Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Allergy

Sec. Mechanisms in Allergy

This article is part of the Research TopicAllergen cross-reactivity - a challenge in daily practiceView all 3 articles

IgE Sensitization to House Dust Mite and Cockroach Allergens in Asthmatic and Allergic Patients in the Tropics

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Institute for Immunological Research, University of Cartagena, Cartagena, Colombia
  • 2Clinica Respiratoria y de Alergias, Cartagena, Colombia, Cartagena, Colombia
  • 3Laboratorio de Diagnóstico Biológico del Servicio de Alergia del Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
  • 4Universidad Cardenal Herrera CEU, Valencia, Spain

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction: House dust mite (HDM) allergens are major triggers of IgE-mediated asthma in tropical regions, yet the role of cockroach allergens and their cross-reactivity with HDM remains unclear. Cross reactivity among invertebrate allergens is a common challenge in daily practice specially to define primary sensitizers and reactions of clinical relevance. Multiplexed arrays for molecular allergology constitute a useful tool for better detection and interpretation of cross-reactions. Methods: We assessed specific IgE levels and skin prick test reactivity to American cockroach and HDM allergens in cohorts of allergic and asthmatic patients from Cartagena, Colombia, using ImmunoCAP™, skin testing, and multiplex molecular allergology (ALEX2). Results: Cockroach sensitization was present in 29–40% of patients but elicited significantly lower IgE responses and smaller skin test wheals compared to HDM. Most cockroach-sensitized individuals were co-sensitized to HDM, with limited recognition of cockroach molecular components. Mean specific IgE levels to cockroach were 2.1 kU/L ranging from 0.1 to 25.8 kU/L. The majority of patients had IgE levels in class 1 (0.35-0.70 kU/L) or class 2 (0.70-3.5 kU/L). In the ALEX2 array, most cockroach sensitized patients (by skin tests) did not recognize the Periplaneta americana extract (Per a) or other cockroach allergens in the array, and instead they recognized HDM allergens and the extracts of crustaceans and mollusks. Only one patient recognized the Per a extract, cockroach tropomyosin (Per a 7), and tropomyosins in HDM (Blo t 10, Der p 10), shrimp (Pen m 1), and Anisakis simplex (Ani s 3) together with other allergens in crustaceans and mollusks. Interestingly, IgE reactivity to cross-reactive allergens like arginine kinase, myosin light chain, sarcoplasmic calcium-binding protein was not detected. Cockroach sensitization was not associated with worsened asthma control or lung function but correlated with higher shrimp-specific IgE in patients reporting shellfish allergy. Discussion: HDM allergens induce stronger IgE responses than cockroach in this tropical population, indicating HDM as the primary sensitizers. Cockroach sensitization often reflects cross-reactivity and requires careful clinical evaluation to determine its relevance.

Keywords: Cockroach, House dust mite, IgE sensitization, cross-reactivity, Shellfish allergy, shrimp, Component resolved diagnosis

Received: 18 Oct 2025; Accepted: 28 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Reina, Acevedo, Caballero, Gil, López Salgueiro and Caraballo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Nathalie Acevedo

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.