Abstract
Human cerebral organoid (CO) is a three-dimensional (3D) cell culture system that recapitulates the developing human brain. While CO has proved an invaluable tool for studying neurological disorders in a more clinically relevant matter, there have still been several shortcomings including CO variability and reproducibility as well as lack of or underrepresentation of certain cell types typically found in the brain. As the technology to generate COs has continued to improve, more efficient and streamlined protocols have addressed some of these issues. Here we present a novel scalable and simplified system to generate microglia-containing CO (MCO). We characterize the cell types and dynamic development of MCOs and validate that these MCOs harbor microglia, astrocytes, neurons, and neural stem/progenitor cells, maturing in a manner that reflects human brain development. We introduce a novel technique for the generation of embryoid bodies (EBs) directly from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) that involves simplified steps of transitioning directly from 3D cultures as well as orbital shaking culture in a standard 6-well culture plate. This allows for the generation of MCOs with an easy-to-use system that is affordable and accessible by any general lab.
Introduction
The brain is a complex organ consisting of intricate neural networks with extensive functions. Understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying neurodevelopmental disorders and neurological/neuropsychiatric diseases has been complicated by the limited availability of clinical tissues and animal models to fully reflect the human brain. In the last decade, advances in stem cell technology have led to the use of human-induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) to generate three-dimensional (3D) models termed cerebral organoids (COs; Lancaster et al., 2013). Within COs, cells self-organize into 3D tissues and differentiate into multiple cell types, recapitulating many features of human neurodevelopment (Amiri et al., 2018; Velasco et al., 2019). Because human iPSCs can be readily generated from any cell type using advanced reprogramming techniques, COs have been extensively utilized to help uncover pathogenic mechanisms and guide drug discovery in a number of neurological diseases and disorders. These applications include neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism spectrum disorders and related disorders (Mariani et al., 2015; Chailangkarn et al., 2016; Birey et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2017; Mellios et al., 2018; Gouder et al., 2019; Sun et al., 2019), neuropsychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia (Srikanth et al., 2015; Stachowiak et al., 2017; Ye et al., 2017; De Vrij et al., 2019; Kathuria et al., 2020), structural and migration disorders such as microencephaly and lissencephaly (Lancaster et al., 2013; Bershteyn et al., 2017; Iefremova et al., 2017; Li et al., 2017a,b; Fiddes et al., 2018; Karzbrun et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2019), and even neurotropic viral infections such as Zika Virus (Cugola et al., 2016; Dang et al., 2016; Qian et al., 2016; Gabriel et al., 2017; Li et al., 2017b; Watanabe et al., 2017) and SARS-CoV-2 (Jacob et al., 2020; Pellegrini et al., 2020a; Ramani et al., 2020; Yang et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020).
Since the inception of COs, there have been rapid and significant advancements in organoid culture technology, increasing their accessibility and reproducibility. Original protocols for COs require the use of expensive and bulky equipment and a large volume of reagents, as spinning culture is necessary for enhanced nutrient availability (Lancaster et al., 2013; Lancaster and Knoblich, 2014); newer protocols have utilized innovative methods such as 3D-printed spinning bioreactors (Qian et al., 2016, 2018), allowing for increased efficiency and larger-scale production of COs. Many studies have incorporated the directed differentiation to generate various brain region-specific COs, including the midbrain (Jo et al., 2016; Qian et al., 2016, 2018; Monzel et al., 2017; Jacob et al., 2020), hippocampus (Sakaguchi et al., 2015; Jacob et al., 2020), choroid plexus (Sakaguchi et al., 2015; Jacob et al., 2020; Pellegrini et al., 2020a,b), thalamus (Xiang et al., 2019, 2020), ganglionic eminence (Bagley et al., 2017; Birey et al., 2017; Watanabe et al., 2017; Xiang et al., 2017, 2018), hypothalamus/pituitary (Suga et al., 2011; Ogawa et al., 2018; Qian et al., 2018; Kasai et al., 2020; Matsumoto et al., 2020), and cerebellum (Muguruma et al., 2015; Holmes and Heine, 2017; Watson et al., 2018). Further innovations include the fusion of region-specific COs to generate “brain assembloids,” which are particularly useful for studying interneuron migration and neuronal projections between organoid structures (Bagley et al., 2017; Birey et al., 2017; Xiang et al., 2017, 2018, 2019; Sloan et al., 2018; Wörsdörfer et al., 2019).
In order to most accurately reflect neurodevelopment, it is important that all cell types within the developing human brain are proportionally represented as closely as possible. However, one of the current limitations for the original CO protocols is not all these cell types are readily generated, particularly for cell types of non-ectodermal origin. Since microglia derives from mesoderm while neural stem cells (NSCs)/neural progenitor cells (NPCs) derive from neuroepiderm, early studies had to culture iPSC-derived microglia and NSCs/NPCs separately first and then co-culture them (Schwartz et al., 2015; Muffat et al., 2016, 2018; Abud et al., 2017; Douvaras et al., 2017; Haenseler et al., 2017; Garcia-Reitboeck et al., 2018; Song et al., 2019; Wörsdörfer et al., 2019). Most recent studies documented that non-inhibition of bone morphogenetic protein signaling during CO culture allowed the generation of mesoderm-derived progenitor cells within COs (Quadrato et al., 2017; Ormel et al., 2018). Of interest, one study modified neural induction condition by reducing heparin concentration, rendering the innate generation of mesodermal cells, which readily differentiated into microglial cells within the CO, named MCO (Ormel et al., 2018).
Following this approach for inclusion of innate microglia that plays an essential role in brain development, neural innate immunity, neuroinflammation, and neurotropic viral infection, we developed a novel scalable and simplified protocol for the generation of MCO from human iPSCs. Most CO protocols require complicated systems involving manual selection of iPSC colonies and growing in aggregates in droplet suspension (Amiri et al., 2018; Ormel et al., 2018; Velasco et al., 2019). Our protocol utilizes a novel method for direct transition from iPSC aggregate 3D culture to embryoid bodies (EBs), which has not been previously reported. Furthermore, our system uses six-well plates on an orbital shaker for constant shaking culture, which are easily accessible materials for most labs. This also significantly reduces the amount of culture media needed for COs, further reducing cost. Here we validated the MCO model with an easy-to-use scalable protocol.
Materials and Methods
Generation and Expansion of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Human primary fibroblasts from apparently healthy individuals were purchased from the Coriell Institute for Medical Research [GM00942 and GM00969]. These fibroblasts were used to generate human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) at the University of Pennsylvania’s iPSC Core using CytoTune 1.0 Sendai Virus reprogramming factors (Thermofisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s directions. After iPSC lines were established, they were transferred to and maintained in feeder-free conditions using mTeSR-Plus serum-free media (Stem Cell Technologies) on 6-well plates coated with 1:100 Matrigel hESC-qualified matrix (Corning), according to the manufacturer protocols. Cells were passaged when 70–90% confluent (around 3–5 days) using ReLeSR enzyme-free passaging reagent (Stem Cell Technologies). Cells were checked for karyotypic abnormalities every five passages using the iPSC Genetic Analysis Kit (Stem Cell Technologies), following manufacturer protocols. All iPSCs used for organoid generation were between passages 12 and 25. All cells and organoids were maintained in an incubator at 37°C and 5% CO2.
Suspension 3D Culture of iPSCs
To generate 3D spheres, iPSCs were dissociated as clusters from Matrigel-coated plates using ReLeSR (Stem Cell Technologies) and resuspended in mTeSR-3D seed medium (Stem Cell Technologies) containing 10 μM Y-27632 ROCK inhibitor (Stem Cell Technologies). The dissociated iPSC clusters were then seeded on low-attachment 6-well plates and maintained on an orbital shaker (Benchmark Scientific, BT4001), shaking constantly at 65–70 rpm. The iPSCs aggregated to form 3D spheres in suspension culture and mTeSR 3D feed medium was added every day.
Generation of Embryoid Bodies Directly From 3D Culture via Neural Induction for Microglia-Containing Cerebral Organoids (MCOs)
When 3D spheres were around 300–400 μm in diameter (around 4–5 days), they were collected in a 15-ml conical tube. The old medium was aspirated off and replaced with EB medium (Lancaster and Knoblich, 2014; Bagley et al., 2017), which consists of DMEM/F-12 (Corning), 20% KnockOut Serum Replacement (KOSR; Gibco), 3% hESC-quality FBS (Gibco), 1 mM GlutaMAX (Gibco), 0.1 mM minimal essential medium non-essential amino acids (MEM-NEAA; Gibco), 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Corning), and 0.1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol (Pierce). The iPSC 3D spheres in EB medium were cultured in low-attachment 6-well plates, at a density of 50–100 spheres per well to generate EB (considered day 0 of organoid culture) directly from 3D spheres. After 2 days (day 2), of the EB medium was refreshed. After 4 days of EB culture (Day 4), of the medium was changed every other day using neural induction medium (NIM; Ormel et al., 2018), which consists of DMEM/F-12, 1% N2 supplement (Gibco), 1 mM GlutaMAX, 0.1 mM MEM-NEAA, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, and 0.1 μg/ml heparin (Stem Cell Technologies), 10- to 100-fold lower than original CO culture protocols (Lancaster and Knoblich, 2014; Krefft et al., 2018; Yakoub and Sadek, 2018; Zhang et al., 2019), which is the critical step for the induction of innate microglia generation (Ormel et al., 2018).
Matrigel Embedding and Organoid Maturation
On day 12, organoids were embedded in growth-factor reduced Matrigel (Corning), as described previously with modification (Qian et al., 2018). Briefly, organoids were collected to 15 ml conical tube and resuspended in 1 ml of cerebral organoid differentiation medium (CODM; Lancaster and Knoblich, 2014), which consists of a 1:1 ratio of DMEM/F-12 and Neurobasal medium (Gibco), 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 1% B27 supplement without vitamin A (Gibco), 0.5% N2 supplement, 2.5 μg/ml insulin, 0.05 mM MEM-NEAA, and 0.05 mM 2-mercaptoethanol. Using cut pipette tips, organoids in microcentrifuge tubes (~20–30 per tube) were resuspended with Matrigel (2:3) and spread onto low-attachment 6-well plates. Once solidified at 37°C for 30 min, 2 ml CODM was added to each well, and plates were kept in the incubator in non-spinning culture. On day 16, organoids were mechanically dissociated from the Matrigel and resuspended in CODM with vitamin A (CODMA), which is prepared the same way as CODM, but uses 1% B27 supplement with vitamin A (Gibco). Organoids were maintained in spinning culture, and media was changed every 3–4 days until experimental endpoints.
Multilabeled Fluorescent Immunocytochemistry and Confocal Image Analysis
Organoids were fixed overnight using 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA). After fixation, organoids were incubated in 30% sucrose then embedded and frozen in optimal cutting tissue (OCT) medium. Frozen tissues were sectioned using cryostat at 10 μm thickness. Sections were permeabilized with 0.5% TritonX-100/1× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 30 min, blocked with 10% donkey serum for 1 h, and incubated with primary antibodies (Table 1) in 0.1% TritonX-100/1× PBS overnight at 4°C. The next day, slides were washed with 1× PBS and incubated with the corresponding Alexa Fluor AffiniPure secondary antibodies (Jackson Immuno Research Labs; donkey anti-goat, anti-rabbit, anti-mouse, or anti-chicken IgG (H + L) 488, 594, or 680) at a 1:400 dilution for 1 h at room temperature, using Hoechst 33258 (1:5,000) as a nuclear counterstain. Slides were then coverslipped using Fluoroshield histology mounting medium (Sigma-Aldrich). Fluorescent confocal images were acquired and analyzed using the Leica SP8 confocal system.
Table 1
| Primary antibody | Species and clonality | Manufacturer | Dilution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iba1 | Rabbit polyclonal | Proteintech, cat. no. 10904–1-AP | 1:200 |
| Doublecortin | Goat polyclonal | Santa cruz biotechnology, cat. no. sc-8066 | 1:500 |
| Tuj1 | Chicken polyclonal | Aves, cat. no. TUJ | 1:2,000 |
| Nestin | Chicken polyclonal | Aves, cat. no. NES | 1:200 |
| GFAP | Chicken polyclonal | Aves, cat. no. GFAP | 1:500 |
| TMEM119 (extracellular) | Mouse monoclonal | BioLegend, cat. no. 853302 | 1:200 |
| SOX2 | Goat polyclonal | Santa cruz biotechnology, cat. no. sc-17320 | 1:200 |
| mGluR5 | Chicken polyclonal | Aves, cat. no. ER5 | 1:200 |
| NeuN | Mouse monoclonal | Millipore-sigma, cat. no. MAB377 | 1:500 |
| Ki67 | Rabbit monoclonal | Abcam, cat. no. ab16667 | 1:400 |
| PAX6 | Mouse monoclonal | DSHB, RRID AB_528427 | 1:200 |
| GAD67 | Chicken polyclonal | Aves, cat. no. GAD | 1:1,000 |
| PSD95 | Rabbit polyclonal | Proteintech, cat. no. 20665–1-AP | 1:400 |
| MAP2 | Chicken polyclonal | Aves, cat. no. MAP | 1:1,000 |
| Synaptophysin | Mouse monoclonal | Dako, cat. no. M0776 | 1:1,000 |
Primary antibodies used for immunohistochemistry.
Note: The PAX6 mouse monoclonal antibody was deposited to the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (DSHB) by Kawakami.
Flow Cytometry
Each MCO was dissociated to a single-cell suspension using Accutase (Corning), passed through a 70 μm nylon cell strainer (Corning) to remove large clumps, and washed with 1× PBS. Cells were centrifuged (500× g for 5 min) and resuspended in 500 μl cell staining buffer (BioLegend cat. no. 420201). Cells were incubated with the primary antibodies anti-CD11b-FITC (Biolegend cat. no. 301329) and anti-P2RY12-PE (Biolegend cat. no. 392103) in the dark for 30 min at room temperature. FITC mouse IgG1-κ (BD Biosciences cat. no. 551954) and PE mouse IgG2a-κ (BD Biosciences cat. no. 555574) were used as isotype controls. Following staining, cells were washed with cell staining buffer, centrifuged, and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. Analysis was performed using Cytek Aurora Flow cytometer.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using Prism GraphPad 9.1. Significance at P < 0.05 was determined between two groups of different time or markers using a two-tailed student’s t-test.
Results
Characterization of iPSCs Derived From Human Fibroblasts by Footprint-Free Sendai Virus Technology
To generate iPSCs, human fibroblasts from apparently healthy individuals were sent to the University of Pennsylvania iPSC Core for reprogramming using Sendai virus technology (Figure 1A) in MEF-feeder culture (Figure 1B). We then transitioned the iPSCs to feeder-free conditions by passaging 3–5 times using mTeSR-Plus medium and maintaining it as a monolayer culture (Figure 1C). The iPSC identity was confirmed using immunocytochemical staining for pluripotency markers, including OCT4, SOX2, and TRA-1–81 (Figure 1D). The iPSC lines were regularly screened for karyotypic abnormalities (Figure 1E) as quality control and maintained in feeder-free conditions for iPSC line expansion.
Figure 1
Efficient Generation of MCOs Using Simple 3D Transition Protocol
Two critical steps were combined to generate MCO. For EB formation, we expanded 2D iPSCs into 3D spheres in suspension culture using mTeSR-3D medium in a 6-well plate under 65–70 rpm in an orbital shaker (Lancaster and Knoblich, 2014; Qian et al., 2018). When the 3D sphere size reached 300–400 μm, we initiated neural induction directly from 3D spheres while shaking by simply switching to neural induction media. To generate MCOs, we modified a recently published protocol (Figure 2A; Ormel et al., 2018) by reducing the heparin concentration to 0.1 μg/ml in the neural induction media from 1 to 10 μg/ml that is widely used for conventional CO culture (Lancaster and Knoblich, 2014; Qian et al., 2018). The dynamic morphological changes we observed during neural induction and MCO maturation (Figure 2B) follow similar patterns to that of typical CO development as widely described across various reports (Lancaster et al., 2013; Lancaster and Knoblich, 2014; Quadrato et al., 2017; Qian et al., 2018; Velasco et al., 2019). Briefly, during EB formation, MCOs begin as small, rounded spheres of generally uniform size. During neural induction, the EBs begin to form neuroepithelial tissue, characterized by a slightly translucent surface occasionally with some budding. The neuroepithelial tissue begins to elongate as radially organized structures. Embedding in Matrigel helps facilitate the growth and organization of neuroepithelial tissue as the MCOs form lobe-like structures. As MCOs continue to mature, they increase in size and maintain a spherical shape.
Figure 2
The feature of the developing brain organoids was validated by determining the presence of neural cells within MCO using multilabeled immunostaining and confocal image analysis. Typical neuroepithelial tissues with self-organized rosette-like clusters of neural cells around ventricles were apparent in different CO/MCO regions (Figure 3). Within these clusters, populations of NSCs (co-expressing Nestin or SOX2 and GFAP) and NPCs (expressing Nestin or SOX2 but not GFAP) were evident (Figure 4). Various degrees of neural differentiation were identified by the presence of neuroblasts/immature neurons (DCX+ and TUJ1+; Figure 3), mature neuron (NeuN, Figure 5), astrocytes (GFAP, Figure 4), and others. A cluster (or aggregate) of dividing/proliferating NSCs/NPCs were identified by the presence of Ki67+ and PAX6+ immunoreactivity (Figure 5). These data suggest that our simplified protocol works well for the generation of CO or MCO with characteristic features of developing brain structures.
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Dynamic Development and Maturation of Microglia-Like Cells in MCOs
Only one report demonstrated the feasibility of innately developing microglia in MCO, using a spinning bioreactor culture system (Ormel et al., 2018). To validate this report, we included part of this protocol into our simplified CO culture protocol as described above. The presence of microglia-like cells was validated by immunofluorescent staining with microglia/macrophage marker IBA1 (Figure 3) as well as microglia-specific marker TMEM119 (Figure 4). These microglia-like cells began to be detectable around day 13–16, expanded dramatically at day 30–60, and matured to the characteristic ramified morphology at day 60–180 (Figures 3, 4, 6). They scattered throughout the MCO, mainly located around epithelial layers at an early stage (Figure 3) but migrated/scattered to other regions at late stages (Figures 4B, 6). Flow cytometry analysis with CD11b and P2RY12 surface markers further confirmed the existence of microglia in average of 7 ± 2% (Figure 7), consistent with the reported number of microglia (0.5–16.6%) in the human brain, which varies with the brain region and developmental stage (Lawson et al., 1992; Nikodemova et al., 2015; Bachiller et al., 2018).
Figure 6
Figure 7
Neuronal Maturation and Synaptic Network Formation in Mature MCOs
Neuronal differentiation and maturation occur instantly during the expansion and maturation of MCOs. Mature neurons with extensive synaptic networks were detectable with neuronal markers NeuN (Figure 5) and MAP2 (Figure 8) as well as the postsynaptic protein PSD95 (Figure 5C) and presynaptic axonal marker synaptophysin (Figure 8), suggesting some regions actively undergo neuronal differentiation and functional connection. Extensive expression of the glutamatergic/excitatory neuronal marker mGluR5 was detected in most regions of MCOs at day 60–80 (Figures 5A,B), while the GABAergic/inhibitory neuronal marker GAD67 was weakly expressed at this stage (Figure 5C). More detailed analysis shows evidence of synaptogenesis/neuritogenesis in mature MCOs. Neurons display robust expression of dendritic markers (MAP2) with dendritic arborization evident in some regions (Figure 8). The presynaptic axonal terminal marker (synaptophysin) was highly expressed (Figure 8), with some visible axonal-dendritic synaptic connections (white arrows). These data suggest that mature neurons present in MCOs actively form extensive neurites, enriched dendrite arborization, and functional synaptic network.
Figure 8
Discussion
Organoids have been extensively utilized to study organ developmental events and model various human diseases. However, some challenges remain, including reproducibility, predictability, scalability, cost, technical complexity, anatomical accuracy, etc. Here we design a system that simplifies the process of MCO generation from human iPSCs in an easy-to-follow and affordable protocol that can be adapted by most standard labs. Additionally, our protocol incorporates microglia to more fully recapitulate the cell types present in the brain.
There have been a great number of advances in CO technology since they were first introduced. Originally, CO generation required expensive equipment, which made it inaccessible for many labs, as well as large volumes of reagents and culture media, since spinning culture is necessary for CO to receive nutrients. Since then, protocols have simplified this process by using novel ideas to generate organoids on a smaller scale, such as the miniature spin omega bioreactor (Qian et al., 2016; Romero-Morales et al., 2019). Our protocol simply uses an orbital shaker and six-well plates in standard incubators; something that is affordable and accessible for most labs. Initial organoid protocols were also fairly complicated, involving precise technical skills such as picking iPSC colonies, generating Matrigel droplets and EB formation (Lancaster and Knoblich, 2014; Qian et al., 2016, 2018; Sloan et al., 2017; Pasca, 2018; Sutcliffe and Lancaster, 2019). Simplifying these steps may help decrease variability and increase efficiency while reducing cost and labor. Our novel protocol allows us to go directly from 2D to 3D culture, and then from 3D directly to EB culture in a six-well plate. This novel proof of concept for 3D spheres derives from previously described swirler culture for hematopoietic organoids using a bulk-cell aggregation method (Schulz et al., 2012). Our protocol also takes advantage of the newly developed mTeSR-3D suspension culture medium that allows for the expansion and scaling-up of undifferentiated human iPSCs or ESCs. The combination of these components saves time and reagents by employing a daily feeding system to replenish nutrients rather than full media changes and generates evenly distributed 3D spheres that allows direct differentiation into EBs in the same six-well plate under orbital shaking. Additionally, we adapt Qian’s method (Qian et al., 2016, 2018) of embedding multiple organoids in Matrigel in 6-well plates, which are then dissociated 4 days later for shaking culture. After this point, organoids need minimal maintenance by changing media every 3–4 days and can be continuously cultured for at least 150 days tested currently in our lab, although over 590 days for CO maintenance have been reported (Sloan et al., 2017).
Another major shortcoming of original CO modeling is the lack of diverse cell types that fully recapitulate the brain. Many studies report evidence for the presence of neurons, NSC/NPCs, and glial cells to varying degrees. However, microglial cells and endothelial cells are largely absent in original CO systems. Several protocols have been developed to co-culture iPSC-derived microglia with CO or iPSC-derived neural cells (Dos Reis et al., 2020; Fritsche et al., 2020; Hasselmann and Blurton-Jones, 2020; Tanaka and Park, 2021). While these methods are effective at generating MCOs, they require separate culturing systems with multiple additional steps as well as optimization of cell number ratio. A recent report found that simply reducing the level of heparin in the culture media during neural induction from EB could derive mesodermal microglia into the original ectodermal CO using a cost-ineffective spinning bioreactor system (Ormel et al., 2018). We combined this novel method with our direct 3D-to-EB transition technique and successfully recapitulated the generation of MCO. While microglia have traditionally been studied in the context of immune response to pathogens in the brain, they are emerging as important players in a number of neurological pathways. Importantly, microglial progenitors enter the brain very early during embryonic development and colonize among developing NSCs/NPCs (Hammond et al., 2018; Thion et al., 2018). Therefore, these microglia and neural cells differentiate and mature in close proximity to each other during development, resulting in unique cross-talk and overlapping pathways. For example, microglia have been shown to regulate the number of NSCs/NPCs as well as play roles in postnatal presynaptic pruning and synaptogenesis (Cunningham et al., 2013; Miyamoto et al., 2016; Weinhard et al., 2018). However, some of these mechanisms have not fully been explored during early neurodevelopment, but MCOs may present a unique model to study these critical interactions, particularly in the context of elucidating mechanisms underlying neurodevelopmental disorders and neurodegenerative diseases. Furthermore, as microglia are known to play critical roles in inflammation and infection, MCOs provide an excellent model for neurotropic viral infections such as HIV and ZIKV (Muffat et al., 2018; Dos Reis et al., 2020; Qiao et al., 2020; Bodnar et al., 2021). While organoids have been used to study viral infections before (Cugola et al., 2016; Dang et al., 2016; Qian et al., 2016; Gabriel et al., 2017; Li et al., 2017b; Watanabe et al., 2017), these models did not include microglia, which are critical to the immune response.
One limit of this study is the small number of microglia cells in MCO (around 7%), although it may represent the physiological development process (Lawson et al., 1992; Nikodemova et al., 2015; Bachiller et al., 2018). Optimization of the heparin concentration or other regulators may improve the generation of microglia in MCO. Another strategy might be the co-culture of iPSC-derived microglia with the CO (Dos Reis et al., 2020; Rai et al., 2020), which may increase the number of microglia cells in CO, although the process does not mimic normal brain development. Another limit of our MCO model is that there are still several cell types missing, including endothelial cells/vasculature. While vasculature is an integral part of the brain, it was initially difficult to incorporate into the organoid culture, with earlier protocols requiring the use of compartmentalized microfluidic chips for the introduction of endothelial cell co-culture (Nashimoto et al., 2017; Grebenyuk and Ranga, 2019) or even grafting cerebral organoids in vivo in mouse brains, which vascularize over time and form functional circuits (Daviaud et al., 2018; Mansour et al., 2018). However recent publications have used novel ways to incorporate endothelial cells by co-culture with mesodermal cells (Wörsdörfer et al., 2019, 2020; Shi et al., 2020) or innate induction via inducible expression of ETV2 (Cakir et al., 2019). We anticipate that some of these methods can be incorporated into our MCO protocol for future experiments and the development of a more complete model of neurodevelopment. However, the vasculature in these organoid models is not fully mature as there is no blood flow, so doing so would require either in vivo grafting into a host (Mansour et al., 2018) or incorporation of a microfluidic system (Wörsdörfer et al., 2020). Finally, it is important to note that the MCOs produced are not region-specific and therefore representative of general cerebral cortex tissue, with morphology similar to that of traditional organoid protocols (Lancaster and Knoblich, 2014). It may be possible to incorporate the microglia-promoting components of our protocol with that of region-specific protocols for more advanced organoid models/brain assembloids (Qian et al., 2018; Sloan et al., 2018; Xiang et al., 2020), but would require further optimization due to differences in neural induction and patterning techniques.
In summary, we present a novel protocol that allows for the simplified generation of cerebral organoids that contain microglia (MCO). This protocol can be readily adapted by most standard labs and scaled as needed. Additionally, immunohistochemistry and confocal image analysis shows the expression of NSCs/NPCs/neurons as well as astrocytes and microglia at various time points, showing expected characteristics of organoids/developing brain making this a viable model to use for the investigation of human brain development and pathogenesis in various diseases. By simplifying the process of generating organoids, it makes this novel and exciting tool more accessible for labs, which will ultimately help further innovations in this field in a collaborative way to generate reproducible organoids.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Author contributions
WH, YZha, QL, and W-ZH contributed to the conception and design of the study. BB, YZha, JL, YL, PW, ZW, SS, YZhu, FL, and XW conducted the experiments and acquired data. BB and WH analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. WY and YZhu generated iPSC. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
The authors declare that this study received funding from NIH/NIDA051893 (National Institute on Drug Abuse; WH and W-ZH). The funder was not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication.
Conflict of interest
A U.S provisional patent application related to this work was filed with WH as the inventor. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
- 3D
three-dimensional
- CO
cerebral organoid
- EB
embryoid body
- hESC
human embryonic stem cell
- iPSC
induced pluripotent stem cell
- MCO
microglia-containing cerebral organoid
- MEF
mouse embryonic fibroblast
- NPC
neural progenitor cell
- NSC
neural stem cell.
Abbreviations
References
1
AbudE. M.RamirezR. N.MartinezE. S.HealyL. M.NguyenC. H. H.NewmanS. A.et al. (2017). iPSC-derived human microglia-like cells to study neurological diseases. Neuron94, 278–293.e9. 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.03.042
2
AmiriA.CoppolaG.ScuderiS.WuF.RoychowdhuryT.LiuF.et al. (2018). Transcriptome and epigenome landscape of human cortical development modeled in organoids. Science362:eaat6720. 10.1126/science.aat6720
3
BachillerS.Jimenez-FerrerI.PaulusA.YangY.SwanbergM.DeierborgT.et al. (2018). Microglia in neurological diseases: a road map to brain-disease dependent-inflammatory response. Front. Cell. Neurosci.12:488. 10.3389/fncel.2018.00488
4
BagleyJ. A.ReumannD.BianS.Lévi-StraussJ.KnoblichJ. A. (2017). Fused cerebral organoids model interactions between brain regions. Nat. Methods14, 743–751. 10.1038/nmeth.4304
5
BershteynM.NowakowskiT. J.PollenA. A.Di LulloE.NeneA.Wynshaw-BorisA.et al. (2017). Human iPSC-derived cerebral organoids model cellular features of lissencephaly and reveal prolonged mitosis of outer radial glia. Cell Stem Cell20, 435–449.e4. 10.1016/j.stem.2016.12.007
6
BireyF.AndersenJ.MakinsonC. D.IslamS.WeiW.HuberN.et al. (2017). Assembly of functionally integrated human forebrain spheroids. Nature545, 54–59. 10.1038/nature22330
7
BodnarB.PatelK.HoW.LuoJ. J.HuW. (2021). Cellular mechanisms underlying neurological/neuropsychiatric manifestations of COVID-19. J. Med. Virol.93, 1983–1998. 10.1002/jmv.26720
8
CakirB.XiangY.TanakaY.KuralM. H.ParentM.KangY. J.et al. (2019). Engineering of human brain organoids with a functional vascular-like system. Nat. Methods16, 1169–1175. 10.1038/s41592-019-0586-5
9
ChailangkarnT.TrujilloC. A.FreitasB. C.Hrvoj-MihicB.HeraiR. H.YuD. X.et al. (2016). A human neurodevelopmental model for williams syndrome. Nature536, 338–343. 10.1038/nature19067
10
CugolaF. R.FernandesI. R.RussoF. B.FreitasB. C.DiasJ. L. M.GuimarãesK. P.et al. (2016). The Brazilian Zika virus strain causes birth defects in experimental models. Nature534, 267–271. 10.1038/nature18296
11
CunninghamC. L.Martínez-CerdeñoV.NoctorS. C. (2013). Microglia regulate the number of neural precursor cells in the developing cerebral cortex. J. Neurosci.33, 4216–4233. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3441-12.2013
12
DangJ.TiwariS. K.LichinchiG.QinY.PatilV. S.EroshkinA. M.et al. (2016). Zika virus depletes neural progenitors in human cerebral organoids through activation of the innate immune receptor TLR3. Cell Stem Cell19, 258–265. 10.1016/j.stem.2016.04.014
13
DaviaudN.FriedelR. H.ZouH. (2018). Vascularization and engraftment of transplanted human cerebral organoids in mouse cortex. eneuro5:ENEURO.0219-18.2018. 10.1523/ENEURO.0219-18.2018
14
De VrijF. M. S.BouwkampC. G.GunhanlarN.ShpakG.LendemeijerB.BaghdadiM.et al. (2019). Candidate CSPG4 mutations and induced pluripotent stem cell modeling implicate oligodendrocyte progenitor cell dysfunction in familial schizophrenia. Mol. Psychiatry24, 757–771. 10.1038/s41380-017-0004-2
15
Dos ReisR. S.SantS.KeeneyH.WagnerM. C. E.AyyavooV. (2020). Modeling HIV-1 neuropathogenesis using three-dimensional human brain organoids (hBORGs) with HIV-1 infected microglia. Sci. Rep.10:15209. 10.1038/s41598-020-72214-0
16
DouvarasP.SunB.WangM.KruglikovI.LallosG.ZimmerM.et al. (2017). Directed differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells to microglia. Stem Cell Rep.8, 1516–1524. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.04.023
17
FiddesI. T.LodewijkG. A.MooringM.BosworthC. M.EwingA. D.MantalasG. L.et al. (2018). Human-specific NOTCH2NL genes affect notch signaling and cortical neurogenesis. Cell173, 1356–1369.e22. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.051
18
FritscheE.TiggesJ.HartmannJ.KaprJ.SerafiniM. M.VivianiB.et al. (2020). Neural in vitro models for studying substances acting on the central nervous system. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol.265, 111–141. 10.1007/164_2020_367
19
GabrielE.RamaniA.KarowU.GottardoM.NatarajanK.GooiL. M.et al. (2017). Recent zika virus isolates induce premature differentiation of neural progenitors in human brain organoids. Cell Stem Cell20, 397–406.e5. 10.1016/j.stem.2016.12.005
20
Garcia-ReitboeckP.PhillipsA.PiersT. M.Villegas-LlerenaC.ButlerM.MallachA.et al. (2018). Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived microglia-like cells harboring TREM2 missense mutations show specific deficits in phagocytosis. Cell Rep.24, 2300–2311. 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.07.094
21
GouderL.VitracA.Goubran-BotrosH.DanckaertA.TinevezJ.-Y.André-LerouxG.et al. (2019). Altered spinogenesis in iPSC-derived cortical neurons from patients with autism carrying de novo SHANK3 mutations. Sci. Rep.9, 94–94. 10.1038/s41598-018-36993-x
22
GrebenyukS.RangaA. (2019). Engineering organoid vascularization. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.7, 39–39. 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00039
23
HaenselerW.SansomS. N.BuchrieserJ.NeweyS. E.MooreC. S.NichollsF. J.et al. (2017). A highly efficient human pluripotent stem cell microglia model displays a neuronal-co-culture-specific expression profile and inflammatory response. Stem Cell Rep.8, 1727–1742. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.05.017
24
HammondT. R.RobintonD.StevensB. (2018). Microglia and the brain: complementary partners in development and disease. Annu. Rev. Cell Develop. Biol.34, 523–544. 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100616-060509
25
HasselmannJ.Blurton-JonesM. (2020). Human iPSC-derived microglia: a growing toolset to study the brain’s innate immune cells. Glia68, 721–739. 10.1002/glia.23781
26
HolmesD. B.HeineV. M. (2017). Streamlined 3D cerebellar differentiation protocol with optional 2D modification. J. Vis. Exp.2017, 1–12. 10.3791/56888
27
IefremovaV.ManikakisG.KrefftO.JabaliA.WeynansK.WilkensR.et al. (2017). An organoid-based model of cortical development identifies non-cell-autonomous defects in wnt signaling contributing to miller-dieker syndrome. Cell Rep.19, 50–59. 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.03.047
28
JacobF.PatherS. R.HuangW.-K.ZhangF.WongS. Z. H.ZhouH.et al. (2020). Human pluripotent stem cell-derived neural cells and brain organoids reveal SARS-CoV-2 neurotropism predominates in choroid plexus epithelium. Cell Stem Cell27, 1–14. 10.1016/j.stem.2020.09.016
29
JoJ.XiaoY.SunA. X.CukurogluE.TranH.-D.GökeJ.et al. (2016). Midbrain-like organoids from human pluripotent stem cells contain functional dopaminergic and neuromelanin-producing neurons. Cell Stem Cell19, 248–257. 10.1016/j.stem.2016.07.005
30
KarzbrunE.KshirsagarA.CohenS. R.HannaJ. H.ReinerO. (2018). Human brain organoids on a chip reveal the physics of folding. Nat. Phys.14, 515–522. 10.1038/s41567-018-0046-7
31
KasaiT.SugaH.SakakibaraM.OzoneC.MatsumotoR.KanoM.et al. (2020). Hypothalamic contribution to pituitary functions is recapitulated in vitro using 3D-cultured human iPS cells. Cell Rep.30, 18–24.e5. 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.12.009
32
KathuriaA.Lopez-LengowskiK.JagtapS. S.McphieD. L.PerlisR. H.CohenB. M.et al. (2020). Transcriptomic landscape and functional characterization of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cerebral organoids in schizophrenia. JAMA Psychiatry77, 745–745. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.0196
33
KrefftO.JabaliA.IefremovaV.KochP.LadewigJ. (2018). Generation of standardized and reproducible forebrain-type cerebral organoids from human induced pluripotent stem cells. J. Vis. Exp131:56768. 10.3791/56768
34
LancasterM. A.KnoblichJ. A. (2014). Generation of cerebral organoids from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Protocol.9, 2329–2340. 10.1038/nprot.2014.158
35
LancasterM. A.RennerM.MartinC.-A.WenzelD.BicknellL. S.HurlesM. E.et al. (2013). Cerebral organoids model human brain development and microcephaly. Nature501, 373–379. 10.1038/nature12517
36
LawsonL. J.PerryV. H.GordonS. (1992). Turnover of resident microglia in the normal adult mouse brain. Neuroscience48, 405–415. 10.1016/0306-4522(92)90500-2
37
LiR.SunL.FangA.LiP.WuQ.WangX.et al. (2017a). Recapitulating cortical development with organoid culture in vitro and modeling abnormal spindle-like (ASPM related primary) microcephaly disease. Protein Cell8, 823–833. 10.1007/s13238-017-0479-2
38
LiY.MuffatJ.OmerA.BoschI.LancasterM. A.SurM.et al. (2017b). Induction of expansion and folding in human cerebral organoids. Cell Stem Cell20, 385–396.e383. 10.1016/j.stem.2016.11.017
39
MansourA. A.GonçalvesJ. T.BloydC. W.LiH.FernandesS.QuangD.et al. (2018). An in vivo model of functional and vascularized human brain organoids. Nat. Biotechnol.36, 432–441. 10.1038/nbt.4127
40
MarianiJ.CoppolaG.ZhangP.AbyzovA.ProviniL.TomasiniL.et al. (2015). FOXG1-dependent dysregulation of GABA/glutamate neuron differentiation in autism spectrum disorders. Cell162, 375–390. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.06.034
41
MatsumotoR.SugaH.AoiT.BandoH.FukuokaH.IguchiG.et al. (2020). Congenital pituitary hypoplasia model demonstrates hypothalamic OTX2 regulation of pituitary progenitor cells. J. Clin. Invest.130, 641–654. 10.1172/JCI127378
42
MelliosN.FeldmanD. A.SheridanS. D.IpJ. P. K.KwokS.AmoahS. K.et al. (2018). MeCP2-regulated miRNAs control early human neurogenesis through differential effects on ERK and AKT signaling. Mol. Psychiatry23, 1051–1065. 10.1038/mp.2017.86
43
MiyamotoA.WakeH.IshikawaA. W.EtoK.ShibataK.MurakoshiH.et al. (2016). Microglia contact induces synapse formation in developing somatosensory cortex. Nat. Commun.7:12540. 10.1038/ncomms12540
44
MonzelA. S.SmitsL. M.HemmerK.HachiS.MorenoE. L.Van WuellenT.et al. (2017). Derivation of human midbrain-specific organoids from neuroepithelial stem cells. Stem Cell Rep.8, 1144–1154. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.03.010
45
MuffatJ.LiY.OmerA.DurbinA.BoschI.BakiasiG.et al. (2018). Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived glial cells and neural progenitors display divergent responses to Zika and dengue infections. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A115, 7117–7122. 10.1073/pnas.1719266115
46
MuffatJ.LiY.YuanB.MitalipovaM.OmerA.CorcoranS.et al. (2016). Efficient derivation of microglia-like cells from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Med.22, 1358–1367. 10.1038/nm.4189
47
MugurumaK.NishiyamaA.KawakamiH.HashimotoK.SasaiY. (2015). Self-organization of polarized cerebellar tissue in 3D culture of human pluripotent stem cells. Cell Rep.10, 537–550. 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.12.051
48
NashimotoY.HayashiT.KunitaI.NakamasuA.TorisawaY. S.NakayamaM.et al. (2017). Integrating perfusable vascular networks with a three-dimensional tissue in a microfluidic device. Integr. Biol. (Camb)9, 506–518. 10.1039/c7ib00024c
49
NikodemovaM.KimyonR. S.DeI.SmallA. L.CollierL. S.WattersJ. J.et al. (2015). Microglial numbers attain adult levels after undergoing a rapid decrease in cell number in the third postnatal week. J. Neuroimmunol.278, 280–288. 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2014.11.018
50
OgawaK.SugaH.OzoneC.SakakibaraM.YamadaT.KanoM.et al. (2018). Vasopressin-secreting neurons derived from human embryonic stem cells through specific induction of dorsal hypothalamic progenitors. Sci. Rep.8:3615. 10.1038/s41598-018-22053-x
51
OrmelP. R.Vieira De SáR.Van BodegravenE. J.KarstH.HarschnitzO.SneeboerM. A. M.et al. (2018). Microglia innately develop within cerebral organoids. Nat. Commun.9:4167. 10.1038/s41467-018-06684-2
52
PascaS. P. (2018). Building three-dimensional human brain organoids. Nat. Neurosci.10.1038/s41593-018-0107-3 [Online ahead of print].
53
PellegriniL.AlbeckaA.MalleryD. L.KellnerM. J.PaulD.CarterA. P.et al. (2020a). SARS-CoV-2 infects the brain choroid plexus and disrupts the blood-CSF barrier in human brain organoids. Cell Stem Cell1:11. 10.1016/j.stem.2020.10.001
54
PellegriniL.BonfioC.ChadwickJ.BegumF.SkehelM.LancasterM. A.et al. (2020b). Human CNS barrier-forming organoids with cerebrospinal fluid production. Science369:eaaz5626. 10.1126/science.aaz5626
55
QianX.JacobF.SongM. M.NguyenH. N.SongH.MingG.-L.et al. (2018). Generation of human brain region-specific organoids using a miniaturized spinning bioreactor. Nat. Protocol.13, 565–580. 10.1038/nprot.2017.152
56
QianX.NguyenH. N.SongM. M.HadionoC.OgdenS. C.HammackC.et al. (2016). Brain-region-specific organoids using mini-bioreactors for modeling ZIKV exposure. Cell165, 1238–1254. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.032
57
QiaoH.GuoM.ShangJ.ZhaoW.WangZ.LiuN.et al. (2020). Herpes simplex virus type 1 infection leads to neurodevelopmental disorder-associated neuropathological changes. PLoS Pathog.16:e1008899. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008899
58
QuadratoG.NguyenT.MacoskoE. Z.SherwoodJ. L.Min YangS.BergerD. R.et al. (2017). Cell diversity and network dynamics in photosensitive human brain organoids. Nature545, 48–53. 10.1038/nature22047
59
RaiM. A.HammondsJ.PujatoM.MayhewC.RoskinK.SpearmanP.et al. (2020). Comparative analysis of human microglial models for studies of HIV replication and pathogenesis. Retrovirology17:35. 10.1186/s12977-020-00544-y
60
RamaniA.MüllerL.OstermannP. N.GabrielE.Abida-IslamP.Müller-SchiffmannA.et al. (2020). SARS-CoV-2 targets neurons of 3D human brain organoids. EMBO J.39:e106230. 10.15252/embj.2020106230
61
Romero-MoralesA. I.O’gradyB. J.BalotinK. M.BellanL. M.LippmannE. S.GamaV.et al. (2019). Spininfinity: an updated miniaturized spinning bioreactor design for the generation of human cerebral organoids from pluripotent stem cells. HardwareX6:e00084. 10.1016/j.ohx.2019.e00084
62
SakaguchiH.KadoshimaT.SoenM.NariiN.IshidaY.OhgushiM.et al. (2015). Generation of functional hippocampal neurons from self-organizing human embryonic stem cell-derived dorsomedial telencephalic tissue. Nat. Commun.6:8896. 10.1038/ncomms9896
63
SchulzT. C.YoungH. Y.AgulnickA. D.BabinM. J.BaetgeE. E.BangA. G.et al. (2012). A scalable system for production of functional pancreatic progenitors from human embryonic stem cells. PLoS One7:e37004. 10.1371/journal.pone.0037004
64
SchwartzM. P.HouZ.PropsonN. E.ZhangJ.EngstromC. J.CostaV. S.et al. (2015). Human pluripotent stem cell-derived neural constructs for predicting neural toxicity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A112, 12516–12521. 10.1073/pnas.1516645112
65
ShiY.SunL.WangM.LiuJ.ZhongS.LiR.et al. (2020). Vascularized human cortical organoids (vOrganoids) model cortical development in vivo. PLoS Biol.18:e3000705. 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000705
66
SloanS. A.AndersenJ.PaşcaA. M.BireyF.PaşcaS. P. (2018). Generation and assembly of human brain region-specific three-dimensional cultures. Nat. Protocol.13, 2062–2085. 10.1038/s41596-018-0032-7
67
SloanS. A.DarmanisS.HuberN.KhanT. A.BireyF.CanedaC.et al. (2017). Human astrocyte maturation captured in 3D cerebral cortical spheroids derived from pluripotent stem cells. Neuron95, 779–790.e6. 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.07.035
68
SongL.YuanX.JonesZ.ViedC.MiaoY.MarzanoM.et al. (2019). Functionalization of brain region-specific spheroids with isogenic microglia-like cells. Sci. Rep.9:11055. 10.1038/s41598-019-47444-6
69
SrikanthP.HanK.CallahanD. G.MakovkinaE.MuratoreC. R.LalliM. A.et al. (2015). Genomic DISC1 disruption in hiPSCs alters wnt signaling and neural cell fate. Cell Rep.12, 1414–1429. 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.07.061
70
StachowiakE. K.BensonC. A.NarlaS. T.DimitriA.Bayona ChuyeL. E.DhimanS.et al. (2017). Cerebral organoids reveal early cortical maldevelopment in schizophrenia—computational anatomy and genomics, role of FGFR1. Trans. Psychiatry7:6. 10.1038/s41398-017-0054-x
71
SugaH.KadoshimaT.MinaguchiM.OhgushiM.SoenM.NakanoT.et al. (2011). Self-formation of functional adenohypophysis in three-dimensional culture. Nature480, 57–62. 10.1038/nature10637
72
SunA. X.YuanQ.FukudaM.YuW.YanH.LimG. G. Y.et al. (2019). Potassium channel dysfunction in human neuronal models of Angelman syndrome. Science366, 1486–1492. 10.1126/science.aav5386
73
SutcliffeM.LancasterM. A. (2019). A simple method of generating 3D brain organoids using standard laboratory equipment. Methods Mol. Biol.1576, 1–12. 10.1007/7651_2017_2
74
TanakaY.ParkI. H. (2021). Regional specification and complementation with non-neuroectodermal cells in human brain organoids. J. Mol. Med. (Berl)99, 489–500. 10.1007/s00109-021-02051-9
75
ThionM. S.GinhouxF.GarelS. (2018). Microglia and early brain development: an intimate journey. Science362, 185–189. 10.1126/science.aat0474
76
VelascoS.KedaigleA. J.SimmonsS. K.NashA.RochaM.QuadratoG.et al. (2019). Individual brain organoids reproducibly form cell diversity of the human cerebral cortex. Nature570, 523–527. 10.1038/s41586-019-1289-x
77
WangP.MokhtariR.PedrosaE.KirschenbaumM.BayrakC.ZhengD.et al. (2017). CRISPR/Cas9-mediated heterozygous knockout of the autism gene CHD8 and characterization of its transcriptional networks in cerebral organoids derived from iPS cells. Mol. Autism8:11. 10.1186/s13229-017-0124-1
78
WatanabeM.ButhJ. E.VishlaghiN.De La Torre-UbietaL.TaxidisJ.KhakhB. S.et al. (2017). Self-organized cerebral organoids with human-specific features predict effective drugs to combat zika virus infection. Cell Rep.21, 517–532. 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.047
79
WatsonL. M.WongM. M. K.VowlesJ.CowleyS. A.BeckerE. B. E. (2018). A simplified method for generating purkinje cells from human-induced pluripotent stem cells. Cerebellum17, 419–427. 10.1007/s12311-017-0913-2
80
WeinhardL.Di BartolomeiG.BolascoG.MachadoP.SchieberN. L.NeniskyteU.et al. (2018). Microglia remodel synapses by presynaptic trogocytosis and spine head filopodia induction. Nat. Commun.9:1228. 10.1038/s41467-018-03566-5
81
WörsdörferP.DaldaN.KernA.KrügerS.WagnerN.KwokC. K.et al. (2019). Generation of complex human organoid models including vascular networks by incorporation of mesodermal progenitor cells. Sci. Rep.9:15663. 10.1038/s41598-019-52204-7
82
WörsdörferP.RockelA.AltY.KernA.ErgünS. (2020). Generation of vascularized neural organoids by co-culturing with mesodermal progenitor cells. STAR Protocol.1:100041. 10.1016/j.xpro.2020.100041
83
XiangY.CakirB.ParkI.-H. (2020). Generation of regionally specified human brain organoids resembling thalamus development. STAR Protocol1:100001. 10.1016/j.xpro.2019.100001
84
XiangY.TanakaY.CakirB.PattersonB.KimK.-Y.SunP.et al. (2019). hESC-derived thalamic organoids form reciprocal projections when fused with cortical organoids. Cell Stem Cell24, 487–497. 10.1016/j.stem.2018.12.015
85
XiangY.TanakaY.PattersonB.KangY.-J.GovindaiahG.RoselaarN.et al. (2017). Fusion of regionally specified hpsc-derived organoids models human brain development and interneuron migration. Cell Stem Cell21, 383–398.e7. 10.1016/j.stem.2017.07.007
86
XiangY.YoshiakiT.PattersonB.CakirB.KimK.-Y.ChoY. S.et al. (2018). Generation and fusion of human cortical and medial ganglionic eminence brain organoids. Curr. Protoc. Stem Cell Biol.47:e61. 10.1002/cpsc.61
87
YakoubA. M.SadekM. (2018). Development and characterization of human cerebral organoids: an optimized protocol. Cell Transplant.27, 393–406. 10.1177/0963689717752946
88
YangL.HanY.Nilsson-PayantB. E.GuptaV.WangP.DuanX.et al. (2020). A human pluripotent stem cell-based platform to study SARS-CoV-2 tropism and model virus infection in human cells and organoids. Cell Stem Cell27, 125–136.e7. 10.1016/j.stem.2020.06.015
89
YeF.KangE.YuC.QianX.JacobF.YuC.et al. (2017). DISC1 regulates neurogenesis via modulating kinetochore attachment of Ndel1/Nde1 during mitosis. Neuron96, 1041–1054.e5. 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.10.010
90
ZhangB.-Z.ChuH.HanS.ShuaiH.DengJ.HuY.-F.et al. (2020). SARS-CoV-2 infects human neural progenitor cells and brain organoids. Cell Res.30, 928–931. 10.1038/s41422-020-0390-x
91
ZhangW.YangS.-L.YangM.HerrlingerS.ShaoQ.CollarJ. L.et al. (2019). Modeling microcephaly with cerebral organoids reveals a WDR62-CEP170-KIF2A pathway promoting cilium disassembly in neural progenitors. Nat. Commun.10:2612. 10.1038/s41467-019-10497-2
Summary
Keywords
cerebral organoids, microglia-containing cerebral organoids, induced pluripotent stem cells, neural induction, human brain development
Citation
Bodnar B, Zhang Y, Liu J, Lin Y, Wang P, Wei Z, Saribas S, Zhu Y, Li F, Wang X, Yang W, Li Q, Ho W-Z and Hu W (2021) Novel Scalable and Simplified System to Generate Microglia-Containing Cerebral Organoids From Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 15:682272. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2021.682272
Received
18 March 2021
Accepted
07 May 2021
Published
05 July 2021
Volume
15 - 2021
Edited by
Junfang Wu, University of Maryland School of Medicine, United States
Reviewed by
Susmita Sil, University of Nebraska Medical Center, United States; Haiyun Xu, Wenzhou Medical University, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Bodnar, Zhang, Liu, Lin, Wang, Wei, Saribas, Zhu, Li, Wang, Yang, Li, Ho and Hu.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Wenhui Hu whu@temple.edu Wen-Zhe Ho wenzheho@temple.edu
†These authors have contributed equally to this work
Specialty section: This article was submitted to Cellular Neuropathology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.