ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Agron.
Sec. Plant-Soil Interactions
Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fagro.2025.1471052
This article is part of the Research TopicInnovative Approaches in Nutrient Management for Sustainable Cropping SystemsView all 6 articles
Household and farm-level drivers of the use and intensity of soil fertility amendments in smallholder farming systems: a case of Masvingo District, Zimbabwe, and Mopani District, South Africa
Provisionally accepted
- 1University of Uélé, Isiro, Orientale, Democratic Republic of Congo
- 2University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
- 3University of Venda, Thohoyandou, South Africa
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Smallholder farming systems critically secure livelihoods and significantly contribute towards household food security in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Sustainable soil fertility management is, however, essential for improving crop and livestock productivity and resilience in smallholder farming systems. Using the integrated soil fertility management (ISFM) approach, an investigation into the intricate relationship between socio-economic and farm-level factors and agricultural practices on the use and intensity of use of quantities of organic soil amendments (OSA) and inorganic soil amendments (ISA) among smallholder farmers in Masvingo, Zimbabwe and Mopani, South Africa, which remains poorly understood among rural farming communities, revealed complex relationships among these factors and issues. The ISFM approach employing binary and ordered logistic regression models on household survey data (n=378) found that the farmer's location (i.e. district), years of formal education, literacy, household labour, income sources and monthly income, total landholding, main crop grown, livestock ownership, soil type and soil testing significantly affected fertilizer adoption and fertilizer application intensity. Farmers in Masvingo, Zimbabwe, were more inclined to use and apply higher quantities of OSA and ISA than those in Mopani, South Africa, highlighting the role of regional agroecological and socio-economic differences. Cattle ownership significantly increased OSA use while negatively influencing ISA use, reinforcing the importance of crop-livestock integration. Additionally, soil testing encouraged ISA application but discouraged OSA use, suggesting that farmers perceived ISA as a more immediate response to soil fertility deficiencies. The contrasting influence of some socio-economic factors indicates the intricate nature of smallholder farming systems and how household characteristics are intertwined with ISFM decisions. Therefore, there is a need for context-specific farmer education programs, tailored soil testing programs, financial support for fertilizer access, and location-specific extension services to address the unique differences among smallholder farmers in rural areas to enhance soil fertility, improve crop and livestock productivity, and increase overall resilience in smallholder farming systems.
Keywords: Organic soil amendments, inorganic soil amendments, Small-scale farming, Soil fertility amendments, Southern Africa, sub-Saharan Africa, sustainable agriculture
Received: 26 Jul 2024; Accepted: 26 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Bombit, Taurayi, Mugari and Tatsvarei. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Ephias Mugari, University of Venda, Thohoyandou, South Africa
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.