ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Aging Neurosci.
Sec. Parkinson’s Disease and Aging-related Movement Disorders
Privacy and Personalisation: Predicting Parkinson's Disease Severity from Real-World Gait with Federated Learning
Chloe Hanna Louise Hinchliffe 1
Hugo Hiden 2
Lisa Alcock 1,3
Rachael A Lawson 1,3,4
Alison J Yarnall 1,3,4
Lynn Rochester 1,3,4
Silvia Del Din 1,3
Paul Watson 3,2
1. Newcastle University Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
2. School of Computing Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
3. National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
4. Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract
Introduction: Cloud-based artificial intelligence (AI) combined with smart-health technology presents a powerful tool to passively monitor disease severity. However, current methods raise privacy concerns as they require transmitting patient data to the cloud. A potential solution is Federated Learning (FL), which only shares the weights of locally trained neural networks (NNs) instead of user data. Here, we simulated an FL system to demonstrate its application for evaluating Parkinson's disease (PD) severity in a smart-home scenario. Methods: Retrospective data including 89 people with PD wore an accelerometer on the lower-back at home for 7 days at 18-month intervals over 6 years. Patient characteristics (age, sex, and body mass index) and clinical measures of PD were additionally collected, including the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS)-Part III. Real-world daily gait measures along with these patient characteristics were used to predict the MDS-UPDRS-III score. For FL, a local model was trained for each participant, and a global model (an aggregation of these local models) was tested on unseen participants. Results: The performance of a simulated FL system was compared with that of a traditional Machine Learning (ML) approach in which patient data were shared. The traditional ML approach had a mean absolute error (MAE) of 10.43. The global FL model had a similar MAE of 10.22 but was underfitted, and the mean MAE of the local, personalised models was 4.83. Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis showed that while the participants' age and sex were very important in traditional ML, this was not the case for the local FL models, leading to a decrease in global model performance. Here, we show that reserving a small number of participants from the system and including them in training data for all local models restored the importance of these features and improved global FL performance (MAE=9.26) but reduced local performance (MAE=6.83). Conclusions: This exploratory study shows that our proposed approach enables FL to achieve similar accuracy to traditional Machine Learning without sharing any patient data but with costs to the local performance, leading towards a smart-home system that prioritises personalisation and patient privacy.
Summary
Keywords
Digital Wearables, Edge device, Explainable AI, Federated learning, Gait, IMUs, Internet of Things (IoT), Parkinson's disease
Received
12 December 2025
Accepted
17 February 2026
Copyright
© 2026 Hinchliffe, Hiden, Alcock, Lawson, Yarnall, Rochester, Del Din and Watson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Chloe Hanna Louise Hinchliffe; Silvia Del Din
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.