Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Aging Neurosci.

Sec. Parkinson’s Disease and Aging-related Movement Disorders

This article is part of the Research TopicParkinson Disease: Current findings and challenges in diagnosing and treating motor and non-motor symptomsView all 16 articles

Characterizing Motor–Cognitive Associations in Parkinson's Disease Using Digital Assessments

Provisionally accepted
Avigail  Lithwick AlgonAvigail Lithwick Algon1,2William  SabanWilliam Saban1,2,3*
  • 1Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
  • 2Center for Accessible Neuropsychology, Tel Aviv, Israel, Tel aviv, Israel
  • 3Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Traditional motor and cognitive assessments for people with Parkinson's disease (PD) have long faced challenges related to accessibility, scalability, and geographical diversity when administered in-person. Remote cognitive testing offers the promise of improved accessibility, reduced participant burden, and greater scalability, particularly for individuals with mobility limitations or limited access to specialized care. While remote cognitive assessments are increasingly used in PD research and clinical settings, it remains unclear whether these measures provide an informative index of PD severity. These gaps limit the interpretability and broader adoption of remote cognitive measures as accessible and scalable indicators of PD severity. To establish a benchmark, we first analyzed a large in-person dataset (PPMI; n = 1,417). We found significant, negative, and small correlations between a cognitive measure (MoCA) scores and two motor measures (MDS-UPDRS III, ρ = -0.17; and H&Y scores, ρ = -0.12). Second, we administered remote assessments to 152 individuals with PD across 60+ geographical locations, including a videoconference-based MoCA (MoCA-VC) and online versions of the MDS-UPDRS III and H&Y. Consistent with in-person findings, we found significant, negative, and small correlations between the MoCA-VC scores and the two motor measures (MDS-UPDRS III, ρ = -0.32; and H&Y scores, ρ = -0.16). Additionally, we examined the decrease in the MoCA score as a function of disease stage. A multivariable regression model demonstrated that each one disease stage increase in H&Y was associated with a 0.65-point decrease in MoCA (in-person settings) and a 1.16-point decrease in MoCA-VC (online settings). Together, these findings demonstrate that a remote, home-based cognitive assessment captures motor–cognitive associations comparable to those observed in large in-person settings, supporting its potential utility as an accessible and scalable cognitive index of PD severity.

Keywords: CAN, Cognition, Motor evaluation, Online, parkinson's

Received: 14 Jan 2026; Accepted: 09 Feb 2026.

Copyright: © 2026 Lithwick Algon and Saban. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: William Saban

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.