Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Anim. Sci.

Sec. Animal Welfare and Policy

Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fanim.2025.1400288

An overview of the national cattle health and welfare related information systems in Estonia, Finland, Sweden and Germany

Provisionally accepted
Tuija  KallioTuija Kallio1Anri  TimonenAnri Timonen1*Hardi  TammHardi Tamm2Anne  PõderAnne Põder3Martin  KukkMartin Kukk3Natascha  SchlerethNatascha Schlereth4Pia  UlvenbladPia Ulvenblad5Per-Ola  UlvenbladPer-Ola Ulvenblad5Elisa  TikkanenElisa Tikkanen1Pekka  KilpeläinenPekka Kilpeläinen1Henrik  BarthHenrik Barth5Getachew  Abate KassaGetachew Abate Kassa4Ants-Hannes  ViiraAnts-Hannes Viira3
  • 1Unit of Measurement Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Northern Ostrobothnia, Finland
  • 2Estonian Dairy Cluster, Tartu, Tartu County, Estonia
  • 3Chair of Economics in Rural Economy, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, Tartu County, Estonia
  • 4School of Management, Chair of Agricultural Production and Resource Economics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
  • 5School of Business, Innovation and Sustainability, Halmstad University, Halmstad, Halland, Sweden

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The digitalization of cattle husbandry has increased the cattle health and welfare related data creation and collection to multiple information systems (IS). We described nationally widely used cattle health and welfare data containing ISs in Estonia, Finland, Germany, and Sweden by studying the ownership of them, as well as funding, developmental views, data access, data ownership, and data integration between other ISs. Additionally, we described the ISs with experts and stakeholders in interviews and living labs (LL). The number of statutory ISs was two in every study country and the number of non-statutory ISs was one in Estonia and Sweden, and four in Finland and Germany. The IS providers and data integration possibilities between the systems differed by study countries, while the type of collected data and the IS funding policies stayed similar. In LLs, congruent views about the importance of standardization of the collected data and the usability of that data for farm decision-making and improvement in management practices were mentioned as main challenges for future development. To gain full benefit from the collected data, data from automatic milking systems should be integrable with data collected to other ISs. In future, data integration should be improved for user-friendly approach of cattle health and welfare related ISs and utilization of the collected data for animal health and welfare improvement should be implemented within the cattle value chain to ensure the sustainability of the industry. Common will between public and private operators as well as cross-border multidisciplinary co-operation are required to fulfill these goals.

Keywords: Cattle, Data, Information System, Animal Health, Animal Welfare

Received: 13 Mar 2024; Accepted: 29 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Kallio, Timonen, Tamm, Põder, Kukk, Schlereth, Ulvenblad, Ulvenblad, Tikkanen, Kilpeläinen, Barth, Abate Kassa and Viira. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Anri Timonen, Unit of Measurement Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, 90590, Northern Ostrobothnia, Finland

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.