REVIEW article
Front. Artif. Intell.
Sec. Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence
Volume 8 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1576992
DeepSeek vs ChatGPT: Prospects and Challenges
Provisionally accepted- 1College of Medicine, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, North Gyeongsang, Republic of Korea
- 2Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
- 3New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, United States
- 4Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Schwarzman College of Computing, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
- 5Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
- 6Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
- 7Essen University Hospital, Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
- 8Department of Pathology, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, New York, United States
- 9Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States
- 10University Muenster, Münster, Germany
- 11Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten-Herdecke, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
- 12Langone Medical Center, New York University, New York City, New York, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
DeepSeek has introduced its recent model DeepSeek-R1, showing divergence from OpenAI's ChatGPT, suggesDng an open-source alternaDve to users. This paper analyzes the architecture of DeepSeek-R1, mainly adopDng rule-based reinforcement learning (RL) without preliminary supervised fine-tuning (SFT), which has shown beNer efficiency. By integraDng mulD-stage training along with cold-start data usage before RL, the model can achieve meaningful performance in reasoning tasks along with reward modeling opDmizing training process. DeepSeek shows its strength in technical, reasoning tasks, able to show its decision-making process through open source whereas ChatGPT shows its strength on general tasks and areas requiring creaDveness. Despite the groundbreaking developments of both models, there is room for improvement in AI landscape and maNers to be handled such as quality of data, black box problems, privacy management, and job displacement. This paper suggests the future of AI, expecDng beNer performance in mulD-modal tasks, enhancing its effecDveness in handling larger data sets, enabling users with improved AI landscapes and uDlity.
Keywords: ArDficial intelligence, DeepSeek-R1, reinforcement learning, open-source, ChatGPT
Received: 17 Feb 2025; Accepted: 19 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Jin, Tangsrivimol, Darzi, Hassan Virk, Wang, Egger, Hacking, Glicksberg, Strauss and Krittanawong, MD, FACC. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Markus Strauss, University Muenster, Münster, Germany
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.