SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Artif. Intell.
Sec. AI in Finance
Volume 8 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1658375
This article is part of the Research TopicImplementing Anti-Financial Crime Risk Control Measures Using Artificial Intelligence: Challenges for Advanced Economies and Emerging MarketsView all 3 articles
Big Data in Financial Risk Management: Evidence, Advances, and Open Questions. A Systematic Review
Provisionally accepted- Department of Management Science and Technology, Panepistemio Patron, Patras, Greece
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The intersection of big data analytics and financial risk management has catalyzed a new era of methodological innovation and organizational transformation. Yet, despite a surge in research activity, the literature remains fragmented, with persistent blind spots in comparative effectiveness, cross-sectoral generalizability, and the operationalization of non-traditional data. This systematic review, grounded in the PRISMA 2020 protocol, synthesizes evidence from 21 studies published between 2016 and June 2025. The analysis maps the comparative strengths and trade-offs of neural networks, ensemble learning, fuzzy logic, and hybrid optimization for managing credit, fraud, systemic, and operational risk. Findings reveal that while advanced machine learning models routinely deliver strong predictive performance, real-world deployment remains uneven, concentrated in Chinese and European banking and fintech, and rarely extending to broader regulatory or sectoral contexts. Integration of alternative and unstructured data, such as IoT signals and behavioral analytics, remains experimental, with substantial technical and governance challenges. Methodological diversity is a hallmark of the field, but systematic benchmarking across risk types and organizational settings is rare, and the imperative for explainability is only beginning to be addressed. This review highlights an urgent need for comparative, cross-jurisdictional research, robust field validation, and open science practices, establishing a critical agenda for bridging the gap between technical advances and operational impact in big data–enabled financial risk management.
Keywords: Systemic Risk, Financial decision-making, Data governance, digital transformation, FinTech
Received: 08 Jul 2025; Accepted: 29 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 THEODORAKOPOULOS, Theodoropoulou and Bakalis. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: LEONIDAS THEODORAKOPOULOS, Department of Management Science and Technology, Panepistemio Patron, Patras, Greece
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.