Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

REVIEW article

Front. Artif. Intell.

Sec. Medicine and Public Health

Volume 8 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1649155

This article is part of the Research TopicAI-Driven Scientific Discovery: Transforming Research Across DisciplinesView all articles

AI, Agentic Models and Lab Automation for Scientific Discovery – the beginning of scAInce

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Environmental Health and Engineering, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
  • 2Universitat Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Until recently, the conversation about generative artificial intelligence in science revolved around the textual prowess of large language models such as GPT 3.5 and the promise that they might one day draft a decent literature review. Since then, progress has been nothing short of breathtaking. We now find ourselves in the era of multimodal, agentic systems that listen, see, speak and act, orchestrating cloud software and physical laboratory hardware with a fluency that would have sounded speculative in early 2023. In this review I merge the substance of our 2024 white paper for the World Economic Forum Top-10-Technologies Report with the latest advances through mid 2025, charting a course from automated literature synthesis and hypothesis generation to self driving laboratories, organoid intelligence and climate scale forecasting. The discussion is grounded in emerging governance regimes—notably the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act and ISO 42001—and is written from the dual vantage point of a toxicologist who has spent a career championing robust, humane science and of a field chief editor charged with safeguarding scholarly standards in Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. I argue that research is entering a “co pilot to lab pilot” transition in which AI no longer merely interprets knowledge but increasingly acts upon it. This shift promises dramatic efficiency gains yet simultaneously amplifies concerns about reproducibility, auditability, safety and equitable access.

Keywords: Generative artificial intelligence, Scientific Discovery, Self-driving laboratories, scAInce paradigm, predictive toxicology, Microphysiological systems, AI Governance

Received: 18 Jun 2025; Accepted: 14 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Hartung. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Thomas Hartung, Environmental Health and Engineering, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, 78464, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.