Editorial: Perception-driven Acoustic Engineering

Antonio J Torija^1*Siddhartha Krishnamurthy²Roberto Merino-Martinez³

• ¹University of Salford, Salford, United Kingdom
• ²NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, United States
• ³Technische Universiteit Delft, Delft, Netherlands

Since its introduction by Davies (2007) 1 , this approach has received significant attention, notably in aircraft design (Rizzi, 2016) 2 . As a structured methodology, a perception-driven engineering framework integrates sound acquisition, sound evaluation, and design implementation, explicitly quantifying acoustic and human factors alongside other key engineering parameters to inform robust and optimised final designs.A central theme across the contributions is the recognition that human response is shaped by a combination of acoustic and non-acoustic influences, requiring engineering methods that explicitly account for these interacting factors. This is illustrated clearly by Woodcock et al. (2025), who examine annoyance responses to the sound of a medical-delivery drone under varying operational and contextual conditions. The authors show that annoyance depends not only on physical factors, such as listener-drone distance and ambient soundscape 3,4 , but also on contextual information 5 , including whether listeners are told the drone is being used for medical deliveries. Annoyance decreased with increasing distance and was higher in quieter environments 6 , while providing medical-use context significantly reduced annoyance. These results highlight the importance of community engagement, as perceived purpose influences noise response alongside acoustic mitigation. A key conclusion of Woodcock et al. ( 2025) is therefore that drone and AAM integration must be socio-acoustically informed, combining acoustic design and operational planning with communication strategies that address how communities interpret new sounds.An important challenge is how we measure and model perception in ways that are usable in design cycles. Münder et al. (2024) argue that evaluating electric vehicle acoustic experience must account for the time-varying nature of the associated acoustic signals. To capture this temporal variation, they use the Continuous Evaluation Procedure (CEP) to obtain moment-by-moment judgments while participants listen to accelerating electric vehicles in an immersive simulator. Their results show that CEP uncovers time-dependent patterns in quality and annoyance that are missed by conventional single-value ratings, and they recommend its systematic adoption for transient acoustic events. By treating acceleration as a perceptual episode with internal structure, Münder et al. (2024) offer a practical link between psychoacoustics and engineering validation, enabling designers to identify and control undesirable perceptual phases in an operational sequence. 2024) address the need for efficient prediction of perceptual attributes. They develop objective models for sensory attributes and desire-to-buy judgments of recreational vehicles using parsimonious multiple linear regression methods (Lasso 7 and Elastic Net 8 ). These models are trained on combinations of standard engineering and psychoacoustic metrics together with descriptors derived from Music Information Retrieval (MIR) feature extraction. Their analysis shows that compact linear models can reliably represent the full set of perceptual attributes, including desire-to-buy, while relying on only a small number of physical and psychophysical predictors. Importantly, this work reinforces a message aligned with Industry 5.0 goals that perception-driven design can link perceptual targets such as softness, aggressiveness, and perceived power to a manageable set of metrics, enabling actionable guidance for engineering design. The Research Topic also shows that perception-driven engineering must operate within wider governance, health, and equity contexts, particularly as new aerial mobility vehicles introduce novel noise exposure patterns with implications for public health and fairness. Lavia et al. ( 2025) address this need by proposing a transdisciplinary Sound, Noise and Health Conceptual Framework aimed at supporting fair and equitable dispersion of aircraft operations. By embedding dispersion and impact management within a structure that integrates stakeholder engagement and non-acoustic moderators, Lavia et al. ( 2025) show how perception-driven acoustics can support policy decisions, shifting the focus from narrow sound level-based optimisation toward broader considerations of health, equity, and contextual response. This contribution is especially important for future AAM systems, where routing, scheduling, and operational concepts may evolve more quickly than community responses can be measured.Looking ahead, the continued expansion of electric mobility and autonomous systems will further increase the complexity of future soundscapes. The contributions in this Research Topic point toward an emerging consensus: progress will rely on simplified and interpretable models that accurately link physical design parameters to perceived sound quality, advances in auralisation and psychoacoustic modelling, clearer definitions of key performance indicators to guide optimisation, and evaluation methods that integrate contextual and societal factors. This progress will ensure that acoustic design supports not only technical performance but also human experience and community wellbeing.