Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Agron.

Sec. Agroecological Cropping Systems

This article is part of the Research TopicAgroecology in Action: Case Studies, Challenges and Best PracticesView all 12 articles

Transitioning from harmful insecticides to agroecological IPM with smallholder vegetable farmers in Ethiopia

Provisionally accepted
Stephanie  WilliamsonStephanie Williamson1Atalo  BelayAtalo Belay2Robert  MensahRobert Mensah3Zemenu  GenetZemenu Genet2Gemeda  KaberoGemeda Kabero2Asaminew  NigussieAsaminew Nigussie2Tadesse  AmeraTadesse Amera2Finbarr  G. HorganFinbarr G. Horgan4,5,6Sheila  WillisSheila Willis1Joey  P. SalmonJoey P. Salmon1Alexander  M. StuartAlexander M. Stuart1*
  • 1Pesticide Action Network UK, Brighton, United Kingdom
  • 2Pesticide Action Nexus Association Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
  • 3Australian Cotton Research Institute, Narrabri, Australia
  • 4EcoLaVerna Integral Restoration Ecology, Cork, Ireland
  • 5The University of Edinburgh Centre for Pesticide Suicide Prevention, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  • 6Escuela de Agronomía, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales, Universidad Catolica del Maule, Talca, Chile

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Lake Ziway in Ethiopia's Central Rift Valley is an important region for vegetable production. Intensive pesticide use in the region has resulted in declining health and negative impacts on the environment. This case study reports on a project to reduce the impacts of pesticide use in smallholder vegetable production. We used Farmer Field School (FFS) training with agroecological integrated pest management (IPM) group learning plots of onion and tomato to help farmers and other stakeholders to transition to safer pest management alternatives. Learning plots were adaptively managed with updated information directly incorporated into stakeholder training. Furthermore, the project adapted for vegetable production a successful biocontrol enhancement method that used vegetation strips as a form of habitat manipulation and locally sourced natural enemy food spray attractants. The project trained over 700 farmers in season-long training and a further 500 via peer mentoring. The final impact survey on trained farmers' changes in pest management found an average 73% reduction in insecticide application frequency compared to before training. Applications of organophosphates were reduced by 96%, and 70% of respondents had eliminated their use. 85% of surveyed farmers reported they now apply food spray and sow habitat strips of alfalfa or maize, while 60% of farmers reported they avoid insecticides harmful to natural enemies. Furthermore, the self-reported yearly incidence rate of acute pesticide poisoning reduced from 20% of farmers surveyed in the baseline survey to 5.5% in the endline survey, without adversely affecting yields or profits, often with positive gains. The project demonstrates that, by adopting an agroecological approach, economically sustainable vegetable production can be achieved while greatly reducing the pesticide footprint. Our experience also shows how successful technologies developed for one crop can be transferred to other crops (i.e. onion and tomato) through the active participation and support of end-use stakeholders.

Keywords: biological control, crop protection, natural enemies, tropical entomology, Vegetable Crop Pests

Received: 28 Jul 2025; Accepted: 21 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Williamson, Belay, Mensah, Genet, Kabero, Nigussie, Amera, Horgan, Willis, Salmon and Stuart. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Alexander M. Stuart, alex@pan-uk.org

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.