ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Artif. Intell.
Sec. Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence
Volume 8 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1582960
This article is part of the Research TopicRobust Machine LearningView all 4 articles
A comparative study of bone density in elderly people measured with AI and QCT
Provisionally accepted- Affliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: First to validate the diagnostic equivalence of AI-based BMD prediction against quantitative CT (QCT) reference standards, Second to assess inter-device measurement consistency across multi-vendor CT systems (Siemens, GE, Philips). Ultimately, the objective is to determine the clinical utility of AI-derived BMD for osteoporosis classification.Methods: In this retrospective multicenter study, paired CT/QCT datasets from 702 patients (2019-2022) were analyzed.The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of an Bone Density AI model were evaluated by comparing the predicted bone mineral density values from bone density AI with the measured values from QCT. Moreover, the consistency of lumbar spine BMD measurements between QCT and Bone Density AI on different devices was compared.Results: The AUC of Bone Density AI model in diagnosing osteoporosis was 0.822 (95% CI: 0.787–0.867, P<0.001), with an accuracy of 0.9456, sensitivity of 0.9601, and specificity of 0.9270, indicating good performance in predicting bone density. The consistency study between Bone Density AI and QCT for the vertebral BMD measurements revealed no statistically significant difference in R² values, suggesting no significant difference in performance between the two methods in measuring BMD. The linear regression fit between the R² values of QCT and Bone Density AI for measuring lumbar spine BMD with different equipment ranged from 0.88 to 0.96, indicating a high degree of consistency between the two measurement methods across devices.Conclusion: This multicenter study pioneers a dual-validation framework to establish the clinical validity of deep learning-based BMD prediction algorithms using routine thoracic/abdominal CT scans. Our data suggest that AI-driven BMD quantification demonstrates non-inferior diagnostic accuracy to QCT while overcoming DXA's accessibility limitations. This technology enables cost-effective, radiation-free osteoporosis screening through routine CT repurposing, particularly beneficial for resource-constrained settings.Keywords: Osteoporosis, Bone Density, Quantitative QCT, Artificial Intelligence( AI)
Keywords: Osteoporosis, Bone Density, Quantitative QCT, Artificial Intelligence( AI), BMD values
Received: 25 Feb 2025; Accepted: 17 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Guo, Zhang, Fu, Liu, Peng, Zhang and Jin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Yingxia Fu, Affliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
Mei Jin, Affliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.