ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Endocrinol.
Sec. Cancer Endocrinology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1513893
Use and utility of Endocrine Multidisciplinary Tumour Board: an appraisal from a tertiary centre
Provisionally accepted- 1University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- 2Endocrinology Unit, Department of Experimental, Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence, florence, Italy
- 3Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, florence, Italy
- 4Head and Neck Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, florence, Italy
- 5Department of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, florence, Italy
- 6Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Experimental, Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence, florence, Italy
- 7Endocrinology Unit, Medical-Geriatric Department, Careggi University Hospital, florence, Italy
- 8Department of Histopathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Careggi University Hospital, florence, Italy
- 9Unit of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Image Diagnostics, Careggi University Hospital, florence, Italy
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The Endocrine Multidisciplinary Tumour Board (EMTB) is a specialised board for endocrine tumours, including thyroid, adrenal, and rare endocrine neoplasms. Although required by major guidelines, little is known about the current EMTB composition and working outcomes. The present study aims to analyse the use and support provided by an experienced EMTB, highlighting the skills of this board.Methods: This monocentric and retrospective study considered all the cases discussed (N=1038, concerning 835 patients) within the ETMB of Careggi University Hospital of Florence from January 1st, 2021, to December 31st, 2023. The queries have been standardised into five major groups.Besides treatment and follow-up indications, particular attention has been paid to the need for repeated discussions, additional indications, imaging revisions, and overall survival (OS) outcomes.Results: Thyroid and rare cancers were the most frequently represented (64% and 32%, respectively).At logistic regression analysis, the need for multiple discussions was associated with being a rare disease (p<0.001), familiar syndrome (p=0.003), or adrenal masses (p=0.005). When the query was "imaging review," external imaging was more often re-evaluated (p=0.027) due to differing results at EMTB revision, and in about 51% of these cases, further insights were requested. Compared to external control groups, Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma and Adrenocortical Carcinoma showed improved OS, 7.84 vs 2.46 months (p=0.049) and 51.92 vs 26.17 months (p=0.0076), respectively.From the hormonal perspective, further hormonal investigations were required in about 16% of eligible cases.Conclusions: EMTB is pivotal in managing and optimising common and rare endocrine tumour workups.
Keywords: Multidisciplinary tumour board, Endocrine neoplasms, Thyroid Neoplasms, Health Care, Rare Diseases
Received: 19 Oct 2024; Accepted: 30 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Sparano, Canu, Perigli, Santoro, Pradella, Grazzini, Mangoni, Simontacchi, Fibbi, Vezzosi, Olianti, Maggi and Petrone. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Luisa Petrone, Endocrinology Unit, Medical-Geriatric Department, Careggi University Hospital, florence, Italy
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.