ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Anim. Sci.
Sec. Animal Nutrition
Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fanim.2025.1666818
Assessment of additive used to formulate molasses lick blocks to reduce beef cattle methane emissions
Provisionally accepted- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Methane (CH₄) emissions from ruminants significantly contribute to agricultural greenhouse gases. Strategies to reduce these emissions without compromising productivity are urgently needed. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a novel product incorporated into molasses lick blocks and grain-based pellets to reduce methane emissions and improve productivity in grazing beef cattle. Four products were screened in vitro for their efficacy in reducing methane production. The most effective (Product 3) was then incorporated into grain-based pellets and offered to steers via GreenFeed units at target intakes of 0, 100, and 200 g/head per day. Dry matter intake (DMI), CH4 production, methane yield (g CH₄/kg DMI), methane intensity, water intake, and average daily gain (ADG) were measured. Product 3 reduced in vitro methane production by over 90% at a 6% inclusion rate (P < 0.05). In vivo, steers supplemented with product-containing pellets tended (P = 0.07) to reduce CH₄ production by 10.7% compared to the control. Methane yield was reduced (P < 0.01) by 11.7% and 7.5% for the 100 and 200 g/day supplementation levels, respectively. Methane intensity tended (P = 0.06) to be 16.8% lower in supplemented groups. Product intake was negatively correlated with CH₄ yield and intensity and positively associated with water intake and ADG (P < 0.05). The inclusion of Product 3 in supplements for grazing beef cattle significantly reduced methane yield and tended to reduce methane production and intensity, without negatively impacting performance. Product 3 shows potential as a viable methane mitigation strategy for grazing systems. However, further research is needed to assess the long-term effects and potential microbial adaptation associated with higher or prolonged dosing.
Keywords: Enteric methane, greenhouse gas, Lick blocks, Cattle, Molasses
Received: 15 Jul 2025; Accepted: 16 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Nikoloric, Simanungkalit, Possell, Gonzalez and V Chaves. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Alex V Chaves, alex.chaves@sydney.edu.au
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.