Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Anim. Sci.

Sec. Precision Livestock Farming

Biologically Informed Algorithms for Modeling Cattle Response to Auditory Cues and Driving Simulations in Virtual Fencing Systems

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Cornell University Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Ithaca, United States
  • 2Cornell University College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Ithaca, United States
  • 3Cornell University School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Ithaca, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Virtual fencing technologies offer a promising alternative to traditional physical barriers for managing livestock, enabling dynamic and non-invasive control over grazing behavior. However, current systems often rely on simplified assumptions about animal responses, neglecting the cognitive, perceptual, and social dynamics that shape cattle behavior in complex herd environments. This study introduces a biologically grounded modeling framework designed to capture core processes influencing cattle response to auditory cues—specifically frequency sensitivity, amplitude saturation, associative learning, habituation, individual behavioral variability, and social influence. These factors are formalized through modular equations; and integrated into agent-based and differential equation simulations to examine individual and herd-level outcomes. By calibrating the model against empirical behavioral data, we reproduce known learning patterns and explore cue effectiveness under variable conditions. The framework offers an interpretable and flexible foundation for optimizing next-generation virtual fencing systems, improving both functional control and animal welfare.

Keywords: Virtual fencing, cattle behavior, herd dynamics, agent-based modelling, Learning andHabituation

Received: 18 Sep 2025; Accepted: 18 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 James, Perez, Adams, Giordano, Peck and Erickson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: David Erickson, de54@cornell.edu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.