ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Anim. Sci.
Sec. Animal Nutrition
This article is part of the Research TopicQuantifying and Mitigating Pollution from Livestock Production SystemsView all 8 articles
Seasons, herd mobility and management drive feed intake and digestibility in grazing cattle in West African landscapes
Provisionally accepted- 1Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Montpellier, France
- 2CIRAD Departement Environnements et Societes, Montpellier, France
- 3pastoc, Caylus, France
- 4Centre wallon de Recherches agronomiques, Gembloux, Belgium
- 5ISRA-LNERV, DAKAR, Senegal
- 6Meteo France, Saint-Mandé, France
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Estimating the daily diet of grazing cattle from available feed resources in pastoral and mixed crop-livestock systems in tropical West Africa remains a challenge. The objective of this study was to describe the relevance of cattle diet monitoring across the seasons to better assess the livestock-resources interactions in its local environment in the region. We analyzed seasonal profiles of the diet of grazing cattle in five sites distributed along the Sudano-Sahelian climate gradient from an arid to a sub-humid bioclimate. In the five sites (ranked from the driest to the wettest: Widou, Dahra, Niakhar, Koumbia, Kolda), the feeding behavior of grazing cattle was monitored and feces were collected monthly for one year to estimate dietary intake and digestibility. All the conserved dry samples (n = 1,186) underwent near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) analyses. The resulting spectral data were compared with a large set of spectral reference data (n=4,138) to predict dry matter intake (DMvi_Fnir DM; g.kgMW-1) and digestibility (dMO_Fnir,%OM) using an updated NIRS "local calibration" procedure. Daily fodder intake ranged from 38.90±6.35 in the hot dry season to 83.86±8.73 gDM.kgMW-1.d-1 in the late wet season. Estimated diet organic matter digestibility ranged from 53.6±8.51% in the hot dry season to 74.3±3.52% in the early wet season. Estimated by aggregation, the total annual intake of a tropical livestock unit (TLU, i.e. a standard 250 kg live weight animal) ranged from 1,236 ± 255 kgDM.TLU-1.year-1 in Dahra to 1,560±142 kgDM.TLU-1.year-1 in Widou. This was well below the 2,281 Kg.DM annual estimate derived from a standard intake of 2.5% LW in DM. Taking digestibility into account, the summed annual metabolizable energy (ME) intake values ranged from 9,858 ± 2,077 Mj.TLU-1.year-1 in Dahra to 13,929 ± 2,345 Mj.TLU-1.year-1 in Koumbia. While important gaps appear during the dry season in some locations, this covered the annual basal maintenance requirements of a TLU, which, based on international standards, are estimated at 7,819 Mj.TLU-1.year-1 (21.4 Mj.day-1). This leaves ME at varying extend, to cover the needs for growth, milk production and reproduction.
Keywords: fecal NIRS, Grazing cattle, Pastoral and agro-pastoral systems, Intake, Diet digestibility, Sudano-Sahelian zone, Tropical West Africa
Received: 07 Aug 2025; Accepted: 06 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Assouma, LECOMTE, Hiernaux, Ickowicz, Decruyenaere, Blanchard, WADE, Bois, Corniaux, Guichard and Vayssières. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Habibou Mohamed Assouma, habibou.assouma@cirad.fr
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
