Skip to main content

BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article

Front. Transplant., 01 November 2023
Sec. Abdominal Transplantation
Volume 2 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/frtra.2023.1280454

Outcomes of liver transplantation with thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion: a matched-controlled initial experience in Spain

Luis Secanella1* Felipe Alconchel2 Javier López-Monclús3 Enrique Toledo-Martínez4 Oriana Barrios1 Pablo Ramírez2 Manuel Cecilio Jiménez-Garrido3 Juan Carlos Rodríguez-Sanjuán4 Mario Royo-Villanova5 Gabriel Moreno-González6 Laura Lladó1
  • 1Unidad HPB y Trasplante Hepático, Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestiva, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
  • 2Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca (IMIB-Virgen de la Arrixaca), Murcia, Spain
  • 3Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Unidad de Trasplante Hepático, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
  • 4Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
  • 5Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Coordinación de Trasplantes, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca (IMIB-Virgen de la Arrixaca), Murcia, Spain
  • 6Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Coordinación de Trasplantes, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain

Thoracoabdominal (TA) normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) should allow the safe recovery of heart and liver grafts simultaneously in the context of controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD). We present the initial results of cDCD liver transplantation with simultaneous liver and heart procurement in Spain until October 2021. Outcomes were compared with a matched cohort of cDCD with abdominal NRP (A-NRP) from participating institutions. Primary endpoints comprised early allograft dysfunction (EAD) or primary non-function (PNF), and the development of ischemic-type biliary lesions (ITBL). Six transplants were performed using cDCD with TA-NRP during the study period. Donors were significantly younger in the TA-NRP group than in the A-NRP group (median 45.6 years and 62.9 years respectively, p = 0.011), with a median functional warm ischemia time of 12.5 min in the study group and 13 min in the control group. Patient characteristics, procurement times, and surgical baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between groups. No patient in the study group developed EAD or PNF, and over a median follow-up of 9.8 months, none developed ITBL or graft loss. Extending A-NRP to TA-NRP for cardiac procurement may be technically challenging, but it is both feasible and safe, showing comparable postoperative outcomes to A-NRP.

1. Introduction

Intending to solve the organ shortage in the donor pool, the number of controlled donations after circulatory death (cDCD) has increased over the last decade (1). After the withdrawal of mechanical ventilation (WMV) and a period of warm ischemia, livers are traditionally, recovered by rapid in-situ cold preservation, using the so-called super rapid recovery (SRR). However, this procurement method has been associated with a high incidence of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) and ischemic-type biliary lesions (ITBL) (2). Although limiting risk factors, such as donor age, warm ischemia, and cold ischemia, have improved these results (3), global outcomes remained worse than with donation after brain death (DBD), especially for primary non-function (PNF), re-transplantation, and biliary complication rates (4). Abdominal normothermic regional perfusion (A-NRP) has emerged as a useful tool to obtain liver grafts safely from cDCD donors by recovering liver function after a warm ischemia time (WIT) and allowing this function to be checked before transplantation (5). Heart transplantation teams have therefore proposed that we can expand the donor pool through cDCD. Contrary to the requirements of the lungs, the heart requires reoxygenation for its functional recovery and evaluation (6). Extending A-NRP to thoracoabdominal NRP (TA-NRP) can lead to short periods of uncontrolled warm ischemia, especially during the assessment of the heart, and can increase the risk of biliary damage. Thus, extension to TA-NRP concerns liver transplantation teams. Although several series have reported on heart transplants from cDCD, little has been reported on the outcomes of liver grafts recovered with hearts (7).

We aimed to compare the initial experience of liver outcomes in Spain following the simultaneous procurement of livers and hearts by cDCD using TA-NRP, compared with a matched cohort of livers recovered using A-NRP.

2. Methods

2.1. Study design

In this retrospective multicentric study, we evaluated the short- and long-term outcomes of livers recovered from all cDCDs by TA-NRP for simultaneous heart recovery. The study was conducted in Spain from January 2020 to October 2021 and included a minimum of 6 months follow-up. As a control group, we evaluated the outcomes of livers obtained from cDCD donors immediately before and after each case at the same institution. An institutional review board approved the study (PR425/21).

2.2. Donors

We considered all neurocritical patients as potential cDCD donors if they had a Glasgow Coma Scale score <5 points or their intensive care physicians considered the coma irreversible. After team evaluation and explanation to the family, we obtained informed consent for donation and premortem interventions according to the Spanish regulatory framework. This included the need for the following: heparinization (500–600 UI/kg); percutaneous (or surgical) cannulation of the femoral artery and vein; placement of an occlusive aortic balloon in the supraceliac aorta through the contralateral femoral artery to ensure isolation of abdominal perfusion during A-NRP; (8) and arterial line monitoring, usually in the left arterial artery, to ensure blockage of the supra-aortic branches during recovery (9). The functional WIT (WIT) starts when systolic blood pressure falls below 60 mmHg, followed by a mandatory 5-minute non-touch period once the blood pressure becomes undetectable. Death is then determined, and recovery procedures can start.

2.3. Normothermic regional perfusion

NRP takes 60–120 min to complete. After the declaration of death, the aortic balloon is filled, A-NRP starts, and cardiac surgeons perform a rapid sternotomy and dissection of the supra-aortic branches to clamp them (10). At that point, the aortic balloon is deflated and NRP is extended to the thoracic organs. To avoid cerebral oxygenation from collateral vessels of the thoracic aorta, the cephalad ends of each aortic arch vessel are cannulated and drained blood is returned to the venous reservoir for retransfusion (11). Once the heart spontaneously reverts to sinus rhythm, TA-NRP is weaned or decreased to <1 L/min according to the local protocol. Heart function is assessed by transesophageal echocardiography, Swan-Ganz catheter, and direct visual inspection. If the heart graft is accepted, the cardiac recipient surgery starts and once prepared, the aortic balloon is re-filled, or the thoracic aorta is clamped with the inferior cava to maintain A-NRP while the heart graft is retrieved under cold preservation. Blood samples are taken every 30 min from starting NRP to assess aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), lactate, and hematocrit levels.

In this initial series for the validation of the technique, we accepted livers as transplantable grafts if they met the following criteria: warm ischemia time <30 min, transaminases peak <3 times normal value, cardiac weaning with minimal vasoactive drugs requirements and without venous overload, and good macroscopic aspect of the liver during the procedure, with excellent cold perfusion.

2.4. Outcome data

Data were obtained from the liver transplantation registry at each center. We collected clinical data about both the donor and recipient, including age, sex, transplant indication, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, comorbidities, body mass index, pre-WMV intensive care unit (ICU) duration, vasoactive drugs use, laboratory liver function parameters, cause of death, and cannulation timing (premortem, pre-WMV, or postmortem, after the declaration of death). We also recorded details of the procurement and implantation procedures, such as total WIT (from WLST to the start of organ preservation), functional WIT (from donor systolic blood pressure <60 mmHg to the onset of organ preservation), NRP time, vasoactive drugs use during NRP, transaminase and lactate values during NRP, cold ischemia time (CIT), implantation time, piggy-back use, blood component transfusion, and anastomosis types (portal, arterial, and biliary). Finally, we reported postoperative outcomes, such as time for extubation, ICU stay, liver function (on days 1, 3, 5, and 7), arterial and biliary complications, reintervention, early graft loss or re-transplantation, mortality at 90 days, and long-term patient and graft survival.

Each patient who received a liver graft by TA-NRP cDCD was matched with two patients who received liver grafts by A-NRP cDCD at each center (the patient before and after each).

Our primary endpoint was the incidence of EAD and non-anastomotic cholangiopathy. We defined EAD according to the Olthoff criteria (12) and non-anastomotic cholangiopathy as the presence of non-anastomotic biliary strictures (in the absence of arterial thrombosis or stenosis) on magnetic resonance cholangiography performed 1 month after liver transplantation and repeated when clinically indicated during follow-up.

2.5. Statistical analysis

Categorical variables are presented as absolute numbers and percentages, whereas continuous variables are presented as medians and interquartile ranges (IQR). We compared the TA-NRP and A-NRP groups by χ2 or Fisher's F for categorical variables and by Mann–Whitney U or Student t-test for continuous ones. Patient and graft survival is assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata® 13.1 (StataCorp®, 4905 Lakeway Drive, College Station, Texas 77845 USA).

3. Results

The four participating centers in Spain performed six liver transplantations using TA-NRP for grafts obtained from cDCD donors during the study period (Table 1). This included one patient each from Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge (Barcelona), Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla (Santander), and Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro (Madrid), and three patients from Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca (Murcia). Most donors were young (age <50 years, n = 5; 83%) and were not overweight or obese (body mass index <25 kg/m2, n = 5; 83%). All cases underwent premortem canulation and had short functional WITs (<20 min). We selected 12 liver transplantations with grafts obtained by A-NRP from cDCD as controls.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Main features of liver transplantations from cDCD donors with TA-NRP for simultaneous heart donation.

3.1. Description of the series

Table 2 summarizes the descriptive analyses for the donors and recipients, together with technical issues. TA-NRP donors were significantly younger than A-NRP donors (median 45.6 vs. 62.9 years, respectively, p = 0.01) and had fewer comorbidities. No statistically significant differences existed between recipients, though we did observe a trend to allocate TA-NRP grafts to recipients with less comorbidity, and no differences existed in the WIT, CIT, or arterial ischemia time. Although we observed higher AST and ALT values in TA-NRP donors, these were not statistically significant (Figure 1 and Supplementary Table S1). The lactate curve was also comparable between groups, even during the weaning period. Postoperative liver function tests were optimal, with ALT and AST showing median peaks of <400 IU/L and rapid recovery of international normalized ratios (Figure 2 and Supplementary Table S2).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Descriptive analysis of the A-NRP and TA-NRP groups.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Evolution of AST (A), ALT (B) and lactate (C) during NRP. Note that transaminases levels tend to be higher in the TA-NRP group, specially before the first 30 min, once the weaning period has started.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Postoperative evolution of transaminases (A,B), bilirrubine (C) and INR (D). The peak of transaminases occurred within the first 24 h post-transplantation, with a median of less than 400 IU/L. There were no differences in liver function recovery between TA-NRP and A-NRP groups.

3.2. Short-term outcomes

No patient developed EAD. One patient died on day nine from uncontrolled sepsis due to multi-resistant klebsiella species (the only early graft loss) and one patient required reoperation due to a biliary leak. However, five patients developed biliary complications (27.8%): four leaks (two in the TA-NRP group [33.3%] and two in the A-NRP group [16.7%]; p = 0.18), and 1 anastomotic stricture (5.6%) in the TA-NRP group (17.6%). The stricture was initially managed endoscopically, but it required a bilioenteric anastomosis in month eight.

3.3. Follow-up

Over a median follow-up of 9.8 months, the TA-NRP group experienced no mortality, graft losses, or non-anastomotic biliary strictures, but the A-NRP group had a graft lost due to ischemic cholangiopathy that needed re-transplantation in month seven (the same patient who needed reoperation for a biliary leak).

4. Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first description and comparison of liver transplantation's short- and long-term outcomes using TA-NRP from cDCD with simultaneous heart recovery. This initial series of six transplantations in Spain revealed no EAD, mortality, graft loss, or ischemic cholangiopathy in the early post-transplantation period.

4.1. Normothermic regional perfusion in cDCD

The use of NRP in cDCD has reduced the high incidence of EAD/PNF and ischemic cholangiopathy classically associated with this type of donation. In a recent report of a Spanish national series comparing NRP with classic procurement by static cold storage (SCS) after asystole, the NRP group had significantly less EAD (81/545; 15%) compared with the SRR group (60/258; 23%), as well as fewer ischemic-type biliary lesions (6/545 [1%] vs. 24/258 [9%], respectively) (13). Furthermore, the incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis, re-transplantation, graft loss, and death, but not PNF, were significantly better in the NRP group. The Cambridge group also recently published a comparative study between SCS, NRP, and normothermic machine perfusion (NMP), reporting EAD in 21% of SCS procedures (19/97), which was non-significantly worse than for NRP (10/69; 14%) or NMP (7/67; 11%); non-anastomotic biliary strictures were also significantly more frequent in the SCS and NMP groups (22/97; 25%) than in the NRP group (12/67; 19%) (14). In the present series, we observed no allograft dysfunction, early re-transplantation, or ischemic cholangiopathy, having median ALT and AST peaks of 304.5 (max.1690) IU/L and 361.5 (max. 2,870) IU/L within the first week, respectively These results are consistent with the benchmarks for liver transplantation at 6 months (<20% biliary complications and <9% graft loss) (13). A meta-analysis published by De Beule et al. showed a lowered risk of EAD with NRP compared with in-situ cold preservation (RR 0.44; 95% CI 0.26–0.76) (15). Other strategies have been proposed to optimize livers from cDCD, such as ex-situ oxygenated perfusion (14), but those techniques are not established in Spain.

4.2. Thoraco-abdominal normothermic regional perfusion

When TA-NRP is proposed for liver and heart procurement, the two main concerns are prolonged WIT and the liver response to weaning NRP when checking heart function. In our series, the median functional WIT for TA-NRP was 12.5 min, comparable to that in the A-NRP group (13 min, p = 0.81), and lower than in other series with A-NRP. We consider that the use of premortem cannulation (cannulation before the withdrawal of ventilation) and a non-touch period of 5 min, coupled with the expertise of the cardiothoracic surgeons, produced this efficiency. The Spanish national experience in 2016, described by Hessheimer et al., reported a functional WIT of 19 min for postmortem cannulation and 12 min for premortem cannulation (16), with 3% of livers discarded due to altered laboratory values (21/775). In an international study by Muller et al., which compared outcomes between hypothermic static and oxygenated perfusion and NRP from cDCD, the functional WIT in the French group was 22 min with postmortem cannulation once femoral guidewires were pre-placed (17). Of the 226 donors in which NRP was initiated, 12 had to be discarded (12%) due to biochemical evolution during NRP, with ALT or AST levels increasing to over four times the normal limits. Experience with postmortem cannulation in the UK, described by Watson et al., reported no data about functional WIT, but did report the sole asystolic period to be 16 min and that 7% of donor's livers were discarded because of rising ALT or AST during NRP (18).

Although heart procurement by TA-NRP is well-established, especially in the UK, we know little of the outcomes of liver transplantation by TA-NRP from cDCD. The initial Spanish experience with heart procurement using TA-NRP has recently been published (10). This described four hearts transplanted successfully from young donors (age <45 years) with functional WITs between 8 and 16 min, fast restoration of spontaneous sinus rhythm (<1 min), and only two requiring low doses of vasoactive drugs. However, there has been only limited information about liver grafts in this context, with several procurement techniques described (19).

The UK experience included ten livers and nine hearts obtained by TA-NRP but does not report specific information about those livers (18). Croome and Daneshmand described their first experience with the combined procurement of three hearts and livers (20). They used SRR for the liver and isolated the thorax and abdomen by clamping the suprahepatic IVC and supraceliac aorta in the abdomen, then recovered the hearts and put them on the OCS Heart System in the context of a clinical trial. Although the procedure is described in detail, they provide no information about the outcomes of liver transplantation. Finally, Sellers et al. published the outcomes of 13 liver transplants using TA-NRP from cDCD (21), describing a median functional WIT of 21 min (range, 14–28) and a median NRP duration of 56 min (range, 42–71). Three patients developed EAD (23%), but none developed ischemic cholangiopathy (none underwent routine magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography). In Spain, based on the experience with A-NRP for abdominal organ recovery, we chose to extend A-NRP to TA-NRP by clamping the supra-aortic vessels and deflating the aortic ballon (10). This requires that cardiothoracic surgeons perform a rapid sternotomy, for which we highly recommend premortem surgical or percutaneous cannulation through femoral vessels. After a few minutes recovery of heart beating, NRP must be weaned off to check the viability of the heart for possible episodes of hypotension or venous overload that could damage the liver graft (22).

One of the main challenges is the combination of TA-NRP with lung recovery. We know about the tolerance of the lungs to warm ischemia and their recovery through reoxygenation with mechanical ventilation, reflected by similar outcomes with DCD and DBD (23). Although pulmonary recovery with simultaneously A-NRP has been well described (24), the use of NRP for the lungs can lead to congestion of the pulmonary circulation and tissue edema. Therefore, once the TA-NRP extraction technique has been validated, the recovery of the lungs and heart has been proposed through a short period of cardiac preweaning and a shortened time in TA-NRP, limited to heart checking and the beginning of the procedure in the cardiac recipient. Lung transplantation outcomes using this procedure will have to be analyzed and published in the future (25).

The main ethical concern for the extension of PRN to the thorax was the possible reoxygenation of the brain. To avoid this, we must ensure before starting PRN that the supra-aortic branches are clamped. Once TA-NRP is established, the cephalic ends of each vessel of the aortic arch are cannulated and the drained blood is returned to the venous reservoir for retransfusion or vented to the atmosphere (26). This allows the evacuation of possible blood entry routes to the brain mainly through vertebral arteries (11).

4.3. Limitations

Despite providing important data for a knowledge gap in the literature, our study has several limitations. Of note, we included only a limited number of patients with a short follow-up period; consequently, this research only demonstrates the feasibility and safety of the procedure with optimal donor selection and highly coordinated transplantation teams. The excellent outcomes could be explained as follows: (1) the strict donor selection criteria required patients with mostly young ages, low comorbidity, and short ICU stays; (2) the exclusion of “risky” recipients, such as retransplantations, hepato-renal transplantation or portal vein thrombosis (27); and (3) the optimization of surgical strategies, such as lowering the CIT as much as possible (28). Further studies with more patients, longer follow-up periods, and heart donors with extended criteria will be needed to obtain strong evidence about graft quality after TA-NRP with suboptimal weaning times and that could affect the success of liver transplantation.

4.4. Conclusion

This initial study about the success of liver grafts by TA-NRP from cDCD shows that this is a feasible and safe procurement method in terms of early allograft dysfunction, patient and graft survival, and non-anastomotic biliary complications.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Ethics and Clinical Investigation Committee of the BUH, code EOM023/22. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation was not required from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin because -Retrospective study with many patients died or lost of follow-up. The datasets were pseudonymized by a member of the Clinical Research Support Unit (independent from the study). Patients were identified in the datasets with an ad-hoc-created code to ensure anonymization. The study team commits not to carry out any activity to re-identify the patients once the dataset has been closed for analysis and to adopt specific security measures to prevent re-identification and access by unauthorized third parties. Written informed consent was not obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article because—Retrospective study, with most of patients died or lost of follow-up; data were collected based on electronic medical records and pseudonymized.

Author contributions

LS: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. FA: Writing – review & editing. JL: Writing – review & editing. ET: Writing – review & editing. OB: Writing – review & editing. PR: Validation, Writing – review & editing. MJ: Validation, Writing – review & editing. JR: Validation, Writing – review & editing. MR: Writing – review & editing. GM: Writing – review & editing. LL: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Michael Maudsley, from Universitat de Barcelona, for language and editing revision. The authors would like to acknowledge the Spanish Society of Liver Transplantation (SETH) and the Catalan Society of Transplantation (SCT) to avoid us to present preliminary data on their National Congresses respectively.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frtra.2023.1280454/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Lomero M, Gardiner D, Coll E, Haase-Kromwijk B, Procaccio F, Immer F, et al. Donation after circulatory death today: an updated overview of the European landscape. Transpl Int. (2020) 33(1):76–88. doi: 10.1111/tri.13506

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Hessheimer AJ, Cárdenas A, García-Valdecasas JC, Fondevila C. Can we prevent ischemic-type biliary lesions in donation after circulatory determination of death liver transplantation? Liver Transpl. (2016) 22(7):1025–33. doi: 10.1002/lt.24460

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Schlegel A, Kalisvaart M, Scalera I, Laing RW, Mergental H, Mirza DF, et al. The UK DCD risk score: a new proposal to define futility in donation-after-circulatory-death liver transplantation. J Hepatol. (2018) 68(3):456–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.10.034

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Tang JX, Na N, Li JJ, Fan L, Weng RH, Jiang N. Outcomes of controlled donation after cardiac death compared with donation after brain death in liver transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transplant Proc. (2018) 50(1):33–41. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.11.034

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Hessheimer AJ, García-Valdecasas JC, Fondevila C. Abdominal regional in-situ perfusion in donation after circulatory determination of death donors. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. (2016) 21(3):322–8. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000315

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Mehta V, Taylor M, Hasan J, Dimarakis I, Barnard J, Callan P, et al. Establishing a heart transplant programme using donation after circulatory-determined death donors: a United Kingdom based single-centre experience. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. (2019) 29(3):422–9. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivz121

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Messer S, Cernic S, Page A, Berman M, Kaul P, Colah S, et al. A 5-year single-center early experience of heart transplantation from donation after circulatory-determined death donors. J Heart Lung Transplant. (2020) 39(12):1463–75. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2020.10.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Abradelo de Usera M, Blasi Ibáñez A, Fundora Suárez Y, Fondevila Campo C, Gómez Gutiérrez M, Sánchez Turrión V. Protocolo nacional de donación y trasplante hepático en donación en asistolía controlada. ONT. (2015) 151:1–51.

Google Scholar

9. Perez-Villares JM, Rubio JJ, del Río F, Miñambres E. Validation of a new proposal to avoid donor resuscitation in controlled donation after circulatory death with normothermic regional perfusion. Resuscitation. (2017) 117:46–9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.05.030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Miñambres E, Royo-Villanova M, Pérez-Redondo M, Coll E, Villar-García S, Canovas SJ, et al. Spanish experience with heart transplants from controlled donation after the circulatory determination of death using thoraco-abdominal normothermic regional perfusion and cold storage. Am J Transplant. (2021) 21(4):1597–602. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16446

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Manara A, Shemie SD, Large S, Healey A, Baker A, Badiwala M, et al. Maintaining the permanence principle for death during in situ normothermic regional perfusion for donation after circulatory death organ recovery: a United Kingdom and Canadian proposal. Am J Transplant. (2020) 20(8):2017–25. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15775

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Olthoff KM, Kulik L, Samstein B, Kaminski M, Abecassis M, Emond J, et al. Validation of a current definition of early allograft dysfunction in liver transplant recipients and analysis of risk factors. Liver Transpl. (2010) 16(8):943–9. doi: 10.1002/lt.22091

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Hessheimer AJ, de la Rosa G, Gastaca M, Ruíz P, Otero A, Gómez M, et al. Abdominal normothermic regional perfusion in controlled donation after circulatory determination of death liver transplantation: outcomes and risk factors for graft loss. Am J Transplant. (2022) 22(4):1169–81. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16899

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Gaurav R, Butler AJ, Kosmoliaptsis V, Mumford L, Fear C, Swift L, et al. Liver transplantation outcomes from controlled circulatory death donors: SCS vs in situ NRP vs ex situ NMP. Ann Surg. (2022) 275(6):1156–64. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005428

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. de Beule J, Vandendriessche K, Pengel LHM, Bellini MI, Dark JH, Hessheimer AJ, et al. A systematic review and meta-analyses of regional perfusion in donation after circulatory death solid organ transplantation. Transpl Int. (2021) 34(11):2046–60. doi: 10.1111/tri.14121

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Hessheimer AJ, Coll E, Torres F, Ruíz P, Gastaca M, Rivas JI, et al. Normothermic regional perfusion vs. Super-rapid recovery in controlled donation after circulatory death liver transplantation. J Hepatol. (2019) 70(4):658–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.12.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Muller X, Mohkam K, Mueller M, Schlegel A, Dondero F, Sepulveda A, et al. Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion versus normothermic regional perfusion in liver transplantation from controlled donation after circulatory death: first international comparative study. Ann Surg. (2020) 272(5):751–8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004268

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Watson CJE, Hunt F, Messer S, Currie I, Large S, Sutherland A, et al. In situ normothermic perfusion of livers in controlled circulatory death donation may prevent ischemic cholangiopathy and improve graft survival. Am J Transplant. (2019) 19(6):1745–58. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15241

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Anguela-Calvet L, Moreno-Gonzalez G, Sbraga F, Gonzalez-Costello J, Tsui S, Oliver-Juan E. Heart donation from donors after controlled circulatory death. Transplantation. (2021) 105(7):1482–91. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003545

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Croome KP, Daneshmand MA. Successfully sharing the sandbox: a perspective on combined DCD liver and heart donor procurement. Am J Transplant. (2021) 21(2):484–7. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16309

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Sellers MT, Nassar A, Alebrahim M, Sasaki K, Lee DD, Bohorquez H, et al. Early United States experience with liver donation after circulatory determination of death using thoraco-abdominal normothermic regional perfusion: a multi-institutional observational study. Clin Transplant. (2022) 36(6):1–8. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14659

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Messer SJ, Axell RG, Colah S, White PA, Ryan M, Page AA, et al. Functional assessment and transplantation of the donor heart after circulatory death. J Heart Lung Transplant. (2016) 35(12):1443–52. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2016.07.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Palleschi A, Rosso L, Musso V, Rimessi A, Bonitta G, Nosotti M. Lung transplantation from donation after controlled cardiocirculatory death. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Transplant Rev. (2020) 34(1):100513. doi: 10.1016/j.trre.2019.100513

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Miñambres E, Ruiz P, Ballesteros MA, Álvarez C, Cifrián JM, Atutxa L, et al. Combined lung and liver procurement in controlled donation after circulatory death using normothermic abdominal perfusion. Initial experience in two Spanish centers. Am J Transplant. (2020) 20(1):231–40. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15520

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Vandendriessche K, Tchana-Sato V, Ledoux D, Degezelle K, Rex S, Neyrinck A, et al. Transplantation of donor hearts after circulatory death using normothermic regional perfusion and cold storage preservation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. (2021) 60(4):813–9. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab139

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Royo-Villanova M, Miñambres E, Sánchez JM, Torres E, Manso C, Ballesteros MÁ, et al. Maintaining the permanence principle of death during normothermic regional perfusion in controlled DCD: results of a prospective clinical study. Am J Transplant. (2023). doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.09.008 [Epub ahead of print].37739346

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Azoulay D, Salloum C, Llado L, Ramos E, Lopez-Dominguez J, Cachero A, et al. Defining surgical difficulty of liver transplantation. Ann Surg. (2023) 277(1):144–50. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Hessheimer AJ, de la Rosa G, Gastaca M, Ruíz P, Otero A, Gómez M, et al. Abdominal normothermic regional perfusion in controlled donation after circulatory determination of death liver transplantation: outcomes and risk factors for graft loss. Am J Transplant. (2022) 22(4):1169–81.34856070

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Keywords: asistolia, controlled donation after cardiac death, liver transplant, normothermic regional perfusion, heart transplant

Citation: Secanella L, Alconchel F, López-Monclús J, Toledo-Martínez E, Barrios O, Ramírez P, Jiménez-Garrido MC, Rodríguez-Sanjuán JC, Royo-Villanova M, Moreno-González G and Lladó L (2023) Outcomes of liver transplantation with thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion: a matched-controlled initial experience in Spain. Front. Transplant. 2:1280454. doi: 10.3389/frtra.2023.1280454

Received: 20 August 2023; Accepted: 16 October 2023;
Published: 1 November 2023.

Edited by:

Angus John Hann, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, United Kingdom

Reviewed by:

Anji Wall, Baylor University Medical Center, United States
Davide Ghinolfi, Pisana University Hospital, Italy

© 2023 Secanella, Alconchel, López-Monclús, Toledo-Martínez, Barrios, Ramírez, Jiménez-Garrido, Rodríguez-Sanjuán, Royo-Villanova, Moreno-González and Lladó. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Luis Secanella lsecanella@bellvitgehospital.cat

Abbreviations NRT, normothermic regional perfusion; NMP, normothermic machine perfusion; CIT, cold ischemia time; cDCD, controlled donation after circulatory death; DBD, donation after brain death; EAD, early allograft dysfunction; PNF, primary non-function; ITBL, ischemic-type biliary lesions; ICU, intensive care unit; MELD, Model of End-Stage Liver Disease; SCS, static cold storage; SRR, super rapid recovery; WIT, warm ischemia time; WMV, withdrawal of mechanical ventilation.

Download