MINI REVIEW article
Front. Artif. Intell.
Sec. Medicine and Public Health
Volume 8 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1619463
This article is part of the Research TopicEthical and Legal Implications of Artificial Intelligence in Public Health: Balancing Innovation and PrivacyView all 8 articles
Ethical-legal implications of AI-powered healthcare in critical perspective
Provisionally accepted- 1Faculty of Law, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India
- 2NALSAR University of Law, Hyderabad, India
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The increasing utilization of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems in the field of healthcare, from diagnosis to medical decision making and patient care, necessitates identification of its potential benefits, risks and challenges. This requires an appraisal of AI use from a legal and ethical perspectives. A review of the existing literature on AI in healthcare available on PubMed, Oxford Academic and Scopus revealed several common concerns regarding the relationship between AI, ethics, and healthcare—(i) the question of data: the choices inherent in collection, analysis, interpretation, and deployment of data inputted to and outputted by AI systems; (ii) the challenges to traditional patient-doctor relationships and long-held assumptions about privacy, identity and autonomy, as well as to the functioning of healthcare institutions. The potential benefits of AI’s application need to be balanced against the legal-ethical issues emanating from its use—bias, consent, access, privacy and cost—to guard against detrimental effects of uncritical AI use. The authors suggest that a legal framework for AI should adopt a critical and grounded perspective—cognizant of the material political realities of AI and its wider impact on more marginalized communities. The largescale utilization of health datasets often without consent, responsibility or accountability, further necessitates regulation in the field of technology design, given the entwined nature of AI research with advancements in wearables and sensor technology. Taking into account the ‘superhuman’ and ‘subhuman’ traits of AI, regulation should aim to encourage the development of AI systems that augment rather than outright replace human effort.
Keywords: Ai-powered healthcare, AI regulation, Augmented intelligence (AI), Health data, Medical privacy, Law and AI
Received: 28 Apr 2025; Accepted: 17 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Nasir, Siddiqui and Ahmed. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Samreen Ahmed, Faculty of Law, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.