Biphasic effects of Callicarpa nudiflora water extract on rumen fermentation in vitro and microbial communities in sheep

Abstract

Introduction:

This study investigated the effects of varying doses of Callicarpa nudiflora water extract (CW) on in vitro rumen fermentation and sheep microbial activity.

Methods:

Four rumen-cannulated hybrid sheep were selected to provide mixed rumen fluid, and the powder substrate remained consistent with the diet fed to the sheep. A total of 14 supplementation levels (0–25 g/kg fresh substrate) of CW were designed based on a completely randomized design, including 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20 and 25 g/kg. Each treatment was replicated in duplicate across three independent batches, resulting in a total of six biological replicates per treatment. The flasks were incubated at 39°C for 24 hours in water with a rotation speed of 80 r/min.

Results:

It showed that adding CW significantly affected in vitro rumen fermentation in sheep and displayed a biphasic action: The supplementation levels of 4 g/kg and 6 g/kg showed an improvement in the fermentation status and nitrogen utilization efficiency with the enhanced microbial protein concentration from 1.98 mg/mL (Con) to 2.84 mg/mL (P < 0.001) and the relative abundance of total bacteria from 4.05 (Con) to 5.27 (P < 0.001); When the dose surpassed 14g/kg, the decline in the hemicellulose degradation rate from 63.00% (Con) to 40.24% (P < 0.001), accompanied by an increase in ammonia-nitrogen (NH₃−N) concentration from 173.37 mg/L (Con) to 177.46 mg/L (P = 0.020) and total gas production from 154.87 mL/g (Con) to 161.47 mL/g (P =0.007), signaled abnormal alterations in the fermentation process.

Conclusions:

The optimal supplementation range in feed formulations was established as 4−6g/kg, showing that CW could serve as a natural rumen modulator for sheep.

1 Introduction

In recent decades, due to the irrational use of antibiotics, concerns about the increasing number of antibiotic-resistant bacteria have prompted efforts to develop antibiotic alternatives (Cheng et al., 2014). Plant secondary metabolites, previously considered antinutritional factors, have been found to have high potential in improving ruminant production performance and rumen fermentation (Greathead, 2003). Plant extracts refer to active ingredients or combinations of ingredients isolated from plants through physical or chemical methods, which can prevent oxidative stress (Mthiyane et al., 2023) and eliminate free radicals (Yagi et al., 2024). Research has shown that plant extracts and their derived secondary metabolites, such as flavonoids, polyphenols, polysaccharides, and alkaloids, exhibit strong antioxidant effects (Gill et al., 2020; Yeshi et al., 2022).

Plant extracts are widely used as green additives in medicine, agriculture, food, and cosmetics (Vijayaraghavan and Ashokkumar, 2017), especially in ruminant animal feed with good application effects. Adding specific plant extracts can regulate rumen microbial community structure and fermentation in sheep (Faniyi et al., 2016), but their effects vary depending on the type, concentration, and target of the extracts. For example, 3% extract of wolfberry branches and leaves (Duan et al., 2024) reduced the NH₃–N concentration in the rumen of Hu sheep through bioactive ingredients; 4% Quebracho extract (Vera et al., 2022) significantly increased the ratio of propionic acid to acetic acid and inhibited butyric acid production. However, the dose of CW needs to be precisely controlled: Macleaya cordata extract had no significant effect on dry matter digestion rate of the rumen fermentation with a content of less than 0.21%, while it inhibited the digestion rate with a content of more than 0.31% (Zeng et al., 2021).

Callicarpa nudiflora (Verbenaceae) is a common medicinal plant in China, mainly distributed in Hainan Province, Guangdong Province, and Guangxi Province, as well as in countries such as Malaysia and Singapore (Ma et al., 2022). Callicarpa nudiflora contains various compounds, such as terpenes and flavonoids (Lin et al., 2024), and these active ingredients may be key to exerting medicinal values in anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, antioxidant, and hemostatic effects (Nong et al., 2024). Some studies have indicated that feeding rats with C. nudiflora water extract (CW) can inhibit inflammation and regulate gut microbiota (Nong et al., 2024). Adding CW (150 mg/kg) could improve oral glucose tolerance and lipid metabolism in diabetic rats and reverse the damage in the liver and pancreas caused by diabetes (Ma et al., 2019). By supplementing CW in broiler feed, it was found that 300–700 mg/kg of CW improved the growth performance, immune function, and intestinal health of broiler chickens (Liu et al., 2024a). Zhuang (2018) added different levels of CW to pig feed and found that it did not have adverse effects on animals at up to five times the dose (15.0 g/kg) and that the level of CW at 3.0 g/kg had a better growth-promoting effect on pigs. Although the application research of CW in ruminants is rare, it is speculated that the application of CW in ruminants is feasible due to its similar composition to other plant extracts mentioned above. Given CW’s bioactive compounds’ proven antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects in monogastric animals, this study hypothesizes that CW could similarly modulate rumen fermentation and microbial health in sheep. According to Ma et al. (2019); Liu et al. (2024a), and Zhuang (2018), the appropriate dose of CW increased proportionally with body weight across species, ranging from 150 mg/kg in rats to 3 g/kg in pigs and chickens. Meanwhile, the microorganisms in the rumen may deplete some CW, suggesting that the dosage of CW in sheep should be higher than that in pig feed (3–15 g/kg).

This study investigated the effects of different CW levels on fermentation parameters through in-vitro rumen fermentation experiments for exploring the appropriate supplementation levels of CW for sheep application, thus offering a promising natural strategy to enhance feed efficiency and animal health in ruminant nutrition.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Animals and diets

Four rumen-cannulated (cannulated at 6 months of age) hybrid sheep (small-tailed Han sheep × Dorper sheep) were selected to provide mixed rumen fluid for in-vitro rumen fermentation. The sheep were 8 months old, with an average weight of 35.27 ± 4.98 kg. During the experiment, feeding was conducted twice a day at 7:00 and 17:00, and water was withheld for 12 h before collecting rumen fluid.

The diet was fed to all four experimental sheep with no CW treatment through TMR pellets based on the NRC (Council, 2007). The composition and nutritional levels of the diet are presented in Table 1. The substrate for in-vitro fermentation was prepared by grinding the diet, previously fed to experimental sheep, through a 0.45-mm sieve. The freeze-dried powder of the CW, with the secondary metabolites shown in Table 1, was provided by the Fairy Lake Botanical Garden, Shenzhen and the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Dried leaves of C. nudiflora were collected and ground to a fine powder through an 80-mesh sieve, and 1 kg of the powder was boiled in 2 L of water for 1 h, followed by filtration. The residue was then boiled again in 1.5 L of water for 1 h and filtered. The combined filtrates were obtained as the total extract. After freeze-drying, 268 g of the dried extract powder was finally obtained (Li et al., 2022a). Based on previous studies as well as the NRC (Council, 2007) on the application of plant extracts in ruminants and the chemical composition of CW, the supplementation levels in the diet of sheep were inferred. A total of 14 supplementation levels of CW were arranged in a completely randomized design, i.e., 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, and 25 g/kg of fresh matter (FM), corresponding to the treatments Con, CW-0.5, CW-1, CW-2, CW-3, CW-4, CW-6, CW-8, CW-10, CW-12, CW-14, CW-16, CW-20, and CW-25, respectively.

2.2 In-vitro rumen fermentation

The mixed ruminal fluid was collected from the four trial sheep, filtered through a four-layer cheesecloth, and mixed with preheated artificial saliva at a ratio of 2:1 (buffer:ruminal fluid, v:v; Menke et al., 1979). The buffered ruminal fluid (60 mL) was dispensed into prewarmed 100-mL incubation flasks. One gram of each substrate was blended with buffered ruminal fluid in each incubation flask. After introducing CO₂, the incubation flasks were incubated at 39°C for 24 h in water with a rotation speed of 80 r/min. During the fermentation period, the pressure inside the incubation flask was measured by inserting a 0.6-mm needle attached to a pressure transducer (model 2000A4, Xian special instrument, China) as described by Nanon et al. (2014). The pressure was measured at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h, and the gas was released after each measurement. After 24 h, the incubation flasks were placed on ice to stop the fermentation process. Each treatment was duplicated across three independent batches, yielding six biological replicates per treatment. In addition, two blank controls containing only buffered ruminal fluid were included in each batch. The incubation flask was opened when the fermentation process was stopped, and the pH was measured using a LAQUA twin pH meter (HORIBA, Ltd., Japan). The fermentation fluid was divided into different cryovials and stored at −80°C for chemical and microbiological analyses.

2.3 Microbiological analysis

Microbial genomic DNA was extracted from 220 mg of fermentation fluid using the methods described by Murray and Thompson (1980) and Zhou et al. (1996). The qualified DNA was tested for real-time qPCR using the Applied Biosystems StepOne Real-time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Massachusetts, USA) based on the methods of Denman and McSweeney (2006). The designed primers for total bacteria, archaea, and fungi are shown in Table 2. The reaction system (25 μL) consists of SYBR Premix Ex Taq [RR420A, Takara Bio (Dalian) Co., Ltd., Dalian, China] 12.5 μL, forward primer 0.5 μL, reverse primer 0.5 μL, DNA template 2.0 μL, and sterile distilled water 9.5 μL. The reaction conditions were as follows: 95°C for 2 min; 95°C for 5 s; 60°C for 30 s; 40 cycles; 95°C for 15 s; 60°C for 1 min; and 95°C for 15 s. The protozoa were measured under a ×10 magnification microscope (ZEISS Group, Germany) and calculated using an optical microscope according to the method of Antonius et al. (2024).

2.4 Chemical analyses

The fermentation fluid was extracted (3 mL) for the determination of NH₃–N (Preston, 1998) using an ultraviolet spectrophotometer [UV-2550, SHIMADZU (China) Co., Ltd.] and of microbial protein (MCP; Makkar et al., 1982) using a microplate reader [SpectraMax PLUS 384, Molecular Devices (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.]. Another 1 mL of fermentation fluid was analyzed for volatile fatty acids (VFAs), including acetic acid (AA), propionic acid (PA), and butyric acid (BA), using gas chromatography (Agilent Technologies 7890A GC System, USA) according to the method described by Castro-Montoya et al. (2012). The chromatographic column is a Nukol column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm, Supelco), and the detector is a flame ionization detector (FID). The left fluid and substrate were dried in a forced-air oven at 60°C for 72 h and placed in sealed containers to analyze the dry matter (DM; Horwitz, 2006). The filter bag technique of ANKOM A200 was adopted to analyze neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent lignin (ADL), and acid detergent fiber (ADF) according to the methods of van Soest et al. (1991).

2.5 Data analysis

The total gas production (TGP) was calculated based on Equations 1, 2 following the method described by Theodorou et al. (1994). The relative content of bacteria, archaea, and fungi was determined according to Livak and Schmittgen (2002). The content of cellulose and hemicellulose was calculated by the method of van Soest et al. (1991). The degradation rate of nutrients was calculated according to Equation 3. Data were evaluated for normality of residuals by the Shapiro–Wilk test (α = 0.05). Data conforming to normal distribution were subjected to a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Duncan’s multiple comparisons and an orthogonal polynomial using SPSS 25.0 (International Business Machines Corporation, New York, USA), with alphabetical superscripts indicating homogeneous subgroups. Differences were considered statistically significant at P ≤0.05. Principal component analysis (PCA) and correlation analysis (Ding et al., 2022) were conducted using the ggplot package and pheatmap package of R language (Version 4.0).

where GP_t is the gas production volume of the sample at time t (mL/g substrate), P_t is the gas production pressure at time t (kPa), V₁ is the volume of the incubation flask (mL), V₂ is the volume of the buffered ruminal fluid (mL), and M is the weight of the sample (g).

where TGP is the total gas production (mL/g substrate), GP_t is the gas production volume of the sample at time t (mL/g), and n is the total number of measurements taken.

where m₁ is the weight of a certain nutrient in the substrate before fermentation (g), and m₂ is the residual weight of that nutrient in the substrate after 24 h of fermentation (g).

3 Results

3.1 In-vitro rumen fermentation characteristics

The effects of CW on rumen fermentation parameters in vitro are presented in Table 3. Different supplementation levels of CW showed significant dose effects on most fermentation indicators but had no significant effect on pH (ANOVA P = 0.094), indicating that the extract did not significantly alter the rumen acid–base environment. NH₃–N and MCP exhibited significant biphasic effects. The concentration of NH₃–N showed a U-shaped trend (quadratic P = 0.043) with the increasing dose of CW, with the lowest concentration appearing at CW-6 (162.69 mg/L) and the highest appearing at CW-25 (177.46 mg/L). On the contrary, MCP showed an inverted U-shaped trend (quadratic P < 0.001), with the highest concentration observed in CW-6 (2.84 mg/mL) and the lowest observed in CW-25 (1.06 mg/mL). VFAs continued to decrease with the increasing dose of CW (P < 0.001), reaching the lowest concentration of 87.66 mmol/L in CW-6. There was no significant difference in PA among the groups (ANOVA P = 0.329). However, due to significant changes in AA (with the lowest concentration in CW-4, 49.02 mmol/L, ANOVA P < 0.001), there was a significant increase in A/P (linear P = 0.001), gradually rising from 1.97 (Con) to 2.49 (CW-25). The significant U-shaped trend in BA (quadratic P < 0.001) was similar to the VFAs (quadratic P < 0.001), reaching the lowest concentration (11.02 mmol/L) in CW-8.

3.2 Gas production

Table 4 shows the effects of CW on TGP of in-vitro fermentation. At 24 h, TGP showed a U-shaped trend with the increasing dose of CW (quadratic P = 0.008), with the lowest rate appearing at CW-6 (141.68 mL/g) and the highest rate appearing at CW-25 (161.47 mL/g). Analysis of TGP across fermentation phases revealed that treatment groups exhibited significant divergence (ANOVA P < 0.001) during both the initial phase (0–1 h) and terminal phase (12–24 h), whereas no significant differences (ANOVA P > 0.05) were observed in the intermediate phases (1–12 h). In the initial phase (0–1 h), TGP was the lowest at CW-6 (0.5 h: 12.87 mL/g; 1 h: 31.91 mL/g) and the highest at CW-25 (0.5 h: 15.75 mL/g; 1 h: 38.00 mL/g).

3.3 Nutrition composition degradability in vitro

As shown in Figure 1, supplementing CW showed a significant effect on the degradation rate of nutrients in vitro (ANOVA P < 0.001), which was observed as an inverted U-shaped trend (quadratic P < 0.05). When the dose of CW was less than 4 g/kg, the degradability of all indicators significantly increased with the increasing dose of CW. When the dose of CW was 4 g/kg (CW-4), the degradation rates of DM (71.04%), NDF (56.71%), ADF (39.36%), cellulose (48.38%), and hemicellulose (72.51%) all reached their peak rates. When the dose of CW exceeded 6 g/kg (CW-6), the degradability of all indicators significantly decreased with the increasing dose of CW. When the dose of CW was greater than 14 g/kg (CW-14), all indicators showed a significant decrease, indicating that rumen fermentation might be affected. When the dose of CW was 25 g/kg (CW-25), the degradation rates of DM, NDF, ADF, cellulose, and hemicellulose all reached their lowest rates, which were 49.47%, 36.69%, 30.59%, 35.6%, and 40.24%, respectively. It was worth mentioning that the degradation rate of hemicellulose fluctuated more than the other indicators (from 72.51% to 40.24%).

Figure 1

3.4 Rumen microbial community in vitro

Table 5 shows the effects of CW on microbial communities of in-vitro fermentation. As the CW dose increased, the relative concentration of bacteria showed a U-shaped trend (quadratic P < 0.001). The relative concentration of bacteria gradually increased from Con (4.05) to CW-8 (5.29) but began to decrease after CW-8 and reached its lowest point at CW-25 (3.44). The number of archaea gradually decreased with increasing extract concentration (linear P < 0.001) with the highest in Con (5.15) and the lowest in CW-25 (3.45). The change in fungal quantity was significantly decreasing (linear P = 0.013), and the overall fluctuation was relatively small. It reached its highest value at CW-4 (1.76) and dropped to its lowest value at CW-25 (0.95). The concentration of protozoa showed a U-shaped trend with an increasing dose of CW (ANOVA P = 0.007; quadratic P = 0.052). From 4.97 log CFU/mL (Con) to 4.05 log CFU/mL (CW-6), it gradually recovered and returned to 4.97 log CFU/mL (CW-25).

3.5 PCA and correlation analysis

PCA was performed on rumen fermentation parameters and microbial concentrations in vitro to extract the first two principal components (PC₁ and PC₂), which explained a cumulative variance of 70.7% (PC₁: 55.92%, PC₂: 14.78%). The results are shown in Figure 2. The distribution of samples in PC₁ and PC₂ spaces showed that each treatment group was significantly separated from Con, indicating that CW has a significant impact on rumen fermentation and microbial community structure, while the boundaries of each treatment with the doses of 4–10 g/kg of CW were unclear. In addition, when the dose of CW was less than 10 g/kg, as the dose increased, the sample gradually moved upward along PC₂. When the dose of CW was greater than 6 g/kg, the sample gradually moved to the left along the PC₁ axis as the dose increased. PCA revealed a dose-dependent segregation pattern: PC₂ predominantly captured the gradational response to lower doses of CW (≤6 g/kg). In contrast, PC₁ strongly correlated with higher doses of CW (>6 g/kg).

Figure 2

Figure 3 shows the Pearson correlation coefficients among multiple variables, with orange indicating a positive correlation and blue indicating a negative correlation. The darker the color, the stronger the linear relationship between the variables. There was a significant positive correlation between DM degradation rate and NDF degradation rate (R² = 0.8685) and cellulose degradation rate (R² = 0.6401), while there was also a significant positive correlation between NDF degradation rate and hemicellulose degradation rate (R² = 0.7528). MCP was significantly positively correlated with the hemicellulose degradation rate (R² = 0.6295) and bacterial relative concentration (R² = 0.8383). The relative concentration of bacteria was significantly and positively correlated with the hemicellulose degradation rate (R² = 0.7584). NH₃–N was negatively correlated with MCP (R² = −0.5660). MCP was negatively correlated with total gas production (R² = −0.5583).

Figure 3

4 Discussion

During in-vitro rumen fermentation, different supplementation levels of CW had a significant impact on in-vitro rumen fermentation. The pH was approximately 6.2 in all treatments, with no significant difference compared with Con. The results were at the lowest level of the normal pH range (6.2–7.1) recommended by Ørskov and McDonald (1979). The lower pH in all treatment groups might be mainly related to the feed composition. Higher levels of easily degradable carbohydrates can promote the production of VFAs and CO₂, which can cause a rapid decrease in pH (Dijkstra et al., 2012). In this study, the VFAs and TGP were the lowest at 4–6 g/kg CW, and there was a trend of increasing pH value, but it was not significant. NH₃–N and MCP are corresponding indicators. NH₃–N is an important product of rumen digestion and metabolism and is also the raw material for most microorganisms to synthesize MCP (Zeng et al., 2021). MCP is a product of feed fermentation in the rumen and an important source of protein for ruminants. NH₃–N as a nitrogen source and VFAs as an energy source participate in microbial protein synthesis (Abdillah et al., 2024). The concentration of MCP reflects the population of microorganisms and their ability to utilize NH₃–N. A previous study has shown that adding curcumin can increase the content of microbial proteins, and 300 mg/kg of curcumin could better convert nitrogen in the diet into microbial proteins (Tian et al., 2023). In this study, NH₃–N decreased and then increased with increasing dose of CW, whereas MCP initially increased and then decreased with increasing dose. NH₃–N and MCP were inversely proportional to the supplementation level. CW contains a large amount of flavonoids and phenylpropanoids, which usually increase the synthesis of MCP and reduce the production of NH₃–N in the rumen (Abdillah et al., 2024). Flavonoids (e.g., tannins) enhanced glutamine synthetase and glutamate dehydrogenase activity in fiber-degrading bacteria, facilitating NH₃–N assimilation into microbial amino acids and thereby stimulating microbial protein synthesis (Li et al., 2022b). Phenylpropanoid compounds (e.g., ferulic acid) suppressed deaminase activity in rumen microorganisms, which attenuated amino acid degradation into ammonia. This reduction in NH₃–N concentration optimized nitrogen metabolic pathways and improved nitrogen utilization efficiency (de Paula et al., 2016). VFAs in the rumen are the main source of energy for ruminants, and their content and composition can directly reflect rumen metabolic activity (Manlapig et al., 2024). In this study, AA, BA, and VFA levels showed a U-shaped trend with the increased dose of CW, while the change in PA was not significant, resulting in fermentation transforming to the mode of PA when the doses of CW were 4–6 g/kg. AA and BA are natural substrates of archaea, whereas PA is mainly produced in the ruminant stomach through the succinic and acrylic acid pathways. AA and BA, accompanied by the production of H₂, can be used by archaea for the formation of CH₄, and there is a positive correlation between CH₄ and the ratio of AA to PA. Previous studies have shown that adding red seaweed extract, which contains flavonoids and polyphenolic compounds, accelerates PA production and reduces VFA content and CH₄ production (Choi et al., 2022). This may explain the significant decrease in TGP when adding CW 4–6 g/kg in this study. Similar conclusions were obtained by adding Macleaya cordata (Zeng et al., 2021) and red osier dogwood (Gomaa et al., 2024) extracts to the feed. An increase in PA reduces H₂ levels, thereby reducing the production of methane (Zhang et al., 2020).

The degradation rate of feed reflects the strength of microbial fermentation and decomposition ability. The higher the digestion rate, the better the microbial fermentation and the higher the utilization efficiency of the feed nutrients. In previous studies, the low doses of M. cordata extract (<0.21%) showed no significant change in DM digestion rate, whereas the high doses (>0.31%) resulted in a decrease in DM digestion rate (Zeng et al., 2021). In a study on the supplementation levels of honeysuckle extract to the diet, a high concentration level also resulted in a decreasing trend in the DM degradation rate (Yejun et al., 2019). This study obtained similar results, showing an inverted U-shaped trend of degradation rates for various nutrients. When the dose of CW exceeded 14 g/kg, the degradation rate was lower than that of the Con, indicating that high doses of CW may inhibit microbial fermentation. In addition, the increase in the DM degradation rate may have mainly resulted from the increase in the hemicellulose degradation rate, as demonstrated in the correlation analysis.

The rumen is a unique digestive organ in ruminants that houses a large number of bacteria, fungi, archaea, and protozoa, which play crucial roles in the health and growth performance of the host. Bacteria affect the feed efficiency of ruminants, and fermentation substrates affect the abundance and diversity of rumen microorganisms (Min et al., 2024). The functional components of CW could affect the rumen microbiota (Lemos et al., 2021). In this study, as the dose of CW increased, the relative concentration of bacteria showed an inverted U-shaped trend. This result was consistent with the changes in the nutrient degradation rate and the results of the correlation analysis. Bacteria, as the dominant population, mainly ferment complex carbohydrates such as cellulose and hemicellulose (Liu et al., 2024b). Fungi account for approximately 10%–20% of the total rumen microbiota (Huws et al., 2018). Rumen fungi are closely related to archaea (Li et al., 2024). Fungi offered physical support and contact points for archaea, enabling the latter to metabolize using fungal decomposition products. By decomposing cellulose, fungi supplied carbon sources to archaea, which in turn convert these into methane and volatile fatty acids (Li et al., 2024). As the dose of CW increased in this study, both fungi and archaea showed a decreasing trend, which might be the reason for the decrease in TGP. Protozoa coexisted in a symbiotic relationship with methanogens, while they did not directly synthesize methane, and they could indirectly influence methane production through their interactions with archaea. During their metabolic processes, protozoa fermented carbohydrates and various organic materials to yield hydrogen and formate, serving as crucial precursors for methanogenic archaea to produce methane (Hegarty, 1990). Flavonoids and phenylpropanoid compounds could reduce the number of protozoa in the rumen by 25%–49% (Kim et al., 2013), thereby reducing methane production. However, when the dose of CW exceeded 14 g/kg, both TGP and the number of protozoa showed an upward trend. This may be because the high dose of CW exerts pharmacological effects and leads to abnormal fermentation. High-dose flavonoids impair cellulose degradation efficiency and nitrogen utilization by restructuring the rumen microbial community. This is characterized by a marked increase in Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria abundance alongside a reduction in Firmicutes and Fibrobacteres abundance. These microbial shifts drove an elevation in VFAs’ concentrations and redirected the pathways of methane production, as well as the allocation of energy within the rumen ecosystem. Simultaneously, flavonoids suppress cellulase activity, thereby diminishing fiber degradation capacity and microbial protein synthesis efficiency (Yu et al., 2023; Rabee et al., 2024).

Overall, based on the analysis of various indicators and PCA, when the dose of CW was low, it promoted fermentation, whereas when the dose was high, it exerted an inhibitory effect on fermentation. However, in-vitro systems lack host-immune feedback and anaerobic stability, and further in-vivo digestion and metabolism experiments are needed.

In conclusion, adding CW significantly affected in-vitro rumen fermentation in sheep and displayed a biphasic action: When the dose was increased to 4–6 g/kg, notable enhancements were observed in the MCP and the relative abundance of total bacteria, suggesting an improvement in the fermentation status and nitrogen utilization efficiency; as the dose continued to escalate, the significance of the difference progressively diminished until a dose of 10 g/kg was reached, at which point there was no notable disparity in the fermentation status compared to the control; when the dose surpassed 14 g/kg, the decline in the nutrient degradation rate, accompanied by an increase in NH₃–N and total gas production, signaled abnormal alterations in the fermentation process and microbial balance. The optimal supplementation range was established as 4–6 g/kg, albeit with certain inherent constraints. Future in-vivo research should delve into the impact of the extract on rumen microbiota and metabolites. Additionally, taking into account factors like host immune response and anaerobic stability will further ascertain the appropriate dosage for inclusion.

References

• 1

  AbdillahA. E.SarahD.ArdianA. A.AnasM. A.ApriantoM. A.HanimC.et al. (2024). Effect of nutmeg essential oil (Myristica fragrans Houtt.) on methane production, rumen fermentation, and nutrient digestibility in vitro. Sci. Rep.14, 3554. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52532-3

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 2

  AntoniusA.PazlaR.Masdia PutriE.Ichsan Alma’IM.Budiarti LaconiE.DiapariD.et al. (2024). Effects of herbal plant supplementation on rumen fermentation profiles and protozoan population in vitro. Vet. World17, 1139. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2024.1139-1148

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 3

  BakerG.SmithJ.CowanD. (2004). Review and re-analysis of domain-specific 16s primers. J. Microbiol. Meth.55, 541–555. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2003.08.009

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 4

  CaporasoJ.LauberC.WaltersW.Berg-LyonsD.LozuponeC.TurnbaughP.et al. (2011). Global patterns of 16s Rrna diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. PNAS108, 4516–4522. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000080107

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 5

  Castro-MontoyaJ.De CampeneereS.Van RanstG.FievezV. (2012). Interactions between methane mitigation additives and basal substrates on in vitro methane and VFA production. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech.176, 47–60. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.07.007

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 6

  ChengG.HaoH.XieS.WangX.DaiM.HuangL.et al. (2014). Antibiotic alternatives: the substitution of antibiotics in animal husbandry? Front. Microbiol.5. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00217

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 7

  ChoiY.LeeS. J.KimH. S.EomJ. S.JoS. U.GuanL. L.et al. (2022). Red seaweed extracts reduce methane production by altering rumen fermentation and microbial composition in vitro. Front. Vet. Sci.9. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.985824

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 8

  CouncilN. (2007). Nutrient requirements of small ruminants (Washington: National Academies Press).

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 9

  DenmanS. E.McSweeneyC. S. (2006). Development of a real-time PCR assay for monitoring anaerobic fungal and cellulolytic bacterial populations within the rumen. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.58, 572–582. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00190.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 10

  de PaulaE.SamensariR.MaChadoE.PereiraL.MaiaF.YoshimuraE.et al. (2016). Effects of phenolic compounds on ruminal protozoa population, ruminal fermentation, and digestion in water buffaloes. Livest. Sci.185, 136–141. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2016.01.021

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 11

  DijkstraJ.EllisJ. L.KebreabE.StratheA. B.LópezS.FranceJ.et al. (2012). Ruminal pH regulation and nutritional consequences of low pH. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech.172, 22–33. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.12.005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 12

  DingX.JinF.XuJ.ZhangS.ChenD.HuB.et al. (2022). The impact of aquaculture system on the microbiome and gut metabolome of juvenile Chinese softshell turtle (Pelodiscus sinensis). iMeta1, 24. doi: 10.1002/imt2.17

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 13

  DuanP.RehemujiangH.ZhangL.LuM.LiC.HuL.et al. (2024). Lycium barbarum (wolfberry) branches and leaves enhance the growth performance and improve the rumen microbiota in Hu sheep. Animals14, 1610. doi: 10.3390/ani14111610

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 14

  FaniyiT. O.AdewumiM.ÊnioR.PratesE. R.AyansinaS.AyangbenroA. S. (2016). Publicações em medicina veterinária e zootecni a effect of herbs and spices (plant extracts) on rumen microbial activities: a review. Pubvet10, 477–486. doi: 10.22256/pubvet.v10n6.477-486

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 15

  GardesM.BrunsT. (2010). Its primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes–application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol. Ecol.2, 113–118. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.1993.tb00005.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 16

  GillM. S. A.SaleemH.AhemadN. (2020). Plant extracts and their secondary metabolites as modulators of kinases. Curr. Top. Med. Chem.20, 1093–1104. doi: 10.2174/1568026620666200224100219

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 17

  GomaaW. M. S.SaleemA. M.McGeoughE. J.OminskiK.ChenL. Y.YangW. Z. (2024). Effect of red osier dogwood extract on in vitro gas production, dry matter digestibility, and fermentation characteristics of forage-based diet or grain-based diet. Heliyon10, e27991. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27991

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 18

  GreatheadH. (2003). Plants and plant extracts for improving animal productivity. P. Nutr. Soc62, 279–290. doi: 10.1079/PNS2002197

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 19

  HegartyR. S. (1990). Reducing rumen methane emissions through elimination of rumen protozoa. Crop Pasture Sci.50, 1321–1328. doi: 10.1071/AR99008

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 20

  HorwitzW. (2006). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International (Maryland: AOAC International Publishing).

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 21

  HuwsS. A.CreeveyC. J.OyamaL. B.MizrahiI.DenmanS. E.PopovaM.et al. (2018). Addressing global ruminant agricultural challenges through understanding the rumen microbiome: past, present, and future. Front. Microbiol.9. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02161

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 22

  KimE.MinK.KimC.MoonY.KimS.LeeC. (2013). The effect of plant extracts on in-vitro ruminal fermentation, methanogenesis and methane-related microbes in the rumen. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci.26 (4), 517–522. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2012.12480

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 23

  LemosB. J. M.SouzaF. M.ArnholdE.ConceiçãoE. C.CoutoV. R. M.FernandesJ. J. R. (2021). Effects of plant extracts from Stryphnodendron adstringens (mart.) coville, Lafoensia pacari a. st.-hil, copaifera spp., and Pterodon emarginatus Vogel on in vitro rumen fermentation. J. Anim. Physiol. An. N.105, 639–652. doi: 10.1111/jpn.13502

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 24

  LiL.BaoB.ChaiX.ChenX.SuX.FengS.et al. (2022a). The anti-inflammatory effect of callicarpa nudiflora extract on h. pylori-infected ges-1 cells through the inhibition of Ros/Nlrp3/Caspase-1/Il-1β signaling axis. Can. J. Infect. Dis. Med., 5469236. doi: 10.1155/2022/5469236

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 25

  LiK.DuH.GuoW.NaM.NaR. (2024). Alfalfa supplementation timing changes the rumen archaeal and fungal community composition and colonization in pre-weaning lambs. Front. Microbiol.15. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1380322

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 26

  LiM.HassanF.PengL.XieH.LiangX.HuangJ.et al. (2022b). Mulberry flavonoids modulate rumen bacteria to alter fermentation kinetics in water buffalo. PeerJ14, e14309. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14309

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 27

  LinX.ChenG.JiangZ.XingY.LiuY. (2024). New terpenoids from Callicarpa nudiflora and their chemotaxonomic significance. Biochem. Syst. Ecol.116, 104872. doi: 10.1016/j.bse.2024.104872

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 28

  LiuM.HuangG.LinY.HuangY.XuanZ.LunJ.et al. (2024a). Effects of dietary Callicarpa nudiflora aqueous extract supplementation on growth performance, growth hormone, antioxidant and immune function, and intestinal health of broilers. Antioxidants13, 572. doi: 10.3390/antiox13050572

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 29

  LiuS.ZhengN.WangJ.ZhaoS. (2024b). Relationships among bacterial cell size, diversity, and taxonomy in rumen. Front. Microbiol.15. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1376994

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 30

  LivakK. J.SchmittgenT. D. (2002). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR. Methods25, 402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 31

  MaY.GuoL.HouW.ZhuoJ.ZhaoM.LiuY. (2022). Phytochemistry, bioactivities, and future prospects of Callicarpa nudiflora: A review. Medicinal Plant Biol.1, 1–14. doi: 10.48130/MPB-2022-0005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 32

  MaW.MaL.YiB.ZhangM.FengS.TianL. (2019). Antidiabetic activity of Callicarpa nudiflora extract in type 2 diabetic rats via activation of the ampk-acc pathway. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Bio.9, 456–466. doi: 10.4103/2221-1691.270978

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 33

  MakkarH. P. S.SharmaO. P.DawraR. K.NegiS. S. (1982). Simple determination of microbial protein in rumen liquor. J. Dairy Sci.65, 2170–2173. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(82)82477-6

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 34

  ManlapigJ. J. D.KawakamiS.MatamuraT. M. H. (2024). Effect of rice bran extract on in vitro rumen fermentation and methane production. Anim. Sci. J.95, e13923. doi: 10.1111/asj.13923

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 35

  MenkeK. H.RaabL.SalewskiA.SteingassH.SchneiderW. (1979). The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedingstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro. J. Agr. Sci.93, 217–222. doi: 10.1017/S0021859600086305

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 36

  MinB. R.WeiW.PittaD. W.NagarajuI.PatraA. K.HeW. H.et al. (2024). Characterization of the ruminal microbiota in sheep and goats fed different levels of tannin-rich sericea lespedeza hay. J. Anim. Sci.2024, skae198. doi: 10.1093/jas/skae198

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 37

  MthiyaneF. T.DludlaP.ZiqubuK.MthembuS.MuvhulawaN.HlengwaN.et al. (2023). Corrigendum: a review on the antidiabetic properties of moringa oleifera extracts: focusing on oxidative stress and inflammation as main therapeutic targets. Front. Pharmacol.14. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1142410

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 38

  MurrayM. G.ThompsonW. F. (1980). Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res.8, 4321–4326. doi: 10.1093/nar/8.19.4321

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 39

  NanonA.SuksombatW.YangW. (2014). Effects of essential oils supplementation on in vitro and in situ feed digestion in beef cattle. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech.196, 50–59. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.07.006

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 40

  NongK.QinX.LiuZ.WangZ.WuY.ZhangB.et al. (2024). Potential effects and mechanism of flavonoids extract of Callicarpa nudiflora hook on dss-induced colitis in mice. Phytomedicine128, 155523. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2024.155523

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 41

  ØrskovE. R.McDonaldI. (1979). The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. J. Agr. Sci.92, 499–503. doi: 10.1017/S0021859600063048

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 42

  PrestonT. R. (1998). “Tropical animal feeding: a manual for research workers,” in Animal Production and Health (Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome).

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 43

  RabeeA.GhandourM.SallamA.ElwakeelE.MohammedR.SabraE.et al. (2024). Rumen fermentation and microbiota in Shami goats fed on condensed tannins or herbal mixture. BMC Vet. Res.20, 35. doi: 10.1186/s12917-024-03887-2

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 44

  TheodorouM.WilliamsB.DhanoaM.McAllanA.FranceJ. (1994). A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech.48, 185–197. doi: 10.1016/0377-8401(94)90171-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 45

  TianG.ZhangX.HaoX.ZhangJ. (2023). Effects of curcumin on growth performance, ruminal fermentation, rumen microbial protein synthesis, and serum antioxidant capacity in housed growing lambs. Animals13, 1439. doi: 10.3390/ani13091439

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 46

  van SoestP. J.RobertsonJ. B.LewisB. A. (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci.74, 3583–3597. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 47

  VeraN.Gutiérrez-GómezC.WilliamsP.AllendeR.FuentealbaC.Ávila-StagnoJ. (2022). Comparing the effects of a pine (Pinus radiata D. Don) bark extract with a quebracho (Schinopsis balansae Engl.) extract on methane production and in vitro rumen fermentation parameters. Animals12, 1080. doi: 10.3390/ani12091080

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 48

  VijayaraghavanK.AshokkumarT. (2017). Plant-mediated biosynthesis of metallic nanoparticles: A review of literature, factors affecting synthesis, characterization techniques and applications. J. Environ. Chem. Eng.5, 4866–4883. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2017.09.026

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 49

  YagiS.NilofarN.UbaA. I.CaprioliG.MustafaA. M.AngeloniS.et al. (2024). Elucidating the chemical profile and biological studies of Verbascum diversifolium Hochst. extracts. Front. Pharmacol.15. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1333865

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 50

  YejunL.Su KyoungL.Shin JaL.Jong-SuE.Sung SillL. (2019). Effects of Lonicera japonica extract supplementation on in vitro ruminal fermentation, methane emission, and microbial population. Anim. Sci. J.90, 1170–1176. doi: 10.1111/asj.13259

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 51

  YeshiK.RuscherR.MilesK.CraynD.LiddellM.WangchukP. (2022). Antioxidant and anti-Inflammatory activities of endemic plants of the Australian Wet Tropics. Plants11, 2519. doi: 10.3390/plants11192519

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 52

  YuS.LiL.ZhaoH.LiuM.JiangL.ZhaoY. (2023). Citrus flavonoid extracts alter the profiling of rumen antibiotic resistance genes and virulence factors of dairy cows. Front. Microbiol.14. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1201262

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 53

  ZengZ.ShengP.ZhangH.HeL.HuangJ.WangD.et al. (2021). The effect of Macleaya cordata extract on in vitro ruminal fermentation and methanogenesis. Food Sci. Nutr.9, 4561–4567. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.2436

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 54

  ZhangH.TongJ.WangZ.XiongB.JiangL. (2020). Illumina MiSeq sequencing reveals the effects of grape seed procyanidin on rumen archaeal communities in vitro. Anim. Biosci.33, 61–68. doi: 10.5713/ajas.19.0226

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 55

  ZhouJ.BrunsM.TiedjeJ. (1996). DNA recovery from soils of diverse composition. Appl. Environ. Microb.62, 316–322. doi: 10.1002/bit.260490302

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 56

  ZhuangR. (2018). Some Pharmacodynamics, Toxicology and Clinical Effects of Callicarpa nudiflora Power. Master’s thesis (Guangzhou: South China Agricultural University).

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article