ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Anim. Sci.
Sec. Animal Nutrition
Milk yield and composition of dairy sheep grazing teff or sorghum-sudangrass under Mediterranean summer conditions
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, University of Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy
- 2Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale Lazio e Toscana “Mariano Aleandri”, National Reference Centre for Ovine and Caprine Milk and Dairy Products Quality (C.Re.L.D.O.C.), Rome, Italy
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Summer forage scarcity is a major constraint for Mediterranean dairy sheep farming, where high temperatures and drought reduce pasture yield and quality, leading to strong milk seasonality. Teff (Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter), a C4 annual grass native to Ethiopia, is drought- and heat-tolerant and may represent an alternative to traditional summer forages such as sorghum-sudangrass (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench subsp. sudanense). This study evaluated the effects of grazing teff on milk yield and composition in lactating Sarda ewes compared with sorghum-sudangrass under Mediterranean summer conditions. Thirty-two primiparous ewes in late lactation (150 ± 10 DIM) were assigned to two balanced groups (n = 16) and grazed 4 h/day for six weeks (two adaptation, four experimental) on either teff (GT) or sorghum-sudangrass (GS) pastures, supplemented with ad libitum hay and 0.5 kg/day concentrate. Pasture and milk were sampled weekly for chemical and quality analyses. Teff showed higher dry matter (30.8 vs 22.4%), crude protein (14.8 vs 10.6% DM), and ether extract (2.5 vs 1.9% DM), and lower acid detergent fiber (33.1 vs 37.4% DM) and lignin (4.1 vs 5.6% DM) compared with sorghum-sudangrass (P < 0.01). Ewes grazing teff produced slightly less milk (0.86 ± 0.09 vs 0.93 ± 0.11 kg/day; P < 0.05), with lower fat (6.19 vs 6.68%; P < 0.001) but higher lactose content (5.37 vs 5.28%; P < 0.05). Protein (5.60 vs 5.59%), somatic cell count (<200 × 10³ cells/mL), and coagulation traits were unaffected. Overall, both forages adequately supported lactating ewes during the summer. Teff appears promising for water-limited areas due to its heat and drought tolerance and stable nutritional profile, though its slightly lower voluntary intake may limit milk yield. Further studies addressing palatability and intake behavior are warranted.
Keywords: Grazing management and animal production, Annual grass species, milk yield andcomposition, Summer grazing, Out-of-season production
Received: 21 Sep 2025; Accepted: 29 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Primi, Bernabucci, Evangelista, Boselli, Napoli, Spina, Bernabucci, Ronchi and Danieli. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Riccardo Primi, primi@unitus.it
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
