Abstract
Neurons respond to changes in the levels of activity they experience in a variety of ways, including structural changes at pre- and postsynaptic terminals. An essential plasticity signal required for such activity-regulated structural adjustments are reactive oxygen species (ROS). To identify sources of activity-regulated ROS required for structural plasticity in vivo we used the Drosophila larval neuromuscular junction as a highly tractable experimental model system. For adjustments of presynaptic motor terminals, we found a requirement for both NADPH oxidases, Nox and dual oxidase (Duox), that are encoded in the Drosophila genome. This contrasts with the postsynaptic dendrites from which Nox is excluded. NADPH oxidases generate ROS to the extracellular space. Here, we show that two aquaporins, Bib and Drip, are necessary ROS conduits in the presynaptic motoneuron for activity regulated, NADPH oxidase dependent changes in presynaptic motoneuron terminal growth. Our data further suggest that different aspects of neuronal activity-regulated structural changes might be regulated by different ROS sources: changes in bouton number require both NADPH oxidases, while activity-regulated changes in the number of active zones might be modulated by other sources of ROS. Overall, our results show NADPH oxidases as important enzymes for mediating activity-regulated plasticity adjustments in neurons.
1. Introduction
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) have commonly been associated with detrimental processes such as oxidative stress, toxicity, aging, neurodegeneration, and cell death because increases in ROS levels seen with aging and neurodegenerative disorders, including Parkinson's (Spina and Cohen, ) and Alzheimer's disease (Martins et al., ). However, it is appreciated that ROS are not simply cytotoxic agents, but more generally function as signaling molecules in a multitude of processes, (Rhee, ; Sauer et al., ) including growth factor signaling (Suzukawa et al., ; Goldsmit et al., ; Kamata et al., ; Nitti et al., ), wound healing (Razzell et al., ), and in development (Milton et al., ; Oswald M. C. et al., ; Oswald M. et al., ; Dhawan et al., for a reviews see Owusu-Ansah and Banerjee, ; Massaad and Klann, ; Wilson and González-Billault, ; Terzi and Suter, ).
During nervous system development, ROS signaling is involved at all stages, from neurogenesis to pathfinding to synaptic transmission (Knapp and Klann, ; Kishida and Klann, ; Massaad and Klann, ; Wilson and González-Billault, ; Wilson et al., ; Terzi and Suter, ). When studying ROS signaling in vivo, challenges include the ability to disentangle cell autonomous from indirect or systemic effects; or to determine sources and types of ROS. Using the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, as a highly tractable experimental model system, genetic manipulations targeted to single motoneurons were able to identify hydrogen peroxide as a synaptic plasticity signal, generated as a consequence of neuronal overactivation and both necessary and sufficient for activity-regulated adaptive changes of synaptic terminal structure and transmission (Oswald M. C. et al., ; Dhawan et al., ). We found mitochondria to be a major source of activity-regulated hydrogen peroxide with opposing effects on the growth of pre- vs. postsynaptic terminals: at the presynaptic terminal of the neuromuscular junction (NMJ) overactivation and hydrogen peroxide cause increases in terminals (Milton et al., ; Oswald M. C. et al., ). This change in presynaptic terminal growth is mediated by activation of the JNK signaling pathway (Milton et al., ), and it utilizes the conserved Parkinson's disease-linked protein, DJ-1β, as a redox sensor, which regulates the PTEN-PI3 Kinase growth pathway (Oswald M. C. et al., ). In contrast, the size of postsynaptic dendritic arbors is negatively regulated by over-activation and activity-regulated hydrogen peroxide (Tripodi et al., ; Oswald M. C. et al., ; Dhawan et al., ). These studies using the Drosophila larval neuromuscular model system contrast with findings from cultured hippocampal neurons, which posit mitochondrially generated superoxide as the principal ROS signal downstream of over-activation (Hongpaisan et al., , ). The extent to which both types of ROS operate as neuronal plasticity signals downstream of over-activation remains to be resolved, though it is possible that apparent discrepancies might be due to the use of different cellular models and/or a reflection of the degree of overactivation.
Another principal source of ROS are NADPH oxidases, whose location in the plasma membrane could facilitate sub-cellular signaling discrete from mitochondrial ROS production. NADPH oxidases are integral membrane proteins that mediate a single electron transfer from NADPH to oxygen, thereby converting it to superoxide (Lambeth, ). These enzymes are prevalent throughout the evolutionary ladder from Amoebozoa and fungi to higher plants and mammals. NADPH oxidases are involved in growth and plasticity during nervous system development (Serrano et al., ; Tejada-Simon et al., ; Kishida et al., ; Munnamalai and Suter, ; Munnamalai et al., ; Olguín-Albuerne and Morán, ; Wilson et al., , ; Terzi and Suter, ). In contrast to mammalian genomes, which encode seven Nox isoforms (Nox 1–5 and Duox 1 and 2; Lambeth, ; Kawahara et al., ), Drosophila melanogaster encodes just two NADPH oxidases: dual oxidase (Duox) and a Nox-5 homolog (Nox). Enzymatic activity of both is calcium-regulated, via their N-terminal calcium binding EF-hands (Ha et al., ,, ; Moreira et al., ; Razzell et al., ). Curiously, the mouse genome does not encode a calcium-regulated Nox-5 homolog, which has therefore not been studied extensively in vivo (Kawahara et al., ). Recently, we identified the NADPH oxidase Duox as necessary in motoneurons to reduce their dendritic arbors in response to neuronal over-activation, an adaptive response to reduce the numbers of presynaptic inputs and thus synaptic drive (Zwart et al., ; Dhawan et al., ). We further found that these activity-regulated ROS, generated by Duox at the extracellular face of the plasma membrane, required the aquaporins, Bib and Drip; presumably for efficient entry into the cytoplasm to regulate dendritic growth and/or stability (Dhawan et al., ).
Here, we investigated the role of NADPH oxidases at the presynaptic terminal of the NMJ, whose growth response to neuronal over-activation is distinct to that of the dendritic compartment of the motoneuron. We show that the NADPH oxidases Duox and Nox are sources of activity-regulated ROS that mediate activity-regulated growth of NMJ terminals. In contrast to motoneuron dendrites, both NADPH oxidases function at the presynaptic NMJ, necessary and sufficient to elicit changes in growth. At the NMJ too, we find the aquaporins, Bib and Drip, are necessary for ROS signaling at the NMJ. This arrangement at the presynaptic NMJ terminal contrasts with their dendritic function within these motoneurons, where only Duox, but not Nox, is required. This differential requirement of Nox mirrors its sub-cellular localization, with Nox largely excluded from dendrites. Furthermore, at the postsynaptic compartment extracellular ROS, including from other neurons in the vicinity, act as local plasticity signals that cause reductions in dendritic arbor size (Dhawan et al., ).
2. Results
2.1. NADPH oxidases, Duox and Nox, are both required for activity-regulated growth at the neuromuscular junction
Mitochondria are a major source of activity-generated ROS, notably within the cytoplasm. Here, we sought to investigate the role of membrane localized ROS generators, the NADPH oxidases Nox and Duox, during activity-regulated adjustment of presynaptic terminals. As a highly tractable experimental model we used the well-characterized neuromuscular junction (NMJ) of the Drosophila larva (Frank et al., ). Specifically, we focused on the NMJ of the so called “anterior Corner Cell” (aCC), which innervates the most dorsal body wall muscle, known as muscle 1 (Crossley, ) or dorsal acute muscle 1 (DA1; Sink and Whitington, ; Bate, ; Landgraf et al., ; Baines et al., , ; Hoang and Chiba, ; Choi et al., ). For cell-specific over-activation of aCC motoneurons, we used the established paradigm of targeted mis-expression of the warmth-gated cation channel, dTRPA1 Gain-of-Function (GoF; Hamada et al., ; Oswald M. C. et al., ; Dhawan et al., ). This allows aCC motoneurons to be selectively overactivated simply by placing larvae at >24°C, the temperature threshold for dTRPA1 ion channel opening (Pulver et al., ).
First, we re-confirmed that at 25°C dTrpA1[GoF] in aCC motoneurons leads to significant increases in bouton number at the aCC-DA1 NMJ relative to non-manipulated controls, as previously shown (Oswald M. C. et al., ; Figure 1). An advantage of using cell-specific dTRPA1-mediated activity manipulations in this system is that these can be carried out at 25°C, a temperature considered optimal for Drosophila melanogaster development (Lachaise et al., ; Pool et al., ) and therefore generally considered neutral, while sufficient to mildly activate neurons that mis-express dTRPA1 (Pulver et al., ; Tsai et al., ).
Figure 1
Next, we tested the requirement for the two NADPH oxidases encoded in the Drosophila genome, Duox and Nox, in mediating these activity-regulated structural changes at the NMJ. To this end, we expressed RNAi transgenes for knocking down endogenous Duox or Nox in aCC motoneurons. By themselves, expression of Duox[RNAi] or Nox[RNAi] transgenes in aCC motoneurons have no measurable effect on NMJ morphology. However, in motoneurons that have been overactivated by dTrpA1[GoF], the characteristic activity-induced bouton overgrowth phenotype is suppressed by co-expression of Duox[RNAi] or Nox[RNAi] transgenes, individually or combined (Figures 1A, B). Neuronal overactivation by dTrpA1[GoF] also causes a reduction in active zone numbers (Oswald M. C. et al., ). We find that simultaneous knockdown of NADPH oxidases seems to ameliorate active zone reductions, though differences were subtle and not statistically significant (Figure 1C). These results show that the membrane localized ROS generators, Nox and Duox, are required primarily for activity-regulated changes in presynaptic terminal growth, while the impact on presynaptic release sites was less clear.
2.2. Duox and Nox activity is sufficient for mediating structural changes at the NMJ
We next asked if the activity of these NADPH oxidases might also be sufficient for regulating presynaptic terminal growth. To test this, we induced a NADPH oxidase gain-of-function by overexpression of Duox[GoF] or Nox[GoF] transgenes in aCC motoneurons. Quantification showed comparable increases in bouton number at the NMJ as a consequence of overexpression of either Duox[GoF] or Nox[GoF]. No enhancement of this phenotype occurs when both are co-expressed (Figure 2). In contrast, active zone numbers are not significantly impacted by overexpression of either NADPH oxidase (Figure 1).
Figure 2
For the postsynaptic compartment, namely the dendritic arbor of motoneurons, we had previously shown that only Duox, but not Nox, has a role in activity-regulated plasticity (Dhawan et al., ). To further explore this difference in NADPH oxidase requirement between pre- vs. postsynaptic compartments, we generated tagged transgenes of both NADPH oxidases, UAS-Duox::mRuby2::HA and UAS-Nox::YPet. When expressed in aCC motoneurons to reveal subcellular localization, we see exclusion of Nox::YPet from the postsynaptic dendrites, while Duox::mRuby2::HA is fairly homogeneously distributed within the plasma membrane (Figure 2C). These patterns of distinct subcellular distributions, notably exclusion of Nox::YPet from dendrites, are compatible with the genetic manipulations phenotypes. They point to selective sorting of Nox to soma and presynaptic compartments, based on the fluorescently tagged transgene.
2.3. Aquaporin channel proteins Bib and Drip are necessary for NADPH oxidase-regulated structural changes at the NMJ
The NADPH oxidases Duox and Nox are transmembrane proteins that generate ROS at the extracellular face of the plasma membrane (Lambeth, ; Panday et al., ). We reasoned that if NADPH oxidase-generated ROS are indeed instrumental in activity-regulated adjustment of synaptic terminals, then neutralization of extracellular ROS should rescue NMJ phenotypes associated with NADPH oxidase overexpression. To test this, we mis-expressed in aCC motoneurons two different forms of catalases that are secreted to the extracellular space; a human version and the Drosophila immune-regulated catalase (IRC; Ha et al., ,; Fogarty et al., ). These catalases neutralize extracellular hydrogen peroxide by conversion to water. On their own, their mis-expression in aCC motoneurons has no significant impact on NMJ structure or size. To test the model of neuronal activity leading to NADPH oxidase activation, leading to extracellular ROS production, we co-expressed secreted catalase in aCC motoneurons while over-activating these with dTrpA1[GoF]. The presence of a secreted catalase suppresses the NMJ growth that would otherwise ensue with neuronal overactivation (Figure 3A). Similarly, NMJ over-growth stimulated by over-expression of Duox (Duox[GoF]) is also neutralized by co-expression of secreted catalase in the same neuron (Figure 3B). These experiments demonstrate that it is the presence of extracellular ROS, notably hydrogen peroxide generated by NADPH oxidases, which leads to activity-induced changes in NMJ growth.
Figure 3
Because NAPDH oxidases generate ROS extracellularly, we wanted to explore how extracellular ROS might enter the cell so as to act on intracellular signaling pathways that would regulate NMJ growth. Several studies, including one from this lab, have postulated a role for aquaporin channels, specifically those encoded by the genes Bib and Drip (Albertini and Bianchi, ; Dhawan et al., ; Dutta and Das, ). Indeed, for the presynaptic NMJ, we found that co-expression of UAS-RNAi constructs designed to knock down Bib or Drip, but not those for Prip, rescue NMJ growth phenotypes caused by dTRPA1-mediated overactivation. Expression of the UAS-RNAi constructs alone had no significant effect (Figure 3A). To further test the model that extracellular ROS generated by NADPH oxidases cause structural change at the NMJ, we overexpressed Duox[GoF] in aCC motoneurons and at the same time co-expressed UAS-RNAi constructs designed to knock down the aquaporin channel proteins Bib[RNAi] or Drip[RNAi]. In those neurons the Duox[GoF] NMJ growth phenotype is fully rescued (Figure 3B).
In summary, our observations suggest that at the presynaptic NMJ, neuronal overactivation leads to activation of both NADPH oxidases, Duox and Nox, at the plasma membrane. These enzymes generate ROS at the extracellular face, which are then brought into the cytoplasm by aquaporin channels comprising Bib and Drip. Inside the cell, the ROS act on intracellular membrane-localized signaling pathways that regulate synaptic terminal structure and size, including the phosphatase PTEN and DJ-1ß, as previously shown (Oswald M. C. et al., ; Figure 4).
Figure 4
3. Discussion
ROS have increasingly been recognized as signaling molecules required for nervous system development and function, from regulating the dynamics of the growth cone cytoskeleton to synaptic transmission and learning (see Terzi and Suter, ). At the Drosophila NMJ, ROS have been shown necessary for activity-induced synaptic terminal growth (Oswald M. C. et al., ). ROS have also been shown causative and sufficient to induce changes at synaptic terminals; when accumulating as a result of physiological dysfunction, leading to oxidative stress (Milton et al., ), or following manipulations that increase ROS levels (Milton et al., ; Hussain et al., ; Peng et al., ). While mitochondria are a major source of cellular ROS (Murphy, ; Zorov et al., ; Sanz, ), it has remained unclear to what extent mitochondrial or indeed other sources of ROS, as explored in this study, directly impact effectors that regulate synaptic terminal growth. At the larval NMJ, different signaling pathways feed into growth regulation, notably Wnt (Budnik and Salinas, ; Koles and Budnik, ), BMP (Bayat et al., ; Berke et al., ; Sulkowski et al., ; Osses and Henríquez, ), PKA, CREB, and the transcription factor AP-1 (Davis et al., , ; Sanyal et al., , ; Davis, ; Walker et al., ; Cho et al., ; Davis and Müller, ). ROS might serve a general role in amplifying signaling pathway activity by disinhibition of pathway-associated protein kinases. For example, at the Drosophila NMJ, we previously showed that activity-regulated ROS inhibit the phosphatase PTEN, and thus disinhibit PI3Kinase, whose activity promotes synaptic terminal growth (Martín-Peña et al., ; Acebes and Morales, ; Jordán-Álvarez et al., ; Oswald M. C. et al., ). ROS have further been shown to modulate BMP signaling in sympathetic neurons (Chandrasekaran et al., ; Sánchez-de-Diego et al., ) and Wnt pathways in non-neuronal cells (Funato et al., ; Love et al., ; Rharass et al., ). The link between PKA and ROS is not well-understood though ROS can activate PKA in Amygdala neurons, increasing their excitability (Li et al., ). Changes in neuronal excitability can also be directly modulated by oxidation of any number of ion channels, for example of the K-channel auxiliary subunit, Hyperkinetic (Fogle et al., ; Kempf et al., ). We therefore hypothesize that ROS may provide neuronal activity-regulated modulation of multiple canonical synaptic plasticity pathways. In such a scenario, one might expect that the necessary spatial precision is achieved through distinct sources of ROS generation.
3.1. Differential requirements for NADPH oxidases in pre- vs. postsynaptic compartments
In this study, we focused on NADPH oxidases as generators of ROS that are ideally positioned to influence signaling at the plasma membrane. Working with the NMJ in the Drosophila larva as an experimental in vivo model system, we demonstrated that both NADPH oxidases, Nox and Duox, are required for activity-induced growth (Figure 1). Both enzymes are endowed with N-terminal calcium binding EF-hand motifs, linking their activity to intracellular calcium levels, as shown for Drosophila Duox (Ha et al., ; Rigutto et al., ; Razzell et al., ) and the vertebrate homolog, Nox5 (Bánfi et al., ; Millana Fañanás et al., ). Conversely, overexpression of either enzyme is sufficient to phenocopy such presynaptic terminal growth (Figure 2). Curiously, the requirement for NADPH oxidases in regulating dendritic growth is different, with only Duox, but not Nox, mediating activity-induced reduction of dendritic arbor size (Dhawan et al., ). This difference in pre- vs. postsynaptic compartment regulation is mirrored by their differential sub-cellular localization, with tagged Nox protein being effectively excluded from the postsynaptic dendritic arbors, unlike Duox (Figure 2C). Apart from this differential pre- vs. postsynaptic requirement, it is unclear to what extent Nox and Duox might perform different functions during activity-regulated growth. At the NMJ, where both are present and required, we found no difference in phenotypes following RNAi knockdown or mis-expression. Curiously, phenotypes were also comparable regardless of whether the expression of both enzymes was manipulated simultaneously or individually, suggesting either a saturation of phenotype or, speculatively, that Nox and Duox might operate in the same signaling pathway with their activation contingent on one another.
3.2. NADPH oxidases generate extracellular ROS and can mediate autocrine signaling
Because Nox and Duox generate ROS at the extracellular face they have the potential for inter-cellular signaling, as during wound healing (Niethammer et al., ; Razzell et al., ; Niethammer, ). Indeed, within the dense meshwork of neuronal processes and synapses of the CNS, we recently found that reduction of extracellular hydrogen peroxide in the vicinity of dendritic processes (by mis-expression of a secreted catalase) or attenuation of ROS entry into those dendrites (by knock-down of aquaporins), both cause significant dendritic over-growth (Dhawan et al., ). This suggests that within the densely innervated central neuropile, extracellular ROS generated, including by activity-regulated NADPH oxidases, might function as local signals to which neurons respond with adjustments of their synaptic terminals. This contrasts with the peripheral Drosophila larval NMJ, where we did not see any significant changes in synaptic terminal morphology following manipulations that would either reduce entry of ROS into the presynaptic terminal or reductions of extracellular ROS (Figure 3). These observations suggest that at the presynaptic NMJ, NADPH oxidases might be required primarily under conditions of elevated neuronal activity. While this suggests that at the presynaptic NMJ, NADPH oxidase-generated ROS might be engaged in autocrine signaling, there is potential for inter-cellular signaling with adjacent muscles and glia.
Extracellular ROS signaling at both pre- and postsynaptic compartments is underlined by the requirement for the aquaporin channel proteins, Bib and Drip (Figure 3; Dhawan et al., ). Some studies have questioned the extent to which Bib might function as an aquaporin, as unable to form effective water channels in a heterologous expression system (Tatsumi et al., ; Kourghi et al., ). However, in this and in a previous study (Dhawan et al., ), Bib[RNAi] knockdown produces synaptic terminal phenotypes indistinguishable from knockdown of Drip[RNAi], or from mis-expression [GoF] of secreted forms of catalase (Dhawan et al., ). This suggests that Bib functions in the same pathway as the aquaporin Drip, potentially forming part of a heteromeric channel with permeability for hydrogen peroxide.
3.3. Independent, local regulation of pre- and postsynaptic terminal growth
Overactivation of neurons results in changes to both pre- and postsynaptic terminals, though it has been unclear in how far such changes in growth of input and output compartments might be co-ordinately regulated. Working with this experimental system we identified two sets of manipulations that suggest the growth of pre- and postsynaptic terminals can be regulated independently. First, in motoneurons that have been over-activated by mis-expression of dTrpA1[GoF], RNAi knockdown of Nox has no effect on the activity-induced reduction of the postsynaptic dendrites, which receive all synaptic input from pre-motor interneurons (Nox protein appears to be excluded from dendrites); while at the presynaptic NMJ of those same neurons, activity-linked overgrowth is significantly suppressed by knockdown of Nox[RNAi]. This contrasts with the ability of Duox[RNAi] knockdown to suppresses dTrpA1[GoF] over-activation phenotypes at both pre- and postsynaptic terminals.
Second, RNAi knockdown alone of the genes coding for aquaporin channel proteins Bib or Drip cause significant dendritic overgrowth, without affecting the presynaptic NMJ. These manipulations suggest that, at least in Drosophila larval motoneurons, synaptic terminal growth can be regulated locally through ROS signaling, such that pre- and postsynaptic compartments can adjust independently from each other. This makes sense when viewing extracellular ROS as local signals for over-activation, to which cells respond by adjusting their synaptic terminals. It remains to be seen to what extent extracellular ROS might impact on the regulation of synaptic transmission.
In summary, it is increasingly appreciated that ROS are important signals, whose signaling capability is proportional to the spatiotemporal precision attained. Sub-cellular specificity of ROS generators, such as the NAPDH oxidases studied here, is an important facet.
4. Materials and methods
4.1. Fly genetics
Drosophila melanogaster strains were maintained on standard apple juice-based agar medium at 25°C. Fly strains used were: OregonR (#2376 Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center), dTrpA1 in attP16 (Hamada et al., ; FBtp0089791), Duox[RNAi]1 (#32903 BDSC; FBtp0064955), Duox[RNAi]2 (#38916 BDSC; FBgn0283531), Nox[RNAi]1 (Ha et al., ,; FBal0191562), Nox[RNAi]2 (#32433 BDSC; FBgn0085428), bib[RNAi]1 (#57493 BDSC; FBtp0096443), bib[RNAi]2 (#27691 BDSC; FBtp0052515), Drip[RNAi]1 (#44661 BDSC; FBtp0090566), Drip[RNAi]2 (#106911 Vienna Drosophila Resource Center; FBtp0045814; Bergland et al., ), Prip[RNAi]2 (#44464 BDSC; FBtp0090258), Duox[GoF]1 (Ha et al., ,), Duox::mRuby2::HA (Duox[GoF]2; this paper), Nox::YPet (Nox[GoF]; this paper), hSecrC[GoF] (human secreted catalase; FBal0190351; Ha et al., ,; Fogarty et al., ), dIRC[GoF] (Drosophila extracellular immune-regulated catalase; FBal0191070, Ha et al., ,).
Transgene expression was carried out at 25°C targeted to RP2 and aCC motoneurons using the Gal4 expression line “aCC/RP2-Gal4”: RN2-O-Gal4, UAS-FLP, tubulin84b-FRT-CD2-FRT-Gal4; RRFa-Gal4, 20xUAS-6XmCherry::HA (Pignoni et al., ; Fujioka et al., ; Shearin et al., ). RN2-GAL4 expression in RP2 and aCC motoneurons is restricted to the embryo, subsequently maintained by FLPase-gated tubulin84B-FRT-CD2-FRT-GAL4 (Ou et al., ). We studied the mCherry expression to confirm that Gal4 expression is restricted to aCC and RP2 (Supplementary Figure 1). To study the localization of tagged Nox::YPet and Duox::mRuby2::HA, transgene expression was targeted to aCC motoneurons using GMR94g006-Gal4 (#40701 BDSC; FBgn0053512; Pérez-Moreno and O'Kane, ). pJFRC12-10XUAS-IVS-Nox-YPet (GenBank OP716753) in VK00040 [cytogenetic 87B10] was generated by Klenow assembly cloning (tinyurl.com/4r99uv8m). Briefly, from pJFRC12-10XUAS-IVS-myr-GFP plasmid DNA we removed the coding sequence for myr::GFP using XhoI and XbaI, and replaced it with Nox cDNA from DGRC clone FI15205 (kindly provided by Kenneth H. Wan, DGRC Stock 1661239; https://dgrc.bio.indiana.edu//stock/1661239; RRID:DGRC_1661239), its 3' stop codon replaced by a flexible glycine-serine linker, followed by YPet (Nguyen and Daugherty, ). Similarly, we created pJFRC12-10XUAS-IVS-Duox-mRuby2-HA (GenBank OP716752) in landing site VK00022 [cytogenetic 57A5] using Duox cDNA kindly provided by Won-Jae Lee, its 3' stop codon replaced by a flexible glycine-serine linker, followed by mRuby2 (Lam et al., ), followed by another glycine-serine flexible linker and four tandem repeats of the hemagglutinin (HA) epitope. Transgenics were generated via phiC31 integrase-mediated recombination (Bischof et al., ) into defined landing sites by the FlyORF Injection Service (Zürich, Switzerland).
4.2. Dissections and immunocytochemistry
Flies were allowed to lay eggs on apple-juice agar based medium overnight at 25°C. Larvae were reared at 25°C on yeast paste, avoiding over-crowding. Precise staging of the late wandering third instar stage was achieved by: (a) checking that a proportion of animals from the same time-restricted egg lay had initiated pupariation; (b) larvae had reached a certain size and (c) showed gut-clearance of food [yeast paste supplemented with Bromophenol Blue Sodium Salt (Sigma-Aldrich)]. Larvae were dissected in Sorensen's saline, fixed for 5 min at room temperature in Bouins fixative or 10 min 4% paraformaldehyde (Agar Scientific) when staining for GFP/YPet epitopes, as detailed (Oswald M. C. et al., ). Wash solution was Sorensen's saline containing 0.3% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich) and 0.25% BSA (Sigma-Aldrich). Primary antibodies, incubated overnight at 10°C, were: Goat-anti-HRP Alexa Fluor 488 (1:1000; Jackson ImmunoResearch Cat. No. 123-545-021), Rabbit-anti-dsRed (1:1000; ClonTech Cat. No. 632496), Mouse nc82 (Bruchpilot; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank Cat No nc82), Chicken anti-GFP (1:5000; abcam Cat No ab13970); secondary antibodies, 2 h at room temperature: Donkey anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 647; Donkey-anti-Rabbit CF568 (1:1200; Biotium Cat. No. 20098), Donkey anti-Chicken CF488 (1:1000; Cambridge Bioscience Cat No 20166), and goat anti-Rabbit Atto594 (1:1000; Sigma-Aldrich Cat No 77671-1ML-F). Specimens were cleared in 70% glycerol, overnight at 4°C, then mounted in Mowiol.
Each experiment was performed at least two independent times. The “control” genotype is aCC/RP2-Gal4/+ generated by crossing wild type Oregon R flies to the aCC/RP2-Gal4 line.
4.3. Image acquisition and analysis
Specimens were imaged using a Leica SP5 point-scanning confocal, and a 63x/1.3 N.A. (Leica) glycerol immersion objective lens and Leica Application Suite Advanced Fluorescence software. Confocal images were processed using ImageJ (to quantify active zones) and Affinity Photo (Adobe; to prepare figures). Bouton number of the NMJ on muscle DA1 from segments A3-A5 was determined by counting every distinct spherical varicosity along the NMJ branch.
To study if genetic manipulations targeted to aCC and RP2 motoneurons change muscle size we measured surface area of DA1 muscles, imaged with DIC optics using a Zeiss Axiophot microscope and a Plan-Neofluar 10x/0.3 N.A. objective lens. Images were taken with an Orca CCD camera (Hamamatsu) and muscle surface area was determined using ImageJ by multiplying muscle length by width. Differences in animal or muscle growth would lead to clear correlations between muscle surface area and bouton number. No changes in animal growth were observed, irrespective of aCC manipulation. In line with this, quantification of key representative experiments, covering most transgenic lines and conditions where genetic manipulation of aCC motoneurons cause significant changes in bouton number, shows no statistically significant differences in average muscle size. Correlating individual muscle size with bouton number shows that the biggest differences in muscle surface area are due to dissection artifact, e.g., extent of stretching larval filets (see Supplementary Figure 2). Taking account of this, bouton numbers are shown as raw counts, not normalized to average muscle surface area.
Representative schematics, drawings and plates of photomicrographs were generated with Affinity Photo (Serif Ltd., United Kingdom).
4.4. Statistical analysis
All data handling was performed using Prism software (GraphPad). NMJ bouton number data were tested for normal/Gaussian distribution using the D'Agostino-Pearson omnibus normality test. For normally distributed data one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), with Tukey's multiple comparisons test was applied, while for non-normal distributions Kruskal-Wallis test was applied.
Statements
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, OP716752 and OP716753.
Author contributions
DS-C, MO, AM, and ML conceived of the study and wrote the manuscript. DB cloned Duox and Nox transgenes. ML generated transgenic stocks. DS-C and MO carried out all experiments and analyzed data. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was made possible through support by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) to ML (BB/R016666/1 and BB/V014943/1). DS-C was supported by the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO) with a long-term EMBO fellowship (ALTF 62-2021) and a John Stanley Gardiner studentship to AM. The work benefited from the Imaging Facility, Department of Zoology, supported by Matt Wayland and funds from a Wellcome Trust Equipment Grant (WT079204) with contributions by the Sir Isaac Newton Trust in Cambridge, including Research Grant [18.07ii(c)].
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Niklas Krick for feedback on the manuscript. The authors are grateful to Andreas Bergmann, Paul Garrity, Won-Jae Lee, Paul Martin, Sean Sweeney, Helen Weavers, and Will Wood, as well as the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center and Vienna Drosophila Resource Center for generously providing fly stocks; and to Won-Jae Lee for providing DNA containing Duox cDNA, and the Drosophila Genomics Resource Center (DGRC), supported by NIH grant 2P40OD010949, for clone FI15205 containing Nox cDNA.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fncel.2022.1106593/full#supplementary-material
Supplementary Figure 1aCC/RP2 Gal4. (A) Schematic representation of internal muscles of a 3rd instar larva with muscle DA1 shown in magenta. The highlighted area was imaged, shown in (B); (B) Peripheral projections of Gal4-expressing aCC and RP2 motoneurons were visualized by UAS-6xmCherry. HRP staining reveals all neurons, the composite with mCherry shows specificity of Gal4 restricted to aCC and RP2 motoneurons. Scale bar: 100 μm.
Supplementary Figure 2Muscles size. (A) Dot-plot quantification shows no statistically significant differences in average muscle surface area (MSA) between genotypes, including with mis-expression of UAS-dTrpA1 (red). Mean ± SEM, Kruskal-Wallis test. (B) Linear regression using the control data shows not correlation between aCC NMJ terminal bouton numbers and muscle size, p-value = 0.7866.
References
1
AcebesA.MoralesM. (2012). At a PI3K crossroads: Lessons from flies and rodents. Rev. Neurosci. 23, 29–37. 10.1515/rns.2011.057
2
AlbertiniR.BianchiR. (2010). Aquaporins and glia. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 8, 84–91. 10.2174/157015910791233178
3
BainesR. A.RobinsonS. G.FujiokaM.JaynesJ. B.BateM. (1999). Postsynaptic expression of tetanus toxin light chain blocks synaptogenesis in Drosophila. Curr. Biol.. 9, 1267–1270. 10.1016/S0960-9822(99)80510-7
4
BainesR. A.UhlerJ. P.ThompsonA.SweeneyS. T.BateM. (2001). Altered electrical properties in Drosophila neurons developing without synaptic transmission. J. Neurosci. 21, 1523–1531. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-05-01523.2001
5
BánfiB.TironeF.DurusselI.KniszJ.MoskwaP.MolnárG. Z.et al. (2004). Mechanism of Ca2+ activation of the NADPH oxidase 5 (NOX5). J. Biol. Chem. 279, 18583–18591. 10.1074/jbc.M310268200
6
BateM. (1993). “The mesoderm and its derivatives,” in The Development of Drosophila Melanogaster Vol. II, eds C. M. Bate and A. Martinez-Arias (Cold Spring Harbor, NY: The development of Drosophila melanogaster), 1013–1090.
7
BayatV.JaiswalM.BellenH. J. (2011). The BMP signaling pathway at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction and its links to neurodegenerative diseases. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 21, 182–188. 10.1016/j.conb.2010.08.014
8
BerglandA. O.ChaeH. S.KimY. J.TatarM. (2012). Fine-scale mapping of natural variation in fly fecundity identifies neuronal domain of expression and function of an aquaporin. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002631. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002631
9
BerkeB.WittnamJ.McNeillE.Van VactorD. L.KeshishianH. (2013). Retrograde BMP signaling at the synapse: A permissive signal for synapse maturation and activity-dependent plasticity. J. Neurosci. 33, 17937–17950. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6075-11.2013
10
BischofJ.MaedaR. K.HedigerM.KarchF.BaslerK. (2007). An optimized transgenesis system for Drosophila using germ-line-specific phiC31 integrases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104, 3312–3317. 10.1073/pnas.0611511104
11
BudnikV.SalinasP. C. (2011). Wnt signaling during synaptic development and plasticity. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 21, 151–159. 10.1016/j.conb.2010.12.002
12
ChandrasekaranV.LeaC.SosaJ. C.HigginsD.LeinP. J. (2015). Reactive oxygen species are involved in BMP-induced dendritic growth in cultured rat sympathetic neurons. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 67, 116–125. 10.1016/j.mcn.2015.06.007
13
ChoR. W.BuhlL. K.VolfsonD.TranA.LiF.AkbergenovaY.et al. (2015). Phosphorylation of complexin by PKA regulates activity-dependent spontaneous neurotransmitter release and structural synaptic plasticity. Neuron88, 749–761. 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.10.011
14
ChoiJ. C.ParkD.GriffithL. C. (2004). Electrophysiological and morphological characterization of identified motor neurons in the Drosophila third instar larva central nervous system. J. Neurophysiol. 91, 2353–2365. 10.1152/jn.01115.2003
15
CrossleyA. C. (1978). “The morphology and development of the Drosophila muscular system,” in The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, Vol. 2b, eds M. Ashburner and T. Wright (New York, NY: Academic), 499–560.
16
DavisG. W. (2006). Homeostatic control of neural activity: From phenomenology to molecular design. Ann. Rev. Neurosci. 29, 307–323. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135751
17
DavisG. W.DiAntonioA.PetersenS. A.GoodmanC. S. (1998). Postsynaptic PKA controls quantal size and reveals a retrograde signal that regulates presynaptic transmitter release in Drosophila. Neuron20, 305–315. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80458-4
18
DavisG. W.MüllerM. (2015). Homeostatic control of presynaptic neurotransmitter release. Ann. Rev. Physiol. 77, 251–270. 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021014-071740
19
DavisG. W.SchusterC. M.GoodmanC. S. (1996). Genetic dissection of structural and functional components of synaptic plasticity. III. CREB is necessary for presynaptic functional plasticity. Neuron.17, 669–679. 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80199-3
20
DhawanS.MyersP.BaileyD.OstrovskyA. D.EversJ. F.LandgrafM. (2021). Reactive oxygen species mediate activity-regulated dendritic plasticity through NADPH oxidase and aquaporin regulation. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 15, 641802. 10.3389/fncel.2021.641802
21
DuttaA.DasM. (2022). Deciphering the role of aquaporins in metabolic diseases: A mini review. Am. J. Med. Sci. 364, 148–162. 10.1016/j.amjms.2021.10.029
22
FogartyC. E.DiwanjiN.LindbladJ. L.TareM.AmcheslavskyA.MakhijaniK.et al. (2016). Extracellular reactive oxygen species drive apoptosis-induced proliferation via Drosophila macrophages. Curr. Biol. 26, 575–584. 10.1016/j.cub.2015.12.064
23
FogleK. J.BaikL. S.HoulJ. H.TranT. T.RobertsL.DahmN. A.et al. (2015). CRYPTOCHROME-mediated phototransduction by modulation of the potassium ion channel β-subunit redox sensor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 112, 2245–2250. 10.1073/pnas.1416586112
24
FrankC. A.WangX.CollinsC. A.RodalA. A.YuanQ.VerstrekenP.et al. (2013). New approaches for studying synaptic development, function, and plasticity using Drosophila as a model system. J. Neurosci. 33, 17560–17568. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3261-13.2013
25
FujiokaM.LearB. C.LandgrafM.YusibovaG. L.ZhouJ.RileyK. M.et al. (2003). Even-skipped, acting as a repressor, regulates axonal projections in Drosophila. Development130, 5385–5400. 10.1242/dev.00770
26
FunatoY.MichiueT.AsashimaM.MikiH. (2006). The thioredoxin-related redox-regulating protein nucleoredoxin inhibits Wnt-beta-catenin signalling through dishevelled. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 501–508. 10.1038/ncb1405
27
GoldsmitY.ErlichS.Pinkas-KramarskiR. (2001). Neuregulin induces sustained reactive oxygen species generation to mediate neuronal differentiation. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 21, 753–769. 10.1023/A:1015108306171
28
HaE. M.LeeK. A.ParkS. H.KimS. H.NamH. J.LeeH. Y.et al. (2009). Regulation of DUOX by the G alpha q-phospholipase Cbeta-Ca2+ pathway in Drosophila gut immunity. Develop. Cell16, 386–397. 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.12.015
29
HaE. M.OhC. T.BaeY. S.LeeW. J. (2005a). A direct role for dual oxidase in Drosophila gut immunity. Science310, 847–850. 10.1126/science.1117311
30
HaE. M.OhC. T.RyuJ. H.BaeY. S.KangS. W.JangI. H.et al. (2005b). An antioxidant system required for host protection against gut infection in Drosophila. Develop. Cell8, 125–132. 10.1016/j.devcel.2004.11.007
31
HamadaF. N.RosenzweigM.KangK.PulverS. R.GhezziA.JeglaT. J.et al. (2008). An internal thermal sensor controlling temperature preference in Drosophila. Nature454, 217–220. 10.1038/nature07001
32
HoangB.ChibaA. (2001). Single-cell analysis of Drosophila larval neuromuscular synapses. Develop. Biol. 229, 55–70. 10.1006/dbio.2000.9983
33
HongpaisanJ.WintersC. A.AndrewsS. B. (2003). Calcium-dependent mitochondrial superoxide modulates nuclear CREB phosphorylation in hippocampal neurons. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 24, 1103–1115. 10.1016/j.mcn.2003.09.003
34
HongpaisanJ.WintersC. A.AndrewsS. B. (2004). Strong calcium entry activates mitochondrial superoxide generation, upregulating kinase signaling in hippocampal neurons. J. Neurosci. 24, 10878–10887. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3278-04.2004
35
HussainA.PooryasinA.ZhangM.LoschekL. F.La FortezzaM.FriedrichA. B.et al. (2018). Inhibition of oxidative stress in cholinergic projection neurons fully rescues aging-associated olfactory circuit degeneration in Drosophila. eLife7, e32018. 10.7554/eLife.32018
36
Jordán-ÁlvarezS.FouquetW.SigristS. J.AcebesA. (2012). Presynaptic PI3K activity triggers the formation of glutamate receptors at neuromuscular terminals of Drosophila. J. Cell Sci. 125, 3621–3629. 10.1242/jcs.102806
37
KamataH.OkaS.ShibukawaY.KakutaJ.HirataH. (2005). Redox regulation of nerve growth factor-induced neuronal differentiation of PC12 cells through modulation of the nerve growth factor receptor, TrkA. Archiv. Biochem. Biophys. 434, 16–25. 10.1016/j.abb.2004.07.036
38
KawaharaT.QuinnM. T.LambethJ. D. (2007). Molecular evolution of the reactive oxygen-generating NADPH oxidase (Nox/Duox) family of enzymes. BMC Evolution. Biol. 7, 109. 10.1186/1471-2148-7-109
39
KempfA.SongS. M.TalbotC. B.MiesenböckG. (2019). A potassium channel β-subunit couples mitochondrial electron transport to sleep. Nature568, 230–234. 10.1038/s41586-019-1034-5
40
KishidaK. T.HoefferC. A.HuD.PaoM.HollandS. M.KlannE. (2006). Synaptic plasticity deficits and mild memory impairments in mouse models of chronic granulomatous disease. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26, 5908–5920. 10.1128/MCB.00269-06
41
KishidaK. T.KlannE. (2007). Sources and targets of reactive oxygen species in synaptic plasticity and memory. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 9, 233–244. 10.1089/ars.2007.9.233
42
KnappL. T.KlannE. (2002). Role of reactive oxygen species in hippocampal long-term potentiation: Contributory or inhibitory?J. Neurosci. Res. 70, 1–7. 10.1002/jnr.10371
43
KolesK.BudnikV. (2012). Wnt signaling in neuromuscular junction development. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol. 4, a008045. 10.1101/cshperspect.a008045
44
KourghiM.PeiJ. V.De IesoM. L.NourmohammadiS.ChowP. H.YoolA. J. (2018). Fundamental structural and functional properties of Aquaporin ion channels found across the kingdoms of life. Clin. Exper. Pharmacol. Physiol.45, 401–409. 10.1111/1440-1681.12900
45
LachaiseD.CariouM. L.DavidJ. R.LemeunierF.TsacasL.AshburnerM. (1988). “Historical biogeography of the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup,” in Evolutionary Biology (Boston, MA: Springer), 159–225. 10.1007/978-1-4613-0931-4_4
46
LamA. J.St-PierreF.GongY.MarshallJ. D.CranfillP. J.BairdM. A.et al. (2012). Improving FRET dynamic range with bright green and red fluorescent proteins. Nat. Methods9, 1005–1012. 10.1038/nmeth.2171
47
LambethJ. D. (2002). Nox/Duox family of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (phosphate) oxidases. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 9, 11–17. 10.1097/00062752-200201000-00003
48
LandgrafM.BossingT.TechnauG. M.BateM. (1997). The origin, location, and projections of the embryonic abdominal motorneurons of Drosophila. J. Neurosci. 17, 9642–9655. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-24-09642.1997
49
LiZ.JiG.NeugebauerV. (2011). Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species are activated by mGluR5 through IP3 and activate ERK and PKA to increase excitability of amygdala neurons and pain behavior. J. Neurosci. 31, 1114–1127. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5387-10.2011
50
LoveN. R.ChenY.IshibashiS.KritsiligkouP.LeaR.KohY.et al. (2013). Amputation-induced reactive oxygen species are required for successful Xenopus tadpole tail regeneration. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 222–228. 10.1038/ncb2659
51
Martín-PeñaA.AcebesA.RodríguezJ. R.SorribesA.de PolaviejaG. G.Fernández-FúnezP.et al. (2006). Age-independent synaptogenesis by phosphoinositide 3 kinase. J. Neurosci. 26, 10199–10208. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1223-06.2006
52
MartinsR. N.HarperC. G.StokesG. B.MastersC. L. (1986). Increased cerebral glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity in Alzheimer's disease may reflect oxidative stress. J. Neurochem. 46, 1042–1045. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1986.tb00615.x
53
MassaadC. A.KlannE. (2011). Reactive oxygen species in the regulation of synaptic plasticity and memory. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 14, 2013–2054. 10.1089/ars.2010.3208
54
Millana FañanásE.TodescaS.SicorelloA.MasinoL.PompachP.MagnaniF.et al. (2020). On the mechanism of calcium-dependent activation of NADPH oxidase 5 (NOX5). FEBS J. 287, 2486–2503. 10.1111/febs.15160
55
MiltonV. J.JarrettH. E.GowersK.ChalakS.BriggsL.RobinsonI. M.et al. (2011). Oxidative stress induces overgrowth of the Drosophila neuromuscular junction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108, 17521–17526. 10.1073/pnas.1014511108
56
MoreiraS.StramerB.EvansI.WoodW.MartinP. (2010). Prioritization of competing damage and developmental signals by migrating macrophages in the Drosophila embryo. Curr. Biol. 20, 464–470. 10.1016/j.cub.2010.01.047
57
MunnamalaiV.SuterD. M. (2009). Reactive oxygen species regulate F-actin dynamics in neuronal growth cones and neurite outgrowth. J. Neurochem. 108, 644–661. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05787.x
58
MunnamalaiV.WeaverC. J.WeisheitC. E.VenkatramanP.AgimZ. S.QuinnM. T.et al. (2014). Bidirectional interactions between NOX2-type NADPH oxidase and the F-actin cytoskeleton in neuronal growth cones. J. Neurochem. 130, 526–540. 10.1111/jnc.12734
59
MurphyM. P. (2009). How mitochondria produce reactive oxygen species. Biochem. J. 417, 1–13. 10.1042/BJ20081386
60
NguyenA. W.DaughertyP. S. (2005). Evolutionary optimization of fluorescent proteins for intracellular FRET. Nat. Biotechnol.23, 355–360. 10.1038/nbt1066
61
NiethammerP. (2016). The early wound signals. Curr. Opin. Genet. Develop. 40, 17–22. 10.1016/j.gde.2016.05.001
62
NiethammerP.GrabherC.LookA. T.MitchisonT. J. (2009). A tissue-scale gradient of hydrogen peroxide mediates rapid wound detection in zebrafish. Nature459, 996–999. 10.1038/nature08119
63
NittiM.FurfaroA. L.CevascoC.TraversoN.MarinariU. M.PronzatoM. A.et al. (2010). PKC delta and NADPH oxidase in retinoic acid-induced neuroblastoma cell differentiation. Cell. Signal. 22, 828–835. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2010.01.007
64
Olguín-AlbuerneM.MoránJ. (2015). ROS produced by NOX2 control in vitro development of cerebellar granule neurons development. ASN Neuro7, 1759091415578712. 10.1177/1759091415578712
65
OssesN.HenríquezJ. P. (2015). Bone morphogenetic protein signaling in vertebrate motor neurons and neuromuscular communication. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 8, 453. 10.3389/fncel.2014.00453
66
OswaldM.GarnhamN.SweeneyS. T.LandgrafM. (2018). Regulation of neuronal development and function by ROS. FEBS Lett. 592, 679–691. 10.1002/1873-3468.12972
67
OswaldM. C.BrooksP. S.ZwartM. F.MukherjeeA.WestR. J.GiachelloC. N.et al. (2018). Reactive oxygen species regulate activity-dependent neuronal plasticity in Drosophila. eLife7, e39393. 10.7554/eLife.39393
68
OuY.ChwallaB.LandgrafM.van MeyelD. J. (2008). Identification of genes influencing dendrite morphogenesis in developing peripheral sensory and central motor neurons. Neural Develop. 3, 16. 10.1186/1749-8104-3-16
69
Owusu-AnsahE.BanerjeeU. (2009). Reactive oxygen species prime Drosophila haematopoietic progenitors for differentiation. Nature461, 537–541. 10.1038/nature08313
70
PandayA.SahooM. K.OsorioD.BatraS. (2015). NADPH oxidases: An overview from structure to innate immunity-associated pathologies. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 12, 5–23. 10.1038/cmi.2014.89
71
PengJ. J.LinS. H.LiuY. T.LinH. C.LiT. N.YaoC. K. (2019). A circuit-dependent ROS feedback loop mediates glutamate excitotoxicity to sculpt the Drosophila motor system. eLife8, e47372. 10.7554/eLife.47372
72
Pérez-MorenoJ. J.O'KaneC. J. (2019). GAL4 drivers specific for Type Ib and Type Is motor neurons in Drosophila. G39, 453–462. 10.1534/g3.118.200809
73
PignoniF.HuB.ZipurskyS. L. (1997). Identification of genes required for Drosophila eye development using a phenotypic enhancer-trap. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA.94, 9220–9225. 10.1073/pnas.94.17.9220
74
PoolJ. E.Corbett-DetigR. B.SuginoR. P.StevensK. A.CardenoC. M.CrepeauM. W.et al. (2012). Population genomics of sub-saharan Drosophila melanogaster: African diversity and non-African admixture. PLoS Genet. 8, e1003080. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003080
75
PulverS. R.PashkovskiS. L.HornsteinN. J.GarrityP. A.GriffithL. C. (2009). Temporal dynamics of neuronal activation by Channelrhodopsin-2 and TRPA1 determine behavioral output in Drosophila larvae. J. Neurophysiol. 101, 3075–3088. 10.1152/jn.00071.2009
76
RazzellW.EvansI. R.MartinP.WoodW. (2013). Calcium flashes orchestrate the wound inflammatory response through DUOX activation and hydrogen peroxide release. Curr. Biol. 23, 424–429. 10.1016/j.cub.2013.01.058
77
RharassT.LemckeH.LantowM.KuznetsovS. A.WeissD. G.PanákováD. (2014). Ca2+-mediated mitochondrial reactive oxygen species metabolism augments Wnt/β-catenin pathway activation to facilitate cell differentiation. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 27937–27951. 10.1074/jbc.M114.573519
78
RheeS. G. (1999). Redox signaling: hydrogen peroxide as intracellular messenger. Exp. Mol. Med. 31, 53–59. 10.1038/emm.1999.9
79
RiguttoS.HosteC.GrasbergerH.MilenkovicM.CommuniD.DumontJ. E.et al. (2009). Activation of dual oxidases Duox1 and Duox2: differential regulation mediated by camp-dependent protein kinase and protein kinase C-dependent phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 6725–6734. 10.1074/jbc.M806893200
80
Sánchez-de-DiegoC.ValerJ. A.Pimenta-LopesC.RosaJ. L.VenturaF. (2019). Interplay between BMPs and reactive oxygen species in cell signaling and pathology. Biomolecules9, 534. 10.3390/biom9100534
81
SanyalS.NarayananR.ConsoulasC.RamaswamiM. (2003). Evidence for cell autonomous AP1 function in regulation of Drosophila motor-neuron plasticity. BMC Neurosci. 4, 20. 10.1186/1471-2202-4-20
82
SanyalS.SandstromD. J.HoefferC. A.RamaswamiM. (2002). AP-1 functions upstream of CREB to control synaptic plasticity in Drosophila. Nature416, 870–874. 10.1038/416870a
83
SanzA. (2016). Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species: Do they extend or shorten animal lifespan?Biochim. Biophys. Acta1857, 1116–1126. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2016.03.018
84
SauerH.WartenbergM.HeschelerJ. (2001). Reactive oxygen species as intracellular messengers during cell growth and differentiation. Cell. Physiol. Biochem.11, 173–186. 10.1159/000047804
85
SerranoF.KolluriN. S.WientjesF. B.CardJ. P.KlannE. (2003). NADPH oxidase immunoreactivity in the mouse brain. Brain Res.988, 193–198. 10.1016/S0006-8993(03)03364-X
86
ShearinH. K.MacdonaldI. S.SpectorL. P.StowersR. S. (2014). Hexameric GFP and mCherry reporters for the Drosophila GAL4, Q, and LexA transcription systems. Genetics196, 951–960. 10.1534/genetics.113.161141
87
SinkH.WhitingtonP. M. (1991). Location and connectivity of abdominal motoneurons in the embryo and larva of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Neurobiol. 22, 298–311. 10.1002/neu.480220309
88
SpinaM. B.CohenG. (1989). Dopamine turnover and glutathione oxidation: Implications for Parkinson disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 1398–1400. 10.1073/pnas.86.4.1398
89
SulkowskiM.KimY. J.SerpeM. (2014). Postsynaptic glutamate receptors regulate local BMP signaling at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction. Development141, 436–447. 10.1242/dev.097758
90
SuzukawaK.MiuraK.MitsushitaJ.ResauJ.HiroseK.CrystalR.et al. (2000). Nerve growth factor-induced neuronal differentiation requires generation of Rac1-regulated reactive oxygen species. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 13175–13178. 10.1074/jbc.275.18.13175
91
TatsumiK.TsujiS.MiwaH.MorisakuT.NuriyaM.OriharaM.et al. (2009). Drosophila big brain does not act as a water channel, but mediates cell adhesion. FEBS Lett.583, 2077–2082. 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.05.035
92
Tejada-SimonM. V.SerranoF.VillasanaL. E.KanterewiczB. I.WuG. Y.QuinnM. T.et al. (2005). Synaptic localization of a functional NADPH oxidase in the mouse hippocampus. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 29, 97–106. 10.1016/j.mcn.2005.01.007
93
TerziA.SuterD. M. (2020). The role of NADPH oxidases in neuronal development. Free Rad. Biol. Med. 154, 33–47. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2020.04.027
94
TripodiM.EversJ. F.MaussA.BateM.LandgrafM. (2008). Structural homeostasis: compensatory adjustments of dendritic arbor geometry in response to variations of synaptic input. PLoS Biol.6:e260. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060260
95
TsaiP. I.WangM.KaoH. H.ChengY. J.LinY. J.ChenR. H.et al. (2012). Activity-dependent retrograde laminin A signaling regulates synapse growth at Drosophila neuromuscular junctions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109, 17699–17704. 10.1073/pnas.1206416109
96
WalkerJ. A.GouziJ. Y.LongJ. B.HuangS.MaherR. C.XiaH.et al. (2013). Genetic and functional studies implicate synaptic overgrowth and ring gland cAMP/PKA signaling defects in the Drosophila melanogaster neurofibromatosis-1 growth deficiency. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003958. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003958
97
WilsonC.González-BillaultC. (2015). Regulation of cytoskeletal dynamics by redox signaling and oxidative stress: Implications for neuronal development and trafficking. Fronti. Cell. Neurosci. 9, 381. 10.3389/fncel.2015.00381
98
WilsonC.Muñoz-PalmaE.González-BillaultC. (2018). From birth to death: A role for reactive oxygen species in neuronal development. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 80, 43–49. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.09.012
99
WilsonC.Muñoz-PalmaE.HenríquezD. R.PalmisanoI.NúñezM. T.Di GiovanniS.et al. (2016). A feed-forward mechanism involving the NOX complex and RyR-mediated Ca2+ release during axonal specification. J. Neurosci. 36, 11107–11119. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1455-16.2016
100
WilsonC.NúñezM. T.González-BillaultC. (2015). Contribution of NADPH oxidase to the establishment of hippocampal neuronal polarity in culture. J. Cell Sci. 128, 2989–2995. 10.1242/jcs.168567
101
ZorovD. B.JuhaszovaM.SollottS. J. (2014). Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) and ROS-induced ROS release. Physiol. Rev. 94, 909–950. 10.1152/physrev.00026.2013
102
ZwartM. F.RandlettO.EversJ. F.LandgrafM. (2013). Dendritic growth gated by a steroid hormone receptor underlies increases in activity in the developing Drosophila locomotor system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110, E3878–E3887. 10.1073/pnas.1311711110
Summary
Keywords
motoneuron, plasticity, Drosophila, reactive oxygen species, NADPH oxidase, dual oxidase, Nox, aquaporin genes
Citation
Sobrido-Cameán D, Oswald MCW, Bailey DMD, Mukherjee A and Landgraf M (2023) Activity-regulated growth of motoneurons at the neuromuscular junction is mediated by NADPH oxidases. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 16:1106593. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2022.1106593
Received
23 November 2022
Accepted
27 December 2022
Published
13 January 2023
Volume
16 - 2022
Edited by
C. Andrew Frank, The University of Iowa, United States
Reviewed by
Quan Yuan, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NIH), United States; Kate O'Connor-Giles, Brown University, United States; Kimberly Rose Madhwani, Brown University, United States, in collaboration with reviewer KO'C-G; Robert J. Kittel, Leipzig University, Germany
Updates
Copyright
© 2023 Sobrido-Cameán, Oswald, Bailey, Mukherjee and Landgraf.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Matthias Landgraf ✉ ml10006@cam.cam.ukDaniel Sobrido-Cameán ✉ ds918@cam.ac.uk
†These authors have contributed equally to this work
This article was submitted to Cellular Neurophysiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.