ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Allergy
Sec. Therapies and Therapeutic Targets
Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/falgy.2025.1636425
This article is part of the Research TopicBradykinin and Histamine Mediated AngioedemaView all 9 articles
One-Year Real-Life Outcomes of Lanadelumab Therapy in Romanian Patients with Hereditary Angioedema Due to C1-inhibitor Deficiency
Provisionally accepted- Faculty of Medicine, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology of Târgu Mureş, Târgu Mureș, Romania
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
In the majority of patients with hereditary angioedema (HAE) due to C1-inhibitor deficiency (HAE-C1INH), effective long-term prophylactic (LTP) treatment can achieve complete disease control.Lanadelumab is one of the first-line option recommended for this purpose.Our study aimed to evaluate changes in disease control, quality of life, and attack frequency among Romanian HAE-C1INH patients, during the first year of treatment with lanadelumab. This non-interventional prospective study included the Romanian HAE-C1INH patients enrolled in the first year of the national lanadelumab treatment program. Angioedema Control Test, (AECT), Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire (AE-QoL) and attacks frequency were recorded at baseline and at three, six, nine and 12 months. Twenty-four patients (14 women [58.3%], 10 men [41.7%]) initiated lanadelumab therapy, with a mean age of 40.7 years. Most had HAE-C1INH type I (22 patients, 91.7%), and one patient was under 18 years of age. Ten patients switched from LTP with intravenous plasma-derived C1-INH, while 14 were previously managed with on-demand therapy only. Baseline scores were: AECT 4.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 2.0), AE-QoL 66.1 (standard deviation [SD] 18.3), and a mean attack frequency of 10.0 (IQR 4.0) (over the preceding three months). Improvements were observed at each follow-up point, with respective scores at three, six, nine and 12 months as follows: three months: AECT 12.0 (IQR 5.8) / AE-QoL 35.3 (SD 23.2)/ attacks 3.4 (IQR 5.0); six months: AECT 12.3 (IQR 5.3) / AE-QoL 35.4 (SD 25.4)/ attacks 2.8 (IQR 4.8); nine months:AECT 12.6 (IQR 5.8) / AE-QoL 34.1 (SD 23.2)/ attacks 2.2 (IQR 3.8) and 12 months: AECT 12.9 (IQR 5.5) / AE-QoL 32.1 (SD 21.6) / attacks 1.4 (IQR 2.0). Seven patients became symptom-free after the first dose, and four more achieved this status within the first three months.LTP with lanadelumab provided effective disease control and significantly improved quality of life in patients with HAE-C1INH over the course of one year. Regular evaluations at relatively short intervals by the availability and ease of administration of validated questionnaires serve as a useful tool for clinicians in the comprehensive assessment of HAE patients and offer a valuable means of monitoring treatment effectiveness.
Keywords: hereditary angioedema, C1-Inhibitor, Treatment, Outcome, Lanadelumab
Received: 27 May 2025; Accepted: 06 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Bara, Nadasan and Deleanu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Noémi Anna Bara, Faculty of Medicine, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology of Târgu Mureş, Târgu Mureș, Romania
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.