ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Anim. Sci.
Sec. Animal Welfare and Policy
Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fanim.2025.1573847
This article is part of the Research TopicEmotion, Affective State and Animal ExperienceView all 3 articles
Judgment Bias, Fear, and Stress Responses of Red Junglefowl and Athens Canadian Random Bred Chickens
Provisionally accepted
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, North Carolina, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Understanding how poultry perceive and interpret their environment is essential to enhancing their welfare. Animal welfare science relies on measures of the behavioral and physiological components of affective states (positive and negative) as welfare indicators. There has been growing interest in using the judgment bias test (JBT) to study birds’ affective states by assessing their responses to ambiguous cues. The objective of this study was to investigate the affective state of two chicken breeds with different evolutionary histories: the Red Junglefowl (RJF), the primary ancestor of modern chickens, and the Athens Canadian Random Bred (ACRB), a rustic domesticated breed, using the JBT at two ages. Another objective was to explore the effect of the JBT on the fear and stress responses of the chickens that participated in the JBT compared to those that did not (NJBT) on days (D) 35 and 63. Fear was evaluated using the tonic immobility test, and stress was measured noninvasively from thermal images of the eye and beak. Chickens successfully discriminated between positive (POS) and neutral (NEU) JBT cues, showing shorter latencies to approach the POS cue (P < 0.0001). While there were no breed differences on D29 of the JBT, RJF chickens exhibited shorter latencies to approach cues than ACRB on D60 (P < 0.001). Independent of testing at both ages, RJF had a longer duration of tonic immobility than ACRB (P < 0.01), indicating higher fearfulness. While the JBT did not affect D35 tonic immobility, JBT chickens had longer tonic immobility durations than NJBT on D63 (P < 0.05). Chickens that participated in the JBT had lower eye and beak minimum surface temperatures than NJBT (P < 0.05), indicating that the JBT may have increased stress post-testing. These findings highlight the influence of domestication on the affective states and the importance of considering fear and stress in measuring the affective states of chickens.
Keywords: chicken, Cognition, Domestication, Fear, stress
Received: 10 Feb 2025; Accepted: 28 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Oyeniran, Whittle, Orlowski and Weimer. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Shawna L Weimer, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, 72701, North Carolina, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.