ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Anim. Sci.
Sec. Animal Nutrition
Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fanim.2025.1609709
Effects of an activated carbon and four different biochars on fermentation in the artificial rumen (RUSITEC)
Provisionally accepted- 1Institute of Animal Nutrition, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany
- 2Clinic for Cattle, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany
- 3Institute for Biometry, Epidemiology and Information Processing, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany
- 4International Research Association for Feed Technology e.V., Brunswick, Niedersachsen, Germany
- 5German Institute of Food Technologies, Quakenbrück, Lower Saxony, Germany
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The anthropogenic climate change is primarily caused by CO2 and CH4 emissions, with a significant portion originating from agriculture and livestock. Reducing methane emissions in ruminant husbandry has been a longstanding goal. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to influence the fermentation processes in the artificial rumen model (Rumen Simulation Technique, RUSITEC) using five different carbons, one activated carbon (AC), four biochars (BC) and one control without supplement. . The carbons were included at 2% of dry matter (DM) of the basal diet, which corresponded to 0.3 g DM of the assigned additive. The treatments were conducted on 12 fermenters with two replications (n=4/treatment) in a randomized block design. The experimental period consisted of a seven-day adaptation phase and an eight-day data and sample collection phase. Parameters included gas volume, gas composition, disappearance rates, volatile fatty acid (VFA) production, and nutrient digestion. Except for biochar (BC) 3, carbons showed no impact on gas parameters, while BC 3 decreased CO2 production (p=0.0453), gas volume (p=0.0255), and the ratio of CO2 (p=0.0304), CH4 (p=0.0304), and gas volume (p=0.0304) to disappeared organic matter (dOM). BC 3 also showed a tendency to decrease in methane production (p=0.0878). Effects on produced VFA were only found for BC 3, that reduced the daily production of total VFA (p=0.0226), acetic acid (p=0.0248), propionic acid (p=0.0166), i-butyric acid (p=0.0366), and the ratio of VFA to dry matter loss (p=0.0172), and to dOM (p=0.0304), while pH (p=0.0309) was higher compared to the control. Only BC 3 had decreasing effects on disappearance rates (p=0.0304). Although BC 3 reduces greenhouse gas emissions, it does so at the expense of fermentation, as indicated by its decreasing impact on digestion rate, VFA production, and the resulting increase in pH. In conclusion, biochar has the potential to effect rumen fermentation in vitro. However, hat formatiert: Englisch (Vereinigte Staaten) general statements regarding the effects of biochars on fermentation cannot be derived from this experiment; each biochar source needs to be evaluated individually.
Keywords: greenhouse gases, Fermentation, RUSITEC, biochar, Methan reduction
Received: 10 Apr 2025; Accepted: 03 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Weinberg, Hoeltershinken, Rohn, Hancock, Witte, Sitzmann, Terjung, Schubert and Visscher. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Alexander Weinberg, Institute of Animal Nutrition, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.