Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Oncol.
Sec. Breast Cancer
Volume 14 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1394116

Vacuum Assisted Excision (VAE): a safe minimally invasive option for benign Phyllodes Tumor Diagnosis and Treatment, a systematic review and metanalysis

Provisionally accepted
Maria L. Gil Maria L. Gil 1Bertha Andrade Coelho Bertha Andrade Coelho 2,3Henrique L. Couto Henrique L. Couto 2,4,5*Henrique M. Silva Henrique M. Silva 1Eduardo C. Pessoa Eduardo C. Pessoa 5,6,7Nisha Sharma Nisha Sharma 8Ritse Mann Ritse Mann 9Stuart A. Mcintosh Stuart A. Mcintosh 10Paulo Diniz Paulo Diniz 1,11Farley S. Cantidio Farley S. Cantidio 1Gabriel O. Gil Gabriel O. Gil 1Anna D. Salvador Anna D. Salvador 1Waldeir J. Almeida Júnior Waldeir J. Almeida Júnior 1José T. Avelar José T. Avelar 1Cláudia L. Laranjeiras Cláudia L. Laranjeiras 1Agnaldo L. Silva Filho Agnaldo L. Silva Filho 12,13,5
  • 1 Materdei Hospital, Belo Horizonte, Mato Grosso, Brazil
  • 2 Brazilian Society of Mastology, Belo Horizonte, Mato Grosso, Brazil
  • 3 UNIFIMOC University Center, Montes Claros, Brazil
  • 4 Redimama - Redimasto Breast Unit., Belo Horizonte, Mato Grosso, Brazil
  • 5 Brazilian Federation of Associations of Gynecologists and Obstetricians, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • 6 Brazilian Society Mastology, São Paulo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
  • 7 Faculty of Medicine, Sao Paulo State University, Botucatu, Brazil
  • 8 Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
  • 9 Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdan, Netherlands
  • 10 The Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
  • 11 Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Mato Grosso, Brazil
  • 12 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Botucatu Medical School, Sao Paulo State University-UNESP, Botucatu,, Botucatu, Brazil
  • 13 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    this is a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing surgical excision and percutaneous ultrasound-guided vacuum assisted excision (US-VAE) for treatment of benign phyllodes tumor (PT) using local recurrence (LR) as the endpoint.Objective: To determine the frequency of LR of benign PT after US-VAE compared to the frequency of LR after surgical excision.Method: Systematic review and meta-analysis (following the PRISMA standard) comparing LR in women older than 18 years old treated for benign PT by US-VAE compared with local surgical excision, with at least 12 months follow up. Studies were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Embase. The pooled effect measure used was the odds ratio (OR) of recurrence.Results: Five comparative prospective or retrospective observational studies published between 01/01/1992 and 01/10/2022, comparing surgical excision and percutaneous ultrasound-guided vacuum assisted excision (US-VAE) for local recurrence (LR) of benign phyllodes tumor (PT) met the selection criteria. Four were retrospective observational cohorts and one was a prospective observational cohort. In total 778 women were followed. Of these, 439 (56,4%) underwent local surgical excision and 339 (43,6%) patients had US-VAE. The median age of patients in the 5 studies ranged from 33,7 to 39 years old; the median size ranged from 1,5cm to 3,0cm and the median follow up ranged from 12 to 46,6 months. Needle gauge ranged from 7G to 11G. LR rates were not statically significant between US-VAE and surgical excision (41 of 339 versus 34 of 439; OR 1.3; p = 0.29).Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that using US-VAE for removal of benign PT does not increase local regional recurrence and is a safe minimally invasive therapeutic option.

    Keywords: Phyllodes Tumor, vacuum-assisted excision, Vacuum-assisted biopsy, Local recurrence, Meta-analysis, review

    Received: 01 Mar 2024; Accepted: 16 Apr 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Gil, Andrade Coelho, Couto, Silva, Pessoa, Sharma, Mann, Mcintosh, Diniz, Cantidio, Gil, Salvador, Almeida Júnior, Avelar, Laranjeiras and Silva Filho. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Henrique L. Couto, Brazilian Society of Mastology, Belo Horizonte, Mato Grosso, Brazil

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.