Abstract
Since its discovery, spike timing-dependent synaptic plasticity (STDP) has been thought to be a primary mechanism underlying the brain’s ability to learn and to form new memories. However, despite the enormous interest in both the experimental and theoretical neuroscience communities in activity-dependent plasticity, it is still unclear whether plasticity rules inferred from in vitro experiments apply to in vivo conditions. Among the multiple reasons why plasticity rules in vivo might differ significantly from in vitro studies is that extracellular calcium concentration use in most studies is higher than concentrations estimated in vivo. STDP, like many forms of long-term synaptic plasticity, strongly depends on intracellular calcium influx for its induction. Here, we discuss the importance of considering physiological levels of extracellular calcium concentration to study functional plasticity.
Introduction
Spike timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) is a form of long-term synaptic modification thought to constitute a mechanism underlying formation of new memories. The polarity of synaptic modifications is controlled by the relative timing between pre- and post-synaptic action potentials (APs; Dan and Poo, ; Feldman, ). Following the Konorski-Hebb principle (Konorski, ; Hebb, ), timing-dependent long-term synaptic potentiation (t-LTP) in hippocampal and neocortical pyramidal neurons, results from the temporal conjunction of synaptic activity followed by one or more backpropagating APs in the post-synaptic cell (Gustafsson and Wigström, ; Markram et al., ; Bi and Poo, ; Debanne et al., ; Feldman, ). In contrast, following Stent principle (Stent, ), timing-dependent synaptic depression (t-LTD) is induced when synaptic activity is repeatedly preceded by one of more backpropagating action potentials (Debanne et al., , , ; Markram et al., ; Bi and Poo, ; Feldman, ). It is important to note that t-LTP and t-LTD have been reported in early studies when two synaptic inputs, namely a weak input producing a subthreshold response and a strong input producing an action potential were paired with positive or negative delays (Baranyi and Fehér, ; Levy and Steward, ; Stanton and Sejnowski, ).
STDP and Calcium
At excitatory synapses, the amplitude of post-synaptic calcium influx determines the orientation of plasticity towards synaptic potentiation or depression (Artola et al., ). The better demonstration for that is provided by the fact that buffering post-synaptic calcium with BAPTA prevents the induction of both LTP and LTD (Debanne et al., ; Nevian and Sakmann, ). In a similar way, uncaging of calcium in CA1 pyramidal cells selectively induces LTP or LTD depending on the magnitude of calcium influx (Yang et al., ). In Hebbian STDP, the correlation between an EPSP and the backpropagated action potential (bAP) corresponding to a pre-before-post pairing that leads to t-LTP, induces large calcium entry (Koester and Sakmann, ). In contrast, post-before-pre pairing that induces t-LTD, comparatively produces a weaker calcium entry (Koester and Sakmann, ). Induction of t-LTP involves several mechanisms: (1) removal of the magnesium block from the NMDA receptor (Kampa et al., ); (2) inactivation of A-type current and activation of sodium channels to improve signal propagation (Hoffman et al., ; Stuart and Häusser, ); and (3) AMPA receptor depolarization to boost NMDA receptor calcium signal (Fuenzalida et al., ; Holbro et al., ). However, the NMDA receptor is the major player as its blockade (by perfusion of MK801 in the post-synaptic neuron for example) prevents LTP induction. Expression of t-LTP requires kinases activation such as CaMKII to phosphorylate AMPA and NMDA receptors thereby increasing their conductance (Otmakhova et al., ; Lisman et al., ) as well as the insertion of new AMPA receptors (Malinow and Malenka, ). In t-LTD, low calcium entry leads to inactivation of NMDA receptors by activation of phosphatases (Rosenmund et al., ). These two forms of plasticity which are dependent on post-synaptic NMDA receptors are found in the hippocampus at CA3-CA1 synapses of rodents (Nishiyama et al., ; Andrade-Talavera et al., ) or in the layer II/III of the cortex of rodents (Froemke et al., ). Some forms of LTD are also dependent on the presynaptic NMDA receptor. In the cortex or hippocampus, perfusion of MK801 in the pre-synaptic neurons prevents LTD but not LTP (Sjöström et al., ; Rodríguez-Moreno and Paulsen, ; Banerjee et al., ; Andrade-Talavera et al., ). Other forms of NMDA receptor-independent LTD expressed at hippocampal CA3-CA1 and cortical L4-L2/3 synapses, requires metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs), voltage-dependent calcium channels, cannabinoid receptors and astrocytic signaling (Normann et al., ; Bender, ). In these forms of LTD, production of a retrograde messenger, the endocannabinoids (eCBs), will decrease the probability of pre-synaptic release (Bender, ; Chevaleyre et al., ). However, this simplistic view is now challenged by several studies that do not necessarily observe a correlation between calcium entry and plasticity. In layer II/III of the cortex, the same rise in post-synaptic calcium can lead to LTP or LTD (Nevian and Sakmann, ) and a broadening of the action potential that induce a larger calcium influx may surprisingly facilitate LTD (Zhou et al., ).
NMDA Spikes
STDP relies heavily on the bAP which cannot propagate too deeply into the dendritic tree (Spruston, ). As a result, distal synapses require a local source of depolarization for t-LTP. Thus, dendritic NMDA receptors are an important source of calcium (Schiller and Schiller, ). Several studies have now shown that they are necessary for the induction of t-LTP. In the hippocampus, at mossy fibers-CA3 synapses, t-LTP can only be induced when NMDA spikes are triggered (Brandalise et al., ). In the cortex, at layer II/III-V distal synapses, dendritic depolarization can switch plasticity between LTD and LTP (Sjöström and Häusser, ). In addition, distal synapses can be cooperative. In CA1 pyramidal cells, synaptic cooperativity is observed at distal but not proximal dendritic locations following repetitive subthreshold activation of small spine clusters (Weber et al., ). Recently, in layer 5 pyramidal neurons, it was shown that synaptic cooperativity disrupts t-LTD and extends the temporal window for the induction of t-LTP (Tazerart et al., ).
Mathematical Models of STDP Based on Calcium
Synaptic plasticity models have been first theorized by John Lisman in 1989. According to this pioneering work, high post-synaptic calcium influx represents a condition favorable to LTP induction because protein kinases are preferentially activated whereas low to moderate calcium influx induces LTD because protein phosphatases are selectively activated. Most recent mathematical models of STDP incorporate the biochemical pathways described above to link post-synaptic calcium and plasticity (Karmarkar and Buonomano, ; Shouval et al., ; Graupner and Brunel, ). One of the first models to investigate the role of extracellular calcium in STDP was the one developed by Graupner and Brunel (). By variation of the extracellular calcium, and therefore postsynaptic calcium entry, they showed that a multitude of STDP curves could be obtained in response to a simple pre-post (1:1) or post-pre protocol (1:1; Figure 1). In the most extreme cases, only LTD or LTP could be observed respectively for a very weak or very strong calcium influx. For intermediate influx, the classical curve was found with a window of t-LTD (Δt ≤ 0 ms), a window of t-LTP (Δt ≥ 0 ms) and sometimes a second window of depression for longer delays (Δt = 20–30 ms). The concentration of extracellular calcium is consequently important for the orientation of plasticity but also for its maintenance. Time scales of memory maintenance can be extended by lowering extracellular calcium concentration to in vivo levels (Higgins et al., ). Spontaneous synaptic activity is known to erase memory induced by STDP in the tadpole visual system (Zhou et al., ). Similar behavior has been reproduced in silico with a calcium-based model (Higgins et al., ). In the presence of background synaptic noise, synaptic changes induced by STDP disappear in a few minutes with a high concentration of calcium, whereas they last 1 hour with a physiological concentration.
Figure 1
Role of External Calcium Level
Most, if not all, in vitro studies of STDP have used non-physiological extracellular calcium concentrations ([Ca2+]e), commonly between 2 and 3 mM (Table 1). But physiological [Ca2+]e is about 2 to 3 times lower, i.e., ranging from 1.3–1.8 mM in young rodent (Jones and Keep, ; Silver and Erecińska, ; Ding et al., ). In fact, past studies already showed discrepancies regarding STDP induced in vitro. The same protocol in the hippocampus could lead to a radically different STDP curve (Wittenberg and Wang, ; Campanac and Debanne, ) and the only obvious difference was the concentration of extracellular calcium used (2 vs. 3 mM). Recently, it has been confirmed experimentally that the overall calcium concentration has a significant effect on plasticity (Inglebert et al., ). At CA3-CA1 synapses, while the Ca2+/Mg2+ ratio is kept unchanged, Hebbian STDP is found for [Ca2+]e = 3 mM while no plasticity is observed for [Ca2+]e = 1.3 mM and only LTD for positive and negative timing for [Ca2+]e = 1.8 mM (Figure 2). But adjusting the protocol by increasing the pairing frequency from 0.3 to 5–10 Hz, or the number of postsynaptic APs from 1 to 3–4, allows to restore classical Hebbian STDP (Inglebert et al., ). These results obtained in young animals need to be confirmed by further studies in the adult and encourage a reexamination of STDP under physiological conditions.
Table 1
| Reference | Synapses | Induction protocol | Plasticity observed | [Ca2+]e |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debanne et al. () | CA3-CA1 | 50–100 pairings @ 0.3 Hz + Postsynaptic burst | LTD (Δt < 0 ms) | 2.8 mM |
| Bi and Poo () | Hippocampal | 60 pairings @ 1 Hz + Postsynaptic depolarization | LTP (Δt > 0 ms) and LTD (Δt < 0 ms) | 3 mM |
| neurons | ||||
| Markram et al. () | L5-L5 | 10 pairings @ 20 Hz (2:2 or 5:5 or 10:10) | LTP (Δt > 0 ms) | 2 mM |
| Sjöström et al. () | L5-L5 | 15 pairings @ 40 Hz (1:5) | LTP (Δt > 0 ms) | 2.5 mM |
| Froemke et al. () | L2/3 | 60–100 pairings @ 0.2 Hz (1:1) | LTP (Δt > 0 ms) and LTD (Δt < 0 ms | 2.5 mM |
| Froemke et al. () | L2/3 | 30–40 pairings @ 0.2 Hz (5:5) | No Plasticity, LTD or LTP depending on burst frequency | 2.5 mM |
| Wittenberg and Wang () | CA3-CA1 | 70–100 pairings @ 0.1–0.5 Hz (1 :1) | LTD only (Δt > 0 ms and Δt < 0 ms) | 2 mM |
| Wittenberg and Wang () | CA3-CA1 | 100 pairings @ 5 Hz (1:2) | LTD (Δt < 0 ms) and LTP (Δt > 0 ms) | 2 mM |
| Nishiyama et al. () | CA3-CA1 | Train of stimuli at 5 Hz + postsynaptic Spike | LTP (Δt > 0 ms) and LTD (Δt < 0 ms)* | 2–2.6 mM |
| Campanac and Debanne () | CA3-CA1 | 100 pairings @ 0.3 Hz for LTP | LTD (Δt < 0 ms) and LTP (Δt > 0 ms) | 3 mM |
| 150 pairings @ 0.3 Hz for LTD (1:1) | ||||
| Pawlak and Kerr (2008) | Corticostriatal | 60 pairings @ 0.1 Hz (1:1) | LTD (Δt < 0 ms) and LTP (Δt > 0 ms) | 2.5 mM |
| pathway | ||||
| Mishra et al. () | CA3-CA3 | 300 pairings @ 1 Hz (1:1) | LTP only (Δt > 0 ms and Δt < 0 ms) | 2 mM |
| Inglebert et al. () | CA3-CA1 | 100 pairings @ 0.3 Hz for LTP | No Plasticity or LTD only | 1.3–1.8 mM |
| 150 pairing @ 0.3 Hz for LTD (1:1) |
Selected publications on Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity.
This table summarizes the plasticity observed in several studies as a function of extracellular calcium concentration. The brain region studied and the induction protocol used are also indicated. The number of repetitions, the pairing frequency and number of pre/post stimulation are specified. For example, 5:5 indicates five presynaptic and five postsynaptic stimulations. *A second LTD window is visible around Δt = 20 ms. STDP, Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity.
Figure 2
Reevaluation of STDP Rules
Multiple STDP Rules
The findings of Inglebert et al. invite a reexamination of plasticity at many synapses. For example, at CA3-CA3 synapses where only LTP is observed (Mishra et al., ), it is likely that this would not be the same in physiological calcium. Hebbian STDP (t-LTP for positive timings and t-LTD for negative timings) is found predominantly at excitatory synapses. Despite being ubiquitous, STDP curve can take many different shapes. Anti-Hebbian STDP (t-LTP for negative timings or t-LTD for positive timings) is found largely at inhibitory synapses. In particular, the striatum, which is composed principally of inhibitory neurons, has many different STDP curves depending on the neuron considered (Fino and Venance, ). For example, interneurons that expressed Nitric Oxide synthase, present a window of LTP for a positive timing around Δt = +50 ms. In the dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN), pre-before-post protocol induced LTD in cartwheel cells (Tzounopoulos et al., ). Would all these results persist in physiological calcium or plasticity has been overestimated?
Dendritic Calcium Spikes in Physiological Calcium
Among the factors that could be potentially affected by physiological calcium, the occurrence of dendritic calcium spikes or NMDA spikes that have been shown to be critical in LTP induction (Kampa et al., ; Brandalise et al., ) could be greatly reduced. A possibility is that in physiological calcium, a larger number of synaptic inputs would be required to trigger an NMDA spike. Alternatively, the spatial extent of the NMDA spike could be reduced in physiological calcium rending induction of plasticity more difficult. Further studies will be required to test these possibilities.
Calcium Micro-Domains in Physiological Calcium
Calcium micro-domains are supposed to play a critical role in STDP (Mihalas, ). A major consequence of reducing external calcium concentration to physiological values is a great reduction of the size of calcium micro-domains. As a consequence, the calcium-sensitive effector might be disconnected from the source of calcium, thus accounting for the observed reduction in plasticity (Inglebert et al., ). Additional studies will be, however, required to test further these hypotheses.
Presynaptic Aspects of STDP in Physiological Calcium
Neocortical STDP relies heavily on presynaptic glutamate release and presynaptic firing rate (Markram et al., ; Sjöström et al., , ). However, it is now clear that spontaneously released vesicles and evoked transmission use distinct mechanisms (Kavalali, ; Abrahamsson et al., ). Therefore, physiological calcium could have distinct consequences on evoked and spontaneous release. At many synapses, evoked glutamate release is controlled by pre-synaptic Ca2+ entry through voltage-dependent calcium channels (VDCC) and [Ca2+]e (Südhof, ). Reduced [Ca2+]e is associated with decreased synaptic transmission (Borst and Sakmann, ; Debanne et al., ; Hardingham et al., ). On the contrary, spontaneous release is poorly sensitive to fluctuations in [Ca2+]e and is not triggered by Ca2+ entry via VDCC (Scanziani et al., ; Vyleta and Smith, ). Interestingly, neocortical presynaptic NMDA receptors regulate both spontaneous and evoked release by distinct molecular pathways (Abrahamsson et al., ; Bouvier et al., ), are required for neocortical t-LTD (Sjöström et al., ) and for hippocampal t-LTD (Andrade-Talavera et al., ). The work of Inglebert et al. () focused on the post-synaptic calcium hypothesis but further studies are needed to explore pre-synaptic long-term plasticity.
Towards Standardization of Induction Protocols
All studies use different protocols (Table 1). The number of repetitions, the pairing frequency, the somato-dendritic distance of the inputs or the number of postsynaptic potentials are different among studies. Therefore, it is often difficult to compare the different results obtained by each study. In physiological calcium (i.e 1.3 mM), it appears that t-LTP and t-LTD requires a greater frequency of pairing (>5 Hz) or a greater number of postsynaptic APs (>3) even with a large number of repetitions (100 or 150; Inglebert et al., ). A better understanding of the rules of STDP induction in vitro under physiological conditions will allow a more robust application in vivo.
Implication for In vivo Exploration of STDP
In opposition to in vitro studies, and by definition, in vivo studies are inherently in a physiological calcium concentration. First demonstration of STDP in vivo was performed in the retinotectal pathway of Xenopus (Zhang et al., ). t-LTP and t-LTD were observed but were not robust and easily abolished by hyperpolarizations or spontaneous activities, a limitation recently highlighted by a biophysical model of STDP (Higgins et al., ). The use of a non-physiological concentration of calcium may lead to an underestimation of the time scales of memory maintenance as background activities is an important factor for limiting plasticity. Furthermore, most in vitro studies are performed in juvenile rodent while in vivo studies are performed in older animals. This may constitute an additional limitation to the transposition of the results observed in vitro. Several studies suggest that the capacity to induce t-LTD decreases with age (Banerjee et al., ; Verhoog et al., ) although a recent study has shown t-LTD at cortical layer V synapses in adult mice following pre-before-post protocol (Louth et al., ). Similarly, induction of t-LTD by a STDP protocol in the somato-sensory cortex of adult rats by pairing postsynaptic spikes and subthreshold whisker deflection is relatively frequent whereas induction of t-LTP in the same preparation is rare (Jacob et al., ). t-LTD disappeared rapidly after a few minutes (5–10 min) and t-LTP was sporadic following pre-before-post pairings (Jacob et al., ). As already suggested, STDP in older animals may require protocols that produce stronger depolarization (Meredith et al., ). In concordance with this idea, electrical stimulation of afferent input at high frequency paired with post-synaptic burst produced robust t-LTP in cat visual cortex (Frégnac et al., ). It is important to note that most of the results observed in vivo are obtained in the anesthetized animal. Although there are variations in extracellular calcium concentration of about 0.2 mM between awake and anesthetized animals (Ding et al., ), they are not sufficient to produce a major effect on the induction and maintenance of plasticity. An attractive explanation could be that in anesthetized animals, neuromodulation is largely depressed.
Importance of Neuromodulation
As demonstrated by Inglebert et al. fine tuning of pre- and postsynaptic activity can restore t-LTD and t-LTP in physiological extracellular calcium condition. But would it be possible to restore classic plasticity rules under regular patterns of activity? The key component could be neuromodulation. Interestingly, replay of activity from place-cells with overlapping firing field in hippocampal slices induced t-LTP only in the presence of Carbachol, a cholinergic agonist (Isaac et al., ). Many studies have now shown the effects of various neuromodulators on STDP. One of the most explored is dopamine (DA). It is involved in learning and reward processes (Schultz, ; Suri and Schultz, ). The activation of the D1 receptor (D1-R) has been shown to increase temporal window for t-LTP and to allow induction of t-LTP with fewer spike pairs at glutamatergic synapses of hippocampal neurons (Zhang et al., ). At CA3-CA1 synapses, D1-R activation switches t-LTD into t-LTP (Brzosko et al., ). In the prefrontal cortex, DA application allow t-LTP induction (He et al., ). The effects of the D1-R are widespread (Neve et al., ), but many of them could explain the reasons for promoting LTP. They could facilitate signal propagation by inhibiting A-type current (Hamilton et al., ; Edelmann and Lessmann, ; Yang and Dani, ) or simply increased intracellular calcium (Lezcano and Bergson, ). D2 receptors (D2-R) are also involved in t-LTP and t-LTD. In lateral amygdala, D2-R gates LTP induction by suppressing feedforward inhibition (Bissière et al., ). In some cases, a synergy is observed between the two receptors. In layer V of the prefrontal cortex, D1-R and D2-R co-activation enables the induction of t-LTP at extended timing interval (Xu and Yao, ). Noradrenaline (NA) is also involved in memory formation. Activation of β-adrenergic receptors (β-R) increases intracellular calcium (Seol et al., ) and facilitate bAP by inhibition of A-type current (Yuan et al., ) or SK channels (Faber et al., ). At CA3-CA1 synapses, β-R activation increases the temporal window induction for t-LTP (Lin et al., ). In layer II/III of visual cortex, co-activation of β-R and α-adrenergic receptor (α-R) are required for bidirectional STDP in fast-spiking and somatostatin interneurons. β-R activation promoted t-LTP whereas α-R activation induced t-LTD (Huang et al., , ). Neuromodulation could be seen as the necessary factor for the induction of t-LTP and t-LTD in physiological calcium without tuning pre- and postsynaptic activity.
Conclusion
Use of Physiological Calcium Levels for Studying Short-Term Synaptic Plasticity
The use of physiological external calcium concentration not only modulates the learning rules for long-term synaptic plasticity but it also enhances context-dependent synaptic plasticity. Analog-digital modulation of action potential-evoked synaptic transmission lies on modification of spike shape, by either broadening the axonal spike (Shu et al., ; Kole et al., ) or by modulating its amplitude (Rama et al., ; Zbili et al., ). Because transmitter release is almost maximal in high calcium, conditions that enhance release are somehow difficult to reach. Indeed, switching to physiological calcium concentration (i.e., 1.3 mM) was found to significantly enhance spike amplitude-dependent synaptic plasticity (Rama et al., ; Zbili et al., ).
Use of Physiological Calcium Levels for Studying Intrinsic Plasticity
Hebbian plasticity and Intrinsic plasticity are closely linked and are synergistically modified (Debanne et al., ). Generally, t-LTP is associated with an increase in excitability and t-LTD with a reduced excitability (Ganguly et al., ; Li et al., ). Interestingly, recordings using physiological calcium show a significant increase excitability of CA1 pyramidal neurons: lowered firing threshold, increased spontaneous firing and more depolarized resting membrane potential (Bjorefeldt et al., ). Dendritic integration or EPSP-Spike coupling is also modified with synaptic changes (Campanac and Debanne, ). Generally, LTP is accompanied by an increase in the probability of emitting an AP for the same synaptic input (EPSP-spike potentiation) whereas LTD is accompanied by a decrease in the probability of emitting an AP (EPSP-spike depression). This plasticity of the output, without modification of the input, result partially from postsynaptic changes in voltage dependent channels such as IH or IA (Daoudal and Debanne, ). EPSP-Spike coupling modification is also conditioned by changes in inhibitory synaptic transmission. Intriguingly, recording in physiological calcium in hippocampus have revealed that excitatory-inhibitory balance was disrupted and disynaptic inhibition was strongly decreased (Aivar et al., ).
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Author contributions
YI and DD wrote the article and YI built the figures. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was supported by Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-14-NEUC-0004 and ANR-14-CE13-003 to DD) and Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (FRM, FDT2017-0437059 to YI).
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. M. Russier for critically reading a preliminary version of the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AbrahamssonT.ChouC. Y. C.LiS. Y.MancinoA.CostaR. P.BrockJ. A.et al. (2017). Differential regulation of evoked and spontaneous release by presynaptic NMDA receptors. Neuron96, 839–855.e5. 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.09.030
2
AivarP.ValeroM.BellistriE.PridaL. M. D. L. (2014). Extracellular calcium controls the expression of two different forms of ripple-like hippocampal oscillations. J. Neurosci.34, 2989–3004. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2826-13.2014
3
Andrade-TalaveraY.Duque-FeriaP.PaulsenO.Rodríguez-MorenoA. (2016). Presynaptic spike timing-dependent long-term depression in the mouse hippocampus. Cereb. Cortex26, 3637–3654. 10.1093/cercor/bhw172
4
ArtolaA.BröcherS.SingerW. (1990). Different voltage-dependent thresholds for inducing long-term depression and long-term potentiation in slices of rat visual cortex. Nature347, 69–72. 10.1038/347069a0
5
BanerjeeA.MeredithR. M.Rodríguez-MorenoA.MierauS. B.AubersonY. P.PaulsenO. (2009). Double dissociation of spike timing-dependent potentiation and depression by subunit-preferring NMDA receptor antagonists in mouse barrel cortex. Cereb. Cortex19, 2959–2969. 10.1093/cercor/bhp067
6
BaranyiA.FehérO. (1981). Synaptic facilitation requires paired activation of convergent pathways in the neocortex. Nature290, 413–415. 10.1038/290413a0
7
BenderV. A. (2006). Two coincidence detectors for spike timing-dependent plasticity in somatosensory cortex. J. Neurosci.26, 4166–4177. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0176-06.2006
8
BiG.PooM. (1998). Synaptic modifications in cultured hippocampal neurons: dependence on spike timing, synaptic strength and postsynaptic cell type. J. Neurosci.18, 10464–10472. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-24-10464.1998
9
BissièreS.HumeauY.LüthiA. (2003). Dopamine gates LTP induction in lateral amygdala by suppressing feedforward inhibition. Nat. Neurosci.6, 587–592. 10.1038/nn1058
10
BjorefeldtA.IllesS.ZetterbergH.HanseE. (2018). Neuromodulation via the cerebrospinal fluid: insights from recent in vitro studies. Front. Neural Circuits12:5. 10.3389/fncir.2018.00005
11
BorstJ. G. G.SakmannB. (1996). Calcium influx and transmitter release in a fast CNS synapse. Nature383, 431–434. 10.1038/383431a0
12
BouvierG.LarsenR. S.Rodríguez-MorenoA.PaulsenO.SjöströmP. J. (2018). Towards resolving the presynaptic NMDA receptor debate. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.51, 1–7. 10.1016/j.conb.2017.12.020
13
BrandaliseF.CartaS.HelmchenF.LismanJ.GerberU. (2016). Dendritic NMDA spikes are necessary for timing-dependent associative LTP in CA3 pyramidal cells. Nat. Commun.7:13480. 10.1038/ncomms13480
14
BrzoskoZ.SchultzW.PaulsenO. (2015). Retroactive modulation of spike timing-dependent plasticity by dopamine. eLife4:e09685. 10.7554/eLife.09685
15
CampanacE.DebanneD. (2008). Spike timing-dependent plasticity: a learning rule for dendritic integration in rat CA1 pyramidal neurons. J. Physiol.586, 779–793. 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.147017
16
ChevaleyreV.TakahashiK. A.CastilloP. E. (2006). Endocannabinoid-mediated synaptic plasticity in the CNS. Annu. Rev. Neurosci.29, 37–76. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112834
17
DanY.PooM.-M. (2004). Spike timing-dependent plasticity of neural circuits. Neuron44, 23–30. 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.007
18
DaoudalG.DebanneD. (2003). Long-term plasticity of intrinsic excitability: learning rules and mechanisms. Learn. Mem.10, 456–465. 10.1101/lm.64103
19
DebanneD.GähwilerB. H.ThompsonS. M. (1994). Asynchronous pre-and postsynaptic activity induces associative long-term depression in area CA1 of the rat hippocampus in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A91, 1148–1152. 10.1073/pnas.91.3.1148
20
DebanneD.GähwilerB. H.ThompsonS. M. (1996a). Cooperative interactions in the induction of long-term potentiation and depression of synaptic excitation between hippocampal CA3-CA1 cell pairs in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A93, 11225–11230. 10.1073/pnas.93.20.11225
21
DebanneD.GuérineauN. C.GähwilerB. H.ThompsonS. M. (1996b). Paired-pulse facilitation and depression at unitary synapses in rat hippocampus: quantal fluctuation affects subsequent release. J. Physiol.491, 163–176. 10.1113/jphysiol.1996.sp021204
22
DebanneD.GähwilerB. H.ThompsonS. M. (1998). Long-term synaptic plasticity between pairs of individual CA3 pyramidal cells in rat hippocampal slice cultures. J. Physiol.507, 237–247. 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.237bu.x
23
DebanneD.InglebertY.RussierM. (2019). Plasticity of intrinsic neuronal excitability. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.54, 73–82. 10.1016/j.conb.2018.09.001
24
DingF.O’DonnellJ.XuQ.KangN.GoldmanN.NedergaardM. (2016). Changes in the composition of brain interstitial ions control the sleep-wake cycle. Science352, 550–555. 10.1126/science.aad4821
25
EdelmannE.LessmannV. (2011). Dopamine modulates spike timing-dependent plasticity and action potential properties in CA1 pyramidal neurons of acute rat hippocampal slices. Front. Synaptic Neurosci.3:6. 10.3389/fnsyn.2011.00006
26
FaberE. S. L.DelaneyA. J.PowerJ. M.SedlakP. L.CraneJ. W.SahP. (2008). Modulation of SK channel trafficking by beta adrenoceptors enhances excitatory synaptic transmission and plasticity in the amygdala. J. Neurosci.28, 10803–10813. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1796-08.2008
27
FeldmanD. E. (2000). Timing-based LTP and LTD at vertical inputs to layer II/III pyramidal cells in rat barrel cortex. Neuron27, 45–56. 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)00008-8
28
FeldmanD. E. (2012). The spike-timing dependence of plasticity. Neuron75, 556–571. 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.001
29
FinoE.VenanceL. (2010). Spike-timing dependent plasticity in the striatum. Front. Synaptic Neurosci.2:6. 10.3389/fnsyn.2010.00006
30
FrégnacY.PananceauM.RenéA.HuguetN.MarreO.LevyM.et al. (2010). A re-examination of hebbian-covariance rules and spike timing-dependent plasticity in cat visual cortex in vivo. Front. Synaptic Neurosci.2:147. 10.3389/fnsyn.2010.00147
31
FroemkeR. C.TsayI. A.RaadM.LongJ. D.DanY. (2006). Contribution of individual spikes in burst-induced long-term synaptic modification. J. Neurophysiol.95, 1620–1629. 10.1152/jn.00910.2005
32
FuenzalidaM.Fernández de SevillaD.CouveA.BuñoW. (2010). Role of AMPA and NMDA receptors and back-propagating action potentials in spike timing-dependent plasticity. J. Neurophysiol.103, 47–54. 10.1152/jn.00416.2009
33
GangulyK.KissL.PooM. (2000). Enhancement of presynaptic neuronal excitability by correlated presynaptic and postsynaptic spiking. Nat. Neurosci.3, 1018–1026. 10.1038/79838
34
GraupnerM.BrunelN. (2010). Mechanisms of induction and maintenance of spike-timing dependent plasticity in biophysical synapse models. Front. Comput. Neurosci.4:136. 10.3389/fncom.2010.00136
35
GraupnerM.BrunelN. (2012). Calcium-based plasticity model explains sensitivity of synaptic changes to spike pattern, rate and dendritic location. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A109, 3991–3996. 10.1073/pnas.1109359109
36
GustafssonB.WigströmH. (1986). Hippocampal long-lasting potentiation produced by pairing single volleys and brief conditioning tetani evoked in separate afferents. J. Neurosci.6, 1575–1582. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.06-06-01575.1986
37
HamiltonT. J.WheatleyB. M.SinclairD. B.BachmannM.LarkumM. E.ColmersW. F. (2010). Dopamine modulates synaptic plasticity in dendrites of rat and human dentate granule cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A107, 18185–18190. 10.1073/pnas.1011558107
38
HardinghamN. R.BannisterN. J.ReadJ. C. A.FoxK. D.HardinghamG. E.JackJ. J. B. (2006). Extracellular calcium regulates postsynaptic efficacy through group 1 metabotropic glutamate receptors. J. Neurosci.26, 6337–6345. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5128-05.2006
39
HeK.HuertasM.HongS. Z.TieX.HellJ. W.ShouvalH.et al. (2015). Distinct eligibility traces for LTP and LTD in cortical synapses. Neuron88, 528–538. 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.037
40
HebbD. O. (1949). The Organization of Behavior; A Neuropsychological Theory. Oxford, England: Wiley.
41
HigginsD.GraupnerM.BrunelN. (2014). Memory maintenance in synapses with calcium-based plasticity in the presence of background activity. PLoS Comput. Biol.10:e1003834. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003834
42
HoffmanD. A.MageeJ. C.ColbertC. M.JohnstonD. (1997). K+ channel regulation of signal propagation in dendrites of hippocampal pyramidal neurons. Nature387, 869–875. 10.1038/43119
43
HolbroN.GrunditzA.WiegertJ. S.OertnerT. G. (2010). AMPA receptors gate spine Ca(2+) transients and spike-timing-dependent potentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A107, 15975–15980. 10.1073/pnas.1004562107
44
HuangS.HuganirR. L.KirkwoodA. (2013). Adrenergic gating of Hebbian spike-timing-dependent plasticity in cortical interneurons. J. Neurosci.33, 13171–13178. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5741-12.2013
45
HuangS.RozasC.TreviñoM.ContrerasJ.YangS.SongL.et al. (2014). Associative hebbian synaptic plasticity in primate visual cortex. J. Neurosci.34, 7575–7579. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0983-14.2014
46
InglebertY.AljadeffJ.BrunelN.DebanneD. (2020). Synaptic plasticity rules with physiological calcium levels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A117, 33639–33648. 10.1073/pnas.2013663117
47
IsaacJ. T. R.BuchananK. A.MullerR. U.MellorJ. R. (2009). Hippocampal place cell firing patterns can induce long-term synaptic plasticity in vitro. J. Neurosci.29, 6840–6850. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0731-09.2009
48
JacobV.BrasierD. J.ErchovaI.FeldmanD.ShulzD. E. (2007). Spike timing-dependent synaptic depression in the in vivo barrel cortex of the rat. J. Neurosci.27, 1271–1284. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4264-06.2007
49
JonesH. C.KeepR. F. (1988). Brain fluid calcium concentration and response to acute hypercalcaemia during development in the rat. J. Physiol.402, 579–593. 10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017223
50
KampaB. M.ClementsJ.JonasP.StuartG. J. (2004). Kinetics of Mg2+ unblock of NMDA receptors: implications for spike-timing dependent synaptic plasticity. J. Physiol.556, 337–345. 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.058842
51
KampaB. M.LetzkusJ. J.StuartG. J. (2006). Requirement of dendritic calcium spikes for induction of spike-timing-dependent synaptic plasticity. J. Physiol.574, 283–290. 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.111062
52
KarmarkarU. R.BuonomanoD. V. (2002). Model of spike-timing dependent plasticity: one or two coincidence detectors. J. Neurophysiol.88, 507–513. 10.1152/jn.2002.88.1.507
53
KavalaliE. T. (2015). The mechanisms and functions of spontaneous neurotransmitter release. Nat. Rev. Neurosci.16, 5–16. 10.1038/nrn3875
54
KoesterH. J.SakmannB. (1998). Calcium dynamics in single spines during coincident pre- and postsynaptic activity depend on relative timing of back-propagating action potentials and subthreshold excitatory postsynaptic potentials. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A95, 9596–9601. 10.1073/pnas.95.16.9596
55
KoleM. H. P.LetzkusJ. J.StuartG. J. (2007). Axon initial segment Kv1 channels control axonal action potential waveform and synaptic efficacy. Neuron55, 633–647. 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.07.031
56
KonorskiJ. (1948). Conditioned Reflexes and Neuron Organization. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
57
LevyW. B.StewardO. (1983). Temporal contiguity requirements for long-term associative potentiation/depression in the hippocampus. Neuroscience8, 791–797. 10.1016/0306-4522(83)90010-6
58
LezcanoN.BergsonC. (2002). D1/D5 dopamine receptors stimulate intracellular calcium release in primary cultures of neocortical and hippocampal neurons. J. Neurophysiol.87, 2167–2175. 10.1152/jn.00541.2001
59
LiC.LuJ.WuC.DuanS.PooM. (2004). Bidirectional modification of presynaptic neuronal excitability accompanying spike timing-dependent synaptic plasticity. Neuron41, 257–268. 10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00847-x
60
LinY.-W.MinM.-Y.ChiuT.-H.YangH.-W. (2003). Enhancement of associative long-term potentiation by activation of β-adrenergic receptors at CA1 synapses in rat hippocampal slices. J. Neurosci.23, 4173–4181. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-10-04173.2003
61
LismanJ.YasudaR.RaghavachariS. (2012). Mechanisms of CaMKII action in long-term potentiation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci.13, 169–182. 10.1038/nrn3192
62
LouthE. L.JørgensenR. L.KorshoejA. R.SørensenJ. C. H.CapognaM. (2021). Dopaminergic neuromodulation of spike timing dependent plasticity in mature adult rodent and human cortical neurons. Front. Cell. Neurosci.15:135. 10.3389/fncel.2021.668980
63
MalinowR.MalenkaR. C. (2002). AMPA receptor trafficking and synaptic plasticity. Annu. Rev. Neurosci.25, 103–126. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.112701.142758
64
MarkramH.LübkeJ.FrotscherM.SakmannB. (1997). Regulation of synaptic efficacy by coincidence of postsynaptic APs and EPSPs. Science275, 213–215. 10.1126/science.275.5297.213
65
MeredithR. M.Floyer-LeaA. M.PaulsenO. (2003). Maturation of long-term potentiation induction rules in rodent hippocampus: role of GABAergic inhibition. J. Neurosci.23, 11142–11146. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-35-11142.2003
66
MihalasS. (2011). Calcium messenger heterogeneity: a possible signal for spike timing-dependent plasticity. Front. Comput. Neurosci.4:158. 10.3389/fncom.2010.00158
67
MishraR. K.KimS.GuzmanS. J.JonasP. (2016). Symmetric spike timing-dependent plasticity at CA3-CA3 synapses optimizes storage and recall in autoassociative networks. Nat. Commun.7:11552. 10.1038/ncomms11552
68
NeveK. A.SeamansJ. K.Trantham-DavidsonH. (2004). Dopamine receptor signaling. J. Recept. Signal Transduct. Res.24, 165–205. 10.1081/rrs-200029981
69
NevianT.SakmannB. (2006). Spine Ca2+ signaling in spike-timing-dependent plasticity. J. Neurosci.26, 11001–11013. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1749-06.2006
70
NishiyamaM.HongK.MikoshibaK.PooM. M.KatoK. (2000). Calcium stores regulate the polarity and input specificity of synaptic modification. Nature408, 584–588. 10.1038/35046067
71
NormannC.PeckysD.SchulzeC. H.WaldenJ.JonasP.BischofbergerJ. (2000). Associative long-term depression in the hippocampus is dependent on postsynaptic N-type Ca2+ Channels. J. Neurosci.20, 8290–8297. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-22-08290.2000
72
OtmakhovaN. A.OtmakhovN.LismanJ. E. (2002). Pathway-specific properties of AMPA and NMDA-mediated transmission in CA1 hippocampal pyramidal cells. J. Neurosci.22, 1199–1207. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-04-01199.2002
73
PawlakV.KerrJ. N. D. (2008). Dopamine receptor activation is required for corticostriatal spike-timing-dependent plasticity. J. Neurosci.28, 2435–2446. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4402-07.2008
74
RamaS.ZbiliM.BialowasA.Fronzaroli-MolinieresL.AnkriN.CarlierE.et al. (2015). Presynaptic hyperpolarization induces a fast analogue modulation of spike-evoked transmission mediated by axonal sodium channels. Nat. Commun.6:10163. 10.1038/ncomms10163
75
Rodríguez-MorenoA.PaulsenO. (2008). Spike timing-dependent long-term depression requires presynaptic NMDA receptors. Nat. Neurosci.11, 744–745. 10.1038/nn.2125
76
RosenmundC.FeltzA.WestbrookG. L. (1995). Calcium-dependent inactivation of synaptic NMDA receptors in hippocampal neurons. J. Neurophysiol.73, 427–430. 10.1152/jn.1995.73.1.427
77
ScanzianiM.CapognaM.GähwilerB. H.ThompsonS. M. (1992). Presynaptic inhibition of miniature excitatory synaptic currents by baclofen and adenosine in the hippocampus. Neuron9, 919–927. 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90244-8
78
SchillerJ.SchillerY. (2001). NMDA receptor-mediated dendritic spikes and coincident signal amplification. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.11, 343–348. 10.1016/s0959-4388(00)00217-8
79
SchultzW. (1997). Dopamine neurons and their role in reward mechanisms. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.7, 191–197. 10.1016/s0959-4388(97)80007-4
80
SeolG. H.ZiburkusJ.HuangS.SongL.KimI. T.TakamiyaK.et al. (2007). Neuromodulators control the polarity of spike-timing-dependent synaptic plasticity. Neuron55, 919–929. 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.08.013
81
ShouvalH. Z.BearM. F.CooperL. N. (2002). A unified model of NMDA receptor-dependent bidirectional synaptic plasticity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A99, 10831–10836. 10.1073/pnas.152343099
82
ShuY.HasenstaubA.DuqueA.YuY.McCormickD. A. (2006). Modulation of intracortical synaptic potentials by presynaptic somatic membrane potential. Nature441, 761–765. 10.1038/nature04720
83
SilverI. A.ErecińskaM. (1990). Intracellular and extracellular changes of [Ca2+] in hypoxia and ischemia in rat brain in vivo. J. Gen. Physiol.95, 837–866. 10.1085/jgp.95.5.837
84
SjöströmP. J.HäusserM. (2006). A cooperative switch determines the sign of synaptic plasticity in distal dendrites of neocortical pyramidal neurons. Neuron51, 227–238. 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.06.017
85
SjöströmP. J.TurrigianoG. G.NelsonS. B. (2001). Rate, timing and cooperativity jointly determine cortical synaptic plasticity. Neuron32, 1149–1164. 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00542-6
86
SjöströmP. J.TurrigianoG. G.NelsonS. B. (2003). Neocortical LTD via coincident activation of presynaptic NMDA and cannabinoid receptors. Neuron39, 641–654. 10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00476-8
87
SprustonN. (2008). Pyramidal neurons: dendritic structure and synaptic integration. Nat. Rev. Neurosci.9, 206–221. 10.1038/nrn2286
88
StantonP. K.SejnowskiT. J. (1989). Associative long-term depression in the hippocampus induced by hebbian covariance. Nature339, 215–218. 10.1038/339215a0
89
StentG. S. (1973). A physiological mechanism for hebb’s postulate of learning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A70, 997–1001. 10.1073/pnas.70.4.997
90
StuartG. J.HäusserM. (2001). Dendritic coincidence detection of EPSPs and action potentials. Nat. Neurosci.4, 63–71. 10.1038/82910
91
SüdhofT. C. (2012). The presynaptic active zone. Neuron75, 11–25. 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.06.012
92
SuriR. E.SchultzW. (1999). A neural network model with dopamine-like reinforcement signal that learns a spatial delayed response task. Neuroscience91, 871–890. 10.1016/s0306-4522(98)00697-6
93
TazerartS.MitchellD. E.Miranda-RottmannS.ArayaR. (2020). A spike-timing-dependent plasticity rule for dendritic spines. Nat. Commun.11:4276. 10.1038/s41467-020-17861-7
94
TzounopoulosT.KimY.OertelD.TrussellL. O. (2004). Cell-specific, spike timing-dependent plasticities in the dorsal cochlear nucleus. Nat. Neurosci.7, 719–725. 10.1038/nn1272
95
VerhoogM. B.GoriounovaN. A.ObermayerJ.StroederJ.HjorthJ. J. J.Testa-SilvaG.et al. (2013). Mechanisms underlying the rules for associative plasticity at adult human neocortical synapses. J. Neurosci.33, 17197–17208. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3158-13.2013
96
VyletaN. P.SmithS. M. (2011). Spontaneous glutamate release is independent of calcium influx and tonically activated by the calcium-sensing receptor. J. Neurosci.31, 4593–4606. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6398-10.2011
97
WeberJ. P.AndrásfalvyB. K.PolitoM.MagóÁ.UjfalussyB. B.MakaraJ. K. (2016). Location-dependent synaptic plasticity rules by dendritic spine cooperativity. Nat. Commun.7:11380. 10.1038/ncomms11380
98
WittenbergG. M.WangS. S.-H. (2006). Malleability of spike-timing-dependent plasticity at the CA3-CA1 synapse. J. Neurosci.26, 6610–6617. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5388-05.2006
99
XuT.-X.YaoW.-D. (2010). D1 and D2 dopamine receptors in separate circuits cooperate to drive associative long-term potentiation in the prefrontal cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A107, 16366–16371. 10.1073/pnas.1004108107
100
YangK.DaniJ. A. (2014). Dopamine D1 and D5 receptors modulate spike timing-dependent plasticity at medial perforant path to dentate granule cell synapses. J. Neurosci.34, 15888–15897. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2400-14.2014
101
YangS.-N.TangY.-G.ZuckerR. S. (1999). Selective induction of LTP and LTD by postsynaptic [Ca2+]i elevation. J. Neurophysiol.81, 781–787. 10.1152/jn.1999.81.2.781
102
YuanL.-L.AdamsJ. P.SwankM.SweattJ. D.JohnstonD. (2002). Protein kinase modulation of dendritic K+ channels in hippocampus involves a mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. J. Neurosci.22, 4860–4868. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-12-04860.2002
103
ZbiliM.RamaS.YgerP.InglebertY.Boumedine-GuignonN.Fronzaroli-MoliniereL.et al. (2020). Axonal Na+ channels detect and transmit levels of input synchrony in local brain circuits. Sci. Adv.6:eaay4313. 10.1126/sciadv.aay4313
104
ZhangJ.-C.LauP.-M.BiG.-Q. (2009). Gain in sensitivity and loss in temporal contrast of STDP by dopaminergic modulation at hippocampal synapses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A106, 13028–13033. 10.1073/pnas.0900546106
105
ZhangL. I.TaoH. W.HoltC. E.HarrisW. A.PooM. (1998). A critical window for cooperation and competition among developing retinotectal synapses. Nature395, 37–44. 10.1038/25665
106
ZhouQ.TaoH. W.PooM. (2003). Reversal and stabilization of synaptic modifications in a developing visual system. Science300, 1953–1957. 10.1126/science.1082212
107
ZhouY.-D.AckerC. D.NetoffT. I.SenK.WhiteJ. A. (2005). Increasing Ca2+ transients by broadening postsynaptic action potentials enhances timing-dependent synaptic depression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A102, 19121–19125. 10.1073/pnas.0509856103
Summary
Keywords
synaptic plasticity, synapse, STDP, hippocampus, learning, memory, calcium
Citation
Inglebert Y and Debanne D (2021) Calcium and Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 15:727336. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2021.727336
Received
18 June 2021
Accepted
26 August 2021
Published
20 September 2021
Volume
15 - 2021
Edited by
Francesco Mattia Rossi, Universidad de la República, Uruguay
Reviewed by
Marco Capogna, Aarhus University, Denmark; Michael Graupner, New York University, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Inglebert and Debanne.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Dominique Debanne dominique.debanne@inserm.fr Yanis Inglebert yanis.inglebert@mail.mcgill.ca
Specialty section: This article was submitted to Cellular Neurophysiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.