REVIEW article
Front. Artif. Intell.
Sec. Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence
Volume 8 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1608014
This article is part of the Research TopicEmbodied Artificial Intelligence: Advancing the Frontiers of Robot Sensing and InteractionView all articles
Mutual human-robot understanding for a robotenhanced society: the crucial development of shared embodied cognition
Provisionally accepted- Italian Institute of Technology (IIT), Genova, Italy
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The conception of autonomous, intelligent, collaborative robots has been the subject of science fiction rather than science in the second half of the previous century, with practical applications limited to industrial machines without any level of autonomous, intelligent, and collaborative capacity. The new century is facing the challenge of pressing industrial and social revolutions (4, 5, 6, …) with the prospect of infiltrating robots in every sector of human society; however, dissemination will be possible only if acceptable degrees of autonomy, intelligence, and collaborative capacity can be achieved. Scientific and technological innovations are needed within a highly multidisciplinary framework that must ask a fundamental question: does the design of autonomous, intelligent, collaborative robots aim at a unified single template to be mass-produced with functional adaptation of any single prototype, or should the design aim at “baby” robots with a minimal set of sensory-motor-cognitive capabilities as the starting point of a training and educational process in close connection with human companions (masters, partners, final users)? The former alternative is supported by EAI, i.e., the Embodied variant of the Artificial Intelligence family of computational tools based on large foundation models. The latter alternative is bio-inspired; namely, it attempts to replicate the computational structure of Embodied Cognitive Science. Both formulations imply embodiment as a core issue. Still, we think this concept has a markedly different meaning and practical implications in the two cases, although we are still far away from the practical implementations of either roadmap. In this opinion paper, we explain why we think the bio-inspired approach is better than the EAI approach in providing a feasible roadmap for developing autonomous, intelligent, collaborative robots. In particular, we focus on the importance of collaborative human-robot interactions conceived in a general sense, ranging from haptic interactions in joint physical efforts (e.g., loading/unloading) to cognitive interactions for joint strategic planning of complex tasks. We envision this type of collaboration only made possible by a deep human-robot mutual understanding based on a structural equivalence of their embodied cognitive architecture, based on an active, first-person acquisition of experience rather than a passive download of third-person knowledge.
Keywords: Embodied Artificial Intelligence, Embodied cognitive science, enaction theory, Simulation theory of Cognition, developmental psychology, ecological psychology, prospection, Extended mind hypothesis
Received: 08 Apr 2025; Accepted: 23 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Sandini, Sciutti and Morasso. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Pietro Morasso, Italian Institute of Technology (IIT), Genova, 16145, Italy
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.