Development and Application of Sub-Mitochondrial Targeted Ca2 + Biosensors

Introduction

Embedded between the outer (OMM) and the inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM) the mitochondrial intermembrane space (IMS) including the cristae lumen (CL) represents the smallest mitochondrial sub-compartment. This specialized area is of upmost importance for the regulation of mitochondrial protein import, lipid homeostasis, energy metabolism and metal ion exchange to maintain cellular functions (Frey and Mannella, 2000; Herrmann, 2010; Shoshan-Barmatz et al., 2018). While the OMM is permeable for molecules below 5 kDa via VDAC1 (Camara et al., 2017), the IMM is impermeable. Thus, the transfer of biomolecules across the IMM into the mitochondrial matrix relies on transporters, carriers and exchangers. Among these the mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uptake machinery displays a frequently studied mechanism due to its importance for the regulation of various mitochondrial functions. The molecular nature of the mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uniporter is a complex formation of several interacting proteins located in the IMM including the pore forming subunit mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uniporter (MCU) (Baughman et al., 2011), the essential mitochondrial regulator (EMRE) (Sancak et al., 2013) and the two gatekeeper opponents, the mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uptake 1 and 2 (MICU1 and MICU2) (Kamer and Mootha, 2014). Recently, we and others demonstrated that MICU1 forms multimers and rearranges its oligomeric state as soon as Ca²⁺ enters by binding to the EF hand motifs that are localized toward the IMS (Wang et al., 2014; Waldeck-Weiermair et al., 2015), which in turn regulates MCU/EMRE channel activity. Notably in most non-excitable cells the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) represents the main source of Ca²⁺ to be requested into the mitochondrial matrix. The direct transfer of Ca²⁺ from the ER into the mitochondrial matrix has been studied intensively and was described to be take place in focal contact sites between the two organelles, the mitochondria-associated membranes (MAMs) (van Vliet et al., 2014). The formation of MAMs and as a consequence the transfer of Ca²⁺ from the ER to the mitochondria is crucially dependent on the distance between the two organelles (Szymański et al., 2017). On the other hand, the voltage dependent anion channel 1 (VDAC1) represents the most abundant porin in the OMM accounting for its permeability for cations like Ca²⁺ (Camara et al., 2017). As one of the most studied mitochondrial proteins VDAC1 does not just serve as a non-selective hole, but contributes to numerous Ca²⁺ dependent functions such as Ca²⁺-induced apoptosis (Weisthal et al., 2014), Ca²⁺-modulated energy production (Cárdenas et al., 2010; Shoshan-Barmatz and Mizrachi, 2012), global Ca²⁺ signaling (Berridge et al., 2003) and ER-to-mitochondria Ca²⁺ transport (Szabadkai et al., 2006; Gautier et al., 2016). For the latter it has been suggested that VDAC1 may form supra-molecular complexes that occur at MAMs by the interaction with GRP75 (Szabadkai et al., 2006), mitofusin-2 (Shoshan-Barmatz et al., 2018) and the IP₃ receptor 1 (Szabadkai et al., 2006). Indeed, regulation of mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uptake is especially critical in neurons. On the one hand excessive mitochondrial Ca²⁺ induce cell death by the release of pro-apoptotic proteins like cytochrome C that is mainly harbored within mitochondrial cristae (Cogliati et al., 2016) leading to neurodegenerative pathologies like Parkinson’s disease (PD), Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Huntington’s disease (HD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) (Britti et al., 2018). Although these diseases are commonly based on mitochondrial Ca²⁺ dysfunction, the progression of each depends on its specific molecular mechanism. Accordingly, dysregulation of VDAC1 has been described to induce both, PD and AD, either by altered dopamine homeostasis (Alberio et al., 2014) or mediating amyloid β toxicity (Smilansky et al., 2015). In HD it has been reported that the capacity of Ca²⁺ buffering is impaired (Gellerich et al., 2008) and in ALS it is hypothesized that chronic excitotoxicity induce permanent ER Ca²⁺ depletion leading to mitochondrial Ca²⁺ overload (Grosskreutz et al., 2010). On the other hand regulated mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uptake is a prerequisite for neuronal function and survival (Rugarli and Langer, 2012). Aside from stimulating ATP production, transient increases in mitochondrial Ca²⁺ particularly occur at synapses and regulates neurotransmitter release, synaptic transmission and excitability (Pivovarova and Andrews, 2010) by rapidly clearing Ca²⁺ from the cytosol (MacAskill et al., 2010). For instance, in a recent work it has been demonstrated by simultaneously detecting cytosolic and mitochondrial Ca^{2 +} using targeted genetically encoded indicators, namely cytosolic G-GeCO1 and mitochondrial R-GeCO1, that Ca²⁺ is strongly biased toward mitochondria in axon terminals in zebrafish neurons (Mandal et al., 2018). However, since mitochondrial Ca²⁺ buffering is tightly shaping the spatiotemporal profiles of intracellular Ca²⁺ we herein sought to fill the “missing link” of genetically encoded Ca²⁺ probes between the cytosol and the mitochondrial matrix. In order to develop such tools that allow sub-mitochondrial recordings of respective Ca²⁺ signals as prerequisite in a more detailed investigation of the sub-mitochondrial Ca²⁺ signaling and homeostasis, in the present work we focused on the targeting of already widely used genetically encoded Ca²⁺ sensors (i.e., GeCO1-like Ca²⁺ indicators) to the IMS or the mitochondrial cristae. We identified specific targeting sequences for distinct sub-mitochondrial protein targeting and fused them with single FP-based various GeCO1-like Ca²⁺ indicators (Figure 1A) that even allow simultaneous recordings of the Ca²⁺ signals in two (sub-) compartments and enabled us to take a closer look in the kinetics of Ca²⁺ transfer from the ER to mitochondria.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Differential sub-mitochondrial localization of MICU1^{1– 140}-, CVsue- and ROMO1-mRuby. (A) Illustration of construct design of sub-mitochondrial targeting sequences fused with GeCO1 Ca²⁺ indicators. MICU1^{1– 140} including polybasic domain (PB), full length complex V subunit e and full length mutated reactive oxygen modulator 1 (ROMO1) were C-terminally tagged with red and green GeCO1 Ca²⁺ indicators. Numbers indicates amino acid positions. (B–D) Representative dual-color structural illumination microscopy (SIM) images of HeLa mitochondria stained with inner mitochondrial membrane-(IMM-) label MitoTracker Green (MTG, green, middle images) and expressing mRuby2 (magenta, left images) C-terminally tagged with either MICU1^{1– 140} (B), CVsue (C) or ROMO1 (D). Merged images show co-localization of green MTG and magenta mRuby fluorescence (right images). Sum of line scans within the representative rectangle areas were performed for the green and red fluorescence (right panels). Overlay of normalized fluorescence intensity curves indicates distances in full width at half maximum (FWHM) of sub-mitochondrial targeted mRuby (magenta curves) vs. MTG (green curves). (E) Calculation of differences in FWHM_MTG to FWHM_mRuby was performed by subtracting the distance given by the magenta curve from the green one. Statistical evaluation of ΔFWHM values calculated per mitochondrion; ^∗∗∗P < 0.001. Images were obtained from 5 cells in each of 8 independent experiments on 4 different days (n = 8) for each targeting. (F) Schemes illustrating sub-mitochondrial localization given by the distinct targeting sequences.

Materials and Methods

Materials and Buffers

Chemicals and reagents for solutions and buffers were purchased from Carl Roth (Karlsruhe, Germany). Histamine, monensin, and BHQ were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Vienna, Austria). Nigericin was from Tocris (Abingdon, United Kingdom) and ionomycin from Abcam Biochemicals (Cambridge, United Kingdom). For storage cells were maintained in a buffer (storage buffer) containing (in mM): 2 CaCl₂ 135 NaCl, 5 KCl, 1 MgCl₂, 1 HEPES, 2.6 NaHCO₃, 0.44 KH₂PO₄, 0.34 Na₂HPO₄, 10 D-glucose, 0.1% vitamins, 0.2% essential amino acids, and 1% penicillin/streptomycin pH adjusted with NaOH to 7.4 prior to imaging experiments. Therefore, cells were perfused in a physiological HEPES-buffered solution (2CaNa) composed of (in mM): 2 CaCl₂ 135 NaCl, 5 KCl, 1 MgCl₂, 1 HEPES, 10 D-glucose, pH adjusted with NaOH to 7.4 and stimulated with either BHQ or histamine in either a Ca²⁺ free solution or a nominal Ca²⁺ free solution containing EGTA instead of 2 CaCl₂.

Cell Culture and Transfection

In this study we exclusively used a HeLa cell model that was cultivated at passage >50 on low fluorescence glass cover slips with a diameter of either 15 or 30 mm in DMEM (Sigma-Aldrich, Vienna, Austria) containing 10% FCS (PAA, Pasching, Austria), penicillin (100 U/ml) and streptomycin (100 U/ml) in a humidified incubator (37°C, 5% CO₂/95% air). Cells were transfected in a serum-free medium using 3 μg/ml TransFast^TM Transfection reagent (Promega, Madison, WI, United States) together with 1–2 μg of plasmid(s) and/or 100 nM of the respective siRNA(s) per ml 2 days before experiments.

Plasmid and siRNA Material

The plasmid encoding mutated ROMO1 at positions 15, 27, and 42 from potential ROS modulating cysteines to serines (ROMO1) was synthesized by General Biosystems Inc., (Morrisville, NC, United States) and the vectors encoding for GEMGeCO1, CARGeCO1, and mt-CARGeCO1 were purchased from Addgene (Cambridge, MA, United States) and used as vector templates for the N-terminal insertion via XhoI/BamHI of either MICU1^1–140, CVsue or ROMO1 using the primers as follows: MICU1 forward 5′-CCCTCTAGACTCGAG CATG TTTCGTCTGAACTCACT-3′; MICU1 position 420 reverse 5′- GGTTGGATCC TTCAAGGTGGCAAAATATCGG-3′; CVsue forward 5′-AAACTCGAG CATGGTGCCACCGGTGCAGGT- 3′; CVsue position 206 reverse 5′-CCCGGATCC TTTAATAT GCTGTCATCTTCTGCC-3′; ROMO1 forward 5′-AAATCTAG ACTCGAGCATGCCGGTGGCCGTGGGT-3′ and ROMO1 position 255 reverse 5′-CATAGGATCC CGGATGCCCATCCCA ATGG-3′. For SIM these targeting sequences were subcloned in frame with a C-terminal red fluorescent protein (mRuby). All siRNAs were purchased from Microsynth (Balgach, Switzerland) and their (sense strands, 5′-3′) sequences were: ACACUAGGCACCGAGAUUA (siVDAC1) for silencing hVDAC1 (Arif et al., 2019); GCCAGAGACAGACAAUACU (hMCU-si1) and GGAAAGGGAGCUUAUUGAA (hMCU-si2) for silencing hMCU; GAACUUUGCUGCUCUACUU for silencing hEMRE and UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGU as a scrambled Control siRNA. It should be noted that the siRNAs for the knockdown of hMCU and hEMRE had been already verified and used before in the present HeLa cell type (Waldeck-Weiermair et al., 2015; Gottschalk et al., 2019) and thus a verification of the efficiency due to the siRNA mediated knockdown was only performed for VDAC1 siRNA in this work (Supplementary Figure S6).

Quantitative RT-PCR

Total cellular RNA was isolated from HeLa cells transfected with either siRNA against VDAC1 or the scrambled Control siRNA with the PEQLAB total RNA isolation kit (Peqlab, Erlangen, Germany), followed by reverse transcription to cDNA, performed in a thermal cycler (Peqlab) using the high-capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, United States). The qPCR reaction was set up with the GoTag^® qPCR Master Mix (Promega, Mannheim, Germany) together with gene-specific primers (Invitrogen, Vienna, Austria). Experiments were performed on a LightCycler 480 (Roche Diagnostics, Vienna, Austria). Relative expression of specific genes was normalized to human GAPDH, as a housekeeping gene. Primer sequences were as follows: VDAC1 for: 5′-GGACTGAGTACGGCCTGACGTT-3′, VDAC1 rev: 5′-CAGTCCACGTGCAAGCTGATCT-3′, GAPDH (QuantiTect^® Primer Assay Hs_GAPDH, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).

Ca²⁺ Imaging Experiments

Ca²⁺ imaging was performed on a digital wide field microscope, the iMIC (Till photonics, Gräfelfing, Germany) equipped with a 40× objective (alpha Plan Fluar 40×, Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany) and an ultrafast switching monochromator, the Polychrome V (Till Photonics). Illumination of GEM-GeCO1 targeted sensors was performed at 430 nm excitation and emissions were collected with a dichrotome dual emission filter set (dichroic 535dcxr, CFP emitter 482/18 nm, and YFP emitter 535/3 nm). pH calibration was performed as described previously (Burgstaller et al., 2019) in a Ca²⁺-free or Ca²⁺ containing buffer supplemented with 10 μM ionomycin each to establish Ca²⁺ unbound and Ca²⁺ bound states of targeted GEMGeCO1. CARGeCO1 based Ca²⁺ indicators were excited at 575 nm and emitted at 600 nm. For simultaneous measurements, GEM- and CARGeCO1 targeted sensors were alternately excited for 400 ms each at 430 and 575 nm. Emissions derived from both sensors were taken in 3 s interval. Alternatively, we used an ultrafast switching mode where both Ca²⁺ indicators were excited for 150 ms in a 310 ms interval. During the measurements cells were continuously perfused by using a gravity-based perfusion system (NGFI, Graz, Austria) and images were recorded with a charged-coupled device (CCD) camera (AVT Stingray F-145B, Allied Vision Technologies, Stadtroda, Germany). Data acquisition and control of the digital fluorescence microscope was performed using the live acquisition software version 2.0.0.12 (Till Photonics).

Super-Resolution Structured Illumination Microscopy (SIM)

Structured Illumination Microscopy experiments were performed as described previously (Gottschalk et al., 2018). In brief, transfected HeLa cells either expressing MICU1^1–140-mRuby, CVsue-mRuby or ROMO1-mRuby were loaded with 0.5 μM MitoTracker^TM Green (MTG, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA United States) in storage buffer for 40 min, once washed and imaged in 2CaNa with a super-resolution CFI SR Apochromat TIRF 100x-oil (NA 1.49) objective mounted on a Nikon-Structured Illumination Microscopy (N-SIM^®) System with standard wide field and SIM filter sets and equipped with two Andor iXon3^® EMCCD camera mounted to a Two Camera Imaging Adapter (Nikon Austria, Vienna, Austria). Co-localization of MTG fluorescence intensities with MICU1^1–140-mRuby, CVsue-mRuby and ROMO1-mRuby in the CM and IBM were measured via line scan analysis within a defined rectangle area. Normalized sum of intensities profiles derived from green (MTG) and red (mRuby) fluorescence were calculated to define the full width at half maximum (FWHM) as a measurement for the label latitude. MTG-staining was used as an internal reference for the IMM to determine the distance variation of sub-mitochondrial targeted mRuby at basis of the FWHM.

Statistical Analysis of Data

Statistical analysis for SIM experiments were performed using one way ANOVA and Bonferroni’s post hoc test. The acquired data of Ca²⁺ measurements were analyzed by the GraphPad Prism software version 5.01 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, United States). Data are presented as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM) of independent experiments (n) throughout the whole manuscript. For comparisons between two groups, two-tailed Student t-test was used for evaluation of statistical significance and a P value between 0.01 and 0.05 (p Student’s t-test) was considered significant and indicated with “^∗”, P between 0.001 and 0.01 as very significant with “^∗∗,” and P < 0.001 as highly significant with “^∗∗∗.” For comparisons across multiple groups, one-way ANOVA with Bartlett’s test for equal variances and Bonferroni’s Multiple Comparison test were used for evaluating statistical significance expressed as described above.

Results

Development of Sub-Mitochondrial Targeted Ca²⁺ Biosensors

We and others have predicted that the mitochondrial calcium uptake 1 protein (MICU1) is a specific IMS protein via its N-terminal targeting sequence (Petrungaro et al., 2015; Waldeck-Weiermair et al., 2015). Accordingly, we generated a potentially IMS-targeted mRuby variant using the first 140 amino acids that includes the polybasic region of MICU1, but none of the two EF-hand motifs or the multimerization sites. HeLa cells expressing MICU1^1–140-mRuby were subsequently loaded with the IMM specific dye MitoTracker^TM Green (MTG). Super-resolution structure illumination microscopy (SIM) revealed that MICU1^1–140-mRuby was exclusively directed to the inner boundary membrane (IBM) (Figures 1B,E and Supplementary Figure S1A). For targeting the sensor into the CL, we utilized a recently identified protein referred to as reactive oxygen species modulator 1 (ROMO1) that acts especially in the CL (Norton et al., 2014; Cogliati et al., 2016). Moreover, we used the subunit e of complex V (CVsue) that has been already shown to target within the CL (Rieger et al., 2014; Figures 1C,E and Supplementary Figure S1A) to structurally and functionally verify the targeting of ROMO1. In its size ROMO1 is comparable with CVsue and is also anchored with only one transmembrane domain into the cristae membrane. To disable ROMO1’s function as ROS modulator while preserving its feature as a targeting peptide we mutated all four ROS sensitive cysteine residues to rather ROS-inert serine residues at the amino acid positions 15, 27, 42, and 79. Fusion of ROMO1 to the N-terminus of an mRuby yielded predominantly CL localization that was comparable to that of CVsue targeting as revealed via SIM (Figures 1D,E and Supplementary Figure S1A). SIM data were randomly recorded under all conditions and line plot analyses were performed showing no influence of ROMO1-, CVsue- or MICU1^1–140-mRuby expression on mitochondrial thickness (Supplementary Figures S1B,C). Using these newly identified targeting sequences MICU1^1–140, CVsue, and ROMO1 we generated differentially targeted green and red GeCO1 biosensors aiming to visualize Ca²⁺ within the IMS or CL compartments (Figures 1A,F).

Testing the Functionality of the Sub-Mitochondrially Targeted Ca²⁺ Biosensors

We generated two groups of differentially targeted Ca²⁺ biosensors including the ratiometric GEMGeCO1 (Zhao et al., 2011) or intensiometric CARGeCO1 (Wu et al., 2013; Supplementary Table S1). For imaging of the ratiometric GEMGeCO1 we used a standard CFP/YFP emission filter. Recording the single fluorescence intensities of the localized sensor constantly revealed a 5-fold higher signals in the YFP channel compared to the CFP emission at basal Ca²⁺ levels (Figures 2A,C,E). Analyses of all three sub-mitochondrial constructs resulted in comparable ratio signals under resting conditions (Figures 2B,D,F,G). However, the signals upon IP₃-mediated Ca²⁺ mobilization by histamine (100 μM) was more than 50% higher by using the IMS specific MICU1^1–140-GEMGeGO1 in comparison to both CL targeted probes (Figure 2H). Although the two Ca²⁺ indicators within the CL, CVsue-GEMGeCO1 and ROMO1-GEMGeCO1, performed almost identical, the expression level of the ROMO1 targeted probe was significantly higher enabling a better resolution of signals (Figure 2I). Moreover, testing pH sensitivity of MICU1^1–140 or ROMO1 localized GEMGeCO1 revealed relative pH insensitivity of the probes at neutral and higher pH as previously reported for the recombinant GEMGeCO1 protein (Zhao et al., 2011; Supplementary Figure S2). We also constructed the corresponding sub-mitochondrial targeted intensiometric red CARGeCO1 variant which displays a low fluorescent signal under resting conditions and greatly lights up in the presence of Ca²⁺. According to the low expression level together with the low fluorescence intensity of a CVsue-CARGeCO1 indicator we assumed that this probe is hardly detectable at basal Ca²⁺ levels and thus, visualization of CL localized CAR-GeCO1 was only performed by using the ROMO1 targeting sequence. In line with the results obtained by the ratiometric GEMGeCO1, statistical analyses of IMS or CL targeted CARGeCO1 derived signals resulted in comparable histamine responses indicating to distinct sub-mitochondrial Ca²⁺ concentrations upon Ca²⁺ mobilization with an IP₃ generating agonist (Supplementary Figure S3).

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Dynamics of sub-mitochondrial targeted GeCO1-like Ca²⁺ indicators. Single fluorescence intensities over time of MICU1^{1– 140}-GEMGeCO1 (A), CVsue-GEMGeCO1 (C) and ROMO1-GEMGeCO1 (E) in HeLa cells excited at 430 and 480 nm (blue curve) and 535 nm (yellow curve) emission upon stimulation with 100 μM histamine in a nominal Ca²⁺ free buffer. Calculated ratio (green curves) from the respective left panels by the division of F₄₈₀ by F₅₃₅, representing Ca²⁺ concentration levels ([Ca²⁺]) in the IMS (B) and the CL (D,F). (G–I) Statistical analysis of HeLa cells expressing either MICU1^{1– 140}-GEMGeCO1 (dark green, n = 17), CVsue-GEMGeCO1 (aqua green, n = 16) or ROMO1-GEM-GeCO1 (light green, n = 15) and evaluation of ratiometric signals at basal levels (G) in response to histamine treatment (H) and intensiometric basal intensities at 535 nm reflecting sensor expression levels (I). ^∗∗∗P < 0.001 of CVsue-GEMGeCO1 and ROMO1-GEMGeCO1 vs. MICU1^{1– 140}-GEMGeCO1 and ^#P < 0.05 of ROMO1-GEMGeCO1 vs. CVsue-GEMGeCO1.

Multi-Chromatic Imaging of Sub-Mitochondrial Ca²⁺ Responses

The distinct spectral properties of the green and red GeCO1 biosensors allow simultaneous Ca²⁺ recordings in two distinct (sub-)compartments. First, we tested the suitability of the biosensors for simultaneous measurements by co-expressing MICU1^1–140-GEMGeCO1 with MICU1^1–140-CARGeCO1 and alternately recorded the respective emission. Since both biosensors exhibit a similar k_D for Ca²⁺, i.e., 340 nM for GEMGeCO1 (Zhao et al., 2011) and 490 nM for CARGeCO1 (Wu et al., 2013), simultaneous measurements resulted in almost analog Ca²⁺ traces in both channels even at randomly occurring oscillatory Ca²⁺ spikes in one given HeLa cell (Supplementary Figure S4). These results demonstrate that both, the red and green biosensor retain their full functionality even in sub-mitochondrial regions and further demonstrate the suitability of these constructs to image Ca²⁺ in a multi-chromatic manner. Accordingly, we co-expressed each sub-mitochondrial targeted GEM-GeCO1 with either the cytosolic- (CARGeCO1) or the mitochondrial matrix-targeted (mt-CARGeCO1) red Ca²⁺ biosensor and imaged the responses upon histamine stimulation and store-operated Ca²⁺ entry within individual cells. Targeting of the various sensors is illustrated in Figure 3A and the respective sub-mitochondrial Ca²⁺ measurements simultaneously with cytosolic Ca²⁺ signals (CARGeCO1) are presented in Figures 3B,D,F. Furthermore, simultaneous measurements of the mitochondrial matrix Ca²⁺ with the newly targeted Ca²⁺ sensors for the IMS, and for both CL probes were shown in Figures 3C,E,G. Notably, the various sensors exhibited a distinct kinetics that further reflecting the individual Ca²⁺ signaling of the very sub-compartment of the mitochondria. Hence, co-imaging of IMS with cytosolic Ca²⁺ in a fast temporal sampling mode revealed almost simultaneous occurring Ca²⁺ increase (Supplementary Figures S5A,B), while mitochondrial matrix Ca²⁺ was clearly delayed upon histamine stimulation (Supplementary Figures S5C,D).

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. Simultaneous measurements of the sub-mitochondrial Ca²⁺ sensors with the cytosol and mitochondrial matrix. (A) Scheme representing targeting of MICU1^{1– 140}-GEMGeCO1, CVsue-GEMGeCO1, and ROMO1-GEMGeCO1 Ca²⁺ indicators within specific sub-mitochondrial regions. Dark gray region indicates intermembrane space (IMS) and light gray area the cristae lumen (CL). Simultaneous Ca²⁺ imaging of MICU1^{1– 140}-GEMGeCO1 (B,C), CVsue-GEMGeCO1 (D,E) and ROMO1-GEMGeCO1 (F,G) (green curves) with either CARGeCO1 (blue curve; B,D,F) or mt-CARGeCO1 (red curve; (C,E,G) co-expressing single HeLa cells treated with 100 μM histamine in the absence of extracellular Ca²⁺ and upon subsequent store-operated Ca²⁺ entry. Simultaneous measurements allow kinetical comparisons of the Ca²⁺ signals in the various (sub-)compartments.

Knockdown of MCU/EMRE Augments the Ca²⁺ Accumulation Within the Mitochondrial Cristae

To verify the effect of an inhibition of mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uptake on the IMS and CL Ca²⁺ signals, the expression of MCU and its positive key regulator EMRE (Baradaran et al., 2018) were reduced by transfection with the respective siRNAs. Knockdown of MCU and EMRE resulted in an effective decrease of mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uptake upon intracellular Ca²⁺ mobilization (Figure 4A), while the respective Ca²⁺ signal in the IMS remained unaffected (Figure 4B). However, ablation of MCU and EMRE yielded enhanced Ca²⁺ signals in the CL measured with CVsue-GEMGeCO1 (Figure 4C) as well as with ROMO1-GEMGeCO1 (Figure 4D) upon stimulation with histamine. These results point to a specific Ca²⁺ accumulation that occurs especially within the CL under conditions where mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uptake is prevented by the knockdown of MCU/EMRE (Figure 4E).

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. Mitochondrial (sub-)compartmental Ca²⁺ signaling upon knockdown of the pore-forming units of the mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uniporter complex, MCU and EMRE. HeLa cells were co-transfected with GeCO1 Ca²⁺ sensors either targeted in the mitochondrial matrix (A), the IMS and (B) the CL targeted with either CVsue (C) or ROMO1 (D), and specific siRNAs against EMRE and MCU (siEMRE siMCU, orange curves and bars) or scrambled control siRNAs (Control, black curves, and white bars). Cells were stimulated with 100 μM histamine in the absence of extracellular Ca²⁺. (A) Average mitochondrial Ca²⁺ signals over time measured with mt-CARGeCO1 (left panel) and statistical evaluation (right panel) of maximal Δ intensities upon siEMRE siMCU (n = 7) vs. Control (n = 8). (B) Average [Ca²⁺]_IMS curves of IMS-GEMGeCO1 expressing cells (left panel) and bars (right panel) representing maximal Δ ratios in Control (n = 9) and siEMRE siMCU (n = 8). (C) Average Ca²⁺ signals within the CL recorded from CVsue-GEMGeCO1 expressing HeLa cells (left panel) and statistical analysis (right panel) of Control (n = 9) in comparison to siEMRE siMCU (n = 9). (D) Average [Ca²⁺]_CL traces of ROMO1-GEMGeCO1 expressing cells (left panel) and bars (right panel) representing maximal ratiometric fluorescence changes for Control (n = 11) and siEMRE siMCU (n = 10). ^∗∗∗P < 0.001 vs. Control. (E) Illustration of cristae localized Ca²⁺ indicators (ROMO1-GEMGeCO1 or CVsue-GEMGeCO1) sensing Ca²⁺ upon IP₃-mediated Ca²⁺ mobilization within the cristae lumen under control (left panel) or under ablation of mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uptake proteins (siEMRE siMCU, right panel).

Knockdown of VDAC1 Impedes the Ca²⁺ Transfer Through the OMM

Several studies have shown that VDAC1 serves as a gate for Ca²⁺ ions within the OMM (De Stefani et al., 2011). Hence, we performed siRNA mediated knockdown of VDAC1 that was validated on the mRNA level by qRT-PCR (Supplementary Figure S6). To monitor the Ca²⁺ transfer through the OMM we used the IMS targeted MICU1^1–140-GEM-GeCO1 in comparison with cytosolic CARGeCO1 or mt-CARGeCO1 and established a protocol where we exposed the biosensors to either slow/low or fast/high ER Ca²⁺ release and store operated Ca²⁺ entry by the re-addition of extracellular Ca²⁺ after excessive ER store depletion. Notably, in comparison to the IP₃-mediated ER Ca²⁺ release the SERCA inhibitor BHQ mediates a lower Ca²⁺ rise in the cytosol (Figure 5A) and the IMS (Figure 5B) that is marginally entering the mitochondrial matrix (Figure 5C). Knockdown of VDAC1 did not affect [Ca²⁺]_Cyto (Figure 5A). In contrast, depletion of VDAC1 resulted in a reduced Ca²⁺ elevation in the IMS (Figure 5B) and, much more pronounced, in the mitochondrial matrix (Figure 5C) under all conditions of cytosolic Ca²⁺ elevations.

FIGURE 5

Figure 5. Mitochondrial (sub-)compartmental Ca²⁺ signaling upon knockdown of VDAC1 that controls the Ca²⁺ transfer through the outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM). HeLa cells were treated with either a siRNA against VDAC1 (siVDAC1, blue curves and bars) or a scrambled Control siRNA (Control, black curves and white bars) and Ca²⁺ imaging (A–C) was performed over time by consecutively application of 15 μM BHQ and 100 μM histamine in the absence of extracellular Ca²⁺ following a readdition of extracellular Ca²⁺ to highlight store-operated Ca²⁺ entry. (A) Average cytosolic Ca²⁺ curves (left panel) and statistical analysis for Control (n = 11) and for siVDAC1 (n = 11) of maximal Ca²⁺ elevations during treatment with either 15 μM BHQ, 100 μM histamine or re-addition of 2 mM Ca²⁺ (SOCE) (right panel). (B) Average curves of [Ca²⁺]_IMS (left panel) and statistical evaluation of maximal Δ ratio signals (right panel) for Control (n = 19) versus siVDAC1 (n = 19). (C) Average curves reflecting mitochondrial Ca²⁺ signals (left panel) and bar graph (right panel) showing maximal normalized Δ intensities for Control (n = 17) and siVDAC1 (n = 10). ^∗∗P < 0.01 and ^∗∗∗P < 0.001 vs. Control.

Discussion

In this study we identified specific sequences that allow the distinct targeting of genetically encoded Ca²⁺ sensors for (simultaneous) sub-mitochondrial Ca²⁺ measurements. We aimed to establish such biosensors for sub-mitochondrial Ca²⁺ measurements in order to allow the examination of spatial, sub-organellar Ca²⁺ kinetics that will foster our attempts in investigating mitochondrial Ca²⁺ homeostasis. Besides the identification of suitable signal sequences, targeting was assessed using super-resolution structural-illumination microscopy (SIM), and a comparative characterization of the very Ca²⁺ sensitivity was performed. Hence, our work also provides initial (simultaneous) measurements where we applied the new sub-mitochondrial Ca²⁺ sensors for analyses of the Ca²⁺ kinetics upon given intracellular Ca²⁺ signals and, thus, tested the suitability of these new Ca²⁺ sensors to reveal distinct sub-mitochondrial Ca²⁺ signals under various conditions of altered mitochondrial Ca²⁺ signaling.

So far, only few attempts to target fluorescent indicators to these very sub-mitochondrial regions were successful. In an early study, the cDNA of glycerolphosphate dehydrogenase (GPD) was fused to HA1-tagged aequorin to study [Ca²⁺]_IMS (Pinton et al., 1998) or [H⁺]_IMS (Porcelli et al., 2005), but at that time the authors did not determine the exact sub-mitochondrial localization. In a more recent work specific IMS- or CL-targeted pH sensors were introduced and employed on the investigation of mitoflashes within various mitochondrial regions (Rosselin et al., 2017). However, in the present work we seek for signaling sequences from proteins that are directly involved in Ca²⁺ ion signaling and of those the localization has been previously undoubtfully proven. We pictured the localization sequence of MICU1 as very promising approach as it not only includes the important polybasic region between the amino acids 99 to 110. By fusing either the ratiometric green GEMGeCO1 (Zhao et al., 2011) or the intensiometric red CARGeCO1 (Wu et al., 2013) with the C-terminal side of amino acids 1 to 140 from MICU1 we achieved an excellent targeting of the probes exclusively in the IMS but not the CL or mitochondrial matrix. Our approach for targeting Ca²⁺ sensors exclusively into the cristae was successful when using the recently identified proteins referred to as complex V subunit e (CVsue) and reactive oxygen species modulator 1 (ROMO1) that has been shown to localize exclusively in the CL (Norton et al., 2014; Rieger et al., 2014; Cogliati et al., 2016). Our findings show that displacing the ROS-sensitive cysteines of ROMO1 to serines at positions 15, 27, 42, and 79, and C-terminal fusion with the N-terminus of the Ca²⁺ sensors did not affect the proteins distinct CL localization, thus, this approach successfully provided us a strategy to localize (Ca²⁺) sensors exclusively to the CL.

In course of the functional testing of the newly targeted GEMGeCO1 Ca²⁺ sensors the ratiometric behavior upon changes in spatial Ca²⁺ was verified for all localizations. However, the ratio amplitude within the IMS was found to be approximately 1.5-fold higher than that obtained in the CL. One explanation for such reduced amplitude would be either a reduced Ca²⁺ accumulation within the CL. Alternatively, the fluorescence dynamic of GEMGeCO1 might be most likely reduced in the CL because of the acidic environment (Rosselin et al., 2017). By combining distinctively targeted ratiometric green fluorescent ratiometric GEMGeCO1 (Zhao et al., 2011) with differently targeted red intensiometric CARGeCO1 (Wu et al., 2013) we established simultaneous measurements of the Ca²⁺ signals of two distinct sub-mitochondrial compartments. The kinetical analysis of the various Ca²⁺ signals upon intracellular Ca²⁺ release revealed a tight and almost instant coupling between the cytosol and the intermembrane space, thus, indicating that Ca²⁺ transfer through the OMM is very rapid and does not represent a speed-limiting process. Such process is known for the mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uniporter complex that is essentially activated upon Ca²⁺-triggered rearrangement of MICU1 that also requires rather high Ca²⁺ concentrations (>4 μM) to get initiated (Waldeck-Weiermair et al., 2015). However, the kinetics of mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uptake complex (MCUC) is much lower than that in any other mitochondrial sub-compartment, thus indicated some further processes necessary for MCUC activation. This assumption is further supported by the findings that upon a slow Ca²⁺ release by SERCA inhibition or when Ca²⁺ flux through the OMM is reduced by knockdown of VDAC1, no or only very small matrix Ca²⁺ signals occur despite the Ca²⁺ signals in the IMS is much less affected. Our findings that the prevention of MCUC by knockdown of MCU and EMRE did not affect the Ca²⁺ signal in the intermembrane space but considerable increased Ca²⁺ accumulation in the CL point to an active contribution of the cristae to mitochondrial Ca²⁺ homeostasis.

Altogether, in the present work we have successfully targeted well-known Ca²⁺ sensors to sub-compartments of the mitochondria and established simultaneous measurements of two distinct locations. Hence, the newly targeted Ca²⁺ sensors described herein have been approved to be suitable for analyses of sub-mitochondrial Ca²⁺ signaling and mitochondrial Ca²⁺ homeostasis, thus, providing suitable tools to discriminate between malfunction of OMM and/or IMM Ca²⁺ import e.g., during generation of neurodegenerative disease and will foster our understanding on mitochondrial Ca²⁺ homeostasis in future work.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this manuscript will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation, to any qualified researcher.

Author Contributions

JR-M, MD, CK, EE, HB, SB, and MW-W performed design and construction of sensors. JR-M, CK, and MW-W performed cloning and delivered plasmid material. MW-W and GZ performed imaging experiments and data analysis. CM-S performed qRT-PCR experiments including analysis. BG performed super-resolution SIM experiments and analysis. MW-W together with RM, BG, and WG supervised the project, performed data interpretation and wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript at all stages.

Funding

This work was funded by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF), DKplus W1226-B18 and P28529-B27. JR-M, SB, HB, and MD are doctoral fellows within the doctoral program Molecular Medicine (MolMed) at the Medical University of Graz. BG was supported by Nikon Austria and he as well as GZ and CK are doctoral fellows within the doctoral program Metabolic and Cardiovascular Disease (MCD) (FWF, DKplus W1226-B18) at the Medical University of Graz. Microscopic equipment is part of the Nikon-Center of Excellence, Graz that is supported by the Austrian infrastructure program (HRSM 2013/2014), Nikon Austria Inc., and BioTechMed. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Anna Schreilechner BSc. for her excellent technical assistance and the scientific advisory board of Next Generation Fluorescence Imaging (NGFI) GmbH (https://www.ngfi.eu/), a spin-off company of the Medical University of Graz.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fncel.2019.00449/full#supplementary-material

References

Alberio, T., Mammucari, C., D’Agostino, G., Rizzuto, R., and Fasano, M. (2014). Altered dopamine homeostasis differentially affects mitochondrial voltage-dependent anion channels turnover. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 1842, 1816–1822. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2014.06.033

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Arif, T., Amsalem, Z., and Shoshan-Barmatz, V. (2019). Metabolic reprograming via silencing of mitochondrial VDAC1 expression encourages differentiation of cancer cells. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 17, 24–37. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2019.05.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Baradaran, R., Wang, C., Siliciano, A. F., and Long, S. B. (2018). Cryo-EM structures of fungal and metazoan mitochondrial calcium uniporters. Nature 559, 580–584. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0331-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Baughman, J. M., Perocchi, F., Girgis, H. S., Plovanich, M., Belcher-Timme, C. A., Sancak, Y., et al. (2011). Integrative genomics identifies MCU as an essential component of the mitochondrial calcium uniporter. Nature 476, 341–345. doi: 10.1038/nature10234

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Berridge, M. J., Bootman, M. D., and Roderick, H. L. (2003). Calcium signalling: dynamics, homeostasis and remodelling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 517–529. doi: 10.1038/nrm1155

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Britti, E., Delaspre, F., Tamarit, J., and Ros, J. (2018). Mitochondrial calcium signalling and neurodegenerative diseases. Neuronal Signal. 2:NS20180061. doi: 10.1042/ns20180061

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Burgstaller, S., Bischof, H., Gensch, T., Stryeck, S., Gottschalk, B., Ramadani-Muja, J., et al. (2019). pH-Lemon, a fluorescent protein-based pH reporter for acidic compartments. ACS Sensors 4, 883–891. doi: 10.1021/acssensors.8b01599

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Camara, A. K. S., Zhou, Y. F., Wen, P. C., Tajkhorshid, E., and Kwok, W. M. (2017). Mitochondrial VDAC1: a key gatekeeper as potential therapeutic target. Front. Physiol. 8:460. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00460

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cárdenas, C., Miller, R. A., Smith, I., Bui, T., Molgó, J., Müller, M., et al. (2010). Essential regulation of cell bioenergetics by constitutive InsP3Receptor Ca²⁺transfer to mitochondria. Cell 142, 270–283. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.06.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cogliati, S., Enriquez, J. A., and Scorrano, L. (2016). Mitochondrial cristae: where beauty meets functionality. Trends Biochem. Sci. 41, 261–273. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2016.01.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

De Stefani, D., Bononi, A., Romagnoli, A., Messina, A., Pinto, V. De, et al. (2011). VDAC1 selectively transfers apoptotic Ca 2 þ signals to mitochondria. Cell Death Differ. 19, 267–273. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2011.92

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Frey, T. G., and Mannella, C. A. (2000). The internal structure of mitochondria. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25, 319–324. doi: 10.1016/S0968-0004(00)01609-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gautier, C. A., Erpapazoglou, Z., Mouton-Liger, F., Muriel, M. P., Cormier, F., Bigou, S., et al. (2016). The endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondria interface is perturbed in PARK2 knockout mice and patients with PARK2 mutations. Hum. Mol. Genet. 25, 2972–2984. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddw148

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gellerich, F. N., Gizatullina, Z., Nguyen, H. P., Trumbeckaite, S., Vielhaber, S., Seppet, E., et al. (2008). Impaired regulation of brain mitochondria by extramitochondrial Ca²⁺ in transgenic huntington disease rats. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 30715–30724. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M709555200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gottschalk, B., Klec, C., Leitinger, G., Bernhart, E., Rost, R., Madreiter-sokolowski, C., et al. (2019). MICU1 controls cristae junction and spatially anchors mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uniporter complex. Nat. Commun. 10:3732. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11692-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gottschalk, B., Klec, C., Waldeck-Weiermair, M., Malli, R., and Graier, W. F. (2018). Intracellular Ca²⁺ release decelerates mitochondrial cristae dynamics within the junctions to the endoplasmic reticulum. Pflugers Arch. 470, 1193–1203. doi: 10.1007/s00424-018-2133-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Grosskreutz, J., Van Den Bosch, L., and Keller, B. U. (2010). Calcium dysregulation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Cell Calcium 47, 165–174. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2009.12.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Herrmann, J. M. (2010). Ups delivery to the intermembrane space of mitochondria: a novel affinity-driven protein import pathway. EMBO J. 29, 2859–2860. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2010.189

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kamer, K. J., and Mootha, V. K. (2014). MICU1 and MICU2 play nonredundant roles in the regulation of the mitochondrial calcium uniporter. EMBO Rep. 15, 299–307. doi: 10.1002/embr.201337946

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

MacAskill, A. F., Atkin, T. A., and Kittler, J. T. (2010). Mitochondrial tracking and the provision of energy and calcium buffering at excitatory synapses. Eur. J. Neurosci. 32, 231–240. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07345.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mandal, A., Pinter, K., and Drerup, C. M. (2018). Analyzing neuronal mitochondria in vivo using fluorescent reporters in Zebrafish. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 6:144. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2018.00144

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Norton, M., Ng, A. C. H., Baird, S., Dumoulin, A., Shutt, T., Mah, N., et al. (2014). ROMO1 is an essential redox-dependent regulator of mitochondrial dynamics. Sci. Signal. 7:ra10. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2004374

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Petrungaro, C., Zimmermann, K. M., Küttner, V., Fischer, M., Dengjel, J., Bogeski, I., et al. (2015). The Ca²⁺-dependent release of the Mia40-Induced MICU1-MICU2 dimer from MCU regulates mitochondrial Ca²⁺ uptake. Cell Metab. 22, 721–733. doi: 10.1016/J.CMET.2015.08.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pinton, P., Brini, M., Bastianutto, C., Tuft, R. A., Pozzan, T., and Rizzuto, R. (1998). New light on mitochondrial calcium. Biofactors 8, 243–253. doi: 10.1002/biof.5520080312

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pivovarova, N. B., and Andrews, S. B. (2010). Calcium-dependent mitochondrial function and dysfunction in neurons. FEBS J. 277, 3622–3636. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07754.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Porcelli, A. M., Ghelli, A., Zanna, C., Pinton, P., Rizzuto, R., and Rugolo, M. (2005). pH difference across the outer mitochondrial membrane measured with a green fluorescent protein mutant. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 326, 799–804. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.11.105

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rieger, B., Junge, W., and Busch, K. B. (2014). Lateral pH gradient between OXPHOS complex IV and F(0)F(1) ATP-synthase in folded mitochondrial membranes. Nat. Commun. 5:3103. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4103

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rosselin, M., Santo-Domingo, J., Bermont, F., Giacomello, M., and Demaurex, N. (2017). L-OPA1 regulates mitoflash biogenesis independently from membrane fusion. EMBO Rep. 18, 451–463. doi: 10.15252/embr.201642931

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rugarli, E. I., and Langer, T. (2012). Mitochondrial quality control: a matter of life and death for neurons. EMBO J. 31, 1336–1349. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2012.38

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sancak, Y., Markhard, A. L., Kitami, T., Kovács-bogdán, E., Kamer, K. J., Udeshi, N. D., et al. (2013). EMRE is an essential component. Science 147, 1379–1382. doi: 10.1126/science.1242993

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shoshan-Barmatz, V., Krelin, Y., and Shteinfer-Kuzmine, A. (2018). VDAC1 functions in Ca²⁺ homeostasis and cell life and death in health and disease. Cell Calcium 69, 81–100. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2017.06.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shoshan-Barmatz, V., and Mizrachi, D. (2012). VDAC1: from structure to cancer therapy. Front. Oncol. 2:164. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2012.00164

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Smilansky, A., Dangoor, L., Nakdimon, I., Ben-Hail, D., Mizrachi, D., and Shoshan-Barmatz, V. (2015). The voltage-dependent anion channel 1 mediates amyloid β toxicity and represents a potential target for Alzheimer disease therapy. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 30670–30683. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.691493

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Szabadkai, G., Bianchi, K., Várnai, P., De Stefani, D., Wieckowski, M. R., Cavagna, D., et al. (2006). Chaperone-mediated coupling of endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondrial Ca²⁺ channels. J. Cell Biol. 175, 901–911. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200608073

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Szymański, J., Janikiewicz, J., Michalska, B., Patalas-Krawczyk, P., Perrone, M., Ziółkowski, W., et al. (2017). Interaction of mitochondria with the endoplasmic reticulum and plasma membrane in calcium homeostasis, lipid trafficking and mitochondrial structure. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18, 1–24. doi: 10.3390/ijms18071576

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

van Vliet, A. R., Verfaillie, T., and Agostinis, P. (2014). New functions of mitochondria associated membranes in cellular signaling. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 1843, 2253–2262. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2014.03.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Waldeck-Weiermair, M., Malli, R., Parichatikanond, W., Gottschalk, B., Madreiter-Sokolowski, C. T., Klec, C., et al. (2015). Rearrangement of MICU1 multimers for activation of MCU is solely controlled by cytosolic Ca²⁺. Sci. Rep. 5, 1–10. doi: 10.1038/srep15602

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, L., Yang, X., Li, S., Wang, Z., Liu, Y., Feng, J., et al. (2014). Structural and mechanistic insights into MICU1 regulation of mitochondrial calcium uptake. EMBO J. 33, 594–604. doi: 10.1002/embj.201386523

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Weisthal, S., Keinan, N., Ben-Hail, D., Arif, T., and Shoshan-Barmatz, V. (2014). Ca²⁺-mediated regulation of VDAC1 expression levels is associated with cell death induction. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 1843, 2270–2281. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2014.03.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, J., Liu, L., Matsuda, T., Zhao, Y., Rebane, A., Drobizhev, M., et al. (2013). Improved orange and red Ca²⁺ indicators and photophysical considerations for optogenetic applications. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 4, 963–972. doi: 10.1021/cn400012b

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, Y., Araki, S., Wu, J., Teramoto, T., Chang, Y. F., Nakano, M., et al. (2011). An expanded palette of genetically encoded Ca²⁺ indicators. Science 333, 1888–1891. doi: 10.1126/science.1208592

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar