Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Allergy

Sec. Food Allergy

Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/falgy.2025.1648262

Linear and conformational epitopes of Vicilin-buried peptides as a model for improved nut allergy diagnostics

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Southern Regional Research Center, Agricultural Research Service (USDA), New Orleans, United States
  • 2Delgado Community College, New Orleans, United States
  • 3University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences College of Medicine, Little Rock, United States
  • 4Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock, United States
  • 5University of Colorado Denver, Denver, United States
  • 6Rochester Regional Health, Rochester, United States
  • 7University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, United States
  • 8Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, United States
  • 9University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, United States
  • 10USDA-ARS Genomics and Bioinformatics Research Unit, Gainesville, United States
  • 11National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Individuals allergic to peanuts (PN) may show IgE cross-reactivity to tree nuts, especially walnuts (WN), which often complicates diagnosis. Vicilin-buried peptides (VBPs), short segments within the N-terminal vicilin leader sequence (LS), contribute to cross-reactivity due to their ubiquitous and highly conserved and stable α-hairpin structures. The binding patterns of cross-reactive IgE to linear and conformational epitopes of PN and WN LSs and constituent VBPs may serve as a model for understanding clinically symptomatic cross-reactivity. Serum samples (n=30) from primarily oral food challenge-positive individuals with PN allergy (PNA, 33%), WN allergy (WNA, 47%), and PN and WN allergies (PWA, 20%) were collected. These sera and a monoclonal IgE antibody (6D12) were examined for IgE binding with microarrays of overlapping peptides from native Ara h 1 LS (AH1LS, Ara h 1.0101 (26-84)) and recombinant Jug r 2 LS (JR2LS, Jug r 2.0101 (1-173)) and via direct and competitive inhibition ELISA with intact LSs and constituent VBPs from PN (AH1.1) and WN (JR2.1, JR2.2, JR2.3). A mixed model analysis assessed the contribution of IgE binding patterns to VBPs in relation to PNA, WNA, or PWA status. All three intact WN VBPs bound IgE at similar frequencies, with individual sera showing varying preferences for specific VBPs. AH1.1 was less recognized by WNA individuals but more frequently recognized by PNA and PWA subjects. WN VBPs were recognized by PNA sera samples at rates comparable to AH1.1. Our data indicated that each VBP can bind with high affinity to one IgE molecule. In a competitive inhibition ELISA, combining VBP competitors did not enhance inhibition compared to the dominant VBP, suggesting that both high- and low-affinity VBPs compete for the same monoclonal IgE in serum. This observation was mimicked by 6D12, a monoclonal IgE against JR2.1. Cross-reactivity among VBPs most likely arises from monoclonal IgE binding to α-hairpin structures and their overlapping linear amino acid sequences. The combination of linear and conformational IgE binding patterns enabled us to differentiate between the WNA, PNA, and PWA groups in this study and may assist us in using AH1LS and JR2LS to distinguish PN and WN allergies in the future.

Keywords: Cross reactivity, Peanut allergy, Tree nut allergy, IgE, Vicilin (7S), Epitopes. Ethics statements

Received: 16 Jun 2025; Accepted: 12 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Swientoniewski, Rambo, Nesbit, Cheng, Gipson, Jones, Doan, Dreskin, Mustafa, Smith, Kulis, Rivers, Foo, Mueller and Maleki. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Soheila June Maleki, Southern Regional Research Center, Agricultural Research Service (USDA), New Orleans, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.