Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Aging Neurosci.

Sec. Parkinson’s Disease and Aging-related Movement Disorders

Separating Cognitive and Motor Contributions to iADL Difficulties in Parkinson's Disease

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Krembil Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
  • 2Toronto Western Hospital Krembil Neuroscience Centre, Toronto, Canada
  • 3University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and dementia are distinguished by whether cognitive deficits interfere with independent performance of instrumental activities of daily living (iADLs). In Parkinson's disease (PD) this distinction is challenging due to the combined impact of motor and cognitive symptoms on autonomy. To address this, we examine two methods aimed at isolating these contributions using the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ): 1) a modified scoring method that classifies items as motor or cognitive to compute a ratio of the two contributors (FAQQ), and 2) a novel, extended FAQ that captures patients' and care-partners' perspective to elucidate the cognitive burden experienced. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of PD patients (n=283) prior to Deep Brain Stimulation. We extracted ratings from the standardized and extended FAQ, cognitive diagnoses [PD-MCI: n=164; cognitively normal (PD-CN) n=119], neuropsychological test scores, and demographic and clinical variables. We examined the degree to which respondents attributed iADL difficulties to motor and cognitive symptoms, and whether these ratings matched the modified scoring method's categorization. To validate this scoring method in our sample, we examined each standardized FAQ item's relationship with measures of motor symptoms (UPDRS-III) and global cognition (DRS-II). Lastly, we derived a Reported Cognitive Burden (RCB) score from the extended FAQ and examined how it, and the FAQQ, relate to cognitive status (PD-CN vs PD-MCI) and performance on neuropsychological tests. Results: Patients and care-partners reported that iADLs were more limited by motor symptoms, even for items categorized as "cognitive." Regression models did not achieve the same item classification as prior research using the modified scoring method. The RCB, but not the FAQQ, was higher in PD-MCI than PD-CN and related to performance in attention and executive domains regardless of who provided the ratings. Conclusion: Patient's and care-partner's appraisal of the source of iADL difficulties was inconsistent with previous categorization of FAQ items in patients with more advanced PD. Our novel RCB offers a sensitive means of detecting mild functional changes related to cognition even in the presence of highly disabling motor symptoms, and may aid in establishing cognitive diagnoses in PD and other neurodegenerative disorders.

Keywords: cognitive diagnosis, Daily functioning, informant questionnaire, neuropsychological assessment, Self-report questionnaire

Received: 26 Oct 2025; Accepted: 08 Dec 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Ravikumar, Statucka and Cohn. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Melanie Cohn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.