ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Agron.
Sec. Climate-Smart Agronomy
Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fagro.2025.1562623
This article is part of the Research TopicClimate-Smart Agriculture: Enhancing Sustainable Crop Production in Arid and Semi-arid Environments through Conservation of Natural ResourcesView all 3 articles
Unlocking winter maize potential: pioneering on-farm strategies for resilient yields in challenging climates
Provisionally accepted- 1CIMMYT-Borlaug Institute for South Asia (BISA),, Samastipur, Bihar, India
- 2Indian Agricultural Research Institute (ICAR), New Delhi, India
- 3Bihar Agricultural University (BAU), Bhagalpur, Bihar, India
- 4Borlaug Institute for South Asia (BISA), Ludhiana, Punjab, India
- 5Sugarcane Research Institute, Department of Agronomy, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Samastipur, Bihar, India
- 6ICAR-Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patana, Bihar, India
- 7Department of Agriculture, Government of Bihar (GoB), Patna, India
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
What are the key factors influencing yield in winter maize cultivation under adverse climatic conditions? How can on-farm experimentation reveal innovative strategies to improve production in these challenging environments? Four year (2020-21-to-2023-24) on farm experimentation at 160 farmers in the districts of Purnia and Katihar were consider for study. The key factors evaluated for maize yields encompassed sowing windows, varietal performance, topography, seed treatment, earthing up, planting methods, spacing, tillage practices, irrigation, and nutrient management. Data was collected using a structured questionnaire that was validated by visiting on-farm experimentation at fields. Results indicated that the optimal sowing window for high yields was October 25 th to November 7 th , with high-yielding varieties Grover 4455 and Srikar 1818 showing the best performance. Topography showed a preferential distribution of yield towards upland areas. Higher frequencies of high yields in seed-treated plots were nevertheless obtained, with 62% high yields obtained in treated plots against 48% obtained in plots without treatment.At earthing up is one of the critical practices in flat bed system (FBS), and it contributed much to higher yields (χ²=17.86, p=0.003), but in raised bed system (RBS), which allow superior yields intrinsically. This trial showed that optimum spacing of 50 cm row-to-row and 22 cm plant-to-plant, coupled with moderate tillage operations of 4-10, with a median of 6, resulted in increased yields. Efficient irrigation management, where high-yielding plots received balanced nutrient applications of 243.85-165.51-106.74 NPK kg/ha, was a critical factor in realizing high yields. Principal component analysis (PCA) underlined the role of integrated agronomic practices in maximizing maize production. It provides actionable insight to farmers with respect to maize yield improvement for economic resilience and sustainable agriculture.Overall, this study identified optimal sowing windows, high-yielding varieties, and integrated agronomic practices that significantly enhance wintermaize production under adverse climatic conditions, offering actionable insights for sustainable agriculture.
Keywords: optimal sowing, high-yield varieties, Agronomic practices, climate, Winter Maize
Received: 17 Jan 2025; Accepted: 30 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 KUMAR JAT, Durgude, Meena, Sohane, Singh, Reddy, Kumar, Selvaganesan, Meena, Sharda, Singh, Singh, Kumari, Kumar, Kumar, Lenka, Chaurasiya, Das, Jha, Tripathi and Sagar. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
RAJ KUMAR JAT, CIMMYT-Borlaug Institute for South Asia (BISA),, Samastipur, Bihar, India
Vijay Singh Meena, Indian Agricultural Research Institute (ICAR), New Delhi, India
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.