Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS article

Front. Behav. Econ.

Sec. Culture and Ethics

Volume 4 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frbhe.2025.1610022

This article is part of the Research TopicCapitalism, Conflict, and Cooperation: In Honor of Herbert GintisView all articles

Altruism and Morality: Some Problems for Max U

Provisionally accepted
  • Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

This essay considers some limitations of the assumption of utility maximisation (Max U) as an explanation of human action. Leading promoters of the assumption explicitly avoid the question of motivation, to focus instead on manifest behaviour. Max U is strictly unfalsifiable. With appropriate assumptions and contextual variables, it can be made to fit any real-world behaviour. Max U is neither specifically human nor a product of evolution: it assumes a static set of preferences. Altruism, by definition, is can be costly. This is If those costs result overall in a net disutility, even with a 'warm glow' from helping others, then this is incompatible with the Max U assumption, where no voluntary behaviour reduces utility. Relevant too are criticisms of 'folk psychology', where behaviour is deemed to stem from stable preferences and beliefs. Turning to the question of moral motivation, weWe also need to consider the nature of moral sentiments and how they evolved in cooperative human groups. Overall, an evolutionary perspective enables the development of a richer explanation of human behaviour, including moral motivations, altruism and self-interested pursuits.

Keywords: Utility maximization, evolution, cooperation, Altruism, moral sentiments

Received: 11 Apr 2025; Accepted: 04 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Hodgson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Geoffrey M. Hodgson, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.