Why Science Needs Art

Giulia Ghisleni^1*Christian Stolte²Megan Gozzard³Lea von Soosten⁴Antonia Bruno¹

• ¹University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Biotechnology and Biosciences, Milan, Italy
• ²Christian Stolte Design, Putnam, United States
• ³Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom
• ⁴Universitatsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

This perspective paper examines the profound cognitive and methodological parallels between scientific and artistic research, challenging the traditional distinction between the two domains. While science and art use different languages, both emerge from the human drive for creativity and understanding. We argue that scientific inquiry, often presented as strictly objective and methodical, inherently shares with art the need for imagination, flexibility, and interpretative thinking. Drawing on neuroscience, education, design theory, and the visual arts, we highlight how artistic practices, particularly in the visual arts, can enhance scientific learning, innovation, and public engagement. We advocate for integrating art into scientific training and research to foster a more creative and inclusive epistemology. Through examples in microbiology, education, and data visualization, we show how the arts can support deeper understanding, cross-disciplinary collaboration, and more effective science communication. Ultimately, we call for a shift toward a more integrated approach that embraces the complementary strengths of both art and science in advancing knowledge and societal impact.