ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Agron.
Sec. Plant-Soil Interactions
Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fagro.2025.1628600
This article is part of the Research TopicPhysiological Growth of Crops in Saline-Alkali Land and Its New Quality Productive Control MethodsView all 4 articles
Mechanisms of Improved Nitrogen Utilization and Root Architecture in Cotton Under Reduced Fertilization: A Comparative Study of Individual and Group Planting Systems
Provisionally accepted- 1Xinjiang Agricultural University, Ürümqi, China
- 2Shihezi University, Shihezi, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Excessive nitrogen application poses a multifaceted challenge to modern intensive agriculture, causing adverse effects including soil acidification, groundwater contamination and greenhouse gas emissions. These environmental consequences threaten the sustainability of global agricultural systems and impair cotton growth performance and resource-use efficiency. Under China's national policy of zero-growth in fertilizer application, it is critical to elucidate the spatial distribution patterns of cotton root systems under nitrogen reduction conditions, quantify the contributions of water and nitrogen inputs to total nitrogen accumulation in different cotton organs, and analyze water-nitrogen management interactions to enhance water and nitrogen use efficiency in cotton cropping systems. In this study, three irrigation quotas (488 mm, 444 mm, and 400 mm are denoted as W1, W2, and W3) and four nitrogen fertilization levels (440 kg ha -1 , 387 kg ha -1 , 336 kg ha -1 , and 294 kg ha -1 , respectively) were implemented in 2023 through root box and field experiments to investigate root growth dynamics and nitrogen accumulation in cotton fields. Water-nitrogen interactions significantly affected cotton root morphology The mean root diameter in the 15-50 cm soil layer exhibited strong responsiveness to irrigation, with optimal growth observed under the W3N3 treatment (400 mm irrigation and 336 kg ha⁻¹ nitrogen). Under W1 irrigation (488 mm), root length density (RLD) and diameter showed minimal differences between N1 and N2 treatments, whereas root surface area density (RSAD) of the N4 treatment demonstrated significant irrigation-dependent variation. Total nitrogen content across cotton organs followed the order: leaves > stems > roots, showing positive correlation with nitrogen application rate. The irrigation quota (48.0%-51.3%) was found to contribute more to plant nitrogen content than nitrogen application (22.7%-48.7%). Nitrogen application was identified as the primary contributor to soil total nitrogen accumulation in all soil layers within the limited-area study; however, in the open-field experiment, it was observed to contribute most significantly (27.4%) to soil total nitrogen accumulation specifically in the 0-40 cm soil layer. This study provides theoretical and technical support for optimizing cotton production, enhancing water-nitrogen use efficiency, and promoting environmental sustainability in Xinjiang's arid farming systems.
Keywords: Reduced nitrogen fertilization, Single plant, Group of plants, Cotton root growth, Water nitrogen contribution rate
Received: 14 May 2025; Accepted: 20 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Wang, Zhao, Wang and Yang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Jinghua Zhao, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Ürümqi, China
Chunxia Wang, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.