Abstract
A single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of the XKR4 gene has been linked to Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). This gene is preferentially expressed in cerebellum, a brain structure implicated in this disorder. This study investigated the effects of this SNP on cerebellar development in children with and without ADHD. We collected 279 longitudinal T1-weighted structural images and DNA from 58 children with ADHD and 64 typically developing (TD) children matched for age, IQ, and gender. Groups were divided by the XKR4 rs2939678 SNP into A-allele carriers versus subjects homozygous for the G-allele. Cerebellar lobular volumes were segmented into 35 regions of interest using MAGeTBrain, an automated multi-atlas segmentation pipeline for anatomical MRI, and statistically analyzed using linear mixed models. We found decreased gray matter (GM) volumes in ADHD compared to TD children in bilateral lobules VIIIA, left VIIIB, right VIIB, and vermis VI. Furthermore, we found a linear age by gene interaction in left lobule VIIB where subjects homozygous for the G-allele showed a decrease in volume over time compared to A-allele carriers. We further found quadratic age × gene and age × diagnosis interactions in left lobule IV. Subjects homozygous for the G-allele (the genotype overtransmitted in ADHD) showed more suppressed, almost flat quadratic growth curves compared to A-allele carriers, similar to individuals with ADHD compared to controls. However, there was no interaction between genotype and diagnosis, suggesting that any effects of this SNP on cerebellar development are not specific to the disorder.
Introduction
Neuroimaging studies have implicated the cerebellum in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). However, findings have been inconsistent () and few studies have examined genetic risk-factors related to these changes. Two studies have suggested that there may be an association between a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the XKR4-gene, which is expressed in the cerebellum, and ADHD (; ). XKR4 codes for a XK-related protein in the XK-Kell blood group complex. While the function of this gene is not well characterized in the brain, XK is highly expressed in the Purkinje cells of the cerebellum in mouse and human tissue (; ). It has been associated with addiction and substance abuse (), as well as cognitive deficits, including poor self-restraint, memory, executive function and neuropsychiatric symptoms in McLeod syndrome, a genetically transmitted disorder of the XK-Kell blood group complex (; ; ; ). Additionally, mutations upstream from the XKR4 gene have been shown to mediate response to antipsychotic medication (; ). An initial investigation from our lab of XKR4 genotype effects in ADHD showed an interaction with birth weight on decreased total cerebellar volume ().
Although not all studies of cerebellum volume in ADHD have been consistent, several cerebellar regions have been implicated multiple times in the disorder. Early studies reported smaller total cerebellar volume in children and adolescents with ADHD compared to their typically developing (TD) peers (), as well as smaller right cerebellum volume (), and posterior vermis VIII-X volumes (; ; ). More recent studies have replicated findings in posterior vermis (; ) and suggested that there may be correlations with symptom severity (; ), as well as a normalizing effect of medication use (). In addition, reduced volume has been reported for left lobules IV-VI, VIII, IX, X and right lobules IV, VIII, IX () and bilateral Crus I (; ). In adults with ADHD, a study using a whole brain ROI approach reported decreased gray matter (GM) in bilateral posterior cerebellum (). Longitudinal studies have suggested that reductions in cerebellar volume in ADHD are stable over development (; ; ).
In this study, we set out to investigate whether our previous findings of XKR4 gene effects on the cerebellum were regionally specific, stable over development and, particularly, related to ADHD diagnosis. We assessed the XKR4 rs2939678 SNP and measured regional cerebellar volumes in a longitudinal sample and ran mixed model regression analyses to investigate the effect of the SNP associated with ADHD on cerebellar development. We hypothesized that the associated polymorphism of XKR4 and diagnosis would both be associated with reduced volume, specifically in previously implicated areas, that changes would be stable over development and that there would be an interaction between genotype and diagnosis, where gene effects were greatest for those individuals affected by the disorder.
Materials and Methods
The Medical Ethical Review Board of the University Medical Center Utrecht approved the study and its procedures.
Participants
One hundred and twenty-two children (64 TD and 58 children with ADHD) participated in this study from a larger ongoing longitudinal cohort for whom DAT1 and DRD4 had previously been determined (). Groups were matched for age, gender, and IQ (Table 1). Written consent was obtained from the parents with full knowledge of the purpose and procedure of the study and children provided written or verbal assent. To confirm inclusion criteria, the DISC-IV parent version () was administered to confirm clinical diagnosis of ADHD or rule out psychiatric morbidity in control participants. In controls, exclusion criteria included history of psychiatric illness in a first-degree relative or any major physical or neurological disorder. In both groups, additional exclusion criteria included any major physical or neurological disorder including dyslexia. Additionally, parents completed the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL; ) for a dimensional measure of behavioral symptoms. A four subset Dutch short version of the WISC-R or WISC-III () was used to assess IQ. At baseline scan, information on medication use was available for 46 of the participants with ADHD, of which 38 reported a history of taking psychostimulants (methylphenidate) and one taking amphetamines (dexamphetamine; Table 1).
Table 1
| Baseline | TD-GG | TD-A carrier | ADHD-GG | ADHD-A carrier |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (M/F) | 42/8 | 13/1 | 32/5 | 20/1 |
| Age (year) | 10.1 (2.0) | 10.3 (1.5) | 10.7 (1.9) | 10.4 (2.5) |
| IQ | 105.2 (14.4) | 107.9 (17.0) | 104.2 (16.5) | 102.1 (17.8) |
| DISC (N) | ||||
| inattentive | 6 | 5 | ||
| hyperactive/impulsive | 8 | 3 | ||
| combined | 23 | 13 | ||
| ODD | 13 | 9 | ||
| CBCL attention problems | 2.8 (2.3) | 2.8 (2.4) | 9.1 (2.6) | 9.5 (3.5) |
| Medication users | 26 | 12 |
Demographic and clinical characteristics [mean (SD)] at baseline.
GG, homozygous G-allele; TD, typically developing; ADHD, Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder; CBCL, Child Behavior Checklist.
There were a total of 279 scans available from these 122 children (Figure 1). Eighty-one children contributed at least a single follow-up scans (TD: 48, ADHD: 33), 51 had a third scan (TD: 37, ADHD: 14), and 25 had a fourth scan (TD: 21, ADHD: 4).
FIGURE 1
Data Acquisition and Processing
A T1-weighted 3D fast field echo scan of the whole head was acquired with 130–150 1.5-mm contiguous coronal slices (Philips Intera; 107 scans) or 160–180 1.2-mm contiguous coronal slices (Philips Achieva; 172 scans) with echo time (TE) 4.6 ms; repetition time (TR) 30 ms; flip angle 30°; field of view (FOV) 256 mm; in-plane voxel size 1 mm × 1 mm.
Scans were processed using MAGeT-Brain1, an automated multi-atlas segmentation pipeline for anatomical MRI. Technical details of the segmentation can be found elsewhere (). Briefly, MAGeT-Brain uses multiple manually labeled high resolution atlases to generate candidate labels for each voxel. Labels are generated by non-linear registration of randomly selected templates to the anatomical atlases, which are then propagated to the target image and candidate labels are chosen via majority vote. For the current project, the cerebellum was segmented into 35 regions of interest (ROIs) including bilateral and vermis III-X (including VIIB and VIIIA/B) as well as bilateral crus I/II and vermis I, VIIA, and corpus medullare.
DNA Collection and Genotyping
DNA was collected using buccal swabs as described previously (; ). We selected a SNP in the XKR4-gene that showed nominal significance in two independent association studies (; ): rs2939678. It was genotyped using Applied Biosystems’ TaqMan SNP assays on ABI Prism 7900 HT real-time thermocyclers. Call rate was >95%, and the SNP did not deviate strongly from Hardy–Weinberg (HW) equilibrium in controls. The XKR4 SNP was recoded to homozygous GG-allele and A-allele carriers (AA and GA) as the number of subjects with homozygous AA-allele carriers was low (one TD, three ADHD subjects). Final groups demographics for baseline are shown in Table 1.
Statistical Analysis
To investigate the relationship between age and volume we used a linear mixed model procedure accounting for uneven interscan intervals, missing data and within subject dependence (). Analyses were performed using the lme4 package in R (). Each dependent measure of the ith family, jth individual, and kth time-point was modeled as described by . Several models including cubic, quadratic and linear age, as well as genotype and diagnosis terms were fit. Intercept, age, diagnosis, and genotype effects were fixed while within person dependence was modeled as a random effect.
The best fit model for each lobule was determined in two steps. First, cubic, quadratic and linear age effects were fit for each lobule using a stepwise approach, where we stepped down to the quadratic model if the cubic model was not significant at p < 0.05, etc. Second, the result was fit to three models: (1) Full interaction between diagnosis, genotype and age, (2) a simpler model with two-way interactions terms and, (3) the simplest model including only main effects. The three models were then compared using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) to find the model fit that explained the most variance while reducing the number of parameters. In each model, gender and slice thickness were entered as covariates. The interrelated nature of the measures means that traditional methods for correcting for multiple comparisons, such as a Bonferroni correction, are overly stringent for this type of study and there is debate in the literature on how to deal with this issue. In this paper, we chose to not apply any correction, given that our main hypothesis was not confirmed even without correction for multiple comparisons. Lastly, we tested for differences in demographic indices using χ2 and 4-group ANOVA where appropriate.
Results
At baseline, groups were matched for age (p = 0.55), IQ (p = 0.76), gender (χ2 = 2.13, p = 0.54) and slice-thickness (χ2 = 1.53, p = 0.68).
There was a main effect of diagnosis in five areas (Figure 2 and Table 2), where children with ADHD showed decreased volume compared to TD controls: in bilateral lobules VIIIA (left: p = 0.002; right: p = 0.026), left VIIIB (p = 0.013), right VIIB (p = 0.018), and vermis VI (0.024). There were no main effects of genotype. We did find an interaction between genotype and age in left lobule VIIB (p = 0.003; Table 2 and Figure 3) and one between genotype and quadratic growth in left lobule IV (p = 0.044; Table 2 and Figure 3). In this last area, there was also an interaction between diagnostic group and quadratic growth (p = 0.048; Table 2 and Figure 3). There were no interactions between genotype and diagnosis. Nor were there any three-way interactions.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 3
Table 2
| Lobule | Model | Intercept | Diagnosis | Gene | D×G | D×A | G×A | D×A2 | G×A2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Left VIIIA | Linear | 4.823(0.476) | 0.42(0.133)** | -0.101(0.147) | |||||
| Vermis VI | Linear | 1.475(0.08) | 0.073(0.032)* | -0.002(0.035) | |||||
| Right VIIB | Linear | 3.521(0.377) | 0.236(0.099)* | -0.03(0.109) | |||||
| Right VIIIA | Linear | 3.305(0.304) | 0.188(0.083)* | -0.002(0.092) | |||||
| Left VIIB | Linear | 3.27(0.368) | 0.216(0.16) | -0.056(0.131) | -0.049(0.189) | 0(0.012) | -0.039(0.013)** | ||
| Left VIIIB | Quadratic | 1.97(0.277) | 0.198(0.078)* | 0.078(0.087) | |||||
| Left IV | Quadratic | 2.503(0.234) | 0.104(0.113) | -0.145(0.094) | 0.012(0.128) | 0.009(0.009) | -0.034(0.009) | -0.003(0.002)* | 0.004(0.002)* |
Best fit regression model for each volume in mL.
Parameters for developmental trajectories β (SE). SE, standard error; ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01; D×G, diagnosis by genotype interaction; D×A, diagnosis by age interaction; G×A, genotype by age interaction.
Discussion
The current study set out to investigate whether XKR4 gene effects on cerebellar GM structure were regionally specific, were stable over development and were related to ADHD. Our primary hypothesis was that the XKR4 polymorphism previously associated with ADHD would interact with diagnosis to for structural differences found in ADHD. This was not confirmed. However, we did find decreases in regional cerebellar GM associated with ADHD, as well as protracted developmental trajectories for children homozygous for the G-allele in left lobules VIIB and IV. This latter finding was similar to the current finding in children with ADHD. Overall, our findings suggest that any effects of XKR4 genotype on cerebellar structure are not specific to ADHD, and do not mirror changes associated with the disorder.
We found decreases in regional GM volume in ADHD, including in bilateral lobule VIII, right VIIB, and vermis VI. Lobule VIII is most notably associated with motor and somatosensory processing (; ; ) and the current result may relate to abnormal motor activity seen in ADHD (). Lobule VII has been associated with language processing, working memory and executive function (; ) and changes in this lobule may therefore be related to the difficulties in these areas that some individuals with ADHD experience (; ). One earlier study also reported decreases in volume in vermis VI in ADHD and many studies have reported decreased volumes in posterior inferior vermis VIII-X (; ; ; ; ). However, these studies have In addition to regional changes in GM volumes in ADHD, we found a genotype by age interaction in left lobule VIIB with subjects homozygous for the G-allele showed a downward growth slope over development and A-allele carriers showed an typically only included children, had small sample sizes or only examined relatively large unsegmented sections of the vermis. upward slope into early adulthood. Furthermore, we found an interaction of age with both diagnostic group and genotype in left lobule IV. Here, the ADHD group showed a more suppressed, almost flat quadratic growth curve compared to TD controls with a peak in late adolescence. Subjects homozygous for the G-allele (the genotype relatively overtransmitted in ADHD) showed a similar trajectory compared to A-carriers. Lobule IV has been associated with motor activity () and anatomical cerebral-cerebellar motor connections (). Differences in this region may be related for the hyperactive motor behavior in ADHD () and motor tics in XKR4 related disorders ().
There are some limitations to our current study. We note that the sample size of the A-allele carrier groups at baseline was relatively small (N = 35: TD = 14, ADHD = 21). Furthermore, the sample size at follow-up was also limited due to attrition. This may have led to null findings for some of the higher order interactions. We also note that multiple comparison correction that was not applied in the current study and therefore suggest a need for future replication. Lastly, we suggest future studies examine whether XKR4 expression may influence ADHD development in the cortex.
In summary, we found decreased GM volume in several posterior lobules of the cerebellum associated with ADHD, similar to earlier studies. We found no evidence of main effects of XKR4 genotype on cerebellar volumes, and only limited effects on regional developmental trajectories. Furthermore, there were no interactions between genotype and diagnosis. In all, these findings suggest that any changes in cerebellum associated with ADHD are not due to effects of XKR4 genotype on cerebellar structure.
Statements
Author contributions
All authors of this manuscript contributed substantially to the scientific process and the writing of the paper. Their contribution included the conception and design of the project, the running of the study, as well as the analysis and interpretation of data. In addition, all authors substantially contributed to either drafting or critically revising the manuscript for important intellectual content and state that they are entirely responsible for the scientific content of this paper.
Funding
This work was supported by VIDI grant 91.776.384 and VICI grant 453-10-005 from Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) to SD.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank all children, parents, and teachers who participated in this study. They further wish to thank Juliette Weusten, Lizanne Schweren, Fenny Zwart, Sanne Veerhoek, Janna van Belle, and Nathalie Vessaz for their assistance with subject recruitment and acquisition of MRI scans throughout the running time of this study, PdZ for his input and Gabriel Devenyi for their help with data-analysis.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Footnotes
References
1
BatesD.MaechlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4.J. Stat. Softw.671–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
2
BerquinP. C.GieddJ. N.JacobsenL. K.HamburgerS. D.KrainA. L.RapoportJ. L.et al (1998). Cerebellum in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a morphometric MRI study.Neurology501087–1093. 10.1212/WNL.50.4.1087
3
BledsoeJ.Semrud-ClikemanM.PliszkaS. R. (2009). A magnetic resonance imaging study of the cerebellar vermis in chronically treated and treatment-naïve children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder combined type.Biol. Psychiatry65620–624. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.11.030
4
BledsoeJ. C.Semrud-ClikemanM.PliszkaS. R. (2011). Neuroanatomical and neuropsychological correlates of the cerebellum in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder–combined type.J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry50593–601. 10.1016/j.jaac.2011.02.014
5
BucknerR. L.KrienenF. M.CastellanosA.DiazJ. C.YeoB. T. T. (2011). The organization of the human cerebellum estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity.J. Neurophysiol.1062322–2345. 10.1152/jn.00339.2011
6
BusharaK. O.WheatJ. M.KhanA.MockB. J.TurskiP. A.SorensonJ.et al (2001). Multiple tactile maps in the human cerebellum.Neuroreport122483–2486. 10.1097/00001756-200108080-200108039
7
BussingR.GrudnikJ.MasonD.WasiakM.LeonardC. (2002). ADHD and conduct disorder: an MRI study in a community sample.World J. Biol. Psychiatry3216–220. 10.3109/15622970209150624
8
CarmonaS.VilarroyaO.BielsaA.TrèmolsV.SolivaJ. C.RoviraM.et al (2005). Global and regional gray matter reductions in ADHD: a voxel-based morphometric study.Neurosci. Lett.38988–93. 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.07.020
9
CastellanosF.GieddJ. N.BerquinP. C.WalterJ. M.SharpW.TranT.et al (2001). Quantitative brain magnetic resonance imaging in girls with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.Arch. Gen. Psychiatry58289–295. 10.1001/archpsyc.58.3.289
10
CastellanosF. X.GieddJ. N.MarshW. L.HamburgerS. D.VaituzisA. C.DicksteinD. P.et al (1996). Quantitative brain magnetic resonance imaging in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.Arch. Gen. Psychiatry53607–616. 10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830070053009
11
CastellanosF. X.LeeP. P.SharpW.JeffriesN. O.GreensteinD. K.ClasenL. S.et al (2002). Developmental trajectories of brain volume abnormalities in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.J. Am. Med. Assoc.2881740–1748. 10.1001/jama.288.14.1740
12
ClapéronA.HattabC.ArmandV.TrottierS.BertrandO.OuimetT. (2007). The Kell and XK proteins of the Kell blood group are not co-expressed in the central nervous system.Brain Res.114712–24. 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.01.106
13
DanekA.RubioJ. P.RampoldiL.HoM.Dobson-StoneC.TisonF.et al (2001). McLeod neuroacanthocytosis: genotype and phenotype.Ann. Neurol.50755–764. 10.1002/ana.10035
14
DanekA.WalkerR. H. (2005). Neuroacanthocytosis.Curr. Opin. Neurol.18386–392. 10.1097/01.wco.0000173464.01888.e9
15
De ZeeuwP.van BelleJ.van DijkS.WeustenJ.KoelemanB.JansonE.et al (2012). Imaging gene and environmental effects on cerebellum in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and typical development.Neuroimage Clin.2103–110. 10.1016/j.nicl.2012.11.010
16
DoyleA. E.FaraoneS. V.SeidmanL. J.WillcuttE. G.NiggJ. T.WaldmanI. D.et al (2005). Are endophenotypes based on measures of executive functions useful for molecular genetic studies of ADHD? J.Child Psychol. Psychiatry Allied Discip.46774–803. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01476.x
17
DurstonS.FossellaJ. A.CaseyB. J.Hulshoff PolH. E.GalvanA.SchnackH. G.et al (2005). Differential effects of DRD4 and DAT1 genotype on fronto-striatal gray matter volumes in a sample of subjects with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, their unaffected siblings, and controls.Mol. Psychiatry10678–685. 10.1038/sj.mp.4001649
18
DurstonS.Hulshoff PolH. E.SchnackH. G.BuitelaarJ. K.SteenhuisM. P.MinderaaR. B.et al (2004). Magnetic resonance imaging of boys with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and their unaffected siblings.J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry43332–340. 10.1097/01.chi.0000107729.75340.f3
19
FijalB. A.StaufferV. L.KinonB. J.ConleyR. R.HoffmannV. P.WitteM. M.et al (2012). Analysis of gene variants previously associated with iloperidone response in patients with schizophrenia who are treated with risperidone.J. Clin. Psychiatry73367–371. 10.4088/JCP.10m06507
20
FoxJ. (2002). Linear Mixed Models—Appendix to An R and S-Plus Companion to Applied Regression.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
21
GoetzM.VeselaM.PtacekR. (2014). Notes on the role of the cerebellum in ADHD.Austin J. Psychiatry Behav. Sci.1:6.
22
GroddW.HulsmannE.LotzeM.WildgruberD.ErbM. (2001). Sensorimotor mapping of the human cerebellum: fMRI evidence of somatotopic organization.Hum. Brain Mapp.1355–73. 10.1002/hbm.1025
23
HewerE.DanekA.SchoserB. G.MirandaM.ReichardR.CastiglioniC.et al (2007). McLeod myopathy revisited: more neurogenic and less benign.Brain1303285–3296. 10.1093/brain/awm269
24
HoveM. J.ZeffiroT. A.BiedermanJ.LiZ.SchmahmannJ.ValeraE. M. (2015). Postural sway and regional cerebellar volume in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.Neuroimage Clin.8422–428. 10.1016/j.nicl.2015.05.005
25
IvanovI.MurroughJ. W.BansalR.HaoX.PetersonB. S. (2014). Cerebellar morphology and the effects of stimulant medications in youths with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder.Neuropsychopharmacology39718–726. 10.1038/npp.2013.257
26
JonsdottirS.BoumaA.SergeantJ. A.ScherderE. J. (2006). Relationships between neuropsychological measures of executive function and behavioral measures of ADHD symptoms and comorbid behavior.Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol.21383–394. 10.1016/j.acn.2006.05.003
27
JungH. H.HergersbergM.KneifelS.AlkadhiH.SchiessR.Weigell-WeberM.et al (2001). McLeod syndrome: a novel mutation, predominant psychiatric manifestations, and distinct striatal imaging findings.Ann. Neurol.49384–392. 10.1002/ana.76
28
LantieriF.GlessnerJ. T.HakonarsonH.EliaJ.DevotoM. (2010). Analysis of GWAS top hits in ADHD suggests association to two polymorphisms located in genes expressed in the cerebellum.Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet.1531127–1133. 10.1002/ajmg.b.31110
29
LavedanC.LicameleL.VolpiS.HamiltonJ.HeatonC.MackK.et al (2009). Association of the NPAS3 gene and five other loci with response to the antipsychotic iloperidone identified in a whole genome association study.Mol. Psychiatry14804–819. 10.1038/mp.2008.56
30
LeeS.ShaQ.WuX.CalendaG.PengJ. (2007). Expression profiles of mouse Kell, XK, and XPLAC mRNA.J. Histochem. Cytochem.55365–374. 10.1369/jhc.6A7126.2006
31
MackieS.ShawP.LenrootR.PiersonR.GreensteinD. K.NugentT. F.et al (2007). Cerebellar development and clinical outcome in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.Am. J. Psychiatry164647–655. 10.1176/appi.ajp.164.4.647
32
MakrisN.LiangL.BiedermanJ.ValeraE. M.BrownA. B.PettyC.et al (2015). Toward defining the neural substrates of ADHD: a controlled structural MRI study in medication-naïve adults.J. Atten. Disord.19944–953. 10.1177/1087054713506041
33
McAlonanG. M.CheungV.CheungC.ChuaS. E.MurphyD. G. M.SucklingJ.et al (2007). Mapping brain structure in attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder: a voxel-based MRI study of regional grey and white matter volume.Psychiatry Res.154171–180. 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2006.09.006
34
MontesL. G. A.Ricardo-GarcellJ.De la TorreL. B.AlcántaraH. P.GarcíaR. B. M.AcostaD. A.et al (2011). Cerebellar gray matter density in females with ADHD combined type: a cross-sectional voxel-based morphometry study.J. Atten. Disord.15368–381. 10.1177/1087054710366421
35
MostofskyS. H.ReissA. L.LockhartP.DencklaM. B. (1998). Evaluation of cerebellar size in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.J. Child Neurol.13434–439. 10.1177/088307389801300904
36
NakaoT.RaduaJ.RubiaK.Mataix-ColsD. (2011). Gray matter volume abnormalities in ADHD: voxel-based meta-analysis exploring the effects of age and stimulant medication.Am. J. Psychiatry1681154–1163. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.11020281
37
NealeB. M.Lasky-SuJ.AnneyR.FrankeB.ZhouK.MallerJ. B.et al (2008). Genome-wide association scan of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 147B, 1337–1344. 10.1002/ajmg.b.30866
38
ParkM. T. M.PipitoneJ.BaerL. H.WinterburnJ. L.ShahY.ChavezS.et al (2014). Derivation of high-resolution MRI atlases of the human cerebellum at 3T and segmentation using multiple automatically generated templates.Neuroimage95217–231. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.037
39
PitcherT. M.PiekJ. P.HayD. A. (2003). Fine and gross motor ability in males with ADHD.Dev. Med. Child Neurol.45525–535. 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2003.tb00952.x
40
RaznahanA.ShawP.LalondeF.StockmanM.WallaceG. L.GreensteinD.et al (2011). How does your cortex grow?J. Neurosci.317174–7177. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0054-11.2011
41
SchmahmannJ. D.PandyaD. N. (1997). The cerebrocerebellar system.Int. Rev. Neurobiol.4131–60. 10.1016/s0074-7742(08)60346-3
42
SeidmanL. J.BiedermanJ.LiangL.ValeraE. M.MonuteauxM. C.BrownA.et al (2011). Gray matter alterations in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder identified by voxel based morphometry.Biol. Psychiatry69857–866. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.09.053
43
ShafferD.FisherP.LucasC. P.DulcanM. K.Schwab-StoneM. E. (2000). NIMH diagnostic interview schedule for children version IV (NIMH DISC-IV): description, differences from previous versions, and reliability of some common diagnoses.J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry3928–38. 10.1097/00004583-200001000-00014
44
StoodleyC. J.SchmahmannJ. D. (2009). Functional topography in the human cerebellum: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.Neuroimage44489–501. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.039
45
StoodleyC. J.ValeraE. M.SchmahmannJ. D. (2012). Functional topography of the cerebellum for motor and cognitive tasks: an fMRI study.Neuroimage591560–1570. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.065
46
UhlG. R.DrgonT.JohnsonC.FatusinO. O.LiuQ. R.ContoreggiC.et al (2008). “Higher order” addiction molecular genetics: convergent data from genome-wide association in humans and mice.Biochem. Pharmacol.7598–111. 10.1016/j.bcp.2007.06.042
47
ValeraE. M.FaraoneS. V.MurrayK. E.SeidmanL. J. (2007). Meta-analysis of structural imaging findings in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.Biol. Psychiatry611361–1369. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.06.011
48
VerhulstF.Van Der EndeJ.KootH. (1996). Handleiding voor de CBCL/4-18 (Manual for the CBCL/4-18).Rotterdam: Erasmus Academic Medical Centre.
49
WechslerD. (2005). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children — Derde Editie NL. Handleiding en Verantwoording (Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Dutch Version, Manual, 3rd Edn.London: Harcourt Assessment.
50
YangP.WangP.-N.ChuangK.-H.JongY.-J.ChaoT.-C.WuM.-T. (2008). Absence of gender effect on children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder as assessed by optimized voxel-based morphometry.Psychiatry Res.164245–253. 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2007.12.013
Summary
Keywords
XKR4, ADHD, cerebellum development, cerebellum, neurodevelopmental disorders
Citation
Shook D, Brouwer R, de Zeeuw P, Oranje B and Durston S (2017) XKR4 Gene Effects on Cerebellar Development Are Not Specific to ADHD. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 11:396. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2017.00396
Received
12 July 2017
Accepted
28 November 2017
Published
12 December 2017
Volume
11 - 2017
Edited by
Chris I. De Zeeuw, Sophia Children’s Hospital, Netherlands
Reviewed by
Paul Geoffrey Overton, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom; Erik B. Malarkey, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2017 Shook, Brouwer, de Zeeuw, Oranje and Durston.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Devon Shook, d.a.shook@umcutrecht.nl; dshook@hawaii.edu Sarah Durston, s.durston@umcutrecht.nl
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.