ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Anim. Sci.
Sec. Precision Livestock Farming
Beyond the farm: stakeholder perspectives on precision livestock farming in the swine industry
Provisionally accepted
- 1Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States
- 2Scotland's Rural College, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
This study explores the Precision Livestock Farming (PLF) technology perceptions and data needs of off-farm swine industry stakeholders. The aim was to increase our understanding of PLF's real-world applicability beyond farm operations. Using focus group discussions, five professionals— spanning government official, animal scientists, food processors, and retail representatives— offered insights on ideal data types and practical concerns associated with PLF adoption. Using the Nominal Group Technique (NGT), we determined that participants have unique data needs, with no clear consensus on data priorities for PLF. We conducted a second focus group following normal focus group protocols, allowing us to further explore participants' PLF priorities, nuanced perspectives, and shared beliefs. We identified five themes: "To Split the Check or Not to Split the Check; Knowing the Benefits is Key; Reconciling Profit and Welfare in PLF; What Use is PLF to the Animal Anyway? and The Value and Caveats of PLF Data. The benefits of PLF data to participants were closely tied to clear cost-sharing structures, meaningful benefits for diverse stakeholders, and assurances about data control. Stakeholders voiced concerns around financial feasibility, ethical implications, and practical barriers in terms of data management. Overall, addressing these complex but interrelated needs and concerns by other stakeholders can make data generated by PLF useful beyond the farm and provide additional incentives to advance PLF adoption in the swine industry. This finding may provide actionable insights to inform strategies that support both the technological advancement and ethical sustainability of PLF in animal agriculture.
Keywords: Agricultural technology, Animal Welfare, data security, Stakeholder perception, Swine industry
Received: 22 Sep 2025; Accepted: 26 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Akinyemi, Jessiman, Turner and Siegford. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Babatope Akinyemi
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.