application. (E) Population data showing the percent reduction in steady-state (SS) KV currents due to the application of GxTx, at membrane voltages (VMEMBRANE) of +20, –10, and –45 mV. Error bar = standard error. ∗p < 0.05.
FIGURE 3. KV2- and KV3-containing channels regulate action potential (AP) kinetics for NMc neurons. (A) Representative membrane responses recorded from an NMc neuron in control, during application of GxTx and during washout process. The amplitude of current injection is 200 pA for 100 ms. Arrowhead points to the evident membrane depolarization during AP firing under GxTx. Asterisk denotes the failure of AP. Inset shows superimposed first APs under three conditions. (B,E) Representative APs with normalization (norm) in control and during drug application. GxTx, Guangxitoxin (100 nM). TEA, tetraethylammonium (1 mM). (C,F) Population data showing AP half width in control and during drug application. (D,G) Population data showing AP fall rate (in absolute value) in control and during drug application. G represents GxTx. Error bar = standard error. Numbers in bars represent sample size. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001.
FIGURE 4. Voltage dependent sodium (NaV) current properties of NMc neurons. (A) Representative transient NaV current traces (INa) recorded from an NMc neuron, in response to step depolarization to –30 mV (holding voltage = –60 mV). (B) Population data showing the NaV current (INa) kinetics, including rise rate (in absolute value), fall rate and half width, along with reliability. These properties were measured at the membrane voltage (VMEMBRANE) of –30 mV. Numbers in bars represent sample size. (C) Representative transient NaV current traces (INa) in response to varying step depolarizations from –40 to 0 mV (Δ step = 5 mV, holding voltage = –60 mV). (D) Population data showing the NaV current-voltage relationship (filled circles), along with normalized NaV conductance (G/GMAX) as a function of membrane voltage (VMEMBRANE) for NMc neurons (open circles). (E) Population data showing the NaV current density (ρNa) and conductance (GNa) at the membrane voltage (VMEMBRANE) of –30 mV. (F) Representative transient NaV current traces (INa) in response to step depolarization to –30 mV following pre-pulse holding voltages clamped from –90 to –30 mV (Δ step = 5 mV). (G) Population data showing voltage dependence of NaV current inactivation for NMc neurons. hNa was calculated as the NaV current recorded from each holding voltage (I) normalized to the maximum current across all trials (IMAX) and plotted as a function of the pre-pulse holding voltage. (H) Population data showing the half inactivation voltage (V1/2) and slope factor (k) for voltage dependence of inactivation. Error bar = standard error.
FIGURE 5. Frequency-firing pattern of NMc neurons to sinusoidal current injections. (A,B) Representative voltage traces recorded from NMc neurons in response to 5, 75, and 150 Hz sinusoidal current injections at 22°C (A) or 35°C (B) recording temperature. The strength of sinusoidal current injections is 200 or 300 pA. (C) Population data showing the evoked APs per sinusoidal cycle plotted as a function of stimulus frequency for NMc neurons. (D) Histogram of the inter-spike intervals (ISIs) calculated from APs in response to 5 and 75 Hz sinusoidal current injections. Error bar = standard error.
FIGURE 6. KV2- and KV3-containing channels regulate burst firing for NMc neurons. (A,C) Representative voltage responses to the first cycle of 5 Hz sinusoidal current injections in control (black) and during the application (red) of TEA (A) or GxTx (C). TEA, tetraethylammonium (1 mM). GxTx, Guangxitoxin (100 nM). (B,D) Population data showing APs per cycle and inter-spike interval (ISI) in response to 5 Hz sinusoidal current injections, in control and during the application of TEA (B) or GxTx (D). Error bar = standard error. Numbers in bars represent sample size. ∗p < 0.05. (E,F) Representative voltage responses recorded from an NMc neuron to 5 Hz sinusoidal current injections in control (black) and during dual drug application (red) of GxTx and TEA. Gray area of the second sinusoidal cycle in (E) was expanded and shown in (F).
FIGURE 7. Resurgent NaV current (INaR) of NMc neurons. (A–C) Representative current traces in response to voltage-clamp protocols that elicit INaR (if any) shown below traces. The amplitude of the conditioning step is +30 mV in (A), 0 mV in (B) and –30 mV in (C). The duration of the conditioning step is 10 ms. (D) Population data showing the INaR amplitude plotted as a function of repolarizing membrane voltage (VMEMBRANE) for NMc neurons, in response to the conditioning step shown in (A,B). (E,F) Population data showing the INaR time to peak (E) and decay time constant (tau, F) as a function of repolarizing membrane voltage (VMEMBRANE), in response to conditioning step of +30 mV. Error bar = standard error.
FIGURE 8. INaR helps increase NaV channel availability and facilitates NaV recovery. (A,B) Representative current traces in response to voltage-clamp protocols shown below traces. The conditioning step is +30 mV for 5 ms in (A) (Open Channel Block State) and –30 mV for 40 ms in (B) (Inactivation State). Δt represents the varying recovery time, increasing from 2 to 30 ms in steps of 2 ms. (C) Population data showing the NaV channel availability (%) as a function of recovery time. In order to calculate NaV channel availability, a reference pulse to 0 mV was applied to NMc neurons (not shown in the figure). The amplitude of recovered NaV current was first adjusted by subtracting the steady-state current that remained at the end of the conditioning step, before being normalized to the reference pulse. The recovery trajectory was fit by a single exponential, in order to obtain recovery time constant (tau) shown in (D). (D) Population data showing the recovery time constant (tau) under two different condition states. Numbers in bars represent sample size. Error bar = standard error. ∗p < 0.05.
All bath applied drugs were allowed to perfuse through the recording chamber for ∼5 min before subsequent recordings. DL-APV, CNQX and all other salts and chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, United States), PTX and Flx from Tocris (Ellisville, MO, United States), TTx, DTx, and GxTx from Alomone Labs (Jerusalem, Israel), and TEA from VWR (Radnor, PA, United States).
Simulation of NMc electrical activity were performed in NEURON 7.1 (Hines and Carnevale, 1997) by employing a single-compartment model (Table 2). The NMc model was based on our NM model previously described and all ion currents were modeled using the same formalism (Tables 2, 3, Hong et al., 2017; Lu et al., 2017). Briefly, this model contains currents mediated by low- and high-voltage activated potassium (K+LV A and K+HV A, respectively) channels, NaV, and passive leak channels. K+LV A, K+HV A, and passive leak channels were modeled in HH type formalisms (Rothman and Manis, 2003; Howard and Rubel, 2010; Hong et al., 2017; Lu et al., 2017). NaV channel was modeled with a Markovian 13-state model, which generates the INaT, INaP, and INaR components simultaneously (Khaliq et al., 2003). All ion channel parameters were adjusted to match the experimental data obtained from E19–21 NMc neurons (Table 3). Parameters of K+LV A and K+HV A were adjusted such that the current-voltage curve of the model replicated that of the experimental data recorded from NMc neurons (see Figures 9A,B). Parameters of NaV were adjusted such that spike threshold and amplitude were similar between the model and the experimental data obtained from NMc neurons. To switch off INaR without affecting the INaT and INaP, we applied the method described by Magistretti et al. (2006) and Hong et al. (2017). Kinetic constants were modified as follows: the rate constant for the O->OB transition, 𝜀, was set to 0, Oon, and Ooff were increased to 2.15 and 0.01433 ms-1 to restore the kinetics of INaT and the amplitude of INaP, respectively (see Figures 9E,F).
FIGURE 9. Simulations of ion channel properties and firing activity from model NMc neuron. (A) Simulated KV current traces (IK) from model NMc neuron, in response to membrane voltages clamped from –100 to +20 mV (Δ step = 5 mV, duration = 100 ms). Steady-state (SS) KV currents were measured at the end of current traces (filled circle). (B) Current-voltage relationship of simulated IK from model NMc neuron (solid line), superimposed with experimental population data shown in Figure 1E (dots). (C) Simulated NaV current traces in response to voltage-clamp protocols that elicit INaR shown below traces. (D) Current-voltage relationship of simulated INaR from model NMc neuron. (E) Simulated transient NaV currents (INaT) in response to step depolarization to 0 mV (holding voltage = –90 mV). INaT obtained under control condition is shown in black. Switching off INaR by setting the rate constant for the O–>OB transition, 𝜀, to zero resulted in considerable slowing of INaT decay (‘0-INaR-’ condition, blue trace). INaT kinetics were restored by setting rate constant Oon to 2.15 ms-1 and Ooff to 0.01433 ms-1 (‘0-INaR+’ condition, red trace). (F) Simulated INaR in control (black) and in “0-INaR+” condition (red). Removal of INaR in “0-INaR+” condition has no effect on persistent NaV current (INaP). (G) Simulated AP firing from model NMc neuron in response to sustained current injection at 352 pA for 100 ms. (H) Simulated NaV current trace underlying the firing activity shown in (G). Arrowhead points to the area that was expanded in inset. Arrow points to the generation of INaR immediately after an INaT.
For KV3.1b and KV2.2, chicken hatchlings (P2–14; n = 6) were transcardially perfused with 0.9% saline followed by 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB). For NaV1.6, chicken hatchlings (P2–14; n = 4) were transcardially perfused with 0.9% saline followed by modified periodate–lysin–paraformaldehyde (PLP) fixative (ml/g body weight): 0.2% (w/v) paraformaldehyde, 2.7% (w/v) lysin HCl, 0.21% (w/v) NaIO4, and 0.1% (w/v) Na2HPO4 (Kuba et al., 2005). Following post-fix overnight in the same fixatives, brains were then transferred to 30% sucrose in PB for 3 days and sectioned in the coronal plane at 30 μm on a freezing sliding microtome. Each section was collected in 0.01 M phosphate buffered saline (PBS).
For KV3.1b immunostaining, free-floating sections were incubated with primary antibody (Sigma; AB5188) solutions diluted 1: 10,000 in PBS with 0.3% Triton X-100 overnight at 4°C. Sections were then incubated in a biotinylated IgG antibody (1:200; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, United States) diluted in PBS with 0.3% Triton X-100 for an hour at room temperature. After washing in PBS, sections were incubated in avidin–biotin–peroxidase complex solution (ABC Elite kit; Vector Laboratories) diluted 1:100 in PBS with 0.3% Triton X-100 for 1 h at room temperature. Sections were then washed in PBS and incubated for 3–5 min in 0.045% 3-3-diaminobenzidine (Sigma) with 0.03% hydrogen peroxide in PB. Sections were mounted on gelatin-coated slides and dehydrated, cleared, and cover slipped with Permount mounting medium (Fisher Scientific). The antibody has been fully characterized regarding its specificity of recognizing the chicken KV3.1b (Parameshwaran et al., 2001) and used for studying the chicken auditory brainstem (Lu et al., 2004).
Anti-NaV1.6 antibody was generously provided by Dr. Hiroshi Kuba at Kyoto University (Kuba et al., 2006). Following primary antibody incubation (1:1000 diluted in PBS with 0.3% Triton X-100), sections were incubated in Alexa-Fluor secondary antibodies (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, United States) at 1:1000 overnight at 4°C. Sections were double stained with a somatodendritic marker, the microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2, Millipore; MAB3418) (Wang and Rubel, 2008). Sections were then mounted on gelatin-coated slides and cover slipped with Fluoromount-G mounting medium® (Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL, United States). The specificity of this antibody recognizing the chicken NaV1.6 was fully characterized (Kuba et al., 2006).
For KV2.2 immunostaining, a peptide containing the amino acids 47–60 (EVLWRTLDRLPtRTR) from the chicken KV2.2 (Accession number XM_003640825) was synthesized and used as antigen to immunize male rabbits (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, United States). The generated antibody (KV2-19) was affinity purified and tested for specificity in western blots. 40 μg of protein lysate derived from chicken brainstem was used for western blot assay as previously described (Zorio et al., 2017). Free-floating sections were treated with 0.25% pepsin in 5 mM HCl for 15 min at 37°C, followed by primary antibody solution diluted 1: 5,000 in PBS with 0.3% Triton X-100 overnight at 4°C. Sections were incubated in Alexa-Fluor secondary antibodies, mounted, and cover slipped as described above.
Quantification of NaV1.6 Immunoreactivity in the Axon Initial Segment
Three animals (P2, P4, and P11) were used for this analysis. Using an Olympus FV1200 confocal microscope, image stacks of different NM subregions were collected with 60× oil-immersion lens at a resolution of 0.1 μm per pixel at XY dimensions and with a Z interval of 0.5 μm. These imaging settings provide sufficient resolution for accurate identification and reconstruction of NaV1.6 immunoreactive segments. Olympus OIB image stacks were directly imported to Neurolucida (version 9.03; MBF Bioscience). Intact segments with both ends contained within the same stack were used for subsequent 3D reconstruction. The NaV1.6 immunoreactive segments were traced with lines through the center. Based on this reconstruction, the length is measured using Neurolucida Explorer (version 9.03; MBF Bioscience). No tissue shrinkage correction was applied. For each segment, the diameter was measured at three different locations of the middle portion of the segment using ImageJ software and averaged. As no differences were seen between ages from P2 to P11, the length and diameter of NaV1.6 immunoreactive segments from the same NM subregions were pooled across the three animals. These parameters were compared among subregions using one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons using Prism software (Table 4). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All data are shown as mean ± SD in the text and in Figure 12.
Our previous study showed distinct active and passive membrane properties of NMc neurons (Wang et al., 2017). NMc neurons are more excitable (Figure 1A) than their higher-frequency counterparts (Figure 1B) and are capable of firing multiple APs to increasing current injection strength (Figure 1C). However, NMc neurons have slower AP kinetics and a significantly longer time constant; due in part to their higher input resistance. Here, we investigated KV and NaV channel properties underlying this unique physiology of NMc neurons. We compared these properties between NMc and mid- to high-frequency NM neurons (for simplicity, “adendritic NM neurons”) (Hong et al., 2016). In addition, we characterized the frequency-firing pattern of NMc neurons to sinusoidal current injections, as well as the role of KV and NaV channels in shaping this firing pattern phenotype. Electrophysiological data were obtained from 210 NMc neurons at E19-21.
Distinct KV Current Properties of NMc Neurons
We previously showed that low- (K+LV A) and high-voltage (K+HV A) activated potassium channels regulate neuronal excitability and AP kinetics in NM, respectively (Hong et al., 2016). Therefore, we hypothesized that NMc neurons have significantly less K+LV A and K+HV A currents (especially KV3 and KV1 mediated currents) than adendritic NM neurons. To test our hypothesis, voltage-clamp recordings of KV current were performed. NMc neurons were held at -70 mV before being clamped by 100 ms steps to membrane voltages ranging from -100 to +20 mV, with a 5 mV increment. Steady-state KV current was measured at the end of each current trace and plotted as a function of membrane voltage (Figure 1D, filled circle and Figure 1E). We observed significantly lower amount of total KV currents for NMc neurons, which was 2.83 ± 0.90 nA at +20 mV, as compared to 6.24 ± 1.33 nA for adendritic NM neurons (p < 0.0001, Table 1). Figure 1F shows the population data of KV current density and total conductance at +20 mV for NMc neurons and when compared to adendritic neurons, both of them are significantly smaller (p < 0.0001, Table 1). Taken together, NMc neurons showed lower amount of KV current, as a result of reduced total conductance and lower density of KV channels.
We further characterized the ratio of KV current that is mediated by different KV channel subunits. Flx or 1 mM TEA was bath applied to block KV3-containing channels (Figure 1G left and middle, Figure 1H). Data using two different drugs were pooled. The percent of current reduction during drug application was calculated at three membrane voltages: -45, -10, and +20 mV. In line with KV3 function as K+HV A channels, the greatest reduction (∼40%) was observed at positive membrane voltage (i.e., +20 mV), and the percent change significantly decreased from +20 to -45 mV (Figure 1I, p = 0.0002, repeated measures ANOVA). We observed a minor amount of KV current reduced at -45 mV (∼9%), likely due to the non-specific blockade of other KV subunits by Flx or TEA (Tytgat et al., 1997; Johnston et al., 2010). Subsequent application of DTx was used to block KV1-containing channels (Figure 1G right, Figure 1H). As expected, the greatest current reduction during DTx application was found at -45 mV (Figure 1J), because KV1-containing channels are activated around the resting membrane potential (Johnston et al., 2010; Hong et al., 2016). At +20 mV, DTx sensitive current accounted for only ∼25% of total KV currents, although this difference between voltages is not significant (Figure 1J, p = 0.078).
We next investigated which KV channel subunits likely mediate the remaining 35% (Figure 1E) of total KV currents at +20 mV. We noticed that dual application of Flx and DTx slowed down the activation kinetics of KV current at +20 mV (Figure 2A). Current traces +20 mV in Figure 2A were taken from Figure 1G and were normalized to highlight the difference in their activation phase. A single exponential was fit to the dominant component of activation phase and a time constant (tau) of KV activation was calculated (Rathouz and Trussell, 1998; Liu and Bean, 2014). We found a significant increase in activation time constant after dual application of Flx and DTx (p = 0.018, post hoc Bonferroni adjusted t-tests), but not with Flx only (p = 0.717, Figure 2B). Application of DTx has no effect on activation kinetics of KV current (Owen et al., 1997) and changes in activation time constant is likely attributable to properties of remaining currents. KV3- and KV1-containing channels are well known to activate in an extremely fast manner (Rathouz and Trussell, 1998; Johnston et al., 2010), and thus potential KV channel subunits mediating the remaining current are likely presented with significantly slower kinetics. In addition, half activation voltage (V1/2) of the remaining current is ∼-11 mV. These observations of the remaining current largely resembled the KV2 mediated current reported elsewhere, such as neurons in medial nucleus of trapezoid body (MNTB) and in superior cervical ganglion (Johnston et al., 2008; Liu and Bean, 2014). Therefore, we applied a specific KV2 blocker (Guangxitoxin, GxTx) on NMc neurons and it reduced ∼30% of total KV currents at +20 mV (Figures 2C–E). Due to the high-voltage activation property of KV2-containing channels, maximal reduction occurred at +20 mV, whereas little amount of current was blocked at -45 mV (Figure 2E, p = 0.007, repeated measures ANOVA). Finally, triple application of GxTx, Flx, and DTx abolished the majority of steady-state KV current in NMc neurons (Figure 2D). In summary, our results revealed a unique combination of KV channel subunits in NMc neurons; KV1-, KV2-, and KV3-containing channels mediated ∼25, ∼30, and ∼40% of total current at positive membrane voltage, respectively. This combination of KV channel subunits is in distinct contrast to that of adendritic NM neurons, in which KV1- and KV3-containing channels each account for approximately half of total current, while the presence of KV2 mediated current is minimal (Kuba et al., 2015; Hong et al., 2016). The comparison also confirmed that KV1 and KV3 mediated currents in NMc neurons are significantly less than adendritic NM neurons (Table 1).
Role of KV3- and KV2-Containing Channels in Regulating AP Kinetics of NMc Neurons
KV3- and KV2-containing channels are both K+HV A channels and contribute to the repolarizing phase of APs (Rudy and McBain, 2001; Johnston et al., 2010). Blockade of these channels leads to a significant increase in AP duration and a slowing of AP falling phase (Liu and Bean, 2014; Kimm et al., 2015; Hong et al., 2016). However, maximal activation of KV2-containing channels only occurs at the late phase of the AP repolarization due to their slow kinetics, and thus these channels are suggested to play a secondary role in regulating AP kinetics compared to other fast-activating KV channels in mammalian neurons (Johnston et al., 2010; Liu and Bean, 2014; Kimm et al., 2015). Based on previous studies, we hypothesized that KV3- and KV2-containing channels both regulate AP repolarizing kinetics for NMc neurons, but to a different extent. To test this hypothesis, we injected a sustained (100 ms) current command with the strength of 200 pA to evoke APs in NMc neurons. This current strength is well above the average threshold current of NMc neurons, as shown in our recent study (∼40 pA) (Wang et al., 2017). Bath application of GxTx resulted in a depolarized after hyperpolarization time period following AP firing (Figure 3A left and middle, arrowhead) and reduced the number of APs (Figure 3A middle, asterisk). Washout of GxTx restored the AP response properties to control values (Figure 3A left and right). Analysis of first AP revealed a slight but significant increase in AP half width (Figure 3A middle, inset, Figures 3B,C, p = 0.006, paired t-test). A more dramatic increase in half width was observed after subsequent application of 1 mM TEA (Figures 3B,C, p = 0.028). Similarly, AP fall rate reduced significantly during GxTx application (p = 0.001), but the reduction after dual application of GxTx and TEA was most prominent (p = 0.003, Figures 3B,D). When we applied TEA alone, the percent changes in AP half width and fall rate were significant (p = 0.002 and p < 0.0001, respectively) and larger than those with GxTx application (Figures 3E–G). For example, GxTx application increased AP half width by ∼16% on average while TEA application by ∼87% (p = 0.001). Taken together, KV3- and KV2-containing channels both regulate AP repolarizing kinetics for NMc neurons, but KV3-containing channels play a more dominant role, probably as a result of the following facts: first, KV3-containing channels activate much earlier than KV2-containing channels during short AP period; second, KV3 mediated current is larger than KV2 mediated current in NMc neurons (see above).
Distinct NaV Current Properties of NMc Neurons
NaV channels play a critical role in AP generation and thus may be another factor that subserves AP firing pattern of NMc neurons (Eijkelkamp et al., 2012). To test this prediction, we first profiled the properties of NaV current for NMc neurons. NaV current data were obtained from the second and third most caudal slices, representing the majority of NMc1 neurons (Wang et al., 2017). Figure 4A shows a transient NaV current (INaT) in response to step depolarization to -30 mV (holding voltage = -60 mV). This current was used to characterize the kinetics (i.e., rise rate, fall rate, and half width) and reliability of INaT for individual NMc neuron (see section “Materials and Methods”), the population data of which are shown in Figure 4B.
We next characterized the voltage dependence of INaT activation and inactivation for NMc neurons. Individual NMc neuron was held at -60 mV before being clamped at membrane voltages from -60 to +30 mV, with a 5 mV increment. Figure 4C shows the representative current traces in response to varying membrane voltages. The amplitudes of INaT and normalized conductance were plotted as a function of membrane voltage in Figure 4D (filled and open circles, respectively). As indicated by Figure 4D, NaV current density and total conductance were near maximum at -30 mV, the population data of which are shown in Figure 4E. Furthermore, to characterize the inactivation property of INaT, NMc neurons were held at membrane voltages ranging from -90 to -30 mV with a 5 mV increment, followed by a step depolarization to -30 mV (Figure 4F). The amplitude of INaT generated from each holding voltage was normalized to the maximal amplitude across all trials and plotted as a function of holding voltage (Figure 4G). A Boltzmann function was fit for each normalized curve and half inactivation voltage (V1/2) and slope factor (k) were calculated (Figure 4H, see section “Materials and Methods”). Comparisons of the aforementioned properties between NMc neurons and their higher-frequency counterparts revealed several significant differences (Table 1). First, NMc neurons showed faster INaT fall rate (p = 0.022) and generated INaT more reliably (i.e., smaller reliability range, p = 0.003). It should be noted that reliability (and jitter) were compared near membrane voltage that elicited the largest INaT. This membrane voltage maximized the electrochemical driving force for sodium ions and thus ensured fair comparisons between NMc and adendritic NM neurons. Second, NMc neurons (mainly NMc1) displayed larger INaT (p = 0.002). This result is consistent with our immunohistochemical findings (see below and section “Discussion”). Third, this amplitude difference was due to a significantly higher total conductance of NMc neurons (p = 0.011) but not to NaV current density (p = 0.687). Forth, NMc neurons showed a more depolarized voltage dependence of inactivation, demonstrated by a significantly less negative V1/2 (p = 0.002). Finally, the slope factor of the inactivation curve (k) was smaller in NMc neurons, indicating a steeper inactivation curve than that reported from adendritic NM neurons (p = 0.027) (Hong et al., 2016). These differences might reflect distinction in NaV α-subunits and/or the auxiliary β-subunits (see section “Discussion”).
Frequency-Firing Pattern of NMc Neurons to Sinusoidal Current Injections
Numerous studies have demonstrated the important role of KV and NaV channels in regulating neuronal AP firing patterns (For review see Bean, 2007). To further investigate the function of these channels across the tonotopic axis, we used sinusoidal current injections to document frequency-firing pattern of NMc neurons. Based on their KV and NaV current properties, we hypothesized distinct frequency-firing patterns to sinusoidal inputs of NMc neurons compared to higher-frequency NM neurons. We applied suprathreshold sinusoidal current injections (200/300 pA) with frequencies ranging from 5 to 200 Hz and calculated APs per cycle (see section “Materials and Methods”). NMc neurons generated burst firing of APs in response to the rising phase of 5 Hz sinusoidal cycles (Figure 5A, left and Figure 5C). Burst firing was also observed at 10 Hz with reduced APs per cycle (Figure 5C). In response to 40 Hz sinusoidal current injections, NMc neurons fired an AP per cycle on average, but APs per cycle dropped to ∼0.5 at 75 Hz (Figure 5A, middle and Figure 5C), which indicates that NMc neurons were only able to fire at ∼37.5 Hz on average to the 75 Hz input (i.e., AP failures on every other cycle). As the stimulus frequency increased, APs per cycle reduced dramatically and only a few APs were observed in response to 150 Hz stimulation (Figure 5A, right and Figure 5C). These results demonstrate that NMc neurons act as a low-pass filter in response to sinusoidal current injections and fire optimally to stimulation < 40 Hz. It should be noted that burst firing was also observed to near-threshold sinusoidal current injections. Supplementary Figure S1 shows two representative NMc neurons with threshold current of 20 pA (Supplementary Figures S1A1,B1). Both NMc neurons fired bursts of APs to a 5 Hz current injection just above threshold (25 and 50 pA, Supplementary Figures S1A2,B2, respectively).
We further calculated the inter-spike intervals (ISIs) for APs generated in response to sinusoidal current injections. For AP responses to low-frequency stimulations (i.e., 5 and 10 Hz), only the spike intervals within the burst firing of each cycle were calculated (see section “Materials and Methods”). Figure 5D shows the histogram of ISIs for 5 and 75 Hz. The ISI histogram for 75 Hz is multimodal. The first and the largest peak of the histogram corresponds to ISI ∼13 ms, which represents the average interval between two consecutive APs. The second peak corresponds to ISI ∼27 ms, which is approximately twice as large as the ISI for the first peak and represents the average interval of two APs with a failure in between. Following this order, the third and the forth peak (though small) represent the average interval with two and three failures in between, respectively. The ISI histogram for 5 Hz is relatively bimodal, with the first and the largest peak superimposing the first peak of 75 Hz. This indicates that NMc neurons burst fired at ∼75 Hz. The second peak corresponds to ISI ∼22 ms, representing ∼45 Hz. Therefore, in response to 5 Hz sinusoidal current injections, NMc neurons generated burst firing at each cycle in relatively fast frequencies between 45 and 75 Hz.
In a subset of experiments, we recorded the frequency-firing pattern of NMc at near physiological temperature (i.e., 35°C). Burst firing to stimulations of 5 and 10 Hz became more robust at the higher temperature, as demonstrated by two major changes. First, we observed a significant increase in the number of APs per cycle (Figure 5B, left and Figure 5C). Second, the histogram of ISI for burst firing to 5 Hz stimulation peaked at 11–14 ms, corresponding to a more rapid firing rate of 71–91 Hz compared to room temperature (22°C, Figure 5D). In contrast, responses to stimulus frequencies greater than 40 Hz did not show significant differences in the number of APs per cycle (Figure 5B, middle, right and Figure 5C) or firing rate (data not shown). In summary, the number of APs per cycle and ISI at different recording temperatures indicate that NMc neurons are responsive to slow rising depolarization.
This functional phenotype of NMc neurons to sinusoidal inputs is in stark contrast to adendritic NM neurons, which show band-pass filter characteristic of firing pattern (Hong et al., 2016). Adendritic NM neurons do not fire APs to 5 and 10 Hz stimulation. However, this can be reversed and made similar to the firing pattern of NMc neurons with blockade of K+LV A channels in a model NM neuron (Lu et al., 2017). The filtering function of adendritic NM neurons is due to the fast activation of K+LV A channels that shunt the membrane depolarization induced by slow rising stimulation, such as sinusoidal current injection of 5 or 10 Hz (Lu et al., 2017). Additionally, adendritic NM neurons are able to follow 75 Hz stimulation continuously for 1 s in a one-to-one fashion, the firing capability of which can be reduced by blocking K+HV A channels (Hong et al., 2016). Therefore, we conclude that the functional phenotype of NMc neurons is a combinatory result of their reduced K+LV A (for burst firing to low-frequency stimulations) and K+HV A conductances (for filtering out sinusoidal input with frequency > 40 Hz).
Role of KV3- and KV2-Containing Channels in Regulating Low-Frequency Burst Firing for NMc Neurons
NMc neurons burst fired at 45–75 Hz to sinusoidal current injections of 5 Hz, a feature that is not present in adendritic NM neurons (Hong et al., 2016) and may be relevant to processing extremely low frequency information (i.e., infrasound). Therefore, we next characterized the ion channel properties that shape burst firing for NMc neurons. Based on the aforementioned role of KV3- and KV2-containing channels on AP kinetics, we hypothesized that these channels contribute to shaping burst firing in response to 5 Hz sinusoidal current injections. To test this hypothesis, we used TEA (1 mM) and GxTx to block KV3- and KV2-containing channels, respectively. Figures 6A,C show the representative voltage responses to the first cycle of 5 Hz stimulation before and during drug application. APs per cycle and ISIs were calculated under each condition. When bath applying TEA to block KV3-containing channels, we observed a significant reduction in APs per cycle (Figures 6A,B left, p = 0.012, paired t-test). In addition, ISIs increased significantly, indicating a significant slowing in the burst-firing rate (Figures 6A,B right, p = 0.003). Similarly, when bath applying GxTx to block KV2-containing channels, we also observed a significant reduction in APs per cycle (Figures 6C,D left, p = 0.042). However, ISIs did not change (Figures 6C,D right, p = 0.169). This result is likely attributable to two counteractive effects of KV2-containing channels on repetitive firing: first, activation of KV2-containing channels results in profound after hyperpolarization, which facilitates the recovery of NaV channels and thus promotes repetitive firing; second, the slow kinetics of KV2 deactivation prolong the refractory period and thus impede repetitive firing (Johnston et al., 2010; Liu and Bean, 2014). Blockade of KV2-containing channels depolarized the membrane but also likely shortened the refractory period after APs. In summary, KV3-containing channels significantly regulate the bursting APs per cycle and firing rate, while KV2-containing channels only show a significant effect on the bursting APs per cycle. It should be noted that AP reduction in both cases was due to the failure of generating the last AP per cycle, indicating increased membrane depolarization when KV channels are blocked.
In a subset of experiments, we were able to bath apply GxTx and TEA sequentially (n = 6 neurons). As we expected, NMc neurons with blockade of both KV3- and KV2-containing channels showed largely depolarized voltage responses as compared to those in control (Figures 6E,F). However, dual drug application did not abolish burst firing for the majority of NMc neurons (five out of six neurons). To our surprise, NMc neurons were able to fire multiple APs even when membrane voltages were depolarized enough to inactivate most NaV channels (see Figures 4G, 6F). This result suggests that there are other factor(s) that promote the generation of burst firing in NMc neurons, even without profound after hyperpolarization.
Resurgent NaV Current of NMc Neurons
One such factor, as we hypothesized, is the resurgent NaV current (INaR) induced by a specific “open channel block state” that is indigenous to the NaV channel (Grieco et al., 2005). This hypothesis is based on numerous previous studies that showed INaR being the key factor responsible for high-frequency firing and burst generation (Raman and Bean, 2001; Enomoto et al., 2007; Kim et al., 2010). Our recent study reported the presence and important function of INaR in mid- to high-frequency NM neurons (Hong et al., 2017). Therefore, to test our hypothesis, we first examined whether NMc neurons presented with INaR using classic voltage-clamp protocols (Raman and Bean, 1997). NMc neurons were held at -90 mV before application of a depolarizing step to +30 mV for 10 ms. This is referred to as the conditioning step. Next, NMc neurons were repolarized to membrane voltages ranging from -70 to 0 mV (Δ step = 5 mV) in order to elicit INaR (if any). With this protocol, we observed robust generation of INaR in NMc neurons (Figure 7A). The amplitude of INaR was measured and plotted as a function of repolarizing membrane voltage (Figure 7D). The voltage dependence of INaR in NMc neurons displayed a typical “V” shape that peaked at -30 mV, similar to those reported in mammalian neurons (Lewis and Raman, 2014). In addition, the maximal amplitude of INaR in NMc neurons was usually less than 1 nA and much smaller than the amplitude of INaT (see Figures 4D, 7D). This property also closely resembled that observed in other auditory brainstem neurons (Leao R.N. et al., 2006; Kim et al., 2010), including adendritic NM neurons (Hong et al., 2017).
Previous studies show that the amplitude of INaR is dependent on the level of conditioning step (Raman and Bean, 2001). The more positive the conditioning step is (e.g., +30 mV), the more likely to elicit larger INaR. This is because the mechanism of the open channel block state (which is responsible for generating INaR) competes against the classic inactivation mechanism that is induced by the cytoplasmic linker between III and IV domains of NaV channels. More positive voltage steps help condition NaV channels toward an open channel block state (and thus larger INaR). We next examined whether the level-dependence property was also presented in NMc neurons by switching the step depolarization from +30 mV to 0 and -30 mV (duration = 10 ms). We still observed INaR in response to the conditioning step of 0 mV for 10 ms, but the INaR amplitude was generally smaller than using the conditioning step of +30 mV (Figure 7B). However, the INaR current-voltage relationship remained similar despite of different conditioning levels (i.e., both peaked at -30 mV, Figure 7D). Finally, no detectable INaR was observed in NMc neurons when using a more negative conditioning step (i.e., -30 mV, Figure 7C). Instead, large steady-state persistent NaV currents (INaP) were evident following the repolarization. These results further confirmed the similarity of INaR properties between NMc and other neurons reported elsewhere.
With respect to the kinetics of INaR, two variables were calculated (1) time to peak, defined as the amount of time taken from the onset of repolarization to the peak of INaR and (2) decay time constant (tau), calculated by fitting a single exponential to the decay phase of INaR. The conditioning step of +30 mV was used for calculation of INaR kinetics. Both variables were plotted as a function of repolarizing membrane voltage (Figures 7E,F). Similar to mammalian neurons (Lewis and Raman, 2014), both time to peak and decay time constant for NMc neurons increased gradually as the repolarizing membrane voltage became less negative. In summary, our results suggest that INaR is a common feature shared in the avian auditory brainstem, and a highly conserved property across different biological structures and species (Lewis and Raman, 2011).
Nevertheless, when comparing the INaR properties between NMc and adendritic NM neurons, we noticed several differences (Table 1) (Hong et al., 2017). First, the maximal INaR in NMc neurons was significantly smaller and accounted for only ∼60% of the maximal INaR in adendritic NM neurons. Second, the INaR voltage dependence in NMc neurons shifted toward the positive direction by ∼10 mV and peaked at -30 mV, whereas INaR peaked at -40 mV for adendritic NM neurons (Hong et al., 2017). Third, time to peak, which indicates the rate of open channel blocker unbinding from NaV α-subunits, was larger in NMc neurons. This difference further suggests a higher affinity of open channel blocker to α-subunits in NMc neurons than in adendritic NM neurons. Finally, decay time constant (tau) was smaller in NMc neurons. Decay time constant depends on both the unbinding rate of open channel blocker and after the displacement of open channel blocker; the rate of α-subunits entering the classic inactivated or closed state (depending on membrane voltage). For NMc neurons, despite their longer time to displace the open channel blocker, shorter decay time constant suggests that their α-subunits entered the inactivated or closed state significantly faster than those in adendritic NM neurons. This result is consistent with the significantly larger fall rate of INaT in NMc neurons (see Figure 4). In addition, we also measured the amplitude of INaP at the end of 100 ms repolarization for NMc neurons and it was significantly smaller than adendritic neurons. Taken together, our comparisons revealed that INaR properties, including the amplitude, voltage dependence and kinetics, are surprisingly differentiated across tonotopic regions – a result that has not been reported in the auditory system.
Role of INaR in Regulating Burst Firing for NMc Neurons: Experimental Results
We hypothesized that INaR with its underlying open channel blocker plays an important role in regulating burst firing in response to low-frequency stimulation for NMc neurons. Based upon this hypothesis, we predicted that the activation of open channel blocker would promote the NaV channel availability and facilitate recovery from depolarization, which is ultimately important for burst firing at a relatively fast rate of 45–75 Hz. To test this prediction, we applied two voltage-clamp protocols that were previously used in mammalian and adendritic NM neurons (Raman and Bean, 2001; Patel et al., 2015; Hong et al., 2017). In the first protocol, NMc neurons were held at -90 mV before application of a conditioning depolarization to +30 mV for 5 ms (Figure 8A). According to the aforementioned observations (see Figure 7), this conditioning step maximized the occupancy of open channel blocker (referred here as “Open Channel Block State”). Next, the membrane voltage was set at -55 mV in order for NMc neurons to recover (average resting membrane potential = -50 mV without the correction of junction potential) (Wang et al., 2017). The recovery time varied from 2 to 30 ms with a 2 ms increment. Finally, a step depolarization to 0 mV was applied to evoke an INaT. The second protocol was similar except for the conditioning step, which was -30 mV for 40 ms in order to maximize the occupancy of the classic inactivation gate (referred here as “Inactivation State,” Figure 8B). Figures 8A,B show representative INaT with varying amplitudes after the recovery under the two different conditions. In order to determine NaV channel availability, we calculated the normalized ratio, which indicates the amount of available NaV channels after the varying recovery period. To do this, we ran a reference pulse to 0 mV (holding voltage = -90 mV) prior to the implementation of the two protocols described above. The recovered INaT amplitude was normalized to this “reference amplitude” and plotted as a function of the recovery time (Figure 8C). As shown by two different recovery trajectories, the availability of NaV channels in Open Channel Block State became significantly larger than in Inactivation State when recovery time was increased beyond 4 ms. The recovery trajectory was fit with a single exponential in order to obtain a recovery time constant (tau). We found that the Open Channel Block State significantly shortened the recovery time constant and facilitated the recovery of NaV channels (Figure 8D, p = 0.018, paired t-test). These results suggest that INaR may help burst firing for NMc neurons.
Role of INaR in Regulating Burst Firing for NMc Neurons: Computational Results
To further examine the role of INaR in regulating burst firing, we built a computational model for NMc neurons. This model is based on our previous studies (Hong et al., 2017; Lu et al., 2017), with parameters adjusted to match the experimental data obtained from NMc neurons (Tables 2, 3). Figure 9A shows KV current traces of the model NMc neuron in response to membrane voltages from -100 to +20 mV, in steps of 5 mV. The steady-state KV current was measured at the end of each trace and plotted as a function of membrane voltage. As shown in Figure 9B, the KV current-voltage relationship of model NMc neuron matched the experimental data. When we applied voltage-clamp protocol with the conditioning step of +30 mV for 10 ms, model NMc neuron generated INaR during repolarizations with similar amplitude and voltage dependence of the experimental data (Figures 9C,D). The generation of INaR was based on Markovian 13-state NaV-channel model, which sets O->OB (i.e., open channel block) transition as a major exit path from the open state (Khaliq et al., 2003; Magistretti et al., 2006). In order to remove INaR, we set the rate constant 𝜀 of this transition to zero. This modification, however, significantly slowed down the falling phase of INaT (Figure 9E, ‘0-INaR-’ condition, blue trace), because removing one of the major exit paths resulted in the slower speed of channels exiting the open state. Therefore, we next increased the rate constant Oon to 2.15 ms-1 and Ooff to 0.01433 ms-1 to restore the normal decay kinetics of INaT and amplitude of INaP, respectively (Figures 9E,F, ‘0-INaR+’ condition, red trace) (Hong et al., 2017). After these two modifications, INaR was successfully eliminated (Figure 9F). “0-INaR+” condition was used to characterize the spiking activity of model NMc neuron without INaR.
When switching to current-clamp mode, spiking activity of the model NMc neuron (in control) closely resembled the experimental results. The model neuron showed similar repetitive firing pattern to experimental data, in response to sustained current injection (Figures 1A, 9G). Figure 9H shows the NaV current underlying this repetitive firing for the model NMc neuron. Interestingly, our modeling data closely resembled previous reports in cerebellar Purkinje cells, when repetitive APs were used as voltage commands and the underlying NaV currents were recorded in voltage-clamp mode (also referred as ‘AP clamp’) (Raman and Bean, 1997, 1999). This is especially true when we observed an obvious inward-going component immediately after the first AP (Figure 9H, arrowhead and inset, arrow). This small inward current, based on previous AP-clamp studies, is the INaR (Raman and Bean, 1997; Raman et al., 2000; Do and Bean, 2003; Enomoto et al., 2006).
Our model NMc neuron also generated similar frequency responses to sinusoidal current injections. For example, Figure 10A1 shows burst firing of the model neuron to a 5 Hz sinusoidal current injection. The model neuron generated 4 APs per cycle, which is around the average of our experimental data (see Figure 5C). Figures 10A2,A3 show the expansion of voltage responses of the first sinusoidal cycle and the underlying NaV current, respectively. The ISI of burst firing for model neuron was ∼14.8 ms, which is also similar to our experimental results (see Figure 5D). Additionally, we observed small inward-going NaV currents between spikes (Figure 10A3, black arrowhead and inset, arrow), which were probably INaR (see below).
FIGURE 10. INaR and high-voltage activated potassium (K+HV A) channels synergistically promote burst firing for model NMc neuron. (A1–C1) Simulated voltage responses from model NMc neuron to 5 Hz sinusoidal current injections under three different conditions: control (A1), with removal of INaR (‘0-INaR+’, B1) and with removal of both INaR and K+HV A conductances (‘0-INaR+/0-IKHV A’, C1). The strength of sinusoidal current injections is 352 pA. (A2–C2) The expansion of simulated voltage responses to the first cycle of sinusoidal current injections, under three different conditions. The ISI represents the time difference between the first and second APs. (A3–C3) The expansion of simulated NaV currents underlying the burst firing shown in (A2–C2), respectively. Black arrowhead in (A3) points to the generation of INaR between APs. Arrow points to the generation of INaR. White arrowhead in (B3) points to zero INaR. Gray arrowheads in (C3) point to the generation of INaP.
With removal of the INaR (0-INaR+), burst firing of model NMc neuron was reduced to 3 APs per sinusoidal cycle with prolonged ISI of ∼16.1 ms (Figures 10B1,B2). It is worth noting that the small inward-going NaV currents between spikes observed in control were no longer visible in the “0-INaR+” condition (Figure 10B3, white arrowhead), confirming that these currents were indeed the INaR. The reduction in APs was due to NaV channel inactivation that resulted in the failure of generating a final AP per cycle. These results revealed that INaR plays a role in promoting the burst-like firing of APs per stimulus cycle and the overall firing rate of NMc neurons. In addition, we further set K+HV A conductances to zero in “0-INaR+” condition (termed 0-INaR+/0-IKHV A). With removal of both K+HV A and INaR, the model NMc neuron was only able to generate 2 APs per cycle and ISI was further extended to ∼16.6 ms (Figures 10C1,C2). The membrane voltage was largely depolarized due to the lack of KV conductances. In this case, no INaR was able to activate between spikes at the depolarized membrane voltages (Figure 10C3, first gray arrowhead) and thus the model NMc neuron entered depolarization block after firing two APs. This observation is different from the result shown in Figure 6E, where NMc neurons were able to burst fire at largely depolarized membrane voltages, likely due to INaR. It is also worth noting that a relatively large amount of INaP was activated and sustained during depolarization block (Figure 10C3, second gray arrowhead), which suggests that INaP contributed minimally to subsequent AP firing for NMc neurons. Taken together, our computational results demonstrated that INaR and K+HV A channels work synergistically to promote burst firing for NMc neurons in response to low-frequency stimulations.
Distribution of KV and NaV Channels in NMc
To confirm the expression of KV channels in NMc, we performed immunocytochemistry using antibodies recognizing different KV channels. Consistent with a previous study (Parameshwaran et al., 2001) KV3.1b immunoreactivity was identified throughout NM. At the caudal level (Figure 11A), NMc displayed a distinct distribution pattern as comapred to the neighboring NMcm where neurons do not have dendrites (Wang et al., 2017). NMcm was characterized with strong somatic immunostaining while NMc contained primarily neuropil staining (Figures 11B,C). The custom-made anti-KV2.2 antibody recognized a single band in western blot at the molecular weight of approximate 80 kDa (Figure 11G). This antibody revealed somatic staining in both NMc and NMcm with varied levels of neuropil staining (Figures 11D–F).
FIGURE 11. Immunoreactivity of KV3.1b and KV2.2 in NMc. (A–C) Low- and high-magnification images of KV3.1b immunoreactivity in the caudal NM. The dashed line in (A) outlines the border of NMc. (D–F) Low- and high-magnification images of KV2.2 immunoreactivity in the caudal NM. The dashed line in (D) outlines the border of NMc. (G) KV2.2 antibody validation by western blot. NM, nucleus magnocellularis; NMcm, caudomedial NM; NMc, caudolateral NM. Scale bars = 100 μm in (A) (applies to A,D); 10 μm in (B) (applies to B,C,E,F).
Strong NaV1.6 immunoreactivity was observed throughout NM as bright punctate and short segments (Figures 12A,B). As described in our previous study (Hong et al., 2017), NaV1.6 segments were localized in NM axons that can be traced back to the cell bodies. Interestingly, we identified notably larger size of NaV1.6 immunoreactive segments in NMc1, one subregion of NMc (Wang et al., 2017), as compared to the remaining NM (Figures 12C–F). One-way ANOVA analysis confirmed significantly different lengths and diameters of NaV1.6 segments across different NM subregions (Table 4). Multiple comparisons further revealed that the length and diameter of NaV1.6 immunoreactive segments were significantly larger in NMc1 than NMc2 and NMcm as well as the rostral NM (Figures 12G,H and Table 4). These observations likely underlie the aforementioned larger INaT recorded from NMc1 region. We also suggest that the low-frequency NM region previously reported by Kuba and Ohmori (2009) – showing longer NaV1.6 labeled axonal segments – likely represents the NMc1 region.
FIGURE 12. NaV1.6 immunoreactivity in NM. (A,B) Low-magnification images of NaV1.6 immunoreactivity in the caudal NM containing NMcm, NMc1 and NMc2. Sections were counterstained with MAP2 (red channel in B). To visualize MAP2 staining in NM, the image is saturated in surrounding areas with higher intensities of immunoreactivity than NM. Dashed lines outline the border of NMc1. (C–F) High power images with z-projection showing the immunoreactivity of NaV1.6 in the rostral NM (C), NMcm (D), NMc1 (E), and NMc2 (F), respectively. (G,H) Bar charts demonstrating the length (G) and diameter (H) of Nav1.6 stained segments in various NM subregions. NM, nucleus magnocellularis; NMcm, caudomedial NM; NMc1, caudolateral NM subregion 1; NMc2, caudolateral NM subregion 2. Scale bars = 100 μm in (A) (applies to A,B); 10 μm in (C) (applies to C–F). ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001; ns, not significant.
Our results revealed diverse ion channel properties for neurons responsible for encoding low frequency sounds. NMc neurons, which process the lowest sound frequencies for chickens, showed significantly lower amount of KV1 and KV3 currents but more KV2 current than their higher-frequency counterparts. Despite their larger amplitude of INaT, NMc neurons presented with significantly smaller INaR. In line with these findings, immunochemistry showed KV2 immunoreactivity in NMc region and longer NaV1.6-containing segments along the axons of NMc1 neurons. Additionally, NMc neurons were most responsive to low-frequency sinusoidal current injections, burst firing of which was regulated differentially by KV3-, KV2-containing channels along with INaR.
KV Channel Gradient Along Tonotopic Axis Is Conserved Across Species
In auditory brainstem neurons of both mammals and avians, APs generated by neurons in the low-frequency region are presented with wider duration, elevated excitability and lower timing reliability (Fukui and Ohmori, 2004). KV3-containing channels play an important role in shaping AP duration and thus promote firing at high-rates, whereas KV1-containing channels lower excitability, shorten the membrane time constant and reduce AP jitter (Wang et al., 1998; Johnston et al., 2010; Hong et al., 2016). Based on their specialized functions, one would expect that auditory neurons processing low frequencies show reduced level of KV3 and KV1 expression. Indeed, in mammalian MNTB, KV3.1 immunoreactivity is reduced in the low-frequency region (Strumbos et al., 2010). This is also true in NM (Parameshwaran et al., 2001). In our preparation, we observed reduced somatic levels of KV3.1b immunoreactivity in NMc (see Figure 11). Additionally, the level of KV1.1 mRNA is lowest toward the caudal pole of NM (Fukui and Ohmori, 2004). In line with immunochemistry findings, low-frequency MNTB neurons show less KV3 and KV1 currents (Brew and Forsythe, 2005). Here, we report similar results in NM. At positive membrane voltages, the amplitude of KV3 current is ∼1.13 nA for NMc neurons (i.e., 40% of 2.83 nA), while ∼3.18 nA for mid- to high-frequency NM neurons (Table 1). The amplitude of KV1 current is <1 nA compared to ∼3.06 nA in higher-frequency NM regions (Hong et al., 2016).
In contrast to KV3 and KV1, the tonotopic differentiation of other KV subunits is less explored. A previous study in rat MNTB found a gradient of slow-kinetic KV current that is reversed to the known gradients of KV3 and KV1, i.e., larger current toward the low-frequency region (Brew and Forsythe, 2005). A follow-up study confirmed that this KV current is mediated by KV2 subunits (Johnston et al., 2008). The KV2 gradient found in mammalian auditory brainstem is also present in NM. In mid- to high-frequency NM neurons, KV current was nearly reduced to zero when bath applying both DTx and TEA (Kuba et al., 2015; Hong et al., 2016). This differed in NMc neurons where a relatively large amount of KV currents remained (see Figure 1); the majority of which was sensitive to the KV2 channel blocker, GxTx (see Figure 2). In summary, previous and current studies indicate that tonotopic differentiations of KV1, KV2, and KV3 in auditory brainstem are conserved properties across different species.
INaR Properties Are Differentiated Along Tonotopic Axis of NM
INaR has been reported in numerous mammalian neurons, including auditory structures like the calyx of Held and MNTB principle neurons (Lewis and Raman, 2014). Our recent study showed that this current is also present in mid- to high-frequency NM neurons and thus INaR is another property conserved among mammals and birds and across different structures (Hong et al., 2017). However, it was not clear whether INaR properties show a tonotopic gradient. Our results in the current study demonstrated that INaR properties are differentiated along the tonotopic axis of NM. NMc neurons showed significantly smaller INaR with more depolarized voltage dependence (i.e., by ∼10 mV) compared to their higher-frequency counterpart. These differences may underlie distinct INaR function across tonotopic regions. For example, mid- to high-frequency NM neurons are able to repolarize the membrane quickly during high-frequency firing (i.e., up to 200 Hz), due to their large KV conductances (Hong et al., 2017). Therefore, more hyperpolarized INaR voltage dependence in these neurons may be preferential for the maximal activation of INaR. The removal of INaR in the model NM neuron reduced its high-frequency firing (Hong et al., 2017). In contrast, during burst firing of NMc neurons to low-frequency stimulations, the membrane voltage depolarized gradually (see Figures 5, 6). Thus, more depolarized INaR voltage dependence may optimize the activation of INaR. Removal of INaR in the model NMc neuron led to reduction in burst-like firing of APs per sinusoidal cycle and a slower firing rate (see Figure 10). Taken together, tonotopic differentiation of INaR properties likely contributes to different firing activity for neurons processing different sound frequencies.
Distinct INaR properties along tonotopic axis are likely due to different NaV α-subunits and/or β-subunits. However, both NMc and higher-frequency NM neurons showed extensive NaV1.6 expression, which raises the possibility that the auxiliary β-subunits might show different expression along tonotopic axis. This speculation is partially supported by previous findings from heterologous expression system, where the expression of β1-, β2-, and β4-subunits shows different effects on NaV current properties, including INaT, INaR, and INaP (Qu et al., 2001; Aman et al., 2009). Particularly, β4-subunits have been proposed as the open channel blocker that induced INaR in cerebellar Purkinje cells, granule cells and dorsal root ganglion neurons (Grieco et al., 2005; Bant and Raman, 2010; Barbosa et al., 2015). However, the expression of β-subunits has not been characterized in the auditory system, except for a recent finding of β4-subunits in the spiral ganglion neurons of the auditory nerve and calyx of Held at MNTB (Berret et al., 2016; Browne et al., 2017). Future experiments will test this speculation.
Functional Implication of Burst Firing and Underlying Mechanisms for NMc Neurons
The NM neurons receive inputs from auditory nerve and encode temporal information of sound by firing APs that “lock” to a specific phase, referred to as “phase locking.” Previous modeling studies demonstrated that NM neurons with different characteristic frequencies develop distinct strategies to improve or preserve phase locking abilities (Kuba and Ohmori, 2009; Oline et al., 2016; Lu et al., 2017). High-frequency neurons should only receive a small number of inputs (e.g., <3) in order to maintain relatively good phase locking, whereas low-frequency neurons can receive more inputs in order to improve phase locking (Oline et al., 2016). Anatomical evidences support this idea. Mid- to high-frequency NM neurons receive a few endbulb of Held synapses from the auditory nerve, while NMc neurons form numerous bouton synapses on their extensive dendrites (Jhaveri and Morest, 1982a,b; Wang et al., 2017). Regarding the physiology, converging inputs from multiple bouton synapses can reduce AP jitter and thus improve phase locking for NMc neurons. However, the resultant excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) has a significantly slower rise phase due to the summation process (Kuba and Ohmori, 2009). In addition to input convergence, low-frequency NM neurons have larger NMDA receptor (NMDA-R) current compared to mid- and high-frequency NM due to a greater expression of GluN2B-containing receptors (Lu and Trussell, 2007). NMDA-Rs that contain the GluN2B subunit generate excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) with slow kinetics (Sanz-Clemente et al., 2013; Sanchez et al., 2015). Finally, according to behavior experiments, chickens can hear sound frequencies as low as 2 Hz (Hill et al., 2014). These studies indicate that low-frequency NMc neurons are exposed to slow rising stimulus with long wavelengths. However, we acknowledge that our experimental procedures (i.e., sinusoidal stimulation) take into account compromise when attempting to mimic in vivo conditions and caution must be taken when interpreting the data in a biological context. Nonetheless, we propose that using sinusoidal current injection can serve as a valid tool to investigate a neuron’s response to inputs with varying rise rates and wavelengths, and to better understand the underlying mechanisms. This is especially important for studying biophysical properties across tonotopic regions.
The aforementioned slower EPSP and EPSC are problematic for auditory neurons for several reasons. First, slow depolarization can activate a large amount of KV currents, especially K+LV A, which quickly repolarize and shunt the membrane before reaching the threshold for NaV channel activation. Second, slow depolarization can induce closed-state inactivation of NaV channels that further raises the activation threshold. Both situations prevent neurons from firing APs and thus may cause a loss of sound information. To overcome this, NMc neurons develop specialized ion channel properties from mid- to high-frequency NM neurons. First, NMc neurons are presented with significantly lower KV conductances, especially K+LV A current. Although the exact contribution of distinct dendritic morphology and distribution patterns of KV channels to KV conductances require further determination. Second, NMc neurons (mainly NMc1) show larger NaV current with higher channel density in the axons. Significantly larger NaV1.6 immunoreactive segments of NMc1 neurons may serve as one biochemical substrate underlying this larger NaV current. The inactivation curve of NaV channels also shifts toward depolarized direction to minimize closed-state inactivation. These results support the idea that NMc neurons, because of their numerous inputs and dendritic architecture, favor slow rates of depolarization and it is their distinct synaptic and intrinsic ion channel properties that allow them to establish their functional phenotypes that differ from neurons across the tonotopic axis.
Our recent modeling study demonstrated that burst firing to low-frequency sinusoidal current injections would occur as a consequence when K+LV A current was reduced (Lu et al., 2017). Burst firing may be more preferential to encode low-frequency information, though the relationship of our results to that of an in vivo situation remains unclear. However, it is interesting to note that low-pass filter properties of NMc neurons reported here demonstrate some similarity to previous in vivo recordings (Warchol and Dallos, 1989). In their study, Warchol and Dallos (1989) showed that 60% of low-frequency NM neurons displayed tuning curves resembling low-pass filter functions, i.e., lowest threshold observed for sound frequencies from 10 to 50 Hz. How do NMc neurons stay responsive to such low frequencies? Generation of burst firing, as demonstrated in the current study may be one possibility. In addition, due to the long wavelength of low-frequency sound, several studies argued that auditory brainstem neurons might employ distinct strategies to encode interaural time difference (ITD) and to localize low-frequency sound, especially regarding animals with small heads (McAlpine et al., 2001; Carr and Koppl, 2004). For example, the preferential azimuth for individual sound localization neurons in both mammals and birds is identified by the peak slope of their ITD-function response curve (i.e., the most drastic change in the response), instead of their peak response to differences in interaural timing cues. Although it is difficult to relate this idea to the current findings, burst firing may promote the steepness of the response and help optimize low-frequency sound localization abilities. Future studies should be directed at addressing these possibilities. Our results suggest that burst firing and its underlying ion channel mechanisms may reflect a strategy adopted by NMc neurons in order to accurately encode low-frequency sound and may be an evolutionally conserved mechanism that subserves similar auditory-related functions across species.
All authors approved the final version of the manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. All persons designated as authors qualify for authorship, and all those who qualify for authorship are listed. HH, TL, XW, DZ, YW, and JS designed the study. HH performed the electrophysiology experiments at Northwestern University. TL performed the computational modeling experiments at Northwestern University. XW, DZ, and YW performed the immunocytochemical experiments at Florida State University. HH, TL, XW, DZ, YW, and JS analyzed/interpreted data and wrote the manuscript.
This research was supported by the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD) DC013841 (JS) and DC013074 (YW) and the Hugh Knowles Hearing Research Center (JS and YW).
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
We thank Drs. Larry Trussell, Yong Lu, and Tina Grieco-Calub for helpful discussion of the data, experimental design and comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. We also thank Dr. Hiroshi Kuba for generously providing sodium channel antibodies.
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fncel.2018.00175/full#supplementary-material
Aman, T. K., Grieco-Calub, T. M., Chen, C., Rusconi, R., Slat, E. A., Isom, L. L., et al. (2009). Regulation of persistent Na current by interactions between beta subunits of voltage-gated Na channels. J. Neurosci. 29, 2027–2042. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4531-08.2009
Bant, J. S., and Raman, I. M. (2010). Control of transient, resurgent, and persistent current by open-channel block by Na channel beta4 in cultured cerebellar granule neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 12357–12362. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005633107
Barbosa, C., Tan, Z. Y., Wang, R., Xie, W., Strong, J. A., Patel, R. R., et al. (2015). Navbeta4 regulates fast resurgent sodium currents and excitability in sensory neurons. Mol. Pain 11:60. doi: 10.1186/s12990-015-0063-9
Berret, E., Kim, S. E., Lee, S. Y., Kushmerick, C., and Kim, J. H. (2016). Functional and structural properties of ion channels at the nerve terminal depends on compact myelin. J. Physiol. 594, 5593–5609. doi: 10.1113/JP272205
Brew, H. M., and Forsythe, I. D. (2005). Systematic variation of potassium current amplitudes across the tonotopic axis of the rat medial nucleus of the trapezoid body. Hear. Res. 206, 116–132. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.12.012
Browne, L., Smith, K. E., and Jagger, D. J. (2017). Identification of persistent and resurgent sodium currents in spiral ganglion neurons cultured from the mouse cochlea. eNeuro 4:ENEURO.0303-17.2017. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0303-17.2017
Eijkelkamp, N., Linley, J. E., Baker, M. D., Minett, M. S., Cregg, R., Werdehausen, R., et al. (2012). Neurological perspectives on voltage-gated sodium channels. Brain 135, 2585–2612. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws225
Enomoto, A., Han, J. M., Hsiao, C. F., Wu, N., and Chandler, S. H. (2006). Participation of sodium currents in burst generation and control of membrane excitability in mesencephalic trigeminal neurons. J. Neurosci. 26, 3412–3422. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5274-05.2006
Fukui, I., and Ohmori, H. (2004). Tonotopic gradients of membrane and synaptic properties for neurons of the chicken nucleus magnocellularis. J. Neurosci. 24, 7514–7523. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0566-04.2004
Grieco, T. M., Malhotra, J. D., Chen, C., Isom, L. L., and Raman, I. M. (2005). Open-channel block by the cytoplasmic tail of sodium channel beta4 as a mechanism for resurgent sodium current. Neuron 45, 233–244. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.035
Hill, E. M., Koay, G., Heffner, R. S., and Heffner, H. E. (2014). Audiogram of the chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) from 2 Hz to 9 kHz. J. Comp. Physiol. A 200, 863–870. doi: 10.1007/s00359-014-0929-8
Hong, H., Lu, T., Wang, X., Wang, Y., and Sanchez, J. T. (2017). Resurgent sodium current promotes action potential firing in the avian auditory brainstem. J. Physiol. 596, 423–443. doi: 10.1113/JP275083
Hong, H., Rollman, L., Feinstein, B., and Sanchez, J. T. (2016). Developmental profile of ion channel specializations in the avian nucleus magnocellularis. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 10:80. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2016.00080
Howard, M. A., and Rubel, E. W. (2010). Dynamic spike thresholds during synaptic integration preserve and enhance temporal response properties in the avian cochlear nucleus. J. Neurosci. 30, 12063–12074. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1840-10.2010
Jhaveri, S., and Morest, D. K. (1982a). Neuronal architecture in nucleus magnocellularis of the chicken auditory system with observations on nucleus laminaris: a light and electron microscope study. Neuroscience 7, 809–836.
Jhaveri, S., and Morest, D. K. (1982b). Sequential alterations of neuronal architecture in nucleus magnocellularis of the developing chicken: a Golgi study. Neuroscience 7, 837–853. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(82)90046-X
Johnston, J., Forsythe, I. D., and Kopp-Scheinpflug, C. (2010). Going native: voltage-gated potassium channels controlling neuronal excitability. J. Physiol. 588, 3187–3200. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2010.191973
Johnston, J., Griffin, S. J., Baker, C., Skrzypiec, A., Chernova, T., and Forsythe, I. D. (2008). Initial segment Kv2.2 channels mediate a slow delayed rectifier and maintain high frequency action potential firing in medial nucleus of the trapezoid body neurons. J. Physiol. 586, 3493–3509. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.153734
Khaliq, Z. M., Gouwens, N. W., and Raman, I. M. (2003). The contribution of resurgent sodium current to high-frequency firing in Purkinje neurons: an experimental and modeling study. J. Neurosci. 23, 4899–4912. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-12-04899.2003
Kim, J. H., Kushmerick, C., and Von Gersdorff, H. (2010). Presynaptic resurgent Na+ currents sculpt the action potential waveform and increase firing reliability at a CNS nerve terminal. J. Neurosci. 30, 15479–15490. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3982-10.2010
Kimm, T., Khaliq, Z. M., and Bean, B. P. (2015). Differential regulation of action potential shape and burst-frequency firing by BK and Kv2 channels in substantia nigra dopaminergic neurons. J. Neurosci. 35, 16404–16417. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5291-14.2015
Kuba, H., Yamada, R., Fukui, I., and Ohmori, H. (2005). Tonotopic specialization of auditory coincidence detection in nucleus laminaris of the chick. J. Neurosci. 25, 1924–1934. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4428-04.2005
Kuba, H., Yamada, R., Ishiguro, G., and Adachi, R. (2015). Redistribution of Kv1 and Kv7 enhances neuronal excitability during structural axon initial segment plasticity. Nat. Commun. 6:8815. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9815
Leao, K. E., Leao, R. N., Sun, H., Fyffe, R. E., and Walmsley, B. (2006). Hyperpolarization-activated currents are differentially expressed in mice brainstem auditory nuclei. J. Physiol. 576(Pt 3), 849–864. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.114702
Leao, R. N., Sun, H., Svahn, K., Berntson, A., Youssoufian, M., Paolini, A. G., et al. (2006). Topographic organization in the auditory brainstem of juvenile mice is disrupted in congenital deafness. J. Physiol. 571, 563–578. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.098780
Lewis, A. H., and Raman, I. M. (2011). Cross-species conservation of open-channel block by Na channel beta4 peptides reveals structural features required for resurgent Na current. J. Neurosci. 31, 11527–11536. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1428-11.2011
Liu, P. W., and Bean, B. P. (2014). Kv2 channel regulation of action potential repolarization and firing patterns in superior cervical ganglion neurons and hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. J. Neurosci. 34, 4991–5002. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1925-13.2014
Lu, T., Wade, K., Hong, H., and Sanchez, J. T. (2017). Ion channel mechanisms underlying frequency-firing patterns of the avian nucleus magnocellularis: a computational model. Channels 11, 444–458. doi: 10.1080/19336950.2017.1327493
Magistretti, J., Castelli, L., Forti, L., and D’angelo, E. (2006). Kinetic and functional analysis of transient, persistent and resurgent sodium currents in rat cerebellar granule cells in situ: an electrophysiological and modelling study. J. Physiol. 573, 83–106. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.106682
Owen, D. G., Hall, A., Stephens, G., Stow, J., and Robertson, B. (1997). The relative potencies of dendrotoxins as blockers of the cloned voltage-gated K+ channel, mKv1.1 (MK-1), when stably expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Br. J. Pharmacol. 120, 1029–1034. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0701004
Patel, R. R., Barbosa, C., Xiao, Y., and Cummins, T. R. (2015). Human Nav1.6 channels generate larger resurgent currents than human Nav1.1 channels, but the Navbeta4 peptide does not protect either isoform from use-dependent reduction. PLoS One 10:e0133485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133485
Pilati, N., Large, C., Forsythe, I. D., and Hamann, M. (2012). Acoustic over-exposure triggers burst firing in dorsal cochlear nucleus fusiform cells. Hear. Res. 283, 98–106. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.10.008
Qu, Y., Curtis, R., Lawson, D., Gilbride, K., Ge, P., Distefano, P. S., et al. (2001). Differential modulation of sodium channel gating and persistent sodium currents by the beta1, beta2, and beta3 subunits. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 18, 570–580. doi: 10.1006/mcne.2001.1039
Raman, I. M., and Bean, B. P. (1997). Resurgent sodium current and action potential formation in dissociated cerebellar Purkinje neurons. J. Neurosci. 17, 4517–4526. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-12-04517.1997
Raman, I. M., and Bean, B. P. (1999). Ionic currents underlying spontaneous action potentials in isolated cerebellar Purkinje neurons. J. Neurosci. 19, 1663–1674. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-05-01663.1999
Raman, I. M., and Bean, B. P. (2001). Inactivation and recovery of sodium currents in cerebellar Purkinje neurons: evidence for two mechanisms. Biophys. J. 80, 729–737. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)76052-3
Raman, I. M., Gustafson, A. E., and Padgett, D. (2000). Ionic currents and spontaneous firing in neurons isolated from the cerebellar nuclei. J. Neurosci. 20, 9004–9016. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-24-09004.2000
Rothman, J. S., and Manis, P. B. (2003). The roles potassium currents play in regulating the electrical activity of ventral cochlear nucleus neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 89, 3097–3113. doi: 10.1152/jn.00127.2002
Rubel, E. W., and Parks, T. N. (1975). Organization and development of brain stem auditory nuclei of the chicken: tonotopic organization of n. magnocellularis and n. laminaris. J. Comp. Neurol. 164, 411–433. doi: 10.1002/cne.901640403
Sanchez, J. T., Ghelani, S., and Otto-Meyer, S. (2015). From development to disease: diverse functions of NMDA-type glutamate receptors in the lower auditory pathway. Neuroscience 285, 248–259. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.11.027
Strumbos, J. G., Polley, D. B., and Kaczmarek, L. K. (2010). Specific and rapid effects of acoustic stimulation on the tonotopic distribution of Kv3.1b potassium channels in the adult rat. Neuroscience 167, 567–572. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.02.046
Wang, L. Y., Gan, L., Perney, T. M., Schwartz, I., and Kaczmarek, L. K. (1998). Activation of Kv3.1 channels in neuronal spine-like structures may induce local potassium ion depletion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 1882–1887. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.4.1882
Wang, X., Hong, H., Brown, D. H., Sanchez, J. T., and Wang, Y. (2017). Distinct neural properties in the low-frequency region of the chicken cochlear nucleus magnocellularis. eNeuro 4:ENEURO.0016-17.2017. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0016-17.2017
Wang, Y., and Rubel, E. W. (2008). Rapid regulation of microtubule-associated protein 2 in dendrites of nucleus laminaris of the chick following deprivation of afferent activity. Neuroscience 154, 381–389. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.02.032
Keywords: nucleus magnocellularis, potassium channels, sodium channels, action potentials, auditory brainstem, resurgent sodium current, tonotopic map
Citation: Hong H, Wang X, Lu T, Zorio DAR, Wang Y and Sanchez JT (2018) Diverse Intrinsic Properties Shape Functional Phenotype of Low-Frequency Neurons in the Auditory Brainstem. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 12:175. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2018.00175
Received: 31 January 2018; Accepted: 04 June 2018;
Published: 26 June 2018.
Edited by:Arianna Maffei, Stony Brook University, United States
Reviewed by:Ivan Milenkovic, Leipzig University, Germany
Maxim Volgushev, University of Connecticut, United States
Copyright © 2018 Hong, Wang, Lu, Zorio, Wang and Sanchez. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.