REVIEW article

Front. Aging, 04 March 2026

Sec. Interventions in Aging

Volume 7 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fragi.2026.1640220

Research hotspots and trends in intrinsic capacity of older people in the context of population aging based on CiteSpace

  • 1. School of Nursing, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China

  • 2. Nursing Department, The Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China

  • 3. Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China

Abstract

Objective:

To employ bibliometrics to identify the research hotspots and development trends of the intrinsic capacity of older people, thereby providing novel insights for future studies on the management of intrinsic capacity in older adults and further facilitating the advancement of healthy aging.

Methods:

The literature on the intrinsic capacity of older people, published by China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, VIP, and SinoMed, as well as the Web of Science Core Collection, was searched from January 2015 to December 2024. The Note Express 4.1.0 software was used for literature management, and the CiteSpace 6.4. R1 software was used to visually analyze the characteristics of the number of publications, countries, institutions, authors, and keywords, and to plot the relevant graphs.

Results:

A total of 97 Chinese literature and 745 English literature were included. The number of publications on the older adults’ intrinsic capacity has shown an increasing trend both domestically and internationally. In the past 5 years, intrinsic capacity has received extensive attention, with 96.9% of Chinese papers and 79.6% of English papers published from 2020 to 2024. European researchers collaborate closely, whereas Chinese research shows weaker collaboration and strong regionalism. Keyword analysis identified 6 clusters in Chinese literature and 17 in English. Chinese hotspots mainly include influencing factors, evaluation tools, chronic disease, grip strength, frailty, and falls. Future directions focus on quality of life, social support, and the recovery period. English studies center on association, management, muscle strength, frailty, exercise, and social support, with potential future directions in supplementation and inflammation.

Conclusion:

Currently, Chinese research primarily focuses on analyzing influencing factors, with relatively few studies examining intervention measures, while English research has progressed to exploring of intervention strategies. As population aging accelerates, cross-institutional and interdisciplinary cooperation is becoming a key trend. Future research should deepen understanding, particularly for high-risk groups, and explore the effects of supplements, the predictive role of inflammatory markers, and the effectiveness of interventions for this population. These endeavors will contribute to providing precise and personalized management programs for older adults, enhance social support and quality of life, and promote the comprehensive implementation of healthy aging strategies.

1 Introduction

According to the 2022 United Nations Population Data Statistics, by 2050, the global population aged 65 and above is projected to constitute 16.4% of the total population, with China’s elderly population reaching approximately 365 million (). As the proportion of elderly individuals grows, demands on the social security system, medical services, and the care infrastructure for older people have surged significantly, imposing a heavier burden on society (). In this context, healthy aging has emerged as an inevitable trend in addressing the challenges of an aging society. In 2015, the World Health Organization (WHO) presented a new vision for healthy aging in the World Report on Aging and Health, defining it as “the process of developing and maintaining the functional ability that enables wellbeing in older age” (). This functional ability is determined by an individual’s intrinsic capabilities, relevant environmental factors, and their interactions with each other. Notably, Intrinsic Capacity (IC) refers to the composite of all physical and mental capacities of an individual (). To facilitate the application of IC in clinical settings, the WHO has identified five key domains of IC—movement, vitality, cognition, psychology, and sensation—and introduced an innovative approach, namely, Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE), which aims to enhance IC and promote healthy aging (). The decline in IC is a prevalent issue among older adults and is strongly associated with chronic conditions such as cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, and diabetes (; ; ). Research has demonstrated that more than two-thirds of community-dwelling older adults experience IC decline (), whereas older adults with stable or improved IC exhibit significantly lower mortality rates, disability incidence rates, and healthcare utilization rates (). Early detection of IC decline and timely implementation of targeted interventions are therefore critical not only for enhancing quality of life in later years but also for reducing strain on public health systems. In recent years, research on IC in aging populations has grown rapidly; however, studies exploring its determinants and effective interventions remain in the preliminary stages. Current findings lack systematic synthesis, particularly through bibliometric approaches that enable comprehensive mapping and visual analysis. Therefore, this study aims to systematically and comprehensively review the current research status in the field of IC from 2015 to 2024, and to conduct a bibliometric analysis to accurately identify developmental trends and research hotspots from a macro perspective, thereby providing practical and actionable references for future research.

2 Data and methods

2.1 Data sources

The Chinese literature was sourced from the following databases: China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, China Science and Technology Journal Database (CQVIP), and China Biomedical Literature Service System (SinoMed). In the advanced search function, the subject terms “Intrinsic Capacity of Older Adults” OR “Intrinsic Capacity in Older Adults” were used. All English-language literature was sourced from the Web of Science Core Collection Database. The search formula used was: TS = (“intrinsic capacit*” OR “physical capacit*” OR “mental capacit*” OR ICOPE OR “integrated care for older people”) AND AB = (old* OR elder* OR age* OR senior OR geriatric* OR geronto*) AND Language = English. The search period spanned from January 2015 to December 2024. The source category encompassed all journals, with a particular emphasis on academic journals. A total of 2,182 Chinese records and 1,723 English records were retrieved initially. Subsequently, the selected Chinese literature was imported into Note Express 4.1.0 software for deduplication; then, all the retrieved literature was manually screened by two researchers according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The retrieval process is shown in Figure 1. Additionally, this bibliometric study did not require ethical approval as it involved no human or animal experimentation.

FIGURE 1

2.2 Inclusion and exclusion criteria

  • Inclusion Criteria: ① Studies focusing on the intrinsic capacities of older adults. ② Literature published in Chinese or English.

  • Exclusion Criteria: ① Duplicate records. ② Non-peer-reviewed materials such as news articles, books, monographs, conference proceedings, newspapers, letters, etc. ③ Documents with incomplete or missing content.

2.3 Methods

Descriptive statistical analysis of publications was performed using Microsoft Excel 2019, covering the number of published articles, authorship, co-citations of literature, and keywords. CiteSpace V6.4. R1 was used to visualize co-citations among authors, institutions, countries, keywords, and literature, and to generate a knowledge graph (). Bibliographic records meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were exported to CiteSpace in txt format and renamed as “download_**.txt” for conversion (). The analysis time range was set from January 2015 to December 2024 with a 1-year time slice. Correlation strength was analyzed using the cosine algorithm (g-index, k = 25). Network simplification and key feature highlighting were achieved through Pathfinder, Pruning Sliced Networks, and Pruning the Merged Network. Visualization was performed using Cluster View - Static and Show Merged Network.

3 Results

Each node in the figure represents a project, with its size proportional to its occurrence frequency. Larger nodes indicate greater influence within the network. Connections between nodes denote cooperative relationships, where connection thickness reflects the strength of collaboration and color indicates the timing of the first collaboration. The presence of a purple ring around a node signifies high centrality, with wider rings indicating stronger centrality. Nodes with a centrality value of 0.1 or higher are considered key structural elements in the network, serving as critical bridges that connect different researchers or research topics and playing a significant role in facilitating the integration and innovation of domain knowledge ().

3.1 Annual publication volume

A total of 2,182 studies related to IC in older adults were retrieved from Chinese databases, while 1,732 studies were obtained from English databases. After removing duplicates and applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 97 Chinese studies and 745 English studies were ultimately selected. The overall number of published articles shows a yearly increasing trend, with the annual number of foreign-language publications generally surpassing that of Chinese publications. The distribution of the annual number of published articles is illustrated in Figure 2. Since 2020, the growth rate of annual publications in both Chinese and English has accelerated. Furthermore, the number of related articles published by Chinese researchers in English journals has also seen rapid growth. The specific number of published papers is detailed in Figure 3.

FIGURE 2

FIGURE 3

3.2 Country analysis

Based on the English literature retrieved from WOS to generate the Country co-occurrence network of IC research for older people (Figure 4). The graph comprises 71 nodes and 108 connections, illustrating the international collaborative network. The top three countries in publication count are China (123), the United States (91), and France (80), while the top three in centrality are Denmark (0.71), Lithuania (0.62), and Chile (0.42).

FIGURE 4

3.3 Institution analysis

The institutional co-occurrence map for research on older adults, based on both Chinese and English literature, is presented in Figure 5. In the Chinese literature, there are 81 nodes and 39 connections, indicating a sparse network of collaboration among institutions. The top three institutions with the highest publication counts are Beijing Hospital (9 publications), Xinjiang Medical University (6), and Bengbu Medical University (5). In contrast, the English literature contains 328 nodes and 397 connections, suggesting stronger collaborative efforts among institutions. The leading institutions in this category are CHU Toulouse (University Hospital of Toulouse, France, 24 publications), the World Health Organization (WHO, 21 publications), and the Chinese University of Hong Kong (20 publications). Notably, the WHO has the highest centrality score of 0.33.

FIGURE 5

3.4 Analysis of authors and co-cited authors

Analyzing the author collaboration network in both Chinese and English literature, Table 1 lists the top 10 most prolific authors from the past decade. For the English literature, a co-citation map of authors in the field of research on older individuals with IC has been created (Figure 6). The author with the highest co-citation frequency is the WHO, with a total of 367 citations. The top three authors based on mediating centrality are: CESARI M from France (0.14), GURALNIK JM from the United States (0.13), and DENT E from Australia (0.11). It is noteworthy that the most prolific authors consistently maintain long-standing and stable research teams.

TABLE 1

LabelChinese literatureEnglish literature
Author (affiliation)CentralityNumber of publicationsAuthor (country)CentralityNumber of publications
1Jie Zhang (Hohai University)0.029Rolland, Yves (France)017
2Li Zhang (Anhui medical University)06Vellas, Bruno (France)016
3Ji Shen (Beijing hospital)04Barreto, Philipe de Souto (France)0.0113
4Juan Wu (Beijing hospital)0.014Beard, John R (United States)0.0212
5Xin Jiang (Xinjiang medical University)04Cesari, Matteo (Italy)0.0112
6Dandan Zhang (Beijing hospital)03Gonzalez-bautista, Emmanuel (France)011
7Shuo Liu (Peking Union medical College hospital)03Karim, Asima (United Arab Emirates)011
8Fenghui Chen (Xinjiang medical University)03Chen, Liang-Kung (Taiwan, China)010
9Xuan Ma (Xinjiang medical University)03Qaisar, Rizwan (United Arab Emirates)010
10Lu Liu (Henan Provincial People’s hospital)03Ma, Lina (China)010

Top 10 authors by publication volume in Chinese and english literature.

FIGURE 6

3.5 Co-cited reference analysis

Based on the English literature, the top 10 co-cited references (; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ) related to IC is presented in Table 2. Co-cited literature forms the foundational knowledge base for this research area. The analysis reveals that these top 10 references can be categorized into four types: five focus on conceptual and theoretical research (; ; ; ; ), two examine the validity of screening tools (; ), two address the prediction of adverse outcomes (; ), and one represents a cross-sectional study (). Among these, “The structure and predictive value of intrinsic capacity in a longitudinal study of ageing” by Beard et al. ()stands out as the most influential paper, which clarified the predictive role of intrinsic capacity on elderly functional status and proposed several factors with potential research value through long-term follow-up of 2,560 elderly people in England, providing theoretical basis and direction reference for subsequent research.

TABLE 2

LabelAuthorYearsCo-cited referenceCount
1John R Beard2019The structure and predictive value of intrinsic capacity in a longitudinal study of ageing123
2Matteo Cesari2018Evidence for the domains Supporting the Construct of intrinsic capacity110
3John R Beard2022Intrinsic capacity: Validation of a new WHO concept for healthy aging in a longitudinal Chinese study69
4Giulia Belloni2019Frailty and intrinsic capacity: Two distinct but related constructs62
5Alexia Charles2020Prediction of adverse outcomes in nursing Home Residents according to intrinsic capacity proposed by the world health organization56
6Lina Ma2020Integrated care for older people screening tool for measuring intrinsic capacity: Preliminary findings from ICOPE Pilot in China56
7WHO2019Integrated care for older people (icope): guidance for person- centred assessment and pathways in primary care52
8Lina Ma2021Cross-sectional study examining the status of intrinsic capacity decline in community-dwelling older adults in China: Prevalence, associated factors and implications for clinical care50
9Erwin Stolz2022Intrinsic capacity predicts negative health outcomes in older adults49
10Emmanuel González-Bautista2021Screening for intrinsic capacity impairments as markers of increased risk of frailty and disability in the context of integrated care for older people: Secondary analysis of MAPT45

Top 10 Co-cited references in english literature.

3.6 Keywords analysis

3.6.1 Co-occurrence analysis

Based on the Chinese and English literature, a co-occurrence network of keywords in the field of IC was created (Figure 7). In the Chinese literature, six high-frequency keywords (occurring five times or more) were identified. The top three keywords, evaluated by centrality, were “intrinsic capacity (1.17),” “older adults (0.70),” and “healthy aging (0.04)” This analysis concluded that the main research areas in the domestic field of IC for older adults focus on healthy aging, encompassing key aspects such as influencing factors, quality of life, and social support. In contrast, the English literature revealed 139 high-frequency keywords. The top three keywords, according to centrality, were “interventions” (0.41), “activities of daily living” (0.36), and “associations” (0.19).”Other keywords such as “older people,” “health,” “disability,” “frailty,” and “exercise” showed strong co-occurrence and high frequency, suggesting that various research hotspots are closely interconnected. The top 10 high-frequency keywords in both Chinese and English are presented in Table 3.

FIGURE 7

TABLE 3

LabelChinese literatureEnglish literature
CountCentralityKeywordsCountCentralityKeywords
1921.17Intrinsic capacity2040.1Older adults
2740.70Older adults2020.01Intrinsic capacity
3190.04Healthy aging1560.09Health
4130.01Influencing factors1080.05Disability
570.03Quality of life1020.03Frailty
650.00Social support960.07People
750.00Evaluation tools940.18Physical activity
840.00Rural area870.08Performance
940.00Trajectory of change860.04Adults
1030.03Risk factor850.01Mortality

Top 10 high-frequency keywords in english and Chinese literature.

3.6.2 Cluster analysis

Based on the keyword co-occurrence network, we conducted a cluster analysis using the log-likelihood ratio (LLR) algorithm. The keyword cluster map is displayed in Figure 8, where the size of each cluster is inversely proportional to its sequence number.

FIGURE 8

The clustering results of Chinese literature revealed 6 cluster labels, with a modularity Q = 0.3533 (>0.3) and an average silhouette S = 0.7261 (>0.7), indicating a highly reasonable clustering outcome. The three largest clusters by scale are: “#0 Health aging”, “#1 Unfavorable health outcome”, and “#2 Social support”. The clustering results of the English literature indicate that the formation of 17 cluster labels, with a modularity Q = 0.7244(>0.3) and an average silhouette S = 0.8745(>0.7), signifying a relatively robust clustering effect. The three largest clusters by scale are: “#0 Older People”, “#1 Cardiorespiratory fitness”, and “#2 Physical capacity”.

3.6.3 Timeline analysis

In comparison to English keywords, Chinese keywords emerged later and showed weaker continuity. Research on IC for the older adults in China began relatively recently and did not reach its peak until 2020. Foreign keywords such as “older adults,” “physical capacity,” and “functional ability” have demonstrated temporal continuity from 2015 to 2024, highlighting these area as primary focuses of IC research for older individuals. The timeline map of key words is presented in Figure 9.

FIGURE 9

3.6.4 Burst analysis

Based on the analysis of keyword clustering for burst terms, the top 25 keywords with the strongest citation are illustrated in Figure 10. In this graph, the horizontal axis represents the timeline. The light blue line indicates that a keyword has not yet emerged, the dark blue line marks the beginning of its burst, and the red line highlights the period of peak burst intensity. Among the burst terms in Chinese literature, the top three keywords with the highest burst intensity are “social support” (1.09), “current research status” (0.69), and “chronic disease” (0.68).

FIGURE 10

Furthermore, the number of burst terms from 2020 to 2024 is significantly higher than those from 2015 to 2019. In English literature, the top three keywords with the greatest burst intensity are “muscle strength” (4.76), “body composition” (4.33), and “physical capacity” (4.08).

4 Discussion

4.1 Basic information

Research on IC for older adults has seen a consistent year-on-year increase, both domestically and internationally. Studies conducted abroad began earlier than those in China. From the initial introduction of the concept in 2015 until 2018, China published fewer than one paper on average per year. However, following the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2019, which severely threatened human safety and health (), significant challenges arose for implementing healthy aging initiatives. This situation sparked increased interest in researching IC for older adults, drawing considerable attention from scholars worldwide. As a result, the number of published papers has rapidly increased. Notably, among English literature, Chinese scholars lead in the number of published papers and show a relatively fast growth rate, contributing to approximately 16.5% of the total publications, which indicates that China places significant emphasis on addressing the challenges posed by an aging society and maintains sustained strategic support in this domain as a populous nation.

National co-occurrence analysis indicates that China ranks first in English research on older people IC, followed by the United States and France. European countries, such as Denmark, Lithuania, Chile, and Austria, exhibit strong cooperation with one another, while China primarily collaborates with Australia and Japan (; ). Further co-occurrence analysis of institutions and authors reveals that domestic research teams predominantly engage in cooperation within their own regions rather than seeking cross-regional partnerships. The core group of authors involved in older people’s IC research is mainly concentrated in Beijing, where significant research advancements have been made (), partly due to the establishment of the National Geriatric Medical Center at Beijing Hospital in 2018. In English research, the WHO plays a central role. Among the top ten institutions ranked by publication volume, China accounts for 30% of the total. In contrast, France, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, Sweden, and Milan collectively represent 70%. This indicates that China has an advantage in this field. Therefore, it is recommended that domestic scholars actively enhance collaborations across regions, disciplines, and interdisciplinary teams to promote more in-depth research on older individuals’ issues, facilitating earlier identification and effective interventions.

4.2 Research hotspot

4.2.1 Common research hotspots

Through a comprehensive analysis of high-frequency keywords, keywords with high centrality, and cluster results, the investigation of association factors has been identified as a common research focus in both Chinese and English literature. However, there are differences in specific methods between Chinese and English research: Chinese literature often uses current situation survey methods to analyze the influencing factors of specific population IC, while English literature focuses on exploring the correlation between a certain indicator and IC through correlation studies. Current research suggests that older adults’ IC arises from a combination of demographic factors, personal traits, behavioral patterns, and environmental conditions (

). Recent studies have particularly emphasized several key areas, including muscle strength, chronic disease, frailty, and falls.

  • The relationship between muscle strength and IC has emerged as a prominent research focus in both domestic and international academic communities. Chinese scholars conducted a survey and analysis of 5,520 elderly individuals using data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), which indicates that grip strength is not only a direct measure of muscle strength, but also a predictive indicator of multiple dimensions of IC in older adults beyond cognition (). However, a large-scale meta-analysis incorporating 77 studies demonstrated a significant association between grip strength and cognitive function in older adults (). Therefore, future research needs to further explore and clarify the underlying reasons for these differences.

  • The chronic diseases, such as hypertension, diabetes, depression, and dementia, are closely linked to IC in older adults. A cohort study with a 3.3-year follow-up demonstrated that, among IC domains, only vitality impairment was significantly associated with an increased risk of T2DM (). A study divided 206 older adults with hypertension into a group with decreased IC and a group without such a decline, and conducted 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. The results revealed a significant association between decreased IC and 24-h systolic blood pressure variability in elderly hypertensive patients (). Two studies analyzed data from 426,714 to 366,406 participants registered in the United Kingdom Biobank, respectively, and found that higher intrinsic capacity impairment scores were significantly associated with an increased risk of both depression and dementia (; ). Therefore, the relationship between different diseases and IC warrants further in-depth investigation. Some diseases affect only a specific dimension of intrinsic capacity, and the current body of related research remains limited, which hinders its application in clinical practice and scientific inquiry. Future studies should strengthen research on the associations between various diseases and the intrinsic capacity to clarify underlying mechanisms and inform the development of targeted intervention strategies.

  • Frailty is closely linked to IC. A decline in IC can precede the clinical manifestations of frailty, which increases the risk of negative outcomes such as frailty, falls, and the inappropriate use of medication (; ; ; ). A study involving 665 elderly patients with gastrointestinal cancers found that impaired IC was associated with both frailty and a decreased overall survival rate in these patients (). However, further research is needed to elucidate the complex relationship between these two concepts.

  • Falls interact with IC. Studies have demonstrated that experiencing falls in the past year is a significant factor influencing IC in older adults (), and a decline in IC among older individuals can further heighten their risk of falling (). Therefore, healthcare professionals should pay closer attention to elderly patients with reduced IC and a higher risk of falls, implementing targeted interventions to prevent the harmful cycle of decreased IC and increased fall risk.

4.2.2 Distinct research hotspots

4.2.2.1 Chinese research hotspots

Chinese literature tends to focus more on evaluation tools in IC research. This is reflected in high-frequency keywords such as “screening tools,” “evaluation tools,“.

High-quality screening and assessment tools are the foundation for researching IC. Currently, there is no unified measurement standard across different dimensions, and there is a lack of IC assessment tools and comprehensive scoring thresholds that align with various country conditions, medical environments, and older people’s care systems (). Previous studies have predominantly relied on the calculation model of composite scores derived from various assessment tools. The ICOPE tool, proposed by the WHO in 2019 (), was translated into Chinese by Li Xiaxia et al., in 2024 (). This tool facilitates a stepwise process of screening, assessment, plan formulation, implementation, and tracking to maintain the IC of the older people (). However, its sensitivity and specificity are limited, making it challenging to conduct precise assessments in certain real-world scenarios (). Yan Zhili et al. developed a reliable and valid assessment scale for IC in older adults, focusing on five key dimensions (). After testing, this scale proved effective for evaluating the IC levels of older individuals. However, further large-scale and multi-center validation is necessary to improve its generalizability. Recently, researchers have created an innovative support platform aimed at promoting healthy aging in older adults through IC monitoring (). This platform not only stores health measurement data and offers personalized recommendations but also predicts potential changes in IC over the coming years. It has been successfully implemented in Austria, Italy, and Romania. Therefore, future research should concentrate on developing and validating screening and assessment tools for IC in older adults, aiming for straightforward and accurate identification of IC levels.

4.2.2.2 English research hotspots

English literature primarily focuses on intervention measures in IC research. This is reflected in high-frequency keywords such as “management,” “exercise,” and “social support” as well as high centrality keywords like “interventions” and “activities of daily living” along with cluster analysis results.

Effective intervention measures are essential for alleviating or preventing the decline of IC in older adults. Currently, research on intervention strategies for enhancing IC in this population remains limited, and the formulation of intervention plans requires further refinement. Guo et al. conducted a latent class analysis of elderly individuals in community health service centers, categorizing their IC into three subgroups. They suggested that targeted intervention measures should be implemented for each subgroup to enhance IC effectively (

).

  • At present, most intervention programs for older adults’ IC primarily focus on exercise-based interventions. Regular exercise leads to various physiological adaptations and contributes to the improvement and maintenance of vitality and functional status (). A 3-month randomized controlled trial involving 188 elderly individuals demonstrated that a 12-week multi-component exercise program is an effective strategy for enhancing IC, specifically in terms of locomotion, cognition, and vitality capacity among the older adults (). A meta-analysis shows that Tai Chi, as a low-cost and low-risk intervention, can significantly enhance IC in older adults, particularly in the domains of cognition, locomotion, and psychological, with consistent effects observed across varying intervention durations and implementation settings (). It can be seen that different exercise forms have distinct effects on various dimensions of IC, and further research in this area should be prioritized in the future.

  • Another key intervention is social support, which enhances psychological resilience, promotes cognitive and functional capacity, and delays functional decline through the provision of emotional support, practical assistance, and informational guidance. A cross-sectional survey of 1,181 older adults in communities showed that subjective support can mitigate the association between lower IC and poorer mental health–related quality of life (). However, a longitudinal study exploring the interaction of IC, social participation, and family support on the trajectory of activities of daily living (ADL) in older adults found that life care helps maintain functional abilities in individuals with intact IC, but may accelerate functional decline in those with low IC. Therefore, future research should further investigate the mechanisms through which social support influences the IC to identify appropriate intervention approaches and optimal levels.

4.3 Research trends

4.3.1 Chinese research trends

Based on the burst terms identified in Chinese literature, the social support, quality of life, evaluation tools, recovery period, and type 2 diabetes may represent potential areas for future research development on IC in older adults. Since the evaluation tools, social support, and type 2 diabetes have been mentioned, this section will only elaborate on the recovery period and quality of life.

The quality of life is a critical indicator for evaluating healthy aging. Enhancing the quality of life is a prerequisite for achieving the goal of a “secure and enjoyable old age.” Research has demonstrated that impaired IC not only significantly impacts the quality of life for older adults but also negatively affects their perception and use of social support (; ). A comprehensive social support system can provide older individuals with positive emotional experiences, which can strengthen their sense of belonging and wellbeing. Therefore, future research in China may focus on the development of a social support system to enhance the quality of life among older adults.

Elderly patients during the rehabilitation period frequently experience delayed recovery of physical and immune functions, are prone to psychological anxiety, and often have comorbid chronic diseases. Furthermore, those with impaired IC face a significantly higher risk of delayed or inadequate postoperative recovery, necessitating a longer and more intensive rehabilitation process. Currently, research on disease recovery and IC remains relatively limited, with only a few studies focusing on stroke and postoperative patient populations. Among older adults recovering from stroke, IC is generally low and positively correlated with self-efficacy (). A longitudinal study demonstrated that, among elderly cancer patients, frailty is a stronger predictor of postoperative functional recovery and quality of life than IC (). However, evidence also indicates that older adults with diminished IC are more likely to develop frailty. Therefore, researchers should investigate the underlying mechanisms linking frailty and IC and clarify their predictive value for functional outcomes during the recovery period.

4.3.2 English research trends

The burst analysis results of English literature indicate that supplements and inflammation are likely to become key research directions in the future.

It remains unclear whether nutritional supplements can help maintain the balance of energy and nutrition in older individuals, thereby improving their IC. To date, no relevant studies have been identified in China. A RCT carried out by French researchers among community-dwelling elderly participants, who received either ω-3 supplements or a placebo as part of a multi-domain intervention, demonstrated no statistically significant difference in IC between the control group and the experimental group (). Therefore, further in-depth experiments and discussion are still needed in this field.

Identifying inflammatory markers that are closely associated with IC is essential for developing strategies to prevent or slow age-related functional decline and dependence on care. A study investigated the relationship between blood biomarkers related to inflammation and neurodegeneration and IC. The findings indicated that interleukin-6 is associated with a rapid decline in IC in men (). Additionally, a 5-year follow-up multi-domain intervention study revealed that both low-grade inflammation and elevated homocysteine levels were associated with impaired overall IC levels in older individuals ().

In conclusion, future research on IC in older adults should prioritize enhancing social support and quality of life, especially for those with various chronic diseases. It is crucial to elucidate further the correlation between different supplements and IC in this age group, as well as the predictive role of inflammatory markers on IC, to maximize the potential for primary prevention of IC.

5 Conclusion

With the continuous acceleration of population aging, elderly healthcare has become a core issue in achieving healthy aging. A growing number of scholars are now focusing on research into IC in older people, particularly in European countries where the aging issue emerged earlier. China, being a highly populated country, is also facing a serious aging problem. In recent years, there has been significant progress in research related to IC in older people, with a notable increase in the number of published papers on this topic. Currently, research on IC in older adults is focusing on several key areas, which include the development of assessment and screening tools, the identification of influencing factors, and the exploration of effective intervention strategies. In the future, research in this field will place greater emphasis on enhancing social support and quality of life for older adults, improving functional capacity in patients during the recovery period of chronic diseases, evaluating the effectiveness of various supplements, and investigating the predictive role of inflammatory markers on IC. Efforts will also aim to strengthen early detection of signals indicating declines in IC among elderly individuals, along with actively implementing intervention measures to promote healthy aging.

6 Strengths and limitations

Our study utilizes the visualization analysis software CiteSpace to perform an in-depth analysis of relevant literature over the 10 years since the concept of Intrinsic Capacity was proposed. This approach enables us to precisely identify research trends and hotspots from a macro perspective, thereby providing practical and actionable references for future research endeavors. However, it is crucial to recognize the limitations of this study. First, the literature search was confined to English and Chinese sources, which might introduce publication bias. Second, the analysis of English literature relied exclusively on the WOS database, possibly resulting in deviations in the research findings. Additionally, recent high-quality articles may not have garnered adequate attention owing to their short publication time frame and low citation frequency, requiring a need for updates in future research.

Statements

Author contributions

MR: Data curation, Methodology, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. HG: Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review and editing. YT: Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. YG: Data curation, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – review and editing. WG: Investigation, Writing – review and editing. LZ: Writing – review and editing.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fragi.2026.1640220/full#supplementary-material

References

  • 1

    AminiN.Ibn HachM.LapauwL.DupontJ.VercauterenL.VerschuerenS.et al (2024). Meta-analysis on the interrelationship between sarcopenia and mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer’s disease and other forms of dementia. J. Cachexia, Sarcopenia Muscle15 (4), 1240–1253. 10.1002/jcsm.13485

  • 2

    BeardJ. R.JotheeswaranA. T.CesariM.Araujo de CarvalhoI. (2019). The structure and predictive value of intrinsic capacity in a longitudinal study of ageing. BMJ Open9 (11), e026119. 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026119

  • 3

    BeardJ. R.SiY.LiuZ.ChenowethL.HanewaldK. (2022). Intrinsic capacity: validation of a new WHO concept for healthy aging in a longitudinal Chinese study. Journals Gerontology77 (1), 94–100. 10.1093/gerona/glab226

  • 4

    BelloniG.CesariM. (2019). Frailty and intrinsic capacity: two distinct but related constructs. Front. Med.6, 133. 10.3389/fmed.2019.00133

  • 5

    CaoX.YiX.ChenH.TianY.LiS.ZhouJ. (2024). Prevalence of intrinsic capacity decline among community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging Clin. Exp. Res.36 (1), 157. 10.1007/s40520-024-02816-5

  • 6

    CesariM.Araujo de CarvalhoI.Amuthavalli ThiyagarajanJ.CooperC.MartinF. C.ReginsterJ. Y.et al (2018). Evidence for the domains supporting the construct of intrinsic capacity. Journals Gerontology73 (12), 1653–1660. 10.1093/gerona/gly011

  • 7

    CesariM.SumiY.HanZ. A.PerraciniM.JangH.BriggsA.et al (2022). Implementing care for healthy ageing. BMJ Glob. Health7 (2), e007778. 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007778

  • 8

    CharlesA.BuckinxF.LocquetM.ReginsterJ. Y.PetermansJ.GruslinB.et al (2020). Prediction of adverse outcomes in nursing home residents according to intrinsic capacity proposed by the world health organization. Journals Gerontology75 (8), 1594–1599. 10.1093/gerona/glz218

  • 9

    ChenC. (2006). CiteSpace II: detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol.57 (3), 359–377. 10.1002/asi.20317

  • 10

    ChenY.ChenC.LiuZ. (2015). The methodology function of CiteSpace mapping knowledge domains. Stud. Sci. Sci.30 (2), 242–253. 10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.2015.02.009

  • 11

    de Assunção Cortez CorrêaL. C.RaffinJ.VellasB.GuerraR. O.de Souto BarretoP. (2025). Sex-specific associations of neurodegeneration and inflammatory biomarkers with intrinsic capacity in older adults: findings from the 4-year longitudinal multidomain Alzheimer’s prevention trial (MAPT). Maturitas193, 108191. 10.1016/j.maturitas.2024.108191

  • 12

    GaoW. X.LiuJ.WangJ.JinY. L.YeungS. L. A.LamT. H.et al (2025). Association of intrinsic capacity with incident type 2 diabetes mellitus in older Chinese: guangzhou biobank cohort study. Archives Gerontology Geriatrics129, 105687. 10.1016/j.archger.2024.105687

  • 13

    GiudiciK. V.de Souto BarretoP.GuervilleF.BeardJ.Araujo de CarvalhoI.AndrieuS.et al (2019). Associations of C-reactive protein and homocysteine concentrations with the impairment of intrinsic capacity domains over a 5-year follow-up among community-dwelling older adults at risk of cognitive decline (MAPT study). Exp. Gerontol.127, 110716. 10.1016/j.exger.2019.110716

  • 14

    GiudiciK. V.de Souto BarretoP.BeardJ.CantetC.Araujo de CarvalhoI.RollandY.et al (2020). Effect of long-term omega-3 supplementation and a lifestyle multidomain intervention on intrinsic capacity among community-dwelling older adults: secondary analysis of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial (MAPT study). Maturitas141, 39–45. 10.1016/j.maturitas.2020.06.012

  • 15

    González-BautistaE.de Souto BarretoP.AndrieuS.RollandY.VellasB.MAPT/DSA group members are listed under ‘Contributors’ (2021). Screening for intrinsic capacity impairments as markers of increased risk of frailty and disability in the context of integrated care for older people: secondary analysis of MAPT. Maturitas150, 1–6. 10.1016/j.maturitas.2021.05.011

  • 16

    GuoW.MengL.HanJ.YangB.SunJ.GuoY.et al (2024). Intrinsic capacity and its association with predictors among Chinese empty nest older adults in communities: a latent class analysis. BMC Geriatr.24 (1), 1008. 10.1186/s12877-024-05583-0

  • 17

    HuF. W.SunC. Y.SuW. C.ChangC. M. (2025). Frailty and intrinsic capacity as predictors of recovery in older patients surgically treated for cancer: a longitudinal study. Cancer Nurs.10.1097/NCC.0000000000001497

  • 18

    HuangC. H.OkadaK.MatsushitaE.UnoC.SatakeS.MartinsB. A.et al (2021). Dietary patterns and intrinsic capacity among community-dwelling older adults: a 3-year prospective cohort study. Eur. J. Nutr.60 (6), 3303–3313. 10.1007/s00394-021-02505-3

  • 19

    HuangB.LuoT.JiangX. (2022). Correlation between decline in intrinsic capacity and blood pressure variability in elderly patients with hypertension. Chin. J. Geriatric Heart Brain Vessel Dis.24 (7), 709–712. 10.3969/j.issn.1009-0126.2022.07.010

  • 20

    HwangA. C.ChenL. Y.TsengS. H.HuangC. Y.YenK. H.ChenL. K.et al (2024). Intrinsic capacity transitions predict overall and cause-specific mortality, incident disability, and healthcare utilization. J. Nutr. Health & Aging28 (10), 100359. 10.1016/j.jnha.2024.100359

  • 21

    JiangX.MaX.ChenF. (2023). Correlation between intrinsic capacity and quality of life in 1042 community elderly people in urumqi. J. Xinjiang Med. Univ.46 (4), 561–566. 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5551.2023.04.023

  • 22

    JonesR.TaylorT. L.MankowskiR. T.DoddsF.HankesM.HobsonJ.et al (2024). Exercise training to preserve vitality capacity in ageing. Exp. Physiol.10.1113/EP091731

  • 23

    KangY.ShiH.ZhangJ.MengX.ZhangC.ShenJ.et al (2024). The bidirectional relationship between intrinsic capacity and catastrophic health expenditure in China: a longitudinal study. Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.80 (3), glae301. 10.1093/gerona/glae301

  • 24

    KeK.WangM.WangJ. (2024). Research advances in influencing factors and enhancement strategies for older adults' intrinsic capacity. Mod. Nurse31 (7), 6–10. 10.19792/j.cnki.1006-6411.2024.20.002

  • 25

    KolakowskiM.LupicaA.BenB. S.Djaja-JoskoV.KolakowskiJ.CichockiJ.et al (2025). CAREUP: an integrated care platform with intrinsic capacity monitoring and prediction capabilities. Sensors25 (3), 916. 10.3390/s25030916

  • 26

    LanY.SalvadorJ. T.ZhangS.WuM. (2025). The impact of community-based Tai chi exercise on intrinsic capacity improvement in the elderly: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Postgrad. Med. J., qgaf171. 10.1093/postmj/qgaf171

  • 27

    LiJ.HuangF.ZhouJ. (2022). Analysis of the correlation between the internal ability and self-efficacy of the elderly patients with stroke in the recovery period. J. Bingtuan Med.20 (3), 62–65. 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4356.2022.03.031

  • 28

    LiX.ChhetriJ. K.ChenY. (2024). Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of WHO integrated care for older people screening tool. Chin. J. Clin. Healthc.27 (5), 621–625. 10.3969/J.issn.1672-6790.2024.05.011

  • 29

    MaL.ChhetriJ. K.ZhangY.LiuP.ChenY.LiY.et al (2020). Integrated care for older people screening tool for measuring intrinsic capacity: preliminary findings from ICOPE pilot in China. Front. Med.7, 576079. 10.3389/fmed.2020.576079

  • 30

    MaL.ChhetriJ. K.ZhangL.SunF.LiY.TangZ. (2021). Cross-sectional study examining the status of intrinsic capacity decline in community-dwelling older adults in China: prevalence, associated factors and implications for clinical care. BMJ Open11 (1), e043062. 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043062

  • 31

    MaL.ZhengE.FangY.ChenH.ZhouC.CaiS.et al (2024). Sensitivity and specificity of three measures of intrinsic capacity in older people aged 80 and over in nursing homes. Clin. Interventions Aging19, 2179–2194. 10.2147/CIA.S486663

  • 32

    MaheshwariS.DaiC.GiriS.HarmonC.TuckerA.FowlerM. E.et al (2024). Intrinsic capacity and survival among older adults with gastrointestinal malignancies: the cancer and aging resilience evaluation registry. Cancer130 (20), 3530–3539. 10.1002/cncr.35427

  • 33

    PanF. (2020). The elderly are the key prevention population of covid-19 -- an interview with professor zhongnanshan, academician of the Chinese academy of engineering and head of the high-level expert group of the national health Commission. China Med. Her.17 (06), 1–3. 10.20047/j.issn1673-7210.2020.06.001

  • 34

    Ramírez-VélezR.Iriarte-FernándezM.SantaféG.MalandaA.BeardJ. R.Garcia-HermosoA.et al (2023). Association of intrinsic capacity with incidence and mortality of cardiovascular disease: prospective study in UK biobank. J. Cachexia, Sarcopenia Muscle14 (5), 2054–2063. 10.1002/jcsm.13283

  • 35

    Ramírez-VélezR.BordaM. G.Sáez de AsteasuM. L.IzquierdoM. (2025). Intrinsic capacity as a predictor of depression onset in middle-aged and older adults: insights from the UK biobank. J. Affect. Disord.388, 119590. 10.1016/j.jad.2025.119590

  • 36

    Sánchez-SánchezJ. L.de Souto BarretoP.Antón-RodrigoI.Ramón-EspinozaF.Marín-EpeldeI.Sánchez-LatorreM.et al (2022). Effects of a 12-week vivifrail exercise program on intrinsic capacity among frail cognitively impaired community-dwelling older adults: secondary analysis of a multicentre randomised clinical trial. Age Ageing51 (12), afac303. 10.1093/ageing/afac303

  • 37

    ShiX.OuyangX.ShenL. (2023). Relationship between decline of intrinsic capacity and frailty in elderly inpatients. Pract. Geriatr.37 (3), 256–260. 10.3969/j.issn.1003-9198.2023.03.011

  • 38

    SiY.HanewaldK.ChenS.LiB.BatemanH.BeardJ. R. (2023). Life-course inequalities in intrinsic capacity and healthy ageing, China. Bull. World Health Organ.101 (5), 307–316C. 10.2471/BLT.22.288888

  • 39

    SongN.ZhouJ.ZhangL. (2024). Association between intrinsic capacity and falls among older adults. China Prev. Med. J.36 (1), 1–4. 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2024.01.001

  • 40

    StolzE.MayerlH.FreidlW.Roller-WirnsbergerR.GillT. M. (2022). Intrinsic capacity predicts negative health outcomes in older adults. Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.77 (1), 101–105. 10.1093/gerona/glab279

  • 41

    SunM.HeQ.SunN.HanQ.WangY.ZhaoH.et al (2024). Intrinsic capacity, polygenic risk score, APOE genotype, and risk of dementia: a prospective cohort study based on the UK biobank. Neurology102 (12), e209452. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209452

  • 42

    TakedaC.GuyonnetS.SumiY.VellasB.Araujo de CarvalhoI. (2020). Integrated care for older people and the implementation in the INSPIRE care cohort. J. Prev. Alzheimer’s Dis.7 (2), 70–74. 10.14283/jpad.2020.8

  • 43

    UN (2022). World population prospects 2022. New York: United Nations.

  • 44

    WHO (2025). Integrated care for older people (ICOPE): guidance for person-centred assessment and pathways in primary care.

  • 45

    World Health Organization (2015). World report on ageing and health. Geneva: World Health Organization.

  • 46

    World Health Organization (2017). WHO clinical consortium on healthy ageing topic focus: frailty and intrinsic capacity report of consortium meeting 1–2 December 2016. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.

  • 47

    YanZ.YangZ.ZhaoH. (2024). Development and reliability and validity test of the intrinsic capacity assessment scale for the older people. Chin. J. Nurs.59 (15), 1852–1859. 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2024.15.009

  • 48

    YouL.XuW.QiJ. (2023). Correlation analysis between falls in hospitalized elderly patients and their intrinsic capacity. J. Qilu Nurs.29 (1), 112–115. 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2023.01.035

  • 49

    YuL.ZhangP.MiaoM. (2018). A specific tertiary hospital undertakes relevant projects within the field of geriatric medicine research. Chin. J. Gerontology38 (20), 5089–5092. 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2018.20.085

  • 50

    YuJ.JinY.SiH.BianY.LiuQ. (2023). Relationship between intrinsic capacity and health-related quality of life among community-dwelling older adults: the moderating role of social support. Qual. Life Res.33 (1), 267–280. 10.1007/s11136-023-03520-z

  • 51

    YueX.WangM.LiW. (2024). Comparison of scoping review on intrinsic capacity assessment and outcome indicators in the elderly. Chin. Nurs. Res.38 (1), 122–129. 10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2024.01.020

  • 52

    ZhangY.WangJ.ShenH. (2024). Correlation between potentially inappropriate medication and decline of intrinsic capacity in elderly inpatients. Chin. J. Multiple Organ Dis. Elder.23 (7), 514–518. 10.11915/j.issn.1671-5403.2024.07.11

  • 53

    ZhangL.YuW.RenY. (2024). Current status of intrinsic capacity of the elderly in medical-nursing combined institutions and its influencing factors. Anhui Med. J.45 (9), 1165–1171. 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399.2024.09.019

  • 54

    ZhaoY.ZhangL.WuG. (2023). Influence of intrinsic capacity decline on quality of life of the community elderly. Pract. Geriatr.37 (10), 1014–1018. 10.3969/j.issn.1003-9198.2023.10.009

  • 55

    ZhaoS.LiuM.ChangY. (2024). Cut-off value of grip strength and the relationship with intrinsic capability in Chinese elderly. Pract. Geriatr.39 (3), 298–302. 10.3969/j.issn.1003-9198.2025.03.019

  • 56

    ZhaoJ.JiX.HuangY. (2024). New advances in frailty and intrinsic capacity under healthy ageing framework. Chin. J. Multiple Organ Dis. Elder.23 (11), 872–876. 10.11915/j.issn.1671-5403.2024.11.192

  • 57

    ZhengG.OuF.ChenS.JiC.ChangQ.WangD.et al (2025). Associations of intrinsic capacity deficit proxy score and genetic susceptibility with incident chronic kidney disease and life expectancy. Journals Gerontology80 (11), glaf187. 10.1093/gerona/glaf187

Summary

Keywords

bibliometrics, intrinsic capacity, older people, research hotspot, research trend, visual analysis

Citation

Ren M, Guo H, Tian Y, Guo Y, Guo W and Zhu L (2026) Research hotspots and trends in intrinsic capacity of older people in the context of population aging based on CiteSpace. Front. Aging 7:1640220. doi: 10.3389/fragi.2026.1640220

Received

03 June 2025

Revised

14 December 2025

Accepted

17 February 2026

Published

04 March 2026

Volume

7 - 2026

Edited by

Mohammad Tahir Siddiqui, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, India

Reviewed by

Michael P Okoh, Sichuan University, China

Sri Ratna Rahayu, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Hongtao Guo,

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics