Abstract
The mammalian inner ear has two major parts, the cochlea is responsible for hearing and the vestibular organ is responsible for balance. The cochlea and vestibular organs are connected by a series of canals in the temporal bone and two distinct extracellular fluids, endolymph and perilymph, fill different compartments of the inner ear. Stereocilia of mechanosensitive hair cells in the cochlea and vestibular end organs are bathed in the endolymph, which contains high K+ ions and possesses a positive potential termed endolymphatic potential (ELP). Compartmentalization of the fluids provides an electrochemical gradient for hair cell mechanotransduction. In this study, we measured ELP from adult and neonatal C57BL/6J mice to determine how ELP varies and develops in the cochlear and vestibular endolymph. We measured ELP and vestibular microphonic response from saccules of neonatal mice to determine when vestibular function is mature. We show that ELP varies considerably in the cochlear and vestibular endolymph of adult mice, ranging from +95 mV in the basal turn to +87 mV in the apical turn of the cochlea, +9 mV in the saccule and utricle, and +3 mV in the semicircular canal. This suggests that ELP is indeed a local potential, despite the fact that endolymph composition is similar. We further show that vestibular ELP reaches adult-like magnitude around post-natal day 6, ~12 days earlier than maturation of cochlear ELP (i.e., endocochlear potential). Maturation of vestibular ELP coincides with the maturation of vestibular microphonic response recorded from the saccular macula, suggesting that maturation of vestibular function occurs much earlier than maturation of hearing in mice.
Introduction
The inner ear of mammals has two major parts, the cochlea is responsible for hearing and the vestibular organ is responsible for balance. The cochlea and vestibular organ are connected by a series of canals in the temporal bone referred to as the bony labyrinth. The bone canals are separated by the membranes in parallel spaces referred to as the membranous labyrinth. Two distinct extracellular fluids, endolymph and perilymph, separated by a membranous labyrinth, fill different compartments of the inner ear. Compartmentalization of the fluids establishes an electrochemical gradient between the endolymph, perilymph, and the intracellular compartments necessary for hair cell transduction. Perilymph is found in the scala tympani and scala vestibuli in the cochlea. The perilymph, in continuity with cerebrospinal fluid of the subarachnoid space via the cochlear aqueduct, is rich in Na+ ions and low in K+ ions. Endolymph is the fluid contained within the scala media of the membranous labyrinth of the inner ear; endolymph is high in K+ ions and resembles intracellular fluid in its composition. The endolymph in the scala media continues beyond the base of the cochlea into the vestibular portion of the inner ear. The scala media connects to the saccule via the ductus reuniens, and the endolymph reaches utricle and semicircular canals through the utriculo-endolymphatic duct. The stria vascularis and vestibular dark cells and transitional cells are responsible for endolymph secretion. These structures and cells are the foundations for regulation of inner-ear homeostasis. Impaired function of these structures due to mutations, damage, and aging leads to hearing loss (Steel and Barkway, ; Wu and Marcus, ; Gow et al., ; Wangemann et al., ; Ohlemiller et al., ; Cohen-Salmon et al., ; Sha et al., ; Ni et al., ; Zhang et al., ; Liu et al., ).
The endolymph within the scala media exhibits a constant ~80-mV positive polarization with respect to the perilymph (Von Bekesy, ). This high positive potential in endolymph is called endocochlear potential (EP) or endolymphatic potential (ELP). Because ELP is present in the cochlear and vestibular endolymph, we use EP and vestibular ELP (vELP), respectively, to describe ELP measured from the cochlear and vestibular endolymph. ELP and the concentration gradient of K+ and Ca2+ ions between the endolymph and cytosol of hair cells are thought to be the electrochemical driving force for hair cell mechanotransduction currents (Davis, , ).
ELP has been measured from the auditory and vestibular endolymphatic compartments of mammals and non-mammals (Köppl et al., ). While EP is ~+80 mV in mammals, vELP ranges from +1 to +11 mV (Tasaki, ; Misrahy et al., ; Smith et al., ; Schmidt and Fernandez, ; Schmidt, ; Ninoyu et al., ; Hommerich, ). Since most previous measurements were not obtained from the same species in a similar experimental setting, it is unclear how ELP varies in the inner ear endolymph. Furthermore, development of vELP has not been examined, despite extensive examination into development of EP in the cochleae of mice, gerbils, guinea pigs, cats, and pigs (Schmidt and Fernandez, ; Bosher and Warren, ; Fernández and Hinojosa, ; Uziel et al., ; Woolf et al., ; Ohmura and Yamamoto, ; Rybak et al., ; McGuirt et al., ; Sadanaga and Morimitsu, ; Guo et al., ). Thus, it is still unknown how vELP in different vestibular end organs develops and when it matures. In this study, we measured ELP from adult C57BL/6J mice to determine how ELP varies in the endolymphatic space of the cochlea and vestibule. We also measured development of EP and vELP as well as development of vestibular microphonic response from saccular macula to determine when ELP and vestibular microphonic are functionally mature. These measurements allow us to directly compare the magnitude of ELP recorded from the cochlea and vestibule in adult and neonatal mice. Our measurements from adult mice shows that ELP varies significantly in the inner ear, despite the fact that endolymph ionic composition is similar in the cochlea and vestibule. We further show that vELP and vestibular microphonic reach adult-like responses around post-natal day 6 (P6), suggesting that maturation of vELP and vestibular function occurs much earlier than maturation of EP and auditory function in mice.
Materials and Methods
Animals
Neonatal and adult C57BL/6J mice were bred in-house. For electrophysiological experiments, mice were anesthetized with a combined regimen of ketamine (16.6 mg/ml) and xylazine (2.3 mg/ml) and supplemented as needed to maintain a surgical level of anesthesia. Care and use of the animals in this study were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of Capital Medical University (Beijing) and Creighton University as well as grants from National Science Foundation of China (#81600798 and #81770996) and NIH (R01 DC016807) from the NIDCD.
Recording of EP Through the Lateral Wall of the Cochlea
After anesthesia, tracheotomy was performed in the ventral position without artificial respiration. The tympanic bulla was opened after tissue and musculature overlying the bulla were carefully removed. With a clear view of the cochlea, a small hole was made in the lateral wall of the cochlea in the apical or basal turn using a fine drill. A glass capillary microelectrode (5–8 MΩ) filled with 150 mM KCl was mounted on a Leica micromanipulator. The ground electrode was implanted in the dorsal neck muscles. The microelectrode was inserted into the scala media through the spiral ligament and the stria vascularis by controlling movement of the micromanipulator. The response from the microelectrode was amplified (high-pass filtered at 1 kHz) under current-clamp mode using an Axopatch 200B amplifier (Molecular Probe, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and acquired by software pClamp 10 (Molecular Devices) running on an IBM-compatible computer with a 16-bit A/D converter (Digidata 1440A). The voltage changes during a penetration were continuously recorded under the gap-free model using the Clampex in the pClamp software package (version 10, Molecular Devices). The sampling frequency was 5 kHz. Data were analyzed using Clampfit and Excel.
Recording ELP From Cochlea, Utricle, Saccule, and Semicircular Canal Through Round Window
The microelectrode was mounted on a Leica micromanipulator. The electrode, placed under visual control onto the round window, was advanced manually toward the organ of Corti through the round window membrane. The baseline was adjusted to zero with the tip of the microelectrode in the scala tympani. The microelectrode was then advanced across the scala tympani, through the region of the organ of Corti, and finally into scala media. When the microelectrode passed through the region of the organ of Corti, a negative DC potential was recorded. A stable positive DC potential (i.e., the EP) was observed when the micropipette entered the scala media.
To record vELP from utricle or saccule, the microelectrode advanced further from the scala media to scala vestibuli and finally to the saccule or utricle. To record vELP from the semicircular canal, a small hole was drilled in the anterior canal. The microelectrode, under the control of Leica micromanipulator, was advanced through the membrane labyrinth until a stable positive potential was recorded. To confirm that the recording was made from utricle or saccule, we used fluorescent phalloidin (Lot #: 565227, Invitrogen) to stain F-actin (cytoskeleton and stereocilia bundles of vestibular hair cells). The tip of the microelectrode contained fluorescent phalloidin diluted in 150 mM KCl (with an estimated concentration of 1:100). Phalloidin was injected into the saccule or utricle by applying a positive pressure to the microelectrode. After vELP was measured, the utricle and saccule were dissected out and fixed in 4% PFA for 15 min. The location of the fluorescent stain was determined under a confocal microscope (Zeiss LSM 710).
In vivo Recording of Vestibular Microphonic From Saccular Maculae
The vestibular microphonic was recorded using the same microelectrode to record vELP. To evoke vestibular microphonic from the macula of saccule, direct stapes driving by a piezo actuator was used (Woolf and Ryan, ). The stimulus used to evoke vestibular microphonic was a 400 Hz sinusoid with duration of 100 ms and rise-time of 1 ms. The stimulus was fed to a Burleigh PZ-150M Driver. The piezo actuator (transducer) was glued to the stapes foot through a tapered glass rod (1.5 cm in length and 0.6 mm in diameter at the stapes foot) after the ossicular chain was severed. The magnitude of the piezo motion (peak-to-peak) was pre-set at five levels from ~1 to 3 μm in 0.5 μm increment. We did not expect contribution of cochlear microphonic to our recording as the frequency range of the basilar membrane response (or hearing frequency) of C57BL/6 is above 2 kHz. To rule out the possibility of contribution by cochlear microphonic at high stimulus level, the apical turn of the cochlea was destroyed before vestibular microphonic was recorded. The microphonic signal from the microelectrode was amplified and high-pass filtered (at 1 kHz) under current-clamp mode using an Axopatch 200B amplifier and acquired by software pClamp 10 running on an IBM-compatible computer with a 16-bit A/D converter (Digidata 1440A). The sampling frequency was 5 kHz. Response from 20 presentations was averaged for each recording.
Statistical Analysis
Means and standard deviations (SD) were calculated based on measurements from eight mice at each condition, location and age. Student's t-test was used to determine statistical significance between two different conditions/locations. Probability (P) value ≤ 0.01 was regarded as significant.
Results
EP From Apical and Basal Cochlear Turns of Adult Mice
EP has been measured by using microelectrode through the lateral wall (i.e., spiral ligament and stria) of the cochlea or through the round window, scala tympani and the basilar membrane. Since the round window approach only allows measurement of EP in the basal turn, the lateral wall approach (Figure 1A) was used so that EP from apical and basal turns could be measured and compared (Zhang et al., ; Liu et al., ). Figure 1B shows some examples of EP measured from the apical and basal turns of a one-month-old mouse. The mean EP magnitude obtained from the apical and basal turns of eight mice is presented in the right panel of Figure 1B. The mean EP magnitude measured from the basal turn is +92.3 mV. The EP measured from apical turn is ~7 mV less than that of the basal turn, with a mean magnitude of +85.8 mV. The difference is statistically significant (p < 0.01, n = 8).
Figure 1
As EP is highly dependent on metabolism (Konishi and Teruzo, ; Schmidt and Fernandez, ; Woolf et al., ; Liu et al., ), we examined change in EP magnitude during brief inhalation of CO2 or brief anoxia. CO2 was applied to the area near the opening in the trachea. To examine short-term effects of anoxia on ELP, the trachea was temporally occluded by a pair of forceps. As shown in Figure 1C, the magnitude of EP drops from ~30 to 50 mV within a few seconds after CO2 inhalation or after oxygen intake was blocked. The reduction was reversible after CO2 inhalation or anoxia was ceased.
Development of EP
We measured EP from the cochlear basal turn during development using mice aged between P6 and P60. Figure 2 shows some examples of EP recorded at P6, P9, P14, P21, P30, and P60. Eight mice at each age were measured and mean magnitude of EP is presented in Figure 2B. The magnitude of EP was about +16 mV at P6. At P14, 2 days after hearing onset in mice, the magnitude was >+60 mV. The magnitude continued to grow after P14 and reached +80 mV at P21. The EP magnitude grew again between P21 and P60, although at much slower rate. At P60, the magnitude was >+95 mV. This is consistent with slow EP growth seen between P20 and P60 in previous studies in gerbils (McGuirt et al., ) and C57BL/6J mice (Zhang et al., ).
Figure 2
ELP and Its Development in Saccule and Utricle
ELP from different vestibular end organs was measured to determine if its magnitude was substantially different from EP. To measure ELP from saccule and utricle, the round-window approach was used (Figures 3A,B). Representative examples of recorded potentials are exhibited in Figure 3C as a microelectrode was advanced from scala tympani through the region of the organ of Corti, and into scala media, scala vestibuli, and finally into saccule or saccule. As shown, a negative potential of 80 to 85 mV is seen when the microelectrode passed through the regions of the organ of Corti (Woolf et al., ). This negative organ of Corti potential lasted for a short time, then decayed back to zero. Further advancement of the micropipette into scala media resulted in recording of a stable positive DC potential of 90 to 95 mV: the positive EP. The potential went back to zero after the electrode entered scala vestibuli. After the microelectrode passed through the lateral side of the sac of saccule, a stable positive potential of 8–10 mV was seen. When the microelectrode was directed toward utricle after entering the scala vestibuli, a negative potential of ~30 to 40 mV was observed. This potential is similar to the negative potential seen during electrode penetration through part of the organ of the Corti, except that the magnitude of the potential is substantially less. After penetrating through the macula of utricle, a stable positive potential of 8–10 is observed. This is the ELP of the utricle. We recorded vELP from saccule and utricle from eight adult mice. The mean magnitude was 9.5 ± 1.4 mV for saccule and 9.3 ± 1.6 mV for utricle (Figure 3D). No statistical significance was found between them. We measured utricular ELP to determine if utricular ELP is also sensitive to inhalation of CO2 and anoxia. As shown in Figure 3D, the magnitude of ELP is not significantly reduced in response to CO2 inhalation or anoxia.
Figure 3
To determine how vELP changes during development, vELP was measured from saccule of neonatal mice aged between P6 and P60. The mean magnitude is presented in Figure 3E. As shown, the magnitude of vELP from saccule at P6 is not statistically different from that measured at later stages during development, suggesting that vELP already reaches adult-like response at P6.
To verify that the recording electrode was indeed in utricle or saccule, we used fluorescent-labeled phalloidin to stain F-actin. Fluorescent phalloidin was injected to the location of recording by applying positive pressure to the microelectrode after vELP was measured. Since phalloidin stained stereocilia bundles and cytoskeleton of hair cells in the area near the tip of the microelectrode, the location of measurement could be confirmed. Figure 4 shows some representative images obtained from neonatal (P6) and adult saccule and utricle. As shown, the fluorescent signal is observed in a small area in utricle or saccule. Under higher magnification, stereocilia bundles are clearly visible (Figure 4D), confirming that our recordings were made from utricle and saccule.
Figure 4
In vivo Recording of Vestibular Microphonic From the Macula of Saccule
Trincker (Trincker, ) used sharp microelectrode technique to measure vestibular microphonic in response to air-conducted sound to stimulate the vestibular system following surgical destruction of the cochlea, whereas Pastras et al. () recorded vestibular microphonic in response to bone-conducted vibration from utricular or saccular macula. We measured microphonic from saccular maculae from adult and neonatal mice by directly driving stapes motion to determine when saccule was functionally mature during development. Large stimulus was used to drive the response to saturation. The response magnitude at different time points during development was compared. Figure 5A shows some representative response waveforms obtained from the saccular maculae of P6, P14, and P30 mice. As shown, the vestibular microphonic resembles the stimulus with strong distortion due to higher stimulation level. The peak-to-peak magnitude of the saturated response at P30 is ~200 μV. This magnitude was comparable to a previous study using bone-conducted vibration (Pastras et al., ). We compared the peak-to-peak magnitude of the saturated response obtained from P6, P14, and P30 mice. The magnitude at P6 was not statistically different from that at P14 and P30, suggesting that vestibular microphonic is already adult-like at P6.
Figure 5
ELP and Its Development in the Semicircular Canal
ELP from anterior semicircular canal was measured in adult and neonatal mice. After the electrode penetrated through the membrane labyrinth, a stable positive potential of ~2 to 3 mV was observed (Figure 5B). This DC potential was substantially smaller than ELP recorded from saccule and utricle. We measured vELP from semicircular canal of eight mice at P30 and the mean magnitude was +2.5 ± 0.8 mV (bottom panel of Figure 5C). To determine how vELP develops in the semicircular canal, neonatal mice aged between P2 and P30 were used. As shown in Figure 5C, vELP is small at P2, < +0.4 mV. At P6, the magnitude reaches 2.2 mV, which is not statistically significant from the magnitude observed at P9 and other later stages during development. This suggests that the ELP in the semicircular canal reaches adult-like response before or at P6.
Discussion
By measuring ELP from endolymphatic space in different inner ear compartments of adult mice, we showed that the magnitude of ELP maintained in endolymph relative to perilymph varies significantly, ranging from +95 mV in the cochlear base and +87 mV in the cochlear apex, to +9 mV in the maculae of saccule and utricle, to +3 mV in the semicircular canal. The magnitude of ELP at different locations of the cochlear and vestibular endolymphatic space is summarized in Figure 6. In the cochlea, the difference between apical and basal turn is ~8 mV. This is consistent with 7 mV seen in mice (Sadanaga and Morimitsu, ) and close to ~10 mV observed in guinea pigs and rats (Kuijpers and Bonting, ; Rybak et al., ). It is not clear why EP is different between the apex and base. We speculate that more stria cells in the cochlear base may contribute to a larger EP since the size of stria is bigger in the basal turn of the cochlea and since EP is generated and maintained by stria.
Figure 6
Our study also showed that ELP in the vestibular endolymphatic compartment is between +3 to +9 mV. Previous studies in guinea pigs showed that vELP ranges from +1 to +11 mV. Tasaki (Tasaki,
The difference in ELP magnitude between the cochlear and vestibular endolymph compartments suggests that ELP is a local potential with limited capability to spread (e.g., +95 mV in the basal turn of the cochlea vs. +8 mV in saccule), perhaps due to the leak current of the mechanotransduction channels in the stereocilia of hair cells. It is unclear why a larger electrical gradient is needed for cochlear hair cells but not so much for vestibular hair cells. However, it is clear that the ELP magnitude is not directly proportional to superiority of high sensitivity as non-mammalian vertebrates such as birds, which exhibit comparable sensitivity as mammals, show a lower EP between 0 and +35 mV. This is closer to the potential observed in the vestibular endolymph of the mammalian inner ear, despite the fact that the ionic composition is similar in all vertebrates and in vestibular and cochlear endolymph. The huge difference of ELP in cochlear and vestibular end organs does raise two important questions: Is the magnitude of EP really critical for mechanotransduction and why ELP needs to be substantially higher in the cochlea than in the vestibular end organs? The results from current study seem to suggest that the magnitude of ELP may not be as critical as believed; hair cells in saccule, utricle and crista ampullaris do not seem to rely on a larger driving force (electrical gradient) for mechanotransduction.
While cochlear microphonic has extensively been used to examine hair cell and cochlear function, vestibular microphonic has only been reported in a handful of publications mostly involving non-mammalian and ex vivo models (Adrian et al.,
Development of EP has been examined in rabbits, rodents, guinea pigs and pigs before. In rabbit, EP development begins at P5 and reaches adult-like magnitude around P15 (Anggard,
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The animal study was reviewed and approved by Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Author contributions
YL and DH designed the experiments. YL, HL, XZ, and DH performed the experiments. YL and DH wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
The research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China #81870718 and #81770996 to YL and by NIH grant R01 DC 016807 to DH from the NIDCD.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AdrianE. D.CraikK. J. W.SturdyR. S. (1938). The electrical response of the auditory mechanism in cold-blooded vertebrates. Proc. R. Soc. London125, 435–455. 10.1098/rspb.1938.0036
2
AnggardL. (1965). An electrophysiological study of the development of cochlear functions in the rabbit. Acta Otolaryngol.20:21.
3
BosherS. K.WarrenR. L. (1971). A study of the electrochemistry and osmotic relationships of the cochlear fluids in the neonatal rat at the time of the development of the endocochlear potential. J Physiol.212, 739–761. 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009354
4
Castelhano-CarlosM. J.SousaN.OhlF.BaumansV. (2010). Identification methods in newborn C57BL/6 mice: a developmental and behavioural evaluation. Lab. Anim.44, 88–103. 10.1258/la.2009.009044
5
Cohen-SalmonM.RegnaultB.CayetN.CailleD.DemuthK.HardelinJ. P.et al. (2007). Connexin30 deficiency causes instrastrial fluid-blood barrier disruption within the cochlear stria vascularis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.104, 6229–6234. 10.1073/pnas.0605108104
6
CoreyD. P.HudspethA. J. (1983). Analysis of the microphonic potential of the bullfrog's sacculus. J. Neurosci.3, 942–961. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.03-05-00942.1983
7
DavisH. (1957). Biophysics and physiology of the inner ear. Physiol. Rev.37, 1–49. 10.1152/physrev.1957.37.1.1
8
DavisH. (1965). A model for transducer action in the cochlea. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol.30, 181–190. 10.1101/SQB.1965.030.01.020
9
FernándezC.HinojosaR. (1974). Postnatal development of endocochlear potential and stria vascularis in the cat. Acta Otolaryngol.78, 173–186. 10.3109/00016487409126343
10
GowA.DaviesC.SouthwoodC. M.FrolenkovG.ChrustowskiM.NgL.et al. (2004). Deafness in Claudin 11null mice reveals the critical contribution of basal cell tight junctions to stria vascularis function. J. Neurosci.24, 7051–7062. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1640-04.2004
11
GuoW.YiH.YanZ.RenL.ChenL.ZhaoL. D.et al. (2017). The morphological and functional development of the stria vascularis in miniature pigs. Reprod. Fertil. Dev.29, 585–593. 10.1071/RD15183
12
HommerichC. P. (1990). Ototoxicity of loop diuretics. Morphological and electrophysiological examinations in animal experiments. Adv. Otorhinolaryngol.44, 92–164. 10.1159/000417721
13
KimS. H.KimU.-K.LeeW.-S.BokJ.SongJ.-W.SeongJ. K.et al. (2011). Albumin-like protein is the major protein constituent of luminal fluid in the human endolymphatic Sac. PLoS ONE6:e21656. 10.1371/journal.pone.0021656
14
Konishi and Teruzo. (1961). Effect of anoxia on cochlear potentials. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.33:349. 10.1121/1.1908659
15
KöpplC.WilmsV.RussellI. J.NothwangH. G. (2018). Evolution of endolymph secretion and endolymphatic potential generation in the vertebrate inner ear. Brain Behav. Evol.92, 1–31. 10.1159/000494050
16
KuijpersW.BontingS. L. (1970). The cochlear potentials. II. The nature of the cochlear endolymphatic resting potential. Pflugers Arch.320, 359–372. 10.1007/BF00588214
17
LiuH.LiY.ChenL.ZhangQ.PanN.NicholsD. H.et al. (2016). Organ of corti and stria vascularis: is there an interdependence for survival?PLoS ONE11:e0168953. 10.1371/journal.pone.0168953
18
LowensteinO.RobertsT. D. (1951). The localization and analysis of the responses to vibration from the isolated elasmobranch labyrinth; a contribution to the problem of the evolution of hearing in vertebrates. J Physiol.114, 471–489. 10.1113/jphysiol.1951.sp004638
19
McGuirtJ. P.SchmiedtR. A.SchulteB. A. (1995). Development of cochlear potentials in the neonatal gerbil. Hear. Res.84, 52–60. 10.1016/0378-5955(95)00015-V
20
MisrahyG. A.HildrethK. M.ShinabargerE. W.GannonW. J. (1958). Electrical properties of wall of endolymphatic space of the cochlea (guinea pig). Am. J. Physiol.194, 396–402. 10.1152/ajplegacy.1958.194.2.396
21
NiC.ZhangD.BeyerL. A.HalseyK. E.FukuiH.RaphaelY.et al. (2013). Hearing dysfunction in heterozygous Mitf(Mi-wh)/+ mice, a model for waardenburg syndrome type 2 and tietz syndrome. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res.26, 78–87. 10.1111/pcmr.12030
22
NinoyuO.HommerichC.MorgensternC. (1987). Endolymph formation in the inner ear of pigeons. ORL J. Otorhinolaryngol. Relat. Spec.49, 1–8. 10.1159/000275899
23
OhlemillerK. K.LettJ. M.GagnonP. M. (2006). Cellular correlates of age-related endocochlear potential reduction in a mouse model. Hear. Res.220, 10–26. 10.1016/j.heares.2006.06.012
24
OhmuraM.YamamotoE. (1990). Differences in endocochlear potentials in response to anoxia in maturing and mature guinea pigs. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol.248, 8–10. 10.1007/BF00634771
25
PastrasC. J.CurthoysI. S.BrownD. J. (2017). In vivo recording of the vestibular microphonic in mammals. Hear. Res.354, 38–47. 10.1016/j.heares.2017.07.015
26
RabbittR. D.BoyleR.HolsteinG. R.HighsteinS. M. (2005). Hair-cell versus afferent adaptation in the semicircular canals. J. Neurophysiol.93, 424–436. 10.1152/jn.00426.2004
27
RybakL. P.WhitworthC.ScottV. (1992). Development of endocochlear potential and compound action potential in the rat. Hear. Res.59, 189–194. 10.1016/0378-5955(92)90115-4
28
SadanagaM.MorimitsuT. (1995). Development of endocochlear potential and its negative component in mouse cochlea. Hear. Res89, 155–161. 10.1016/0378-5955(95)00133-X
29
SchmidtR. S. (1963). Types of endolymphatic potentials. Comp. Biochem. Physiol.10, 83–87. 10.1016/0010-406X(63)90105-1
30
SchmidtR. S.FernandezC. (1962). Labyrinthine DC potentials in representative vertebrates. J. Cell. Comp. Physiol.59, 311–322. 10.1002/jcp.1030590311
31
SchmidtR. S.FernandezC. (1963). Development of mammalian endocochlear potential. J. Exp. Zool.153, 227–235. 10.1002/jez.1401530305
32
ShaS. H.KanickiA.DootzG.TalaskaA. E.HalseyK.et al. (2008). Age-related auditory pathology in the CBA/J mouse. Hear. Res.243, 87–94. 10.1016/j.heares.2008.06.001
33
SmithC. A.DavisH.DeatherageB. H.GessertC. F. (1958). DC potentials of the membranous labyrinth. Am. J. Physiol.193, 203–206. 10.1152/ajplegacy.1958.193.1.203
34
SteelK. P.BarkwayC. (1989). Another role for melanocytes: their importance for normal stria vascularis development in the mammalian inner ear. Development107, 453–463.
35
TasakiI. (1957). Hearing. Annu. Rev. Physiol.19, 417–438. 10.1146/annurev.ph.19.030157.002221
36
TrinckerD. (1959). Electrophysiological studies of the labyrinth of the guinea pig. II. The changes of the DC potentials inside the ampullae of the semicircular canals during experimental cupula deviations. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol.68, 148–152. 10.1177/000348945906800112
37
UzielA.RomandR.MarotM. (1981). Development of cochlear potentials in rats. Audiology20, 89–100. 10.3109/00206098109072687
38
Von BekesyG. (1952). Resting potentials inside the cochlear partition of the guinea pig. Nature169, 241–242. 10.1038/169241a0
39
WangemannP. (1995). Comparison of ion transport mechanisms between vestibular dark cells and strial marginal cells. Hear. Res.90, 149–157. 10.1016/0378-5955(95)00157-2
40
WangemannP.ItzaE. M.AlbrechtB.WuT.JabbaS. V.MagantiR. J.et al. (2004). Loss of KCNJ10 protein expression abolishes endocochlear potential and causes deafness in Pendred syndrome mouse model. BMC Med.2:30. 10.1186/1741-7015-2-30
41
WoolfN. K.RyanA. F. (1988). Contributions of the middle ear to the development of function in the cochlea. Hear. Res.35, 131–142. 10.1016/0378-5955(88)90112-8
42
WoolfN. K.RyanA. F.HarrisJ. P. (1986). Development of mammalian endocochlear potential: normal ontogeny and effects of anoxia. Am. J. Physiol.250, R493–498. 10.1152/ajpregu.1986.250.3.R493
43
WuT.MarcusD. C. (2003). Age-related changes in cochlear endolymphatic potassium and potential in CD-1 and CBA/CaJ mice. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol.4, 353–362. 10.1007/s10162-002-3026-6
44
ZhangQ.LiuH.SoukupG. A.HeD. Z. (2014). Identifying microRNAs involved in aging of the lateral wall of the cochlear duct. PLoS ONE9:e112857. 10.1371/journal.pone.0112857
45
ZottermanY. (1943). The microphonic effect of teleost labyrinths and its biological significance. J. Physiol.102, 313–318. 10.1113/jphysiol.1943.sp004037
Summary
Keywords
cochlea, vestibule, endolymphatic potential, endocochlear potential, vestibular microphonic, mouse
Citation
Li Y, Liu H, Zhao X and He DZ (2020) Endolymphatic Potential Measured From Developing and Adult Mouse Inner Ear. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 14:584928. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2020.584928
Received
07 August 2020
Accepted
17 November 2020
Published
07 December 2020
Volume
14 - 2020
Edited by
Riccardo Fesce, Humanitas University, Italy
Reviewed by
Wei Xiong, Tsinghua University, China; Helge Rask-Andersen, Uppsala University, Sweden
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2020 Li, Liu, Zhao and He.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yi Li alinaliyi@163.com
This article was submitted to Cellular Neurophysiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.