Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Bird Sci.

Sec. Science of Birding

This article is part of the Research TopicThe Science of Birding in AfricaView all 3 articles

Large language models enable large-scale analysis of human-bird relationships in South African cities

Provisionally accepted
  • 1University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
  • 2University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Human perceptions of urban wildlife can shape conservation priorities and public support for biodiversity initiatives, however research on human-bird relationships remains spatially biased towards the Global North. Here we assessed the perceptions of 36 urban bird species across four South African urban contexts using a mixed-methods approach. Survey respondents (n = 1,977) rated species likeability on a 5-point Likert scale and provided open-ended explanations for their ratings. Quantitatively, South African urban birds were generally well-liked, with notable variation among species: the Malachite Kingfisher (Corythornis cristatus, mean ± SE = 4.91±0.02) and Orange-breasted Sunbird (Anthobaphes violacea, 4.91±0.02) scored highest, and the Common Myna (Acridotheres tristis, 2.50±0.03) scored lowest. To analyse the approximately 71,000 open-ended responses, we employed ChatGPT, a generative AI large language model, to identify eight themes underlying species appeal. The highest-rated species were primarily valued for aesthetic appeal and emotional connections, while the lowest-rated species were associated with aggressive behaviours and negative ecological impacts. Factor analysis revealed three perceptual clusters, demonstrating that some species evoke multidimensional responses whilst others are viewed through a single dominant lens. Notably, aesthetic patterns did not universally predict appeal and many highly rated raptor species were valued for emotional connections rather than physical traits. Additionally, negative perceptions did not apply uniformly to all non-native or problematic species, with some receiving moderately positive responses despite ecological concerns. These findings highlight the complexity of human-bird relationships in urban contexts and demonstrate that large language models can enable qualitative analysis at large scales. By offering an African perspective, this study contributes to a more inclusive understanding of how urban residents perceive and value birds.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence (AI), ChatGPT, citizen science, Global South, human-wildlife relationships, UrbanBiodiversity, urbanisation

Received: 16 Oct 2025; Accepted: 03 Dec 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Naidoo and Reynolds. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Sage K. Naidoo

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.