ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Aging Neurosci., 01 September 2022

Sec. Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias

Volume 14 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.900523

Gender-specific prevalence and risk factors of mild cognitive impairment among older adults in Chongming, Shanghai, China

  • 1. Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China

  • 2. Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences Affiliated Zhoupu Hospital, Shanghai, China

  • 3. Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China

  • 4. Shanghai Health Rehabilitation Hospital, Shanghai, China

  • 5. Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China

Abstract

Objective:

This study explores the gender differences in the prevalence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and the correlation between multiple influencing factors.

Materials and methods:

The sample was comprised of 1325 relatively healthy participants aged ≥ 60 years in a Shanghai community-dwelling (557 males and 768 females). Cognitive function was assessed by Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). The Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) scale was used to assess the activities of daily living.

Results:

The overall prevalence of MCI was 15.2%, with 10.2% in men and 18.9% in women. In older male subjects, those with higher the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) scores [odds ratio (OR) = 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.01–1.14] and hypertension (OR = 2.33, 95% CI = 1.15–4.73) had a higher risk of MCI. female subjects who were illiterate (OR = 2.95, 95% CI = 1.82–4.78), had a farming background (OR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.05–2.72), and a history of stroke (OR = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.07–3.59) had a higher risk of MCI, but this was not true for males. However, Male subjects who never smoked were less likely to have MCI (OR = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.09–0.54). Additionally, the prevalence of MCI was lower in older women with high grip strength (OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.92–0.99) and hyperlipidemia (OR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.22–0.96).

Conclusion:

The prevalence of MCI was higher in the population of elderly women compared to men. Moreover, it was found that members with MCI tended to having higher GDS scores, smoking, and hypertension; whereas a history of farming, illiteracy, stroke, grip strength, and hyperlipidemia were correlated with MCI in women.

Introduction

China has 249 million people aged 60 and over, which accounts for 17.9% of the total population (), indicating a high prevalence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI). With the increase in the aging population worldwide, the number of patients with cognitive impairment is also increasing, putting a heavy burden on families, communities, and health care systems. Accordingly, cognitive impairment has become a global public health problem.

Due to the lack of effective treatment, early intervention is considered the most cost-effective way to manage dementia (). Since MCI is considered the transition stage between undamaged cognitive function and dementia (Winblad et al., 2004), there has been a consensus to focus the main intervention on this population to prevent dementia. However, a few studies investigating the prevalence of MCI in China have inconsistent results, which are estimated to range from 4.5 to 21.5% (; Song et al., 2021). These inconsistencies require further study to arrive at more accurate estimates. Although previous studies have analyzed the association between modifiable risk factors and MCI stratified by gender (Zhang et al., 2019; ), this may affect the exposure of MCI risk factors and the prevalence of MCI due to China’s vast territory, people’s complex lifestyles, extended life span, different diagnostic criteria, and various screening methods. It is estimated that more than 70% of the elderly in China live in suburban communities. Shanghai is one of the most populous megacities in China. Studying the prevalence and influencing factors of MCI in its suburban counties can provide supporting data for the prevention, diagnosis, care, and treatment of MCI. Moreover, the current research conclusions on the gender differences in the prevalence and influencing factors of MCI are still inconsistent. No gender difference in the prevalence of MCI was present in other countries (; ; ). The difference is that the data of China show that the prevalence of MCI in women is higher than that in men (). Understanding the gender differences of MCI may further understand the etiology and prevention of dementia. Attention to the prevalence of MCI and effective risk factor prevention strategies will help reduce the incidence rate of MCI and subsequent dementia.

The authors’ previous studies have shown that both sarcopenia () and obesity () are associated with cognitive impairment. Therefore, this study explores the gender differences in the prevalence of MCI and the correlation between multiple influencing factors. By strengthening the identification of MCI, its related influencing factors can be examined in depth to provide a theoretical basis for the early prevention and identification of MCI to establish an early warning model of MCI.

Materials and methods

Study population

The final analytic sample consisted of 1,325 participants (≥ 60 years old) after excluding 38 individuals (3 had incomplete MMSE data; 4 were unable to perform the physical performance test; 31participants had missing data on covariates or outcomes.). All subjects were invited to participate in a comprehensive geriatric assessment and cognitive function assessment in Chongming District of Shanghai in 2019 and 2020. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) severe cognitive impairment, dementia, mental illness or other neurodegenerative diseases; (2) Inability to communicate with researchers or unwillingness to give informed consent; (3) people with deafness or blindness and cannot complete the assessment; (4) those who cannot complete the grip strength, Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT), and 4-meter walking test. All participants provided informed consent prior to participation. If the participant was illiterate, the informed consent of its legal representative would be sought.

Covariates

Data on sociodemographic characteristics, behavioral characteristics, and disease history have previously been described (through face-to-face questions) (). The questionnaire included questions about age, sex, height, body weight, marital status, illiteracy, living habits (alone or with others), sleep duration, smoking habits (current smoker, never smoking, and past smoker), drinking habits (drinking daily, occasional drinking, past drinking, and never drinking), and household income (< 1,000, 1,000–3,000, 3,000–5,000, and > 5,000 RMB), Physical activity was assessed using the short form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) (). The depressive symptoms were evaluated by the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Subjects with a score of ≥ 11 were considered to have depressive symptoms (Yesavage et al., 1982). Nutrition was evaluated by the Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF) (). Physical performance was assessed by grip strength, a 4-m walking test, and the Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT). The details of the measurement method have been described in the authors’ previous research (). Disease history included type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), hypertension, hyperlipidemia, stroke, gout, anemia, pulmonary disease, biliary tract disease, kidney disease, heart disease, osteoarthritis, cancer, and thyroid disease.

Definition of mild cognitive impairment

This study adopted the MCI diagnostic criteria based on Petersen’s definitions (Petersen et al., 1999): (1) memory complaint; (2) normal activities of daily living; (3) normal general cognitive function; (4) abnormal memory for age; (5) not demented.

Assessment of cognitive function

Cognitive assessment was completed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) () by trained investigators. It includes 30 items, the score ranges from 0 to 30 points, with the higher scores indicating better cognitive performance. The use of MMSE to define MCI is consistent with previous studies (), that is, The cut-off points used for cognitive impairment were as follow: ≤ 17 for illiterate people, ≤ 20 for people with primary school, and ≤ 24 for people with middle school or higher (Zhang et al., 1990). The above cut-off points have been proved to be sensitive and effective in the diagnosis of MCI in Chinese elderly population (Zhang et al., 2006).

Assessment of daily activity ability

The daily activity ability was evaluated using the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scale (IADL) (). It includes 8 items, the score ranges from 0 to 8 points, with the higher scores indicating better daily activity ability. IADL scores ≥ 6 indicates normal daily activity ability ().

Statistical analysis

The following analyses were performed to investigate the prevalence of MCI and the correlation between multiple influencing factors. Normally distributed data were presented as mean ± standard deviation, while non-normally distributed data were presented as median, with the 25–75% interquartile range given in parentheses. Categorical variables were expressed as a percentage (%). The differences according to the characteristics of cognitive status were analyzed using the t-tests, Chi-square tests, and Mann–Whitney U tests. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the factors associated with MCI. Based on previous research, age, marital status, illiteracy, living conditions, farming, Smoking, BMI, IPAQ, and comorbidity status (hypertension, hyperlipidemia, stroke, diabetes) were considered factors potentially associated with MCI. As such, these factors were included as independent variables in the models of the present study. All the statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 21.0, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Ethics

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences and the methods were carried out in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Results

Characteristics of the participants

A total of 1,363 participants were evaluated. Of these, 38were excluded: 3 had incomplete MMSE data; 4 were unable to perform the physical performance test; 31participants had missing data on covariates or outcomes (Figure 1). The final analytic sample consisted of 1,325 participants in the study (mean age, 71.79 ± 5.77 years; 58.0% women), of whom 202 (15.2%) were diagnosed with MCI (57 males and 145 females). Participants were divided into three age groups, 60–69, 70–79, and ≥ 80 years, with 58 (10.5%), 89 (14.2%), and 55 (37.7%) people, respectively. The prevalence increased more steeply with age in females than males (Figure 2). Table 1 presents the characteristics of these participants. Compared to participants with normal cognition, participants with MCI were older, had lower daily activity ability, higher GDS scores, sleep longer, less physical activity, and a higher proportion of illiteracy, widows, living alone, agriculture, low income, and worse physical performance. However, there were some differences when stratified by gender. Males with MCI had a higher proportion of hypertension (77.2% versus 61.8%; P = 0.022) and a higher score of GDS (6.54 ± 4.81 versus 5.50 ± 4.55; P = 0.003), but these results were not statistically significant in females (P > 0.05). Females with MCI had longer sleep time, lower daily activity levels, and were more likely to be farmers and illiterate.

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 2

TABLE 1


VariablesTotal
(n = 1325)
Male
(n = 557)
Female
(n = 768)
Normal cognition
(n = 1123)
Mild cognitive impairment
(n = 202)
P-valueNormal cognition
(n = 500)
Mild cognitive impairment
(n = 57)
P-valueNormal cognition
(n = 623)
Mild cognitive impairment
(n = 145)
P-value
Age (year)71.27 ± 5.3874.66 ± 6.96<0.00171.70 ± 5.4873.72 ± 7.020.00170.93 ± 5.2875.03 ± 6.92<0.001
BMI(kg/m2)23.69 ± 3.4523.68 ± 3.430.96323.40 ± 3.3323.39 ± 3.830.98923.92 ± 3.5323.79 ± 3.270.680
IADL (score)7.79 ± 0.637,63 ± 0.670.0017.82 ± 0.477.68 ± 0.610.0397.77 ± 0.737.61 ± 0.690.021
MNA-SF (score)12.79 ± 1.5112.68 ± 1.440.32712.82 ± 1.4412.51 ± 1.660.12712.76 ± 1.5612.74 ± 1.340.886
GDS (score)5.50 ± 4.556.81 ± 5.39<0.0014.85 ± 4.016.54 ± 4.810.0036.02 ± 4.896.92 ± 5.610.053
Sleep duration(hour)8.40 ± 1.438.79 ± 1.550.0018.43 ± 1.398.61 ± 1.490.3348.38 ± 1.458.85 ± 1.570.001
IPAQ (Met/wk)5255(2226,10080)3864(1647,8201)0.0034988(2079, 8966)3222(1533, 8652)0.1675639(2373, 10920)3990(1908, 7989)0.003
Illiteracy (%)98(8.7%)68(33.7%)<0.00121(4.2%)5(8.8%)0.12177(12.4%)63(43.4%)<0.001
Widowed(%)191(17.0%)75(37.1%)<0.00141(8.2%)11(19.3%)0.006150(24.1%)64(44.1%)<0.001
Living alone (%)166(14.8%)61(30.2%)<0.00150(10.0%)14(24.6%)0.001116(18.6%)47(32.4%)<0.001
Farming (%)565(50.3%)135(66.8%)<0.001198(39.6%)23(40.4%)0.913367(58.9%)112(77.2%)<0.001
Monthly income (%)<0.0010.1210.004
< 100070(6.2%)29(14.4%)23(4.6%)6(10.5%)47(7.5%)23(15.9%)
1000-3000683(60.8%)131(64.9%)286(57.2%)36(63.2%)397(63.7%)95(65.5%)
3000-5000160(14.2%)18(8.9%)80(16.0%)7(12.3%)80(12.8%)11(7.6%)
>5000210(18.7%)24(11.9%)111(22.2%)8(14.0%)99(15.9%)16(11.0%)
Smoking (%)0.0140.0750.495
Current smokers178(15.9%)28(13.9%)174(34.8%)28(49.1%)4(0.6%)0(0.0%)
Never smokers757(67.4%)155(76.7%)140(28.0%)10(17.5%)617(99.0%)145(100%)
Ever smokers188(16.7%)19(9.4%)186(37.2%)19(33.3%)2(0.3%)0(0.0%)
Drinking (%)0.0650.1680.126
Daily drinkers171(15.2%)29(14.4%)150(30.0%)18(31.6%)21(3.4%)11(7.6%)
Occasional drinkers152(13.5%)27(13.4%)91(18.2%)16(28.1%)61(9.8%)11(7.6%)
Former drinkers135(12.0%)12(5.9%)111(22.2%)7(12.3%)24(3.9%)5(3.4%)
Never drinkers665(59.2%)134(66.3%)148(29.6%)16(28.1%)517(83.0%)118(81.4%)
physical performance
Grip strength (kg)23.95 ± 8.9119.10 ± 8.88<0.00130.31 ± 8.2227.01 ± 9.650.00518.85 ± 5.5015.99 ± 6.28<0.001
4-meter walking test (m/s)1.11 ± 0.230.94 ± 0.25<0.0011.15 ± 0.251.02 ± 0.250.0011.07 ± 0.210.92 ± 0.25<0.001
TUGT (s)9.63 ± 3.3111.9 ± 4.76<0.0019.56 ± 3.3611.04 ± 3.700.0029.68 ± 3.2812.24 ± 5.09<0.001
Diseases (%)
Diabetes (%)178(15.9%)32(15.8%)0.99778(15.6%)9(15.8%)0.970100(16.1%)23(15.9%)0.955
Hypertension (%)683(60.8%)139(68.8%)0.031309(61.8%)44(77.2%)0.022374(60.0%)95(65.5%)0.222
Hyperlipidemia (%)140(12.5%)17(8.4%)0.10056(11.2%)7(12.3%)0.81184(13.5%)10(6.9%)0.029
Stroke(%)114(10.2%)29(14.4%)0.07651(10.2%)5(8.8%)0.73463(10.1%)24(16.6%)0.028
Gout (%)66(5.9%)10(5.0%)0.61343(8.6%)5(8.9%)0.93423(3.7%)5(3.4%)0.888
Anemia (%)51(4.5%)13(6.4%)0.24818(3.6%)3(5.3%)0.53233(5.3%)10(6.9%)0.450
Pulmonary disease (%)96(8.5%)15(7.4%)0.59658(11.6%)6(10.5%)0.81038(6.1%)9(6.2%)0.961
Biliary tract disease (%)166(14.8%)32(15.8%)0.69749(9.8%)7(12.3%)0.555117(18.8%)25(17.2%)0.667
Kidney disease (%)117(10.4%)12(5.9%)0.04870(14.0%)5(8.8%)0.27347(7.5%)7(4.8%)0.249
Heart disease (%)359(32.0%)73(36.1%)0.244142(28.4%)19(33.3%)0.436217(34.8%)54(37.2%)0.584
Thyroid disease (%)44(3.9%)10(5.0%)0.49411(2.2%)0(0.0%)0.25833(5.3%)10(6.9%)0.450
Osteoarthritis(%)179(15.9%)39(19.3%)0.23568(13.6%)11(19.3%)0.243111(17.8%)28(19.3%)0.674
Cancer(%)44(3.9%)6(3.0%)0.51526(86.7%)4(7.0%)056518(2.9%)2(1.4%)0.304

Baseline characteristics of study participants with normal cognition vs. mild cognitive impairment.

BMI, Body Mass Index; MNA, Mini Nutritional Assessment; TUGT, Time Up and Go Test; GDS, Geriatric Depression Scale; IADL, Instrumental Activity of Daily Living; IPAQ, International Physical Activity Questionnaires.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of associated factors for mild cognitive impairment

Results from univariate and multivariate logistic regression models for factors related to MCI in 557 males and 768 females are reported in Tables 2 and 3, respectively. After adjusting for potential confounders, in older male subjects, those with higher GDS scores [odds ratio (OR) = 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.01–1.14] and hypertension (OR = 2.33, 95% CI = 1.15–4.73) were associated with MCI. Male subjects who never smoked were less likely to have MCI than older male subjects who currently smoked (OR = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.09–0.54). Female subjects who were illiterate (OR = 2.95, 95% CI = 1.82–4.78), had a background in farming (OR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.05–2.72), and had high grip strength (OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.92–0.99) were associated with MCI, but this was not true for males. The OR and 95% CI in the adjusted model for the factors statistically significantly associated with MCI were 0.45 (0.22–0.96) and 1.96 (1.07–3.59) for hyperlipidemia and stroke, respectively, in females.

TABLE 2

VariableUnivariate Odds Ratio (95% CI)P-valueAdjusted Model Odds Ratio (95% CI)P-value
All sample (n = 557)
Age (year)
60-69 (n = 221)1.0 (referent)1.0 (referent)
70-79 (n = 279)1.14(0.62–2.11)0.6781.08(0.54–2.15)0.823
≥ 80 (n = 57)2.54(1.13–5.71)0.0241.44(0.49–4.27)0.507
IADL0.63(0.40–0.99)0.0440.83(0.47–1.44)0.501
GDS1.09(1.03–1.15)0.0041.07(1.01–1.14)0.033
Illiteracy (n = 26)2.19(0.79–6.06)0.1301.74(0.53–5.69)0.358
Widowed (n = 52)2.68(1.29–5.56)0.0081.15(0.33–4.01)0.825
Living alone (n = 64)2.93(1.50–5.73)0.0021.86(0.64–5.36)0.252
Farming (n = 221)1.03(0.59–1.80)0.9130.70(0.36–1.35)0.283
Monthly income
< 1,000 (n = 29)1.0 (referent)1.0 (referent)
1,000–2,999 (n = 322)0.48(0.18–1.26)0.1380.44(0.14–1.36)0.152
3,000–5,000 (n = 87)0.34(0.10–1.10)0.0710.29(0.07–1.16)0.080
>5,000 (n = 119)0.28(0.09–0.87)0.0280.28(0.07–1.12)0.071
Smoking
Current smokers (n = 202)1.0 (referent)
Never smokers (n = 150)0.44(0.21–0.95)0.0350.22(0.09–0.54)0.001
Ever smokers (n = 205)0.64(0.34–1.18)0.1500.47(0.24–0.95)0.036
Grip strength0.95(0.92–0.99)0.0050.97(0.93–1.01)0.105
4-meter walking test0.16(0.05–0.46)0.0010.23(0.04–1.23)0.085
TUGT1.10(1.03-1.17)0.0050.98(0.88–1.09)0.670
Hypertension (n = 353)2.09(1.10–3.99)0.0252.33(1.15–4.73)0.020
Hyperlipidemia (n = 63)1.11(0.48–2.56)0.8111.08(0.42–2.79)0.879
Stroke (n = 56)0.85(0.32–2.22)0.7340.72(0.25–2.12)0.554

Unadjusted and Adjusted Model for Factors Related to MCI in the male.

TUGT, time up and go; OR, Odds Ratio; CI, confidence interval; IPAQ, international physical activity questionnaires; Adjusted model: Adjusted for age, BMI, IADL, GDS, IPAQ, Illiteracy, Widowed, Living alone, Farming, Monthly income, Smoking, Grip strength, 4-meter walking test, TUGT, Hypertension, Hyperlipidemia, Stroke, diabetes.

TABLE 3

VariableUnivariate Odds Ratio (95% CI)P-valueAdjusted Model Odds Ratio (95% CI)P-value
All sample (n = 768)
Age (year)
60-69 (n = 332)1.0 (referent)1.0 (referent)
70-79 (n = 347)1.64(1.06–2.52)0.0261.02(0.62–1.67)0.939
≥ 80 (n = 89)7.35(4.31–12.52)<0.0011.81(0.90–3.63)0.097
IADL0.79(0.63–0.98)0.0281.26(0.93–1.72)0.142
GDS1.03(0.99–1.07)0.0540.99(0.95–1.03)0.608
Sleep duration1.22(1.08–1.38)0.0011.05(0.92–1.20)0.456
IPAQ0.96(0.92–0.99)0.0010.98(0.96–1.09)0.131
Illiteracy (n = 140)5.45(3.63–8.18)<0.0012.95(1.82–4.78)<0.001
Widowed (n = 214)2.49(1.71–3.63)<0.0011.50(0.78–2.88)0.226
Living alone (n = 163)2.10(1.40–3.13)<0.0010.85(0.41–1.72)0.642
Farming (n = 479)2.37(1.56–3.60)<0.0011.69(1.05–2.72)0.031
Monthly income
< 1,000 (n = 70)1.0 (referent)1.0 (referent)
1,000-2,999 (n = 492)0.49(0.28–0.85)0.0100.67(0.35–1.30)0.235
3,000-5,000 (n = 91)0.28(0.13–0.63)0.0020.53(0.21–1.34)0.179
>5,000 (n = 115)0.33(0.16–0.68)0.0030.65(0.28–1.55)0.330
Grip strength0.91(0.88–0.94)<0.0010.96(0.92–0.99)0.036
4-meter walking test0.06(0.03–0.13)<0.0010.40(0.11–1.42)0.156
TUGT1.16(1.11–1.22)<0.0011.05(0.98–1.12)0.142
Hypertension (n = 469)1.27(0.87–1.85)0.2231.15(0.74–1.81)0.537
Hyperlipidemia (n = 94)0.48(0.24–0.94)0.0330.45(0.22–0.96)0.038
Stroke (n = 87)1.76(1.06–2.94)0.0291.96(1.07–3.59)0.030

Unadjusted and adjusted model for factors related to MCI in the female.

TUGT, time up and go; OR, Odds Ratio; CI, confidence interval; IPAQ, international physical activity questionnaires; Adjusted model: Adjusted for age, BMI, IADL, GDS, Sleep duration, IPAQ, Illiteracy, Widowed, Living alone, Farming, Monthly income, Smoking, Grip strength, 4-meter walking test, TUGT, Hypertension, Hyperlipidemia, Stroke, diabetes.

Discussion

This study estimates the prevalence of MCI and the factors associated with MCI in a suburb-dwelling population of elderly persons aged 60 and older in China. The overall prevalence of MCI was 15.2%, with 10.2% in men and 18.9% in women. After adjustment for potential confounders, the GDS scores, smoking, and hypertension were directly associated with the prevalence of MCI in men. Moreover, grip strength, being illiterate, having a background in farming, hyperlipidemia, and stroke were associated with the prevalence of MCI in women.

Prevalence of mild cognitive impairment in suburb-dwelling residents

A recent meta-analysis showed that the prevalence of MCI in the Chinese elderly was 15.2% (), which was consistent with the results of the present study. A recent cross-sectional survey on the prevalence of MCI in women showed that the prevalence of MCI was 21.5% (Song et al., 2021), while another study found that the prevalence of cognitive impairment was 26.1% in men and 30.5% in women (). Additionally, a cross-sectional study found that the prevalence of MCI was 19.8% for men and 26.1% for women (Zhang et al., 2019). In the study by , the MCI prevalence was 8.2% in males and 13.1% in females. These large differences in prevalence are likely due to diversity in population structure, screening tools, and diagnostic criteria. These inconsistencies necessitate further study to yield a more accurate estimate.

Modifiable lifestyle and physical performance factors related to mild cognitive impairment in suburb-dwelling residents

The present study found that GDS scores were correlated with the prevalence of MCI. This was consistent with the results of previous studies (Vega and Newhouse, 2014). There is increasing evidence that depression strongly and independently accelerates the progression from MCI to dementia. In individuals with MCI, depressive symptoms mean a 2–4 fold increase in the risk of progression to dementia (Van der Mussele et al., 2014). In men, an association was found between smoking and MCI. This result was consistent with previous work that reported smoking was associated with cognitive impairment (). Regarding the relationship between smoking and MCI, further studies on biomarker assessments of smoking are needed to illustrate the true association between smoking and MCI in the Chinese population. This result also showed that MCI was significantly associated with a background in farming and illiteracy in women. A systematic review showed that those who have a predominantly manual occupation throughout life have a greater risk of cognitive impairment and/or dementia than those in intellectually demanding occupations (). Illiterate women were more than twice as likely to have MCI than educated women. Previous studies have found that women with little formal education have a higher risk of dementia than men with similar educational backgrounds (Zhang et al., 1990; ; ). Differences in the quality of education may contribute to an increased risk of dementia in women compared with men. Low-educated women are more likely to have poorer career achievement, lower income, poorer health, less leisure opportunities, and poorer cognitive outcomes than low-educated men (; Sharp and Gatz, 2011). Compared with men, women have less access to education, and when women have access to education, it differs in quality. Zhang et al. (2006) point out that before 1950, only women belonging to the highest social classes could receive education in China. Additionally, a relationship was found between MCI and grip strength in women, as was found in previous studies (). This simple measure may be useful for future research on the relationship between cognitive function and physical performance.

Specific diseases associated with mild cognitive impairment in suburb-dwelling residents

As demonstrated in the present study, hypertension was associated with MCI in men, but not in women. This finding was in accordance with previous studies (Wu et al., 2016; ). The potential gender differences between hypertension and cognition are not fully understood (). It may be that the women in the present study were all menopausal. Previous evidence suggests that older postmenopausal women have a lower risk of cardiometabolic disease because of their favorable hormonal and metabolic profile (Regensteiner et al., 2015), which may mitigate cognitive impairment caused by hypertension. However, the observational studies conducted for the present study could not provide insight into the underlying biological mechanisms. Accordingly, more research should be conducted to explore possible explanations for the underlying gender differences. In addition, similar to previous studies (; ), the present study found no significant correlation between hyperlipidemia and the prevalence of MCI in the elderly. Interestingly, when stratified by gender, the association between hyperlipidemia and MCI was only significant in women, and women with hyperlipidemia had higher cognitive function than women without hyperlipidemia. In the study conducted by , hyperlipidemia was reported as a protective factor for MCI in women. The relationship between hyperlipidemia and MCI prevalence remains controversial. Studies have shown that a reduced risk of cognitive impairment was associated with higher serum cholesterol levels (). In contrast, earlier research found significantly higher cholesterol levels in older adults with cognitive impairment and suggested that cholesterol-lowering treatments, such as lipid-lowering drugs, may have cardiovascular benefits while preventing cognitive impairment (Vance, 2012). However, the underlying mechanism of the interaction between gender and hyperlipidemia and cognitive impairment remains unclear. Further prospective studies are needed to explore the sex differences with the association of hyperlipidemia with MCI. A recent meta-analysis showed that stroke was a risk factor for dementia, which was consistent with the results of the present study (). Similarly, a study examining gender differences in cognitive outcomes after stroke found that women had significantly worse cognitive outcomes than men (). Since only a few previous works investigated the gender differences between stroke and MCI, further research is needed to explore the potential pathological associations.

Strengths and limitations

This study presents several strengths. First, the study was conducted on a relatively large sample of well-characterized suburban elderly men and women who had lived in a particular geographic area for a long time. Second, the participants were from suburban areas, and their lifestyles were more active, which may have been different from subjects in other areas. However, this study has some limitations that must be addressed. First, because this is a cross-sectional study, a causal relationship of the identified associated factors could not be established. Second, all participants in this study were relatively healthy. We did not include those who were hospitalized, or those who were bedridden with severe illness and could not be tested on-site, and those who refused to participate in the program. This choice could constitute a selective survival and a healthy selection bias. Third, although there were no patients with depression in our population, we found that men with higher GDS scores had worse cognitive function, which we also adjusted as an adjustment variable in multivariate regression. In the future, we will continue to follow up to observe the impact of depression on cognitive function.

Conclusion

In summary, in this study, 15.2% of adults aged 60 and older were found to have mild cognitive impairment. The prevalence of MCI is shown to be higher in females compared to males for the elderly population. Furthermore, GDS scores, smoking, farming, illiteracy, grip strength, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and stroke may have different associations with MCI in different genders. Additional studies with longer follow-up periods are needed to confirm these associations and to further examine other lifestyle behaviors and diseases that may contribute to MCI. This study may be of great significance to the prevention of MCI and ensuring a healthy aging policy.

Statements

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Ethics statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

YY, QG, and ML contributed to the conception and design of the study. YL wrote the first draft of the manuscript. PH organized the database. XY performed the statistical analysis. XC, FW, JuL, YZ, and ZZ wrote sections of the manuscript. XL, JiL, RL, BW, and CX participate in the survey. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 82172552), the Hygiene and Health Commission of Shanghai municipality (2019HP76), the Scientific Research Foundation of SUMHS (SSF-22-03-002), and the Scientific Research Foundation of SUMHS (SSF-21-03-005).

Acknowledgments

We thank Bin Mao and Yue Gu from the Chongming public health center for providing place and organization.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1

    AtkinsonH. H.RappS. R.WilliamsonJ. D.LovatoJ.AbsherJ. R.GassM.et al (2010). The relationship between cognitive function and physical performance in older women: Results from the Women’s Health Initiative Memory study.J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.65300–306. 10.1093/gerona/glp149

  • 2

    AuB.Dale-McGrathS.TierneyM. C. (2017). Sex differences in the prevalence and incidence of mild cognitive impairment: A meta-analysis.Ageing Res. Rev.35176–199. 10.1016/j.arr.2016.09.005

  • 3

    ChenX.HanP.YuX.ZhangY.SongP.LiuY.et al (2021). Relationships between sarcopenia, depressive symptoms, and mild cognitive impairment in Chinese community-dwelling older adults.J. Affect. Disord.28671–77. 10.1016/j.jad.2021.02.067

  • 4

    DengY.ZhaoS.ChengG.YangJ.LiB.XuK.et al (2021). The prevalence of mild cognitive impairment among Chinese people: A meta-analysis.Neuroepidemiology5579–91. 10.1159/000512597

  • 5

    DongL.BricenoE.MorgensternL. B.LisabethL. D. (2020). Poststroke cognitive outcomes: Sex differences and contributing factors.J. Am. Heart Assoc.9:e16683. 10.1161/JAHA.120.016683

  • 6

    FolsteinM. F.FolsteinS. E.McHughP. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.J. Psychiatr. Res.12189–198. 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6

  • 7

    FuJ.LiuQ.DuY.ZhuY.SunC.LinH.et al (2020). Age- and sex-specific prevalence and modifiable risk factors of mild cognitive impairment among older adults in china: A population-based observational study.Front. Aging Neurosci.12:578742. 10.3389/fnagi.2020.578742

  • 8

    GanguliM.FuB.SnitzB. E.HughesT. F.ChangC. C. (2013). Mild cognitive impairment: Incidence and vascular risk factors in a population-based cohort.Neurology802112–2120. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318295d776

  • 9

    GraciaR. A.SantabarbaraS. J.LopezA. R.TomasA. C.MarcosA. G. (2016). [Occupation and risk of cognitive impairment and dementia in people in over 55 years: A systematic review, Spain].Rev. Esp. Salud Publica90e1–e15.

  • 10

    IadecolaC.YaffeK.BillerJ.BratzkeL. C.FaraciF. M.GorelickP. B.et al (2016). Impact of hypertension on cognitive function: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association.Hypertension68e67–e94. 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000053

  • 11

    JiaL.DuY.ChuL.ZhangZ.LiF.LyuD.et al (2020). Prevalence, risk factors, and management of dementia and mild cognitive impairment in adults aged 60 years or older in China: A cross-sectional study.Lancet Public Health5e661–e671. 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30185-7

  • 12

    JiangC. Q.XuL.LamT. H.ZhangW. S.LiuB.LinJ. M.et al (2009). [Effect of physical activity strength on the diabetes mellitus prevalence in the elderly under the influence of International Physical Activity Questionnaire].Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi30462–465.

  • 13

    KaiserM. J.BauerJ. M.RamschC.UterW.GuigozY.CederholmT.et al (2009). Validation of the mini nutritional assessment short-form (MNA-SF): A practical tool for identification of nutritional status.J. Nutr. Health Aging13782–788. 10.1007/s12603-009-0214-7

  • 14

    KimM.ParkJ. M. (2017). Factors affecting cognitive function according to gender in community-dwelling elderly individuals.Epidemiol. Health39:e2017054. 10.4178/epih.e2017054

  • 15

    LaunerL. J.AndersenK.DeweyM. E.LetenneurL.OttA.AmaducciL. A.et al (1999). Rates and risk factors for dementia and Alzheimer’s disease: Results from EURODEM pooled analyses. EURODEM Incidence Research Group and Work Groups. European Studies of Dementia.Neurology5278–84. 10.1212/WNL.52.1.78

  • 16

    LawtonM. P.BrodyE. M. (1969). Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living.Gerontologist9179–186. 10.1093/geront/9.3_Part_1.179

  • 17

    LiJ.WangY. J.ZhangM.XuZ. Q.GaoC. Y.FangC. Q.et al (2011). Vascular risk factors promote conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer disease.Neurology761485–1491. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318217e7a4

  • 18

    LiuY.MaW.LiM.HanP.CaiM.WangF.et al (2021). Relationship between physical performance and mild cognitive impairment in Chinese community-dwelling older adults.Clin. Interv. Aging16119–127. 10.2147/CIA.S288164

  • 19

    LivingstonG.SommerladA.OrgetaV.CostafredaS. G.HuntleyJ.AmesD.et al (2017). Dementia prevention, intervention, and care.Lancet3902673–2734. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31363-6

  • 20

    LvY. B.YinZ. X.CheiC. L.BrasherM. S.ZhangJ.KrausV. B.et al (2016). Serum cholesterol levels within the high normal range are associated with better cognitive performance among Chinese elderly.J. Nutr. Health Aging20280–287. 10.1007/s12603-016-0701-6

  • 21

    LyuJ.KimH. Y. (2016). Gender-specific incidence and predictors of cognitive impairment among older Koreans: Findings from a 6-year prospective cohort study.Psychiatry Investig.13473–479. 10.4306/pi.2016.13.5.473

  • 22

    MaW.ZhangH.WuN.LiuY.HanP.WangF.et al (2021). Relationship between obesity-related anthropometric indicators and cognitive function in Chinese suburb-dwelling older adults.PLoS One16:e258922. 10.1371/journal.pone.0258922

  • 23

    NagamatsuL. S.ChanA.DavisJ. C.BeattieB. L.GrafP.VossM. W.et al (2013). Physical activity improves verbal and spatial memory in older adults with probable mild cognitive impairment: A 6-month randomized controlled trial.J. Aging Res.2013:861893. 10.1155/2013/861893

  • 24

    National Bureau of Statistics of China (2021). China statistical yearbook 2019. Available online at: http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/

  • 25

    OttA.van RossumC. T.van HarskampF.van de MheenH.HofmanA.BretelerM. M. (1999). Education and the incidence of dementia in a large population-based study: The Rotterdam study.Neurology52663–666. 10.1212/WNL.52.3.663

  • 26

    OvertonM.PihlsgardM.ElmstahlS. (2019). Prevalence and incidence of mild cognitive impairment across subtypes, age, and sex.Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord.47219–232. 10.1159/000499763

  • 27

    PetersenR. C.SmithG. E.WaringS. C.IvnikR. J.TangalosE. G.KokmenE. (1999). Mild cognitive impairment: Clinical characterization and outcome.Arch. Neurol.56303–308. 10.1001/archneur.56.3.303

  • 28

    RegensteinerJ. G.GoldenS.HuebschmannA. G.Barrett-ConnorE.ChangA. Y.ChyunD.et al (2015). Sex differences in the cardiovascular consequences of diabetes mellitus: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association.Circulation1322424–2447. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000343

  • 29

    SharpE. S.GatzM. (2011). Relationship between education and dementia: An updated systematic review.Alzheimer Dis. Assoc. Disord.25289–304. 10.1097/WAD.0b013e318211c83c

  • 30

    SongM.WangY. M.WangR.XuS. J.YuL. L.WangL.et al (2021). Prevalence and risks of mild cognitive impairment of Chinese community-dwelling women aged above 60 years: A cross-sectional study.Arch. Womens Ment. Health24903–911. 10.1007/s00737-021-01137-0

  • 31

    Van der MusseleS.FransenE.StruyfsH.LuyckxJ.MarienP.SaerensJ.et al (2014). Depression in mild cognitive impairment is associated with progression to Alzheimer’s disease: A longitudinal study.J. Alzheimers Dis.421239–1250. 10.3233/JAD-140405

  • 32

    VanceJ. E. (2012). Dysregulation of cholesterol balance in the brain: Contribution to neurodegenerative diseases.Dis. Model. Mech.5746–755. 10.1242/dmm.010124

  • 33

    VegaJ. N.NewhouseP. A. (2014). Mild cognitive impairment: Diagnosis, longitudinal course, and emerging treatments.Curr. Psychiatry Rep.16:490. 10.1007/s11920-014-0490-8

  • 34

    WinbladB.PalmerK.KivipeltoM.JelicV.FratiglioniL.WahlundL. O.et al (2004). Mild cognitive impairment–beyond controversies, towards a consensus: Report of the International Working Group on mild cognitive impairment.J. Intern. Med.256240–246. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01380.x

  • 35

    WuL.HeY.JiangB.LiuM.WangJ.YangS.et al (2016). The association between the prevalence, treatment and control of hypertension and the risk of mild cognitive impairment in an elderly urban population in China.Hypertens. Res.39367–375. 10.1038/hr.2015.146

  • 36

    YesavageJ. A.BrinkT. L.RoseT. L.LumO.HuangV.AdeyM.et al (1982). Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: A preliminary report.J. Psychiatr. Res.1737–49. 10.1016/0022-3956(82)90033-4

  • 37

    ZhangM. Y.KatzmanR.SalmonD.JinH.CaiG. J.WangZ. Y.et al (1990). The prevalence of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease in Shanghai, China: Impact of age, gender, and education.Ann. Neurol.27428–437. 10.1002/ana.410270412

  • 38

    ZhangY.GuanY.ShiZ.YueW.LiuS.LiuS.et al (2019). Sex differences in the prevalence of and risk factors for cognitive impairment no dementia among the elderly in a rural area of northern China: A population-based cross-sectional study.Neuroepidemiology5225–31. 10.1159/000493141

  • 39

    ZhangZ. X.ZahnerG. E.RomanG. C.LiuX. H.WuC. B.HongZ.et al (2006). Socio-demographic variation of dementia subtypes in China: Methodology and results of a prevalence study in Beijing, Chengdu, Shanghai, and Xian.Neuroepidemiology27177–187. 10.1159/000096131

Summary

Keywords

mild cognitive impairment, prevalence, risk factors, gender differences, older adults

Citation

Liu Y, Yu X, Han P, Chen X, Wang F, Lian X, Li J, Li R, Wang B, Xu C, Li J, Zheng Y, Zhang Z, Li M, Yu Y and Guo Q (2022) Gender-specific prevalence and risk factors of mild cognitive impairment among older adults in Chongming, Shanghai, China. Front. Aging Neurosci. 14:900523. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.900523

Received

20 March 2022

Accepted

15 August 2022

Published

01 September 2022

Volume

14 - 2022

Edited by

Ondrej Bezdicek, Charles University, Czechia

Reviewed by

Chunbo Li, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China; Shiwei Duan, Zhejiang University City College, China; Xiaoniu Liang, Fudan University, China

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Ying Yu, Qi Guo,

†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

This article was submitted to Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias, a section of the journal Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics