Original Research ARTICLE
Zebrafish Recoverin Isoforms Display Differences in Calcium Switch Mechanisms
- Department of Neuroscience, Biochemistry, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
Primary steps in vertebrate vision occur in rod and cone cells of the retina and require precise molecular switches in excitation, recovery, and adaptation. In particular, recovery of the photoresponse and light adaptation processes are under control of neuronal Ca2+ sensor (NCS) proteins. Among them, the Ca2+ sensor recoverin undergoes a pronounced Ca2+-dependent conformational change, a prototypical so-called Ca2+-myristoyl switch, which allows selective targeting of G protein-coupled receptor kinase. Zebrafish (Danio rerio) has gained attention as a model organism in vision research. It expresses four different recoverin isoforms (zRec1a, zRec1b, zRec2a, and zRec2b) that are orthologs to the one known mammalian variant. The expression pattern of the four isoforms cover both rod and cone cells, but the differential distribution in cones points to versatile functions of recoverin in these cell types. Initial functional studies on zebrafish larvae indicate different Ca2+-sensitive working modes for zebrafish recoverins, but experimental evidence is lacking so far. The aims of the present study are (1) to measure specific Ca2+-sensing properties of the different recoverin isoforms, (2) to ask whether switch mechanisms triggered by Ca2+ resemble that one observed with mammalian recoverin, and (3) to investigate a possible impact of an attached myristoyl moiety. For addressing these questions, we employ fluorescence spectroscopy, surface plasmon resonance (SPR), dynamic light scattering, and equilibrium centrifugation. Exposure of hydrophobic amino acids, due to the myristoyl switch, differed among isoforms and depended also on the myristoylation state of the particular recoverin. Ca2+-induced rearrangement of the protein-water shell was for all variants less pronounced than for the bovine ortholog indicating either a modified Ca2+-myristoyl switch or no switch. Our results have implications for a step-by-step response of recoverin isoforms to changing intracellular Ca2+ during illumination.
Light-dependent changes in the second messenger concentration of cGMP and Ca2+-ions control the photoresponse characteristics of vertebrate rod and cone cells (Arshavsky and Burns, 2012; Koch and Dell’Orco, 2013). Feedback control of phototransduction in rod and cone cells crucially depends on cytoplasmic Ca2+ that is detected by photoreceptor specific neuronal Ca2+-sensor (NCS) proteins. Recoverin is a NCS protein and inhibits G protein-coupled receptor kinase GRK1, also known as rhodopsin kinase, at high levels of free Ca2+ concentration. Biochemical in vitro data and results on recoverin knockout mice support such a role of recoverin (Kawamura, 1993; Gorodovikova et al., 1994; Chen et al., 1995; Klenchin et al., 1995; Senin et al., 1995; Makino et al., 2004). However, several questions concerning the physiological role of recoverin are still under debate (Morshedian et al., 2018). Strongly coupled with recoverin’s function is its so-called Ca2+-myristoyl switch (Zozulya and Stryer, 1992; Dizhoor et al., 1993). Recoverin is posttranslationally modified with a myristoyl group at its N-terminus. In the Ca2+-free state, this acyl moiety is buried inside a hydrophobic cleft. Under saturating Ca2+ concentrations, the two functional Ca2+-binding sites in recoverin are occupied and the myristoyl group is exposed and can thereby interact with phospholipid membranes (Ames et al., 1995; Senin et al., 2002).
The pronounced conformational change and subsequent membrane translocation in response to changes in Ca2+ have made recoverin a working model for myristoyl switch mechanisms (Ames et al., 1997; Lange and Koch, 1997). Recent studies address the influence of lipid composition and membrane fluidity upon interaction of recoverin with membranes (Calvez et al., 2016; Potvin-Fournier et al., 2016, 2017; Yang et al., 2016), the impact on the structural organization of phospholipids (Brand and Koch, 2018), the orientation of membrane anchored recoverin (Timr et al., 2017), the intermediate states during Ca2+-dependent conformational transitions investigated by molecular dynamics simulations (Timr et al., 2018), and the complex interactions of recoverin with liposomes and CaF2 nanoparticles (Marino et al., 2014).
The zebrafish (Danio rerio) retina expresses four recoverin genes, rcv1a, rcv1b, rcv2a, and rcv2b coding for proteins zRec1a, zRec1b, zRec2a, and zRec2b, respectively (Zang et al., 2015). These recoverin isoforms differ in their expression pattern in the adult retina as zRec1a was only found in rods and UV cones, whereas all other zRec forms are present in all cone photoreceptors, but immunohistochemical staining of zRec2a is also seen in bipolar cells. The in vivo function of zRec proteins was studied by a morpholino-based targeted gene knockdown approach and normal and spectrum electroretinography (ERG). Target binding and regulation is suggested to occur with orthologs of mammalian GRK1 and GRK7 (Wada et al., 2006; genes annotated as grk1a, grk1b, grk7a, and grk7b) yielding pairs GRK1a-Rec1a (in rods) and GRK7a-Rec2a (in UV cones), but regulation of GRK1b and GRK7b by Rec2b is feasible as well (Rinner et al., 2005; Zang et al., 2015). According to the flash response data, zRec2a and zRec2b operate under different light regimes indicating different Ca2+-sensitive properties. Except for the studies of Zang et al. (2015), no molecular properties of zRec variants are known so far.
Guanylate cyclase-activating proteins (GCAPs) are related to recoverin and are activator/inhibitor proteins that regulate membrane bound sensory guanylate cyclases (Palczewski et al., 2004; Dizhoor et al., 2010; Koch and Dell’Orco, 2013). The variety of zRec isoforms is reminiscent of zebrafish GCAPs, of which six isoforms are expressed in the zebrafish retina (Imanishi et al., 2004; Rätscho et al., 2009). Detailed studies on zGCAP expression profiles in larval and adult animals, their regulatory properties, Ca2+ sensitivities, and conformational dynamics revealed a differential action mode for each protein supporting a Ca2+ relay mode of Ca2+-dependent negative feedback regulation (Scholten and Koch, 2011; Fries et al., 2012; Sulmann et al., 2015; Lim et al., 2017). We suggest a similar regulatory mode for zRec forms. A first step to unravel the mechanism of differential response properties of zRec to oscillating changes in cytoplasmic Ca2+ concentration is to investigate possible Ca2+-myristoyl switches, to determine their Ca2+-binding properties and conformational dynamics.
Materials and Methods
Protein Expression and Purification
All recoverin isoforms (zRec1a, zRec1b, zRec2a, and zRec2b) were heterologously expressed in Escherichia coli as described previously for bovine recoverin (bRec) (Lange and Koch, 1997; Senin et al., 2002). The zRec cDNA were provided by Prof. Dr. Stephan Neuhauss (University of Zurich, Switzerland) and cloned into plasmids pET21a(+) (zRec2b) or pET11d(+) (zRec1a, zRec1b, and zRec2a) by standard cloning techniques. To obtain myristoylated isoforms, E. coli cells were cotransformed with the plasmid pBB131 containing a gene for the yeast N-myristoyltransferase. After cell lysis, the isoforms were extracted from the insoluble fraction by homogenization in 6 M guanidine-hydrochloride and following refolding by dialysis against Tris buffer (20 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM DTT, pH 8.0). The soluble and insoluble fractions of all recoverin forms were purified by a hydrophobic interaction chromatography except of zRec1b, which was purified by an ammonium sulfate precipitation followed by a size exclusion chromatography. After purification, recoverin containing fractions were combined and dialyzed against 50 mM ammonium hydrogen carbonate to remove residual EGTA that is present from the hydrophobic interaction chromatography step, followed by a buffer exchange against decalcified 50 mM ammonium hydrogen carbonate (purified recoverin samples are shown in Supplementary Figure S1A). Degree of myristoylation was determined by reversed phase high-performance liquid chromatography as previously described (Lange and Koch, 1997; Senin et al., 2002) yielding 89% (zRec1a), 63% (zRec1b), 96% (zRec2a), 73% (zRec2b), and 96% (bRec).
Recombinant non-myristoylated zrecoverin isoforms were used as antigens by a company (Pineda, Berlin, Germany) for producing polyclonal antibodies in rabbits. The obtained sera were further purified with an affinity chromatography column. For this purpose, each recombinant non-myristoylated recoverin (zRec1a, zRec1b, zRec2a, and zRec2b) was immobilized on a CNBr-activated sepharose column and the corresponding serum was passed over the column to remove unspecific antibodies. Due to the elution, all antibodies were diluted 1:10. Anti-zRec2a crossreacted also with zRec2b; therefore, two purification steps were necessary. The first step was catching cross-reactive antibodies by immobilizing zRec2b to the column and collecting the non-bound fraction, which was passed over the zRec2a affinity column in the second step. The specificities of all antibodies were tested via western blot (Supplementary Figure S1B).
Ca2+-Dependent Membrane Binding
An equilibrium centrifugation assay was performed to study the membrane binding of all recoverin isoforms in a Ca2+-dependent manner (Senin et al., 2002). For this assay, 1 mg/ml recoverin in HEPES buffer (10 mM HEPES/KOH, 150 mM NaCl, 20 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, pH 7.4) were incubated with 2 mg/ml urea-washed rod outer segment (ROS) membranes and 2 mM CaCl2 or 2 mM EGTA. After 30 min of incubation (25°C, 700 rpm), the samples were centrifuged (30 min, 13,000 rpm), supernatants were discarded, and pellets were resuspended with 2 mM CaCl2 or 2 mM EGTA in HEPES buffer to remove unbound recoverin. After additional 30 min of centrifugation, supernatants were discarded and pellets were resolved in sample buffer. The samples were separated by SDS-PAGE, followed by a protein transfer to a nitrocellulose membrane by a semi-dry blotting using Towbin buffer (25 mM Tris, 192 μM glycine, 20% methanol p.a.). After the transfer, all blots were blocked with 1% milk powder (1 h, RT) in TBS-T (20 mM Tris, 154 mM NaCl, 0.05 % Tween-20). After blocking, incubation followed with primary specific antibodies against zRec isoforms (see below) and against bRec (rabbit anti-Rec k/2+; Lambrecht and Koch, 1992). Primary antibodies in 1% milk powder in TBS-T were incubated for 1 h at room temperature using the following dilutions: for zRec1b (1:20,000), zRec2b (1:40,000), and bRec (1:30,000). Anti-zRec1a and Anti-zRec2a antibodies were incubated over night at 4°C (dilution: zRec1a at 1:20,000, zRec2a at 1:10,000). Incubation with primary antibodies was followed by incubation with the secondary antibody that was a goat anti-rabbit IgG coupled to peroxidase (Dianova) for 1 h at room temperature. Dilution was for all zRecs 1:20,000, and for bRec 1:30,000. Every incubation step was followed by different washing steps with TBS and TBS-T. For visualization, membranes were incubated for 1 min in WesternBright reagents (Avansta) and then exposed to LucentBlue X-ray films (Advansta). Signal intensity was determined by a densitometric analysis of antibody reactive bands with an AlphaImager (Biozym). For each band, the integral density value (IDV) was determined by measuring the density in a certain area and subtracting the background of the blot.
Determination of Ca2+-Binding Constants
A chelator assay was employed for the determination of macroscopic Ca2+-binding constants (Linse, 2002; Dell’Orco et al., 2010a) with the following modifications. Oregon GreenTM 488 BAPTA-5N (Invitrogen) was used instead of Dibromo-BAPTA as the competing chelator. It has a KD value of 20 μM in MOPS buffer (10 mM MOPS, 100 mM KCl, pH 7.2) (Agronskaia et al., 2004), thus matching the Ca2+-binding constants for myristoylated and non-myristoylated bRec (17 μM for myristoylated bRec, 0.11 and 6.9 μM for non-myristoylated bRec, respectively; Ames et al., 1995). Using non-myristoylated bRec as internal standard, we validated the method for our purpose yielding a pattern of similar apparent KD values ( = 0.79 μM and = 13.7 μM). Recoverin concentrations of stock solutions were determined by using a recoverin-specific Bradford calibration curve. Titrations were performed with 15 μM recoverin and 0.5 μM BAPTA-5N in decalcified MOPS buffer. To decalcify the buffer, the buffer passed several times over a Chelex column (Chelex 100® sodium form, Sigma). The initial [Ca2+] in the titration was determined by BAPTA and ranged between 15 and 60 nM. Chelator fluorescence spectra were measured with a fluorescence spectrophotometer from Photon Technology International using excitation at 494 nm and recording emission spectra between 500 and 560 nm. The Ca2+ titration was performed by using calcium stocks of 3 mM and 30 mM CaCl2 in decalcified MOPS-buffer. In a total volume of 500 μl protein solution, 15 injections of 0.5 μl of 3 mM CaCl2, followed by seven injections of 0.5 μl of 30 mM CaCl2 were done. For each [Ca2+], the peak amplitude at 524 nm was determined, normalized, plotted as a function of free calcium concentration and fitted by the CaLigator software (Andre and Linse, 2002).
Surface Plasmon Resonance
A Biacore 2000 and Biacore 3000 surface plasmon resonance (SPR) instrument (GE Healthcare) was used for detecting Ca2+-induced conformational changes of recoverin variants as described before for other NCS proteins (Dell’Orco et al., 2010b, 2012; Sulmann et al., 2014). Immobilization at high densities on a commercially available CM5 sensor chip (GE Healthcare) is a prerequisite for the detection of conformational transitions by SPR as previously outlined in detail (Sulmann et al., 2014). All myristoylated (myr) recoverin variants were immobilized by thiol coupling yielding sufficient immobilization densities between 4 and 13 ng × mm-2 (1000 RU correspond to 1 ng protein per mm2; myr bRec = 3.6-5.4 ng × mm-2, myr zRec1a = 7.9 ng × mm-2, myr zRec2a = 12.6-13.5 ng × mm-2, myr zRec2b = 11.1 ng × mm-2). After immobilization, increasing [Ca2+] in a decalcified Tris buffer (5 mM Tris, 100 mM KCl, pH 7.5) were injected and flushed over the protein surface. Control injections over an empty flow cell were performed and subtracted from the sample flow cell (Dell’Orco et al., 2010b, 2012; Sulmann et al., 2014). By plotting the amplitude of the RU signal as a function of free [Ca2+], the half maximal change of response amplitude was determined after normalization by SigmaPlot 13 with a dynamic curve fitting with sigmoidal equation of each experiment, followed by averaging all K1/2 values and determining the standard deviation. The experiment was only performed with myristoylated isoforms; it was not possible to immobilize non-myristoylated isoforms in a sufficient amount. Furthermore, immobilization and subsequent titrations also failed with zRec1b.
Changes in fluorescence emission of 8-anilinonaphthalene-1-sulfonic acid (ANS) caused by interaction with exposed protein regions (Hughes et al., 1995; Gorczyca et al., 2003) were recorded with a fluorescence spectrophotometer from Photon Technology International. Lyophilized protein was dissolved in HEPES buffer (80 mM HEPES/KOH, 40 mM KCl, 1 mM DTT, pH 7.5) and protein concentration was determined by a Bradford assay (Bradford, 1976). For every experiment, 2 μM recoverin variant, 2.5 μM ANS, and a certain [Ca2+] in HEPES buffer were incubated for 20 min on ice. For every [Ca2+] above 1 μM, a CaCl2 stock solution in HEPES buffer was prepared, every [Ca2+] under 1 μM was adjusted by a mixture of K2H2EGTA and K2CaEGTA (Tsien and Pozzan, 1989). ANS fluorescence excitation was performed at 380 nm, and emission spectra were recorded between 400 and 550 nm. After every measurement, the cuvette was cleaned by 70% ethanol, 5 mM EGTA, 100% acetone, and several steps of water in between. Data recording and processing were done with the software Felix32 (Photon Technology International). Maximal fluorescence emission for every [Ca2+] was determined, normalized and plotted as a function of free [Ca2+]. In SigmaPlot 13, a dynamic curve fitting with sigmoidal equation was used to determine a half maximal value (K1/2) of each experiment, followed by averaging all K1/2 values and determining the standard deviation.
Dynamic Light Scattering
Dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements were performed with a Zetasizer Nano-S (Malvern Instruments). For the experiment a polystyrene, disposable, semi-micro cuvette (Ratiolab) was used. Refractive index and viscosity were set to 1.330 and 0.8872 cP (values for water), and temperature was set to 25°C with 2 min equilibration time. The measurement angle was 173° backscatter, and the analysis model was set to multiple narrow models (high resolution). For each measurement, a minimum of 11 runs with 30 repetitions were performed. The used Tris buffer (5 mM Tris, 100 mM KCl, pH 7.5) was filtered through a Rotilabo®syringe filter (Carl Roth, 0.22 μM PDVF). Lyophilized protein was dissolved in decalcified Tris-buffer, protein concentration was determined by a Bradford assay and adjusted to a final concentration of 10 μM. After adjusting either a calcium concentration or EGTA concentration of 1 mM, the protein solution was filtered by an AnotopTM 10 filter (Whatman, 0.02 μm) and the measurement was started. After recording, mean and standard deviation for each recoverin variant was determined.
Ca2+-Myristoyl Switch and Ca2+Affinity of zRec Variants
Bovine recoverin shows a reversible binding to membranes triggered by changes in free Ca2+ concentration. This translocation process is connected to the functional role of mammalian recoverin controlling the activity of mammalian GRK1 in a Ca2+-dependent manner, inhibiting GRK1 at high Ca2+, and relieving the inhibition at low Ca2+. All zRec forms contain a consensus sequence for myristoylation and could in principle undergo a Ca2+-myristoyl switch and membrane translocation process. Therefore, we tested purified myristoylated and non-myristoylated zRec variants in a membrane binding assay using an equilibrium centrifugation assay. Surprisingly, only zRec1a, and to a lesser extent zRec2a, interacted with membranes in a Ca2+-dependent way like it is known from bRec (Figure 1A). bRec served as a benchmark control, since its Ca2+-dependent association with membranes or lipid mixtures is well described in test tube experiments that show 20-25% of total applied recoverin (Zozulya and Stryer, 1992; Senin et al., 2002). The other myristoylated zRec forms did not show a pronounced Ca2+ dependency during membrane binding. Instead, the non-myristoylated zRec forms exhibited an untypical binding pattern (Figure 1B) as all isoforms except zRec2b bound stronger to the membrane in their Ca2+-free state. By contrast, zRec2b showed no difference between its Ca2+-free and Ca2+-bound state.
FIGURE 1. Ca2+-dependent membrane association of recoverin variants. An equilibrium centrifugation assay was performed with urea-washed ROS membranes and binding of myristoylated (A) and non-myristoylated (B) recoverin forms was probed in the presence (2 mM Ca2+) or absence (2 mM EGTA) of Ca2+. Variants of zRec and bRec were detected by isoform specific antibodies via western blotting, followed by a densitometric analysis of protein bands. IDV, integral density value; myr, myristoylated; nm, non-myristoylated. Shown is the mean ± s.d. N = 4, (EGTA) N = 5; nm zRec2a (Ca2+) N = 5, (EGTA) N = 4; myr zRec2b (Ca2+) N = 5, (EGTA) N = 7; nm zRec2b (Ca2+ and EGTA) N = 5.
Furthermore, we determined the Ca2+-binding affinities of zRec forms by measuring macroscopic Ca2+-binding constants with a modified chelator method (Figure 2 and Table 1). A representative example of a titration is displayed in Figure 2 for myristoylated zRec2a revealing an apparent KD of 11.9 μM (Table 1), which is close to the apparent KD values of 14-17 μM obtained previously with bRec (Ames et al., 1995; Senin et al., 2002; Weiergräber et al., 2006). Myristoylated zRec1a with an apparent KD of 15.4 μM fell also in this range. Larger differences became visible with myristoylated zRec1b and zRec2b revealing 9.2 and 23.4 μM, respectively (Table 1). Titrations with non-myristoylated zRec isoforms allowed the determination of two apparent KD values. Fitting of binding curves gave for all zRec isoforms one apparent KD of higher affinity and one of lower affinity (Table 1) resembling the Ca2+-binding studies with non-myristoylated bRec (Section “Materials and Methods”; Ames et al., 1995; Senin et al., 2002; Weiergräber et al., 2006). Previous 45Ca2+-binding studies assigned the KD values of different affinities to the functional EF hands 2 and 3 in bRec (Senin et al., 2002). Although our data seem to reproduce the general pattern of high and low affinities, they indicate in all cases lower affinity of non-myristoylated zrecoverin variants for Ca2+.
FIGURE 2. Ca2+ binding to myristoylated zRec2a by a competitive chelator assay. Chelator assay was performed with myristoylated (myr) zRec2a and Oregon GreenTM 488 BAPTA-5N. Chelator fluorescence spectra were measured by excitation at 494 nm and emission spectra were recorded between 500 and 560 nm. For each [Ca2+], the peak at 524 nm was normalized, plotted as a function of free calcium concentration and fitted by the CaLigator software. Titration with myristoylated zRec2a is a representative example of Ca2+ titration performed with all recoverin variants yielding an apparent of 11.9 ± 2.3 μM. Red line corresponds to the titration of the chelator without protein, and the blue line corresponds to the titration in the presence of myristoylated zRec2a.
Although all myristoylated zRec forms bound Ca2+ with moderate, but different affinity, they differed in their Ca2+-dependent membrane attachment. A lack of Ca2+-dependent attachment to the membrane could indicate that these zRec forms do not exhibit a large or distinct conformational change leading to the typical Ca2+-myristoyl switch. Therefore, we tested for conformational transitions in zRec variants by three different independent methods, SPR, ANS fluorescence spectroscopy, and dynamic light scattering (DLS), which allow the investigation of conformational changes from different perspectives.
Surface Plasmon Resonance
Ca2+-sensor proteins such as recoverin are well suited for monitoring conformational changes by SPR devices under precisely defined experimental conditions (Dell’Orco et al., 2010b, 2012; Sulmann et al., 2014). For this purpose, we immobilized zRec variants on hydrophilic dextran-coated sensor chips and injected increasing concentrations of CaCl2 in the nanomolar to micromolar range (Figure 3). All titrations with immobilized myristoylated zRec variants showed an increase in the maximal amplitudes at defined Ca2+ concentrations resembling those reversible changes in resonance units (RU) that were previously reported for bRec. Table 2 gives a summary of the determined K1/2 values (Ca2+ concentration at which the increase in amplitudes is half-maximal). K1/2 values of zRec forms are around 9-10 μM and are thus slightly higher than 6.1 μM obtained for bRec and those reported in the literature (Dell’Orco et al., 2010b, 2012; Sulmann et al., 2014). These titrations demonstrate that zRec forms undergo distinct conformational changes reflecting changes in the hydrodynamic properties of the protein and that these changes seem to be triggered at similar [Ca2+]. However, they do not provide information about Ca2+-dependent exposition of domains or regions, about Ca2+-sensitive changes in hydrodynamic parameters or about the movement of the myristoyl group.
FIGURE 3. Ca2+-dependent conformational changes of immobilized zRec2a monitored by surface plasmon resonance. SPR response of zRec2a at increasing free [Ca2+]. Maximal amplitude of each [Ca2+] injection were normalized, averaged, and plotted as a function of free [Ca2+] and were fitted by SigmaPlot 13. Half maximal change of zRec2a occurred at 9.1 ± 1.7 μM. For statistical analysis and values obtained with other recoverin variants, see Table 2.
ANS Fluorescence Spectroscopy
ANS interacts non-covalently with hydrophobic regions in proteins. Ca2+ binding to zRec variants could trigger the exposure or burying of hydrophobic parts (the myristoyl group or hydrophobic amino acid residues) and therefore, can monitor conformational changes of the whole protein by increasing (or decreasing) fluorescence emission. ANS fluorescence emission of myristoylated zRec2a was half-maximal at a K1/2 of 22.6 μM [Ca2+] (Figure 4) similar to the bovine control variant (24.6 μM, Supplementary Table S1). All other zRec forms showed significantly different K1/2 values being either fivefold lower (myristoylated zRec1b) or two- to-threefold higher (Supplementary Table S1). However, more unexpected differences became visible except for zRec1a, when we compared myristoylated and non-myristoylated variants (Supplementary Table S1) indicating a more specialized role of the myristoyl moiety for each zRec (see Section “Discussion” below).
FIGURE 4. Normalized fluorescence emission of ANS interacting with myristoylated zRec2a. (A) Representative titration of 2 μM zRec2a with increasing [Ca2+] causing an increase of the ANS fluorescence emission. ANS fluorescence spectra were measured by excitation at 380 nm and emission spectra were recorded between 400 and 550 nm. Maximal fluorescence emission was normalized and plotted as a function of free [Ca2+]. After recording, all measurements of the same isoform were normalized, averaged and half maximal value (K1/2) was determined by SigmaPlot 13. K1/2 of myristoylated zRec2a was 22.6 ± 2 μM. (B) Fluorescence spectra of ANS were measured at high [Ca2+] of 500 μM and at low [Ca2+] of 1000 μM EGTA. Difference (ΔF) between high and low [Ca2+] showed the change in fluorescence intensity along myristoylated (B) and non-myristoylated (C) recoverin isoforms.
We further analyzed difference fluorescence spectra providing information about the net fluorescence change between the Ca2+-saturating and the Ca2+-free state (Figures 4B,C). Most similar to the myristoylated bRec control was zRec2a, all other zRec variants exhibited lower net changes leading to the following sequence of ΔF: bRec > zRec2a > zRec1a > zRec2b > zRec1b. This pattern changed completely, when the myristoyl group was absent leading to a large net change in zRec1b, a lower change for other zRec forms that was still higher than the comparison with bRec (ΔF: zRec1b > zRec2a > zRec2b > zRec1a/bRec; Figure 4C). Maximal amplitudes of ANS fluorescence emission in the presence of Ca2+ gave an identical sequence (Supplementary Table S2).
Dynamic Light Scattering
For dynamic light scattering, all recoverin isoforms were investigated in the absence and presence of Ca2+ to determine a potential difference in the conformation based on Ca2+ binding. Every variant was tested at least 40 times in a myristoylated and non-myristoylated form. To determine the hydrodynamic radius, an intensity plot of DLS data was used. The intensity plot showed one higher peak and one lower peak (Figure 5A). Concerning the absence of the second peak in a number plot (Figure 5B), the second peak was negligible and only the first peak was used for the further analysis. This peak reflected the size of the investigated protein revealing the hydrodynamic radius (Figure 5C). Myristoylated bRec showed the largest difference of the hydrodynamic radius between the Ca2+-bound and Ca2+-free state among all recoverin forms (Table 3) revealing for the Ca2+-bound state, a larger hydrodynamic radius of 7.54 ± 0.17 nm than for the Ca2+-free state, 6.15 ± 0.14 nm (Table 3). Nearly all other myristoylated zRec forms also showed a larger hydrodynamic radius in the Ca2+-bound state but the difference was not as prominent as for the bovine form. Only myristoylated zRec2a had a slightly larger hydrodynamic radius in the Ca2+-free state (Table 3).
FIGURE 5. Dynamic light scattering measurement of zRec2a. Exemplary intensity (A) and number (B) plot of zRec2a in presence of Ca2+. DLS data reported the intensity of scattering light as % of the total area. The second peak in the intensity versus size plot originates from oligomeric or aggregated protein. However, the number plot refers to the relative percentage of sizes showing that only a very low percentage of the total protein is in oligomeric or aggregated form. (C) Comparison of the hydrodynamic diameter d (in nm) of zRec2a in the presence (2 mM Ca2+) and absence (2 mM EGTA) of Ca2+. For statistical analysis, see Table 3.
All non-myristoylated zRec forms except zRec2b have a larger hydrodynamic radius in the Ca2+-free than in the Ca2+-bound state (Table 3), which was opposite to non-myristoylated bRec, whose hydrodynamic radius was nearly the same in the Ca2+-bound (6.4 ± 0.11 nm) than in the Ca2+-free state (6.34 ± 0.13 nm).
Zebrafish recoverin isoforms share a high sequence homology to the bovine (or mammalian) ortholog (Supplementary Figure S2). However, our comparative analysis of the molecular properties of zebrafish recoverin forms demonstrate a pattern of significant differences, which we will discuss for each of the experimental approaches.
Mammalian recoverin, in particular bRec, is the prototype of those NCS proteins that undergo a Ca2+-myristoyl switch, which has been probed experimentally by measuring the Ca2+-dependent binding of myristoylated Rec forms to biological membranes (Zozulya and Stryer, 1992; Dizhoor et al., 1993; Senin et al., 2002). Other NCS proteins undergoing a Ca2+-myristoyl switch are, for example, hippocalcin, neurocalcin δ, and visinin-like proteins 1 and 3 (Kobayashi et al., 1993; Ladant, 1995; Spilker et al., 2000, 2002). In the Ca2+-free state, the myristoyl group is buried in a protein cleft consisting of hydrophobic amino acid side chains. All zRec variants have identical (or highly conserved) amino acids at the corresponding positions (Figure 6A) indicating that all Ca2+-free zRec isoforms keep the myristoyl group buried in a hydrophobic pocket. Critical residues for the Ca2+-triggered transition (and extrusion of the myristoyl group) are Gly42 and Gly96, around which rotational movements occur, and His68 and Leu108, which are involved in the changing domain interactions of EF-hand 2 and 3 (Ames et al., 2002). All these amino acids are identical in zRec variants and bRec. Differences in Ca2+-switch mechanisms as we see with zRec1b and zRec2b must therefore have other causes (see Section “Discussion” further below).
FIGURE 6. Protein regions that are important for recoverin function. (A) Highly conserved amino acid positions forming the hydrophobic myristoyl pocket. (B) EF hands 2 and 3 of bRec with Ca2+-bound (magenta). The essential Glu (E) is indicated in EF-hand 3. An Asn was replaced in silico by Pro (P) to illustrate a possible interference with the position of Glu. Images were created by Pymol using coordinates of Ca2+-free and Ca2+-bound bRec (PDB codes: 1IKU and 1JSA, Tanaka et al., 1995; Ames et al., 1997).
Unexpected was the higher binding of Ca2+-free non-myristoylated zRec1a, 1b, and 2a to membranes than binding of their Ca2+-saturated forms to membranes. Binding of proteins to membranes can be the result of hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions. Amino acid sequences of zRec isoforms differ in a few segments from those of bRec. Most of these short stretches of two to three amino acids show no consensus to corresponding amino acids in bRec. Furthermore, they are located on the protein surface (Supplementary Figure S3) and could account for the observed differences.
Ca2+ affinities of zRec isoforms should determine Ca2+sensitive properties such as the Ca2+-dependent membrane association. In mammalian and zebrafish recoverin forms, the two functional EF hands 2 and 3 are highly conserved in all critical positions with oxygen containing side chains (Supplementary Figure S2). However, in EF-hand 3 of zRec2b, a Pro is at the N-terminal part of the exiting helix and located next to the Glu that is essential for Ca2+ coordination. Figure 6B illustrates the position of Glu next to Pro that is substituted for Asn. Pro interfering with the helix structure could slightly disturb or shift the position of the complexing Glu leading to the lower Ca2+ affinity observed with zRec2b. Furthermore, the C-terminus in bRec was previously identified as an internal modulator of Ca2+ sensitivity. Truncation of C-terminal amino acids causes a shift to lower Ca2+ affinity in bRec (Weiergräber et al., 2006), which very likely determines the differences in Ca2+ affinity of zRec forms. In particular, not only zRec2b but also zRec2a lack the 12 or 10 amino acids, which are present in bRec. However, this C-terminal stretch is present in zRec1a and 1b with only some minor amino acid differences. Thus, the lack of the C-terminus cannot account alone for differences in Ca2+ sensitivities.
Binding of Ca2+ to bRec occurs in a sequential order with binding first to EF-hand 3 and second to EF-hand 2 (Permyakov et al., 2000; Senin et al., 2002), thereby triggering the conformational change. Binding of Ca2+ to zRec isoforms triggers in all variants conformational changes, which we could show by different experimental approaches. Changes in conformation detected by SPR spectroscopy was half maximal in the lower micromolar range in agreement with the Ca2+ affinity constants determined with the chelator assay, although differences in affinity constants are not directly mirrored by the SPR K1/2 values. We have observed and discussed this apparent mismatch in previous contributions concluding that the empirical parameter K1/2 reflects a concerted binding-conformational process (Dell’Orco et al., 2010b, 2012; Sulmann et al., 2014), which occur in different NCS proteins.
ANS fluorescence emission is a tool to estimate the increase of solvent accessible hydrophobic surfaces depending on experimental conditions, for example, Ca2+-binding (Hughes et al., 1995; Gorczyca et al., 2003). It has previously been noticed that myristoylated and non-myristoylated bRec expose a large hydrophobic patch on Ca2+ binding (yellow labeled amino acids in Figure 7; Weiergräber et al., 2003). Aromatic and aliphatic amino acids constituting this hydrophobic patch are Leu28, Phe23, Trp31, Phe35, Ile44, Phe56, Phe57, Leu81, Phe83, and Leu90 and are identical in all zRec isoforms except for zRec1a and zRec1b, where Phe23 is replaced by Tyr. The increase in polarity by the presence of Tyr might decrease the general hydrophobicity of the patch (Figure 7) and could partially account for the lower ΔF value determined for zRec1a and even more for zRec1b, where the surface of the patch decreases.
FIGURE 7. Surface presentation of myristoylated bRec with two bound Ca2+. Hydrophobic patches are indicated in yellow and orange. Replacement of Phe23 by Tyr (Y) is indicated on the right part of the image. Images were created by Pymol using coordinates of Ca2+-bound bRec (PDB code 1JSA).
Two other hydrophobic patches of lower size are visible on the surface of bRec, one made of Leu167, Phe172, Ile173, Leu187, and Ala188 and the second one made of Phe158, Phe159, Ile182, Leu183, Leu185, and Ile186. The latter one forms a kind of canyon-like structure, in which Ile182 in bRec is replaced by Ala and Gly in zRec2a and zRec2b, respectively (orange labeled, Figure 7). This hydrophobic groove might be another target of ANS. The Gly in zRec2b decreases the degree of hydrophobicity thereby lowering binding of ANS, whereas Ala in zRec2a has a side chain of lower hydrophobicity than Ile, but probably sufficient for ANS binding (Supplementary Tables S1, S2). In non-myristoylated bRec, the large hydrophobic patch is solvent accessible in both forms of bRec, with one or two Ca2+ bound (Supplementary Figure S4 Weiergräber et al., 2003; Kumar et al., 2015). The hydrophobic canyon-like cleft seems to be exposed increasing the general hydrophobicity, although ANS binding to bRec occurred to nearly the same extent independent on the presence of the myristoyl group. Since we lack the three-dimensional structure of any zRec, we have no structure based explanation for the large increase in ANS fluorescence for the zRec isoforms, in particular for non-myristoylated zRec1b. We hypothesize that Ca2+-triggered conformational changes in zRec forms differ from those of bRec, which is already indicated by the differences in membrane association, but became even more apparent in our DLS data. All non-myristoylated zRec isoforms except zRec2b had a larger hydrodynamic radius in the Ca2+-free than in the Ca2+-bound state, which was opposite to bRec. Among all zRec forms, non-myristoylated zRec1b showed the largest difference, which correlates with the high ΔF value in Figure 4C and might even explain the unusual binding of zRec1b to membranes in the absence of Ca2+. A similar correlation of DLS data and the ΔF value was visible for non-myristoylated zRec2a, and this variant showed also higher binding to membranes in the absence of Ca2+ than in the presence, but to a general lower degree (Figure 1B). However, other zRec variants did not exhibit similar correlations.
We conclude from these observations that all zRec isoforms undergo Ca2+-triggered transitions, but some or all attain different conformations with consequences for the biochemical properties. Recent work by Zang et al. (2015) investigating recoverin deficient larvae suggested that zRec1a could be replaced by zRec2a. This is in agreement with both proteins sharing a similar Ca2+ sensitivity, which can be seen in their similar KD values (Table 1). Zang et al. further showed that cone photoresponse recovery differs in zRec2a and zRec2b morphants depending on illumination that triggers transient changes in cytoplasmic Ca2+ concentration (Brockerhoff et al., 2003; Cilluffo et al., 2004; Leung et al., 2007). These findings are in agreement with the about twofold different Ca2+-binding constants that we determined for zRec2a and zRec2b (Table 1). Membrane binding and Ca2+-binding constants of zRec1a were the most similar to those of bRec. Due to the expression of zRec1a in rods (and UV cones) and the relationship of their targets zGRK1a and bovine GRK1, our results are in agreement with a functional pair of zRec1a and zGRK1a. Finally, we cannot exclude that one or more zRec forms target a different protein as this was observed for bRec interacting with caldendrin (Fries et al., 2010) and suggested for mammalian recoverin that is involved in the signal transmission between rod and bipolar cells (Sampath et al., 2005). For example, the high ability of non-myristoylated zRec forms to associate with membranes in low Ca2+ concentration in combination with the DLS data could point to conformational differences that are suitable for interacting with different targets.
DE, AS, and K-WK designed the study. DE and AS performed experiments. DE and K-WK analyzed data. K-WK wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors corrected and approved the final version of the manuscript.
This work was supported by a grant from the Science Ministry of Lower Saxony (Lichtenberg stipend to DE) and by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG; KO948 15-1).
Conflict of Interest Statement
The reviewer PG and handling editor declared their shared affiliation at the time of the review.
The authors thank Werner Säftel for excellent technical assistance.
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnmol.2018.00355/full#supplementary-material
Ames, J. B., Hamasaki, N., and Molchanova, T. (2002). Structure and calcium-binding studies of a recoverin mutant (E85Q) in an allosteric intermediate state. Biochemistry 41, 5776–5787. doi: 10.1021/bi012153k
Ames, J. B., Porumb, T., Tanaka, T., Ikura, M., and Stryer, L. (1995). Amino-terminal myristoylation induces cooperative calcium binding to recoverin. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 4526–4533. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.9.4526
Bradford, M. M. (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72, 248–254. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3
Brand, I., and Koch, K.-W. (2018). Impact of the protein myristoylation on the structure of a model cell membrane in a protein bound state. Bioelectrochemistry 124, 13–21. doi: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2018.06.006
Brockerhoff, S., Rieke, F., Matthews, H. R., Taylor, M. R., Kennedy, B., Ankoudinova, I., et al. (2003). Light stimulates a transducin-independent increase of cytoplasmic Ca2+ and suppression of current in cones from the zebrafish mutant nof. J. Neurosci. 23, 470–480. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-02-00470.2003
Calvez, P., Schmidt, T. F., Cantin, L., Klinker, K., and Salesse, C. (2016). Phosphatidylserine allows observation of the calcium-myristoyl switch of recoverin and its preferential binding. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 13533–13540. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b04218
Cilluffo, M. C., Matthews, H. R., Brockerhoff, S. E., and Fain, G. L. (2004). Light-induced Ca2+-release in the visible cones of the zebrafish. Vis. Neurosci. 21, 599–609. doi: 10.1017/S0952523804214092
Dell’Orco, D., Behnen, P., Linse, S., and Koch, K. W. (2010a). Calcium binding, structural stability and guanylate cyclase activation in GCAP1 variants associated with human cone dystrophy. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 67, 973–984. doi: 10.1007/s00018-009-0243-8
Dell’Orco, D., Müller, M., and Koch, K.-W. (2010b). Quantitative detection of conformational transitions in a calcium sensor protein by surface plasmon resonance. Chem. Commun. 46, 7316–7318. doi: 10.1039/c0cc02086a
Dell’Orco, D., Sulmann, S., Linse, S., and Koch, K.-W. (2012). Dynamics of conformational Ca2+-switches in signaling networks detected by a planar plasmonic device. Anal. Chem. 84, 2982–2989. doi: 10.1021/ac300213j
Dizhoor, A. M., Chen, C. K., Olshevskaya, E., Sinelnikova, V. V., Phillipov, P., and Hurley, J. B. (1993). Role of the acylated amino terminus of recoverin in Ca2+-dependent membrane interaction. Science 259, 829–832. doi: 10.1126/science.8430337
Dizhoor, A. M., Olshevskaya, E. V., and Peshenko, I. V. (2010). Mg2+/Ca2+ cation binding cycle of guanylyl cyclase activating proteins (GCAPs): role in regulation of photoreceptor guanylyl cyclase. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 334, 117–124. doi: 10.1007/s11010-009-0328-6
Fries, R., Reddy, P. P., Mikhaylova, M., Haverkamp, S., Wei, T., Müller, M., et al. (2010). Dynamic translocation of caldendrin is facilitated by the Ca2+-myristoyl switch of recoverin. J. Neurochem. 113, 1150–1162. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.06676.x
Gorczyca, W. A., Kobiałka, M., Kuropatwa, M., and Kurowska, E. (2003). Ca2+ differently affects hydrophobic properties of guanylyl cyclase-activating proteins (GCAPs) and recoverin. Acta Biochim. Pol. 50, 367–376.
Gorodovikova, E. N., Gimelbrant, A. A., Senin, I. I., and Philippov, P. P. (1994). Recoverin mediates the calcium effect upon rhodopsin phosphorylation and cGMP hydrolysis in bovine retina rod cells. FEBS Lett. 349, 187–190. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(94)00661-X
Imanishi, Y., Yang, L., Sokal, I., Filipek, S., Palczewski, K., and Baehr, W. (2004). Diversity of guanylate cyclase-activating proteins (GCAPs) in teleost fish: characterization of three novel GCAPs (GCAP4, GCAP5, GCAP7) from zebrafish (Danio rerio) and prediction of eight GCAPs (GCAP1-8) in pufferfish (Fugu rubripes). J. Mol. Evol. 59, 204–217. doi: 10.1007/s00239-004-2614-y
Klenchin, V. A., Calvert, P. D., and Bownds, M. D. (1995). Inhibition of rhodopsin kinase by recoverin. Further evidence for a negative feedback system in phototransduction. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 16147–16152. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.27.16147
Kumar, R. P., Ranaghan, M. J., Ganjei, A. Y., and Oprian, D. D. (2015). Crystal structure of recoverin with calcium ions bound to both functional EF hands. Biochemistry 54, 7222–7228. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b01160
Lange, C., and Koch, K.-W. (1997). Calcium-dependent binding of recoverin to membranes monitored by surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy in real time. Biochemistry 36, 12019–12026. doi: 10.1021/bi970938d
Leung, Y. T., Fain, G. L., and Matthews, H. R. (2007). Simultaneous measurement of current and calcium in the ultraviolet-sensitive cones of zebrafish. J. Physiol. 579, 15–27. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.120162
Lim, S., Scholten, A., Manchala, G., Cudia, D., Zlomke-Sell, S. K., Koch, K.-W., et al. (2017). Structural characterization of ferrous ion binding to retinal guanylate cyclase activator protein-5 from zebrafish photoreceptors. Biochemistry 56, 6652–6661. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b01029
Makino, C. L., Dodd, R. L., Chen, J., Burns, M. E., Roca, A., Simon, M. I., et al. (2004). Recoverin regulates light-dependent phosphodiesterase activity in retinal rods. J. Gen. Physiol. 123, 729–741. doi: 10.1085/jgp.200308994
Marino, V., Astegno, A., Pedroni, M., Piccinelli, F., and Dell’Orco, D. (2014). Nanodevice-induced conformational and functional changes in a prototypical calcium sensor protein. Nanoscale 6, 412–423. doi: 10.1039/c3nr04978g
Palczewski, K., Sokal, I., and Baehr, W. (2004). Guanylate cyclase-activating proteins: structure, function, and diversity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 322, 1123–1130. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.07.122
Permyakov, S. E., Cherskaya, A. M., Senin, I. I., Zargarov, A. A., Shulga-Morskoy, S. V., Alekseev, A. M., et al. (2000). Effects of mutations in the calcium-binding sites of recoverin on its calcium affinity: evidence for successive filling of the calcium binding sites. Protein Eng. 13, 783–790. doi: 10.1093/protein/13.11.783
Potvin-Fournier, K., Lefèvre, T., Picard-Lafond, A., Marcotte, C., Dufresne, C., Cantin, L., et al. (2016). Discriminating lipid- from protein-calcium binding to understand the interaction between recoverin and phosphatidylglycerol model membranes. Biochemistry 55, 3481–3491. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.6b00408
Potvin-Fournier, K., Valois-Paillard, G., Lefèvre, T., Cantin, L., Salesse, C., and Auger, M. (2017). Membrane fluidity is a driving force for recoverin myristoyl immobilization in zwitterionic lipids. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 490, 1268–1273. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc
Rätscho, N., Scholten, A., and Koch, K. W. (2009). Expression profiles of three novel sensory guanylate cyclases and guanylate cyclase-activating proteins in the zebrafish retina. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1793, 1110–1114. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.12.021
Rinner, O., Makhankov, Y. V., Biehlmaier, O., and Neuhauss, S. C. (2005). Knockdown of cone-specific kinase GRK7 in larval zebrafish leads to impaired cone response recovery and delayed dark adaptation. Neuron 47, 231–242. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.06.010
Sampath, A. P., Strissel, K. J., Elias, R., Arshavsky, V. Y., McGinnis, J. F., Chen, J., et al. (2005). Recoverin improves rod-mediated vision by enhancing signal transmission in the mouse retina. Neuron 46, 413–420. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.04.006
Scholten, A., and Koch, K. W. (2011). Differential calcium signaling by cone specific guanylate cyclase-activating proteins from the zebrafish retina. PLoS One 6:e23117. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023117
Senin, I. I., Fischer, T., Komolov, K. E., Zinchenko, D. V., Philippov, P. P., and Koch, K. W. (2002). Ca2+-myristoyl switch in the neuronal calcium sensor recoverin requires different functions of Ca2+-binding sites. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 50365–50372. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M204338200
Senin, I. I., Zargarov, A. A., Alekseev, A. M., Gorodovikova, E. N., Lipkin, V. M., and Philippov, P. P. (1995). N-myristoylation of recoverin enhances its efficiency as an inhibitor of rhodopsin kinase. FEBS Lett. 376, 87–90. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(95)01187-2
Spilker, C., Dresbach, T., and Braunewell, K. H. (2002). Reversible translocation and activity-dependent localization of the calcium-myristoyl switch protein VILIP-1 to different membrane compartments in living hippocampal neurons. J. Neurosci. 22, 7331–7339. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-17-07331.2002
Spilker, C., Richter, K., Smalla, K. H., Manahan-Vaughan, D., Gundelfinger, E. D., and Braunewell, K. H. (2000). The neuronal EF-hand calcium-binding protein visinin-like protein-3 is expressed in cerebellar Purkinje cells and shows a calcium-dependent membrane association. Neuroscience 96, 121–129. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4522(99)00536-9
Sulmann, S., Dell´Orco, D., Marino, V., Behnen, P., and Koch, K.-W. (2014). Conformational changes in calcium-sensor proteins under molecular crowding conditions. Chem. Eur. J. 20, 6756–6762. doi: 10.1002/chem.201402146
Sulmann, S., Vocke, F., Scholten, A., and Koch, K. W. (2015). Retina specific GCAPs in zebrafish acquire functional selectivity in Ca2+-sensing by myristoylation and Mg2+-binding. Sci. Rep. 5:11228. doi: 10.1038/srep11228
Tanaka, T., Ames, J. B., Harvey, T. S., Stryer, L., and Ikura, M. (1995). Sequestration of the membrane-targeting myristoyl group of recoverin in the calcium-free state. Nature 376, 444–447. doi: 10.1038/376444a0
Timr,Š, Kadlec, J., Srb, P., Ollila, O. H. S., and Jungwirth, P. (2018). Calcium sensing by recoverin: effect of protein conformation on ion affinity. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9, 1613–1619. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b00495
Timr,Š, Pleskot, R., Kadlec, J., Kohagen, M., Magarkar, A., and Jungwirth, P. (2017). Membrane binding of recoverin: from mechanistic understanding to biological functionality. ACS Cent. Sci. 3, 868–874. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.7b00210
Wada, Y., Sugiyama, J., Okano, T., and Fukada, Y. (2006). GRK1 and GRK7: unique cellular distribution and widely different activities of opsin phosphorylation in the zebrafish rods and cones. J. Neurochem. 98, 824–837. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.03920.x
Weiergräber, O., Senin, I. I., Zernii, E. Y., Churumova, V. A., Kovaleva, N. A., Nazipova, A. A., et al. (2006). Tuning of a neuronal calcium sensor. J. Biol.Chem. 281, 37594–37602. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M603700200
Weiergräber, O. H., Senin, I. I., Philippov, P. P., Granzin, J., and Koch, K.-W. (2003). Impact of N-terminal myristoylation on the Ca2+-dependent conformational transition in recoverin. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 22972–22979. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M300447200
Yang, S. T., Lim, S. I., Kiessling, V., Kwon, I., and Tamm, L. K. (2016). Site-specific fluorescent labeling to visualize membrane translocation of a myristoyl switch protein. Sci. Rep. 6:32866. doi: 10.1038/srep32866
Keywords: recoverin, photoreceptor, calcium-switch, conformational change, zebrafish
Citation: Elbers D, Scholten A and Koch K-W (2018) Zebrafish Recoverin Isoforms Display Differences in Calcium Switch Mechanisms. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 11:355. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2018.00355
Received: 24 July 2018; Accepted: 11 September 2018;
Published: 28 September 2018.
Edited by:Clint L. Makino, Boston University, United States
Reviewed by:Sadaharu Miyazono, Asahikawa Medical University, Japan
Polina Geva, Boston University, United States
Ching-Kang Jason Chen, Baylor College of Medicine, United States
Copyright © 2018 Elbers, Scholten and Koch. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Karl-Wilhelm Koch, firstname.lastname@example.org