Abstract
The role of the right hemisphere (RH) in post-stroke aphasia (PSA) has not been completely understood. In general, the language alterations in PSA are normally evaluated from the perspective of the language processing models developed from Western languages such as English. However, the successful application of the models for assessing Chinese-language functions in patients with PSA has not been reported. In this study, the features of specific language-related lesion distribution and early variations of structure in RH in Chinese patients with PSA were investigated. Forty-two aphasic patients (female: 13, male: 29, mean age: 58 ± 12 years) with left hemisphere (LH) injury between 1 and 6 months after stroke were included. The morphological characteristics, both at the levels of gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM), were quantified by 3T multiparametric brain MRI. The Fridriksson et al.’s dual-stream model was used to compare language-related lesion regions. Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping (VLSM) analysis has been performed. Our results showed that lesions in the precentral, superior frontal, middle frontal, and postcentral gyri were responsible for both the production and comprehension dysfunction of Chinese patients with PSA and were quite different from the lesions described by using the dual-stream model of Fridriksson et al. Furthermore, gray matter volume (GMV) was found significantly decreased in RH, and WM integrity was disturbed in RH after LH injury in Chinese patients with PSA. The different lesion patterns between Chinese patients with PSA and English-speaking patients with PSA may indicate that the dual-stream model of Fridriksson et al. is not suitable for the assessment of Chinese-language functions in Chinese patients with PSA in subacute phase of recovery. Moreover, decreased structural integrity in RH was found in Chinese patients with PSA.
Introduction
Stroke is one of the leading causes of aphasia, accounting for approximately 30–40% of stroke survivors with aphasia (; Marebwa et al., 2017; Nouwens et al., 2018). The recovery of language function after stroke may be divided into three overlapping phases. The initial phase is called the acute phase and lasts for about 2 weeks after the onset of the stroke. The second phase is called the subacute phase, extending usually up to 6 months after the onset. The third phase, called the chronic phase, begins months to years after stroke, and it may continue for the rest of the person’s life (; Yang et al., 2018). The mechanisms promoting the recovery and reorganization of language in post-stroke aphasia (PSA) are still unresolved. Until now, the role of the right hemisphere (RH) in the recovery of PSA remains controversial. Previous studies suggested an important role of RH in the recovery from PSA due to left hemisphere (LH) stroke (; Weiller et al., 1995; Musso et al., 1999; ; Winhuisen et al., 2005; Turkeltaub et al., 2012). Previous studies investigating treatment-induced neural plasticity in chronic aphasia showed increased RH activation associated with better recovery in the chronic stage (; ). Some studies suggest that increased RH activation may result in excessive right-to-left suppression, which may hinder language performance (; ; Naeser et al., 2004; Thiel et al., 2006). Moreover, the relationship between structural changes in RH and lesions in LH remains unknown. Recently, neuroimaging has been suggested to play an important role in the exploration of the implication of RH in the recovery from PSA. For a description of specific language functions related to RH structures or brain networks, local gray matter volume (GMV) is commonly measured to explain additional variance in language outcome based on T1-weighted images (; Xing et al., 2016) along with white matter (WM) regions detected by diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) (; ; Pani et al., 2016).
Until now, several language models have been used to describe the relationship between language dysfunction and lesions in patients with PSA. The dual-stream model of language processing, one of the most used neuropsychological models of speech and language organization (; , ; ), has been used frequently as the classic template (; ; Zündorf et al., 2016; ; McKinnon et al., 2018; Northam et al., 2018) in order to evaluate language dysfunction concerning brain damage in PSA. This model describes two large-scale processing streams, namely, the dorsal stream is crucial for producing fluent speech and auditory-motor integration processes, and the ventral stream supports the mapping between sound and meaning and thus it is related to auditory comprehension (Saur et al., 2008; ; Sammler et al., 2015; ; ). Most previous studies mainly focused on the location and extension of the brain damage after stroke, and less attention was paid to the differences in the native languages (). Tonal languages such as Mandarin differ from Indo-European languages in their morpho syllabic and segmental structure (Zhao et al., 2011; Leppänen et al., 2019). These differences between tonal and Indo-European languages have been evidenced not only in their linguistic features but also in their neural correlates (Wong et al., 2007) and even in genetic expression ().
In this exploratory and prospective study, we investigated lesion distribution in Chinese patients with PSA in subacute phase with MRI and evaluated the language deficits from the prism of the dual-stream language model with the following purposes: (1) to study the lesion distribution and its relationship with specific language deficits in Chinese patients with PSA; (2) to explore whether the dual-stream model of Fridriksson et al. fits with the pattern of lesion deficit found in Chinese PSA and thus to conclude if the dual-stream model is valid to measure the language deficits observed in Chinese patients with PSA; and (3) to explore changes in RH of Chinese patients with PSA. To achieve these objectives, MRI analyses [e.g., voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping (VLSM), GMV analysis defined by Automated Anatomical Labeling (AAL) atlas, Tract-Based Spatial Statistics (TBSS), and tractography] were used.
Materials and Methods
Participants
Consecutive 42 patients (female: 13, male: 29, mean age: 58± 12) with PSA were recruited between March 2014 and June 2018 from the neurology department of Dongzhimen Hospital, Speech and Language Therapy Center of China Rehabilitation Research Centre and Neurology Department of Peking University Third Hospital. Inclusion criteria were as follows: first-ever LH ischemic stroke that happened between 1 and 6 months before language testing and MRI examination; aphasia was confirmed by a research speech-language pathologist; and all patients were right-handed based on the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (EHI) test since the EHI test has the advantage of being a simple and brief method of evaluating laterality using a quantitative scale (Veale, 2014) and the hemispheric lateralization was also assessed by using functional MRI according to a previous publication (Wilke and Lidzba, 2007). All patients were native Chinese speakers and monolinguals. The noninclusion criteria were as follows: history of another neurological or psychiatric disease; MRI-incompatible prosthesis; and inability to perform speech and language testing as well as MRI examinations due to the severity of aphasia or comorbidity. A control group composed of 30 healthy native Chinese-speaking controls (HC) matched by age, gender, and education level were included (Figure 1). All participants have signed an informed consent form before the start of the study. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and Ethics Committee of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine.
FIGURE 1
Speech and Language Testing
All patients performed a battery of language tests: Chinese Rehabilitation Research Center Standard Aphasia Examination (CRRCAE), which is designed according to the rules of Mandarin. The reliability and validity of this scale have been tested in a previous study and it has good reliability and sensitivity that can be used as a quantitative table for the diagnosis and treatment of aphasia among Mandarin users (Zhang et al., 2005; Tao et al., 2014; Zhu D. et al., 2014; ). According to the characteristics of aphasia symptoms, the scale was divided into three subitems, namely, comprehension, expression, and other speech-related abilities (e.g., calculation, copy, and cartoon description). In this study, comprehension was assessed at the reading and auditory levels, and production was measured through repetition and description levels.
MRI Data Acquisition
Different MRI sequences were acquired in all participants to obtain GM and WM information. Neuroimaging was acquired in a Siemens 3T Trio MRI scanner (Erlangen, Germany). Axial anatomical images were acquired using a high-resolution three-dimensional T1-weighted images with the following: repetition time (TR) = 1,900 ms, echo time (TE) = 2.13 ms, time of inversion (TI) = 900 ms, flip angle = 9°, resolution = 256 × 256, and voxel size = 1.0 mm × 1.0 mm × 1.0 mm. DTI was acquired with a diffusion-weighted, single-shot, spin-echo, echo-planar imaging sequence using 30 directions with b = 0 s/mm2 and b = 1,000 s/mm2, slice thickness: 2 mm, gap = 0 mm, slices = 65, TR: 11,000 ms, TE: 94 ms, matrix: 128 × 128, field of view (FOV): 256 × 256, voxel size = 2 × 2 × 2, and phase-encoding direction: A >> P.
MRI Data Preprocessing
T1-Weighted Image
T1-weighted imaging data preprocessing was carried out using SPM121 and CAT122 with standard processing procedures including high-dimensional DARTEL (Diffeomorphic Anatomical Registration Through Exponentiated Lie Algebra) normalization algorithms and modulation for nonlinear components. Preprocessing steps also include the segmentation of whole-brain images into GM, WM, and cerebrospinal fluid and the normalization to the DARTEL template in MNI space (Template_1_IXI555_MNI152.nii). Finally, the volume of the 90 brain GM regions defined by the AAL atlas was calculated.
Diffusion-Weighted Image
Diffusion-weighted imaging data were preprocessed using FMRIB Software Library (FSL3) (, ). First, the correction for eddy currents and subject motion was applied using the “eddy_correct” function. Then, the volume with no diffusion weighting was extracted and named “nodif.” Then, a single binarized volume in diffusion space containing ones inside the brain and zeroes outside the brain will be got by “bet2” in the “nodif.” “dtifit” fitted a diffusion tensor model at each voxel. Outputs of dtifit have mean diffusivity (MD), fractional anisotropy (FA), first eigenvalue (L1), second eigenvalue (L2), and third eigenvalue (L3). In particular, L1 is also called axial diffusivity (AD), and the mean of L1 and L2 is called radial diffusivity (RD).
The TBSS pipeline was applied with recommended parameters. Voxel-wise statistical analysis of the FA data was carried out using TBSS, part of FSL. First, the FA data of all subjects were aligned into a common space using the FMRIB nonlinear image registration tool (FNIRT), which uses a b-spline representation of the registration warp field. Next, the mean FA image was created and thinned to create a mean FA skeleton, which represents the center of all tracts common to the group. The aligned FA data of each subject were then projected onto this skeleton and the resulting data were fed into voxel-wise cross-subject statistics (Rueckert et al., 1999; Smith, 2002; Smith et al., 2004; Smith et al., 2006).
We also obtained a WM fiber bundle that crosses the GM region in which there was a significant difference between the healthy control group and the patient group. WM fiber bundles were calculated with the TrackVis toolbox.4 Specifically, “dti_recon” was used to build the tensor, then “dti_tracker” was for deterministic fiber tracking. The default parameters or settings were performed. The termination conditions of fiber tracking include FA value <0.2 and deflection angle >35°. We determined the WM fibers that passed through in native space, this gave fiber number (FN) maps. Referring to the abovementioned steps, the skeleton map of FN was generated.
Lesion Identification
Lesion-symptom mapping was demarcated on T1-weighted images manually using MRIcrogl5 in native space by neurologists who were blinded to the language scores of participants. Figure 2 shows a lesion overlap map for the aphasic participant group. The value of each voxel represented the number of patients with damaged at this voxel. The brighter the color in the figure, the more people injured in the area.
FIGURE 2
Statistical Analysis
Voxel-Based Lesion-Symptom Mapping Analysis
The purpose of VLSM analysis was used to identify the lesion area related to the language impairment. To better understand the effects of LH lesion on language performance, a VLSM was used to analyze the relationship between lesion and behavior () with VLSM toolbox6 based on MATLAB (R2016b, MathWorks, Massachusetts, MA, United States). VLSM analyses were run with 1,000 permutation tests resulting in T-maps that reflected critical regions where lesional tissue was associated with the performance on a given language measure. Significant results were derived from voxel-wise t-tests using a threshold of p < 0.05 with permutation-based correction for multiple comparisons (Lukic et al., 2017).
Gray Matter Volume Analysis
The GMV analysis was used to evaluate the difference in the GM areas in RH between the patient group and the healthy control group. The group differences (healthy participant group vs. aphasic patient group) in GMV were examined in all regions of RH, defined by the AAL atlas. For each region, the mean GMV was calculated. A linear regression was also used to access whether there were differences between the groups. The results were adjusted for the 45 regions with the Bonferroni correction method (corrected p < 0.05). In addition, we also examined the difference in the whole-brain, LH, and RH GMV between the healthy control group and the aphasic patient group.
Structural covariance between the left lesion regions and the right significant regions was assessed. Using Pearson’s correlation coefficient, the covariance between the brain regions was defined. Specifically, the co-degeneration between the volume of the brain area with a difference in the right brain and the volume of the left brain area determined by VLSM was calculated, and p < 0.05 was taken as the criterion for judging significance.
Tract-Based Spatial Statistics Analysis
The TBSS analysis was used to evaluate the difference of WM in RH between patients and healthy controls. First, we examined the relationship of FA, a measure for fiber density, axonal diameter, and myelination in WM between groups in skeleton regions of RH. A design matrix was generated using the “design_ttest2” in FSL. The FA maps were categorized as controls or patients. Statistical analysis was performed using the FSL tool “randomize” with 1,000 permutations. Threshold-Free Cluster Enhancement (TFCE; Smith and Nichols, 2009) was applied for correction of multiple comparisons. The threshold for statistical significance was p < 0.05. Then, the mean FA was calculated in significant skeleton regions. Other measures of WM, such as MD, AD, and RD, were also processed in the same way. Using the linear model, the relationship between the index on the WM skeleton and the language performance in the WM fiber defined in the Johns Hopkins University (JHU) template was calculated.
Tractography Analysis
Tractography was used to evaluate the differences of WM fibers associated with different GM regions between the patient group and the healthy control group. For tractography, the mean FN, FA, MD, AD, and RD of all subjects were calculated in the FN skeleton map. Then, we examined the differences of those indexes between the healthy control and patients with PSA by a two-sample t-test. In addition, the relationship between the volume of brain regions with differences in volume between the control group and the PSA group and the WM fiber indicators passing through these brain regions was calculated.
Results
Demographic and Behavioral Results
Patients with PSA and HC did not significantly differ in age, gender, or years of education. Stroke-related clinical characteristics of the patients were tested using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) (Lyden et al., 2001; ). The overall production and comprehension ability were evaluated by z scores of their subitems: Listen, Read, Repeat, and Speak. (The results showed that these patients had functional impairment in Listen, Read, Repeat, and Speak. Among these results, the average scores of the patients for the four tests were 16 ± 12, 16 ± 12, 10 ± 9, and 7 ± 9, out of 40, 40, 30, and 30, respectively; Table 1).
TABLE 1
| Total | HC | PSA | t/χ2 | p | |
| n | 72 | 30 | 42 | – | – |
| Age (years) | 58 ± 12 | 56 ± 11 | 58 ± 12 | 64.08 | 0.468 |
| Gender (F/F%) | 22/31% | 9/30% | 13/31% | 0.007 | 0.931 |
| Education (years) | 10 ± 4 | 10 ± 4 | 10 ± 3 | −0.124 | 0.901 |
| Handedness (R/L) | 72/0 | 30/0 | 42/0 | – | – |
| Time post stroke (days) | – | – | 81 ± 70 | – | – |
| Lesion volume (ml) | – | – | 28 ± 25 | – | – |
| TIV (ml) | 1490 123 | 1483 150 | 1494 115 | –0.354 | 0.725 |
| GM volume (ml) | 548 ± 61 | 581 ± 60 | 524 ± 61*** | 3.954 | <0.001 |
| WM volume (ml) | 487 ± 54 | 508 ± 59 | 472 ± 57* | 2.589 | 0.012 |
| CSF volume (ml) | 450 ± 89 | 392 ± 61 | 491 ± 84*** | –5.497 | <0.001 |
| Left GM volume (ml) | 212 ± 30 | 232 ± 25 | 198 ± 29*** | 5.158 | <0.001 |
| Right GM volume (ml) | 221 ± 24 | 231 ± 24 | 214 ± 24** | 2.899 | 0.005 |
| Comprehension Z-score | – | – | 0 ± 0.95 | – | – |
| Production Z-score | – | – | 0 ± 0.94 | – | – |
| Listen | – | – | 16 ± 12 | – | – |
| Read | – | – | 16 ± 12 | – | – |
| Repeat | – | – | 10 ± 9 | – | – |
| Speak | – | – | 7 ± 9 | – | – |
| NIHSS | – | – | 7 ± 4 | – | – |
Demographic and behavioral results.
HC, healthy control; PSA, post-stroke aphasia; TIV: total intracranial volume; GM: gray matter volume; WMV, white matter volume; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001, versus HC.
Voxel-Based Lesion-Symptom Mapping Results
As shown in Figure 3, the comprehension- and production-related lesions were derived from VLSM analysis. There was a negative correlation between production ability and lesions in the precentral, superior frontal, middle frontal, and postcentral gyri of LH (p = 0.001). Similarly, the comprehension ability was negatively correlated with lesions in the precentral gyrus, superior frontal gyrus, middle frontal gyrus, insula gyrus, postcentral gyrus, and inferior parietal lobule of LH (p < 0.001). It is worth mentioning that the left precentral, superior frontal, middle frontal, and postcentral gyri showed a negative correlation with the performance of both comprehension and production abilities.
FIGURE 3
These resulting clusters (Table 2) were compared with areas comprised in the dorsal and ventral streams in the dual-stream model, as reported in the study by . Our results showed clear differences in lesion areas between the description of Fridriksson et al.’s dual-stream model and that of this study. The lesion areas in our results were consistent neither with the description of lesion areas in the superior frontal and middle frontal of the dorsal pathway by Fridriksson et al. nor with the lesion areas in precentral, superior frontal, middle frontal, postcentral, and inferior parietal lobule of the ventral stream (Figure 3E). Lesion overlapping for all patients is shown in Figure 3E. The overlap rates of language-related lesions (yellow) with a dorsal pathway (blue), and ventral pathway (pink) were 57.72% of all production-related lesions located in the dorsal pathway and only 0.48% of all comprehension-related lesions located in the ventral pathway.
TABLE 2
| Region | Abbreviation | Dorsal | Ventral |
| Angular gyrus | ANG | Yes | |
| Caudate nucleus | CAU | Yes | |
| Inferior frontal gyrus, opercular part | IFGoperc | Yes | |
| Inferior frontal gyrus, orbital part | ORBinf | Yes | Yes |
| Inferior frontal gyrus, triangular part | IFGtriang | Yes | |
| Insula | INS | Yes | Yes (0.0048) |
| Middle frontal gyrus | MFG | Yes (0.0537) | |
| Middle occipital gyrus | MOG | Yes | |
| Lenticular nucleus, pallidum | PAL | ||
| Postcentral gyrus | PoCG | Yes (0.1163) | |
| Precentral gyrus | PreCG | Yes (0.4072) | |
| Lenticular nucleus, putamen | PUT | Yes | Yes |
| Supramarginal gyrus | SMG | Yes | Yes |
| Inferior temporal gyrus | ITG | Yes | |
| Middle temporal gyrus | MTG | Yes | |
| Temporal pole: middle temporal gyrus | TPOmid | Yes | |
| Temporal pole: superior temporal gyrus | TPOsup | Yes | |
| Superior temporal gyrus | STG | Yes |
Overlap between lesion areas and the dual-stream model.
The values in brackets in the dorsal and ventral columns represent the overlap rate between the VLSM result and the dual-stream model raised by .
Gray Matter Volume in the Right Hemisphere of Post-stroke Aphasia
The PSA group showed a significantly lower mean GMV than HC group (p < 0.001), as shown in Figure 4A. Meanwhile, a structural covariance was found between the declined GM areas and language-related lesions in LH (Figure 4B). The superior frontal gyrus, medial orbital, and middle and inferior temporal gyri were key nodes with higher weight in structural covariance (Figure 4C).
FIGURE 4
White Matter Structure in Right Hemisphere
The TBSS results, as shown in Table 3, indicated lower integrity in the tracts of the PSA group as compared with those of HC. There were significant differences in FA values and MD, AD, and RD values of RH between the PSA group and the HC group. A significant decrease in FA values and a significant increase in MD, AD, and RD values were demonstrated in patients with PSA as compared with HC (Table 3). Five clusters showed a positive correlation with language abilities in patients with PSA (Figure 5).
TABLE 3
| HC | PSA | Test | ||||
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | t | p | |
| Indexes in skeleton by TBSS | ||||||
| FA values(×10–1) | 7.039 | 0.156 | 6.400 | 0.577 | 5.826 | <0.001 |
| MD values(×10–4) | 3.642 | 0.154 | 4.412 | 0.938 | −4.387 | <0.001 |
| AD values(×10–4) | 7.108 | 0.211 | 8.066 | 1.059 | −4.816 | <0.001 |
| RD values(×10–4) | 1.899 | 0.156 | 2.664 | 0.878 | −4.649 | <0.001 |
| Indexes in fiber by fiber tracking | ||||||
| FN | 5.241 | 1.434 | 6.305 | 3.396 | −1.592 | 0.116 |
| FA values(×10–1) | 5.330 | 0.220 | 5.070 | 0.574 | 2.320 | 0.023 |
| MD values(×10–4) | 4.285 | 0.172 | 4.703 | 0.846 | −2.626 | 0.011 |
| AD values(×10–4) | 6.837 | 0.259 | 7.284 | 0.837 | −2.784 | 0.007 |
| RD values(×10–4) | 2.974 | 0.171 | 3.386 | 0.861 | −2.546 | 0.013 |
White matter indexes in patients with PSA compared with HC.
TBSS, Tract-Based Spatial Statistics; FA, fractional anisotropy; MD, mean diffusivity; AD, axial diffusivity; RD, radial diffusivity.
FIGURE 5
Deterministic tractography analyses revealed, as shown in Figure 6A, a positive correlation between GMV and FA in the tracts passing through these areas in RH. Figures 6B,C demonstrates that reduced GMV was also associated with reduced FA in WM linking them while FN did not change significantly.
FIGURE 6
Discussion
Our previous study has shown that the damage areas in post-stroke motor aphasia were not only located in the areas of the well-known motor speech center such as the Broca’s area, but some other damaged areas might be also involved in the formation of motor aphasia in Chinese patients with PSA (). In this study, we found that lesions in sensorimotor areas are highly correlated with language comprehension and expression in Chinese native speakers. The present results are consistent with a previous study reporting that the human brain sensorimotor system may play an important role in the language process ().
used the dual-stream model among English-speaking patients with PSA and demonstrated that distinct anatomical boundaries were revealed between a dorsal frontoparietal stream (form-to-articulation pathway) and a ventral temporal-frontal stream (form-to-meaning pathway), showing a division between two processing routes underlying English speech processing (). Previous studies performed by in native Russia-speaking patients with PSA and Rosso et al. (2015) in native French-speaking patients with PSA have shown some variabilities in the results as compared with the study results in English speakers (; ), suggesting that different native languages might influence the dual-stream model although English, French, and Russian belong to a family of Indo-European languages.
Previous study (Valaki et al., 2004) has shown that tonal language such as Chinese differs from Indo-European languages not only in its written and spoken forms but also in the cerebral mechanisms involved in language functions. Valaki et al. (2004) found that while Indo-European language (e.g., Spanish and English) speakers showed strong lateralization of activity sources to LH, the Chinese demonstrated greater individual variability in the degree and direction of hemispheric asymmetries with emerging a bilaterally symmetric profile. These differences in the degree of hemispheric asymmetry were primarily due to a greater degree of activation in the right temporoparietal region in the Chinese group, suggesting increased participation of RH (Valaki et al., 2004).
In this study, lesions in sensorimotor areas correlated with both comprehension and production abilities in Chinese patients with PSA. A lesion-related language model was used in this study to distinguish the pathways of comprehension and production in native Chinese-speaking patients. The sensorimotor area and most of the frontal lobe are involved in lesion model response for both production and comprehension. We compared this model with the dual-stream model of Fridriksson et al. by calculating the overlap rate. The results showed only 0.5% of lesions related to comprehension overlap with the ventral stream, which is responsible for the meaning of language, and about 50% of lesions related to production overlap with the dorsal stream, which is responsible for expression. Furthermore, brain regions related to Chinese and Western language pathways have been reported to be different (; Tan et al., 2005). Previous studies have also shown that Chinese patients with PSA and English-speaking patients with PSA had different language-related GM areas (; Tan et al., 2005) and different WM clusters (Zhu L. et al., 2014). For the first time, to the best of our knowledge, we demonstrate in this study that Chinese patients with PSA and English-speaking patients with PSA may have similarities in production-related lesions but may be quite different in comprehension-related lesions. Our results suggested that the dual-stream model of Fridriksson et al. may not be suitable for the evaluation of the language abilities in Chinese patients with PSA in the subacute phase of recovery. Therefore, a language model should be established in the patient’s native language.
In this prospective study, a significantly structural covariance was found between reduced GMV in RH and language-related lesions in LH. Meanwhile, the TBSS skeleton of the PSA group showed decreased FA and increased MD when compared with HC groups, thus reflecting a decreased integrity of WM in RH after LH stroke. The fiber tracking through reduced GM areas also decreased in FA values with no difference in FN, indicating that the WM integrity in these areas was also affected. Previous studies have shown a compensatory increase of GMV in RH during recovery of PSA (; ; Lukic et al., 2017). However, our results demonstrated that GMV in RH significantly decreased in Chinese patients with PSA. One of the explanations for this difference may be that previous studies were done in patients who had stroke for more than 6 months before, whereas in this study, patients were included between 1 and 6 months after stroke. Another possible explanation is that there may be a difference not only in lesion distribution but also in RH structure alteration after LH stroke between Chinese patients with PSA and English-speaking patients with PSA due to different language mechanisms.
There are some limitations of this study. The first limitation is the heterogeneity in the inclusion time. Only patients in the subacute phase of recovery (between 1 and 6 months post-stroke) were included in this study. Previous study (Saur et al., 2006) has shown a difference in overall patterns of language activation for different phases after stroke. Saur et al. (2006) found a large increase of activation in the bilateral language network with the strongest increase of activation in RH language areas during the subacute phase, which was different from the pattern of language activation in the chronic phase. The imaging parameters including GMV may change during this time. Therefore, the results of patients at the beginning of subacute phase (e.g., 1-month post-stroke) may be different from those of patients 6 months post-stroke. However, most patients with PSA were included in this study between 2 and 3 months (81 ± 70 days) post-stroke; therefore, the heterogeneity of our study was relatively small. It will be interesting to know the status of GMV in RH more than 6 months after stroke in Chinese patients with PSA. Moreover, only English-speaking patients with PSA in the chronic phase (≥6 months after the onset of stroke) were included in the dual-stream model study by ; therefore, this might explain partly why the dual-stream model of Fridriksson et al. may not be suitable for the evaluation of the language abilities in Chinese patients with PSA in the subacute phase of recovery. Second, Western language-speaking patients with PSA were not directly included in this study. Third, this study has shown that only a small number of patients had the lesions distributed in the ventral pathway. The muster of lesions may be typical for Chinese native speaker patients with PSA. However, further study with a larger number of patients is needed for verification of the results.
Conclusion
In this prospective study, we investigated lesion distribution and early changes of RH in Chinese patients with PSA. Our results suggested for the first time that the dual-stream model of Fridriksson et al. is not suitable for the language evaluation of Chinese patients with PSA in the subacute phase of recovery. Furthermore, decreased GMV and low WM integrity were found in Chinese patients with PSA compared with HC.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board and Ethics Committee of Dongzhimen hospital affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese Medicine. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.
Author contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.
Funding
This study was supported by the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (project no. 7181005), the University Medicine Seed Fund for Interdisciplinary Research (grant no. BMU2018MX027), and the Research Funds for the Central Universities (project no. 2019-JYB-TD-003). The research leading to these results has received funding from the National Science Foundation of China (project no. 81473654) and the Special Public Welfare Industry and Scientific Research from the State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine (project no. 201407001-9).
Acknowledgments
This work was partly supported by the Scientific & Technological Cooperation with China Project No. CN 06/2020 of the Austrian Agency for International Cooperation in Education and Research (OEAD) and the Federal Minister of Education, Science, and Research (BMBWF), Austria.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Footnotes
1.^https://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/software/spm12/
2.^http://www.neuro.uni-jena.de/cat/
3.^http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl
References
1
AboM.SenooA.WatanabeS.MiyanoS.DosekiK.SasakiN.et al (2004). Language-related brain function during word repetition in post-stroke aphasics.Neuroreport151891–1894. 10.1097/00001756-200408260-00011
2
AngladeC.ThielA.AnsaldoA. I. (2014). The complementary role of the cerebral hemispheres in recovery from aphasia after stroke: a critical review of literature.Brain Inj.28138–145. 10.3109/02699052.2013.859734
3
BalterM. (2006). Bruce Lahn profile. Links between brain genes, evolution, and cognition challenged.Science3141872. 10.1126/science.314.5807.1872
4
BarlowT. (1877). On a Case of Double Hemiplegia, with Cerebral Symmetrical Lesions.Br Med J.2103–104. 10.1136/bmj.2.865.103
5
BatesE.WilsonS. M.SayginA. P.DickF.SerenoM. I.KnightR. T.et al (2003). Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping. Nat. Neurosci.6, 448–450. 10.1038/nn1050
6
BehrensT. E.BergH. J.JbabdiS.RushworthM. F.WoolrichM. W. (2007). Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations: What can we gain?Neuroimage.34144–155. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.018
7
BehrensT. E.WoolrichM. W.JenkinsonM.Johansen-BergH.NunesR. G.ClareS.et al (2003). Characterization and propagation of uncertainty in diffusion-weighted MR imaging.Magn Reson Med. 501077–1088. 10.1002/mrm.10609
8
BelinP.Van EeckhoutP.ZilboviciusM.RemyP.FrançoisC.GuillaumeS.et al (1996). Recovery from nonfluent aphasia after melodic intonation therapy: a PET study.Neurology. 471504–1511. 10.1212/wnl.47.6.1504
9
BolgerD. J.PerfettiC. A.SchneiderW. (2005). Cross-cultural effect on the brain revisited: universal structures plus writing system variation.Hum Brain Mapp. 2592–104. 10.1002/hbm.20124
10
BuchsbaumB. R.D’EspositoM. (2019). A sensorimotor view of verbal working memory.Cortex.112134–148. 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.11.010
11
ButlerR. A.LambonRalph MAWoollamsA. M. (2014). Capturing multidimensionality in stroke aphasia: mapping principal behavioural components to neural structures.Brain. 1373248–3266. 10.1093/brain/awu286
12
ChangE. F.RaygorK. P.BergerM. S. (2015). Contemporary model of language organization: an overview for neurosurgeons.J. Neurosurg.122250–261. 10.3171/2014.10.Jns132647
13
ChangJ.ZhangH.TanZ.XiaoJ.LiS.GaoY. (2017). Effect of electroacupuncture in patients with post-stroke motor aphasia : Neurolinguistic and neuroimaging characteristics.Wien. Klin. Wochenschr.129102–109. 10.1007/s00508-016-1070-1
14
CoorayC.FeketeK.MikulikR.LeesK. R.WahlgrenN.AhmedN. (2015). Threshold for NIH stroke scale in predicting vessel occlusion and functional outcome after stroke thrombolysis.Int J Stroke.10822–829. 10.1111/ijs.12451
15
CrinionJ.PriceC. J. (2005). Right anterior superior temporal activation predicts auditory sentence comprehension following aphasic stroke.Brain. 1282858–2871. 10.1093/brain/awh659
16
ElkanaO.FrostR.KramerU.Ben-BashatD.SchweigerA. (2013). Cerebral language reorganization in the chronic stage of recovery: a longitudinal fMRI study.Cortex.4971–81. 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.09.001
17
EngelterS. T.GostynskiM.PapaS.FreiM.BornC.Ajdacic-GrossV.et al (2006). Epidemiology of aphasia attributable to first ischemic stroke: incidence, severity, fluency, etiology, and thrombolysis.Stroke. 371379–1384. 10.1161/01.STR.0000221815.64093.8c
18
ForkelS. J.Thiebaut de SchottenM.Dell’AcquaF.KalraL.MurphyD. G.WilliamsS. C.et al (2014). Anatomical predictors of aphasia recovery: a tractography study of bilateral perisylvian language networks.Brain.1372027–2039. 10.1093/brain/awu113
19
FridrikssonJ.YourganovG.BonilhaL.BasilakosA.Den OudenD. B.RordenC. (2016). Revealing the dual streams of speech processing.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.11315108–15113. 10.1073/pnas.1614038114
20
GarrodS.PickeringM. J. (2016). Dual-stream accounts bridge the gap between monkey audition and human language processing: Comment on “Towards a Computational Comparative Neuroprimatology: Framing the language-ready brain” by Michael Arbib.Phys Life Rev.1669–70. 10.1016/j.plrev.2016.01.008
21
GouchaT.ZaccarellaE.FriedericiA. D. (2017). A revival of Homo loquens as a builder of labeled structures: Neurocognitive considerations.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 81213–224. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.01.036
22
HeissW. D.ThielA.KesslerJ.HerholzK. (2003). Disturbance and recovery of language function: correlates in PET activation studies.Neuroimage20S42–S49. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.005
23
HickokG.PoeppelD. (2004). Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language.Cognition9267–99. 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.011
24
HickokG.PoeppelD. (2007). The cortical organization of speech processing.Nat Rev Neurosci.8393–402. 10.1038/nrn2113
25
HillisA. E.KleinmanJ. T.NewhartM.Heidler-GaryJ.GottesmanR.BarkerR. P.et al (2006). Restoring cerebral blood flow reveals neural regions critical for naming,”.The Journal of Neuroscience268069–8073.
26
IvanovaM. V.IsaevD. Y.DragoyO. V.AkininaY. S.PetrushevskiyA. G.FedinaO. N.et al (2016). Diffusion-tensor imaging of major white matter tracts and their role in language processing in aphasia.Cortex85165–181. 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.04.019
27
KiranS.MeierE. L.KapseK. J.GlynnP. A. (2015). Changes in task-based effective connectivity in language networks following rehabilitation in post-stroke patients with aphasia.Front Hum Neurosci.9:316. 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00316
28
KreislerA.GodefroyO.DelmaireC.DebachyB.LeclercqM.PruvoJ.-P.et al (2000). The anatomy of aphasia revisited.Neurology541117–1123. 10.1093/brain/awx363
29
KümmererD.HartwigsenG.KellmeyerP.GlaucheV.MaderI.KlöppelS.et al (2013). Damage to ventral and dorsal language pathways in acute aphasia.Brain136619–629. 10.1093/brain/aws354
30
LeppänenP. H. T.TóthD.HonbolygóF.LohvansuuK.HämäläinenJ. A.DemonetJ. F.et al (2019). Reproducibility of Brain Responses: High for Speech Perception, Low for Reading Difficulties.Sci Rep. 98487. 10.1038/s41598-019-41992-7
31
LukicS.BarbieriE.WangX.CaplanD.KiranS.RappB.et al (2017). Right Hemisphere Grey Matter Volume and Language Functions in Stroke Aphasia.Neural Plast.20175601509. 10.1155/2017/5601509
32
LydenP. D.LuM.LevineS. R.BrottT. G.BroderickJ. (2001). A modified National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale for use in stroke clinical trials: preliminary reliability and validity.Stroke321310–1317. 10.1161/01.str.32.6.1310
33
MarebwaB. K.FridrikssonJ.YourganovG.FeenaughtyL.RordenC.BonilhaL. (2017). Chronic post-stroke aphasia severity is determined by fragmentation of residual white matter networks.Sci Rep.78188. 10.1038/s41598-017-07607-9
34
McKinnonE. T.FridrikssonJ.BasilakosA.HickokG.HillisA. E.SpampinatoM. V.et al (2018). Types of naming errors in chronic post-stroke aphasia are dissociated by dual stream axonal loss.Sci Rep.814352. 10.1038/s41598-018-32457-4
35
MussoM.WeillerC.KiebelS.MüllerS. P.BülauP.RijntjesM. (1999). Training-induced brain plasticity in aphasia.Brain122(Pt 9), 1781–1790. 10.1093/brain/122.9.1781
36
NaeserM. A.MartinP. I.BakerE. H.HodgeS. M.SczerzenieS. E.NicholasM.et al (2004). Overt propositional speech in chronic nonfluent aphasia studied with the dynamic susceptibility contrast fMRI method.Neuroimage2229–41. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.11.016
37
NorthamG. B.AdlerS.EschmannK. C. J.ChongW. K.CowanF. M.BaldewegT. (2018). Developmental conduction aphasia after neonatal stroke.Ann. Neurol.83664–675. 10.1002/ana.25218
38
NouwensF.Visch-BrinkE. G.El HachiouiH.LingsmaH. F.van de Sandt-KoendermanM. W. M. E.DippelD. W. J.et al (2018). Validation of a prediction model for long-term outcome of aphasia after stroke.BMC Neurol.18:170. 10.1186/s12883-018-1174-5
39
PaniE.ZhengX.WangJ.NortonA.SchlaugG. (2016). Right hemisphere structures predict poststroke speech fluency.Neurology.861574–1581. 10.1212/wnl.0000000000002613
40
RossoC.VargasP.ValabregueR.ArbizuC.Henry-AmarF.LegerA.et al (2015). Aphasia severity in chronic stroke patients: a combined disconnection in the dorsal and ventral language pathways.Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair29287–295. 10.1177/1545968314543926
41
RueckertD.SonodaL. I.HayesC.HillD. L.LeachM. O.HawkesD. J. (1999). Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images.IEEE Trans Med Imaging18712–721. 10.1109/42.796284
42
SammlerD.GrosbrasM. H.AnwanderA.BestelmeyerP. E.BelinP. (2015). Dorsal and Ventral Pathways for Prosody.Curr. Biol.253079–3085. 10.1016/j.cub.2015.10.009
43
SaurD.KreherB. W.SchnellS.KümmererD.KellmeyerP.VryM. S.et al (2008). Ventral and dorsal pathways for language.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10518035–18040. 10.1073/pnas.0805234105
44
SaurD.LangeR.BaumgaertnerA.SchraknepperV.WillmesK.RijntjesM.et al (2006). Dynamics of language reorganization after stroke.Brain1291371–1384. 10.1093/brain/aw1090
45
SmithS. M. (2002). Fast robust automated brain extraction.Hum Brain Mapp17143–155. 10.1002/hbm.10062
46
SmithS. M.JenkinsonM.Johansen-BergH.RueckertD.NicholsT. E.MackayC. E.et al (2006). Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data.Neuroimage311487–1505. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.024
47
SmithS. M.JenkinsonM.WoolrichM. W.BeckmannC. F.BehrensT. E.Johansen-BergH.et al (2004). Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL.Neuroimage23S208–S219. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051
48
SmithS. M.NicholsT. E. (2009). Threshold-free cluster enhancement: addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference. Neuroimage44, 83–98. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.061
49
TanL. H.LairdA. R.LiK.FoxP. T. (2005). Neuroanatomical correlates of phonological processing of Chinese characters and alphabetic words: a meta-analysis.Hum Brain Mapp.2583–91. 10.1002/hbm.20134
50
TaoJ.FangY.WuZ.RaoT.SuY.LinL.et al (2014). Community-applied research of a traditional Chinese medicine rehabilitation scheme on Broca’s aphasia after stroke: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials.15290. 10.1186/1745-6215-15-290
51
ThielA.SchumacherB.WienhardK.GairingS.KrachtL. W.WagnerR.et al (2006). Direct demonstration of transcallosal disinhibition in language networks.J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab.261122–1127. 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600350
52
TurkeltaubP. E.CoslettH. B.ThomasA. L.FaseyitanO.BensonJ.NoriseC.et al (2012). The right hemisphere is not unitary in its role in aphasia recovery.Cortex.481179–1186. 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.06.010
53
ValakiC. E.MaestuF.SimosP. G.ZhangW.FernandezA.AmoC. M.et al (2004). Cortical organization for receptive language functions in Chinese, English, and Spanish: a cross-linguistic MEG study.Neuropsychologia42967–979. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.11.019
54
VealeJ. F. (2014). Edinburgh Handedness Inventory - Short Form: a revised version based on confirmatory factor analysis.Laterality.19164–177. 10.1080/1357650X.2013.783045
55
WeillerC.IsenseeC.RijntjesM.HuberW.MüllerS.BierD.et al (1995). Recovery from Wernicke’s aphasia: a positron emission tomographic study.Ann. Neurol.37723–732. 10.1002/ana.410370605
56
WilkeM.LidzbaK. (2007). LI-tool: A new toolbox to assess lateralization in functional MR-data.Journal of Neuroscience Methods.163128–136.
57
WinhuisenL.ThielA.SchumacherB.KesslerJ.RudolfJ.HauptW. F.et al (2005). Role of the contralateral inferior frontal gyrus in recovery of language function in poststroke aphasia: a combined repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and positron emission tomography study.Stroke. 361759–1763. 10.1161/01.STR.0000174487.81126.ef
58
WongP. C.WarrierC. M.PenhuneV. B.RoyA. K.SadehhA.ParrishT. B.et al (2007). Volume of Left Heschl’s Gyrus and Linguistic Pitch Learning.Cerebral Cortex18828–836. 10.1093/cercor/bhm115
59
XingS.LaceyE. H.Skipper-KallalL. M.JiangX.Harris-LoveM. L.ZengJ.et al (2016). Right hemisphere grey matter structure and language outcomes in chronic left hemisphere stroke.Brain.139227–241. 10.1093/brain/awv323
60
YangX. Y.WangL. Q.LiJ. G.LiangN.WangY.LiuJ. P. (2018). Chinese herbal medicine Dengzhan Shengmai capsule as adjunctive treatment for ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Complement Ther Med.3682–89. 10.1016/j.ctim.2017.12.004
61
ZhangQ. S.JiS. R.LiS. L.HeY.JiaG. H.QinJ. T.et al (2005). Reliability and validity of Chinese rehabilitation research center standard aphasia examination.Chin J Rehabil Theory Practice11703–705.
62
ZhaoJ.GuoJ.ZhouF.ShuH. (2011). Time course of Chinese monosyllabic spoken word recognition: evidence from ERP analyses.Neuropsychologia.491761–1770. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.054
63
ZhuD.ChangJ.FreemanS.TanZ.XiaoJ.GaoY.et al (2014). Changes of functional connectivity in the left frontoparietal network following aphasic stroke.Front Behav Neurosci.8:167. 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00167
64
ZhuL.NieY.ChangC.GaoJ. H.NiuZ. (2014). Different patterns and development characteristics of processing written logographic characters and alphabetic words: an ALE meta-analysis.Hum Brain Mapp. 352607–2618. 10.1002/hbm.22354
65
ZündorfI. C.LewaldJ.KarnathH. O. (2016). Testing the dual-pathway model for auditory processing in human cortex.Neuroimage124672–681. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.09.026
Summary
Keywords
aphasia, stroke, language, structural covariation, MRI, right hemisphere
Citation
Fan R, Gao Y, Zhang H, Xin X, Sang F, Tan Z, Zhang B, Li X, Huang X, Li S and Chang J (2021) Lesion Distribution and Early Changes of Right Hemisphere in Chinese Patients With Post-stroke Aphasia. Front. Aging Neurosci. 13:632217. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.632217
Received
22 November 2020
Accepted
16 November 2021
Published
16 December 2021
Volume
13 - 2021
Edited by
Changiz Geula, Northwestern University, United States
Reviewed by
Chen Ding, Yale University, United States; Bertrand Glize, Université de Bordeaux, France
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Fan, Gao, Zhang, Xin, Sang, Tan, Zhang, Li, Huang, Li and Chang.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Shuren Li, shuren.li@meduniwien.ac.atJingling Chang, ear6979@163.com
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.