ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Anim. Sci.

Sec. Animal Nutrition

Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fanim.2025.1544988

This article is part of the Research TopicInnovative Nutritional Technologies for Sustainable Ruminant FarmingView all 6 articles

Paper packaging included in a small fraction of the diet of confined lambs

Provisionally accepted
Mônica  Márcia SilvaMônica Márcia Silva*Daniela  AlmeidaDaniela AlmeidaAmanda  CarvalhoAmanda CarvalhoBruna  MaioliBruna MaioliVicenti  KleinVicenti KleinLeticia  GonçalvesLeticia GonçalvesMatheus  CarlisMatheus CarlisSarita  Bonagurio GalloSarita Bonagurio Gallo
  • University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

In ruminant production systems, packaging is commonly used for the transport and storage of feed ingredients such as grains and minerals. The development of edible, cellulose-based packaging that can be safely ingested by ruminants offers a promising approach to reducing environmental waste on farms. This study aimed to evaluate the inclusion of edible paper packaging in the diets of lambs and its effects on nutrient digestibility, nitrogen balance, growth performance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality. Twenty crossbred lambs, 3 months old; initial body weight of 23.40 ± 1.00 kg, were randomly assigned to two dietary treatments: a control diet without packaging (CTL) and a diet including edible paper packaging (PACK). The experiment was in a completely randomized design, with two treatments and ten replications. Data were analyzed using Tukey's test at a 5% significance level. No significant differences (P > 0.05) were observed between treatments for dry matter intake or apparent nutrient digestibility. Growth performance was not affected (P > 0.05). However, cold carcass yield was reduced (P = 0.043), and higher cooking losses (P = 0.011) were observed in the PACK group. The inclusion of edible paper packaging can be used in lamb diets, as it did not alter dry matter intake or nutrient intake, and therefore did not affect production performance, most carcass characteristics, or meat quality, except for cold carcass yield and water loss during cooking.

Keywords: Sheep, Lignin, carcass, Digestibility, Residue, Natural Polymers

Received: 13 Dec 2024; Accepted: 16 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Silva, Almeida, Carvalho, Maioli, Klein, Gonçalves, Carlis and Gallo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Mônica Márcia Silva, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.