HYPOTHESIS AND THEORY article
Front. Allergy
Sec. Mechanisms in Allergy
Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/falgy.2025.1576102
This article is part of the Research TopicAtopic March and Atopic MultimorbidityView all 7 articles
Reducing ocular Demodex using petroleum jelly alleviates dry eye syndrome, blepharitis, facial dermatoses, ocular and respiratory allergies, and decreases associated prescribing: a hypothesis
Provisionally accepted- Independent Research Pharmacist, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Demodex eyelash mites are increasingly associated with eye and skin inflammation in humans, and cause demodectic mange in mammals. Informal accounts of symptom improvement and reduced need for anti-allergy medicines, when Demodex reproduction is prevented, indicate a further role linking Demodex to rhinitis, asthma and dermatitis. Their mobility, allergenic debris and consequential immunological impact may also explain progression of allergies in the ‘allergic march’. Being photophobic and nocturnal, Demodex folliculorum shelter, feed, and sleep in eyelash follicles during daylight. Coston (1967) speculated that Demodex emerge to mate during darkness and observed that medicated ointments rubbed into the eyelid margins at bedtime treated Demodex blepharitis effectively, presumably by preventing mating. Sixteen cases are described retrospectively whereby interested volunteers adopted Coston’s technique, using unmedicated petroleum jelly. To break the lifecycle, a minimum 28-day course was advised, though concordance varied. Fourteen people reported relief from a surprising range of symptoms including not only dry eye and blepharitis but also rhinitis, asthma, angioedema and seborrhoeic dermatitis. Analysis of GP prescribing data in three volunteers allowed comparison of five-year periods immediately before and after starting continuous treatment. Mean yearly issues of anti-allergy and antimicrobial medicines reduced from 15.6 (range 8-25) to 1.8 (range 0-4), representing an 88.5% decrease for Volunteer 1 and from 5.8 (range 3-9) and 14.2 issues (range 9-14) to zero for both Volunteer 2 and Volunteer 13 respectively, representing 100% reductions in prescribing. Exacerbations of acne and dermatitis in two cases illustrate possible Demodex involvement in common dermatoses. This account is limited by its informal and retrospective nature in a disparate cohort, without assessment of Demodex levels. These preliminary observations support the hypothesis that Demodex allergens may trigger facial, ocular and respiratory inflammation and that reducing mite count with petroleum jelly improves symptoms. Formal clinical trials are needed to test this hypothesis.
Keywords: Demodex, Blepharitis, Asthma, Rhinitis, allergy, Dermatitis, prescribing, Petroleum jelly
Received: 13 Feb 2025; Accepted: 09 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Senior-Fletcher. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Diana Elizabeth Senior-Fletcher, Independent Research Pharmacist, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.