Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Anim. Sci.

Sec. Animal Physiology and Management

Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fanim.2025.1648573

An index for the estimation of chicken adaptability to free-range farming systems of different slow-growing genotypes

Provisionally accepted
Simona  MattioliSimona Mattioli1,2*Laura  MenchettiLaura Menchetti3Elisa  AngelucciElisa Angelucci2Alice  Cartoni MancinelliAlice Cartoni Mancinelli2Alessandro  Dal BoscoAlessandro Dal Bosco2Laura  MadeoLaura Madeo4Francesca  Di FedericoFrancesca Di Federico2Luigia  BosaLuigia Bosa2Livia  MoscatiLivia Moscati4Cesare  CastelliniCesare Castellini2
  • 1University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
  • 2Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Science, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
  • 3School of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, camerino, Italy
  • 4Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Umbria e delle Marche Togo Rosati, Perugia, Italy

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Estimation of chicken adaptability to extensive rearing system (ERS) is a complex issue, many aspects should be considered: natural and/or welfare-based behaviours, kinetic and foraging attitude, resistance to environmental changes (i.e., thermotolerance) and to the disease. However, it is necessary to find a rapid and straightforward way to define the degree of adaptation of a chicken genotype in a commercial farm context. With this purpose, the objective of the present research was to develop an index of adaptability constituted by few and simple traits. Two-hundred chickens of four different slow-growing genotypes (SGs; 25 chickens x 2 replicates x genotype) were outdoor reared: Red JA57 (RJ), Naked Neck (NN), Lohmann Dual meat-type (LD), and an Italian Crossbreed (Robusta Maculata x Sassò, CB). Behavioural observations were recorded 2 times/week on outdoor pens from 36 to 81 days, whereas plumage condition, hock burns, footpad dermatitis, blood parameters, proximate composition and technological traits of breast and drumstick meat were recorded at slaughtering age (81 days) from 15/chickens genotype. On-farm productive performance were recorded weekly. The almost 200 variables collected were classified into four pillars (i.e., behaviours, body conditions, meat quality, in vivo health) and reduced into 9 main variables by using Discriminant (DA) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA). The Index score was calculated as the sum of the variables weighted by the loading obtained in the final PCA. Finally, the Cronbach's alpha test was used to measure the internal consistency and reliability of the index. The present investigation demonstrated that measuring only 9 traits (breast malondialdehyde, breast yield and live weight, allo-grooming, resting and running behaviours, n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), and saturated fatty acids (SFA) of drumstick, blood PUFA, Heterophile/Lymphocyte ratio) of different pillars could be an efficient, rapid, and economical strategy to assess the adaptability of a chicken genotypes to ERS. The final classification showed that CB and LD genotypes had the worst indices, whereas NN and RJ showed the best ones. However, it is necessary verify the reliability of the present approach in different rearing conditions and with other genetic strains.

Keywords: Adaptability, index, Oxidation, slow growing genotypes, welfare

Received: 17 Jun 2025; Accepted: 21 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Mattioli, Menchetti, Angelucci, Cartoni Mancinelli, Dal Bosco, Madeo, Di Federico, Bosa, Moscati and Castellini. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Simona Mattioli, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.