Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

PERSPECTIVE article

Front. Artif. Intell.

Sec. Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence

Volume 8 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1667752

Breaking the Gatekeepers: How AI Will Revolutionize Scientific Funding

Provisionally accepted
  • University of Nebraska Omaha, Omaha, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

As artificial intelligence (AI) transforms nearly every domain of human endeavor, one of its most consequential impacts may be on science itself. This analysis explores how AI technologies could disrupt the power structures that govern research funding—structures that privilege senior investigators while sidelining early-career scientists and genuinely novel ideas. By juxtaposing the youth-driven innovation behind AI with the increasingly gerontocratic funding patterns in biomedical sciences, we highlight how institutional mechanisms shape not only who gets to do science but also when. Evidence suggests that conventional grant peer review has become a self-reinforcing system—more effective at preserving consensus than fostering discovery. AI presents a compelling alternative: evaluation frameworks that could reduce bias, broaden participation, and open more meritocratic pathways to research independence. The implications extend far beyond individual careers. At stake is society's ability to mobilize scientific creativity against its most urgent challenges. By rethinking outdated practices---especially the gatekeeping role of study sections---and exploring algorithmic approaches to assessment, we may be able to reverse troubling trends and unleash a broader, more diverse wave of discovery. AI will not fix science on its own, but it could help build a system where innovation is no longer an accident of privilege and timing.

Keywords: Peer Review, research evaluation, Early-career scientists, research funding, grant application

Received: 18 Jul 2025; Accepted: 11 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Mangalam. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Madhur Mangalam, University of Nebraska Omaha, Omaha, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.