Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

EDITORIAL article

Front. Mol. Neurosci., 29 July 2025

Sec. Molecular Signalling and Pathways

Volume 18 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2025.1654457

This article is part of the Research TopicPathobiological Defects in Sensorineural Hearing Loss: From Identification to RescueView all 6 articles

Editorial: Pathobiological defects in sensorineural hearing loss: from identification to rescue

  • 1Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
  • 2Bioacoustics Research Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience-DNS, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
  • 3Stanford University Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford, CA, United States
  • 4Stanford University Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford, CA, United States
  • 5Stanford University Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford, CA, United States

Hearing loss is the most common sensory impairment, affecting around 1 in 1,000 newborns (Koffler et al., 2015; Morton and Nance, 2006). This condition profoundly affects the development of language skills and impacts cognitive development (Niparko et al., 2010; Tomblin et al., 2015). Timely diagnosis is essential, yet hearing loss can lead to permanent effects even if identified. The causes of hearing impairment are complex and multifactorial, involving genetic mutations, ototoxicity and environmental influences (Korver et al., 2017; Le et al., 2017; Fink, 2024). Genetic factors play an essential role in hearing loss, with mutations in genes such as SLC26A4, GJB2, and POU3F4 being among the primary causes of hereditary deafness (Busi et al., 2012; Bernardinelli et al., 2022, 2025b; Sklenar et al., 2025). Furthermore, mitochondrial DNA mutations, such as A1555G and T961G in the MTRNR1 gene, have been associated with aminoglycoside-induced deafness (Guaran et al., 2013; Castiglione et al., 2013). The Kir4.1 potassium channel, encoded by the KCNJ10 gene, is essential for maintaining endocochlear potential, and its dysfunction is associated with various syndromes (Fracaro et al., 2024). Understanding these genetic factors is crucial for developing targeted therapies and enhancing genetic counseling.

The auditory system comprises highly specialized cell types that convert sound waves into electrical impulses (Jeong et al., 2022). The development and homeostasis of the hearing organ involve numerous molecular players, including transcription factors, ion channels, transporters, structural proteins and enzymes. Any alteration of these tightly regulated molecular mechanisms can lead to varying degrees of hearing impairment (Schwander et al., 2010). Many hearing defects originate during embryogenesis when structural malformations occur (Sennaroglu and Bajin, 2017), which result in permanent alterations to the structure of the inner ear and cannot be rectified once occurred.

Current therapeutic options for hearing loss include hearing aids and cochlear implants, but not all patients benefit from these (Le et al., 2017). As a result, research is focusing on strategies to address developmental abnormalities leading to hearing loss (Li et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2024). In certain instances, a pharmacological intervention can be considered to restore the function and expression of a specific target protein (Bernardinelli et al., 2025a). Additionally, tissue engineering and 3D printing are transforming auricular reconstruction for patients with microtia, enhancing aesthetics and auditory function (Hellies et al., 2025).

The latest advancements in hearing loss research have revealed various aspects of auditory function and dysfunction. For instance, Bieniussa et al. analyzed how Stat3 contributes to the development and differentiation of mouse hair cells. Their findings revealed that Stat3 knockout in outer hair cells (OHCs) led to increased distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) levels and higher hearing thresholds. These defects were associated with increased pro-inflammatory activity, including up-regulation of the NF-kB pathway and increased cytokine production. When Stat3 was knocked out in supporting cells, similar hearing defects were observed and they were linked to cytoskeletal instability. The upregulation of pro-inflammatory pathways and cytoskeletal instability in Stat3-deficient mice provides new targets for therapeutic interventions. This research enhances our understanding of cochlear homeostasis, highlighting the potential of modulating Stat3 activity as a novel approach to preserving hearing function.

Advancements in imaging techniques have enhanced our ability to visualize the structures and functions of the cochlea. Schulz-Hildebrandt et al. describe an advancement of optical coherence tomography (OCT). They introduced a dynamic imaging component, enabling real-time tracking of metabolic activity by monitoring ATP-dependent intracellular motion. This innovation reduces acquisition time and minimizes potential damage to the cochlear structure while allowing visualization of individual cochlear cells (Iyer et al., 2016). This technical breakthrough has far-reaching implications for both research and clinical applications. The ability to monitor ATP-dependent intracellular motion non-invasively opens new possibilities for studying cochlear pathophysiology in vivo. This technology could revolutionize our approach to diagnosing and treatment by providing unprecedented insights into cellular dynamics within the living cochlea.

The role of cellular stress in hearing loss has also been a recent research focus. Li et al. explored the role of endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS) in SNHL. The accumulation of misfolded proteins within the ER triggers the unfolded protein response (UPR), which can activate inflammatory pathways, oxidative stress responses, autophagy and cell death, eventually contributing to the development of SNHL. The review discusses potential pharmacological interventions to enhance cell survival by modulating ER stress. This work provides a cohesive framework by clarifying the intricate role of ERS and UPR in several types of hearing loss. They discuss potential pharmacological interventions targeting ERS pathways, such as Salubrinal, Pitavastatin and Tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA), opening promising new avenues for developing therapeutic strategies that could revolutionize the treatment of SNHL.

Focusing on synaptic transmission in the auditory pathway, Chen et al. investigated otoferlin, a protein crucial for synaptic function in auditory hair cells. By introducing mutations in key amino acids within the C2F domain, they demonstrated that the mutated otoferlin protein accumulated in the Golgi apparatus, failing to reach the basolateral membrane of inner hair cells. Although calcium influx was not affected, calcium-triggered exocytosis of synaptic vesicles was significantly impaired. The researchers identified a key mechanism in auditory signal transduction by showing that specific mutations in this domain of the protein otoferlin can cause severe deafness while leaving hair cell morphology unchanged. The accumulation of mutated otoferlin in the Golgi apparatus, coupled with impaired calcium-triggered exocytosis, provides a link between protein trafficking, synaptic function and hearing ability. This study therefore provides novel insights into the mechanisms of synaptic transmission within the auditory system, supporting the ongoing otoferlin gene therapy trials to restore auditory function.

The development of the inner ear is a tightly orchestrated process and, as a prevalent pathomechanism leading to hearing loss, it is an area of intense study. Ito et al. explored the role of the anion exchanger pendrin (Slc26a4) in the development of the bony labyrinth and in the otoconial mineralization. Slc26a4-deficient mice exhibited incomplete partition of the cochlea, enlarged vestibular aqueduct and impaired endolymphatic fluid reabsorption, associated with larger otoconia in the utricle and a near absence in the saccule, leading to the commonly observed vestibular dysfunction. These findings underscore the essential role of specific genes in the proper formation and function of the inner ear, bridging the gap between genetic mutations and phenotypic outcomes, and paving the way for potential therapeutic interventions targeting the SLC26A4 pathway.

In conclusion, recent research has markedly advanced our understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms that underlie hearing loss. Studies on Stat3, otoferlin and ER stress have provided valuable information on the genetic and biochemical factors influencing auditory function. In addition, innovations in cochlear imaging and investigations into inner ear development are promising to improve diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Although significant progress has been made, further research is necessary to refine treatment approaches and develop effective interventions for preventing and managing hearing loss. Hearing disorders' complexity necessitates a multidisciplinary strategy that integrates genetics, molecular biology, physiology, optical imaging and clinical medicine to tackle this common sensory impairment. The studies presented in this Research Topic collectively represent significant milestones in hearing research, each contributing unique and valuable insights into the intricate mechanisms that underlie auditory function and dysfunction, while shaping future diagnosis and therapy.

Author contributions

EB: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. LA: Writing – review & editing. KS: Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Bernardinelli, E., Jamontas, R., Matulevicius, A., Huber, F., Nasser, H., Klaus, S., et al. (2025a). Inhibitors of the ubiquitin-proteasome system rescue cellular levels and ion transport function of pathogenic pendrin (SLC26A4) protein variants. Int. J. Mol. Med. 55:69. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2025.5510

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bernardinelli, E., Liuni, R., Jamontas, R., Tesolin, P., Morgan, A., Girotto, G., et al. (2025b). Novel genetic determinants contribute to hearing loss in a central European cohort with enlarged vestibular aqueduct. Mol. Med. 31:111. doi: 10.1186/s10020-025-01159-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bernardinelli, E., Roesch, S., Simoni, E., Marino, A., Rasp, G., Astolfi, L., et al. (2022). Novel POU3F4 variants identified in patients with inner ear malformations exhibit aberrant cellular distribution and lack of SLC6A20 transcriptional upregulation. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 15:999833. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2022.999833

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Busi, M., Castiglione, A., Taddei Masieri, M., Ravani, A., Guaran, V., Astolfi, L., et al. (2012). Novel mutations in the SLC26A4 gene. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 76, 1249–1254. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.05.014

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Castiglione, A., Guaran, V., Astolfi, L., Orioli, E., Zeri, G., Gemmati, D., et al. (2013). Karyotype-phenotype correlation in partial trisomies of the short arm of chromosome 6: a family case report and review of the literature. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 141, 243–259. doi: 10.1159/000353846

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Fink, D. (2024). Age-related hearing loss. N. Engl. J. Med. 391, 95–96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2406363

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Fracaro, S., Hellies, F., Marioni, G., Brotto, D., Franchella, S., Zanoletti, E., et al. (2024). Role of Kir4.1 channel in auditory function: impact on endocochlear potential and hearing loss. Appl. Sci-Basel. 14:4985. doi: 10.3390/app14124985

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Guaran, V., Astolfi, L., Castiglione, A., Simoni, E., Olivetto, E., Galasso, M., et al. (2013). Association between idiopathic hearing loss and mitochondrial DNA mutations: a study on 169 hearing-impaired subjects. Int. J. Mol. Med. 32, 785–794. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2013.1470

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hellies, F., Fracaro, S., Marioni, G., Trotta, A., Todesco, M., Casarin, M., et al. (2025). Systematic review on microtia: current knowledge and future directions. Children 12:411. doi: 10.3390/children12040411

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Iyer, J. S., Batts, S. A., Chu, K. K., Sahin, M. I., Leung, H. M., Tearney, G. J., et al. (2016). Micro-optical coherence tomography of the mammalian cochlea. Sci. Rep. 6:33288. doi: 10.1038/srep33288

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Jeong, H., Clark, S., Goehring, A., Dehghani-Ghahnaviyeh, S., Rasouli, A., Tajkhorshid, E., et al. (2022). Structures of the TMC-1 complex illuminate mechanosensory transduction. Nature 610, 796–803. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05314-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Koffler, T., Ushakov, K., and Avraham, K. B. (2015). Genetics of hearing loss: syndromic. Otolaryngol. Clin. North Am. 48, 1041–1061. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2015.07.007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Korver, A. M., Smith, R. J., Van Camp, G., Schleiss, M. R., Bitner-Glindzicz, M. A., Lustig, L. R., et al. (2017). Congenital hearing loss. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 3:16094. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.94

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Le, T. N., Straatman, L. V., Lea, J., and Westerberg, B. (2017). Current insights in noise-induced hearing loss: a literature review of the underlying mechanism, pathophysiology, asymmetry, and management options. J. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 46:41. doi: 10.1186/s40463-017-0219-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, X., Sanneman, J. D., Harbidge, D. G., Zhou, F., Ito, T., Nelson, R., et al. (2013). SLC26A4 targeted to the endolymphatic sac rescues hearing and balance in Slc26a4 mutant mice. PLoS Genet. 9:e1003641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003641

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Morton, C. C., and Nance, W. E. (2006). Newborn hearing screening–a silent revolution. N. Engl. J. Med. 354, 2151–2164. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra050700

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Niparko, J. K., Tobey, E. A., Thal, D. J., Eisenberg, L. S., Wang, N. Y., Quittner, A. L., et al. (2010). Spoken language development in children following cochlear implantation. JAMA. 303, 1498–1506. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.451

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Schwander, M., Kachar, B., and Müller, U. (2010). The cell biology of hearing. J. Cell Biol. 190, 9–20. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201001138

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sennaroglu, L., and Bajin, M. D. (2017). Classification and current management of inner ear malformations. Balkan Med. J. 34, 397–411. doi: 10.4274/balkanmedj.2017.0367

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sklenar, M., Borecka, S., Varga, L., Bernardinelli, E., Stanik, J., Skopkova, M., et al. (2025). Genetic heterogeneity in patients with enlarged vestibular aqueduct and pendred syndrome. Mol. Med. 31:208. doi: 10.1186/s10020-025-01262-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Tomblin, J. B., Harrison, M., Ambrose, S. E., Walker, E. A., Oleson, J. J., Moeller, M. P., et al. (2015). Language outcomes in young children with mild to severe hearing loss. Ear Hear. 36:76S−91S. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000219

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, H., Chen, Y., Lv, J., Cheng, X., Cao, Q., Wang, D., et al. (2024). Bilateral gene therapy in children with autosomal recessive deafness 9: single-arm trial results. Nat. Med. 30, 1898–1904. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03023-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: hearing loss, prevention, diagnosis, sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), rescue

Citation: Bernardinelli E, Astolfi L and Stankovic KM (2025) Editorial: Pathobiological defects in sensorineural hearing loss: from identification to rescue. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 18:1654457. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2025.1654457

Received: 26 June 2025; Accepted: 15 July 2025;
Published: 29 July 2025.

Edited and reviewed by: Jean-Marc Taymans, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), France

Copyright © 2025 Bernardinelli, Astolfi and Stankovic. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Emanuele Bernardinelli, ZS5iZXJuYXJkaW5lbGxpQHBtdS5hYy5hdA==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.